Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IHP
Im T
echnologiepark 2515236 F
rankfurt (Oder)
Germ
any
!
"""#%$ & #
'(( $) && *
Different S
piral Inductor
Layouts-T
heir Influence on Q
, fSR and S
pice Param
eters
Erzgräber, H
eide
!
"""#%$ & #
'(( $) && *
Optim
um design of spiral inductors w
ith respect to
• M
aximum
Quality F
actor Q
• M
inimum
area consumption (A
sp)
• S
ufficiently high self-resonant frequency (fS
R )
Motivation
!
"""#%$ & #
'(( $) && *
One spiral
Do = 410 µm
Tw
o conv. stacked spirals
D
o = 325 µmA
new stacked spiral w
inding doubles fS
R.
0.00.4
0.81.2
0 1 2 3 4
ρρρ ρS
i = 15 ΩΩΩ Ωcm
L = 92 - 95 nHnorm
al isolation
newstacked
conv.stacked
onespiral
Quality Factor
Frequency (G
Hz)
Quality F
actor versus Frequency
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
Cox2
Cox1
RS
i2C
Si2
CS
i1
CS
RS
LS
RS
i1
•••
•
RLC
Loop 2
RLC
Loop 1
• Typical w
inding:
Lines in close proximity are nearly
equipotential !
CS is sm
all
• RLC
loop 1 is dominant
fSR = f (layout, technology)
• Winding w
ith strongly increased C
s or spiral on
insulating substrates C
S = C
iw + C
cross C
iw = f( lsp, tM , 1/S
, W)
Ccross = f(W
, Wup , N
, tIsp-up )
• RLC
loop 2 is
dominant
fS
R = f(layout, tM , tIsp
-up )
Silicon technology:
two
RLC
loops determine f
SR
.
Cox2
Cox1
RS
i2C
Si2
CS
i1
CS
RS
LS
RS
i1
•••
•
Lumped E
lement C
ircuit Model
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
123
4
1234
Ciw
CM
IM
Conventional stacked w
inding:increased ac potential
differencesN
ew stacked w
inding:sm
all ac potential differences
InOut
12
34
56
M3
M2
M1
S
InOut
12
45
6
Given by
technology
Spacing
chosen bylayout
CM
IM
Ciw
Stacked S
pirals
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
Quality F
actor versus Frequency
01
23
45
67
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
L = 15 nH
ABC
Quality Factor
Frequency (G
Hz)
Type of
Spiral W
indingfS
R
(GH
z)Q
(2 GH
z)(conv. Q
-extraction)
A2 spirals inseriesconvent.w
inding
2.120.31
B2 spirals inseriesneww
inding
5.455.94
C1 spiral
6.76.3
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
Tw
o Spirals
in Series
- Conventional W
inding
01
23
4
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
Frequency (G
Hz)
Mag Y11
-90
-60
-30
0 30 60 90
2 spirals in series
fSR
L06 (15 nH)
Port 2
Port 1
Ang Y11
• Conventional w
inding:
Large capacitance between
the stacked spirals
Cs = 218
fF
• Low self-resonant frequency
• Sm
all influence of substrate
resistance - Cs is dom
inant !
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
Conventional Inductor
- Only one S
piral
02
46
810
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Frequency (G
Hz)
Mag Y11
-90
-60
-30
0 30 60 90
1 spiral in metal 4
L05st (15 nH)
Port 2
Port 1
Ang Y11
• Higher self- resonant frequency
Cs only 15.4
fF
• Increased spiral area (70 %)
• No sym
metry for P
orts1 and 2
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
Inductor w
ith N
ew T
ype of S
pirals in Series
02
46
8
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Frequency (G
Hz)
Mag Y11, Y22
-90
-60
-30
0 30 60 90
2 spirals in series
L05 (15 nH)
Port 2
Port 1
Ang Y11, Y22
• Decreased capacitance betw
een
the two stacked spirals:
Cs only 42
fF
fS
R about doubled
• Nearly sym
metry betw
een both
ports
• Asp decreased by 40 %
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
Tw
o Spirals
in Series - Influence
of Substrate D
oping
02
46
0 2 4 6L = 15 nH
Type B
Type A
p+ S
i (0.01 ΩΩΩ Ωcm
)
p- S
i and p+ epi-S
i
p- S
i (50 ΩΩΩ Ωcm
)
p+ S
i
p- S
i and p+ epi S
i
p- S
i
Quality Factor
Frequency (G
Hz)
Type A
winding :
Cs is dom
inant -substrate doping hasonly sm
all influence.
Type B
winding:
Cs is sm
all -now
fSR is a strong
function of substratedoping.
tox : 3.3 µm
upper spiral:
tM4 : 2 µm
lower spiral:
tM3 + tM
2 : 1.2 µm
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
S
umm
ary and Conclusions
• P
arasitics, depending on the type of spiral winding, reduce
fSR ,
lim
it the operating frequency and the capacitive load.
• W
e propose to improve
fSR by m
inimizing the ac potential
differences between lines in close proxim
ity.
• Based on this principle
a new w
inding for stacked spirals is investigated w
hich nearly doubles fS
R .
• T
his allows a higher operating frequency, and / or a higher
capacitive load in circuit applications.
• Besides, nearly sym
metric S
pice Param
eters are obtained for both ports.
• N
ow, w
ithout dominance of second order effects, better technological
conditions can further improve the inductor perform
ance.
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
Characteristic Inductor D
ata
Type of Inductor
Ls(nH)
tsp_sub(µm
)R
s( ΩΩΩ Ω
)W(µm
)S(µm
)D
out(µm
)
A2 spirals in series1 spiral in m
etal 4,1 spiral in M
3 parallel M2
conventional winding
153...3.3
138
2192
B2 spirals in series1 spiral in m
etal 4,1 spiral in M
3 parallel M2
new w
inding
14.73...3.3
158
2192
C1 spiral in m
etal 414.6
≈≈≈ ≈ 616
72
250
tsp_sub: thickness of isolation between spiral and silicon substrate
W : w
idth of metal track S
: spacing between turns
Dout: outer diam
eter of spiral
+,-+./01234 546 7089:;<=>= <?@A:9 3;BC :DEFG0 :HI0 :.9 3J
KKKL728%M.71:40 501 D:4 371N L14 .
O<PP > MQ55:76 2DN:0N0 :R0G
0.00.4
0.81.2
1.62.0
0 1 2 3 4 5
L = 92 - 95 nH
0.01 ΩΩΩ Ωcm
ρρρ ρS
i = 15 ΩΩΩ Ωcm
newstacked
onespiral
conv.stacked
Quality Factor
Frequency (G
Hz)
Conventionally stacked:
• Large parasitic capacitance betw
een both spirals is dom
inant.• fS
R is strongly decreased.
• Low influence of im
proved isolation and substrate resistivity.
Spiral
8 µmburiedoxide
Improved Isolation