The USS Liberty

8/7/2019 The USS Liberty

1/13

USS Liberty

The USS Liberty is easily a false flag operation. It's a part of American history. Somebelieve that it's an accident and others don't. The incident is a part of the complexhistory of the Middle East. Middle Eastern history for thousands of years have beenmarked with wars, triumphs, ethnic disputes, imperialism, Crusades, and otherfacets of the human experience. Its certainly a great motto to allow the history of theMiddle East to rely upon as a motivating means to have cooperation & mutualrespect for all peoples in desiring a more perfect Earth.

David Ben Gurion developed the Israeli Terrorist Cell called Unit 131. Back in the 1950's,America was an ally with Egyptian President Gamal Adbel Nasser. Ben Gurion believed that


2/13

Egypt would attack Israel and he was against the U.S./Egypt alliance. So, the Israeli governmenttried to use young Israelis disguised as terrorists to implicate another nation of terrorism. Theseprinciples would be a part of Operation Cyanide that tried to use the U.S.S. Liberty to attempt toinitiate WWIII. Something happened in May 23, 1967. There were instructions from the DeputySecretary of Defense Cyrus R. Vance to the Liberty commander William L. McGonagle to sendthe ship to the eastern Mediterranean via Rota, Spain. People thought it would put sailors in risk.Frank Raven or the G Group Chief resisted such a risky move, The ship will be defenseless outthere. If war breaks out, shell be alone and vulnerable. Either side might start shooting at herIsay the ship should be left where it is. Army General Lyman L. Lemnitzer of Northwoods putAdmiral John S. McCain (or the father of John McCain) to be in charge of the USS Liberty.McCain Sr. was the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Navy in Europe in that time. U.S. Secretaryof Defense Robert McNamara per President Johnson's instructions made Admiral McCain into afour star commanding position by February 1967. McCain Sr. made his operations known fromhis office in London. PresidentLyndon BainesJohnson wanted support and tried to reopenthe Straits of Tiran that was previously closed to Israel by Egypt. Israel was by that timecreating its nuclear program in the Negev desert. Israel wanted more military assistance from theWest. These materials included 100 Hawk missiles, 140 Patton tanks, and 24 Skyhawk Jets.

Ironically, President John F. Kennedy opposed Israel developing nuclearweapons, because Kennedy desired a peaceful end to the Cold War

(without nuclear agitation or nuclear provocation). Lyndon Johnson had manyIsraeli supporters like John P. Roche and Mathilde Krim. Roche wrote Johnson's speech on theStraits of Tiran back in May of 1967. Krim's first husband was David Danon. He was fromBulgaria and was a part of the Irgun (that done terrorist acts before). Mathilde was a gun runnerfor the Irgun that was headed by Menachem Begin even before 1948. She was friends with theterrorist group Stern Gang (it was created by Avraham Stern and headed by Yitzhah Shamir). InJune 3, 1967, the USS Liberty traveled in international waters off the coast of the Gaza Strip. Theship wanted to use independent surveillance of the eastern Mediterranean. Israel attacked Egyptover land and fear of an Egyptian attack in 1967. In 1982, Menachem Begin, then Israel'sPrime Minister admitted that: "...The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinaiapproaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honestwith ourselves. We decided to attack him..." The Israeli attack was still premeditated andpreemptive. Mordechai Bentov was a part of the Israeli cabinet. He admitted that the threat ofextermination was used as an invention to justify the annexation of new Arab territories. Somesuspect that Johnson had an affair with the blonde Mathilde Krim. Krim passed documents fromIsrael to Johnson. Many people thought that Egypt started the war, but it didn't. Abba Eban,Israeli's foreign Minister, told the U.S. Ambassador Walworth Barbour that they were going to theU.N. Security Council to protest Egypt's actions when Egypt didn't start the war. Yitzhak Rabinwas the former Chief of Staff and then Ambassador of the U.S. He admitted that Nasser didn'twant a war. The USS Liberty watched the Israeli Six Day War with Egypt (or the United ArabRepublic). Operation Cyanide was an Israeli program that desired to war against Egypt anddepose the nationalist Gamal Adbul Nasser. The elite really hate or dislike nationalists. U.S.intelligence and military specialists were sent to Israel months before to plan and prepare for theoperation. Some believe that the operation allowed the USS Liberty to be sunk. The ship hadsensitive equipment. On June 8, 1967, Israeli Navy and Air Force attacked the US ship USSLiberty with torpedoes, rockets, white phosphorous, cannons, and armor-piercing bullets. Thisoccurred without reason and without warning. The Israelis used napalm or a flammable liquid or

jellied gasoline. Liberty's deck was a 3,000 degree firestorm. 34 Americans were killed and 171people were wounded (one person died from the wounds). Napalm is meant to kill and maim. It'sused to cause panic and create confusion.

The first wave of attacks had as high as 8 planes using heat seeking missiles. It destroyed all ofthe transformers except one that fed the aerial system. This attack was well planned and somecall it a premeditated strike in order to prevent the USS Liberty to tell the world of this murderousattack. The surveillance ship could no long listen to the war or send messages. The other motiveof the attack according to people was to kill the crew and send the ship into the bottom of the


3/13

ocean. There were 3 surface craft that fired torpedoes not just planes attacking the USS Liberty.One missile hit below the water line and made a hole. This hole was measured in 45 feet by 34by 37. The ship didn't sink and it was listed 11 degrees. The torpedo boats even destroyedthose lifeboats that were inflated. The Six Day War war ended in June 8 and Egypt lost. The crewon Liberty first thought that Arabic people in unmarked planes and ship attacked the ship inretaliation for the U.S. support of Israel. Moshe Dayan was one of the leaders directing the attack.294 people survived it. The remains of 5 men were never found and body parts were put intosacks for burial. Vice Admiral William I. Martin was a former WWII test pilot and a Pentagonloyalist. He was in command of the Sixth Fleet in April of 1967. There were many U.S. ships inthe area during Israel's assault. They include the Saratoga (being commanded by CaptainJoseph Tully), the Flagship (that was commanded by Rear Admiral Roger Payne), the USSAmerica (This was the new carrier that was under the command by Captain Don Engen.The Sixth Fleet Carrier Division Commander was Rear Admiral Lawrence Geis), etc.Reports existed of a dozen of escorting destroyer ships. The Saratoga's Communications Officergot a message from the Liberty. It was addressed to all U.S. ships or stations. The message read:"...Liberty is under attack by unknown enemy air and surface units. Request Assistance." Helponly came in about 15 to 20 minutes away from the Liberty. Captain Tully notified Vice AdmiralMartin that unless directed otherwise, he planned to launch a Ready Strike group in support ofLiberty. Martin approved and directed the USS America to launch their Ready Strike Group. Yet,Rear Admiral Geis of the USS America recalled his aircraft. This caused a problem for Captain

Tully. Vice Admiral ordered another strike to give aid to the Liberty, but this was against recalledby Rear Admiral Gies. An independent, unofficial study found that:

"...The White House deliberately prevented the U.S. Navy from coming to the defense of USSLibertyby recalling Sixth Fleet military rescue support while the ship was under attack(Findings of the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Israeli Attack on USS Liberty, theRecall of Military Rescue Support Aircraft while the Ship was Under Attack, and the SubsequentCover-up by the United States Government, Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C., October 22, 2003).Heres other sources on this occurrence:

During the 1967 Six-Day War between Israel and Egypt, the U.S. electronic andintelligence research vessel Liberty was cruising in international waters in theMediterranean [Sea] and was suddenly attacked by Israeli torpedo boats and jet aircraft.

The attack, which lasted almost two hours, killed 34 American sailors and wounded 171.AU.S. naval court of inquiry found that the Liberty was, without question, ininternational waters; the weather was clear; the ships identity plainly marked and theU.S. flag waving in the wind. - Andrew Hurley in his book, One Nation Under Israel

Twenty-six years have passed since that clear day on June 8, 1967 when Israel attackedthe USS Liberty with aircraft and torpedo boats, killing 34 young men and wounding 171.The attack in international waters followed overnine hours of close surveillance. Israeli

pilots circled the ship at low level [i.e., at low altitudes] 13 times BEFORE attacking.Radio operators in Spain, Lebanon, Germany, and aboard the ship itself all heard the[Israeli]pilots reporting to their headquarters that this was anAmerican ship. Theyattacked anyway. And when the ship failed to sink, the Israeli government concocted an

elaborate story to cover the crime.

- James M. Ennes Jr., author of the bookAssault on the Liberty(Random House, 1980).James Ennes was serving as a lieutenant on the bridge of the USS Liberty on the day of theattack.


4/13

There is still a banking elite that wants centralized control over human endeavors. Carrol J.Quigley - Professor of International Affairs at Georgetown University, BillClinton's mentor. The Anglo-American Establishment wrote in hisTragedy andHope book from 1966 that:

"There is... an inner core of intimate associates who unquestionably knewthat they were members of a group devoted to a common purpose and an

outer circle of a larger number on whom the inner circle acted by personalpersuasion, patronage distribution, and social pressure. It is probable thatmost members of the outer circle were not conscious that they were beingused by a secret society."

"Their aim is nothing less than to create a world system of financial controlin private hands able to dominate the political system of each country andthe economy of the world as a whole."

Now, McNamara recalled the aircraft that has been sent from the Saratoga within minutes.Johnson had to order this to occur. Secretary McNamara ordered the aircraft recalled a second

time. Admiral Geis was told by President Lyndon Baines Johnson that the aircraft ought to bereturned. LBJ didn't want Israel to be embarrassed as an ally and he didn't care who was killed orwhat was done to the ship. LBJ is known for his use of profanity and ruthlessness. AccordingGeis, Johnson told him that: "....I want that godd___ ship going to the bottom. No help recall thewings. (USS Liberty White House-sanctioned attack, June 8, 1967 Excerpt from the video,Terror storm by Alex Jones). Tony Hart was a Navy communication technician stationed at theU.S. Navy base in Morocco. In June 1967, Hart reported that McNamara didn't want to go to warover dead sailors, which is disrespectful. As the USS Liberty had sunk, Johnson wanted Egypt tobe blamed. Even the McCains and government officials were silent on the Liberty assault. Theattack ended in ca. 3:15 pm. Later, Israeli helicopters circled the ship. Some of the crewmembers,not yet realizing that Israel was the perpetrator of the attack, were glad to see their friendly ally.Then one crewmember shouted, Theyve come to finish us off. The copters watched and flewaway while U.S. rescue planes had a lack of response. There were 851 rocket hits and at least 15planes had targeted the USS Liberty. Some have called this beyond an accident. Captain Ward

was the chief Navy attorney for the 1967 U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry. He believed that the USSLiberty was marked as a US ship. Captain Boston believed that the attack was deliberate. TheU.S. Navy once prohibited its investigators from going to Israel to question Israeli pilots and boat

captains. Yitzhak Rabin, the fifth Prime Minister of Israel, believed that Israelwas not to blame for the attack on the USS Liberty but said, In any event,to express our goodwill and humanitarian concern, the Israeli Governmentpaid $13 million in compensation to the families of the Americans killed orwounded in the attack. (Operation Cyanide, p. 65). So, the lesson here is that


5/13

we should not promote hatred against any people whether they are Jews or Arabs.

On the other hand, no nation is perfect and every nation should own up to its

errors. I believe that both Israel and her Arab neighbors have a right to exist in

peace. I do, however, believe that evil deeds whether done by Israelis, Arabs,

Russians, Chinese, or even Americans need to be exposed. In America, we

should have infrastructure development. Investments have done huge dividendslike high speed rail, and other services. Italy, China, and other nations have these

high speed rail systems, Maglev trains, and other 21st

century transportation

devices. That is why in America, I do endorse investments in high tech

infrastructure development in rails, etc. The USS Liberty attack was an error that

the Israelis did in the past indeed. Many wish for men like Dr. King and RFK to exist

now, but even they would realize that this cant be. We cant be like other great men or

great women. They would want us to be ourselves and present to the world our unique

talent and our strong fervor for equality, liberty, and real human freedom. The

treatment of another person ought to be same as we would desire to be treated. For

the goals of human liberation from oppression isnt limited to one background,but its part and parcel of the real agenda that exists from all of the humanrace. Violence, bigotry, and faulty stereotypes should be crushed since ahuman being is a human being.There are calls for us to be middle of the road or

post-partisan. One answer to that futile, non-efficient calling is the following. Have the

great politicians, theologians, engineers, architects, soldiers, athletes, other scholars,

and other contributors to civilizations would of done of what they have achieved by

being moderate (or lukewarm)? The answer is of course, No. A moderate persuasion or

mentality has never lead into real reforms in society. Real reforms have been instituted

as a result of radical policies, radical protests, and radical calls for real proposals to

enrich people. It took the radical acts of abolitionists and the Civil War to banish slavery.

It took radical protests and other radical actions to crush Jim Crow segregation. Being

lukewarm ought to never be a goal of a person. Being legendary, being outside of the

box, and being inspirational are great aims to subscribe and aspire to. All peoplesdespite our differences politically & socially ought to wish any human beingtrue happiness and a life filled with a just, righteous purpose. Truth, honor, and

dignity are more important than swagger, materialism, or bluster. On the other hand,

there is nothing wrong with us expressing our unique style or flavor to the world.

Having flavor is cool. An incorrect philosophy for anyone to embrace though is to

assume that your flavor makes you better than someone else (in order to try to

intimidate another human being in the realm of extreme materialism). We have the

right to express creativity and be creative among the composition of our entirepersonality or repertoire. We can be great and legendary in our own communities to

sustain that peace, tranquility, and inspiration for our fellow people.


6/13

Appendix A: Summary of Oil History

Oil control is a way that the Anglo-American establishment uses to financially dominatemost of the world. Even F. William Engdahl mentions this reality in his book entitled,"A Century of War." Oil is such a powerful resource that controlling it will mean thatyou can control global economies. Henry Ford and Rudolf Diesel (or the inventor of thediesel engine) intended cars to not use gasoline ironically. Henry Ford told a New YorkTimes reporter that ethyl alcohol was the fuel of the future in 1925. Ethyl alcohol relatesto ethanol today. Henry Fords first Model T was built to run on hemp gasoline and the


7/13

car itself was constructed from Hemp. Ford was photographed among his hemp fields.The car used fuel from the soil. Rudolf Diesel used the diesel engine to run on vegetableand seed oils like hemp. He ran his engine on peanut oil for the 1900 Worlds Fair. As analternative to methanol, hemp has at least one glowing report: the plant produces up tofour times more cellulose per acre than trees. And a hemp crop grows a little quicker

than a forest. Hemp is renewable as well. Hemp is biodegradable, so oil spills involvinghemp become solely about just fertilizer not eco-catastrophes (like the 2010 oil spillrecently). Hemp fuel doesnt contribute to sulfur dioxide air poisoning either. Biodiesel

can cut emissions like carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. Petroleum interestslaunched smear campaigns to have an oil monopoly in the world. This campaignprevented agricultural systems to have a radical usage of hemp. Even in 1925, somepeople wanted to promote alternatives to gasoline additives. The feds banned thecultivation of hemp in the 1930s.

Back in 1928, oil cartels signed an agreement called Achancarry Agreement (being signedin Achnacarry, Scotland). The deal was that the cartels divided the oil resources of the

world and markets between 7 major British and American controlled cartels. This hasbeen called the Seven Sisters. Their names are Esso (Standard Oil of New Jersey, nowExxon), Mobil (Standard Oil of New York), Gulf Oil, Texaco, Standard Oil ofCalifornia (Chevron), Royal Dutch Shell, and the Anglo-Persian Oil Company(British Petroleum). Enghahl wrote about this incident. He wrote that the SevenSisters acted as one unit and that: "...British and American oil majors agreed toaccept the existing market divisions and shares, to set a secret world cartel price,

and end the destructive competition and price wars of the last decade." This causedthe hegemonic Anglo-American empire to control most of the world's oil reserves. Theyuse ruthlessness to maintain that power as documented by Engdahl. After WWII, theBretton Wood conference made the American dollar the world's functional currency

pegged to gold at 35 dollar an ounce. Later, the IMF, the World Bank, and the GeneralAgreement on Tariffs and Trade or GATT was created. The WTO came from GATT. The U.S. Federal Reserve controlled of economic system in America (it's a privateenterprise not being federal with no reserves. It's owned and controlled by New Yorkbanks. These banks are link with the major American oil cartels). After WWII, theRockefeller elitists ruled major oil companies like many Standard Oil franchises andMobil Oil (including Chase Manhattan Bank, National City Bank, Chemical Bank, theBank of New York, Kuhn-Loeb, and others). According to Engdahl, 10 percent of theaid from the Marshall Plan (to rebuild European infrastructure) was used to buy American oil. By 1947, the fiver American oil companies supplied half of WesternEurope's oil. Big oil used its monopoly power to double the price of oil from 1945 to1948.This was done to allow European countries to use the Marshall Plan to aidEuropean oil refining capacity. The U.S. and the West want to control the rapidmodernization and industrialization of the Third World especially. They become lessdependent on American dollar. So, Nixon in August 15, 1971 ended dollarconvertibility into gold. The world finance system was into a dollar standard withno gold backing. Foreign holders of U.S. dollars could no longer redeem theirpaper for U.S. gold reserves. Yet, the dollar kept devaluing.


8/13

By February of 1973, the dollar was again devalued by 10% and the Fed's price for goldwas set at $42.22/ounce. This action was also ineffective, and by the end of March the value of the US dollar had plummeted around the world, dropping 40% against the

German Deutschmark. However, the Anglo-American financial establishment had anAce up its sleeve, a card that was first revealed in May of 1973 at the Bilderberg meetingheld at Saltsjoebaden, Sweden. Engdahl wrote that this meeting was about theBilderbergers to want to trigger a global oil embargo in the world (to increase the world'soil prices, strop radically industrial growth in the world, and tilt the power to the Anglo-American financial interests). The Bilderberg meeting wanted the flood of oil dollars.

From 1949 to 1970, the price of oil (influenced by OPEC from the early 1960's) wasabout $1.90/barrel. It gradually increased from 1970 to 1973. In early 1973, it jumpedinto $3.01. This massive price hike was then dwarfed on January 1, 1974, when OPECraised the price of oil by more than 100% to $11.65/barrel. Overall, from early 1973 to

January of 1974 the price of oil jumped over 400%. Nixon didn't know what happenedor what to do. The mostly Sunni Saudi Arabian nation allied with Anglo-American bankstoo. Later, petro dollars (or an oil standard) came to replace the gold standard. ManyThird World nations didn't have enough oil resources to compensate the rapid oil priceincreases. So, they depended on the World Bank and other institutions to pay debts orother policies (like the West offering them petrodollars). The catch is that thesepetrodollars were used to refinance deficits not create new infrastructure, agriculture, orimprove the world's standard of living. As CFR and New York attorney admitted, he wanted: ".... A degree of 'controlled dis-integration' in the world economy is alegitimate objective for the 1980s..." This is what occurred. Worldwide by the1980's, the traditional industrial and agriculture development was either

disintegrated or under mostly corporate hands.


9/13

*On a side note: A Bilderberg owned publication called the Economist admitted thatpowerful globocrat elites are ruling much of the geo-political systems in the world(beyond a conspiracy). So, the agenda for global centralized control system is in public

and out in the open. The push for centralized world government control system as anopen conspiracy. There are groups that promote this ideology. The groups promotingthis agenda are the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and the CFR (theyshape the politicians and power brokers that they have bought in numerouscircumstances). The Economist admits that the cosmopolitan elite do indeedflock together at such gatherings and elusive clubs to shape the world that thesuperclass wishes to inhabit. It's assumed that the open conspiracy is flauntedby the established. Its editor is a regular attendee in the annual Bilderbergconference. This is an admission that the piece proudly discloses in its openingparagraphs. The Bilderberg group in real life does influence world policy and actsas a conspiracy to promote that globalization agenda. Its members and proponents

were instrumental in creating the single European currency. It hosts the world's mostinfluential business people plus aristocrats (including a small group of journalists). Itrepresents the biggest global media corporations and its sworn to comply with theChathan House rules (that means that can't disclose any of the big ideas that are hatchedat Bilderberg).The world is a complicated place, with oceans of new information sloshing around. thepiece continues, To run a multinational organisation, it helps if you have a rough idea ofwhat is going on. It also helps to be on first-name terms with other globocrats. So the


10/13

cosmopolitan eliteinternational financiers, bureaucrats, charity bosses and thinkersconstantly meet and talk. They flock to elite gatherings They form clubs. One suchclub is the Bilderberg Group. The Pilgrim Society is more secret and more powerful thanthe Bilderbergers today. Under the Bilderbergers are the groups by the names of theCouncil on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, The Carnegie Endowment for

International Peace and The Group of Thirty. Many people are exposing their plans andtheir influence. The Economist quotes how these international events shaped policiesinvolving diplomatic agreements and even decisions on major wars. The Economistquotesformer Kissinger luminary and international elitist David Rothkopf, the author of thebookThe Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making. What they offer isaccess to some of the worlds most sequestered and elusive leaders. As such, they areone of the informal mechanisms of [global] power, Rothkopf adds. The Economistmagazine acts slick and tries not to blame the globocrat elites for the financial crisis, butthat they or the super class were just caught napping. They still admit that theseinternational bankers have been caught looting the system wholesale. It tries to convincereaders that ultimately the presence of an inter-connected international elite actually

saved the world from complete financial meltdown so you can sleep easy at night. Theyomit that the international financial crisis was carefully massaged back in 2006. Reportsfrom the Bilderberg meetings in Canada in 06 and in Turkey in 07 predicted a globalhousing crash and forecast a prolonged financial meltdown as a result. The group hassince been debating exactly how it should move to shape the economic situation in orderto further its own global influence and that of the (honestly, were not evil at all) superclass." A decade ago, people were called extreme for just mentioning the fact theBilderberg was a major manipulator of world events. Now, these views are admitted ineditorials of the world's mainstream press engines.


11/13

Appendix B: The Egyptian Revolution of 2011

Revolution is in the air from Tunisia, Jordan, and now in Egypt. Mohamed El Baradei isthe globalist pied piper of the Egyptian revolt. Many protesters sincerely want to freefrom the dictator Hosni Mubarak. The revolt is heavily composed of an organicallydriven people. Egypt is controlled now heavily by the U.S. military industrial complex.One threat now is that hopefully a NGO/globalist funded person like El Baradei won'ttake over Egypt if the autocrat Mubarak leaves office after almost 30 years. Under

Mubarak, the country gets some $2 billion in aid from America, 2nd only to Israel in theMiddle East. Most of that money is spend on Egypt's military not to the people ofEgypt. Egypt pays out $1.1 million annually to the Podesta Group, which is a left gate-keeping organization that's closely tied to the Obama administration (some say this isacting as foreign agents for Mubarak's regime). Mubarack has loyalty to the U.S. Empire.Vice President Joe Biden said that Mubarak's unbroken 30 year reign didn't represent adictatorship and that he was a close ally of the West. That isn't true of course. Egyptunder Mubarak uses its billions in U.S. military aid to detain, beat and torture dissenters,opposition politicians and journalists; many have died in custody, writes MarkZepezauer. Thousands of political prisoners and pro-democracy activists are held inovercrowded, disease-ridden prisons, without charges or trials. Press restrictions,

including newspaper shutdowns, are widespread. This grassroots movement amongindividual people is different from the staged color revolution in Georgia, the Ukraine,or Yugoslavia (when those events were orchestrated events disguised as spontaneousuprisings intended to remove rogue leaders hostile to the global elite's agenda for worldgovernment). The recent Egyptian revolt was started by young Egyptians that are tired oftheir freedoms being violated. Some folks are trying to co-opt this movement (by thesame elite people that pulled Mubarak's strings for decades) that is occurring in thestreets of Cairo, Alexandria, Suez, and other places. The U.S. knew that Egypt's regime


12/13

was bound to collapse for 3 years. The Telegraph said that the American Embassytrained rebel leaders to try to infiltrate opposition groups from the very beginning. Oneinfiltrator is the top UN official and staunch Mubarak adversary Mohamed El Baradei.He went into Cairo to attempt to lead the protest movement. El Baradei serves on theBoard of Trustees of the International Crisis Group (or the ICG). The ICG issued a

press statement protesting the house arrest of El Baradei. The ICG is a slick, NGO (ornon-governmental organization) that has an annual budget of over $15 million. It'sbankrolled by folks in the Carnegie, Ford and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations.George Soros' Open Society Institute funds the ICG too. Soros serves as a member ofthe organizations Executive Committee. This is a major geopolitical steering group ofthe global elite (especially among Left Gatekeepers). El Baradei might be a new man tohead the post-Mubarak government.

Those protesting Mubarak shouldn't fall for a NGO front man. Mubarak knows that histime with the power elite may be short by remarking during a national address Saturdaythat the protests were part of a bigger plot to shake the stability and destroy the

legitimacy of the political system. Zbigniew Brzezinski is a globalist on the board of theInternational Crisis Group. He warned last year that the international hierarchy wasexperiencing rebellion from a global awakening that would be led by young radicals inthird world nations. He admitted that much of the world is awakening about issues aboutglobalization, the new world order, and problems with the oppression against theinterests of the common people (especially in the parameters of the Third World).Brzezinski predicted the wave of revolt now and it's spreading like wildfire in the globe.Brzezinski and his fellow globalists want to pick up the pieces in order to continue thestatus quo. While the people, who risked their lives for real change, could be victims of amonumental deception. If the Egyptians topple Mubarak to replace him with ElBaradei, they will have achieved nothing (to make Egypt to exist as a subservient

client state of the U.S. military industrial complex). If the Egyptians wish Egypt tobe an independent nation (and then achieve this goal), then it can be a great event inhistory. The protesters destroying Egyptian artifacts are wrong and these protestersironically aren't the originators of the Egyptian nation to put it bluntly. So, real reformsand real liberty ought to manifest itself inside of Egypt. Many pro-Mubarak forces aretrying to stir violence in order to maintain the dictator Mubarak into power (some ofplain clothes police officers). Some pro-Mubarak forces have assaulted journalists too(from America, the Arabic world, from the UK, etc. Many pro-Mubarak forces havetried to infiltrate protestors in order to attempt to make sincere dissenters to the currentregime as the sole initiators of the violence in Egypt). They or the pro-status quo forceswant to hunt journalists since journalists are exposing the corruption of Hosni Mubarak.

One person named Shahira Amin (a female reporter) resigned from Nile TV for thepresent Egyptian government acting too heavy handed in restricting the news coveragein the Nile TV network. Sooner or later, Mubarak's reign will end. The time table forradical changes in the Middle East is more complicated since the Middle Eastern mindremembers events spanning centuries. The administration is balancing the need to play itcool and desiring a regime change in Egypt. Hopefully, real liberty will reign in Egypt.

By Timothy


13/13

Documents

The USS Liberty