Upload
georgina-park
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering
Trinity College Dublin
The Schoharie Creek Thruway bridge collapse
Group 18Karen McMorrow
David O’BrienClare Whitely
Introduction
•Design Started in 1949
•Completed in October 1954•165m span comprising of 5 simple spans
• 165m long bridge comprising of 5 simple spans
•1955: 100 Year Flood
•Collapsed in 1987
The Collapse•The bridge collapsed during an estimated 50year flood in 1987
•Pier 3 collapsed first
•Followed instantly by spans 3 and 4
•This led to the collapse of pier 2 and span 2
•Finally 2 hrs later, Pier 1 and Span 1 shifted.
PIER 1 PIER 2 PIER 3 PIER 4
Flow
EastAbutment
SlopedEmbankment
RiprapSlopedEmbankment
West Abutment
NORTH
110' 120' 110' 100'SPAN 1100'
SPAN 2 SPAN 5SPAN 4SPAN 3
Figure 2 - Schematic plan of bridge ( after "Collapse," 1987 )
PIER 1 PIER 2 PIER 3 PIER 4
Flow
EastAbutment
SlopedEmbankment
RiprapSlopedEmbankment
West Abutment
NORTH
110' 120' 110' 100'SPAN 1100'
SPAN 2 SPAN 5SPAN 4SPAN 3
Figure 2 - Schematic plan of bridge ( after "Collapse," 1987 )
Reasons For Failure
Scour: The removal of sediment from a streambed due to water erosive action
Influencing Factors
•Shallow footings
•Sheet-piles removed
•Riprap was not adequate
•Foundations on erodible soil
•Could not resist scour
Lessons Learnt
•Always perform regular maintenance and inspections
•Need for clear design objectives
•Sheet piling should have been left in place
•Importance of footing depth
•Design for rare events
Conclusion•10 lives were lost in this tragedy, this could have been prevented with regular inspections, better
communication and adequate erosion protection