1
21 Sunday Argus December 13, 2015 Arts T HE WONDER of it is that, after 23 years of Bitterkomix and associated publications, Anton Kannemeyer has lost none of his trenchancy or urgency. His work remains as uncompromisingly and salutarily obscene as ever – and every bit as offensive. In Kannemeyer’s world offensive is good. It means he’s getting his point across. And the point is: to precisely the extent that he makes his viewer feel uncomfortable and out of sorts, Kannemeyer achieves his purpose. Characteristically, when his stuff works best, he contrives to make you feel on edge, as though you are intruding on or witnessing something you have no business seeing, something from which, in decency, you ought to be averting your eyes. At his best, he makes you feel somehow complicit in an act of psychological violence from which there is no escape. Pappa in Doubt is a follow-on to the satiric Pappa in Afrika (2010), a look at the paradoxes of life in the postcolony. So we have a pair of drawings titled (with dripping irony) “Fair Maidens from Africa”. The images call to mind a fairly well-developed genre of tourist kitsch in which the maidens are shown semi-naked in “traditional attire” – beads and hardly anything else. They are presented in celebration of innocence and childlike simplicity, caught up in a timeless bubble, where tradition endlessly repeats itself and the passage of time does not stamp itself in development or change. In this seemingly benign and indulgent gesture, however, there lurks a discourse of the most terrifying historical toxicity. By reducing native Africans to the status of children, the colonisers set themselves up as the responsible adults and to inscribe a version of reality in which it was it was no more and no less than a bounden duty to guide, to lead them into the domain of history, that is to say to “civilise”, to save their heathen souls. All this was largely through learning the benefits of hard work, of course, but also through a surrendering of human agency and by (in the colonisers’ imagination) accepting the destiny of having Europeans controlling every facet of life for their “improvement”. Indeed, the narrative of Africans – incidentally those same Africans who, in the European Middle Ages, boasted one of the great centres of mathematical learning at Timbuktu – as children, in need of guidance, discipline and the wise intervention of the colonisers, proved the key notion justifying and legitimising the entire colonial project and allowing Europeans to escape responsibility for the rapacity they proceeded to visit upon the colonised. As this colonial metatext plays out in the “fair maidens” genre, there is – ironically – another, altogether less rarified, subtext. In the colonial and post-colonial version of things, Africans were natural creatures, not fully human in the sense as “Europeans” – and therefore not subject to the same rules of modesty and concealment that became the lot of humans with Eve’s disgrace in the garden of Eden. And thus it came about, even in the most repressed times in South Africa’s repressive and puritanical history, there was in the postcard genre of the fair maiden and ethnographic photography in general, an unacknowledged subcategory of soft porn available to the youth and manhood of white South Africa. Such considerations, of course, yet further confound the sickening discomfort provoked by Kannemeyer depicting “fair maidens” – far from some timeless tradition – as caught up, in the most brutal way possible, in the unfolding of African history. Their hands have been chopped off – as by rampaging drug-crazed militias in west Africa, most notoriously in recent times in Sierra Leone – as a tactic of war aimed at debilitating the enemy’s supply lines and sowing demoralisation. The image – the violence that is done through the electric fissure of opposed versions of reality is both sickening and arresting, and Kannemeyer’s audience is left with a sense that such realities demand some kind of response from us as fellow humans that has not yet been forthcoming. Just when you think you’ve integrated the jaggedness of your response to Kannemeyer’s maidens, you turn the page to an illustration of: “Nsala, of the district of Wala, looking at the severed hand and foot of his five year old daughter, Boali, a victim of the Anglo-Belgian India Rubber Company militia”. A lot of what Kannemeyer does is more conventionally confrontational. In this vein – recalling the brouhaha surrounding artist Brett Murray’s The Spear Kannemeyer shows a group of worshipful, middle-aged, white men paying homage to the vision of a giant erect phallus. In Papa in Doubt, Kannemeyer continues to push offensive stereotype to new levels of offensiveness, much of which cannot be reproduced here. Balanced against this, however, he has begun to explore portraiture and likeness in his strips and graphics. Along with relatively careful likenesses of Zuma and various cabinet ministers, there is a series on African “despots” like Angola’s Eduardo dos Santos and (the dead) Jonas Savimbi, as well as Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir, and Thabo Mbeki (his Aids denialism, for Kannemeyer, gains him membership of the despots’ club) where humour and the comedic convention are dispensed with entirely – and the commentator focuses on “telling it like it is”. His stock in trade, however, continues to be Tintin-from-Hell – nothing short of breathtakingly reductive in its stereotyping of Africans: thick-lip, woolly-hair, entirely devoid of any humanising detail. Kannemeyer devotes two pages (24 panels) to a highly idiosyncratic set of definitional excursions of words either derived from or connected to the “K-word”. In one panel he has God calling down from the heavens, addressing a miserable assortment of victims of the often seemingly mindless violence of man upon man – amputees, cripples, corpses and the like, and using extreme language to suggest holy fellatio. There is, it must be admitted, a temptation to respond to such extreme provocations with a kneejerk rejection – to dismiss Kannemeyer as a cheap sensationalist rather than the serious and philosophical artist I think he is. This would be to commit the most basic of critical fallacies – to confuse the artist’s perspective on reality with what he is uncovering and making plain through his work. Kannemeyer’s alienation of his viewer is calculated to offend against good taste. There is an argument to made that in Kannemeyer’s world, taste and restraint are nothing more or less than cop-out – excuses to accept things the way they are and fail to acknowledge our own guilt or do anything to make things better. There will, be no hiding from the uncomfortable truth, nor from the responsibilities the truth lays upon us if Kannemeyer has anything to do with it. It is this that makes him, despite the relatively ephemeral medium in which he works, one of the most challenging and important artists working in South Africa today – not to mention one of the sharpest, most insightful and, yes, funniest. N URTURING artists at the margins is the passion of Woodstock curator Megan Theunissen, whose Space Between (SB) Gallery in Albert Road seeks to showcase up-and-coming talents and stimulate wider interest among art buyers in work that’s engaging, challenging and accessible. The upper-floor gallery, which forms part of Side Street Studios, was established a year ago, but has already achieved a reputation as a space for new work emerging or evolving from the more or less subversive sector of street art and graffiti. Theunissen describes her ambition as being to “give a central platform to emerging artists and street-related and urban practices, and to under- score the value of urban art”. Street art, the 27-year-old gallerist explains, straddles many divisions, though most artists start out with graffiti, later branching out into other media or forms ranging from illustration to photography and sculpture. They are, typically, practitioners who have not had opportunities to exhibit, as they often don’t match the conventional fine-arts mould, yet whose work “meets international standards of production”. This much is true, she says, of the gallery’s end-of-year summer exhibition, co-curated with intern Alexandra Kreuz Goldberg, which runs at the Albert Road gallery until December 19. Part of Theunissen’s mission is to introduce new buyers into an art market that tends to be defined by expensive work in high-end galleries. Cape Town, she laments, is, in contrast to Joburg, a city whose leisure interests dominate spending patterns. “I know people who’ll spend R2 000 on going out and having fun at the weekend, but are hesitant about spending that kind of money on a work of art,”she says. “But we enjoy training the new buyer. Most of the work we exhibit is accessible and we see our exhibitions as a way to get younger people excited about buying art.” Much of it is also art that reflects young people’s interests and their experiences of contemporary urban life. Theunissen, who grew up in Cape Town and graduated in painting at Michaelis in 2009, is engaged in a master’s degree through Unisa, on the theme of human transience. “Running the gallery and doing my master’s at the same time has meant I don’t have much time for myself... but I am determined to stick my neck out for artists I care about and the gallery gives them an oppor- tunity to develop their careers.” Theunissen picked out some emerging artists to look out for: Nardstar is a Cape Town artist who specialises in graffiti art. Her unique style involves the use of radiant colour schemes and the decon- struction of letters, animals and faces into a harmonious balance of shapes, colours and patterns. She is not restricted to giving life to plain walls but also experiments with mediums including digital work inks, acrylics and printmaking. She enjoys using art to creatively uplift and add beauty to neglected and overlooked places. Russell Abrahams , 22, is a freelance illustrator and artist from Cape Town. After graduating with a diploma in graphic design, he became a full- time illustrator. He makes work that is relevant to the youth of today. Last year he was a Design Indaba Emerging Creative. This year, he was one of the Woolworths x Pharrell Williams T-shirt design winners, took part in five group exhibitions, and was selected for Essie Letterpress’s 2016 Artist Almanac calendar. Alexis Aronson, born in 1985, is a self-taught artist and illustrator in Cape Town. Her subject matter is a collective of “beasts”, somewhat human, somehow animal, sometimes spirit-being. These are the “strange ancestors” (as she likes to call them), who she feels she has met rather than created. Alexis’s primary inspiration is drawn from the nature and her love for the natural world. James White is a 27-year-old emerging artist with a background in graphic design and painting. He produces woodcut installations as an extension of his passion for graphic design. In 2016 he will continue exhibiting and collaborating with new artists. Damn Vandal (Shaun Oakley) is a 28-year-old graffiti artist and illustrator who grew up in Durban. He has a degree in Visual Communications, and 12-year background in graffiti. He describes his style as a fusion of vector illustration and graffiti style and says much of his work represents the urban/street lifestyle “and the world around me”. I T WAS hard not to be moved when IFP MP Dr Mario Oriani- Ambrosini, ill with cancer and wearing a suit too big for his shrunken frame, pleaded in Parliament for the legalisation of dagga for medical purposes. He disclosed that he had been using dagga: “I was supposed to die many months ago and I am here because I had the courage of taking illegal treatments... here in South Africa in the form of cannabis, marijuana or dagga. “Otherwise, I would be pumped with morphine and I would not be able to speak to you, Mr President.” He said it was “a crime against humanity” to deprive medical marijuana to people who needed it. But just six months after his plea in Parliament in February last year and in the terminal stages of lung cancer, Ambrosini was dead, apparently as a result of suicide. And the Medical Innovation Bill he tabled is still languishing with the parliamentary portfolio committee on health. Dagga, marijuana, ganja, bhang, or cannabis sativa and indica, to give it its botanical names, was used by South Africans well before whites settled here in 1652. Sativa means cultivated and dagga is believed to be one of the world’s oldest cultivated crops. It has been used medically, mystically and for recreation. Grahamstown-based artist and novelist Hazel Crampton cites the Venidad, a Persian religious text dating back to the seventh century BC, as listing dagga as the most important of 10 000 medicinal plants. It has been used as an anaesthetic, a painkiller, an aphrodisiac, to treat hypertension, chest problems and glaucoma, an appetite stimulant and for the promotion of “great mental cheerfulness”. In various countries in the 20th century, including South Africa, its use was banned, often because it was lumped in with opiates including heroin, morphine and opium. She provides some interesting facts, such as a World Health Organisation report of November 1971 which said young dagga users “were less likely to show aggressive behaviour than juveniles who preferred alcohol”. She says not all dagga is the same and the weed smoked in Europe and America is high in levels of cannabidiol or CBD, which blocks feelings of anxiety, while South African dagga is low in CBD levels and therefore can cause much anxiety. She says by last year the cost of arresting and convicting a single “low-level dagga user” had ballooned to R240 000, money which she argues could be better spent fighting high-priority crimes. Crampton is not impartial in the debate over dagga – she clearly believes it should be decriminalised, licensed and controlled – but she makes an interesting and often compelling case. “The story of the demonisation of dagga is – to borrow a phrase from a slightly different context – ‘one of shaky science, misjudg- ments and misunderstandings, media scares, and once-important but now long-dead political agendas’,” writes Crampton. Her book is not intended to be a comprehensive take on dagga, but merely, she says, a conversation piece to provide some background and ignite debate on issues such as licensing, legalisation and taxation. It is an issue that’s not going away – even the African Christian Democratic Party has supported its decriminalisation for medical use. Book Corner This Pappa don’t preach IN YOUR FACE: Details from images in Pappa in Doubt by Anton Kannemeyer – African ‘despots’ club (left and below right) and fair maidens (below, left). Space where art meets the heat of the street Weeding out misunderstandings of marijuana use DAGGA – A SHORT HISTORY HAZEL CRAMPTON Jacana Vivien Horler Michael Morris Artful Ivor Powell Graphic Point It is 23 years since Anton Kannemeyer and then-sidekick Conrad Botes first scandalised readers with the in-your-face, risqué satire that was the hallmark of ‘Bitterkomix’, their core publication. Brutal and unflinching in its telling of truth, this graphic art held up a mirror that, although shocking and shameful in what it revealed, remained all too recognisable to South Africans.

This Pappa don’t preach - STEVENSON...including digital work inks, acrylics and printmaking. She enjoys using art to creatively uplift and add beauty to neglected and overlooked

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: This Pappa don’t preach - STEVENSON...including digital work inks, acrylics and printmaking. She enjoys using art to creatively uplift and add beauty to neglected and overlooked

21Sunday Argus December 13, 2015 Arts

THE WONDER of it is that,after 23 years ofBitterkomix and associatedpublications, AntonKannemeyer has lost none

of his trenchancy or urgency. Hiswork remains as uncompromisinglyand salutarily obscene as ever – andevery bit as offensive.

In Kannemeyer’s world offensiveis good. It means he’s getting hispoint across.

And the point is: to precisely theextent that he makes his viewer feeluncomfortable and out of sorts,Kannemeyer achieves his purpose.Characteristically, when his stuffworks best, he contrives to make youfeel on edge, as though you areintruding on or witnessingsomething you have no businessseeing, something from which, indecency, you ought to be avertingyour eyes. At his best, he makes youfeel somehow complicit in an act ofpsychological violence from whichthere is no escape.

Pappa in Doubt is a follow-on tothe satiric Pappa in Afrika (2010), alook at the paradoxes of life in thepostcolony.

So we have a pair of drawingstitled (with dripping irony) “FairMaidens from Africa”. The imagescall to mind a fairly well-developedgenre of tourist kitsch in which themaidens are shown semi-naked in“traditional attire” – beads andhardly anything else.

They are presented in celebrationof innocence and childlikesimplicity, caught up in a timelessbubble, where tradition endlesslyrepeats itself and the passage oftime does not stamp itself indevelopment or change.

In this seemingly benign andindulgent gesture, however, therelurks a discourse of the mostterrifying historical toxicity. Byreducing native Africans to thestatus of children, the colonisers setthemselves up as the responsibleadults and to inscribe a version ofreality in which it was it was nomore and no less than a boundenduty to guide, to lead them into thedomain of history, that is to say to“civilise”, to save their heathensouls. All this was largely throughlearning the benefits of hard work,of course, but also through asurrendering of human agency andby (in the colonisers’ imagination)accepting the destiny of havingEuropeans controlling every facet oflife for their “improvement”.

Indeed, the narrative of Africans– incidentally those same Africanswho, in the European Middle Ages,boasted one of the great centres of mathematical learning atTimbuktu – as children, in need ofguidance, discipline and the wiseintervention of the colonisers,proved the key notion justifying andlegitimising the entire colonialproject and allowing Europeans toescape responsibility for therapacity they proceeded to visitupon the colonised.

As this colonial metatext playsout in the “fair maidens” genre,there is – ironically – another,altogether less rarified, subtext. Inthe colonial and post-colonialversion of things, Africans werenatural creatures, not fully humanin the sense as “Europeans” – andtherefore not subject to the samerules of modesty and concealmentthat became the lot of humans withEve’s disgrace in the garden ofEden. And thus it came about, evenin the most repressed times in SouthAfrica’s repressive and puritanicalhistory, there was in the postcardgenre of the fair maiden andethnographic photography ingeneral, an unacknowledgedsubcategory of soft porn available tothe youth and manhood of whiteSouth Africa.

Such considerations, of course,yet further confound the sickeningdiscomfort provoked by

Kannemeyer depicting “fairmaidens” – far from some timelesstradition – as caught up, in the mostbrutal way possible, in the unfoldingof African history. Their hands havebeen chopped off – as by rampagingdrug-crazed militias in west Africa,most notoriously in recent times inSierra Leone – as a tactic of waraimed at debilitating the enemy’ssupply lines and sowingdemoralisation.

The image – the violence that isdone through the electric fissure ofopposed versions of reality is bothsickening and arresting, and

Kannemeyer’s audience is left with asense that such realities demandsome kind of response from us asfellow humans that has not yet beenforthcoming.

Just when you think you’veintegrated the jaggedness of yourresponse to Kannemeyer’s maidens,you turn the page to an illustrationof: “Nsala, of the district of Wala,looking at the severed hand and footof his five year old daughter, Boali, avictim of the Anglo-Belgian IndiaRubber Company militia”.

A lot of what Kannemeyer does ismore conventionally

confrontational. In this vein –recalling the brouhaha surroundingartist Brett Murray’s The Spear –Kannemeyer shows a group ofworshipful, middle-aged, white menpaying homage to the vision of agiant erect phallus.

In Papa in Doubt, Kannemeyercontinues to push offensivestereotype to new levels ofoffensiveness, much of whichcannot be reproduced here.

Balanced against this, however,he has begun to explore portraitureand likeness in his strips andgraphics. Along with relatively

careful likenesses of Zuma andvarious cabinet ministers, there is aseries on African “despots” likeAngola’s Eduardo dos Santos and(the dead) Jonas Savimbi, as well asSudanese president Omar al-Bashir,and Thabo Mbeki (his Aidsdenialism, for Kannemeyer, gainshim membership of the despots’club) where humour and thecomedic convention are dispensedwith entirely – and the commentatorfocuses on “telling it like it is”.

His stock in trade, however,continues to be Tintin-from-Hell –nothing short of breathtakinglyreductive in its stereotyping ofAfricans: thick-lip, woolly-hair,entirely devoid of any humanisingdetail. Kannemeyer devotes twopages (24 panels) to a highlyidiosyncratic set of definitionalexcursions of words either derivedfrom or connected to the “K-word”.

In one panel he has God callingdown from the heavens, addressing amiserable assortment of victims ofthe often seemingly mindlessviolence of man upon man –amputees, cripples, corpses and thelike, and using extreme language tosuggest holy fellatio.

There is, it must be admitted, atemptation to respond to suchextreme provocations with akneejerk rejection – to dismissKannemeyer as a cheapsensationalist rather than theserious and philosophical artist Ithink he is.

This would be to commit the mostbasic of critical fallacies – to confusethe artist’s perspective on realitywith what he is uncovering andmaking plain through his work.

Kannemeyer’s alienation of hisviewer is calculated to offend againstgood taste.

There is an argument to madethat in Kannemeyer’s world, tasteand restraint are nothing more orless than cop-out – excuses to acceptthings the way they are and fail toacknowledge our own guilt or doanything to make things better.

There will, be no hiding from theuncomfortable truth, nor from theresponsibilities the truth lays uponus if Kannemeyer has anything todo with it.

It is this that makes him, despitethe relatively ephemeral medium inwhich he works, one of the mostchallenging and important artistsworking in South Africa today – notto mention one of the sharpest, mostinsightful and, yes, funniest.

NURTURING artists at themargins is the passion ofWoodstock curatorMegan Theunissen,

whose Space Between (SB)Gallery in Albert Road seeks toshowcase up-and-coming talentsand stimulate wider interestamong art buyers in work that’sengaging, challenging andaccessible.

The upper-floor gallery, which forms part of Side StreetStudios, was established a yearago, but has already achieved areputation as a space for newwork emerging or evolving fromthe more or less subversivesector of street art and graffiti.

Theunissen describes herambition as being to “give acentral platform to emergingartists and street-related andurban practices, and to under-score the value of urban art”.

Street art, the 27-year-oldgallerist explains, straddlesmany divisions, though mostartists start out with graffiti,later branching out into othermedia or forms ranging fromillustration to photography andsculpture.

They are, typically,practitioners who have not hadopportunities to exhibit, as theyoften don’t match theconventional fine-arts mould, yetwhose work “meets internationalstandards of production”.

This much is true, she says, ofthe gallery’s end-of-year summerexhibition, co-curated withintern Alexandra KreuzGoldberg, which runs at theAlbert Road gallery untilDecember 19.

Part of Theunissen’s missionis to introduce new buyers intoan art market that tends to bedefined by expensive work inhigh-end galleries.

Cape Town, she laments, is, incontrast to Joburg, a city whoseleisure interests dominatespending patterns.

“I know people who’ll spendR2 000 on going out and havingfun at the weekend, but arehesitant about spending thatkind of money on a work ofart,”she says.

“But we enjoy training thenew buyer. Most of the work weexhibit is accessible and we seeour exhibitions as a way to getyounger people excited aboutbuying art.”

Much of it is also art thatreflects young people’s interestsand their experiences ofcontemporary urban life.

Theunissen, who grew up inCape Town and graduated inpainting at Michaelis in 2009, isengaged in a master’s degreethrough Unisa, on the theme ofhuman transience.

“Running the gallery anddoing my master’s at the sametime has meant I don’t havemuch time for myself... but I amdetermined to stick my neck outfor artists I care about and thegallery gives them an oppor-tunity to develop their careers.”

Theunissen picked out someemerging artists to look out for:

Nardstar is a Cape Town artist

whospecialises ingraffiti art.Her uniquestyle involvesthe use ofradiant colourschemes andthe decon-struction ofletters, animals and faces into aharmonious balance of shapes,colours and patterns.

She is not restricted to givinglife to plain walls but alsoexperiments with mediumsincluding digital work inks,acrylics and printmaking. Sheenjoys using art to creativelyuplift and add beauty toneglected and overlooked places.

Russell

Abrahams , 22,is a freelanceillustrator andartist fromCape Town.Aftergraduatingwith a diplomain graphicdesign, hebecame a full-time illustrator. He makes workthat is relevant to the youth oftoday. Last year he was a DesignIndaba Emerging Creative. Thisyear, he was one of theWoolworths x Pharrell WilliamsT-shirt design winners, took partin five group exhibitions, andwas selected for EssieLetterpress’s 2016 ArtistAlmanac calendar.

Alexis

Aronson,born in 1985,is a self-taughtartist andillustrator inCape Town.Her subjectmatter is acollective of “beasts”, somewhathuman, somehow animal,sometimes spirit-being. Theseare the “strange ancestors” (asshe likes to call them), who shefeels she has met rather thancreated. Alexis’s primaryinspiration is drawn from thenature and her love for thenatural world.

James White

is a 27-year-oldemergingartist with abackgroundin graphicdesign andpainting. Heproduceswoodcut installations as anextension of his passion forgraphic design. In 2016 he willcontinue exhibiting andcollaborating with new artists.

Damn

Vandal

(ShaunOakley) is a28-year-oldgraffiti artistand illustratorwho grew upin Durban. Hehas a degreein VisualCommunications, and 12-yearbackground in graffiti.

He describes his style as afusion of vector illustration andgraffiti style and says much ofhis work represents theurban/street lifestyle “and theworld around me”.

IT WAS hard not to be movedwhen IFP MP Dr Mario Oriani-Ambrosini, ill with cancer andwearing a suit too big for his

shrunken frame, pleaded inParliament for the legalisation ofdagga for medical purposes.

He disclosed that he had beenusing dagga: “I was supposed to diemany months ago and I am herebecause I had the courage of takingillegal treatments... here in SouthAfrica in the form of cannabis,marijuana or dagga.

“Otherwise, I would be pumpedwith morphine and I would not beable to speak to you, Mr President.”

He said it was “a crime againsthumanity” to deprive medical

marijuana to people who needed it.But just six months after his plea

in Parliament in February last yearand in the terminal stages of lungcancer, Ambrosini was dead,apparently as a result of suicide.And the Medical Innovation Bill he tabled is still languishingwith the parliamentary portfolio

committee on health.Dagga, marijuana, ganja, bhang,

or cannabis sativa and indica, togive it its botanical names, wasused by South Africans well beforewhites settled here in 1652. Sativameans cultivated and dagga isbelieved to be one of the world’soldest cultivated crops. It has beenused medically, mystically and forrecreation.

Grahamstown-based artist andnovelist Hazel Crampton cites theVenidad, a Persian religious textdating back to the seventh centuryBC, as listing dagga as the mostimportant of 10 000 medicinalplants. It has been used as ananaesthetic, a painkiller, an

aphrodisiac, to treat hypertension,chest problems and glaucoma, anappetite stimulant and for thepromotion of “great mentalcheerfulness”.

In various countries in the 20thcentury, including South Africa, itsuse was banned, often because itwas lumped in with opiatesincluding heroin, morphine andopium. She provides someinteresting facts, such as a WorldHealth Organisation report ofNovember 1971 which said youngdagga users “were less likely toshow aggressive behaviour thanjuveniles who preferred alcohol”.

She says not all dagga is thesame and the weed smoked in

Europe and America is high inlevels of cannabidiol or CBD, whichblocks feelings of anxiety, whileSouth African dagga is low in CBDlevels and therefore can causemuch anxiety.

She says by last year the cost ofarresting and convicting a single“low-level dagga user” hadballooned to R240 000, money whichshe argues could be better spentfighting high-priority crimes.

Crampton is not impartial in the debate over dagga – sheclearly believes it should bedecriminalised, licensed andcontrolled – but she makes an interesting and often compelling case.

“The story of the demonisationof dagga is – to borrow a phrasefrom a slightly different context –‘one of shaky science, misjudg-ments and misunderstandings,media scares, and once-importantbut now long-dead politicalagendas’,” writes Crampton.

Her book is not intended to be a comprehensive take ondagga, but merely, she says, aconversation piece to provide somebackground and ignite debate onissues such as licensing,legalisation and taxation.

It is an issue that’s not goingaway – even the African ChristianDemocratic Party has supported itsdecriminalisation for medical use.

Book Corner

This Pappadon’t preach

IN YOURFACE: Detailsfrom images in Pappa inDoubt byAntonKannemeyer –African‘despots’ club(left and belowright) and fairmaidens(below, left).

Space where artmeets the heatof the street

Weeding out misunderstandings of marijuana use

DAGGA – A SHORT HISTORY

HAZEL CRAMPTONJacana

Vivien

Horler

Michael

Morris

Artful

Ivor

Powell

Graphic Point

It is 23 years since Anton Kannemeyer and then-sidekick Conrad Botes first scandalised readerswith the in-your-face, risqué satire that was the hallmark of ‘Bitterkomix’, their core publication.Brutal and unflinching in its telling of truth, this graphic art held up a mirror that, althoughshocking and shameful in what it revealed, remained all too recognisable to South Africans.