8
The Role of VUV Radiation in the Inactivation of Bacteria with an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet Simon Schneider, Jan-Wilm Lackmann, Dirk Ellerweg, Benjamin Denis, Franz Narberhaus, Julia E. Bandow, Jan Benedikt* 1. Introduction Cold atmospheric pressure plasmas (CAP) are increasingly in the focus of researchers investigating their possible applications in medicine or the food packaging industry. [1,2] CAP jets are able to inactivate bacteria or fungi or damage bio-macromolecules. [3–5] They offer an alternative to standard sterilization methods where thermo-labile and vacuum-sensitive objects (plastics or living tissues) have to be treated. In addition, several studies investigate the influence of CAP treatment on wound healing and cancer cells. [6,7] These plasmas produce positive and negative ions, (V)UV radiation, and reactive radical species, which interact Full Paper S. Schneider, D. Ellerweg, Prof. J. Benedikt Coupled Plasma-Solid State Systems, Department for Physics und Astronomy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universita ¨tsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany E-mail: [email protected] J.-W. Lackmann, Prof. F. Narberhaus, Prof. J. E. Bandow Microbial Biology, Department for Biology und Biotechnology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universita ¨tsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany B. Denis Institute for Electrical Engineering and Plasma Technology, Ruhr- University Bochum, Universita ¨tsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany A modified version of a microscale atmospheric pressure plasma jet (m-APPJ) source, so-called X-Jet, is used to study the role of plasma-generated VUV photons in the interaction of bacteria. The new jet geometry allows effective separation of reactive particles (O atoms or O 3 molecules) from the plasma-generated photons. The measurements of the size of inhibition zones formed in the layer of vegetative Escherichia coli bacteria, VUV emis- sion intensity, and the mass spectrometry measurements show that photochemistry in the gas phase followed by photochemistry products impacting on bacteria is more effective in bacterial inactivation than direct VUV radi- ation damage. Protonated water cluster ions are detected indicating that water impurity has to be considered care- fully. The combination of the presence of water cluster ions and O 2 molecules at the surface leads to the strongest effect. Additionally, the interaction of plasma-generated VUV photons with the effluent of the He/O 2 plasma, but not with ground state O 2 , leads to faster inactivation of bacteria, most probably due to enhanced formation of O and O 3 . Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000 ß 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlinelibrary.com DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100102 1 Early View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R

The Role of VUV Radiation in the Inactivation of Bacteria with an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Full Paper

The Role of VUV Radiation in the Inactivationof Bacteria with an Atmospheric PressurePlasma Jet

Simon Schneider, Jan-Wilm Lackmann, Dirk Ellerweg, Benjamin Denis,Franz Narberhaus, Julia E. Bandow, Jan Benedikt*

A modified version of a microscale atmospheric pressure plasma jet (m-APPJ) source, so-calledX-Jet, is used to study the role of plasma-generated VUV photons in the interaction of bacteria.The new jet geometry allows effective separation of reactive particles (O atoms or O3

molecules) from the plasma-generated photons. Themeasurements of the size of inhibition zones formed inthe layer of vegetative Escherichia coli bacteria, VUV emis-sion intensity, and the mass spectrometry measurementsshow that photochemistry in the gas phase followed byphotochemistry products impacting on bacteria is moreeffective in bacterial inactivation than direct VUV radi-ation damage. Protonated water cluster ions are detectedindicating that water impurity has to be considered care-fully. The combination of the presence of water cluster ionsand O2 molecules at the surface leads to the strongesteffect. Additionally, the interaction of plasma-generatedVUV photons with the effluent of the He/O2 plasma, butnot with ground state O2, leads to faster inactivation ofbacteria, most probably due to enhanced formation of Oand O3.

S. Schneider, D. Ellerweg, Prof. J. BenediktCoupled Plasma-Solid State Systems, Department for Physics undAstronomy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitatsstraße 150,44780 Bochum, GermanyE-mail: [email protected]. Lackmann, Prof. F. Narberhaus, Prof. J. E. BandowMicrobial Biology, Department for Biology und Biotechnology,Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitatsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum,GermanyB. DenisInstitute for Electrical Engineering and Plasma Technology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitatsstraße 150, 44780 Bochum,Germany

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim wileyonlin

Early View Publication; these are NOT the

1. Introduction

Cold atmospheric pressure plasmas (CAP) are increasingly

in the focus of researchers investigating their possible

applications in medicine or the food packaging industry.[1,2]

CAP jets are able to inactivate bacteria or fungi or damage

bio-macromolecules.[3–5] They offer an alternative to

standard sterilization methods where thermo-labile and

vacuum-sensitive objects (plastics or living tissues) have to

be treated. In addition, several studies investigate the

influence of CAP treatment on wound healing and cancer

cells.[6,7] These plasmas produce positive and negative ions,

(V)UV radiation, and reactive radical species, which interact

elibrary.com DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100102 1

final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R

2

REa

S. Schneider et al.

with the treated surface. The effects of different plasma-

generated species on the treated systems are a topic of

current scientific discussion.[1] The role of reactive oxygen

species (ROS) has been stressed by several authors as key

particles affecting vegetative prokaryotic and eukaryotic

cells.[8,9] More recently, the combination of ions and ROS has

also been discussed.[2,10] Capacitively coupled atmospheric

pressure plasma jet (APPJ) sources operated with He with

some addition of O2 (�1%) are known to be efficient sources

of ROS, particularly oxygen atoms, ozone molecules (O3), or

singlet delta oxygen metastables O2(a1Dg). Measurements

and modeling have been reported for a coaxial jet with a

1 cm diameter inner electrode and a 1 mm electrode gap, a

parallel plate jet with 1 mm electrode separation and 1 mm

electrode width, or for sources with an electrode width

larger than 1 mm.[11–15] The plasma dynamics and plasma

chemistry in these discharges have also been modeled by

several authors.[16,17] These works show that densities of

above mentioned ROS are around 1015 cm�3 in the effluent

of these jets and can be tuned by adjusting O2 concentra-

tion, applied power, gas flow, and jet-substrate distance.

This kind of plasma is a promising tool for treatment of

living tissues or for antibacterial treatment of surfaces at

atmospheric pressure. The knowledge of ROS densities and,

therefore, also the fluxes could be used to evaluate

quantitatively the effects of ROS, for example, on vegetative

bacteria. With respect to the surface being treated, these

sources are remote sources, where the plasma is confined

between electrodes and mainly neutral plasma effluent

without short-lived reactive species reaches the surface.

The absence of direct contact of plasma with the treated

surface makes the treatment of bacteria or living tissues

probably less effective compared to sources generating

plasma in direct contact with the substrate. However,

it will be shown that these sources allow the fundamental

study of the effects of different plasma components

on the living cells. An unknown factor in the treatment

is the effect of VUV photons, which are produced in

the plasma in addition to heavy reactive particles.

These photons can propagate unabsorbed through

He atmosphere, irradiate the treated surface, and induce

uncontrolled radiation damage. We report in this article the

results of a study on the role of VUV photons in inactivation

of vegetative Escherichia coli bacteria. This study is

performed with a modified microplasma jet, which

allows well-defined separation of plasma-generated VUV

photons and reactive particles.

Figure 1. (a) Photograph of the m-APPJ source with two crossedchannels after the nozzle, the X-Jet modification. Additional He(or He/O2) flow diverts the plasma effluent into the side channel.VUV and UV photons propagate in line-of-sight with the plasmathrough the direct channel. (b) Schematic representation of thegas flows and photon flux in the channel structure. The overlap ofthe blue line with the pink region is the area, where the photo-chemistry takes place.

2. Experimental Section

The m-APPJ has a very simple geometry. It is formed by two

stainless steel electrodes (length 30 mm and thickness 1 mm)

with a separation of 1 mm, and two glass plates, which are

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

rly View Publication; these are NOT the fina

glued to the electrodes on the side and confine the inter electrode

volume. The well-controlled flow conditions without admixture

of surrounding ambient atmosphere and a very good optical

access to the plasma is maintained in this way. The plasma is

generated in He gas flow of up to five standard liters per minute

(slm) with small concentrations (<1.5%) of some reactive gas

(in this case O2). A typical a-mode discharge is formed when a

sinusoidal driving voltage with a root-mean-square value of 150–

270 V (frequency 13.56 MHz) is applied to the electrodes. This

source has been described and studied in the past and quantitative

measurements of O and O3 densities as function of O2 concentra-

tion, applied power, and distance to the jet are available.[11,18,19]

Additionally, this jet geometry with He/O2 gas mixture has been

modeled and discussed in the literature.[16,17] The gas temperature

in the plasma effluent has also been measured for a 1% O2

admixture and it was below 34 8C.[11] The temperature is slightly

higher at lower O2 concentrations but drops quickly as the

distance from the jet increases.

A modified m-APPJ, a so-called X-Jet, is used in this work.

The nozzle of the m-APPJ is extended by two crossed channels

as shown in a photograph in Figure 1a. These channels

are formed from glass and metal building blocks with 1 mm

thickness, and fixed between two glass plates together with

both electrodes. One channel is a direct extension of the inter-

electrode region (direct channel) and the other channel (side

channel) crosses the direct channel under a 458 angle 3 mm

downstream of the end of the electrodes. Both channels have the

same 1�1 mm2 cross-section. An additional He flow is applied to

the side channel to divert particles in the plasma effluent from

the direct channel into the side channel. This is possible, because

the particle transport is controlled mainly by convection at

atmospheric pressure and the flow velocities used. The diffusion

is less important due to high collision rates. Contrary to particles,

VUV and UV photons generated in the plasma can propagate

DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100102

l page numbers, use DOI for citation !!

The Role of VUV Radiation in the Inactivation . . .

further through the direct channel (also filled with He), cf. the

scheme in Figure 1b. Only a very small fraction (<1.5%) of photons is

reflected or scattered into the side channel. Therefore, operation of

the X-Jet with additional He flow through the side channel leads to

effective separation of the plasma-generated reactive particles (e.g.,

O atoms or O3 molecules emanating from the side channel) and

plasma-generated photons, which propagate through the direct

channel. Additionally, the experiments are performed in a chamber

with controlled He atmosphere (volume �8 L) to minimize the

influence of ambient atmosphere. The substrate was always placed

perpendicular to the axis of the corresponding channel used for

treatment at a distance of 4 mm. The details regarding the

separation of reactive particles and photons, the results of the

simulation of the convection/diffusion transport in the X-Jet, and

the testing of the X-Jet performance in etching experiments of

plasma polymer films, emission spectroscopy measurements in the

115–875 nm wavelength range, as well as treatment of bacteria in

their vegetative form can be found elsewhere.[20]

Combined and separate effects of the reactive heavy particles

and the VUV and UV radiation of the plasma effluent on bacteria

or other substrates can now be studied in the following ways:

(i) Photons and reactive particles are applied together: an X-Jet

without additional He flow in the side channel will result in the

transport of both reactive particles and photons through the direct

channel. The gas flow simulation indicates that 20% of the gas

flow exits through the side channel resulting in a slightly longer

residence time of the species in the direct channel after the crossing

and the loss of some O and O3 through this channel. (ii) Reactive

particles only: the same He flow is used in both channels. The

additional flow through the side channel will push the heavy

particles from the plasma effluent into the side channel as

demonstrated in Figure 1b. The flow rates through both

channels after the crossing are the same due to the symmetry of

this geometry. The flux of ROS at the exit of the side channel is

expected to be similar to the ROS flux at the direct channel

in (i), although some differences will occur due to slightly

different residence times as discussed above, due to missing

photodissociation and excitation of the particles in the effluent

after the crossing of both channels (see also Section 2.4 of

E. coli treatment later) and due to slightly asymmetric velocity

fields across both channels in the case (ii). The plasma generated

VUV and UV photons cannot enter directly into side channel due to

geometry constrains, which is corroborated by measurements

presented later in this article. (iii) VUV and UV only: with the

additional He flow, only VUV and UV photons reach the treated

surface under the direct channel. Some ROS species will diffuse into

the direct channel (especially if the gas flows in both channels are

equal), but they will not reach the center of the gas flow in this

channel. Only the species close to the center, where the gas velocity is

the highest, are transported to the vicinity of the surface and can

reach the substrate. We have already discussed[20] that the species at

the periphery of the gas channel will be transported to the side from

the jet axis and not to the surface, the diffusion across the

streamlines is too slow for that. Additionally, a larger He flow in the

side channel can be used to make sure that no ROS from the plasma

diffuse into the direct channel. The He flow of 2 slm in the side

channel (compared to 1.4 slm through the plasma) was, therefore,

used in some investigations presented in this article.

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Early View Publication; these are NOT the

2.1. Measurement of Emission Intensity

A solar blind VUV and UV detector (PMT-142, effective in the 115–

450 nm wavelength range with a maximum relative efficiency at

around 220 nm) in an evacuated housing with MgF2 window has

been used to measure the wavelength integrated intensity of VUV

and UV emission from the direct channel of the X-Jet.[21] A 1 mm

diameter diaphragm was placed on the MgF2 window and the jet

was always at 4 mm distance from the window to maintain the

same acceptance angle for each measurement. The same setup

has been used in previous measurements to verify that the

photon flux (in this wavelength range) through the side channel is

negligible.[20]

2.2. Molecular Beam Mass Spectrometry

Measurements

A molecular beam mass spectrometry (MS) sampling system is

used to check the presence of O atoms and O3 molecules and to

detect positive ions in the gas phase. The three-stage differentially

pumped MS sampling system described previously is used for

these measurements.[19,22] This system is equipped with a rotating

chopper to modulate the molecular beam and maintain vacuum

in the MS. However, this chopper was not used here for the

detection of ions because a smaller sampling orifice (20 mm

diameter) was installed. The X-Jet is placed into a small chamber

with controlled He atmosphere, which is mounted directly at

the mass spectrometer front plate with the sampling orifice.

Comparable conditions as during the treatment of bacteria are

arranged in this way.

2.3. Preparation of Biological Probes

Vegetative E. coli cells have been used as model substrate in this

study. E. coli K12 liquid cultures (American Type Culture Collection,

Acces. Number 10798) were incubated for 18 h overnight at 37 8C in

LB medium.[23] The cultures were diluted to an optical density of

0.05 at 580 nm and were sprayed onto LB agar plates for 1 s. A low

surface coverage with �2.2�103 � cm�2 cell density was achieved

in this case with well-separated individual cells. This cell density is

the minimal density necessary to obtain homogeneous surface

coverage after the incubation. Even small changes in cell density

due to treatment with the plasma jet were therefore visible. The

low cell density also minimizes the possible effect of one cell

shadowing another, which has to be considered in the case of a

multilayer or clusters of cells at the surface. The plates were

incubated for 1 h at 37 8C before plasma treatment. After plasma

treatment, the sample plates were incubated overnight for 18 h at

37 8C to allow survivors to grow. Untreated plates and controls

without any effect were covered by a homogeneous layer of

bacteria, whereas, zones of inhibition formed where treatment was

lethal. The incubated agar plates were scanned afterwards on a

digital color scanner to document the final effect of treatment on

bacterial survival. Each treatment was repeated in three indepen-

dent experiments. The effect of treatment was reproducible and

representative results for each condition are shown here.

www.plasma-polymers.org 3

final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R

4

REa

S. Schneider et al.

It was checked that prolonged treatment of the agar plates with

(i) gas flow without plasma or (ii) with RF electromagnetic fields

generated by electrodes without plasma and without gas flows

(plasma does not ignite without He between the electrodes) has no

visible effect on bacteria. The treatment of agar plates with plasma

before application of cells had no effect on bacterial growth.

Furthermore, the pH change of the medium has been checked.

Liquid pH color indicator (Sigma–Aldrich) was either added on top

of the agar plate after plasma treatment or mixed into the warm LB-

agar solution into Petri dishes to test for plasma-mediated changes

of pH values. A pH change would be indicated by a change in color of

the indicator reagent. No color changes were observed even after

30 min of plasma treatment.

We report in the following results of treatment of vegetative

E. coli bacteria with different components of the plasma effluent.

The main focus is on the role of VUV and UV photons in the

inactivation of bacteria.

2.4. Experimental Results and Discussion

The advantage of the X-Jet is that it allows us to separate the effects

of plasma-generated VUV and UV photons from the effects induced

by reactive particles (O3, O, impurities, etc.). The effects of VUV and

UV photons only, reactive particles only, and photons and reactive

particles together have already been studied in E. coli and selected

results are shown in Figure 2.[20] The following observations have

been made: (i) The VUV and UV photons generated in plasma had

only a weak effect on E. coli survival. No inactivation was visible in

samples treated with the direct channel for 1 and 3 min. The zone of

Figure 2. 40 mm� 40 mm details of photographs of Petri disheswith zones of inhibition in E. coli monolayers after 1, 3, and 6 minof treatment with reactive particles only, VUV and UV photonsonly, or treatment with both combined. Details marked by �: theentire plate (80 mm diameter) was affected. Adopted fromref.[20]. Plasma conditions: URMS¼ 230 V, He flow through plasma1.4 slm, O2 concentration in the direct channel 0.6%, He flowthrough the side channel 0, or 1.4 slm.

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

rly View Publication; these are NOT the fina

inhibition at the jet axis appeared only after 6 min of treatment

with photons. (ii) The combined treatment and reactive particle-

only treatment showed typical dose–effect relationships.

Elongated treatment times resulted in larger zones of inhibition

and lower numbers of colony forming units. In both cases, the

whole area of the Petri dish (80 mm diameter) was affected after

3 min of treatment. (iii) Inactivation by the combined treatment

was approximately twice as fast as with the reactive particle-only

treatment (cf. Figure 2). The fast inactivation by the reactive

particle-only and by the combined treatment is due to the fact that

the m-APPJ is an effective source of atomic oxygen and ozone. For

example, the densities (concentrations) of O and O3 measured by

molecular beam MS at 4 mm distance from the jet under conditions

used in this work are 7� 1014 cm�3 (�28 ppm) and 5� 1014 cm�3

(�20 ppm), respectively.[19] The concentration of ozone increases

with the distance and reaches �56 ppm at 50 mm. The concentra-

tions of both O and O3 can be expected to be high enough to cause

the observed effects. Ozone is known for its bactericidal activity.

Just 5 min of treatment with 0.2 ppm of ozone in water is lethal for

E. coli, Bacillus cereus, or Bacillus megaterium.[24] Moreover,

experiments in air with ozone have shown that it also effectively

kills bacteria on agar plates. Ozone concentrations below 1 ppm

and treatment times shorter than 100 min have been reported[25] to

be effective in killing Staphylococcus albus, Streptococcus salivarius,

and Bacillus prodigiosus. The higher doses of airborne ozone (300–

1 500 ppm) have been tested and proven to be effective against

E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus with rates on the time scale of few

tens of seconds.[26] Atomic oxygen also has detrimental effects on

bacteria. It can etch biological material or cause oxidative stress

inside the cell. We have shown that the flux of atomic oxygen from

the side channel of the X-Jet etches a BSA protein layer or a model

plasma polymer film of hydrogenated amorphous carbon with a

rate of 30 nm/min and that the area on the surface, which is

affected by atomic oxygen, is limited to a diameter of�10 mm.[20,27]

This limitation is given by the fast loss of O in the gas phase in the

three body reaction:[28]

l pag

Oþ O2 þHe! O3 þ He (1)

Regarding the fact that in treatments with reactive particles

longer than 6 min the whole Petri dish (80 mm diameter) was

affected and taking into account the short lifetime of O atoms, we

conclude that mainly O3 is responsible for the inactivation of

bacteria at large distances from the jet axis. Simultaneous action of

O, O3, O2 metastables, some possible impurities (like OH from

water), and in the case of combined treatment through the direct

channel, the VUV and UV radiation, most likely play a role in

bacterial inactivation near to the jet axis.[20]

An interesting effect, which is further studied and discussed in

this article, is the fact that the combined treatment is twice as fast

as the treatment with reactive particles without photons. More

effective inactivation was expected when reactive particles and

photons were treating the bacteria at the substrate simultaneously.

However, the simultaneous treatment is limited only to an area of

2–3 mm diameter just underneath the direct channel. The rest of

the substrate is shadowed by the channel structure and no

synergistic effects were expected there. However, Figure 2 shows

that the zone of inhibition of the combined treatment had a

DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100102

e numbers, use DOI for citation !!

The Role of VUV Radiation in the Inactivation . . .

diameter of 20 mm after 1 min of the treatment, whereas, the

treatment with reactive particles only resulted in a 5 mm diameter

after the same time. Additionally, the combined treatment at 3 min

has an effect comparable to the reactive particles-only treatment at

6 min. These observations indicate that the plasma effluent is

changed by the presence of VUV photons. Some photochemistry

reactions take place in the gas phase in the second part of the direct

channel and on the way to the substrate, which are missing in the

reactive particle-only treatment. The photochemistry of VUV

photons in the effluent of the He/O2 jets as an additional source

of O and subsequently O3 have been suggested and tested before

by Reuter et al.[12] and Reuter[13]. It could not be determined,

which reaction was responsible for this production, but the direct

photodissociation of O2 molecules has been proposed as a possible

explanation. The fact that the inactivation is accelerated at greater

distance from the jet axis indicates that additional ozone (and

additional O necessary for ozone formation) is indeed formed in the

effluent. The X-Jet geometry offers a unique opportunity to study

these effects in more detail.

2.5. Study of the Photochemistry in the X-Jet

The interaction of plasma-generated photons with O2 molecules in

the gas phase and its effects on bacteria can be studied by adding O2

at different concentrations into the He flow through the side

channel. Figure 3 shows the comparison of zones of inhibition

induced by photons only (He gas is supplied through the side

channel) and by photons and O2 photochemistry products (He gas

with admixture of O2 at different concentrations was fed through

Figure 3. 15 mm� 15 mm details of photographs of Petri disheswith zones of inhibition in E. coli monolayers after 1 and 4 min oftreatment. Cells were exposed to the effluent of the directchannel with different O2 concentrations added to the He flowfed through the side channel. The concentration of O2 in the Heflow through the side channel varied from 0 to 20%. Plasmaconditions: URMS¼ 230 V, He flow 1.4 slm, and O2 concentration0.6%. Total flow (HeþO2) through the side channel 2 slm.

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Early View Publication; these are NOT the

the side channel). Conditions in the plasma were the same (He gas

flow 1.4 slm, O2 concentration of 0.6%, URMS¼ 230 V). The gas flow

in the side channel was set to 2 slm to make sure that diffusion of

heavy reactive species from the plasma into the direct channel after

the channel crossing is negligible. Treatment times of 1 and 4 min

were used. No zone of inhibition was observed after 1 min of

treatment when no O2 is added into the He flow through the side

channel. A zone of inhibition with a 3.8 mm diameter appeared

after 4 min of treatment. These results are consistent with

observations presented in Figure 2 (photons-only conditions).

The addition of 0.8, 4.2 or 20% of O2 into the He gas flow through the

side channel and a treatment time of 1 min resulted in the

formation of zones of inhibition with diameters between 3 and

4 mm. No clear dependence on the amount of added O2 was

observed after 1 min of treatment. Diameters increased to 5, 6.5 and

8.5 mm in an O2 concentration-dependent manner after 4 min of

treatment. The same trend was also observed in several additional

measurements with different plasma conditions and gas flows. The

results shown in Figure 3 provide direct evidence that the combined

effects of UV and VUV photons and O2 molecules in the effluent of

the m-APPJ have a measurable effect on the inactivation of bacteria

on the time scales of minutes. However, the effect of this treatment

seems to be much more localized than the effect of the combined

treatment and the reactive particles-only treatment shown in

Figure 2. It should be stressed here that the frames are

40 mm� 40 mm large in Figure 2 and only 15 mm�15 mm large

in Figure 3.

The photodissociation of ground state O2 molecule can be

discussed now as a possible photochemistry reaction based on

these results and on known absolute photon fluxes available in the

literature. The photodissociation threshold of O2 molecules is

5.12 eV (wavelength 242.4 nm) and the photoionization threshold

12.07 eV (102.7 nm).[29] An absolutely calibrated emission spec-

trum of the jet has been measured in the past down to the

wavelength of 115 nm, the cut-off limit of the MgF2 window.[30]

Two atomic oxygen emission lines at 115 nm (1D–1Do) and 130 nm

(3P–3So) dominate the spectrum. Additionally, a weak emission due

to parts of the Schumann–Runge bands of O2 and a weak H line at

120 nm (2P–2So) has been observed. The photons with wavelengths

of 115 and 130 nm can dissociate O2 molecules. The photoabsorp-

tion cross-section (which is mainly due to photodissociation) of O2

has its maximum at 140 nm (2� 10�17 cm2), its value at 130 nm is

only �3�10�19 cm2.[29] The mean free path of 130 nm photons is,

therefore, more than 20 cm in He atmosphere with only 0.6% of O2.

This is corroborated by the measurements of the VUV emission

intensity by the solar blind detector sensitive in the 115–450 nm

wavelength range. The intensity is measured at the direct channel

of the X-Jet operated with the additional He flow through the side

channel. The change of the emission intensity in the 115–450 nm

wavelength range as function of the O2 concentration in the

additional He flow (O2 concentration in the plasma was kept

constant at 0.6%) is shown in Figure 4. Indeed, only�3% of the light

is absorbed on the 7 mm distance from the channel crossing to the

MgF2 window if 0.6% of O2 are added into the additional He flow.

The absorption increases almost linearly with increasing O2

concentration.

The radiances of about 10 mW �mm�2 � sr�1 were measured for

both atomic oxygen lines at the distance of 4 mm from the nozzle of

www.plasma-polymers.org 5

final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R

Figure 4. The change of the overall emission intensity in the 115–450 nm region, measured by solar blind UV and VUV detector, asfunction of the O2 concentration in the side channel. Experimen-tal conditions as in Figure 3.

Figure 5. 15 mm� 15 mm details of photographs of Petri disheswith inhibition zones in an E. coli monolayers after 1, 4 and 10 minof treatment. Cells were exposed to the plasma effluent passingthrough the direct channel allowing for photochemistry eventsby streaming He with O2 admixture though the side channel. Theconcentration of O2 in the He flow through the side channel(total flow 2 slm) varied from 0 to 4.2%. Plasma conditions:URMS¼ 200 V, He flow 1.4 slm, no O2 added.

6

REa

S. Schneider et al.

the m-APPJ operated with 0.6% of O2 in the gas mixture.[30] The

radiance increases at lower O2 concentrations in the plasma. It is

around 30 mW �mm�2 � sr�1 for the 115 nm line and around

15 mW �mm�2 � sr�1 for the 130 nm line at an O2 admixture of

0.1%.[30] 10 mW �mm�2 � sr�1 at 130 nm wavelength is approxi-

mately a photon flux of 4� 1013 cm�2 � s�1. The flux of O atoms to

the surface has been estimated before[20] to be around

8�1016 cm�2 � s�1. Even if we assume that each photon will result

in photodissociation of O2 and formation of two O atoms, the

photon-generated O flux (and subsequently also eventually the O3

flux) would be 3 orders of magnitude smaller than a plasma-

generated O flux (O3 flux). Taking into account that only a small

fraction of these photons is absorbed (see Figure 4) it is highly

probable that the photodissociation of the ground state O2

molecules by plasma-generated photons is not a major source of

additional O atoms and O3 molecules and it cannot explain the

enhanced inactivation rates observed in Figure 2. The possible

presence of O atoms and O3 molecules have also been checked by

the MBMS following the measurement procedure described

elsewhere.[19] Their densities underneath the direct channel under

the conditions of Figure 3 are below the detection limit of the MBMS

setup (�1�1014 cm�3 for O and �1�1013 cm�3 for O3).

Photons below the 115 nm threshold, which could unfortunately

not be measured with our diagnostics due to the cutting

wavelength of the MgF2 window, can be responsible for this effect.

The measurements of other authors on another plasma source

operated with He gas show that the He�2 excimer continuum in the

58–100 nm range or a strong atomic oxygen line at 98 nm can

radiate from the plasma.[31] Moreover, the absorption cross-section

for photoionization of O2 is�2�10�17 cm2 in the 30–100 nm range

giving a mean free path of around 3 mm in the gas mixture of He

with 0.6% of O2.[29] The following experiment has been performed

to get new insights into the photochemistry of O2 in the effluent.

The He gas without addition of O2 was used as a plasma forming gas

in the direct channel of the X-Jet. The excimer continuum is

expected to be the most intense in this case, because the quenching

of the He�2 in collisions with O2 molecules is reduced. Moreover,

no O3 is produced in the plasma. The chamber with controlled He

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

rly View Publication; these are NOT the fina

atmosphere is, therefore, not filled with O3, which otherwise

emanates from the side channel, and experiments with longer

exposure times can be performed. The He flow with variable

concentrations of O2 (total flow 2 slm) is used again in the side

channel of the X-Jet. E. coli bacteria are treated for 1, 4, and 10 min in

the same way as in Figure 3. The resulting zones of inhibition are

shown in Figure 5.

A very weak effect is seen in the case without O2 addition into

the side channel after 1 min of treatment on the area with a 3.2 mm

diameter. The effect gets stronger after 4 min, but the affected area

is similar in size. This observation can be explained by inactivation

of bacteria by absorbed VUV photons from the plasma. The fact that

some inactivation is seen already after 1 min, which was not the

case in Figure 2 and 3, indicates, that more VUV photons are emitted

from the plasma now. A relatively large area with a 7–8 mm

diameter is inactivated after 10 min of treatment, which cannot be

explained by the direct effect of photons only. Some reactive species

have to be generated in the gas phase (or eventually on the

irradiated surface) that are transported with the gas flow further

away from the axis of the direct channel as shown schematically by

blue arrows in Figure 1b.

Addition of O2 into the He flow in the side channel has the

following effects: (i) Faster inactivation on a larger area is visible

after 1 and 4 min of the treatment when compared to the He flow

without O2 addition. (ii) The affected area clearly increases with the

amount of O2 added. This effect is accompanied by a faster

inactivation rate. (iii) Surprisingly, a zone of inhibition with a

diameter of �7 mm and a very sharp boundary is formed after

10 min of treatment in all three cases. These results corroborate that

VUV photons generated by the plasma interact with molecules in

the gas phase or at the surface in such a way that resulting products

inactivate E. coli bacteria. O2 molecules are clearly involved in the

inactivation process or in the photochemistry, because the

observed effect is larger at higher O2 concentrations in the side

channel. However, the fact that prolonged treatment leads to

inactivation only on a limited area indicates that O atoms (which

would finally react with O2 and forming stable ozone) are not a

DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100102

l page numbers, use DOI for citation !!

The Role of VUV Radiation in the Inactivation . . .

product of this photochemistry. Generation of ozone during the

prolonged treatment would lead to inactivation on a much larger

area, as observed in Figure 2 for the combined treatment and

treatment with reactive particles only. This is clearly not the

case here. Moreover, the 7 mm diameter zone of inhibition is

formed even when no O2 is added into the gas flow. The

photoionization of O2 molecules and gas impurities (mainly water

molecules) is a plausible explanation of results in Figure 5. Ions

can be produced by VUV radiation, they have a short lifetime

due to the fast recombination with electrons (and can therefore

reach only a limited area on the surface, which will be similar

for all ions), and the results of others indicate that they can

inactivate bacteria.[10]

The molecular beam MS can be used to detect such ions. Figure 6

shows mass spectra of positive ions measured underneath the

direct channel under the conditions from Figure 5. The X-Jet was

placed into a small chamber with controlled He atmosphere to

simulate the conditions during the treatment of bacteria. The ion

spectra are for all conditions dominated by protonated water

clusters with four (mass: 73 amu) and five (mass: 91 amu) water

molecules. No or very weak signals only at the noise level (below

10 count � s�1) are detected below the mass of 70 amu. It is apparent

that water can be ionized effectively by VUV photons generated by

He plasma. It corroborates that VUV photons with wavelengths

shorter than 115 nm are generated. The water is an impurity in the

chamber and also in the gas lines and in the X-Jet (both during the

treatment of bacteria and during the MS measurements). It adsorbs

at the surface when the chamber is open and no gas flow is applied

and desorbs after the start of the experiment. The measurements

shown in Figure 6 are done just few minutes after closing the

chamber and the start of the gas flows and plasma (which is the

situation during the treatment of bacteria). The signal intensities of

all ions drop approximately 200 times within 1 h of continuous gas

flushing and plasma operation. Addition of O2 into the side channel

leads to higher relative intensities of water clusters with five water

Figure 6. MS measurement of positive ions at 4 mm distance fromthe end of the direct channel [cf. Figure 1b)] in the mass rangefrom 70 to 120 amu. The same conditions as in Figure 5 withthree different concentrations of O2 in the He flow through theside channel are compared.

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Early View Publication; these are NOT the

molecules (masses: 90 and 91) and of ions detected at masses of 95–

97 and 114–116. The overall signal is weaker for the conditions with

4.2% of O2 in the side channel, but part of this decrease is probably

due to decreasing water concentration in the system over time. A

signal at the mass 32 (Oþ2 ion) appears after the addition of O2

molecules into the side channel, but it is very weak at the level

below 10 counts � s�1. The direct photoionization of O2 molecules,

therefore, seems to play only a minor role. The MS measurements

can now be related to the results in Figure 5. The zone of inhibition

with 7 mm diameter after 10 min of treatment with He gas without

addition of O2 is probably a result of the presence of water, water

cluster ions, or eventually also water fragments (such as OH). These

ions or water fragments can be transported with the gas flow and,

therefore, reach areas which are not irradiated by the VUV photons.

The MS measurement does not show significant formation of new

positive ions (such as Oþ2 ) by addition of O2. Again, it seems that

direct photoionization of O2 plays only a minor role here. More

probably, the O2 molecules react in a synergistic manner at the

surface of bacteria together with ions and accelerate their

inactivation effect. This synergism would explain the faster

inactivation rate and larger inhibition zone diameters after 1

and 4 min of treatment but the same diameter after 10 min. This

observation corroborates the results of Dobrynin et al.,[10] who

concluded that ions in the presence of oxygen (or ROS) have the

highest efficiency to inactivate bacteria. It is also in agreement with

their conclusion that the presence of non-liquid water leads to the

fastest inactivation. In our case, water which is ionized by the VUV

radiation can originate directly from the surface of the wet agar

medium or vegetative bacteria. We stress here that the interaction

of plasma-generated VUV photons with ground state O2 molecules

does not lead to formation of O atoms and O3 molecules and

does not explain the effect observed in Figure 2. The enhanced

production of O and O3 in the effluent of the He/O2 plasma in the

combined treatment is very likely caused by the photodissociation

of some other plasma-generated oxygen-containing species. These

species could be, for example, vibrationally excited O2 molecules,

O2 metastables, or even ozone. Discussion of possible photo-

chemistry pathways involving vibrationally excited O2 molecules

or ozone can be found in the literature.[32] Unfortunately, the

identity of the involved species and the exact reaction mechanism

cannot be revealed with currently available data.

The results presented here are still preliminary. The MS

measurements and the treatment of bacteria should be performed

under conditions with better control of the water impurity level in

the He gas and with the more precise investigation of the time

variation of the process. These measurements are out of the scope

of this article at the moment. Still, these results provide enough

information to demonstrate that VUV photons, photochemistry

products, and their reactions in the presence of O2 molecules can

play an important role in the inactivation of bacteria by cold

atmospheric pressure plasmas.

3. Conclusion

A modified version of a microscale atmospheric pressure

plasma jet (m-APPJ) source, so-called X-Jet, has been used to

study in detail possible roles of VUV photons in the

www.plasma-polymers.org 7

final page numbers, use DOI for citation !! R

8

REa

S. Schneider et al.

inactivation of E. coli bacteria. The X-Jet plasma source

allows effective separation of heavy reactive particles (such

as O atoms or ozone molecules) and the plasma-generated

photons. Additionally, it allows checking the possible

photochemistry reaction pathways and their effects on

bacteria. The results clearly show that plasma-generated

VUV photons play an important role in the inactivation of

bacteria. However, we could show that the main effect of

the VUV radiation on bacteria is not the direct radiation

damage but more the indirect production of additional

reactive species in the gas phase. The rate of inactivation is

doubled when plasma-generated photons interact with the

plasma effluent, most probably by additional production of

O atoms and subsequently also O3 molecules. However, the

ground state O2 molecules are not directly involved in these

photochemistry reactions.

The interaction of the plasma-generated VUV photons

with the He/O2 gas (He and O2 in their ground states) also

leads to localized inactivation on the time scale of minutes.

The molecular beam MS measurements of ions in the gas

phase indicate that photoionization of water clusters by

plasma generated VUV photons and the subsequent

interaction of these ions with bacteria could be involved.

The results also indicate that the simultaneous presence of

ions and ground state O2 molecules at the treated surface

leads to the acceleration of the inactivation process.

Acknowledgements: The authors thank Volker Schulz-von derGathen for fruitful discussions about the operation of the m-APPJsource. This work has been performed with the support of theresearch group FOR1123 (Project C1) approved by the GermanResearch Foundation (DFG). This work has also been supported bythe Research Department Plasmas with Complex Interactions ofthe Ruhr-Universitat Bochum as well as through a stipend toJ.-W. L. from the Ruhr University Research School.

Received: May 23, 2011; Revised: September 15, 2011; Accepted:October 11, 2011; DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100102

Keywords: atmospheric pressure plasma jet; bacterial inactivation;mass spectrometry; photochemistry; plasma sterilization

[1] M. G. Kong, G. Kroesen, G. Morfill, T. Nosenko, T. Shimizu,J. van Dijk, J. L. Zimmermann, New J. Phys. 2009, 11, 115012.

[2] E. Stoffels, Y. Sakiyama, D. B. Graves, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.2008, 36, 1441.

[3] G. Daeschlein, T. von Woedtke, E. Kindel, R. Brandenburg, K.-D.Weltmann, M. Junger, Plasma Process. Polym. 2010, 20107,224.

[4] G. Daeschlein, S. Scholz, T. von Woedtke, M. Niggemeier, E.Kindel, R. Foest, R. Brandenburg, K.-D. Weltmann, M. Junger,IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2011, 39, 81.

Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 000–000

� 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

rly View Publication; these are NOT the fina

[5] X. T. Deng, J. J. Shi, M. G. Kong, J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101,074701.

[6] G. Fridman, A. Shereshevsky, M. Jost, A. Brooks, A. Fridman, A.Gutsol, V. Vasilets, G. Friedman, Plasma Chem. Plasma Pro-cess. 2007, 27, 163.

[7] M. Vandamme, E. Robert, S. Pesnel, E. Barbosa, S. Dozias,J. Sobilo, S. Lerondel, A. Le Pape, J. M. Pouvesle, Plasma Process.Polym. 2010, 7, 264.

[8] J. Goree, B. Liu, D. Drake, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2006, 39,3479.

[9] M. Hahnel, T. von Woedtke, K.-D. Weltmann, Plasma Process.Polym. 2010, 7, 244.

[10] D. Dobrynin, G. Fridman, G. Friedman, A. Fridman, New J.Phys. 2009, 11, 115020.

[11] V. Schulz-von der Gathen, V. Buck, T. Gans, N. Knake, K. Niemi,S. Reuter, L. Schaper, J. Winter, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 2007, 47,510.

[12] S. Reuter, K. Niemi, V. Schulz-von der Gathen, H. F. Dobele,Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2009, 18, 015006.

[13] S. Reuter, Formation Mechanisms of Atomic Oxygen in anAtmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet Characterised by Spectro-scopic Methods, Cuvillier Verlag Gottingen, Germany 2008.

[14] J. Jeong, S. Babayan, A. Schutze, V. Tu, M. Morajev, G. Selwyn,R. Hicks, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1998, 7, 282.

[15] J. Laimer, H. Stori, Plasma Process. Polym. 2006, 3, 573.[16] J. Waskoenig, K. Niemi, N. Knake, L. M. Graham, S. Reuter, V.

Schulz-von der Gathen, T. Gans, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol.2010, 19, 045018.

[17] D.-X. Liu, M.-Z. Rong, X.-H. Wang, F. Iza, M. G. Kong, P.Bruggeman, Plasma Process. Polym. 2010, 7, 846.

[18] N. Knake, S. Reuter, K. Niemi, V. Schulz-von der Gathen, J.Winter, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 194006.

[19] D. Ellerweg, J. Benedikt, A. von Keudell, N. Knake, V.Schulz-von der Gathen, New J. Phys. 2010, 12, 013021.

[20] S. Schneider, J.-W. Lackmann, F. Narberhaus, J. E. Bandow,B. Denis, J. Benedikt, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 295201.

[21] N. K. Bibinov, D. O. Bolshukhin, D. B. Kokh, A. M. Pravilov, I. P.Vinogradov, K. Wiesemann, Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8,773.

[22] J. Benedikt, D. Ellerweg, A. von Keudell, Proceedings of SVC2011 TechCon conference, http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2687.

[23] J. Sambrook, E. Fritsch, T. Maniatis, Molecular Cloning: ALaboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,New York 1989.

[24] W. T. Broadwater, R. C. Hoehn, P. H. King, Appl. Microbiol.1973, 26, 391.

[25] W. J. Elford, J. van den Ende, J. Hyg. 1942, 42, 240.[26] W. J. Kowalski, W. P. Bahnfleth, T. S. Whittam, Ozone-Sci. Eng.

1998, 20, 205.[27] J.-W. Lackmann, S. Schneider, F. Narberhaus, J. Benedikt, J. E.

Bandow, Plasma for Bio-Decontamination, Medicine and FoodSecurity, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series – A,scheduled for Jan. 2012.

[28] D. S. Stafford, M. J. Kushner, J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 2451.[29] Y. Itikawa, A. Ichimura, K. Onda, K. Sakimoto, K. Takayanagi,

Y. Hatano, M. Hayashi, H. Nishimura, S. Tsurubuchi, J. Phys.Chem. Ref. Data 1989, 18, 23.

[30] H. Bahre, H. Lange, V. Schulz-von der Gathen, R. Foest, ActaTechnica 2011, 56, T199.

[31] P. Kurunczi, J. Lopez, H. Shah, K. Becker, Int. J. Mass Spectrom.2001, 205, 277.

[32] G. W. Flynn, C. S. Parmenter, A. M. Wodtke, J. Phys. Chem.1996, 100, 12817.

DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201100102

l page numbers, use DOI for citation !!