Upload
thiodore-maitre
View
107
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Thomas Bourdel, Julien Cubizolles , Lev Khaykovich, Frédéric Chevy, Jing Zhang, Martin Teichmann, Servaas Kokkelmans,
Christophe Salomon
Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris,Séminaire interne, Janvier, 2004
Collège de France
Condensate of Fermionic Lithium DimersCondensate of Fermionic Lithium Dimers
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
X
Op
tica
l de
nsi
ty
Position [mm]
Y
OutlineOutline
• Formation and detection of molecules• Cooling to condensation• Condensates
– Double structure– Comparaison with other molecular condensates– Some more proofs of condensation– Condensates in very anisotropic traps– An ellipticity study
How to form molecules ?How to form molecules ?
• Sympathetic cooling of fermions by evaporation of bosons• Transfer into the optical trap
• Hyperfine transfer by RF adiabatic passage• Increase of the magnetic field to 1060 Gauss• Mixture: ½ Zeeman Transfer by RF sweep on
resonance• (Evaporation by lowering the trap intensity)• Slow crossing of the Feshbach resonance• (Further evaporation)• Detection
How to detect dimer formation ?How to detect dimer formation ?
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0
-200
-100
0
100
200
scat
terin
g le
ngth
[nm
]Magnetic field [kG]
1,3
2
4
Double ramp method :
For the probe laser to be on resonance, the magnetic field needs to be turned off. The unbrocken dimers are not detected.
232 NNNmol
1 B B
B
dE E
E dt
Importance of the ramp speedAdiabaticity:
a>0
a<0
Temperature effectsTemperature effects
The cooler, the more molecules,Independant of ramp speed
Creating molecules is heating
The molecules are likely to be in thermal and chemical equilibrium with the atoms
Evaporative cooling to condensation ?Evaporative cooling to condensation ?
• Very high collision rates– Elastic collision rate– Three body recombinaison rate
• Long Lifetimes close to resonance
• Evaporation with a<0 (D. Jin) or with a>0 (R. Grimm, W. Ketterle)
= 0.5 s = 20 ms
a = 78 nm a = 35 nm
How to directly detect molecules ?How to directly detect molecules ?
• Low binding energy: It is possible to brake the molecules with a fast magnetic field sweep– When breaking the molecules, some extra energy is released
• High field imaging• RF dissociation of molecules during TOF
– Detection of molecules only
• Increase B during TOF before breaking molecules while going to B=0
Optical trap off Compensation coils off
Pinchcoils off
Detection at low field
0.8 ms
0.2 ms
0.2 ms
Fermion evaporationFermion evaporation
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
Opt
ical
den
sity
Position [mm]-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
Position [mm]
Opt
ical
den
sity
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1Position [mm]
Opt
ical
den
sity
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1Position [mm]
Op
tica
l de
nsi
ty
TG=10.5 K
TF =12 KTG/TF =0.87
TG=3.1 K
TF =5.7 KTG/TF =0.54
TG=1.7 K
TF =3.7 KTG/TF =0.46
TG=1 K
TF =2.5 KTG/TF =0.4
TOF=0.35msN=10^5=4 kHz
TOF=0.35 msN=7.10^4=2.7 kHz
TOF=1 msN=5.10^4=1.6 kHz
TOF=1 msN=5.10^4=1.1 kHz
Double structureDouble structure
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
X
Opt
ical
den
sity
Position [mm]
Y
Gaussian fit on the wings in X: Tat=0.55 K, Tmol=1.1 K
Gaussian fit in Y: Tat=0.55 K, Tmol=1.1 K
K, for amm=120 nm, and 2 10^3 condensed molecules
Tc=1.2 K for 1.5 10^4 molecules
N=4.5 10^4 atoms=1.1 kHz
2 dimension bimodal fit 2 dimension bimodal fit
No structure in Y direction
Proof of condensationProof of condensation
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
X
position [mm]
Opt
ica
l den
sity
Y
-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
Opt
ical
den
sity
position [mm]
X
Y
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
X
Opt
ical
den
sity
position [mm]
Y
TOF=0.8 ms (with field)+0.2 ms (B up)+0.2 ms (B off)
Fermions @ 950 GEvaporation to 0.1
Atoms+Mol @ 770 GEvaporation to 0.1 Molecular Fraction>0.5
Atoms +Mol @ 770 GEvaporation to 0.2
Condensates of moleculesCondensates of molecules
• D. Jin (JILA)
• R. Grimm (Innsbruck)• W. Ketterle (MIT)
• ENS
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
X
Opt
ical
den
sity
Position [mm]
Y
Very anisotropic trap @ 770 GVery anisotropic trap @ 770 G
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
Opt
ical
den
sity
X
X [mm]
Y
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15X [mm]
Opt
ical
den
sity
Evaporation only on verticalFrequencies: 5 kHz, 650 Hz=.5 kHz
Fit: RF=31 m
Calcul: RF=20 m
Evaporation only on horizontalFrequencies: 1.25 kHz, 2.4 kHz=2.0 kHz
Ellipticity study as a fonction of fieldEllipticity study as a fonction of field
750 800 850 900 9500.02
0.03
0.04
Clo
ud s
ize
in X
and
Y [m
m]
Magnetic field (Gauss)
sigmaX sigmaY
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
sca
tterin
g le
ngth
(nm
)
sc. length
Double structures ?Double structures ?
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1position [mm]
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
Double structures ?Double structures ?
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1position [mm]
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
-0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1
770 G
954 G
874 G
848 G
822 G
808 G
795 G
782 G
770 G
ConclusionsConclusions
• Careful check of the number of remaining atoms• Lifetime of the condensate• Study of the value of Tc• Evaporation toward a pure condensate• Decrease B to lower value, (decrease |a|)• Coming back to the Fermion side
– Ellipticity as a function of degeneracy (a new thermometer)– BCS …
High field imagingHigh field imaging
Which transition are we using ?The detuning is of the order of 400-600 MHz in the region of interest.A double pass AOM at 225 MHz is added on the probe beam.
1.5 10^5atomes
Thermodynamics of atom-molecule mixtureThermodynamics of atom-molecule mixture
• 3 relevant energy scales: Eb, T, , 2 parameters
• Equilibrium:
mol=2 at+|Eb|
Tat = Tmol
Simple Formulas
]]Exp[ PolyLog[3,)(
13
N
]]Exp[ PolyLog[4,)(
33
E
]]Exp[ PolyLog[4,24]]Exp[ ,6PolyLog[4)(
3B
kS
Condensat to be
added when mol=0
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 2 4 6 8 100
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Thermodynamic resultsThermodynamic results
-8 -6 -4 -2 00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
cond
ensa
te fr
actio
n (d
ashe
d)
Eb [TF
0]
mol
ecul
ar fr
actio
n (s
olid
)
-8 -6 -4 -2 00.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
TC
Eb [TF
0]
Tem
pera
ture
[TF
0 ]
Eb/T=cst
T/Tc
T/Tc
0
5
10
0
Optical trap transfer problemOptical trap transfer problem
• The three directions of the trap are decoupled in the Hamiltonian:
• With spin polarised fermions, no collision, no adiabatic transformation of the trap possible.
HzHyHxH 222
21
21 xmmvHx xx
Images apres transfer, apres augmentation du champ, apres Ze transfert
Condensat avec a réglableCondensat avec a réglable
Evaporation à a = 2.5 nm en baissant profondeur du piège optique en 250 ms
-0,7 -0,6 -0,5 -0,4 -0,3 -0,2 -0,1 0,0 0,1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
dens
ité o
ptiq
ue in
tégr
é [u
. arb
.]
axial distance [mm]
Image en temps de vol:
N =4 10T/TC=0.8
4
Breaking a moleculeBreaking a molecule
• Shift of resonance? Bpeak = 855 +- 53 Gauss unlikely!
• Three-body recombination [D. Petrov, PRA 67, 010703 (2003)]– Molecules form efficiently in highest weakly bound state
2
2
maEB
Molecules can be trapped!
+EB
Binding energy released
EB < Etrap
EB > Etrap
Particles stay in trap
Trap loss
1( ) ( 2 ) exp( / )r r a r a
Notre terrain de jeuxNotre terrain de jeux
E |2,+2>
140 G B
|1 ,-1>
|1,+1>
Lithium bosonique (7Li)
|3/2,+3/2>
|1/2,-1/2>
|1/2,+1/2>
27 G B
Lithium fermionique (6Li)
a = - 1.4 nm = 1 b
{ a = + 2.1 nm6,7
= 1 b{
a = + 0.27 nm = 1/2 b
{ 6,7a = + 2.0 nm = 1/3 b
{ = -1/2 b
{
Le piège dipolaireLe piège dipolaire
Cols ~ 25mFréquences ~ 2.5 kHz
La résonance de FeshbachLa résonance de Feshbach
0 500 1000 1500-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Sca
tterin
g le
ngth
[nm
]
B [Gauss]ÉvaporationGaz idéalLongueur de diffusion a < 0
x
y
z350 m
a b
intkintot l pota E EE E
kr inE E
Images en temps de vol
a) Expansion sans champ
b) Expansion avec champ
Énergie du gaz piégé
intkinrE EE Eint< 0
Mesure du gaz en interactionMesure du gaz en interaction
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-200
-100
0
100
200
scat
terin
g le
ngth
[nm
]
Magnetic field [kG]
M. Houbiers, H. Stoof, V. Venturi,C. Williams, S. Kokkelmans
a = 0 at 530(3) Gaussmauvaise évaporationUniv.Innsbruck: S. Jochim et al.Duke Univ. O’Hara et al.
Pertes à 680GaussMIT, K. Dieckmann et al.
Résonnance Feshbach très fine à 550 G.
Résonance entre les états: |1/2, +1/2 >, |entre les états: |1/2, +1/2 >, |1/2, -1/2 >1/2, -1/2 >
Résonance entre les états: |1/2, +1/2 >, |entre les états: |1/2, +1/2 >, |1/2, -1/2 >1/2, -1/2 >
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
30
35
40
45
rx
ry
G
auss
ian
size
[m
]
Magnetic field [kG]
a
b
40
45
50
55
B=0Expansion isotrope
B≠0Asymétrie de l’expansion, maximum à B= 800 Gauss
Mélange de fermions préparé à1060 Gauss à T/TF = 0.6105 atoms; a < 0 : no atom loss
Au delà de résonanceAu delà de résonance
35
40
45
50
55
60
ato
m n
um
ber
[10 ]
gauss
ian
size
[m
]
4
a
b
c
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900
12345678
550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900
12345678
magnetic field [Gauss]
Mélange préparé à560 Gauss à T/TF=0.67 104 atomes; a > 0 Pertes liées à un chauffage
Perte maximum: 720 Gaussi.e 120 Gauss en dessous de laposition de la résonance prédite!
Chauffage
Le plus anisotrope vers 800 G
La résonance ??La résonance ??
600 700 800 900 1000
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6E
int/E
kin
Magnetic field [G]
Effet des molécules ?
Énergie d’interactionÉnergie d’interaction