6
We welcome your thoughts, comments and/or suggestions. Do you have an idea for a story? Is there information we can provide you? All correspondence concerning The Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy, Norman Regional Health System CockcroftGault vs MDRD......... 1 Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Update.............. 2 New Clinical Pharmacy Program....................... 2 Fleet® Enemas Missing From Patient Units! ............. 3 The Unwanted Effects Of Drugs ................ 3 Flu Shot Myths Debunked ........ 4 Ordering Whodunit ............. 4 Welcome Our New Pharmacy Residents ............. 5 Drug Shortages ................. 5 Medication Safety............... 6 Is a medication missing from your eMAR or does it need retimed? Please send pharmacy a MAR clarification with your request. This is the preferred method of communication with the Pharmacy. This helps to limit the number of phone calls to the pharmacy, which in turn reduces the number of distractions to the pharmacists. Limiting these distractions improves patient care by reducing medication errors while improving the efficiency of the pharmacy to profile medications. In This Issue: Fall 2012, Issue 2 While the gold standard for evaluating kidney disease is direct measurement of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), this approach is often clinically impractical. Drug manufacturers are advised to follow the 1998 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry to utilize the Cockcroft– Gault equation as a basis for drugdosing recommendations. As a result, manufacturerprovided label information for products approved for marketing by FDA typically make dosing recommendations using this strategy, and clinicians employ this approach for medication adjustments in practice. The modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation was developed as an alternative approach for staging renal disease and previous studies have confirmed the estimated GFR (eGFR) to be an accurate means of detecting chronic kidney disease. Both CockcroftGault and MDRD are commonly used serum creatininebased equations to estimate renal function; however, there are important differences between the two measures. The CockcroftGault equation CrCl (mL/min) = [(140 – age) × (weight in kg)]/ (72 × SCr) × (0.85 if female) Estimates creatinine clearance (CrCl), the renal clearance of endogenous creatinine Uses a patient’s age, sex, serum creatinine (SCr) concentration, and weight. Race is not considered Use of ideal body weight is recommended for estimating renal function except when the patient’s actual body weight is less than ideal The MDRD equation GFR (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) = 186 × (SCr) – 1.154 × (age) – 0.203 × (0.742 if female) × (1.210 if African American) Estimates GFR adjusted for body surface area Uses a patient’s age, sex, race, and SCr concentration. Weight is not considered, so it’s not recommended for use in patients with extremes in muscle mass and diet This equation has not been validated in patients older than 70 years of age, but an MDRD derived eGFR may still be a useful tool Key differences between renal function estimates Most medications are renally dosed based on CrCl from CockcroftGault Given that SCr is dependent on muscle mass, weight is likely to have an effect on CrCl A person with a greater muscle mass will naturally produce a higher level of creatinine, regardless of their renal function When weight is considered, the same SCr level leads to different CrCl (see example below) Estimated Kidney Function in Two White Male Patients Both Aged 62 with SCr Levels of 2 mg/dL, but with Different Body Weights Despite the difference in weight, both patients have the same estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) because the MDRD calculation is adjusted for body surface area. Cockcroft-Gault vs MDRD for Estimation of Renal Function By Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS Patient Weight Age SCr CockcroftGault MDRD 60 kg (132 lb) 62 years 2 mg/dL 33 mL/min 36 mL/min/1.73 m 2 100 kg (220 lb) 62 years 2 mg/dL 54 mL/min 36 mL/min/1.73 m 2

The Script - Issue 2 FINALThe Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Script - Issue 2 FINALThe Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy,

We welcome your thoughts, comments and/or suggestions.

Do you have an idea for a story? Is there information we can provide you?

All correspondence concerning The Script should be sent to:

Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308

Norman, OK 73071

The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy, Norman Regional Health System

Cockcroft-­‐Gault  vs  MDRD.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    1  

Pharmacy  and  Therapeutics  Committee  Update.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    2  

New  Clinical  Pharmacy  Program.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    2  

Fleet®  Enemas  Missing    From  Patient  Units!  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .      3  

The  Unwanted    Effects  Of  Drugs  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .      3  

Flu  Shot  Myths  Debunked  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    4  

Ordering  Whodunit  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .      4  

Welcome  Our  New  Pharmacy  Residents  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    5  

Drug  Shortages  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    5  

Medication  Safety.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .      6  

Is a medication missing from your eMAR or does it need retimed? Please send pharmacy a MAR clarification with your request. This is the preferred method of communication with the Pharmacy. This helps to limit the number of phone calls to the

pharmacy, which in turn reduces the number of distractions to the pharmacists. Limiting these distractions improves patient care by reducing medication errors while improving the efficiency of the pharmacy to profile medications.

The Script

In This Issue:

Fal l 2012, Issu e 2

While   the   gold   standard   for   evaluating   kidney   disease   is   direct   measurement   of   the   glomerular  filtration   rate   (GFR),   this  approach   is  often  clinically   impractical.  Drug  manufacturers  are  advised   to  follow  the  1998  Food  and  Drug  Administration   (FDA)  guidance   for   industry   to  utilize   the  Cockcroft–Gault  equation  as  a  basis  for  drug-­‐dosing  recommendations.  As  a  result,  manufacturer-­‐provided  label  information   for   products   approved   for   marketing   by   FDA   typically   make   dosing   recommendations  using   this   strategy,  and  clinicians  employ   this  approach   for  medication  adjustments   in  practice.  The  modification  of  diet   in  renal  disease  (MDRD)  equation  was  developed  as  an  alternative  approach  for  staging   renal   disease   and   previous   studies   have   confirmed   the   estimated   GFR   (eGFR)   to   be   an  accurate  means  of  detecting  chronic  kidney  disease.  Both  Cockcroft-­‐Gault  and  MDRD  are  commonly  used   serum   creatinine-­‐based   equations   to   estimate   renal   function;   however,   there   are   important  differences  between  the  two  measures.  

The  Cockcroft-­‐Gault  equation  CrCl  (mL/min)  =  [(140  –  age)  ×  (weight  in  kg)]/  (72  ×  SCr)  ×  (0.85  if  female)   Estimates  creatinine  clearance  (CrCl),  the  renal  clearance  of  endogenous  creatinine   Uses  a  patient’s  age,  sex,  serum  creatinine  (SCr)  concentration,  and  weight.    Race  is  not                               considered   Use  of  ideal  body  weight  is  recommended  for  estimating  renal  function  except  when  the       patient’s  actual  body  weight  is  less  than  ideal  

The  MDRD  equation  GFR  (mL/min/1.73  m2)  =  186  ×  (SCr)–  1.154  ×  (age)–  0.203  ×  (0.742  if  female)  ×  (1.210  if  African  American)   Estimates  GFR  adjusted  for  body  surface  area   Uses  a  patient’s  age,  sex,  race,  and  SCr  concentration.  Weight  is  not  considered,  so  it’s  not                     recommended  for  use  in  patients  with  extremes  in  muscle  mass  and  diet   This  equation  has  not  been  validated  in  patients  older  than  70  years  of  age,  but  an  MDRD-­‐       derived  eGFR  may  still  be  a  useful  tool  

Key  differences  between  renal  function  estimates   Most  medications  are  renally  dosed  based  on  CrCl  from  Cockcroft-­‐Gault   Given  that  SCr  is  dependent  on  muscle  mass,  weight  is  likely  to  have  an  effect  on  CrCl   A  person  with  a  greater  muscle  mass  will  naturally  produce  a  higher  level  of  creatinine,         regardless  of  their  renal  function   When  weight  is  considered,  the  same  SCr  level  leads  to  different  CrCl  (see  example  below)  

Estimated  Kidney  Function  in  Two  White  Male  Patients  Both  Aged  62  with  SCr  Levels  of  2  mg/dL,  but  with  Different  Body  Weights  

     

Despite   the   difference   in   weight,   both   patients   have   the   same   estimated   glomerular   filtration   rate  (eGFR)  because  the  MDRD  calculation  is  adjusted  for  body  surface  area.  

Cockcroft-Gault vs MDRD for Estimation of Renal Function By Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS

Patient  Weight   Age   SCr   Cockcroft-­‐Gault   MDRD  60  kg  (132  lb)   62  years   2  mg/dL   33  mL/min   36  mL/min/1.73  m2  

100  kg  (220  lb)   62  years   2  mg/dL   54  mL/min   36  mL/min/1.73  m2  

Page 2: The Script - Issue 2 FINALThe Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy,

Fal l 2012, Issu e 2 The Script

2

Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Update By Brad Foster, Pharm.D.

Drug   Indication   Usual  Dose   Dosage  and  Strength   P&T  Action  

Actemra®    (tocilizumab)  

Rheumatoid  arthritis   4  mg/kg  IV  every  4  weeks;  may  be  increased  to  8  mg/kg  based  on  clinical  response  

20  mg/mL  (4  mL,  10  mL,    20  mL  vials  for  injection)  

Added  to  Formulary  for  Outpatient  Use  

Commit®  (nicotine  lozenge)  

Smoking  cessation  aid   If  smoke  within  30  minutes  of  waking:    4  mg;  otherwise  use  2  mg  according  to  dosing  schedule  

2  mg  and  4  mg  lozenges   Added  to  Formulary  

Exelon  Patch®  (rivastigmine)  

Mild-­‐to-­‐moderate  Alzheimer’s  dementia;  Mild-­‐to-­‐moderate  Parkinson’s-­‐related  dementia  

Initial  4.6  mg/24  hr;  if  well  tolerated  may  be  increased  to  9.5  mg/24  hr  and  then  to  13.3  mg/24  hr  (max  dose)  

4.6  mg/24  hr,  9.5  mg/24  hr,  13.3  mg/24  hr  patch  

Added  to  Formulary  

Invega  sustenna®    (paliperidone  palmitate)  

Schizophrenia;    Schizoaffective  disorder  

Initial  dose  is  234  mg  IM  on  day  1,156  mg  IM  one  week  later,  then  maintenance  dose  of  39-­‐234  mg  monthly  

39  mg,  78  mg,  156  mg,    234  mg  suspension  for  injection  

Not  Added  to  Formulary  

Latuda®  (lurasidone)  

Schizophrenia   Initial  dose  is  40  mg  daily  with  a  maximum  recommended  dose  of    160  mg/day  

20  mg,  40  mg,  80  mg  tablets   Added  to  Formulary  

Lipitor®  (atorvastatin)  

Primary  and  secondary  prevention  of  cardiovascular  disease;  Dyslipidemia  

10  mg  to  80  mg  daily   10  mg,  20  mg,  40  mg,  80  mg  tablets  

Added  to  Formulary  

Natrecor®  (nesiritide)  

Acute  decompensated  heart  failure  

Optional  bolus  of  2  mcg/kg  followed  by  continuous  infusion  at  0.01  mcg/kg/min  

1.5  mg  injection,  powder  for  reconstitution  

Removed  from  Formulary  

Niaspan®  (niacin  extended-­‐release)  

Dyslipidemia   Initially  500  mg  at  bedtime  for  4  weeks,  then  1  g  at  bedtime  for  4  weeks;  adjust  to  response  and  tolerance  to  max  of  2  g/day  

500  mg,  750  mg,  1000  mg  extended  release  tablets  

Added  to  Formulary  

Orencia®  (abatacept)  

Rheumatoid  arthritis    <60  kg:  500  mg  IV;  60-­‐100  kg:  750  mg  IV;  >100  kg:  1000  mg  IV;  dose  is  repeated  at  2  weeks  and  4  weeks;  then  every  4  weeks  

250  mg  injection,  powder  for  reconstitution  

Added  to  Formulary  for  Outpatient  Use  

Saphris®  (asenapine)  

Schizophrenia;    Bipolar  disorder  

Initial  dose  is  5  mg  twice  daily,  may  increase  to  10  mg  twice  daily  

5  mg  and  10  mg  sublingual  tablets  

Not  Added  to  Formulary  

Stalevo®  (carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone)  

Parkinson’s  disease   Dosed  based  on  response  with  maximum  daily  dose  of  8  tablets  of  Stalevo®  50,  75,  100,  125,  or  150  and  6  tablets  of  Stalevo®  200  

50/12.5/200,  75/18.75/200,  100/24/200,  125/31.25/200,  150/37.5/200,  200/50/200  mg  carbidopa/levodopa/  entacapone  tablets  

Added  to  Formulary  

New Clinical Pharmacy Program - Renal Dose Adjustment of Medications By Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS

 

The  Pharmacy  and  Therapeutics  Committee   recently  approved  a  Renal  Dosing  Policy  allowing  pharmacy  to  automatically  adjust  certain  medications  based   on   a   patient’s   current   renal   function.     The   table   below   lists   those  medications   currently   approved   for   automatic   adjustment   by   pharmacy.    Additional   medications   will   be   submitted   for   approval   at   future   P&T   Committee   Meetings.       Pharmacy   will   contact   the   physician   regarding   any  medications  that  are  either  contraindicated  or  not  recommended  based  on  a  patient’s  CrCl;  they  will  not  automatically  discontinue  these  medications.  Pharmacists   will   be   adjusting   these  medications   based   on   the   patient’s   CrCl,   estimated   using   the   Cockcroft-­‐Gault   equation.     In   addition   to   dose-­‐adjusting  medications  for  patients  with  reduced  renal  function,  pharmacy  will  re-­‐adjust  the  dose  when/if  the  patient’s  renal  function  improves.    Since  this  program  started  in  late  April  2012  through  the  end  of  December  2012,  the  pharmacy  has  made  a  total  of  1,716  interventions.    Please  feel  free  to  contact  the  pharmacy  department  if  you  have  any  questions  or  concerns  regarding  any  medication  change.      

Acyclovir  (Zovirax®)  

Ampicillin    

Cephalexin  (Keflex®)  

DAPTOmycin  (Cubicin®)  

Ertapenem  (INVanz®)  

Levofloxacin  (Levaquin®)  

Nitrofurantion  (Macrobid®,  Macrodantin®)  

Sulfamethoxazole/  Trimethoprim  (Bactrim®)  

Allopurinol  (Zyloprim®)  

Ampicillin/  Sulbactam  (Unasyn®)  

Cetirizine  (Zyrtec®)  

Desvenlafaxine  (Pristiq)  

Famotidine  (Pepcid®)  

Loratadine  (Claritin®)  ±  pseudoephedrine  

Oseltamivir  (Tamiflu®)  

 

Amoxicillin  (Amoxil®)  

Aztreonam  (Azactam®)  

Ciprofloxacin  (Cipro®)  

DULoxetine  (Cymbalta®)  

Fluconazole  (Diflucan®)  

Metformin  (Glucophage®)  ±  rosiglitazone    ±  glyburide  

Piperacillin/  Tazobactam  (Zosyn®)  

 

Amoxicillin/  Clavulanate  (Augmentin®)  

CefTAZidime  (Fortaz®)  

Dabigatran  (Pradaxa®)  

Enoxaparin  (Lovenox®)  

Imipenem/Cilastatin  (Primaxin®)  

MetroNIDAZOLE  (Flagyl®)  

SitaGLIPtin  (Januvia®)  

 

 

Page 3: The Script - Issue 2 FINALThe Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy,

Fal l 2012, Issu e 2 The Script

3

The Unwanted Effects of Drugs By Sarah Payne, Pharm.D.

Fleet®  Enemas  have  been  moved  to  the  pharmacy,  so  that  patients’  renal  function  can  be  assessed  prior  to  order  entry.    Nursing  will  need  to  assess   the   patient’s   renal   function   prior   to   administration,   in   case   of   decrease   in   renal   function   between   the   time   of   order   and  

administration,  particularly  in  the  case  of  PRN  orders.  

Physicians   will   be   contacted   asking   for   verification   of   Fleet®   Enema   use   or   selection   of   alternative   agents   when   the  following  conditions  are  met:  

1) Patient’s  CrCl  ≤  30  mL/min  2) Patient’s  serum  creatinine  ≥  1.5  mg/dL  3) Patient’s  serum  creatinine  has  tripled  within  the  previous  72  hours  

Manufacturer’s   labeling   for   Fleet®   Enema   contraindicates   its   use   in   patients   with:     congestive   heart   failure,   clinically  significant  impairment  of  renal  function,  known  or  suspected  GI  obstruction,  paralytic  ileus  and  dehydration.  It  also  states  to  use  caution  in  patients:    with  impaired  renal  function,  taking  medications  known  to  prolong  the  QT  interval,  who  are  65  years  of  age  or  older,  and  those  taking  medications  known  to  affect  renal  perfusion  or  function  or  hydration  status.  The  package  insert  also  states  that  administration  of  more  than  one  enema  in  24  hours  can  be  harmful.    

An  error  was  reported  in  the  August  9,  2012  ISMP  Safety  Alert  Bulletin  regarding  an  elderly  patient  with  acute  renal  failure  who   suffered   hyperphosphatemia   after   administration   of   two   Fleet®   enemas   during   her   hospitalization.     The   patient  required   daily   hemodialysis   after   developing   severe   hyperphosphatemia     (PO4   =   19.9   mg/dL)   and   then   secondary  hypocalcemia  (Ca  =  5.4  mg/dL).      

Each   Fleet®   enema   contains   7   gm   of   dibasic   sodium   phosphate   and   19   gm   of   monobasic   sodium   phosphate   (more   than   160  mmol   of  phosphate  per  dose).    The  over-­‐the-­‐counter  status  of   Fleet®  enemas  may  contribute   to  underestimation  of   the  risk  associated  with  their  use.  

Fleet® Enemas Missing from Patient Units! By Betsy Nelson, Pharm.D., BCPS

 

With  so  many  patients  coming  to  the  hospital  with  a  long  list  of  medications  and  medication  allergies,  it  is  becoming  increasingly  important  to  understand  the  difference  between  an  adverse  drug  reaction  and  an  allergy.    A  drug  allergy  occurs  when  the  immune  system  reacts  to  a  medication   triggering   an   allergic   reaction.     Drug   allergy   symptoms   can   range   from   mild   to   severe.     Some   of   the   most   common   mild  symptoms  include  hives,  rash,  or  fever.    Moderate  to  severe  symptoms  range  from  facial  swelling  and  difficulty  breathing  to  anaphylaxis  and  death.    Treatment  of  a  drug  allergy  may  include:  antihistamines  (e.g.  Benadryl®  to  relieve  mild  symptoms  such  as  rash,  hives,  and  itching),  bronchodilators  (e.g.  albuterol  to  reduce  moderate  wheezing  or  cough),  corticosteroids  (topical,  oral,  or  intravenous),  and  epinephrine  (by  injection  to  treat  anaphylaxis).    

A   drug   side   effect   is   a   sensitivity   to   a  medication   that   results   in   an   unwanted   consequence.     A   drug   side   effect   does   not   involve   the  immune  system,  like  an  allergy,  and  does  not  prevent  the  patient  from  taking  the  medication.    Most  adverse  reactions  are  mild,   including  stomach  upset,  headache,  nausea,  soreness,  dizziness,  and  cough,  but  some  are  more  serious,  such  as  bleeding  or  low  blood  pressure,  and  require  medical   attention.     Treatment  of   a   side   effect   includes   adjusting   the   dosage   of  medication,   use   of   a   second  medication   to   treat  adverse   symptoms   caused   by   the   first   medication,   and   discontinuing   the  medication.     All   opioids  medications   can   cause   the   release   of  histamine   from  mast   cells   into   the   skin,  which   in   turn   can   cause   hives,   sneezing,   itching,   and   asthma.     These   are   all   often  mistaken   for  allergies,  but   in  fact  are  a  known  side  effect  of  opioids.    Another  example  is  stomach  upset  that  commonly  occurs  with  aspirin,  which  is  a  known  side  effect  of  the  medication  and  is  often  mistaken  as  an  allergy.    Please  see  “To  Code  or  Not  to  Code?  Allergies  and  ADRs  That  Is”  on  page  6  for  information  on  how  to  enter  a  medication  as  an  adverse  reaction  versus  an  allergy  in  MEDITECH.  

When  medications  are  listed  as  an  allergy,  but  in  truth  are  side  effects,  there  are  several  consequences  that  can  occur.    First,  this  may  cause  a  treatment  delay.    If  the  medication  that  the  patient  states  an  allergy  to  is  prescribed  then  the  pharmacist  profiling  the  order  has  to  call  the  nurse  or  doctor  to  get  a  medication  clarification.  This  can  take  some  time  and  can  delay  the  patient  getting  the  correct  treatment.    Second,  the  patient  can  receive  a  suboptimal  treatment.    In  the  case  of  a  listed  aspirin  allergy  when  the  patient  has  a  heart  attack,  he/she  will  not  be  given  aspirin  and  as  a  result,  the  patient  may  experience  a  drastically  different  outcome.      

The  best  way  to  investigate  a  patient's  reaction  to  the  drug  is  to  discuss  what  type  of  reaction  the  patient  has  experienced,  his/her  history  with  the  medication,  and  past  tolerance  or  intolerance  of  similar  medications  to  get  a  full  picture  of  the  reaction.    This  information  can  help  the  health  care  provider  determine  if  the  reaction  is  an  adverse  reaction  or  an  allergy;  therefore,  a  medication  appropriate  for  treatment  can  be  given  without  causing  unpleasant  or  unsafe  reactions.    If  a  question  arises  as  to  whether  a  reaction  is  an  adverse  reaction  or  allergy,  then  please  call  a  pharmacist.    We  would  love  to  help  you!  

Page 4: The Script - Issue 2 FINALThe Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy,

Fal l 2012, Issu e 2 The Script

4

Congratulations to the following pharmacists who are now Board Certified Pharmacotherapy Specialists! The pharmacy now has a total of 11 pharmacists with BCPS certification.

Fran  Esfahani       Jenny  Stemm         Stefanie  Stogsdill                 Karen  Thompson  

 

We  hear  various  statements  every  year  about  why  people  just  don’t  want  to  get  the  flu  shot.    The  following  are  the  most  common  flu  shot  myths  that  just  aren’t  true.  

1) “The  flu  shot  causes  the  flu.”  The  viruses  in  the  flu  shot  are  dead,  so  they  can’t  cause  the  flu.  The  most  common  side  effect  of  the  flu  shot  is  a  sore  arm.    Even  the  “active”  FluMist®   nasal   spray   cannot   cause   the   flu   because   the   viruses   are   weakened.     The  side  effects  that  occur  are  runny  nose,  wheezing,  and  headache.    So  why  do  people  say  they  get  the  flu  after  they  get  the  flu  shot?  This   is   likely  due  to  the  fact  that  flu  shots   are   given   at   the   same   time   of   year   when   most   respiratory   illnesses   occur.      Another   important  point   is   that   the   flu   shot   does   not   take  effect   for   about  a  week  after  it  is  administered,  so  you  can  still  get  the  flu  during  that  time.  

2) “The  flu  is  just  a  bad  cold.”    The  flu  tends  to  come  on  quicker  and  last  longer  than  a  typical   cold.     The   most   common   side   effects   are   fever,   sore   throat,   body   aches,  fatigue,   headaches,   and   a   runny   or   congested   nose.     The   flu   can   also   cause   life-­‐threatening  complications  like  pneumonia  and  other  secondary  bacterial  infections.  

3) “I  never  get  the  flu.  I  don’t  need  a  flu  shot.”  When  healthy  people  get  the  flu  shot,  it  can  actually  help  protect  the  weak  from  the  flu  by  preventing  its  spread  among  healthcare  providers.    So  it  benefits  not  just  you,  but  your  patients  as  well!    

Flu Shot Myths Debunked By Sarah Payne, Pharm.D.

Ordering Whodunit By Sarah Payne, Pharm.D.

4

From  the  status  board                

                                                 When  new  orders  are  acknowledged                                                                                                                                        When  an  order  is  viewed                

 

Recently,   there   has   been   a   lot   of   confusion   as   to   the   source   of  medication   orders.     Practitioners   are  moving   towards   Computerized  Physician   Order   Entry   (CPOE),   which   eliminates   the   need   for   paper  orders.    During  this  transition  period,  physicians  and  pharmacists  can  either   enter   orders   electronically   via   Provider   Order   Management  (POM)  or  write  orders  in  the  paper  chart.      

Here’s  how  to  tell  from  where  the  order  originated:      1) S  =  Signed  order  2) U  =  Unsigned  order  3) N  =  No  order  necessary                    4) PROVIDER  =  POM/CPOE  order    5) zCPOE   EDIT   =   The   PROVIDER   entered   order   was   edited   by   a  

pharmacist,  creating  a  new  order,  but  there  is  no  written  order  to  go  with  it  

Page 5: The Script - Issue 2 FINALThe Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy,

Fal l 2012, Issu e 2 The Script

5

Top 5 Pharmacy Order Entry Dates

December  18,  2012    -­‐      6462  orders                                January  8,  2013    -­‐    6428  orders       August  28,  2012    -­‐    6379  orders                                              November  26,  2012    -­‐    6377  orders                                                      June  5,  2012    -­‐    6300  orders      

Welcome Our New Pharmacy Residents

                                                                                                                 Critical  Medication  Shortages      

Medication   Action  Plan  

Acyclovir  IV  Conserving  use  when  possible.    For   adults  being   ruled  out   for  viral  meningitis   –   stopping   acyclovir  when  the  CSF  HSV  PCR   is  reported  as  negative  

Aminophylline  IV   Conserving  use  when  possible  

Chloral  hydrate  PO   Manufacturer   discontinued   production.     Using  midazolam   PO  instead.  

Droperidol  IV   Conserving  use  when  possible  Exactacain®  spray   Changing  to  Hurricaine®  spray  Propofol  IV   Conserving  use  when  possible  Sodium  bicarbonate  syringes   Using  vials  in  code  carts  in  place  of  prefilled  syringes  TPN  components  (amio  acids,  various  electrolytes  and  multivitamins)  

Conserving  use  when  possible  

 

Drug Shortages By Sonal Yang, Pharm.D., BCPS

Butorphanol  IV   Methotrexate  IV  

Fosphenytoin  IV   Metoclopramide  IV  

Furosemide  IV   Nalbuphine  IV  

Ketorolac  IV   Naloxone  IV  

Leucovorin  IV   Ondansetron  IV  

 

Medications  with  Resumed  Availability  

NRHS  offers  a  yearlong  accredited  Pharmacy  Residency  program  in  general  pharmacy  practice  that  begins  each  year  in  July  and  ends  in  June  of  the  following  year.     It  allows  pharmacists  to  accelerate  their  growth  beyond  entry-­‐level   competencies,  to  refine  their  clinical  skills   in  a  broad  range  of  disease  states  and  to  provide  evidence-­‐based,  patient  centered  medication  therapy.    Residents  are  also  cross-­‐trained  in  distribution,  in  the  IV  room  and  can  be  found  staffing  at  the  Healthplex  on  Monday  through  Thursday  evenings.      

This  year,  NRHS  has  three  pharmacy  practice  residents:    Shamama  Burney,   Sarah  Payne,  and  Tiffany  White.    All  are  2012  graduates  from  the  University  of  Oklahoma  College  of  Pharmacy,  and  all  three  intend  to  pursue  a  second  year  pharmacy  specialty  residency.    

Shamama  Burney  was  born   in  Pakistan  and  moved   to  California  when   she  was  five  years  old.    She  moved  to  Oklahoma  four  years  ago  for  pharmacy  school  and  considers   herself   a   one-­‐of-­‐a-­‐kind   PakiCaliOkie!     Shamama’s   areas   of   interest  include  internal  medicine  and  anticoagulation.    She  aspires  to  establish  a  career  incorporating   leadership   and   academia,   as   well   as   contributing   to   pharmacy  literature  in  the  near  future.    

Sarah   Payne  was   born   in   raised   in  Moore,  Oklahoma.     Her   pharmacy   interests  include  ambulatory  care,  diabetes,  infectious  disease,  and  cardiology.    She  plans  to  pursue  a  specialized  second  year  residency  in  ambulatory  care.    

Tiffany   White   is   originally   from   Arkansas   and   moved   to   Oklahoma   to   teach  science   in   2005.     She   decided   to   go   back   to   pharmacy   school   in   2008.     Her  pharmacy   interests   include   infectious   disease   and   cardiology,   and   she   plans   to  pursue  a  specialized  second  postgraduate  residency  in  cardiology.  

Each  resident  undertakes  a  project  during  their  residency,  which  they  present  at  local   and   national   pharmacy   meetings.     Shamama’s   project   focuses   on   the  overuse   of   acid   suppression   therapy   and   its   contribution   to  Clostridium   difficile-­‐Associated  Disease   (CDAD)  and   pneumonia.     Sarah’s   project  involves  changing  the  way  bulk  medications,  like  inhalers,  are  processed  so  they  can  be  sent  home  with  the  patient.    This  would  reduce  the  cost  of  requisition  and  disposal  of  bulk  medications  on  the  health  care  system.  Tiffany’s  project  involves  the  conversion  of  anticoagulation  protocols  from  activated  partial  thromboplastin  time  (aPTT)  to  antifactor  Xa  levels  for  monitoring  of  unfractionated  heparin  (UFH)  infusions.  

Left to right: Tiffany White, Sarah Payne, and Shamama Burney

Page 6: The Script - Issue 2 FINALThe Script should be sent to: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS 901 N Porter Ave., Box 1308 Norman, OK 73071 The Script A Publication of the Department of Pharmacy,

6

To Code or Not to Code? Allergies and ADRs That Is. By Sarah Payne, Pharm.D.

Did   you   know   that   when   an   allergy   or   adverse   reaction   is   “uncoded”,   the   interaction   checker   in  MEDITECH   is   unable   to   check   for   potential   interactions?     For   this   reason,   it   is   important   to   ensure   all  allergies  and  adverse  reactions  are  entered  so  that  they  are  “coded”  in  MEDITECH.    It  is  easy!  Just  follow  these  steps:  

1) When  entering  a  new  allergy  or  adverse  reaction,  start  typing  the  first  couple  letters  of  the  drug  or    allergen  

2) Then  hit  the  F9  button  or  the  drop  down  arrow  and  select  the  appropriate  coded  allergy  3) Fill  out  the  severity,  whether  it  is  an  allergy  or  adverse  reaction,  and  the  type  of  reaction  4) Then  save  

That’s  it!  If  you  do  not  save  the   drug   or   other   allergen  as  a  coded  allergy/adverse  reaction,   it   will   display  “uncoded”  in  red.  

If   you   see   this,   then   use  fewer   letters   to   search   for   the   allergy.     In   this   example,   aspirin  was   typed   using   its   abbreviation.     To  correct  this,  just  type  AS  or  ASP  then  search  through  the  coded  allergies  (F9  or  arrow  box  on  the  right).    If  you   are   having   problems   inputting   an   allergy,   please   contact   another   healthcare   professional   or  pharmacist  for  assistance.        

 

Editor in Chief: Lisa Mayer, Pharm.D., BCPS Clinical Pharmacy Specialist

Contributors: Darin Smith, Pharm.D., BCPS, FASHP Director,  Pharmacy  Services  and  Performance  Improvement  

Brad Foster, Pharm.D. Manager,  Clinical  Pharmacy  Services  

Betsy Nelson, Pharm.D., BCPS Clinical Pharmacy Specialist

Stefanie Stogsdill, Pharm.D., BCPS Staff  Pharmacist  

Sonal Yang, Pharm.D., BCPS Staff  Pharmacist  

Shamama Burney, Pharm.D. Pharmacy  Resident  

Sarah Payne, Pharm.D. Pharmacy  Resident  

Tiffany White, Pharm.D. Pharmacy  Resident  

Medication Safety Accurate Patient Weights: The Weight of the Matter

By Shamama Burney, Pharm.D.

The Script The Quarterly Newsletter of the

Department of Pharmacy

 

Each  day  during  their  hospital  admission,  a  patient’s  weight  is  measured  and  documented  in  their  medical  record.    Although  a  small  task,  the  weight  of  a  patient  is  not  without  significance  because   it  is  an   important  tool  in  medical  decision-­‐making.    When  deciding  a  patient’s  fluid  status,  weight  provides  a  quantifiable  value  to  compare  from  one  day  to  the  next  to  help   identify  if  a  patient  may  be  edematous  or  dehydrated.    When  determining  nutritional  status,  Dietitians  and  Pharmacists  use  weight  in  calculating  a  patients  nutrition  needs  to  ensure  a  patient  is  receiving  the  appropriate  number  of  calories.    Weight  is  even  used  in  selecting  what  equipment  would  be  most  suitable  for  a  patient,  including  whether  or  not  they  would  require  specialty  beds  or  lifts.  

Perhaps  one  of  the  most  important  considerations  for  weight  relates  to  certain  medication  therapies  the  patient  will  receive.    An  accurate  weight   is  vital   in  determining  a  dose  for  a  patient.    Chemotherapeutic  agents   like  cytarabine  and  paclitaxel  are  dosed  according  to  body  surface  area,  which  is  calculated  based  on  body  weight.    Not  only  are  these  agents  incredibly  expensive,  placing  an  unnecessary  economic  burden  on  the  patient  and  the  hospital  if  a  falsely  elevated  weight  were  to  be  reported  for  a  patient,  but  they  are  also  quite  toxic,  which  could  lead  to  increased  adverse  effects.    For  medications  like  anticoagulants  (e.g.  enoxaparin  (1  mg/kg)  or  heparin  drips),  the  wrong  weight  could  result  in  either  under-­‐dosing  patients  with  a  new  DVT  or  PE  so  that  they  are  at  greater  risk  for  clot  extension,  or  overdosing  patients  which   could   contribute   to   increased   bleeding   risk.     With   medications   that   have   a   narrow   therapeutic   margin   like   vancomycin   and  gentamicin,  weight  could  mean   the  difference  between  effective  therapy,  subtherapeutic  dosing  or   the  potential   for  toxicity.    Weight   is  especially  important  regarding  pediatric  patients,  since  every  medication  they  receive  is  dosed  according  to  their  weight,  so  inaccuracy   is  an  error  we  cannot  afford.  

After  weighing  all  of  these  considerations,  it  is  evident  that  accuracy  in  weight  is  important.    So  the  next  time  you  need  to  weigh  a  patient,  remember  some  of  these  helpful  tips  to  obtain  weight  precisely  the  first  time,  every  time:  

Be  consistent:    Weigh  the  patient  the  same  time  every  day,  as  weight  can  fluctuate  throughout  the  day.   Tare   it   up:     Zero   the   bed   so   that   the   bed   scale   reflects   the   patient’s   true   weight.     Remember   to   remove   items   such   as   SCDs   and  

blankets,  which  will  falsely  elevate  the  readings.   Be  mindful  of  units:    When  recording   the  weight   in  MEDITECH,  pay  careful   attention   to  the  units  you  are  entering  (i.e.  kilograms  vs  

pounds).   Compare  to  patient’s  prior  weight:    This  should  be  your  final  double-­‐check  every  time  you  enter  a  weight     And  when   in  doubt,   re-­‐weigh:     It   is   unlikely   that  a  patient  would   gain  16  pounds  overnight   so   take   into   consideration   the   patient’s  

previously  measured  weight.