The so-called 'authentic and apocryphal Gospels, …bare-jesus.net/e005.pdf · The so-called "authentic“ and “apocryphal“ Gospels, Qumran, Nag Hammadi, Koran and Mithraism This

The so-called "authentic“ and “apocryphal“ Gospels, Qumran, Nag Hammadi, Koran and Mithraism

The so-called "authentic” and “apocryphal“ Gospels, Qumran, Nag Hammadi, Koran and Mithraism

This file is also avail-able as PDF, ZIP or WORD.EXE

1st paragraph: Why there are so many non-authentic gospels in Christian sect?

2nd paragraph: Qumran, Nag Hammadi, Ko-ran, Mithraism

3rd paragraph: The Apocryphon of James (next page)

4th paragraph: Pertaining the chro-no-log-i-cal table of the disclosed gospels (next page)

2ndly: paragraph: Qumran, Nag Hammadi, Koran, Mithras

“To them, there-fore, as I said above, one must never give way; nor, when they put forward their fal-si-fi-ca-tions, should one concede that the secret Gospel is by Mark, but should even deny it on oath.”[i]

So, Clement of Alexandria (150 -215) in a letter to a fellow Early Chris-tian that was re-

cov-ered in the year 1958 in the monastery „Mar Saba“ nearby Jerusalem.

Preliminaries , Part: 5, Section:

2

Method and Extend of the Investigation As well Definitions of Concepts

Seite 1


Does it astonish that there are so many „non-au-then-tic“ in Christianity, if the truth

willfully and de-mon-stra-bly is suppres-sed even by crimes of perjury? Conspicuously Chris-

ti-an Clement instigates to perjury because the “Secret Gospel of Mark” contains too much

truth Christian perfidious “faith” can bear.

It is a variant of (Christian) perfidy to deny the authenticity of scripture that is true by

perjury, on the one hand while faking even to die for the truths, on the other.

Is there any possibility of truths at all where measures are taken to suppress the truths, if

necessary even by perjury and finally even by murder?

Already in very the beginning of the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners') sect there were always several "truths" that evenly were disseminated even by Jesus.

Besides the four chronicles (Christians' cant: "chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels")") that

were indexed to the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') Bible, there

were another 68 ones, yet.

They are called “apocryphal", i.e., not genuine chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") by

the Christian swineherds. Exactly this designation stands for disingenuousness and deceit of

this slaveholders’ sect. However, some chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") could be found

again in the last three score of years. The Vatican or other Christian sects were not able to

withhold them to the experts.

Even the brain of less intelligent individuals -- provided they are not that sufficiently

depraved in order to thirst for lies like those ones of Christian type -- must get suspicious if

one experiences to know that from about hundred chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels")

almost all but four were cleared out exactly by those proclaiming them.

Whoever is interested in deceit destroys as much as possible because it could reveal

oneself. Whoever is interested in truths preserves as much as possible in order to search for it.

Seite 2


Already in the introduction we uncovered that Mark had written another gospel

besides that one that is indexed to the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners') Bible or important parts of the original gospel that were about Jesus' homosexual

debauchery with his gay friend Lazarus became eliminated.

Therefore, the secret gospel of Mark respectively those parts that were eliminated

proving Jesus as a catamite were kept tabooed from the very start -- and that even by perjury

as Clement of Alexandria confessed.

Nice martyrs of "truths", aren't they? Therefore, the secret gospel should had

contained much more truths than the " official " one that was added to the Christian

desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') New Testament since otherwise it would

not had been kept secret from the very outset, in fact that much that the undisclosed gospel of

Mark finally got lost.

Concerning deceit there are always many, many secrets (mysteries). A deceiver always

has secrets over secrets; otherwise, the beguiler is not able to lull his victims into a sense of

false security -- a prerequisite of any deceit.

In the last decades on the one hand, Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant:

"innocent" sinners) tried to draw attention to a find that Egyptian peasants made in a cave

near Qumran (close to Dead Sea) about three score years ago. On the other hand, the nerves of

Christian followers are calmed down that Qumran is no threat for the Christian desperadoes

(Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) being convicted to be liars and deceivers, once more.

The latter seems to be right. Qumran is a lot of fuss about nothing. It is completely

irrelevant if deceiving Jesus was an Essenian or not. Those questions are nothing but a

tempest in a teapot or a stir in the madhouse. By the way, Jesus was neither an Essenian nor a

Messiah in Judaism but an adherent of the cult of Mithras, who wanted to play god

Mithras, so gladly.

Seite 3


Being Messiah of Judaism and being god are alternatives not only because unlike the

Mithraic Messiah the Messiah of the Jews is no god but human being. Christ is the Greek term

for Messiah. Thus, whoever drivels about Jesus "Christ" and god's son and lays claim to the

Jewish Bible can, for instance, similarly twaddle: Our domestic swine "dirty piggy" - a

paragon of human being...

Qumran is peripheral of significance, for example, that these scrolls help to limit the

question dating the chronicles' (Christians' cant: "gospels'") production, especially since one

scroll a quotation of the gospel of Mark -- even if insignificant one -- was found. We will

discuss it in the next part of these preliminaries.

Inasmuch some "Christian" concepts, as for example, that one „God's son “ are to be

found in the Qumran scrolls, it is the question, whether such concepts are "out the blue" but

from Mithraism having its origins up to 2000 years B.C.E.

Just a question: Whoever did coin the following extraordinary avowal to cannibalism?

Jesus? Mani? Zarathustra, Mithras?

"He who shall not eat of my body nor drink of my blood so that he may be one

with me and I with him, shall not be saved." [i]

This glowing avowal to cannibalism ("Come and taste what kindly the Lord is...") was

coined by the cult of Mithras. The quotation itself is attributed to Zarathustra, 6th century

BCE. The Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') "Holy Communion"

("Eucharist") cult -- like the story of Jesus' birth - is cribbed from the Mithraism. It produces

evidence how well Christian Pied Piper Jesus knew that cult and how eagerly he emulated

the god Mithras. [ii]

Seite 4


This is the real and concealed context of Christian barbarism: Faking to be Jewish and

indeed being Persian Mithraic. If one asks, what Jesus wanted to be or shammed to be then

there is only one answer: He wanted to fake the god Mithras. In addition, who did coin the

following sayings?:

Joh 6:53 RSV

53 So Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of

the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you;

Joh 6:54 RSV

54 he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise

him up at the last day.

Joh 6:55 RSV

55 For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

Yes, you are right. The cannibal who coined those allegations was Jesus (Satan's) Christ

-- the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) use to mixing up with the

god.

The Christmas story, the “Star of Bethlehem”, even the date of the Christmas festival

(25th of December), the virgin birth, the idea of a redeemer that is god, the concept of pontiff

(Pontifex Maxi-mus), Sunday as a holiday (that is the first day of the week, not the seventh!),

even the fashion of Catholic sect’s priest – that all and much more is cribbed from Mith-ra-ic-

ism. [iii]

By laying claim to Judaism, the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners) veil their doctrines’ sources. Christianity is a poor imitation of Persian Mithraic sect.

Folks will not put the threatening questions about Christian barbarism, so long, they are busy

with the blown up and bleak dispute about the Qumran scrolls -- either because of stupidity,

ignorance or deliberate misleading.

Seite 5


The conditioned ones are lured on the wrong track by allegations the Vatican

oppresses any scrolls of Qumran. Of course, in the past the Vatican had oppressed many

scriptures and stopped at nothing to do it successfully.

However, today Christian totalitarianism has already lost those teeth to do so

regarding scriptures that were founded by others. All what Catholic sect cannot do hundred

percent in secret is very dangerous to it, since there is a possibility to leave barbarism, today.

Of course, one does not know what books and documents the Vatican keeps back in his

own library. Certainly a lot and still much more – however, the Vatican cannot suppress a

writing, that is founded by others and is also known by non-Christian desperadoes

(Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) today, even if the pope would like to do it so gladly.

Apart from this, I dare to question whether there is sufficient brain and freedom of mind

in the Vatican in order to detect the contradictions, if they are not very strikingly, because

intrinsically all contradictions and the veiled truths can be found in the New Testament’s

chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels").

I think almost all Christian leaders are too routine-blinded as to recognize the real

threats to them. Just an impressive example for that: The scripture of "Pistis Sophia" also

recovered in Nag Hammadi -- a sort of gushy gospel -- starts with the information that Jesus

lived and taught still for 14 years (not days, not months!) after his alleged "resurrection"

instead of having gone to hell (So Jesus and the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant:

"innocent" sinners) confuse "heaven", which is expecting them to suffer to Satan's right).

Nevertheless, some Christian conjurers of lying (“theologians”) do not refrain from

publishing this writing entitled: What Jesus taught within 40 days (he allegedly went to

heaven after his "resurrection" according to the "official" Christian sects' lies).

Seite 6


Again, a "wonder" happened in order to help the liars to hide their lies... So, dear

reader, do not take it amiss that I do not think that such very dense folks -- with a tray or cross

put in front of their eyes -- are capable as willing of detecting the threatening contradictions,

at all... Already the question, whether the Messiah is a god, is a Mithraic problem and none of

Judaism.

Therefore, all attention is directed to the find that was made in Qumran in order to

distract it from one that was made in 1945 by two Egyptian peasants -- namely the brothers

Muhammad and Khalifa Ali -- in a cave on a graveyard near the Egyptian town Nag

Hammadi.

So to speak, by chance, many of those almost hundred chronicles (Christians' cant:

"gospels") the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) wanted to get rid of

forever and cleared out to the end of time -- very unfortunately for the Christian liars and

deceivers - were recovered.

Nag Hammadi produces evidence that the most important content of the Christian

"creed", for example, that the boss died on the cross and became crucified for the sins of the

world ("vicarious atonement") is nothing but a sheer bluff. He had a stuntman doing it for

him and instead of him.

About 14 centuries ago, Islamic prophet Muhammad already told this to the

unbelieving Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners). Muhammad’s

father is said having belonged with a Christian group on the Arabian Peninsula that was

stemming from Jesus' family (Jesus' brothers and his successors that were called de-spo-sy-ni)

and thus was shield from despotic domineering and dictating Rome.

In the year 65 CE, Simeon -- a cousin of Jesus -- displaced that Christian sect of the

Nazarenes from Jerusalem to the desert. [iv] So, truths about Jesus that were very well known by his family – much better than in Rome -- and the Roman slaveholder zealously

wanted to get rid of became preserved by the loneliness of the desert. Obviously, that Jesus --

allegedly gone to heaven at 33 or 36 years of age -- "enjoyed" life on earth, i.e., that he secretly

lived on and became secretly old.

Seite 7


Nag Hammadi produces evidence that the Moslems are quite closer to the truths

about Jesus than the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) are. That

means those scriptures of Nag Hammadi produce final evidence that Mohammed was right,

i.e., that already the symbol of the Christian barbarism, namely the cross, does not represent

devotion and suffering of the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners')

prophet (Jesus) but a sheer bluff and nothing but a bluff, spoof, deception and/or very typical

Oriental sorcery.

Indeed, the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') cross -- the

very symbol of this planetary barbarism -- already principally embodies the barbarism's skills

of deceiving, swindling and bluffing that are past comprehension.

By those scriptures, the Christian cross exposes itself as that what it is in fact: A Trojan

Horse that should veil unscrupulous egotists past belief shamming very typical Christianly

devotion, ailments, humility, suffering and/or commitment for others.

However, inside that Trojan Horse there are sly, furtive and depraved warriors that just

have in their mind to make as most as possible slaves subservient to themselves. Spiteful,

nasty, malicious warriors of spite that do not recoil from roping in even the god for their

despicable and execrable warfare on humankind.

Especially concerning Christian sect one cannot but always recalling that each

swindler is faking the reverse of that what he or she made up his or her mind to perpetrate,

yes, in order to get the victims lulled the swindlers often express abhorrence regarding the

objectives they made up their mind to achieve.

In the case of Christianity enslavement is "offered" by alleged dying and suffering of the

slaveholder or human being’s torment by a shamming the tortured one. Nobody thinks that

someone could be of that execrable malice past comprehension. However, that is Jesus --

those are the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners)!

Seite 8


Not only one of the Nag Hammadi scriptures proves Jesus’ faking allegedly having been

crucified but also several writings do so independently from one another. (Minutiae about

this topic in our treatise on: http://www.yeshu.net).

Apparently a clever Early Christian of the middle of the fourth century wanted to

outwit Rome's despotic suppression and annihilation of all scriptures convicting Christian

desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) of gigantic deceit by putting all the

writings in a jar and that jar into a cave near Nag Hammadi in order to transfer them like a

bottle post to the posterity when Rome is unable to thwart studying them. The Nag

Hammadi scriptures consist of 13 codices and about 1000 pages.

Of course, it took up time to translate those documents. Presumably, the „librarian" of

Nag Hammadi wanted to appeal to posterity to evaluate that evidence against this singular

barbarism. Indeed some of these writings are explosive to Christian deceits and had to be

annihilated in order to maintain Christian sect's swindling on the one hand as forgeries like,

for example, the book the Josephus Flavius or the so called "Constantine Donation“ were to

produce.

That does not necessarily mean that “librarian” of Nag Hammadi intended a

betrayal but that it was about a person unwilling to drive lies and deceits that far Christian

desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) usually do. However, the Nag Hammadi

librarian obviously refused to admit to what consequences one is compelled to follow if once

a (unique) decision is made living a lie or deceiving in certain respects.

Authenticity of the Nag Hammadi scriptures is confirmed because since the end of the

19th century roughly half of all those writings that were found there were detected at other

places, e.g., the pieces of “Oxy-rhyn-chus-Pa-py-ri” found in 1897 and 1904 at other places in

Egypt.

Firstly, after Nag Hammadi one could classify them as parts of the gospel of Thomas.

So one could draw comparisons to that what was found at other places. The Nag

Seite 9


Hammadi “librarian" could not know, for example, what writings could be regained

without him and what could not.

Apart from some incompetent busybodies wanting to earn money, those are the reasons

why Christian barbarism tries to draw attention to Qumran in order to distract it from Nag

Hammadi.

In Nag Hammadi, mainly a lot of oppressed Early Christian chronicles (Christians'

cant: "gospels") were recovered respectively parts of them the Early Christian desperadoes

(Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) presumably wanted to get rid of. They were obstacles to

adjust the rigged up lies and deceit that are called “glad tidings”, at last, e.g., the “Gospel of

Thomas”, the “Apo-cry-phon of James", “Pistis Sophia”, a lot of apocryphal scriptures of

Peter, John and Phillip, “The Gospel according to Maria Magdalene” –- presumably an aunt

of Jesus -- or the "Sophia of Jesus "Christ" " etc. [v]

More over, from the outset the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners) wanted to get rid of chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") that contained pure

teaching of doctrines and not accounts or fabrication of the alleged sufferings of Jesus or his

stuntman. The Early Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) slyly and

correctly realized that the future slaveholder and psycho-tormentor of its victims at best are

introduced in that way that the targeted victims take pity on their future psycho-terrorist and

theirs future psycho-torturers.

In contrast with Nag Hammadi Qumran comprises texts of competing sects to the

Christian one that at best are interesting in that respect that those proverbs Jesus -- the big

bluffer and magician that had become god in that sect -- was blabbing, turns out to be general

drivel of magicians and swindlers who were booming at that time.

However, essentially that had been also known, before. For example, the doctrine of

three realms swindling Jesus had cribbed from Zarathustra -- a Persian prophet, about six to

seven centuries before Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') deceit

started.

Seite 10


From a sect that was developed in a certain degree to Zarathustra we already

mentioned, namely, Mithraism Satanic deceiving Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant:

"innocent" sinners) had cribbed, almost all they were, are and will be -- even those doctrines

of three realms:

Firstly, one understands the realm of past -- a paradise that initially should have existed.

Secondly, the “realm of presence” – that is the current “realm” of the world that came into

existence because of Fall of Man (in the paradise) or something analogical. In the current

“realm”, good and evil are fighting in order to prevail each other.

Thirdly, the „realm of future“ – that are heaven and hell! In heaven as future realm after

death, good and evil will be separated again. The good human beings go to heaven and the

wicked ones to hell.

Those who believe this that picture themselves to go to heaven and all the others will go

to hell. If there is a heaven, in my very person I will ask to go to Muslims’ heaven – the

Christian one is the hell, anyway.

Once more (Who wonders?), Christian Satanic sect even here gets out of line because of

its insatiable vindictiveness and its most refined perfidy: While ones - even Zarathustra –

conceive hell only as a transitory process of purification the mentioned Satanic Christian

sect of “love”, “charity”, “helping the weak and disabled ones”, the one that even is faking to

“love their enemies” (before they assassinate them in the pyre) wants hatred and vengeance

(for their enemies) for ever…!

The hell is eternally according to Jesus (Satan’s) Christ sect. In philosophy and science

of religion this problem is know by the notion of Apokatastasis. Therefore, Satanic Christian

desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) -- including Jesus (Satan’s) Christ – are

standing a good chance of being everlastingly barbecued on a grill in hell.

Seite 11


Why? Because of all their barbarity: Lies, deceits, libeling, reviling murders, stakes,

pyres, wars, yes, for their several genocides, e.g., the holocaust on the Jews, their decimation of

Europe’s population in the years 1618-1648, their genocides on America’s native people,

their bombs in Northern Ireland, their current murders in order to conquer the world in India

and Indonesia – and I predict at soon -- murders and mass murders of Satan’s Christian sect

in China.

The alleged "Saints of the Latter Days" are the first candidates for an eternal residence

in a red-hot pan and getting eternal showers of scorching oil … genuinely according to the

motto: people (and Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners), anyway)

often fall into their own traps… Mohammed tells in the Koran -- the Islamic god's word --

that on doomsday Jesus himself will witness against his adherents (the Christian sinners) to

condemn them that they have to go to hell because they fabricated somewhat of a god's club

and made him (Jesus) and all sorts of blood-relatives of his own members of it.

That is a fine lookout for Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners)

on doomsday! It is recommended that Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners) should also read the Koran because Muhammad is much closer to the truths about

Jesus not only regarding this respect. What arguments do the Christian desperadoes

(Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) have to object to Muhammad? Just their ill wills that

never did recoil even from the grossest hideousness!

All chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") are an amass-ment of lies how to deceive at

best. Jesus is the lie from the very beginning – by the way, a Christian desperadoes'

(Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') definition of the devil! Hark, hark! Concerning the

Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') (barbaric) belief the end justifies

all means and all means come in handy for that (barbaric) belief. Therefore, it is hardly to

differentiate the allegedly authentic from the allegedly non-authentic chronicles (Christians'

cant: "gospels") because there always were at least two “tenets” from the start of this sect: One

for the slaveholders the other one for the slaves.

Therefore, Mark wrote one gospel for the slaves and another one for the slaveholders. As

we already proofed, solely a certain circle of officials of this sect that were proven to be

adamant regarding Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') doctrines

had access to this undisclosed gospel that reported that much about the Jesus slaveholder that

Seite 12


his true face was shown – the true face of the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant:

"innocent" sinners') golden calf that is so carefully disguised by his crowd. Nothing has

changed until today.

The students of Christian „theology ", i.e., students of the Christian desperadoes'

(Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') refined perfidy, learn quite something else than they

will prattle later on to folks from the pulpit of a church.

People in Christian countries are conditioned in believing in “everlasting” and

“unchangeable truths“ and would rightly feel to be sent up by its (Christian) slaveholders if

they now would experience that the allegedly „eternal truths " undergo that many changes.

That is why each Christian cleric is a willful liar and deceiver. He or she is

simultaneously as well victim as well perpetrator of Jesus, the death penalty convict. Just

studying Christian “theology”-- i.e., studying perfidy -- means that there are truths just for

the slaveholders on the one hand, and those ones for the slaves on the other hand.

Well, regarding perfidy what does the current state of lies' interest? Anew, a miracle has

happened: A gospel shall not be authentic because its author wanted to keep it secret

from the outset just because it discloses too much about the swindler and his deceits, i.e., the

author himself indexed it solely for the slaveholders and not for the slaves. Moreover, there

are still folks regarding Jesus’ and Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners') miracles as brazen lies, trickery and sorcery - like that ones of the magicians....

My goodness – what a persecution of Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant:

"innocent" sinners)…! What do the Christian liars and deceivers again and

inadvertently have to suffer...! Distinguishing between diverse "truths” was already done by

the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') chief slaveholder (Jesus),

who already individually took his disciples to task and who did not talk by parables to them

as he did so to folks.

Seite 13


Presumably he secretly promised each disciple something else in private and separate

conversations and thus kept together his gang of sheer egotists and - as we are going to prove

- even of murderers faking very moral ones. The gospel of the Judas-Thomas that was also

detected again at Nag Hammadi delivers an impressive example for that. Jesus asks Thomas

for a talk in private.

When returning his fellows questioned him: What did he say to you? Whereupon

Thomas volumes speaking answered:

Judas Thomas said to them, “ If I tell you but one of the

sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up rocks and stone

me, and fire will come from the rocks and consume you.[vi]

Presumably, he confessed to Thomas that all is fraud and deception but good for

getting famous, good for leading the stupid ones and cerebellums up the garden path and to

make a huge number of slaves and money!

That is the way the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) really

respond when being faced with the truths. Otherwise, such a reaction is not to explain. Jesus

must have conceded disgusting loath-some-ness in private. Under those circumstances, it is a

matter of course that it is hard to find out what all things the big Pied Piper related.

He told to each one something else what the other one could not bear… Basically, he

told everything that was in favor of his deceit according to each situation that allowed him to

do so. Above all, this quotation proves that he flattered the ones at the expenses of the others

in order to keep all at it and to lead them astray them prostrating before him and worshiping

that true failure of nature as their god.

By the way, most -- even of the fanatic disciples – were not convinced of any divinity of

his --- the later Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') god. Questioned

by him whoever he was -- always testing if they are ready to acknowledge that paltry,

miserable and misshapen creature as god -- his disciples answered in that way:

Seite 14


“Jesus said to his disciples, "Compare me to someone and tell me whom

I am like."

Simon Peter said to him, "You are like a righteous angel."

Matthew said to him, "You are like a wise philosopher."

Thomas said to him, "Master, my mouth is wholly incapable of saying

whom you are like."[vii]

Oh, my goodness, nobody – even the closest henchmen – calls him a god or Christ! The Nag

Hammadi scriptures prove that even Peter was not that convinced of this chief slaveholder

Jesus what the New Testament’s chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") feign:

Lu 9:20 RSV

20 And he said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" And Peter

answered, "The Christ of God."

My word! They could be tempted to believe those stupid tricks... However, even in

Thomas' gospel reality is still much embellished. Reality was completely different even from

that and the Nag Hammadi scripture are quite closer to it than the fabrication of the

disclosed chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") is. Thus, John does not admit the following

words in this disclosed gospel however in the "Acts of John“ the following words are passed

on:

„Again, once when all we his disciples were at Gennesaret sleeping in one

house, I (John) alone having wrapped myself in my mantle, watched (or

watched from beneath my mantle) what he should do: and first I (John) heard

him (Jesus) say: John, go thou to sleep. And I thereon feigning to sleep saw

another like unto him [sleeping], whom also I heard say unto my Lord: Jesus,

Seite 15


they whom thou hast chosen believe not yet on thee(or do they not yet,

&c.?). And my Lord said unto him: Thou sayest well…”. [viii]

In this gang of deceivers each knew that each is a swindler and each accused the other to

be what he was: con men.

So, the accounts of Muslims seem to prove to be correct that Jesus (“Hazrat Isa”) at least not

that unequivocally -- -claimed to be a god or god's son. That is only mentioned in the

“official” manipulated chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") that were accepted to the

Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners') New Testament (four chronicles,

Christians' cant: "gospels", of 72 ones).

The Moslems did not agree with the Christian desperadoes' (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners') (deceitful) desire to ban everything the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant:

"innocent" sinners) wanted to annihilate. Thus, it is proven that he actually said everything

what he was: It all depended what for each situation was opportune. If it became dangerous

then he was shamming to be a modest human being and said:

Do not worry about that I am claiming to be the god because every human being is a god

(see Joh 10:34-35). If the situation was more favorable the megalomaniac passed himself off as

an angel, pseudo-philosopher or even “King of the Jews”. And if the situation was very

opportune and the listeners most morons then he even passed himself off as the god – instead

of the god -- to whom all authority in heaven and on earth has been given” (see Mt 28:18). Do

not make me laugh! Jesus lied what allegedly he was or claimed to be -- expediently to each

situation.

As proven here, however even his disciples did not believe the magician’s spook.

Why? Because they knew how he wangled his "miracles“ that should “prove” deity. We

will prove by means of the undisclosed and suppressed chronicles (Christians' cant:

Seite 16


"gospels") that the Jesus’ gang was over and was in very danger to slump apart. Therefore,

hastily they had to strive for the death penalty (suicide, killing on demands) for their chief

slaveholder (Jesus) or his stuntman.

The tensions among one another had become unbearable and were everything but love

after three years of coexistence. His death or that one of his stuntman (suicide or killing on

demand) -- arranged by Jesus himself in that way by perpetrating a felony (usurping the

Jewish crown, keyword: " King of the Jews ") he knew it was punishable by death by the

Roman occupying authorities in Palestine -- strictly speaking rescued the gang from the abyss

of breaking up.

This is not admitted in those chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") that are indexed to the

Christian desperadoes’ Bible but in those Apocrypha that were suppressed from the very

outset!

Even here, one cannot but recommend the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant:

"innocent" sinners) to take a look into Islamic Koran. In Sura 4:157 Muhammad already told

that a stuntman of Jesus was crucified instead of Jesus. Last not least by the Nag Hammadi

scriptures we have the evidence that Muhammad is right. The reasons why Muhammad was

so close about the truths of Jesus are already explained.

157 That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the

Apostle of Allah"; --But they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it

was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts,

with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they

killed him not.”[ix]

His disciples ushered Jesus out whereas the chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") of the

Christian Bible fabricate that he went to heaven forty days after resurrection… (see: Ac. 1:3

Seite 17


and 9). Instead of being in heaven or hell, he became about 80 year of age practicing in much

terrorism after this “crucifixion” and “resurrection”. Not Roman emperor Nero but he

himself perpetrated the utmost execrable, malicious and disgusting felony or atrocity: Setting

Rome to fire in the year 64.

The position of Paul in early Christianity is only to comprehend that Jesus himself

promoted Paul and forced his disciples – especially Peter – to share the power of succession

with the former inveterate enemy or even to subordinate to him. Imagine: I would go to the

pope to tell him that he now has to share his power with me.

The pope and all the Christian desperadoes would rightly laugh at me and make a fun of

me. However, if I would tell him: What is your boss? Jesus? Do you know Mayuam-i-isa?

(That is a hamlet near Damascus. Translated this name means: Where Jesus lived!). We (Jesus

and me) made a pact. Do ask him!

More over, I am entitled to get money from all (Christians)I will preach (see: 2 Co 11:8,

Php 4:18). I will be able to pay for many "miracles" and even to bribe the governor (see: Ac.

24:26) and become the richest Christian. You all will be indebted to me. I will become

famous, rich and will have many women.

Even in captivity, I will beget a son with a Christian woman and I will call him Onesimus

(see: Phm 1:10). To folks I naturally will preach chastity emulating our catamite in Mayuam-

i-isa. Quod licet Jovi no licet bovi! (What is allowed to Jupiter is not allowed to the beef). That

means: What is allowed to Christian swineherds is not allowed to Christian slaves. Now

education comes to you barbarians, doesn’t it? Pope, did you get it?

Now, the matter would change dramatically. More over, Paul himself could not

resist temptation to tell the governor that Jesus was still alive:

Seite 18


Ac 25:19 RSV

19 but they (the Jews) had certain points of dispute with him (Paul) about their own

superstition and about one Jesus, who was dead, but whom Paul asserted to be alive.

Here, Paul does not say that Jesus has died. That is what his Jewish enemies say, here.

Paul relates to the governor that his Roman fellows failed to kill death penalty convict Jesus,

who consequently is still alive.

Jesus directed his new sect via Peter and Paul from Syria (later presumably from

Cyprus and Tripoli) and enjoyed every much being worshiped as the new god of the new

sect. If he would not had lived further on, than certainly Peter would have become leader of

the new sect.

Of course, everything of that is not written in those chronicles (Christians' cant:

"gospels") that were indexed to the Christian Bible however, this is intimated in one of the

undisclosed and suppressed ones (James’ secret book and others) that are only for the

slaveholders and not for the slaves. If the Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent"

sinners) today claim that many chronicles (Christians' cant: "gospels") - especially those ones

for the slaveholders and not for the slaves – are apocryphal then they thus

inadvertently prove that lies and deception are very matters of course to this sect of liars and

swindlers. Forgeries just came into existence because falsehood and hypocrisy are the soul the

Christian desperadoes (Christians' cant: "innocent" sinners) are breathing from their very

start by Jesus.

In one of the Nag Hammadi scriptures, it is reported how the 11 disciples (Judas Iscariot

was already expelled and killed) were on a trip to visit that alleged gone to heaven "god"

Jesus in the Mediterranean and how Jesus disguised himself and what cover name he used.

Perhaps you heard already that Jesus was criticized for never having laughed. The Nag

Hammadi scriptures change that picture of him. When his stuntman was on the cross

suffering death penalty and all the people thought having punished the real evildoer, that

Seite 19


evildoer (Jesus) is reported having a little snigger.

So, one cannot say that Jesus was unable to laugh. His stuntman’s crucifixion gave a lift to

the Jesus gang until today because Jesus thus demonstrated how easily one could deceive the

world if one just is unscrupulous enough and does not tolerate any truths, reality and facts.

It’s just a matter how thoroughly and intransigent one is dedicated and determined to evil –

and nothing else. Deceiving the whole world is possible – that is Jesus’ tiding of Golgotha.

Thus, his adherents became encouraged committing the utmost deceit and nastiest barbarity

of humankind.

Page before: Why There are so many Non-Authentic Gospels in Christian sect?

Next page: The Apocryphon of James

Second next page: Pertaining the Chronological Table of the Disclosed Gospels

Following page: The Reasons for Disputing the Chronological Table of the Gospels

PREVIOUS | HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS| NEWS | THE

CROSS DECEPTION | CHRIST AND ANTI-CHRIST | WHAT DID JESUS LOOK

LIKE? | THE (CRIBBED) STAR OF BETHLEHEM | APHORISM | MY STUFF

|NEXT |

© 1998 - 2003 HANS HENNING ATROTT - All rights reserved.- Reproduction only for private use and/or purposes of studying and archiving by research and/or library institutes -

otherwise without permission strictly prohibited. This site is still under construction -

Annotations:

[i] M. J. Vermassen, Mithras, The Secret God, (London, 1963), P. 104.

[ii] ibidem -- Pertaining the fable of Jesus' birth see: The (cribbed) Star of

Seite 20


Bethlehem on: http://www.atrott.freeservers.com/bethlehem.htm

[iii] Christendom as a Mithraic sect see: H. Atrott, The (cribbed) Star of Bethlehem, on: http://www.geo-ci-ties.com/birth-ofje-sus

[iv] See: Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, Henry Lincoln, das Vermächtnis des

Messias, Ber-gisch-Glad-bach 1987, S. 89 English edition: The Messianic

Legacy, Jonathan Cape Ltd., London, 1986 See first book, Chapter 6

(Formation of Christianity, The Nazarenes)

[v] A survey of the Nag Hammadi scripture in English is on:

http://www.webcom.com/~gnosis/naghamm/nhl.html

[vi] Gospel of Judas Thomas, (NHC II,2), XXX , on:

http://www.openingline.co.uk/tongue/gospel.htm

[vii] The Gospel of Thomas, Translated by Thomas O. Lambdin, Legion 13,

http://www.webcom.com/~gnosis/naghamm/gthlamb.html <>

[viii] ACTS OF JOHN, From "The Apocryphal New Testament", M.R. James-

Translation and Notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924 , Scanned and Edited

by Joshua Williams, Northwest Nazarene College, 1995, on:

http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/acts/actjohn.htm § 92

[ix] Koran Su 4:157 Yusuf Ali Edition of 1935

Seite 21

Documents

The so-called 'authentic and apocryphal Gospels, …bare-jesus.net/e005.pdf · The so-called "authentic“ and “apocryphal“ Gospels, Qumran, Nag Hammadi, Koran and Mithraism This