Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE SPECTRAL THEORYOF QUANTUM CURVES
AND TOPOLOGICAL STRINGS
Marcos MariñoUniversity of Geneva
What is a quantum curve?
Algebraic curves are ubiquitous in modern mathematical physics
1) Seiberg-Witten curves of supersymmetric gauge theories
2) Mirror manifolds to toric (non-compact) Calabi-Yaus
3) “Spectral curves” for large N matrix models
4) Spectral curves for integrable systems
5) A-polynomials of knots
0) WKB curve in one-dimensional quantum mechanics
⌃(x, p) = 0
In all these problems, the “classical” theory is described by the periods of the Liouville one-form
p(x)dx
<latexit sha1_base64="UlihYVrwOretgydfHTV0Sc6i3q8=">AAAB9XicbVBNSwMxEJ31s9avqkcvwSLUS9mVgnorevFYwX5Au5ZsNm1Dk+ySZLVl6f/w4kERr/4Xb/4b03YP2vpg4PHeDDPzgpgzbVz321lZXVvf2Mxt5bd3dvf2CweHDR0litA6iXikWgHWlDNJ64YZTluxolgEnDaD4c3Ubz5SpVkk7804pr7Afcl6jGBjpYe4NDpDaUcJFE7QqFsoumV3BrRMvIwUIUOtW/jqhBFJBJWGcKx123Nj46dYGUY4neQ7iaYxJkPcp21LJRZU++ns6gk6tUqIepGyJQ2aqb8nUiy0HovAdgpsBnrRm4r/ee3E9C79lMk4MVSS+aJewpGJ0DQCFDJFieFjSzBRzN6KyAArTIwNKm9D8BZfXiaN87JXKV/dVYrV6yyOHBzDCZTAgwuowi3UoA4EFDzDK7w5T86L8+58zFtXnGzmCP7A+fwBQPGRug==</latexit>
along the one-cycles of the curve
An important example for this talk is local mirror symmetry
toric Calabi-Yau manifold X
mirror curve
⌃(ex, ep) = 0
<latexit sha1_base64="F7egpDwergs/uFlPbE+zZ1v/Cvg=">AAACB3icbZDLSgMxFIYz9VbrbdSlIMEiVJAyIxXdCEU3LivaC3TGkknTNjTJDElGLEN3bnwVNy4UcesruPNtTNsRtPWHwMd/zuHk/EHEqNKO82Vl5uYXFpeyy7mV1bX1DXtzq6bCWGJSxSELZSNAijAqSFVTzUgjkgTxgJF60L8Y1et3RCoaihs9iIjPUVfQDsVIG6tl73rXtMtRIfEkh2R4e38IfzA6OHNadt4pOmPBWXBTyINUlZb96bVDHHMiNGZIqabrRNpPkNQUMzLMebEiEcJ91CVNgwJxovxkfMcQ7hunDTuhNE9oOHZ/TySIKzXggenkSPfUdG1k/ldrxrpz6idURLEmAk8WdWIGdQhHocA2lQRrNjCAsKTmrxD3kERYm+hyJgR3+uRZqB0V3VLx+KqUL5+ncWTBDtgDBeCCE1AGl6ACqgCDB/AEXsCr9Wg9W2/W+6Q1Y6Uz2+CPrI9vRj2YSg==</latexit>
Here, the periods of the Liouville form determine the “prepotential” of topological string theory on X.
AA
BB
mirror map
genus zero GW invariants
t =
I
Ap(x)dx
<latexit sha1_base64="1RkzIj6L669MaQN0k7WNuPSOgs8=">AAACAXicbVA9SwNBEN2LXzF+RW0Em8UgxCbcSUAthKiNZQTzAUkIe3t7yZK9vWN3ThKO2PhXbCwUsfVf2Plv3CRXaOKDgcd7M8zMcyPBNdj2t5VZWl5ZXcuu5zY2t7Z38rt7dR3GirIaDUWomi7RTHDJasBBsGakGAlcwRru4GbiNx6Y0jyU9zCKWCcgPcl9TgkYqZs/gEvcDrmE7hWOisMTnLRVgL3xsJsv2CV7CrxInJQUUIpqN//V9kIaB0wCFUTrlmNH0EmIAk4FG+fasWYRoQPSYy1DJQmY7iTTD8b42Cge9kNlSgKeqr8nEhJoPQpc0xkQ6Ot5byL+57Vi8M87CZdRDEzS2SI/FhhCPIkDe1wxCmJkCKGKm1sx7RNFKJjQciYEZ/7lRVI/LTnl0sVduVC5TuPIokN0hIrIQWeogm5RFdUQRY/oGb2iN+vJerHerY9Za8ZKZ/bRH1ifP8M+ldY=</latexit>
@F0
@t=
I
Bp(x)dx
<latexit sha1_base64="sQ1K7tXQ0j708JYpOmg9aHM4g5U=">AAACH3icbVDLSsNAFJ3UV62vqks3g0Wom5JI8bEQSgVxWcE+oAlhMpm0QyeTMDORltA/ceOvuHGhiLjr3zhtg2jrgYHDOfdy5xwvZlQq05wYuZXVtfWN/GZha3tnd6+4f9CSUSIwaeKIRaLjIUkY5aSpqGKkEwuCQo+Rtje4mfrtRyIkjfiDGsXECVGP04BipLTkFs9TO0ZCUcTgrWtCO9LD8EdS42stUa7cOozLw1OY2iKE/njoFktmxZwBLhMrIyWQoeEWv2w/wklIuMIMSdm1zFg56fQOZmRcsBNJYoQHqEe6mnIUEumks3xjeKIVHwaR0I8rOFN/b6QolHIUenoyRKovF72p+J/XTVRw6aSUx4kiHM8PBYnOHcFpWdCngmDFRpogLKj+K8R9JBBWutKCLsFajLxMWmcVq1q5uq+WavWsjjw4AsegDCxwAWrgDjRAE2DwBF7AG3g3no1X48P4nI/mjGznEPyBMfkGawyh+g==</latexit>
F0(t) =X
d�1
N0,de�dt
<latexit sha1_base64="ylfIf3XyD0lT3obkKVJLEYysgO0=">AAACFXicbVBNS8NAEN34bf2qevSyWAQFLYkI6kEQBfEkFawKTQ2bzbRd3E3C7kQoIX/Ci3/FiwdFvAre/DduPw5+PRh4vDfDzLwwlcKg6346I6Nj4xOTU9Olmdm5+YXy4tKlSTLNoc4TmejrkBmQIoY6CpRwnWpgKpRwFd4e9/yrO9BGJPEFdlNoKtaORUtwhlYKypsngbuOGwfUN5kK8shvA/UKehbk7mZU0NzXikJxk29FFIugXHGrbh/0L/GGpEKGqAXlDz9KeKYgRi6ZMQ3PTbGZM42CSyhKfmYgZfyWtaFhacwUmGbe/6qga1aJaCvRtmKkffX7RM6UMV0V2k7FsGN+ez3xP6+RYWuvmYs4zRBiPljUyiTFhPYiopHQwFF2LWFcC3sr5R2mGUcbZMmG4P1++S+53K56O9X9853K4dEwjimyQlbJOvHILjkkp6RG6oSTe/JInsmL8+A8Oa/O26B1xBnOLJMfcN6/AGOTnSM=</latexit>
ex + ep + e�p�x + u = 0
<latexit sha1_base64="tgx9L5HQQZyAc3KM/pTgH/2mksQ=">AAACEXicbZDLSsNAFIYn9VbrLerSzWARCqUlkYK6EIpuXFawF2hjmUwn7dCZJMxMpCXkFdz4Km5cKOLWnTvfxmmbgrb+MPDxn3M4c343ZFQqy/o2Miura+sb2c3c1vbO7p65f9CQQSQwqeOABaLlIkkY9UldUcVIKxQEcZeRpju8ntSbD0RIGvh3ahwSh6O+Tz2KkdJW1yzEHcEhSe5HxTmFRTjHuBSWRkkRRpdW18xbZWsquAx2CnmQqtY1vzq9AEec+AozJGXbtkLlxEgoihlJcp1IkhDhIeqTtkYfcSKdeHpRAk+004NeIPTzFZy6vydixKUcc1d3cqQGcrE2Mf+rtSPlnTsx9cNIER/PFnkRgyqAk3hgjwqCFRtrQFhQ/VeIB0ggrHSIOR2CvXjyMjROy3alfHFbyVev0jiy4AgcgwKwwRmoghtQA3WAwSN4Bq/gzXgyXox342PWmjHSmUPwR8bnD7avnE4=</latexit>
This looks very much like a WKB approximation to a quantum mechanical problem underlying the curve
Therefore, it is tempting to think that the corrections to the “classical” theory can be obtained by “quantizing” the curve
in an appropriate way
In the case of local mirror symmetry, this leads to the idea that the higher genus free energies of the topological string
Fg(t) =X
d�1
Ng,de�dt
<latexit sha1_base64="Z7CvtSfvtjqQJHq7KkmFjYTdzik=">AAACFHicbVBNS8NAEN34bf2qevSyWARFLYkI6kEQBfEkClaFpobNZhoXd5OwOxFKyI/w4l/x4kERrx68+W/c1h78ejDweG+GmXlhJoVB1/1wBgaHhkdGx8YrE5NT0zPV2blzk+aaQ4OnMtWXITMgRQINFCjhMtPAVCjhIrw56PoXt6CNSJMz7GTQUixORFtwhlYKqquHQbyMK7vUN7kKisiPgXolPQ6KeC0qC18rCuVVsR5RLINqza27PdC/xOuTGunjJKi++1HKcwUJcsmMaXpuhq2CaRRcQlnxcwMZ4zcshqalCVNgWkXvqZIuWSWi7VTbSpD21O8TBVPGdFRoOxXDa/Pb64r/ec0c29utQiRZjpDwr0XtXFJMaTchGgkNHGXHEsa1sLdSfs0042hzrNgQvN8v/yXnG3Vvs75zulnb2+/HMUYWyCJZJh7ZInvkiJyQBuHkjjyQJ/Ls3DuPzovz+tU64PRn5skPOG+ftZKdZw==</latexit>
can be obtained by “quantizing” the mirror curve [ADKMV]
Perturbative quantization schemes
There are two perturbative quantization schemes for curves which produce a series of quantum corrections to
the prepotential.
The first one is based on a direct quantization of the curve, by promoting the canonically conjugate x,p variables to
Heisenberg operators
[x, p] = i~
⌃(x, p = �i~@x) (x, ~) = 0
<latexit sha1_base64="11FWeyJQWzSwzVSKhR9kfQXMbHc=">AAACIHicbVDLSgMxFM34rPVVdekmWAQFLTNSqC4KRTcuK9pW6AzDnTRtQ5OZIclIy9BPceOvuHGhiO70a8y0Xfg6EDiccy439wQxZ0rb9oc1N7+wuLScW8mvrq1vbBa2tpsqSiShDRLxSN4GoChnIW1opjm9jSUFEXDaCgYXmd+6o1KxKLzRo5h6Anoh6zIC2kh+oeJes56Ag+ERjqvHqSsFZmPs9gOQ2I1BagbcHx4arlgWmjiHVdsvFO2SPQH+S5wZKaIZ6n7h3e1EJBE01ISDUm3HjrWXZhsIp+O8mygaAxlAj7YNDUFQ5aWTA8d43ygd3I2keaHGE/X7RApCqZEITFKA7qvfXib+57UT3T31UhbGiaYhmS7qJhzrCGdt4Q6TlGg+MgSIZOavmPRBAtGm07wpwfl98l/SPCk55dLZVblYO5/VkUO7aA8dIAdVUA1dojpqIILu0SN6Ri/Wg/VkvVpv0+icNZvZQT9gfX4BrHqhcQ==</latexit>
This leads to a Schroedinger-type equation
p(x, ~) ⇠ p(x) +X
n�1
pn(x)~2n
One can now use the all-orders WKB method to obtain “quantum” versions of the Liouville form and the periods
t(~) =I
Ap(x, ~)dx
<latexit sha1_base64="oiIAP+vcJgO/1FfBx2FlsDd3nKc=">AAACDnicbVDLSgNBEJz1GeMr6tHLYAhEkLArAfUgRL14jGAekF2W2ckkGTI7u8z0SsKSL/Dir3jxoIhXz978GyePgyYWNBRV3XR3BbHgGmz721paXlldW89sZDe3tnd2c3v7dR0lirIajUSkmgHRTHDJasBBsGasGAkDwRpB/2bsNx6Y0jyS9zCMmReSruQdTgkYyc8VoOj2AqKOL92IS/CvcFwcnOCphlNXhbg9Gvi5vF2yJ8CLxJmRPJqh6ue+3HZEk5BJoIJo3XLsGLyUKOBUsFHWTTSLCe2TLmsZKknItJdO3hnhglHauBMpUxLwRP09kZJQ62EYmM6QQE/Pe2PxP6+VQOfcS7mME2CSThd1EoEhwuNscJsrRkEMDSFUcXMrpj2iCAWTYNaE4My/vEjqpyWnXLq4K+cr17M4MugQHaEictAZqqBbVEU1RNEjekav6M16sl6sd+tj2rpkzWYO0B9Ynz/lVZrH</latexit>
@F (t, ~)@t
=
I
Bp(x, ~)dx
<latexit sha1_base64="XOPE0DI8UsyAR66KSY6+yPH+YCQ=">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</latexit>
This procedure was applied to SW/mirror curves by [Mironov-Morozov, ACDKV]
However, the quantum prepotential obtained in this way
F (t, ~) =X
n�0
Fn(t)~2n
<latexit sha1_base64="4byIWGXAn/uH9UDJP+23BGDAzOg=">AAACFnicbVDLSgNBEJyNrxhfUY9eBoOQgIbdEFAPQlAIHiOYB2TjMjuZJENmZ5eZXiEs+Qov/ooXD4p4FW/+jZPHQaMFDUVVN91dfiS4Btv+slJLyyura+n1zMbm1vZOdnevocNYUVanoQhVyyeaCS5ZHTgI1ooUI4EvWNMfXk385j1TmofyFkYR6wSkL3mPUwJG8rIn1TwcY3fgE1W4wK6OAy+R2O0zbI9x1ZN5KMzcu6Qkx142ZxftKfBf4sxJDs1R87KfbjekccAkUEG0bjt2BJ2EKOBUsHHGjTWLCB2SPmsbKknAdCeZvjXGR0bp4l6oTEnAU/XnREICrUeBbzoDAgO96E3E/7x2DL2zTsJlFAOTdLaoFwsMIZ5khLtcMQpiZAihiptbMR0QRSiYJDMmBGfx5b+kUSo65eL5TTlXuZzHkUYH6BDlkYNOUQVdoxqqI4oe0BN6Qa/Wo/VsvVnvs9aUNZ/ZR79gfXwDpiudOw==</latexit>
does not describe the usual topological string free energy. Rather, it gives the so-called “Nekrasov-Shatashvili
free energy”
A different “quantization” scheme is obtained by the topological recursion of Eynard-Orantin
⌃(x, p) ! {Fg(t)}g=0,1,2,···
<latexit sha1_base64="saPgu+6H4PA9BmA7+E6a1TjG90w=">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</latexit>
This does give the topological string free energies (BKMP conjecture, now a theorem) but there is no obvious
relation to conventional quantization
There has been recent progress in relating topological recursion to some sort of quantization of the curve [Bouchard-
Eynard, Iwaki, Eynard-Garcia Failde, Orantin-Marchal], but their resulting quantum curves have infinitely many quantum corrections and
I will not follow this route
Another shortcoming is that these approaches are perturbative in nature.
We recall that the “total free energy” of topological string theory
F (t, gs) =X
g�0
Fg(t)g2g�2s
<latexit sha1_base64="8sUqGHS+RpQhiDsMYXHp22kUWmU=">AAACFHicbVDJSgNBEO2JW4zbqEcvjUFIUMNMCKgHISgEjxHMAkkcejqdSZOehe4aIQz5CC/+ihcPinj14M2/sbMcNPFBweO9KqrquZHgCizr20gtLa+srqXXMxubW9s75u5eXYWxpKxGQxHKpksUEzxgNeAgWDOSjPiuYA13cD32Gw9MKh4GdzCMWMcnXsB7nBLQkmMeV3Jwgj1H5S9xW8W+k3i47TFsjXDF8XKQH3v3SdE7LY4cM2sVrAnwIrFnJItmqDrmV7sb0thnAVBBlGrZVgSdhEjgVLBRph0rFhE6IB5raRoQn6lOMnlqhI+00sW9UOoKAE/U3xMJ8ZUa+q7u9An01bw3Fv/zWjH0zjsJD6IYWECni3qxwBDicUK4yyWjIIaaECq5vhXTPpGEgs4xo0Ow519eJPViwS4VLm5L2fLVLI40OkCHKIdsdIbK6AZVUQ1R9Iie0St6M56MF+Pd+Ji2pozZzD76A+PzB2Szm/E=</latexit>
does not define a function, since it is a factorially divergent series
Fg(t) ⇠ (2g)!
<latexit sha1_base64="zZY0Xygj3EdSCa8VDOvUftDpvFg=">AAAB+nicbVDLSgMxFM3UV62vqS7dRIvQbspMKai7oiAuK9gHtMOQSTPT0CQzJBml1H6KGxeKuPVL3Pk3pu0stPXAhcM593LvPUHCqNKO823l1tY3Nrfy24Wd3b39A7t42FZxKjFp4ZjFshsgRRgVpKWpZqSbSIJ4wEgnGF3P/M4DkYrG4l6PE+JxFAkaUoy0kXy7eONHZV2BfUU5LNeiyolvl5yqMwdcJW5GSiBD07e/+oMYp5wIjRlSquc6ifYmSGqKGZkW+qkiCcIjFJGeoQJxorzJ/PQpPDPKAIaxNCU0nKu/JyaIKzXmgenkSA/VsjcT//N6qQ4vvAkVSaqJwItFYcqgjuEsBzigkmDNxoYgLKm5FeIhkghrk1bBhOAuv7xK2rWqW69e3tVLjassjjw4BqegDFxwDhrgFjRBC2DwCJ7BK3iznqwX6936WLTmrGzmCPyB9fkDWZKSIg==</latexit>
Topological recursion does not give much insight on this problem.
A full quantum realization of topological string theory should give a non-perturbative definition of the theory, in
which the series appears as the asymptotic expansion of a well-defined function.
It turns out that progress along this direction can be made if one looks at the quantum curve as an operator on the
natural Hilbert space L2(R)
This might seem unnatural from the point of view of complex geometry, since the spectral theory of operators is very sensitive to reality and positivity issues. However,
one can “complexify” afterwards, as we will see.
Operators from curves
By quantizing interesting families of curves one obtains well-known operators on , as well as new ones:L2(R)
1) SW curves of Argyres-Douglas theories lead to Schroedinger operators with polynomial potentials
[e.g. Ito-Shu, Grassi-Gu]
p2 + VN (x)� E = 0
2) SW curves of SU(N) theories lead to deformed Schroedinger operators [Grassi-M.M.]
H = p2 + VN (x)
H = 2 cosh p+ VN (x)2 cosh(p) + VN (x)� E = 0
<latexit sha1_base64="8T7E8/azWHz3o/wMmHBxQgnIeos=">AAAB/nicbVDLSgMxFM3UV62vUXHlJliEFrHMlIK6EIoiuJIK9gHtMGTS1IZmkiHJiGUo+CtuXCji1u9w59+YtrPQ1gMXDufcy733BBGjSjvOt5VZWFxaXsmu5tbWNza37O2dhhKxxKSOBROyFSBFGOWkrqlmpBVJgsKAkWYwuBz7zQciFRX8Tg8j4oXontMexUgbybf3yh0sVL8QFY9gw78pPBaPr84d3847JWcCOE/clORBippvf3W6Asch4RozpFTbdSLtJUhqihkZ5TqxIhHCA3RP2oZyFBLlJZPzR/DQKF3YE9IU13Ci/p5IUKjUMAxMZ4h0X816Y/E/rx3r3qmXUB7FmnA8XdSLGdQCjrOAXSoJ1mxoCMKSmlsh7iOJsDaJ5UwI7uzL86RRLrmV0tltJV+9SOPIgn1wAArABSegCq5BDdQBBgl4Bq/gzXqyXqx362PamrHSmV3wB9bnD9QIk3s=</latexit>
3) Mirror curves of toric CYs lead to a new family of “Weyl” or exponentiated Heisenberg operators
OP2 = ex + ep + e�x�p
OF0 = ex + ⇠F0e�x + ep + e�p
(1, 0)(1, 0)(�1, 0)(�1, 0)
(0,�1)(0,�1)
(0, 1)(0, 1)
X ! OX
<latexit sha1_base64="oKcVRPGNCzc5wN1cX52+a6H7tug=">AAACBXicbVBNS8NAEN3Ur1q/oh71sFgETyWRgnorevFmBdsGmhA22027dJMNuxulhFy8+Fe8eFDEq//Bm//GbZqDtj4YeLw3w8y8IGFUKsv6NipLyyura9X12sbm1vaOubvXlTwVmHQwZ1w4AZKE0Zh0FFWMOIkgKAoY6QXjq6nfuydCUh7fqUlCvAgNYxpSjJSWfPPQga6gw5FCQvAHmLkRUiMZZjd57ju+WbcaVgG4SOyS1EGJtm9+uQOO04jECjMkZd+2EuVlSCiKGclrbipJgvAYDUlf0xhFRHpZ8UUOj7UygCEXumIFC/X3RIYiKSdRoDuLI+e9qfif109VeO5lNE5SRWI8WxSmDCoOp5HAARUEKzbRBGFB9a0Qj5BAWOngajoEe/7lRdI9bdjNxsVts966LOOoggNwBE6ADc5AC1yDNugADB7BM3gFb8aT8WK8Gx+z1opRzuyDPzA+fwDtrZjh</latexit>
For simplicity I will consider polytopes with a single inner point
The spectral problem defined by quantum curves is therefore a fascinating generalization of the spectral theory of one-dimensional Schroedinger operators
The main question we want to address is:is there a relation between the spectral theory of these
operators, and the geometric, “quantum” objects associated to the underlying curves?
I will from now on focus on (local) mirror curves
Spectral theory
The operator ⇢X = O�1X
is positive definite and of trace class
Theorem [Grassi-Hatsuda-
M.M., Kashaev-M.M., Laptev-Schimmer-
Takhtakjan]
on L2(R)
e�En , n = 0, 1, · · ·
and all its traces are finite
Tr ⇢`X =X
n�0
e�`En < 1, ` = 1, 2, · · ·
(assuming and some conditions on “mass parameters”)
~ > 0
<latexit sha1_base64="EN39tOkt7fNzP+vAD0EIB5PQMCg=">AAAB7nicbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/qh69LBbBU0mkoF6k6MVjBfsBbSib7aZdutmE3YlQQn+EFw+KePX3ePPfuG1z0NYHA4/3ZpiZFyRSGHTdb6ewtr6xuVXcLu3s7u0flA+PWiZONeNNFstYdwJquBSKN1Gg5J1EcxoFkreD8d3Mbz9xbUSsHnGScD+iQyVCwShaqd0bBVTfuP1yxa26c5BV4uWkAjka/fJXbxCzNOIKmaTGdD03QT+jGgWTfFrqpYYnlI3pkHctVTTixs/m507JmVUGJIy1LYVkrv6eyGhkzCQKbGdEcWSWvZn4n9dNMbzyM6GSFLlii0VhKgnGZPY7GQjNGcqJJZRpYW8lbEQ1ZWgTKtkQvOWXV0nrourVqtcPtUr9No+jCCdwCufgwSXU4R4a0AQGY3iGV3hzEufFeXc+Fq0FJ585hj9wPn8AvgSPMw==</latexit>
Discrete spectrum
Since the operator is of trace class, we can define its Fredholm determinant
which is an entire function of
⌅X() = det (1 + ⇢X) =Y
n�0
�1 + eµ�En
�
= eµ
It can be shown that is identified with the modulus of the CY, therefore this is an entire function on the CY moduli
space
“fermionic” spectral traces
= 1 +1X
N=1
ZX(N, ~)N⌅X()
<latexit sha1_base64="yopYG22f31iypM/iQJsR4hvyjEg=">AAAB9XicbVBNSwMxEJ31s9avqkcvwSLUS9mVgnorevFYwbYL3bVk02wbms2GJKuU0v/hxYMiXv0v3vw3pu0etPXBwOO9GWbmRZIzbVz321lZXVvf2CxsFbd3dvf2SweHLZ1mitAmSXmq/AhrypmgTcMMp75UFCcRp+1oeDP1249UaZaKezOSNExwX7CYEWys9BD4rOujSjDEUuKzbqnsVt0Z0DLxclKGHI1u6SvopSRLqDCEY607nitNOMbKMMLppBhkmkpMhrhPO5YKnFAdjmdXT9CpVXooTpUtYdBM/T0xxonWoySynQk2A73oTcX/vE5m4stwzITMDBVkvijOODIpmkaAekxRYvjIEkwUs7ciMsAKE2ODKtoQvMWXl0nrvOrVqld3tXL9Oo+jAMdwAhXw4ALqcAsNaAIBBc/wCm/Ok/PivDsf89YVJ585gj9wPn8ASzGRwA==</latexit>
<latexit sha1_base64="WlDQHjMqvpFJ+Vnb7Bm8iJDquP0=">AAAB7XicbVBNSwMxEM3Wr1q/qh69BIvgqexKQb0VvXisYD+gXcpsmm1js0lIskJZ+h+8eFDEq//Hm//GtN2Dtj4YeLw3w8y8SHFmrO9/e4W19Y3NreJ2aWd3b/+gfHjUMjLVhDaJ5FJ3IjCUM0GblllOO0pTSCJO29H4dua3n6g2TIoHO1E0TGAoWMwIWCe1emNQCvrlil/158CrJMhJBeVo9MtfvYEkaUKFJRyM6Qa+smEG2jLC6bTUSw1VQMYwpF1HBSTUhNn82ik+c8oAx1K7EhbP1d8TGSTGTJLIdSZgR2bZm4n/ed3UxldhxoRKLRVksShOObYSz17HA6YpsXziCBDN3K2YjEADsS6gkgshWH55lbQuqkGten1fq9Rv8jiK6ASdonMUoEtUR3eogZqIoEf0jF7Rmye9F+/d+1i0Frx85hj9gff5A5oMjys=</latexit>
-150 -100 -50
-0.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
zeroes= spectrum �eEn
⌅P2(, 2⇡)
At weak coupling, when , these quantities are related to the NS topological string
~ ! 0
<latexit sha1_base64="E1UCSgMHfjTKzBzgaXOXo9nAFqg=">AAAB/HicbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/oj16WSyCp5JIQb0VvXisYD+gCWWz3TRLN5uwu1FCqX/FiwdFvPpDvPlv3LY5aOuDgcd7M8zMC1LOlHacb6u0tr6xuVXeruzs7u0f2IdHHZVkktA2SXgiewFWlDNB25ppTnuppDgOOO0G45uZ332gUrFE3Os8pX6MR4KFjGBtpIFd9aIAS+RJNoo0ljJ5RM7Arjl1Zw60StyC1KBAa2B/ecOEZDEVmnCsVN91Uu1PsNSMcDqteJmiKSZjPKJ9QwWOqfIn8+On6NQoQxQm0pTQaK7+npjgWKk8DkxnjHWklr2Z+J/Xz3R46U+YSDNNBVksCjOOdIJmSaAhk5RonhuCiWTmVkQiLDHRJq+KCcFdfnmVdM7rbqN+ddeoNa+LOMpwDCdwBi5cQBNuoQVtIJDDM7zCm/VkvVjv1seitWQVM1X4A+vzBzi3lIM=</latexit>
Surprisingly, the strong coupling limit leads to the conventional topological string
~ ! 1
<latexit sha1_base64="uEwE6V57ygv6JB+cqp1jcEkfx0c=">AAACAXicbVDLSsNAFJ34rPUVdSO4GSyCq5JIQd0V3bisYB/QhDKZTpqhk0mYuVFCqBt/xY0LRdz6F+78G6ePhbYeuHA4517uvSdIBdfgON/W0vLK6tp6aaO8ubW9s2vv7bd0kinKmjQRieoERDPBJWsCB8E6qWIkDgRrB8Prsd++Z0rzRN5BnjI/JgPJQ04JGKlnH3pRQBT2FB9EQJRKHrDHZQh5z644VWcCvEjcGamgGRo9+8vrJzSLmQQqiNZd10nBL4gCTgUblb1Ms5TQIRmwrqGSxEz7xeSDET4xSh+HiTIlAU/U3xMFibXO48B0xgQiPe+Nxf+8bgbhhV9wmWbAJJ0uCjOBIcHjOHCfK0ZB5IYQqri5FdOIKELBhFY2IbjzLy+S1lnVrVUvb2uV+tUsjhI6QsfoFLnoHNXRDWqgJqLoET2jV/RmPVkv1rv1MW1dsmYzB+gPrM8fpXKXCw==</latexit>
The strong coupling result is conveniently formulated by using topological string theory in “conifold” coordinates. We recall that, in the moduli space of the CY, there is a conifold point where the
mirror curve becomes singular.
Re(t) ! 1Re(t) ! 1
conifold pointtc = 0
<latexit sha1_base64="GbyF+seeFMd3a+uU2O9o7sirbMg=">AAAB7HicbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/qh69LBbBU0mkoB6EohePFUxbaEPZbDft0s0m7E6EUvobvHhQxKs/yJv/xm2bg7Y+GHi8N8PMvDCVwqDrfjuFtfWNza3idmlnd2//oHx41DRJphn3WSIT3Q6p4VIo7qNAydup5jQOJW+Fo7uZ33ri2ohEPeI45UFMB0pEglG0ko89duP2yhW36s5BVomXkwrkaPTKX91+wrKYK2SSGtPx3BSDCdUomOTTUjczPKVsRAe8Y6miMTfBZH7slJxZpU+iRNtSSObq74kJjY0Zx6HtjCkOzbI3E//zOhlGV8FEqDRDrthiUZRJggmZfU76QnOGcmwJZVrYWwkbUk0Z2nxKNgRv+eVV0ryoerXq9UOtUr/N4yjCCZzCOXhwCXW4hwb4wEDAM7zCm6OcF+fd+Vi0Fpx85hj+wPn8AUb+jls=</latexit>
large radius
We can parametrize the moduli space by a special vanishing coordinate at the conifold, tc
<latexit sha1_base64="vatjQD6dJJFOsJufYTPrHZxcK+0=">AAAB6nicbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/qh69LBbBU0mkoN6KXjxWtB/QhrLZbtqlm03YnQgl9Cd48aCIV3+RN/+N2zYHbX0w8Hhvhpl5QSKFQdf9dgpr6xubW8Xt0s7u3v5B+fCoZeJUM95ksYx1J6CGS6F4EwVK3kk0p1EgeTsY38789hPXRsTqEScJ9yM6VCIUjKKVHrDP+uWKW3XnIKvEy0kFcjT65a/eIGZpxBUySY3pem6CfkY1Cib5tNRLDU8oG9Mh71qqaMSNn81PnZIzqwxIGGtbCslc/T2R0ciYSRTYzojiyCx7M/E/r5tieOVnQiUpcsUWi8JUEozJ7G8yEJozlBNLKNPC3krYiGrK0KZTsiF4yy+vktZF1atVr+9rlfpNHkcRTuAUzsGDS6jDHTSgCQyG8Ayv8OZI58V5dz4WrQUnnzmGP3A+fwBVQI3a</latexit>
A conjecture
Let us consider the following ’t Hooft limit of the fermionic spectral traces
N ! 1 ~ ! 1
Then,
N
~ = tc
<latexit sha1_base64="HJTnc4JeYSlrOW5DBCutncq6cT8=">AAAB/nicbVDLSsNAFL3xWesrKq7cDBbBVUmkoC6EohtXUsE+oAlhMp20QyeTMDMRSij4K25cKOLW73Dn3zhts9DWAwOHc87l3jlhypnSjvNtLS2vrK6tlzbKm1vbO7v23n5LJZkktEkSnshOiBXlTNCmZprTTiopjkNO2+HwZuK3H6lULBEPepRSP8Z9wSJGsDZSYB/md8hLTAJ5gxDLMbpCOiCBXXGqzhRokbgFqUCBRmB/eb2EZDEVmnCsVNd1Uu3nWGpGOB2XvUzRFJMh7tOuoQLHVPn59PwxOjFKD0WJNE9oNFV/T+Q4VmoUhyYZYz1Q895E/M/rZjq68HMm0kxTQWaLoowjnaBJF6jHJCWajwzBRDJzKyIDLDHRprGyKcGd//IiaZ1V3Vr18r5WqV8XdZTgCI7hFFw4hzrcQgOaQCCHZ3iFN+vJerHerY9ZdMkqZg7gD6zPH+cflNM=</latexit>
log ZX(N, ~) ⇠X
g�0
Fg(tc)~2�2g
<latexit sha1_base64="szLBtrgWm7ruZmiaAiKjCKYejSM=">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</latexit>
~ =1
gsnote that
Corollary: a “volume conjecture”
Explicit calculations show that these spectral traces are very similar to state integrals for hyperbolic three-manifolds (or to
partition functions of 3d susy theories)
~ ! 1
<latexit sha1_base64="a7L3o20/uraKagQuwbUg7dnCw1I=">AAACAHicbVBNS8NAEN3Ur1q/oh48eFksgqeSSEG9Fb14rGA/oAlls900SzebsDtRSujFv+LFgyJe/Rne/Ddu2xy09cHA470ZZuYFqeAaHOfbKq2srq1vlDcrW9s7u3v2/kFbJ5mirEUTkahuQDQTXLIWcBCsmypG4kCwTjC6mfqdB6Y0T+Q9jFPmx2QoecgpASP17SMvCojyFB9GQJRKHrHHZQjjvl11as4MeJm4BamiAs2+/eUNEprFTAIVROue66Tg50QBp4JNKl6mWUroiAxZz1BJYqb9fPbABJ8aZYDDRJmSgGfq74mcxFqP48B0xgQivehNxf+8XgbhpZ9zmWbAJJ0vCjOBIcHTNPCAK0ZBjA0hVHFzK6YRUYSCyaxiQnAXX14m7fOaW69d3dWrjesijjI6RifoDLnoAjXQLWqiFqJogp7RK3qznqwX6936mLeWrGLmEP2B9fkDS4qW4Q==</latexit>
V :
<latexit sha1_base64="n3fyFMcsmkl1iCpKUcf34weXd2Q=">AAAB6XicbVDLSgNBEOyNrxhfUY9eBoPgKeyK4OMU9OIxinlAsoTZSW8yZHZ2mZkVwpI/8OJBEa/+kTf/xkmyB00saCiquunuChLBtXHdb6ewsrq2vlHcLG1t7+zulfcPmjpOFcMGi0Ws2gHVKLjEhuFGYDtRSKNAYCsY3U791hMqzWP5aMYJ+hEdSB5yRo2VHprXvXLFrbozkGXi5aQCOeq98le3H7M0QmmYoFp3PDcxfkaV4UzgpNRNNSaUjegAO5ZKGqH2s9mlE3JilT4JY2VLGjJTf09kNNJ6HAW2M6JmqBe9qfif10lNeOlnXCapQcnmi8JUEBOT6dukzxUyI8aWUKa4vZWwIVWUGRtOyYbgLb68TJpnVe+8enV/Xqnd5HEU4QiO4RQ8uIAa3EEdGsAghGd4hTdn5Lw4787HvLXg5DOH8AfO5w8zwo0q</latexit>
value of the Kahler parameter at the conifold
point
It turns out that the volume conjecture for state integrals [Kashaev, Andersen-Kashaev] has a counterpart in this context:
ZX(N, ~) ⇠ exp (�~V )
<latexit sha1_base64="/ix99AE7v7HF25lQKTWaOCMKLo0=">AAACFnicbVDLSgNBEJz1GeNr1aOXwSAkoGFXBPUmevEkCiYGsyHMTnqzQ2YfzPSKIeQrvPgrXjwo4lW8+TdO4h40WtBQVHXT3eWnUmh0nE9ranpmdm6+sFBcXFpeWbXX1us6yRSHGk9koho+0yBFDDUUKKGRKmCRL+Ha752O/OtbUFok8RX2U2hFrBuLQHCGRmrbuzftRvl8h3qhz1SFelpE1IO71JMQYHl3LNM69ZTohlhp2yWn6oxB/xI3JyWS46Jtf3idhGcRxMgl07rpOim2Bkyh4BKGRS/TkDLeY11oGhqzCHRrMH5rSLeN0qFBokzFSMfqz4kBi7TuR77pjBiGetIbif95zQyDw9ZAxGmGEPPvRUEmKSZ0lBHtCAUcZd8QxpUwt1IeMsU4miSLJgR38uW/pL5XdferR5f7peOTPI4C2SRbpExcckCOyRm5IDXCyT15JM/kxXqwnqxX6+27dcrKZzbIL1jvXyiinYo=</latexit>
N fixed
<latexit sha1_base64="a5YWl8jSYzSUbxIphkwEo9n5UVw=">AAAB+nicbVDJSgNBEO2JW4zbRI9eGoPgQcKMBNRb0IsniWAWSELo6dQkTXoWums0YcynePGgiFe/xJt/Y2c5aOKDgsd7VVTV82IpNDrOt5VZWV1b38hu5ra2d3b37Px+TUeJ4lDlkYxUw2MapAihigIlNGIFLPAk1L3B9cSvP4DSIgrvcRRDO2C9UPiCMzRSx87f0tYpbSEMMfXFELrjjl1wis4UdJm4c1Igc1Q69lerG/EkgBC5ZFo3XSfGdsoUCi5hnGslGmLGB6wHTUNDFoBup9PTx/TYKF3qR8pUiHSq/p5IWaD1KPBMZ8Cwrxe9ifif10zQv2inIowThJDPFvmJpBjRSQ60KxRwlCNDGFfC3Ep5nynG0aSVMyG4iy8vk9pZ0S0VL+9KhfLVPI4sOSRH5IS45JyUyQ2pkCrh5JE8k1fyZj1ZL9a79TFrzVjzmQPyB9bnD58fk6A=</latexit>
In order to obtain the traditional Gromov-Witten free energies, one can instead consider the following limit of the
Fredholm determinant
~ ! 1,µ
~ = t fixed
One has, conjecturally, the asymptotic expansion
log⌅X() ⇠X
g�0
Fg(t)~2�2g
(this asymptotics has however oscillatory corrections)
One striking consequence of this picture is the following. The topological string free energies have a branch cut
structure and are singular at the conifold point. However, in the non-perturbative version, the Fredholm determinant is an
entire function with no singularity!
Fg(t)
stringy moduli space
quantum moduli space
Therefore, branch cuts and singularities are artifacts of the asymptotic expansion (i.e. of perturbation theory)
[cf. Maldacena-Moore-Seiberg-Shih]
Although I have emphasized asymptotic results, we have conjectured an exact expression for the Fredholm
determinant of quantum curves, in terms of (refined) BPS invariants of the toric CY. Roughly,
This provides in principle a complete solution of the spectral problem for these “Weyl-type” operators
⌅X() =X
n2Zexp
0
@X
g�0
Fg(t+ 2⇡i~n)~2g�2 +WKB
1
A
<latexit sha1_base64="x+6LkozOJe58XBluFoVgA24Wrxc=">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</latexit>
Note that this spectral problem is different from the one addressed by Nekrasov and Shatashvili: we quantize curves, not integrable systems. The two problems are identical in
curves of genus one with a 5d susy gauge theory realization; for curves of genus g>1 they are different,
albeit not completely unrelated.
However, our solution of the spectral problem gives non-perturbative corrections to the quantization conditions of
NS
Some applications and extensions
In an independent development, it has been found that tau functions of Painleve functions can be written in terms of 4d instanton partition functions by using the same type of Zak
transform [Gamayun-Iorgov-Lissovvy]
This fits in our framework, after taking a “geometric engineering”/4d limit of the appropriate Calabi-Yau. It leads to
a reinterpretation of the tau function as a spectral determinant [Bonelli-Grassi-Tanzini]
SW/4d limit
⌧ =X
n2Zexp
0
@X
g�0
Fg(a+ 2⇡i~n)~2g�2
1
A
<latexit sha1_base64="1/YS1UlM/vZU3lD/D66gRelm1Fc=">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</latexit>
Complexification
So far we have required to be real and positive, but it is clearly interesting to complexify it.
~
<latexit sha1_base64="+kNMvlgaoM4uks8yWlfwXYhxEYk=">AAAB7XicbVBNSwMxEJ3Ur1q/qh69BIvgqexKQb0VvXisYD+gXUo2zbax2WRJskJZ+h+8eFDEq//Hm//GtN2Dtj4YeLw3w8y8MBHcWM/7RoW19Y3NreJ2aWd3b/+gfHjUMirVlDWpEkp3QmKY4JI1LbeCdRLNSBwK1g7HtzO//cS04Uo+2EnCgpgMJY84JdZJrd4oJBr3yxWv6s2BV4mfkwrkaPTLX72BomnMpKWCGNP1vcQGGdGWU8GmpV5qWELomAxZ11FJYmaCbH7tFJ85ZYAjpV1Ji+fq74mMxMZM4tB1xsSOzLI3E//zuqmNroKMyyS1TNLFoigV2Co8ex0PuGbUiokjhGrubsV0RDSh1gVUciH4yy+vktZF1a9Vr+9rlfpNHkcRTuAUzsGHS6jDHTSgCRQe4Rle4Q0p9ILe0ceitYDymWP4A/T5AyCnjts=</latexit>
It turns out that the integral kernel of can be computedexplicitly in many cases [Kashaev-M.M.] . It involves Faddeev’s
quantum dilogarithm
⇢X
<latexit sha1_base64="mVY82xxWcppky61GB+n5m3IyGww=">AAAB7XicbVBNSwMxEJ3Ur1q/qh69BIvgqexKQb0VvXisYD+gXUo2zbax2WRJskJZ+h+8eFDEq//Hm//GtN2Dtj4YeLw3w8y8MBHcWM/7RoW19Y3NreJ2aWd3b/+gfHjUMirVlDWpEkp3QmKY4JI1LbeCdRLNSBwK1g7HtzO//cS04Uo+2EnCgpgMJY84JdZJrZ4eqX6nX654VW8OvEr8nFQgR6Nf/uoNFE1jJi0VxJiu7yU2yIi2nAo2LfVSwxJCx2TIuo5KEjMTZPNrp/jMKQMcKe1KWjxXf09kJDZmEoeuMyZ2ZJa9mfif101tdBVkXCapZZIuFkWpwFbh2et4wDWjVkwcIVRzdyumI6IJtS6gkgvBX355lbQuqn6ten1fq9Rv8jiKcAKncA4+XEId7qABTaDwCM/wCm9IoRf0jj4WrQWUzxzDH6DPH4Z2jx4=</latexit>
�b(x)
<latexit sha1_base64="nbAaY4a0tR9EOJRHj2W5Fzc85Wk=">AAACDHicbVDLSsNAFJ3UV62vqks3g0Wom5JIQd0V3bisYB/QhDKZTtqhk5kwMxFLyAe48VfcuFDErR/gzr9xkmahrQcuHM65l3vv8SNGlbbtb6u0srq2vlHerGxt7+zuVfcPukrEEpMOFkzIvo8UYZSTjqaakX4kCQp9Rnr+9Drze/dEKir4nZ5FxAvRmNOAYqSNNKzWXBERibSQHIUkcdsTmg4TN0R6ooLET9P6w6npsht2DrhMnILUQIH2sPrljgSOQ8I1ZkipgWNH2kuQ1BQzklbcWJEI4Skak4Gh2WblJfkzKTwxyggGQpriGubq74kEhUrNQt905lcuepn4nzeIdXDhJZRHsSYczxcFMYNawCwZOKKSYM1mhiAsqbkV4gmSCGuTX8WE4Cy+vEy6Zw2n2bi8bdZaV0UcZXAEjkEdOOActMANaIMOwOARPINX8GY9WS/Wu/Uxby1Zxcwh+APr8wcchpxM</latexit>
b2 / ~
<latexit sha1_base64="Aemvlx29VL2qxenK+nwmJkoUtzE=">AAACBHicbVDLSgMxFM3UV62vUZfdBIvgqsyUgrorunFZwT6gU0smzbShmSQkGaEMXbjxV9y4UMStH+HOvzGdzkJbDwQO59xL7jmhZFQbz/t2CmvrG5tbxe3Szu7e/oF7eNTWIlGYtLBgQnVDpAmjnLQMNYx0pSIoDhnphJPrud95IEpTwe/MVJJ+jEacRhQjY6WBWw5iZMY6SsPZfQ0GUglpBAzGIVJw4Fa8qpcBrhI/JxWQozlwv4KhwElMuMEMad3zPWn6KVKGYkZmpSDRRCI8QSPSs5SjmOh+moWYwVOrDGEklH3cwEz9vZGiWOtpHNrJ7ORlby7+5/USE130U8plYgjHi4+ihEGbc94IHFJFsGFTSxBW1N4K8RgphI3trWRL8Jcjr5J2rerXq5e39UrjKq+jCMrgBJwBH5yDBrgBTdACGDyCZ/AK3pwn58V5dz4WowUn3zkGf+B8/gBUx5fn</latexit>
which can be analytically continued to the complex plane. This makes it possible to reformulate topological string partition functions in the language of (double) q-series,
study their resurgent properties in the complex plane, and so on [in progress with Jie Gu].
~
<latexit sha1_base64="+kNMvlgaoM4uks8yWlfwXYhxEYk=">AAAB7XicbVBNSwMxEJ3Ur1q/qh69BIvgqexKQb0VvXisYD+gXUo2zbax2WRJskJZ+h+8eFDEq//Hm//GtN2Dtj4YeLw3w8y8MBHcWM/7RoW19Y3NreJ2aWd3b/+gfHjUMirVlDWpEkp3QmKY4JI1LbeCdRLNSBwK1g7HtzO//cS04Uo+2EnCgpgMJY84JdZJrd4oJBr3yxWv6s2BV4mfkwrkaPTLX72BomnMpKWCGNP1vcQGGdGWU8GmpV5qWELomAxZ11FJYmaCbH7tFJ85ZYAjpV1Ji+fq74mMxMZM4tB1xsSOzLI3E//zuqmNroKMyyS1TNLFoigV2Co8ex0PuGbUiokjhGrubsV0RDSh1gVUciH4yy+vktZF1a9Vr+9rlfpNHkcRTuAUzsGHS6jDHTSgCRQe4Rle4Q0p9ILe0ceitYDymWP4A/T5AyCnjts=</latexit>
Open problems
I have presented a precise “duality” between (conventional) topological strings and the spectral theory of trace class operators. This provides a non-perturbative definition of
topological strings (in the spirit of AdS/CFT) and has many implications in both fields.
What is lacking is a more physical understanding of this duality. Formally, it suggests a deep relationship with a 3d
SUSY theory, or with one-dimensional fermions, but this has not been made more concrete
Mathematically, most of our conjectures are unambiguous and well-defined, but probably very hard to prove (it also
seems to be difficult to find mathematicians who know well both sides of the conjectures, i.e. spectral theory and
Gromov-Witten theory!)
Thank you for your attention!