52
The Role of the Medical Director in Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Verna Sellers, MD, MPH, CMD, AGSF Medical Director Centra PACE Lynchburg, Virginia 1

The Role of the Medical Director in Quality Assurance ... of the PACE Medical...The Role of the Medical Director in Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Verna Sellers, ... A Fishbone

  • Upload
    ngobao

  • View
    214

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The Role of the Medical Director in

Quality Assurance Performance

Improvement

Verna Sellers, MD, MPH, CMD, AGSFMedical Director

Centra PACELynchburg, Virginia

1

Speaker Disclosures:

Dr. Sellers

has disclosed that she has no relevant financial relationship(s).

Role

Definition:

The set of behaviors an organizational member is expected to perform and that he/she feels obligated to perform.

4

Objectives

1.Know the PACE regulations related to Quality

Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI)

2.Describe the role of the medical director in

the design, implementation and the

monitoring of QAPI.

3.Discuss the Basic Principles of Quality

5

PACE Medical Director

42 CFR Part 460 states:

“The Organization must employ or contract with in accordance with 460.70 a medical director who is responsible for the delivery of participant care, clinical outcomes and the implementation as well as oversight of the quality assurance and performance improvement program.”

6

PACE QAPI Coordinator

The QAPI coordinator would be responsible for day-to-day quality issues, collecting data, analyzing data, detecting trends, coordinating IDT members, PACE staff, and contract providers in planning QAPI activities, disseminating reports on activities to them, and compiling comments related to participant/caregiver satisfaction and concerns.

7

Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)

Chapter 10 – Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement

(Rev. 2, Issued: 06-09-11)

20 - QAPI Program(Rev. 2, Issued: 06-09-11; Effective: 06-03-11;

Implementation: 06-03-11)

The PACE organization must develop, implement, maintain, and evaluate an effective data-driven QAPI program.

8

Definitions• Quality Assurance addresses primarily

negative outcomes

• Performance Improvement seek opportunities to improve care by improving upon satisfactory outcomes

• Continuous Quality Improvement builds on previous improvements and uses a systematic process including data analysis to enhance performance

9

American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians, Inc.

Quality Management:

Definition

• Organizational activities designed to:– Continually improve performance and productivity

levels.

– Improve the efficiency and predictability of the care process.

– Reduce unnecessary care and waste.

– Contain costs.

– Improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

--Dimant

10

The Big Picture

• Group of related interdependent processes working together to achieve a common goal

• Made up of a culture, structure and boundarySystem

• Sequence of tasks aimed at accomplishing a goal

• Produce data which can be analyzedProcess

• Have beliefs, values, interests, needs

• Have roles which are made up of functions and tasks

People

11

20.3 - Internal QAPI Activities

PACE organizations must use a set of outcome measures to identify areas of good or problematic performance and take actions targeted at maintaining or improving care based on these outcome measures. CMS expects PACE organizations to use the most current clinical practice guidelines and professional standards in the development of outcome measures applicable to the care of PACE participants.

(Rev. 2, Issued: 06-09-11; Effective: 06-03-11; Implementation: 06-03-11)

12

First Step: Select performance goals

• Census Growth

• End of life care

• Grievances

• Appeals

• Participant satisfaction

• Effectiveness of contract services

• Promptness of service delivery

13

Second Step: define success

• Routine Immunizations • Grievances and Appeals; • Enrollments; • Dis-enrollments; • Prospective Enrollees; • Readmissions; • Emergency (Unscheduled) Care; • Unusual Incidents; and, • Deaths.

14

15

Spark Lines

Infection Control Target Dec'14 YTD Infection Rate Jan'12 to Dec'14

UTI ≤2 3 26

Infections per 1000 participant days 0.34 0.62 0.21

16

Seven Basis Principles of Quality

17

Focus on Mission

Continuous Improvement

Focus on Processes & Systems

Empower Front-Line

Maintain Strong Partnerships

Leadership Commitment

Focus on Data

Schamp, R: NPA Medical Director’s Handbook

Continuous Improvement

18

Step 1 Understand the Process

Step 2 Identify the

Problem

Step 3 Attend to

the Problem

Step 4 Course of

Action

Step 5 Monitoring & Feedback

The Model for Continuous Improvement - PDCA

START

Plan

Do

Check

Act

19

Quality Improvement

• Beyond “projects” to an integrated strategy.

– Quality and continual improvement need to be a formal part of every PACE organization

– Executive commitment to quality.

– Can not overlook the cultural/psychological issues of quality improvement.

• Medical Director can not do this alone.

20

Empowering Front Line Staff

Participant Assessments

Physiological and clinical well-being

Functional status

Cognitive functioning

Emotional/mental health status

Effectiveness and safety of staff-provided and contract-provided services

Centra PACE QAPI Plan 2016

22

23

25

Root Cause Analysis

• Fishbone Diagrams

• Show the causes of a certain event.

A Fishbone or Ishikawa diagram

can be useful to break down (in

successive layers of detail) root

causes that potentially contribute to

a particular effect.

25

Plan CheckCurrent Metrics

December, 2014

Goals:

2014 FMV Rate: 2.6% per month

2014 LYN Rate: 2.1% per month

Team Members

Dawn Stanley, FMV Int Ctr Mgr Kendra Kerr, Int LYN Ctr Mgr

Renee Gilliam, FMV Clinic Coord Jenny Link, LYN Clinic Coord,

Cassandra Hurt, FMV HCC Carol Arthur,LYN HCC

Meagan Waller, FMV Dietician Brenda Meredith, LYN Dietician

Verna Sellers, MD Kimberly Woodley, Facilitator

Chrissette Brooks, Outcomes Specialist

Do● Revise nutrition criteria for Risk Assessment Tool: Brenda/Meagan

● Update Risk Assessment Tool and distribute: Kimbelry

● Trial Tool in January for all semi-annual & annual assessmetns at both sites:

Renee & Jenny

● Analyze results: Kimberly

ACT:● Determine if Risk Assessment tool is Adequate.

○ Needs revision?

○ Second trial to confirm usefulness?

● Determine scoring

● Deveiop interventions for each risk level

Pressure Ulcer Reduction

Mission Statement: Reduce the percertange of participants, who acquire any

pressure ulcer after enrollment into the PACE program or a pressure ulcer that

is present upon enrollment worsens. This rate includes all pressure ulcers

regardless of the location or stage when it is initially identified.

2015 Goal is to reduce the Centra rate to ≤ 1.5% of PACE participants will

acquire a pressure ulcer in any given month or have a pressure ulcer present on

admission worsen. This is a stretch goal.

SENSORY PERCEPTION

ability to respond meaningfully

to pressure- related discomfort

1.Comple te ly Limite d

● Unresponsive (does not moan flinch or

grasp to painful stimuli due to diminished

level of consciousness or sedation

OR

● Limited ability to feel pain over most of

body

2 . Ve ry Limite d

● Responds only to painful stimuli. Cannot

communicate discomfort except by

moaning or restlessness

OR

● Has a sensory impairment which limits

the ability to feel pain or discomfort.

3 . S lightly Limite d

● Responds to verbal commands but

cannot always communicate discomfort

or the need to be turned.

OR

● Has some sensory impairment which

limits the ability to feel pain or discomfort

in 1 or 2 extremities.

4 . No Impa irme nt

● Responds to verbal commands. Has no

sensory defic it which would limit ability to

feel or voice pain or discomfort.

COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT 1.La te , Se ve re Impa irme nt

● Nearly unintelligible verbal output

● Remote memory gone

● Unable to copy or write

● No longer grooming or dressing

● Motor or verbal agitation

● MMSE 0 to 10

2 . Middle , Mode ra te Cognitive

Impa irme nt

● Disoriented to date, place

● Comprehension difficulties (aphasia)

● Impaired new learning

● Getting lost in familiar places

● Delusions, agitation, aggression

● MMSE 11 to 20

3 . Ea rly, Mild Cognitive Impa irme nt

● Disoriented to date

● Naming difficulties (anomia)

● Recent recall problems

● Mild difficulty copying figures

● Decreased insight

● Problems managing finances

● MMSE 21 to 25

4 . Mild Cognitive Impa irme nt

●Report by patient or caregiver of memory

loss

● Objective signs of memory impairment.

● Mild construction, language, or

executive dysfunction.

● MMSE 26 to 30

MOISTURE

degree to which skin is exposed

to moisture (include feet)

1. Inc ontine nt of Bla dde r a nd/or

Bowe l

● R equires changing every two hours.

2 . Ve ry Moist

●Skin is often moist.

●Incontinent at times

●Requires assistance changing

●BMI ≥ 40 w/ multiple skin folds

3 . Oc c a siona lly moist.

● Skin is occasionally moist.

● Some skin folds

● Moisture between toes

4 . Contine nt of bla dde r a nd bowe l

● Toilet self OR

● Able to change self w/o assistance

ACTIVITY

degree of physical activity

1. Be dfa st

● Confined to bed.

2 . Cha irfa st

●Ability to walk severely limited or non-

existent.

● Cannot bear own weight and/or must be

assisted into chair or wheelchair.

3 . Wa lks Oc c a siona lly

●Walks occasionally during day but for

very short distances with or without

assistance.

●Spends majority of time in bed or in

chair.

4 . Wa lks Fre que ntly

● Walks at least once every two hours

during waking hours.

MOBILITY

ability to change and control

body position

1. Immobile

● Does not make purposeful movement

OR

● Inability to change position without

assistance.

2 . Ve ry Limite d

● Makes occasional changes in body or

extremity position but unable to make

consistent or frequent or significant

changes independently.

3 . S lightly Limite d

● Makes frequent though slight changes

in body or extremity position indecently.

4 . No Limita tion

●Makes major and frequent changes in

position without assistance.

NUTRITIONNutrition risk assessment w ill be

assessed by RD in semiannual/ annual

assessment. Rated on a scale of 1-4

as a skin core under "other" in skin

part of nutritional assessment.

1. Ne e ds proba bly not be ing me t

(two or more of the following

fa c tors)

● Weight loss or BMI ≤ 23

● Poor/ fair intake in Center

● No appetite; poor intake

● Interventions in place to meet nutritional

needs, but status remains compromised

● Totally dependent for feeding

/hydrating

2 . High Risk (two or more of the

following fa c tors)

● Weight loss due to insuffic ient calories

● Dependent and/or refuses

supplements/food

● Intake is primarily "empty calorie food"

● BMI ≤ 23

● Takes > 40 minutes to eat

● Upper GI or mouth issue effecting PO

3 . Mode ra te Risk (one or more of

the following fa c tors)

● Weight stable but questionable protein

intake.

● Dependent on supplements

● Intake is primarily "empty calorie food"

● BMI ≤ 23

● Upper GI or mouth issue effecting PO

● Weight Loss Pattern

4 .Low Risk

● Weight stable indicative of calories to

spare protein.

● Intake is primarily balanced diet from

"My Plate"

● Adequate food resources

● Able to feed self without problems

FRICTION & SHEER 1. Ma ximum Assista nc e

● Requires moderate to maximum

assistance in moving.

● Complete lifting without sliding against

sheets is impossible.

● Frequently slides down in bed requiring

frequent repositioning with maximum

assistance.

2 . Ne e ds Assista nc e

●Maintains relatively good position in

chair or bed most of the time but

occasionally slides down, and needs

some assistance for repositioning.

3 . Some Assista nc e

● Maintains relatively good position in

chair or bed most of the time seldom

slides down, and needs little assistance

for repositioning.

4 . No Assista nc e

●Maintains relatively good position in

chair or bed most of the time .

● Needs no assistance in repositioning.

Scoring: TBD

Centra PACE Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment

FMV 0.0% 0.0%

LYN 2.0% 6.0%

Centra PACE 1.9% 3.9%

Prevelence of Participants

w/ Acquired Pressure

Ulcers.

Site

Percentage of Participants w/

Acquired Pressure Ulcers

during month.

26

27

Effective QAPI Programs

Assess current

performance.

Establish a baseline for

improvement efforts.

Assess improvement

efforts.

Predict future performance.

Ensure that improvement

gains are held.

27

Focus on Process

PACE Audit Agenda

• Administrative

• Clinical

• Chart Review

• Home visit

• Bus Rides

• Interviews

• DMAS and CMS representatives

28

Quality Management vs Risk Management

• An essential component of an effective quality improvement program is risk assessment and management

• Ideally-proactive

• Reality-reactive

29

30

Overview Risk Management

Define

Analyze

Reduce Risk

Risk Management Includes

• An integrated process of defining and monitoring specific areas of risk and

• Developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to PREVENT, MITIGATE and/or RESPOND TO RISK

31

32

Centra PACE Quality Program

Centra Board of DirectorsPace Reports Quarterly

Centra Council(A Division of Centra Board)

Pace Reports Quarterly

Site Specific Participant Advisory Committee

(Staff, Participants, Family Members, Community Leaders)

Centra PACE Quality Team(Medical Director( Program

Director, Site Managers, Finance Manager & Quality Coordinator)

Rehabilitation and Geriatric Specialists Committee

(Verna Sellers, MD)

Site Specific Performance Improvement Teams

(Falls Team, Hospitalization Team)

Site Specific Participant Council

(Participants, Activities, Quality Coordinator)

Individual PACE Employees

Bioethics Committee (Includes Medical Director

MD)

Compliance Committee(Includes Director of

Corporate Compliance)

Waste, Fraud, and Abuse and Pharmacy Review Committee

(Corporate Compliane, Medical Director, Program Director, Site Directors,Finance

Manager, Transportation Coordinator,

Pharmacy Reprentatives, PACE Pharmacy, HCC, Quality Coordinator)

Site Sepecific Quality Team(Medical Director, Specific Site Manager, Transportation, SW,

Activities, HCC, & Quality Coordinator)

Southside Community Board of Directors

(A Division of Centra Board)Pace Reports Quarterly

Southside Professional & Patient Care Committee

(A Division of Centra Board)Pace Reports Quarterly

References

o http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/pace/downloads/finalreg.pdf

o http://www.npaonline.org/website/download.asp?id=1783&title=PACE_Final_Rule_-_12/08/06

33

34

Thank you

[email protected]

35

The Right Tool

for the Right Job!

36

Flowcharting• To allow a team to identify the flow or

sequence of events in a process; helps picture the process.

– Shows where simplification / standardization possible.

– Compares / contrasts actual vs. ideal flow, thus identifying improvement opportunities.

– Facilitates agreement on the steps of a process & examines impact of activities of process performance.

– Identifies areas for data collection and analysis.

37

38

39

Prt in Hospital

HCC/Navigator Talk

w/Prt Family

Prt in ED

Available RN Coordinate

DR. SELLERS NEED TO

EDUCATE

Prt in PACE Clinic

Hospital Case

Management and

PACE SW Coordinate

Going to Facility

RN/MD contacts SW to

Coordinate

MD Determine Level

of Care based on input

from Therapy, RN,

Hospital Notes, etc.

SW Coordinates with

Clinic, Therapy, &

Transport

MD determines level

of care with input

from SW/Therapy/RN

MD determines

number of days

(Woodland ≥ 7 days)

SW/Therapy/RN

Woodlands Other Facilities

SW in conjunction w/

Dept. Asst. create

authorization form and

obtain sign. GG or MB

Fax basic info to other

facilities

Dawn/SW/HHC

Dawn/HHC/SW FAX

infor to Woodland to

determine bed

availability

Send Authorization

Number

Facility Stay Flow Chart

Participant SickCan't go home

Prt./Family Agrees to go to a Facility

MD/RN talk with

Prt/Family

Bed is Obtained

39

40

Describing the Process• Include all members of the team

– They can tell you what is stopping them from doing their job.

– Also gives you an opportunity to see if they:

• Know what should be done.

• Know how to do it.

• Understand why it is important.

• Think their way is better than the required way.

40

SIPOC Diagram

The SIPOC tool is particularly useful when it is not clear:

• Who supplies inputs to the process?

• What specifications are placed on the inputs?

• Who are the true customers of the process?

• What are the requirements of the customers?

41

SIPOC Diagram

• identify all relevant elements of a process improvement project before work begins

• defines a complex project that may not be well scoped

• similar and related to process mapping or flowcharting but provides additional detail.

42

SIPOC Diagram

• Suppliers

• Input

• Process

• Outcome

• Customer

43

S

Suppliers

I

Inputs

P

Process

O

Output

C

Customer

Clinic

(On Call Nurse)

Clinic Schedule

Adjusted (if Initiated)

TherapyDME Coordination (if

Initiated)

TransportationAssign Pick Up/Drop

Off Times

Home Care

Coordinator

Adjust PCA hours with

Agency

MealsMeal: Current Diet/

Take Home/ "box lunch"

Staffing Maintain 6:1 Ratio

Participant NotificationParticipant Notified of

Plan

Family Notification (if

applicable)Family Notified of Plan

Social WorkIf Clinic initated: respite

maybe required.

PharmacyMedication Delivery

Coordination

Hospital ResourcesSchedule Resource &

Transport to CSCH

Outside ProvidersOutside Providers

Appointment

Complete Remainder

of Notifications

Send out Follow Up

Email when Complete

SIPOC

Participant Attending Center on an Unscheduled Day

Participant Needs to

Attend Day Center on

Unscheduled day due

to Clinic Appointment,

DME Need, or

Transport to Outside

Provider

Clinic Nurse/Tech (or

On Call Nurse) OR

Therapist (LPTA or

CODA) Initates

Telephone List

Satisfied Participant

with Immediate Future

Needs being Met.

Establish Pick Up/ Take

Home Times with

Transport Coordinator

44

Pareto Chart

• How do I do it?

– Decide on problem to be analyzed.

– Brainstorm or collect data to select problems or causes to be analyzed.

– Choose unit of measurement and timeframe for the study.

– Collect data (real time or historical).

– Compare relative frequency of each problem or cause.

– Graph the frequencies with a cumulative % line to interpret the results.

45

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Home NursingFacility

AssistedLiving

Community PACECenter

PACE Bus Dialysis Hospital

Cu

mu

lati

ve P

erce

nta

ge o

f Fa

lls

Nu

mb

er o

f Fa

lls

Location

Participant Falls at Lynchburg SiteJanuary 1, 2014 to December 31,2014

n=230

Number of Falls Percentage46

Data Analysis - Control Charts

• Graphical representation of data over time.

• Time ordered plot of a set of data in it’s naturally occurring order with the median of the data drawn in as a reference line.

• Ignoring the time element implicit in every data set can lead to incorrect statistical conclusions.

47

Quality Improvement: Control Chart

Falls with Average and Control Limits

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Jan-

00

Mar

-00

May

-00

Jul-0

0

Sep-0

0

Nov-00

Jan-

01

Mar

-01

May

-01

Jul-0

1

Sep-0

1

Nov-01

Falls

Average

Upper Control Limit

Lower Control Limit

48

49

Root Cause Analysis

• Fishbone Diagrams

• Show the causes of a certain event.

A Fishbone or Ishikawa diagram

can be useful to break down (in

successive layers of detail) root

causes that potentially contribute to

a particular effect.

49

50

Weight Loss

Fishbone Diagram

50

51

Weight Loss

Type of Patient

Dietary Staffing

CNA assistance with meals

Food Not Appetizing

Fishbone Diagram

51

52

Weight Loss

Type of Patient

Hospice

Obese patient

on dietOrtho

Rehab

Dietary Staffing

Holiday call-offs

Wages not competitive

New

Dietician

CNA assistance with meals

Short staffed

Wages not competitive

Holiday call-offs

Inadequate

training

Lack of

interest

High toileting needs

Don’t understand

importance

Food Not Appetizing

Monotonous Menu

Wrong Temperature

Poor presentation

Fishbone Diagram

52