12
Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization Szabolcs Borsányi University of Heidelberg in collaboration with J. Berges, C. different levels of equilibration is reached at different time scales; some equilbrium features appear earlier, some appear later; prethermalization: bulk

Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization. Szabolcs Borsányi University of Heidelberg. different levels of equilibration is reached at different time scales; some equilbrium features appear earlier, some appear later; - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Thermal featuresfar from equilibrium

Prethermalization

Szabolcs BorsaacutenyiUniversity of Heidelberg

in collaboration withJ Berges C Wetterich

different levels of equilibration is reached at different time scales

some equilbrium features appear earliersome appear later

prethermalization bulk observables settle close to the final value

LTE in heavy ion collisions

How can the local equilibrium established

Present estimates for thermalization

tLTE gt 2-3 fmc

ideal hydro equations of motion

HiranoNara 2004Kolb et al

t0 = 06 fmc

Theoretical description

Classical approximation (wave dynamics)bull only low-momentum physics nonrenormalizable

nonperturbative off-shellbull classical equilibrium ne quantum equlibrium

Kinetic theories (incoherent particleparton dynamics)

bull elastic or inelastic scattering perturbative on-shell

bull problems at early times coherence gradient expansion

bull Eg pQCD parton cascade shower simulations

Resummed expansion scheme 2PI

bull Inclusion of off-shell processes

bull applicable both for early and late times

2PI resummed chiral model

bull Chiral quark model in 3+1 dimensions(two quark four scalar degree of freedom symmetric phase)

bull We solve the nonequilibrium gap equation

momentumspace

coordinatespace

Levels of equilibration

Damping Thermalization

Prethermalization

SzB Szeacutep 2000

Berges SzB Serreau 2003

Damping time

bull Initial relaxation of propagatorstime-local G(t1t2=t1p) non-local G(t1t2=0p)

bull With of the spectral function (Im )

bull No substantial evolution

bull Physical meaningndash signal loss

bull signal on top of equilibrium ensemble

bull compare decay rate to Im(p) they agree

ndash shorter than thermalization

Nonequilibrium KMS condition

Equilibrium (KMS condition)

Out of equilibrium (generalized KMS)

Define n(t) at the peak of the spectral function

Express n(t) as a function of the peak location

If this relation holds for close-to-the-peak frequencies as well a Boltzmann equation may be derived from the 2PI gap equation

F and are the outcome of the dynamics Initially they were independent variables

The particle distribution is established on the damping time scale

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 2: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

LTE in heavy ion collisions

How can the local equilibrium established

Present estimates for thermalization

tLTE gt 2-3 fmc

ideal hydro equations of motion

HiranoNara 2004Kolb et al

t0 = 06 fmc

Theoretical description

Classical approximation (wave dynamics)bull only low-momentum physics nonrenormalizable

nonperturbative off-shellbull classical equilibrium ne quantum equlibrium

Kinetic theories (incoherent particleparton dynamics)

bull elastic or inelastic scattering perturbative on-shell

bull problems at early times coherence gradient expansion

bull Eg pQCD parton cascade shower simulations

Resummed expansion scheme 2PI

bull Inclusion of off-shell processes

bull applicable both for early and late times

2PI resummed chiral model

bull Chiral quark model in 3+1 dimensions(two quark four scalar degree of freedom symmetric phase)

bull We solve the nonequilibrium gap equation

momentumspace

coordinatespace

Levels of equilibration

Damping Thermalization

Prethermalization

SzB Szeacutep 2000

Berges SzB Serreau 2003

Damping time

bull Initial relaxation of propagatorstime-local G(t1t2=t1p) non-local G(t1t2=0p)

bull With of the spectral function (Im )

bull No substantial evolution

bull Physical meaningndash signal loss

bull signal on top of equilibrium ensemble

bull compare decay rate to Im(p) they agree

ndash shorter than thermalization

Nonequilibrium KMS condition

Equilibrium (KMS condition)

Out of equilibrium (generalized KMS)

Define n(t) at the peak of the spectral function

Express n(t) as a function of the peak location

If this relation holds for close-to-the-peak frequencies as well a Boltzmann equation may be derived from the 2PI gap equation

F and are the outcome of the dynamics Initially they were independent variables

The particle distribution is established on the damping time scale

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 3: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Theoretical description

Classical approximation (wave dynamics)bull only low-momentum physics nonrenormalizable

nonperturbative off-shellbull classical equilibrium ne quantum equlibrium

Kinetic theories (incoherent particleparton dynamics)

bull elastic or inelastic scattering perturbative on-shell

bull problems at early times coherence gradient expansion

bull Eg pQCD parton cascade shower simulations

Resummed expansion scheme 2PI

bull Inclusion of off-shell processes

bull applicable both for early and late times

2PI resummed chiral model

bull Chiral quark model in 3+1 dimensions(two quark four scalar degree of freedom symmetric phase)

bull We solve the nonequilibrium gap equation

momentumspace

coordinatespace

Levels of equilibration

Damping Thermalization

Prethermalization

SzB Szeacutep 2000

Berges SzB Serreau 2003

Damping time

bull Initial relaxation of propagatorstime-local G(t1t2=t1p) non-local G(t1t2=0p)

bull With of the spectral function (Im )

bull No substantial evolution

bull Physical meaningndash signal loss

bull signal on top of equilibrium ensemble

bull compare decay rate to Im(p) they agree

ndash shorter than thermalization

Nonequilibrium KMS condition

Equilibrium (KMS condition)

Out of equilibrium (generalized KMS)

Define n(t) at the peak of the spectral function

Express n(t) as a function of the peak location

If this relation holds for close-to-the-peak frequencies as well a Boltzmann equation may be derived from the 2PI gap equation

F and are the outcome of the dynamics Initially they were independent variables

The particle distribution is established on the damping time scale

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 4: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

2PI resummed chiral model

bull Chiral quark model in 3+1 dimensions(two quark four scalar degree of freedom symmetric phase)

bull We solve the nonequilibrium gap equation

momentumspace

coordinatespace

Levels of equilibration

Damping Thermalization

Prethermalization

SzB Szeacutep 2000

Berges SzB Serreau 2003

Damping time

bull Initial relaxation of propagatorstime-local G(t1t2=t1p) non-local G(t1t2=0p)

bull With of the spectral function (Im )

bull No substantial evolution

bull Physical meaningndash signal loss

bull signal on top of equilibrium ensemble

bull compare decay rate to Im(p) they agree

ndash shorter than thermalization

Nonequilibrium KMS condition

Equilibrium (KMS condition)

Out of equilibrium (generalized KMS)

Define n(t) at the peak of the spectral function

Express n(t) as a function of the peak location

If this relation holds for close-to-the-peak frequencies as well a Boltzmann equation may be derived from the 2PI gap equation

F and are the outcome of the dynamics Initially they were independent variables

The particle distribution is established on the damping time scale

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 5: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Levels of equilibration

Damping Thermalization

Prethermalization

SzB Szeacutep 2000

Berges SzB Serreau 2003

Damping time

bull Initial relaxation of propagatorstime-local G(t1t2=t1p) non-local G(t1t2=0p)

bull With of the spectral function (Im )

bull No substantial evolution

bull Physical meaningndash signal loss

bull signal on top of equilibrium ensemble

bull compare decay rate to Im(p) they agree

ndash shorter than thermalization

Nonequilibrium KMS condition

Equilibrium (KMS condition)

Out of equilibrium (generalized KMS)

Define n(t) at the peak of the spectral function

Express n(t) as a function of the peak location

If this relation holds for close-to-the-peak frequencies as well a Boltzmann equation may be derived from the 2PI gap equation

F and are the outcome of the dynamics Initially they were independent variables

The particle distribution is established on the damping time scale

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 6: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

SzB Szeacutep 2000

Berges SzB Serreau 2003

Damping time

bull Initial relaxation of propagatorstime-local G(t1t2=t1p) non-local G(t1t2=0p)

bull With of the spectral function (Im )

bull No substantial evolution

bull Physical meaningndash signal loss

bull signal on top of equilibrium ensemble

bull compare decay rate to Im(p) they agree

ndash shorter than thermalization

Nonequilibrium KMS condition

Equilibrium (KMS condition)

Out of equilibrium (generalized KMS)

Define n(t) at the peak of the spectral function

Express n(t) as a function of the peak location

If this relation holds for close-to-the-peak frequencies as well a Boltzmann equation may be derived from the 2PI gap equation

F and are the outcome of the dynamics Initially they were independent variables

The particle distribution is established on the damping time scale

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 7: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Nonequilibrium KMS condition

Equilibrium (KMS condition)

Out of equilibrium (generalized KMS)

Define n(t) at the peak of the spectral function

Express n(t) as a function of the peak location

If this relation holds for close-to-the-peak frequencies as well a Boltzmann equation may be derived from the 2PI gap equation

F and are the outcome of the dynamics Initially they were independent variables

The particle distribution is established on the damping time scale

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 8: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Even earlier prethermalization

bull Kinetic energy kinetic temperature

Virial theorem(for weakly coupled fields)

if local equilibriumthen kinetic energy frac14 gradient energy + potential energy

This behavior has been also seen in classical field theory

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 9: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Equation of state

Loss of phase informationLoss of coherencetpt Temperature = 225

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

Prethermalization is a universal far-from-equilibrium phenomenon which describes a very rapid establishment of an almost constant equation of state as well as kinetic temperature

similar behavior in Classical Field Theory(reheating after cosmological inflation)

coupling independent ldquoDephasingrdquo

SzB Patkoacutes Sexty 2003

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 10: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Inhomogeneous ensemble

Prethermalizationbull Very early evolutionbull Far-from-equilibriumbull High occupation numbersbull Weak sensitivity to

interaction details

O(4) model withrealistic mass scales

Pretherm

lt 05 fmc

We find After Pretherm

pressure()energy() is and independent

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 11: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

What can we say for heavy ion physics

bull Assume Qs sets only the relevant scale of the early dynamics

bull Prethermalization time is coupling independent (2-25 T-1)inserting Qs for temperature scale and using a prefactor of 3

tpt frac14 06 fmc

bull After this time stable equation of state kinetic temperature

bull If we start our model with larger Yukawa coupling frac14 3Damping time Prethermalization time

Even if equilibrium is reached laterbull fluctuation dissipation (KMS) relation

bull slowly evolving spectra

bull equation of state

Even Hydrodynamics may work

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
Page 12: Thermal features far from equilibrium: Prethermalization

Summary

bull Equilibration can be splitted to different stepsprethermalization damping thermalization

bull One of the scales is insensitive to coupling prethermalizationndash generic phenomenon present in various scenarios

bull After damping time nonequilibrium KMS relationbull Damping and prethermalization may coincide for

heavy ion collisions it gives about frac14 06 fmcbull This can be an ingredient to understand the

success of hydrodynamic description

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12