44
The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress. Eric Schmidt, Kate Ward, Jennifer Gregg, Jesse Tarango, and Tommy VanVeghel San José State University

The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

  • Upload
    vince

  • View
    48

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress. Eric Schmidt, Kate Ward, Jennifer Gregg, Jesse Tarango, and Tommy VanVeghel. San José State University. The Diabetes Epidemic. In U.S. alone, 24+ million (CDC, 2007/2008) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between

Depression, Diabetes, and Stress.

Eric Schmidt, Kate Ward, Jennifer Gregg, Jesse Tarango, and

Tommy VanVeghel

San José State University

Page 2: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

The Diabetes Epidemic

• In U.S. alone, 24+ million (CDC, 2007/2008)

– Diagnosable diabetes > 8% of U.S. population– Another 57 million with pre-diabetes

• 250+ million worldwide (WHO, 2009)

– 7 million/year increase in cases– Causes 5% of deaths globally – Number of deaths to double by 2030

• Still uncertain etiology in Type 2 Diabetes– Population rates related to obesity

Page 3: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

1994

Page 4: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

1995

Page 5: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

1996

Page 6: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

1997

Page 7: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

1998

Page 8: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

1999

Page 9: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2000

Page 10: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2001

Page 11: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2002

Page 12: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2003

Page 13: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2004

Page 14: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2005

Page 15: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2006

Page 16: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2007

Page 17: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2008

Page 18: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics

Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2) Diabetes

<4.5%Missing data4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4%7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0%

18.0 -21.9%<14.0%Missing Data

14.0 - 17.9%22.0 - 25.9% ≥26.0%

Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes

2008

Page 19: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Depression and Diabetes

Those with comorbid Diabetes and Depression• Show less adherence to prescription regimen• Tend to partake in fewer self-management activities• Are at increased risk for undesirable and preventable

medical outcomes and mortality(Gonzalez et al., 2007; Ciechanowski et al., 2000; Lin et al., 2004; Kalsekar et al., 2006; Katon et al., 2005; Katon et

al., 2009)

• People with Diabetes at 1.6-2.0x risk for Depression (Anderson et al., 2001; Ali et al., 2006)

• No difference has been reported (Téllez-Zenteno et al., 2002)

• People with Depression at 23-37% increased risk for developing Diabetes (Knol et al., 2006; Brown et al., 2005)

Page 20: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Depression, Stress, & Diabetes

• Stress – “Perceived Stress” – Acute stressors and Allostatic Load

• Depression and Stress correlated– Stress also important in chronic disease– Self-Management & Adherence linked with blood

sugar control– Blood sugar control linked with medical

outcomes and mortality in diabetes

Page 21: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Cortisol, Diabetes, & Depression

• Stress biomedically related to diabetes in a way we don’t often see with psychological disorders– Affects behavior (self-management, etc.)– But *also* matters biologically

• Cortisol related to “Fight or Flight”– Related to both Stress and Depression– Activation of HPA Axis, inhibits insulin action– Increased blood sugar levels– Increased risk for undesirable medical outcomes

Page 22: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Previous ResearchSacco et al. (2005, 2007) • Self-Efficacy mediates adherence and depression

Doesn’t give us a way to intervene within the model• “…enhancing adherence in people with diabetes should

enhance their physical and mental health by reducing depressive symptoms.”

• Recommend emphasis on diet and exercise adherence

Adherence Depression-0.35* -0.38*

2005 2007 * p < .01 † p = n.s.

Self-Efficacy

Adherence Depression

0.74*0.74*

-0.41*-0.38*

† †

Page 23: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

But From an ACT PerspectiveSacco et al. (2005, 2007) • Self-Efficacy mediates adherence and depression

Doesn’t give us a way to intervene within the model• “…enhancing adherence in people with diabetes should

enhance their physical and mental health by reducing depressive symptoms.”

• Recommend emphasis on diet and exercise adherence

Adherence Depression-0.35* -0.38*

2005 2007 * p < .01 † p = n.s.

Self-Efficacy

Adherence Depression

0.74*0.74*

-0.41*-0.38*

† †

Page 24: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

But From an ACT PerspectiveSacco et al. (2005, 2007) • Self-Efficacy mediates adherence and depression

Doesn’t give us a way to intervene within the model• Adherence is still the problem!!• We already know that adherence efforts don’t work consistently

Adherence Depression

Believability

Adherence DepressionDepression Adherence

?

? ?

Page 25: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

BelievabilityAn Intervention for Adherence• Varied levels of depression symptoms related to high

levels of non-adherence (Fisher et al., 2007; Gonzalez et al., 2007)

– Some patients “distressed,” not depressed

• Conflicting support for Depression as predictor in mediation, and relationship remains complicated (McKellar et al., 2004; Gregg et al., 2010)

– Insulin vs. medication adherence (Aikens et al., 2008)

– Gender differences (Nau et al., 2007)

Need interventions that provide patients with behavioral tools delivered within the diabetes self-management and depression relationship.

Page 26: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Research Questions

1. Does Believability of Negative Thoughts mediate relationship between Adherence to diabetes self-management and Depression?

2. Does Believability of Negative Thoughts mediate the relationship between Adherence to diabetes self-management and Stress?

Page 27: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Methods

• Cross-sectional internet-based survey• Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

(N=171)◦ Diabetes-specific discussion boards, websites, and forums◦ $5 Amazon.com gift card

• Depression, Stress, Diabetes Self-Care• Exclusions: Duplicate IP address,

International, Entries not referring to Diabetes, Pregnant, Eating Disorder (N=34)

Page 28: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Methods - Measures

• Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ-B)– “Believability” or Cognitive Fusion

• Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

• Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

• Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities – “Adherence”– Diet and exercise focus– E.g., “On how many of the last 7 days did you eat your

recommended number of vegetables?”

Page 29: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Methods: Mediation Analysis

1. Adherence predicts Stress

2. Believability predicts Stress

3. Adherence predicts Believability

4. Statistically significant reduction of the predictive power of Adherence on Stress when Believability is controlled

Believability

Adherence Stress

Proposed Model

Page 30: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Research Question 1

Depression Model• Believability of Negative Thoughts mediates

Adherence and Depression (Gregg et al., 2010)– Model not significant with Depression as predictor

Believability

Adherence Depression

-0.24** 0.48***

-0.37***

* p < .01 ** p < .001

Page 31: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Research Question 1

Depression Model• Believability of Negative Thoughts mediates

Adherence and Depression (Gregg et al., 2010)– Model not significant with Depression as predictor

Believability

Adherence Depression

-0.24** 0.48***

-0.37***

Believability

Adherence Depression

-0.24** 0.42***

-0.27**

* p < .01 ** p < .001

Page 32: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Research Question 1

Depression Model• Believability of Negative Thoughts mediates

Adherence and Depression (Gregg et al., 2010)– Model not significant with Depression as predictor

Believability

Adherence Depression

-0.24** 0.48***

-0.37***

Believability

Adherence Depression

-0.24** 0.42***

-0.27**

β = −.270, t (121) = -3.428, p < .01Sobel = 2.43, p = .015* p < .01 ** p < .001

Page 33: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Results: Stress Model

Believability

Adherence Stress

Proposed Model

Adherence Stress

Believability Stress

β = −.279, t (119) = -3.182, p = .002

Adherence Believability

β = .306, t (119) = 3.574, p = .001

β = −.240, t (119) = -2.711, p = .008

Depression Stressr = .219 p = .01

MeasuresStress: Perceived Stress ScaleBelievability: Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire - BAdherence: Summary of Diabetes Self-Care ActivitiesDepression: Beck Depression Inventory

Page 34: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Results: Stress Model

Believability

Adherence Stress

-0.24** 0.31***

-0.28**

*p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001

• Believability of Negative Thoughts mediated Adherence and Perceived Stress– Partial mediation with Believability for Stress, Depression, and

Adherence

Page 35: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Results: Stress Model

Believability

Adherence Stress

-0.24** 0.31***

-0.28**

Believability

Adherence Stress

-0.24** 0.33***

-0.20*

*p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001

• Believability of Negative Thoughts mediated Adherence and Perceived Stress– Partial mediation with Believability for Stress, Depression, and

Adherence

Page 36: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Results: Stress Model

Believability

Adherence Stress

-0.24** 0.31***

-0.28**

Believability

Adherence Stress

-0.24** 0.33***

-0.20*

β = −.200, t (119) = -2.337, p = .021Sobel = 2.184, p = .029*p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001

• Believability of Negative Thoughts mediated Adherence and Perceived Stress– Partial mediation with Believability for Stress, Depression, and

Adherence

Page 37: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Discussion• Depression and Stress related to Adherence• Believability mediated both relationships

– Adherence → Depression– Adherence → Stress– Depression and Stress correlated

• Contributes to the viability of Believability as a clinical target in this population– ACT for Clinically Depressed patients with Diabetes– Principles of ACT incorporated into Diabetes Education

• Gregg et al. (2007) reported more desirable blood sugar and self-management at 3 months in group receiving 1-day ACT with Diabetes Education

Page 38: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

Future Research

• Limitations– Cross-Sectional Data– Internet-Based (benefit?)– Self-Report– Strength of Relationships

• Future Research– Are these models bi-directional? Causation?– Do these models represent distinct sub-populations?– Can ACT principles lead to benefits in Diabetes self-

management at various stages of diabetes and psychological flexibility?

ATQ-Frequency

ATQ-Believability

r = .569***

For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at [email protected]

Page 39: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

ReferencesAli, S., Stone, M.A., Peters, J.L., Davies, M.J., & Kunti, K. (2006). The prevalence of co-morbid

depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 23, 1165-1173.

Anderson, R.J., Feedland, K.E., Clouse, R.E., & Lustman, P.J. (2001). The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24, 1069-1078.

Brown, L.C., Majumdar, S.R., Newman, S.C., & Johnson, J.A. (2005). History of depression increases risk of type 2 diabetes in younger adults. Diabetes Care, 28, 1063-1067.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007). National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008.

Ciechanowski, P.S., Katon, W.J., & Russo, J.E. (2000). Depression and diabetes: Impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 3278-3285.

Fisher, L., Skaff, M.M., Mullan, J.T., Arean, P., Mohr, D., Masharani, U., et al. (2007). Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes. Not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care, 30, 542-548.

Gonzalez, J.S., Safren, S.A., Cagliero, E., Wexler, D.J., Delahanty, L., Wittenberg, E. et al. (2007). Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30, 2222-2227.

For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at [email protected]

Page 40: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

ReferencesGregg, J.A., Callaghan, G.M., Hayes, S.C., & Glenn-Lawson, J.L. (2007). Improving diabetes

self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 336-343.

Gregg, J.A., Schmidt, E.S., Ward, K.C., Almada, P., & Knezevich, P. (2010). An alternative model for understanding the diabetes-depression relationship: The mediational role of thought believability. Journal of Behavioral Health and Medicine, 1 (1), 15-23.

Kalsekar, I.D., Madhavan, S.S., Amonkar, M.M., Makela, E.H., Scott, V.G., Douglas, S.M., et al. (2006). Depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: Impact on adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 40, 605-611.

Katon, W.J., Rutter, C., Simon, G., Lin, E.H.B., Ludman, E., Ciechanowski, P. et al. (2005). The association of comorbid depression with mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28, 2668-2672.

Katon, W., Russo, J., Lin, E.H.G., Heckbert, S.R., Karter, A.J., Williams, L.H., et al. (2009). Diabetes and poor disease control: Is comorbid depression associated with poor medication adherence or lack of treatment intensification? Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 965-972.

Knol, M.J., Twisk, J.W.R, Beekman, A.T.F., Heine, R.J. Snoek, F.J., & Pouwer, F. (2006). Depression as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis. Diabetologia, 49, 837-845.

For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at [email protected]

Page 41: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

ReferencesLin, E.H.B., Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C., Simon, G.E., Oliver, M., et al. (2004).

Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. Diabetes Care, 27, 2154-2160.

Nau, D.P., Aikens, J.E., & Pacholski, A.M. (2007). Effects of gender and depression on oral medication adherence in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Gender Medicine, 4, 205-213.

Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Vaughan, C.A., Friedman, A., Perez, S., & Matthew, R. (2005). Depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: The role of adherence, body mass index, and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 24, 630-634.

Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Friedman, A., Matthew, R., Perez, S., & Vaughan, C.A. (2007). Adherence, body mass index, and depression in type 2 diabetes: The mediational role of diabetes symptoms and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 26, 693-700.

Téllez-Zenteno, J.F., & Cardiel, M.H. (2002). Risk factors associated with depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Archives of Medical Research, 33 (1), 53-60.

World Health Organization (2009). Diabetes fact sheet. No 312. WHO Statistical Information System, Global Burden of Disease Project. Available at http://www.who.int/diabetes/facts/en/index.html, downloaded May 15, 2010.

For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at [email protected]

Page 42: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

ReferencesAli, S., Stone, M.A., Peters, J.L., Davies, M.J., & Kunti, K. (2006). The prevalence of co-morbid

depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 23, 1165-1173.

Anderson, R.J., Feedland, K.E., Clouse, R.E., & Lustman, P.J. (2001). The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24, 1069-1078.

Brown, L.C., Majumdar, S.R., Newman, S.C., & Johnson, J.A. (2005). History of depression increases risk of type 2 diabetes in younger adults. Diabetes Care, 28, 1063-1067.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007). National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008.

Ciechanowski, P.S., Katon, W.J., & Russo, J.E. (2000). Depression and diabetes: Impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 3278-3285.

Fisher, L., Skaff, M.M., Mullan, J.T., Arean, P., Mohr, D., Masharani, U., et al. (2007). Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes. Not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care, 30, 542-548.

Gonzalez, J.S., Safren, S.A., Cagliero, E., Wexler, D.J., Delahanty, L., Wittenberg, E. et al. (2007). Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30, 2222-2227.

For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at [email protected]

Page 43: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

ReferencesGregg, J.A., Callaghan, G.M., Hayes, S.C., & Glenn-Lawson, J.L. (2007). Improving diabetes

self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 336-343.

Gregg, J.A., Schmidt, E.S., Ward, K.C., Almada, P., & Knezevich, P. (2010). An alternative model for understanding the diabetes-depression relationship: The mediational role of thought believability. Journal of Behavioral Health and Medicine, 1 (1), 15-23.

Kalsekar, I.D., Madhavan, S.S., Amonkar, M.M., Makela, E.H., Scott, V.G., Douglas, S.M., et al. (2006). Depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: Impact on adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 40, 605-611.

Katon, W.J., Rutter, C., Simon, G., Lin, E.H.B., Ludman, E., Ciechanowski, P. et al. (2005). The association of comorbid depression with mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28, 2668-2672.

Katon, W., Russo, J., Lin, E.H.G., Heckbert, S.R., Karter, A.J., Williams, L.H., et al. (2009). Diabetes and poor disease control: Is comorbid depression associated with poor medication adherence or lack of treatment intensification? Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 965-972.

Knol, M.J., Twisk, J.W.R, Beekman, A.T.F., Heine, R.J. Snoek, F.J., & Pouwer, F. (2006). Depression as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis. Diabetologia, 49, 837-845.

For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at [email protected]

Page 44: The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress

ReferencesLin, E.H.B., Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C., Simon, G.E., Oliver, M., et al. (2004).

Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. Diabetes Care, 27, 2154-2160.

Nau, D.P., Aikens, J.E., & Pacholski, A.M. (2007). Effects of gender and depression on oral medication adherence in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Gender Medicine, 4, 205-213.

Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Vaughan, C.A., Friedman, A., Perez, S., & Matthew, R. (2005). Depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: The role of adherence, body mass index, and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 24, 630-634.

Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Friedman, A., Matthew, R., Perez, S., & Vaughan, C.A. (2007). Adherence, body mass index, and depression in type 2 diabetes: The mediational role of diabetes symptoms and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 26, 693-700.

Téllez-Zenteno, J.F., & Cardiel, M.H. (2002). Risk factors associated with depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Archives of Medical Research, 33 (1), 53-60.

World Health Organization (2009). Diabetes fact sheet. No 312. WHO Statistical Information System, Global Burden of Disease Project. Available at http://www.who.int/diabetes/facts/en/index.html, downloaded May 15, 2010.

For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at [email protected]