13
THE SAFEWARDS RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL Reducing Conflict and Containment on psychiatric wards Lead by Professor Len Bowers

THE SAFEWARDS RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL Reducing Conflict and Containment on psychiatric wards Lead by Professor Len Bowers

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

THE SAFEWARDS RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALReducing Conflict and Containment on psychiatric wards

Lead by Professor Len Bowers

Conflict

CONFLICT AND CONTAINMENT

Containment• PRN medication• Coerced IM medication• Special observation• Seclusion• Manual restraint• Time out

• Aggression• Rule breaking• Substance/alcohol use• Absconding/missing• Medication refusal• Self-harm/suicide

THE SAFEWARDS MODEL

Flashpoints Conflict Containment

Staffmodifiers

Originatingdomains

Patientmodifiers

PHYSIC

AL

ENVIR

ON

MEN

TO

UTS

IDE

HO

SPIT

AL

PATIENT COMMUNITY

PATIEN

T CHARACTER

ISTIC

SREG

ULA

TORY FR

AM

EWO

RK

STAFF TEAM

Patient-patient interactionContagion & discord

Internal StructureRules; Routine; Efficiency; Clean/tidy;

Ideology; Custom & practice

Feat

ure

s

Doo

r lo

cked

; Qua

lity;

Com

plex

ity;

secl

usio

n;

PICU; I

CA;

com

fort

/sen

sory

room

s; li

gatu

re p

oint

s

Sym

ptom

s& d

emog

raphy

Paranoia, PD traits; Irritability/disinhib; Abused; m

ale;

Alc/drugs; Depression; insight; delusions; hall.s; young

Str

esso

rs

Visi

tors

; Rel

ativ

es &

fam

ily ten

sion

s; P

rosp

ectiv

e –v

e m

ove

Dep

ende

ncy

& In

stitu

tiona

lisat

ion;

Dem

ands

& h

ome

External stru

cture

Legal framew

ork; National policy; C

omplaints;

Appeals; Prosecutions; Hospital policy

Staff modifiersStaff anxiety & frustration; Moral commitments;

Psychological understanding; Teamwork & consistency; Technical mastery; Positive

appreciation

Staff modifiersExplanation/information; Role modelling;

Patient education; Removal of means;Presence & presence+

Sta

ff m

odifi

ers

Car

ingl

y vi

gila

nt &

inqu

isiti

ve; C

heck

ing

rout

ines

, Déc

or, M

aint

enan

ce; C

lean

&

tidy;

Alte

rnat

ive

choi

ces;

Res

pect

Sta

ff m

odifi

ers

Car

er/r

elat

ive

invo

lvem

ent

Fam

ily the

rapy

Activ

e pa

tient

sup

port

Staff

mod

ifiers

Pharmacotherapy

Psychotherapy & functional analysis;

Nursing support &

intervention

Patient modifiersAnxiety management; Mutual support; Moral commitments;

Psychological understanding; Technical mastery;

FlashpointsDenial of request; Staffdemand; Limit setting

Bad news;ignoring

FlashpointsAssembly/crowding/activity

Queuing/waiting/noiseStaff/pt turnover/change

Bullying/stealing/prop. damage

Flas

hpoi

nts

Secr

ecy;

Sol

itude

;

Adm

issi

on s

hock

;

Exit

bloc

ked

Flashpoin

ts

Exacerbations;

Independence/identity

Acuity/severity

Flashpoin

ts

Com

pulsory detention;

Admission; Appeal refusal;

Com

plaint denied;

Enforced treatment;

Exit refused

Flas

hpoi

nts

Bad

new

s; H

ome

cris

is;

Loss

of r

elat

ions

hip

or

acco

mm

odat

ion;

Argu

men

t

CONFLICT

CONTAINMENT

&

Staff

modifi

ers

Due process; Justice; R

espect for rights; Hope;

Information giving; Support to appeal;

Legitimacy; C

ompensatory autonom

y;

Consistent policy; Flexibility; R

espect

THE SAFEWARDS TRIAL

Aim:– Devise a set of the most feasible interventions

for inpatient nurses with potentially maximal impact on conflict and containment

– Subject those to a rigorous RCT.

DEVELOPMENT OF INTERVENTIONS

Experimental intervention (Organisational)Mutual Help Meeting, Clear Mutual Expectations, Soft Words, Talk Down, Know Each Other, Reassurance, Positive Words, Bad News Mitigation, Discharge Messages, Calm Down Methods. (n = 10) + handbook

Active Control intervention (Wellbeing)desk exercises, pedometer competitions, healthy snacks, diet assessment and feedback, health and exercise magazines, health promotion literature, linkages to local sports and exercise facilities

FINAL INTERVENTION LIST

MAIN OUTCOMES

CONFLICT14.6% decreaseCI 5.4 – 23.5%

p = 0.004

CONTAINMENT23.6% decreaseCI 5.8 – 35.2%

p = 0.001

• Fidelity check indicated a low take up (38%) of interventions in the time frame.

• Multiple checking of statistics including removing outliers and modelling for missing data. Does not change results.

• Disappointing return of staff questionnaires.

• Turn it around and look as if Wellbeing Intervention makes staff fitter. Still checking.

• Bottom line – we recommend all 10 interventions are adopted.

ADDITIONAL INFO

• Trial results first announced NPNR in September 2013

• Since then a programme of dissemination both nationally and internationally

• Initially this was combined with dissemination through social media.

• In December of 2103, www.safewards.net went online

DISSEMINATION

• 9 “International “ presentations ( Europe and Australia)

• 25 presentations to UK conferences, Universities, Trusts or Wards.

• 500+ Facebook Members ( International)

• 100+ Twitter members ( primarily UK)

• Definite contact in 31/59 NHS trusts (England)

• 9 Identified Wards/units in Trusts additional to Trial (9) and Pilot wards (1)

• 2 non UK (Canada and Holland)

• 1 Trust has Safewards as a CQUIN or Quality standard for 2014

SINCE SEPTEMBER..

ITS ALL HERE!!!

WWW.SAFEWARDS.NET

[email protected]

TO HAVE MORE DETAILED PRESENTATION FOR YOUR TRUST