Upload
reynard-riley
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Theory and Practice
Candice AndersonToronto, Canada
Zero Waste
Practice •Case study examples of San Francisco and South Australia •Refers to diversion of materials from landfill or incineration•Increased recycling and composting
Theory vs Practice
Practice •Case study examples of San Francisco and South Australia •Refers to diversion of materials from landfill or incineration•Increased recycling and composting
Theory•Derived from grassroots community, individuals •Expressed as a set of principles
Practice •Case study examples of San Francisco and South Australia •Refers to diversion of materials from landfill or incineration•Increased recycling and composting
Zero waste theory principles
1. Waste is unusable, unwanted and unrecyclable objects/materials
2. ZW is a visionary goal3. Waste must be avoided and eliminated from
the source4. Waste is evidence of poor design5. Waste must be avoided/eliminated, not
reduced or minimized6. Eliminate toxins7. Adhere to the principle of highest and best use 8. There are barriers to the realization of ZW
Redefining Waste
Unusable
Unwanted
Unrecyclable
Subjective
Accounts for changes in lifecycle
New perspective new problems
Much waste is produced
Visionary Goal
• Unconventional solutions
• Outside “garbage mentality”
• “Fundamental challenge to business as usual” GRRN
Waste must be avoided and eliminated from the source
“Waste that is not generated cannot create any problems making non-generation the cheapest waste handling measure” (Kharbanda and Stallworthy 1990)
Waste is evidence of poor design
Zero Waste involves moving from the back end of waste disposal to the front end of resource management. If a product can't be reused, repaired, rebuilt, refurbished, refinished, resold, recycled or composted, then it should be restricted, redesigned, or removed from production.
Zero Waste International Alliance
Waste must be eliminated, not reduced or minimized
• Aim for “Zero Waste” not “Less Waste”
• Reduction is potentially more dangerous
• Zero allows for a perpetual goal
• Go beyond zero – achieve maximum benefit
Eliminate Toxins
• Utilize the precautionary principle
• Reduction is potentially more dangerous
• For those that can’t be eliminated, reuse safely to maximum benefit and effectiveness
Adhere to the principle of highest and best use
• Materials vs function
• “Creating complexity costs money and other resources. Conserving complexity is an example of reusing function. When you destroy complexity without making use of it, you squander resources” Getting to Zero Waste
Recognize barriers
• Institutional and ideological barriers preventing implementation of zero waste theory – Authority, control, information – Linear industrial system, globalization,
consumer culture, perceived/planned obsolescence
– Habit, tokenism, rebound effect
In Practice – Policies
• Policy documents adhere closely to zero waste theory in both SA & SF
• SA mission to Avoid, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
• SF aims to “eliminate waste and pollution…by redesigning the manufacture, use, and recycling of materials…valuing the highest and best use of materials”
Case Studies South Australia San Francisco
Population 1.6 million (1.1 in Adelaide) 835,364
Density 1295 persons/km2 (Adelaide) 6847 persons/km2
Per capita generation 490kg 609kg
Beginning of ZW movement
2003 2002
% to landfill 46% 28%
Diversion rates 54% MSW, 76% C&I waste, 72% C&D waste 72% MSW
Goals 70% diversion of MSW by 2015
75% diversion of C&I by 2015
90% diversion of C&D by 2015
5% reduction in waste generation per capita by 2015
100% diversion of MSW by 2020
65% of C&D
SF Practice Highlights
• Plastic bag ban
• Styrofoam ban, mandatory compostable/recyclable substitutes
• Mandatory recycling/composting
• Facility tours, art program
• Toxic Reductions Program
SA Practice Highlights
• Zero Waste South Australia
• National strategy
• Plastic bag ban
• Local recycling processing
• Research centre
• Comprehensive strategy
Conclusion
• Zero waste goes beyond diversion efforts
• Adhere to theory to maintain integrity of concept
• Perpetual goal to zero
• Maintain visionary aspect of zero waste