28
[This space left intentionally blank]

[This space left intentionally blank]

  • Upload
    otylia

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

[This space left intentionally blank]. Is a sum of random waves a good model of the internal wave field?. or, an informal look at non-stationarity. Murray Levine. where. independent random variables. u. time. u-spectrum. frequency. Interesting information - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: [This space left intentionally blank]

[This space left intentionally blank]

Page 2: [This space left intentionally blank]
Page 3: [This space left intentionally blank]
Page 4: [This space left intentionally blank]
Page 5: [This space left intentionally blank]

Is a sum of random waves a good model of the internal wave field?

Murray Levine

cos( )n n nn

u A t

independent random variables

or, an informal look at non-stationarity

n nA where

Page 6: [This space left intentionally blank]

time

u

Page 7: [This space left intentionally blank]

frequency

u-sp

ectr

um

Page 8: [This space left intentionally blank]

Interesting information in the modulations?

Page 9: [This space left intentionally blank]

frequency

u-sp

ectr

um

Page 10: [This space left intentionally blank]

Random phase

time

u

Page 11: [This space left intentionally blank]

time

u

Page 12: [This space left intentionally blank]

time

u-sp

ectr

umHigh frequency Band

Page 13: [This space left intentionally blank]

time

u

Random phase

Page 14: [This space left intentionally blank]

High frequency Bandu-

spec

trum

time

Page 15: [This space left intentionally blank]

So, look for the modulation of spectral bands…

Are the modulations consistent with the random wave model?

Use data from the Ocean Storms experiment

Moored ObservationsNE Pacific Ocean 47deg 25’N, 139 deg 18’W1987-88

Page 16: [This space left intentionally blank]

10-1

100

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

Frequency, cph0.1 1

Ocean Storms194 m

u-sp

ectr

um

-2

10 month time series

Page 17: [This space left intentionally blank]

time, days

u-sp

ectr

um

0 300

Ocean Storms194 m

0.1 cph0.5 cph1.2 cph

Spectrum as function of t, S(t)

Page 18: [This space left intentionally blank]

Ocean Storms194 m

0.1 cph0.5 cph1.2 cph

Spectrum of S(t)

frequency1/(300 days) 1/(10 days)

Page 19: [This space left intentionally blank]

Ocean Storms2000 m

time, days 3000

u-sp

ectr

um0.1 cph0.5 cph

Spectrum as function of t, S(t)

Page 20: [This space left intentionally blank]

Ocean Storms2000 m

u-sp

ectr

um0.1 cph0.5 cph

Spectrum of S(t)

frequency1/(300 days) 1/(10 days)

Page 21: [This space left intentionally blank]

Spectrum as function of t, S(t)RandomModel

time, days 3000

u-sp

ectr

um0.1 cph0.5 cph1.2 cph

Page 22: [This space left intentionally blank]

Spectrum of S(t)

frequency

RandomModel

1/(10 days)1/(300 days)

0.1 cph0.5 cph1.2 cph

Page 23: [This space left intentionally blank]
Page 24: [This space left intentionally blank]
Page 25: [This space left intentionally blank]
Page 26: [This space left intentionally blank]

frequency

u-sp

ectr

um

Page 27: [This space left intentionally blank]

u

time

Another Random phase

Page 28: [This space left intentionally blank]

So, is the internal wave field look like this random phase model?

Ie is each freq band treated this way Or is there information in the modulations, ie the non-stationary part

To investigate this idea a bit further use data from Ocean Storms experiment

Open NE pacific, 1987-88, 47deg 25’N 139 deg 18’W

So, Look at time varying spectra and see if random phase works.Ie, similar question: can we generate a realisitic iw field by random phase?Or stated another way: is there information about the wave field in these modulations

Break up the spectrum into bins