View
218
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Time & Fractal
Vasil Penchev, Assoc. Prof., Institute for philosophical research
of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
[email protected] publication (where this
report is posted):vasil7penchev.wordpress.com
1. According quantum information, a physical meaning has not only 2, but the -function itself.
2. Two ways to describe a physical object exist: from the object to the whole (i.e. as moving object in space time, from the whole to the object (i.e. as a concrete asymmetry of a fractal structure representing the whole).
Five theses:
3. -function represents such a concrete asym-metry of a fractal structure in space-time.
4. Physical quantity representing a linear and Hermitian operator in Hilbert space (i.e. 12 transformation) means some move-ment of an object in space-time expressed by means of a change of its definitive asymmetry with regards to the whole.
5. Being of the physical quantity is information.
And the rest three theses:
The meaning of the report
One of the most difficult problems of the philosophy of physics:
ontological compatibilty of relativity and quantum mechanics
The first one is a local theory, the second is a global one.
For example, compatibility of:
• Relativity:
World line
Time
From a part to
the whole
Constancy
Actuality
• Quantum mechanics:
-function
? Fractal structure?
From the whole to a part
Probability
Virtuality
Building Up of:
World line:
point by point
- any point is a moment of time
from a part (here and now) to the whole as deve-lopment in time
-function:
level by level
- any level is a level of fractal structure
from the whole (here
and now), the 1st le-vel, to the part as
‘th’ level
Meaning of:
• Function of time
Time – t
E = m.c2
d = ict + r
• Fractal structure
Frequency = t-1
E = ħ.d = iE+cp
dA = ds.dE = 0, i.e ‘time “” fractal’
dA = ds.dE = 0, i.e. ‘time “”fractal’2.
(1)
What may it mean for a part not to be ‘’ to the whole?
• a part
an element
• the whole
the set
a: a {a} = a
a: a {a} =
a:1 : (0,1), :0,1 ‘’, ‘’
About
• Constancy: • Probability:
So probability isa relationbetween ‘part’
and ‘whole’
So constancy convertsinto a special case of the relation ofprobability, i.e the relation of‘part’ and ‘whole”
Any element:
• represents the whole as identity of the levels of fractal similarity
• This is the basis of a vector space
(for example Hil-bert space)
• represents it it-self as differen-ce (deflection) between the levels
This is an element of a vector space
So any motion as a relation between two elements may be represented by:• change of the ba-
sis of the vector space (i.e. covari-
ant change)
• change of the ele-ment of the vector space (i.e. contra-
variant change)
Relativity: no experience might differ anyway change of the basis from chan-
ge of the element
From “special” to “general” relativity:
Any motion “by itself” represents a change of a vector space. The simplest special case is then
when the vector space is “flat”: thevector space coincides with its
conjugate space (for example Riesz theorem)
More about that simplest special case:More about that simplest special case:
Any part is independent of the whole, to which ‘belongs’. We mayalso say that the whole is always the same. That’s way the relation
between ‘whole’ and ‘part’ is equal to some property of the part
The simplest special case aboutsubjective and objective probability
• Subjective probability:
waiting for the future
• Objective probability:
experiencing the past
They are if and only if : 1) any future event is independent of any past event;
2) present is but a point
Present is curvature of time!• subjective proba-
bility
• waiting
• objective proba-bility
• experiencing
The “length” of present is the measureof time curvature! This time length is
period of de Broglie’s wave, so it is inversely of mass: the macro-world is
already “timely flat”!
Now about: whether any future event is independent of any past one?
• The future event repeats merely the preceding
• The future event is absolutely independent of any past one
The future event may be causally conditioned by any past one!
Get started a new comprehension of
causality!• Fractal
repetition• Absolute indepen-
dence of future from past (Markov chain)
Causality represented by implicationModel:
Cause ‘0’ ‘0’ ‘1’ ‘1’Effect ‘0’ ‘1’ ‘0’ ‘1’
Causality ‘1’ ‘1’ ‘0’ ‘1’
AB (AB) (A)
• a fractal part:
effect repeats ‘fractally’ cause
• a Markov part:
effect is absolutely
independent of cause
Probabilistic causality means:
Cause causes effect withsome probability ‘p’: AIf cause is available, then
effect is available with probability p. If p = 1:
classical causality; if p=0:A, B are absolutely independent
Which would the difference
between correlation and probabilistic causality
be?• Correlation pre-
suposes that there is a real ‘true’ a real ‘true’ causecause, which is a hidden (compare
with ‘hidden parameter’)
• Probabilistic causality excludes
such a real ‘true”a real ‘true”
causecause
Explaining by Venn
diagrams
• A correlates with B• A causes B ‘probabilistically’
It means for us to reject:
Then ‘probabilistic causality’ means the following:
• The universal setbeing common for
both A, B doesn’texist. We may
think that they belong to two different univer-sal sets
• We may also think that the universal
set changes: t1t2
(AUt1 )
(BUt2
)So some elementsof A may disappear,but new elementsmay appear in B
Returning to classic causality…
• The whole is the same
• Time is Newton one
• Energy is conserved
• Correlation requires for a hidden cause to exist
• Allareequal
Returning back to probabilistic Returning back to probabilistic causality…causality…
• The whole is not the same
• Time is not Newton one
• Energy is not con-served
• There are correla-tions, but there aren’t hidden parameters
This is theThis is the
Realm ofRealm of
quantumquantum
mechanicsmechanics
and infor-and infor-
mationmation
Probabilistic causality generalizes per se… relativity
Now: no diffe-rence whether any part or the whole changes
Probabilistic
causality means
relativity of whole and part
Generalized relativity presupposes that motion of whole and motion of part
are equivalentWe know much
about the motion of
part. What about the motion of whole?
It means change of a frac-tal structure into another. That is not a change in time. Heidegger has spoken of history of being
We would be able to comprehend
‘history of being’ as ‘change of whole’
• On the one hand,
we may think
‘history of being’
as Plato’s eons
changing each other in millenniums
• On the other hand, better to think for
‘history of being’ to be as Braudel’s Braudel’s long run [la longuelong run [la longue
durduréée] e]
From our, human point From our, human point of view…of view…
And now: an unexpected comparison… with the math definition of info:
I=f(t) ln (t) .dt
I=f(t) ln (t) .dt
f(t)– a slow change, long run(t) – an usual run of time
ln – slows down (t) to f(t)
I=f(t) ln (t) .dt – a measureof slow change, of long run
Sat sapienti (a hint in future)
• The function of ln transforms
multiplicative (fast) groups into additive (slow) groups, so a field into a (double) group
• The function of ln transforms an axis of Hilbert space into an inertial reference frame, so a point of it into a world line
Two points of view:Two points of view:1. From the whole -
the motion is motion of whole. So any physical quantity is a li-near (Hermitian) transformation of the whole – in quantum mechanics
2. From the part: the motion is motion of part. So any physical quantity is a linear transformation of part’s world line – in relativity
The concept of (quantum) The concept of (quantum) information units both of information units both of
themthemA= (x) F [*(x)] .dx
I= World line (t).ln (t).dt
Any physical quantity in QMF: (x) F [*(x)] is a trans-formation of the whole – the measuring instrument
More about: I= W (t).ln (t).dt
Granted F: ln (t) = Force{W (-t)}
Full analogy:
Operatorin QM, F
Classical forceacting ‘now’, F
(x) F [*(x)] .dx W (t). F{W(-t)}.dtPhysical quantity
AIInformation of motion I
A general principle in two A general principle in two forms:forms:
• Expressed by the motion of whole:
Quantum mechanics
OperatorPhysical quantity
Reality as virtuality
• Expressed by the motion of part:
Relativity
Force
Motion information
Reality as actuality
A basic idea of the report: A basic idea of the report:A basic idea of the report:
No Already Boundary – since 1989’s falling the wall!
Two ways to describe a physical object exist:
• TA way is: from the object to the whole – as a moving object in space-time
• AAnother way is: from the whole to the object – as a concrete asymmetry of a fractal structure representing the whole
-function represents such a concrete asymmetry of a fractal
structure in space-time
Physical quantity means some motion of an object in space-time
expressed by means of a change of its definitive asymmetry with regards to
the whole
Being of the physical quantity is information