Upload
ross-hugh
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Theoretical solutions for NATM excavation in soft rock with non-
hydrostatic in-situ stresses
Nagasaki University
Z. Guan
Y. Jiang
Y.Tanabasi1. Philosophy and construction process2. Key problem: convergence released before and after supporting installation
1. Vertical in-situ stress Pv and horizontal in-situ stress Ph are apparently different from each other in most occasions
1. Constitutive law: strain-softening model2. Three zones: elastic zone, strain-softening zone and plastic-flow zone
1. Introducing some assumption2. Relatively simple without numerical method involved and useful for primary design
Background--NATM
Philosophy of NATM Construction process Key problem in the
design of supporting
Philosophy of the research
Analytical model for cross section
Take face effect (longitudinal effect) into account
Figure1 Schematic representation of NATM Bac
k
Analytical model for cross section
Plane strain problem Strain-softening
deformation characteristic Non-hydrostatic in-situ
stresses
Figure2 Plane strain analytical model for cross section
p'3ε
ε 1p'
ε 3p
p1ε
f
h
+
3ε
ε 1e1ε f
1ε
E'E
*
c
= eε 1fε 1
pε 1eε 1
3=constant
1ε
1- 3
1
3 3
1
c
13 dhd 333111 ; dd ee
Constitutive law for soft rock
Figure3 Typical stress and strain curves under triaxial tests
311'
1 )( pe
c KE
eccE1
*'
)1(
Relationship between 1 and
3Mohr-Coulomb Criterion
Plastic Poisson Ratio h
Relationship between 1 and 3
Back
p'3ε
ε 1p'
ε 3p
p1ε
f
h
+
3ε
ε 1e1ε f
1ε
E'E
*
c
= eε 1fε 1
pε 1eε 1
3=constant
1ε
1- 3
1
3 3
1
c
3*
1 Pc K 333111 ; dd ff
13 dfd
Constitutive law for soft rock
Figure3 Typical stress and strain curves under triaxial tests
Relationship between 1 and
3Mohr-Coulomb Criterion
Plastic Poisson Ratio
Relationship between 1 and 3
Back
Angle-wise approximation assumption
20hv PP
P
20
hv PPS
1
2cos42)( 00
p
ci K
SPP
So that the stress state at the inner boundary could verify Mohr-coulomb criterion exactly.
rpct K
Figure4 Classical problem in elasticity
loadings Vertical far field stress Pv horizontal far field stress Ph Inner pressure Pi() varying with
azimuth
Angle-wise approximation
assumption approximate its solution in elastic zone to the classical one mentioned above
The essence of this assumption is to neglect shear deformation in rock mass
1
2cos42 00
p
cer K
SP
)2cos)14((1
00
SPE
er
er
)2cos)43((1
00
SPE
er
et
eet
e Ru
Figure5 Approximation for an infinitesimal azimuth
At elastic boundary (r=Re)
Analytical solutions in strain-softening zone
Equilibrium equation
0
rdr
d trr
Geometry equation
r
u
dr
dutr
et
er h
r
uh
dr
du
Displacement governing equation
Stress governing equation
r
E
rr
K
dr
d ettssc
rpr )(1 '
et
er
h
eet
erss r
Rh
h
ru
1
)1(
et
er
h
eet
errss r
Rhh
h
1
)1(
1
et
er
h
eet
ertss r
Rh
h
1
)1(
1
)1(
0
)1(
00
1
pk
e
h
e
pp
crss r
RC
r
R
Kh
Z
K
Z
rsspettssctss KE )('
h
EZ
er
et
1
)('0
pp
cer Kh
Z
K
ZC
000 1
Analytical solutions in plastic-flow zone
Displacement governing equation
Stress governing equation
ft
fr h
r
uf
dr
du
rr
K
dr
d cr
pr*1
ft
fr
f
fft
frpf r
Rf
f
ru
1
)1(
)1(
**pK
ffrp
frccrpf r
RK
rpfpctpf K *
u, and in all three zones could be expressed as the functions of radius r, with two parameters Re and Rf unknown
Equilibrium equation
0
rdr
d trr
Geometry equation
r
u
dr
dutr
Determination of Re and Rf
Continuum condition of tangent stress t at Rf boundary
ff RrtRrt ||
Continuum condition of radial stress r at tunnel wall boundary
22
22
)()21(
)(
)1(caac
caa
ac
cc
tRR
tRR
R
EK
Kc is Radial stiffness of lining
ra is the interaction force between rock mass and lining
ua is the tunnel wall convergence
acar uK
Set up an analytical solutions for cross section model
u, and in all three zones are totally determined
Equivalent series stiffness hypothesis
Before supporting The face carry the loading
partly Pre-released displacement
occurs
After supporting and face advancing away
The supporting together with rock mass carry the full load
Displacement release goes on, until to the ultimate convergence
Kc
Lining stiffness in reality
ciniequ KKK
111
Back-analyze Kini
initial stiffness due to face
Pre-released displacement
Ultimate convergence
Kequ uaEquivalent series stiffness
Forward-analyze
Equivalent series stiffness
Figure6 Physical significance of Kequ
Summary of theoretical solutions
Introduce angle-wise approximation assumption to simplify non-hydrostatic in-situ stresses
Introduce equivalent series stiffness hypothesis to take pre-released displacement into account
For every infinitesimal azimuth , search for proper Re and Rf that verify all the boundary and continuum conditions
To determine all the state variables (u, and ) in three zones, especially ultimate convergence (ua)
Basic case: Pv=2.5, Ph=1.5
Both of two zones connected
Solution implementation
Parameters employed in the basic case
Calculation results
E (Mpa) h f () c (Mpa) c* (Mpa)
2000 0.3 1.33 1.88 0.41 25 1 0.65
Pv (Mpa) Ph (Mpa) Ra (m) Ec (Mpa) c tc (m)
2.5 1.5 5 20000 0.25 0.1 0.3
Pv=2.75, Ph=1.25
Only s-s zones connected
Pv=3.0, Ph=1.0
Both of two zones separated
Case studies
The object Reveal the influence of different parameters on the
supporting effect in NATM Provide primary design and suggestion for NATM
The evaluation indices Re (the range of strain-softening zone), ua (the ultimate
convergence of tunnel wall) and Eng (energy stored in equivalent lining)
Dimensionless indices, Re/Re0, ua/ua0 and Eng/Eng0 are employed in case studies to standardize and highlight the variation of them
2
2
1aequuKEng
Influence of rock mass properties
c and c* influence both Re and ua greatly
c and c* determine the energy storage capability of rock mass
E influences ua drastically, whereas takes little effect on Re
E only change the energy storage proportion between elastic zone and lining
Influence of supporting properties
In theory Kc play identical role to
Kini
In practice Kini vary hundred times according
to It is difficult to control
Suggestion Pay more attention to and Kini It is better that make Kini equal
to Kc
Conclusions
Establish a set of solutions and implementation for NATM excavation in soft rock with non-hydrostatic in-situ stresses
After case studies, it is clarified that these solutions could predict the state of NATM excavation well, and useful for primary design of supporting