Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2018 JETIR June 2018, Volume 5, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIRC006021 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research(JETIR)www.jetir.org 114
TO STUDY THE EFFECT OF CANTED ANGLE
IN TURBULENCE MIXING IN SUPERSONIC
TWIN JET
1Jubin Shaji, 2Mubarak A.K. 1 PG Student, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering , Government Engineering, College Thrissur, Kerala, India
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering , Government Engineering, College Thrissur, Kerala, India
ABSTRACT-The pressing environmental issue of modern public is jet noise. Air travel is becoming common and affordable
globally. The airport authority set endurable limits of jet noise near airports. The review paper concentrate on twin jet interaction,
aeroacoustics and fluid flow physics. The computational and experimental investigation on supersonic jet noise is discussed;
consist of turbulent mixing noise, screech tones and broadband noise. CFD 2D simulation of axisymmetric converging diverging
nozzles of Mach number of 1.76 and canted twin jet has lower turbulence level due to jet interaction in the inter nozzle region.
The main objective of this study is to compare the jet structure, turbulence quantities of twinjets and the effect of canted angle in
turbulence mixing in supersonic twinjet.
KEYWORDS-Canted twinjet, supersonic nozzle, jet noise, twin jet, Axisymmetric converging diverging nozzles,potential core
length, jet interaction, Acoustic shielding
INTRODUCTION Canted nozzle from the basic definition has the meaning of a nozzle positioned so that its line of thrust is not parallel to the
direction of flight. The methods to lower turbulence in a nozzle is an active area of research. Greatrex and Brown [1958] put the
use of twinjets as a configuration to reduce jet noise. They found that two parallel co-planar jets placed sufficiently far apart to
avoid any interaction between the jets resulted in less noise radiation in the plane containing the axis of the jets than that
measured perpendicular to it. This phenomenon is called acoustic shielding.
Earlier research in twinjet, Lower turbulence levels were observed as compared to a single jet. The turbulence in the inter
nozzle region of the canted twin jets was significantly reduced due to increased jet interaction. The twin jet configuration leads to
reduction in sound pressure levels. This reduction in jet noise was attributed to two separate aeroacoustic phenomena. First is the
reduction due to acoustic shielding, where noise from one jet is suppressed in the sideline direction by the other jet. Second is the
reduction in noise due to increased jet interaction leading to reduced turbulence in the inter-nozzle region.
Raman panickar and chelliah[1] done a review on history of twinjet coupling, nozzle spacing, fatigue failure of components
due to dynamic pressure build up in inter nozzle region. To overcome above problems various techniques were employed.A
detailed review on twin rectangular supersonic jets and twin jet noise suppression was discussed.
R. W. Wlezien[2] studied jet interaction on various geometry and found that The noise produced by interaction of two
supersonic plumes is a strong function of nozzle spacing and jet Mach number.Yin zhao-qin[3] conducted a experimental work
related to the mixing region of twin jets and made a conclusion that the interference between the two jets increases as the spacing
between two nozzles decrease. The commercial computational fluid dynamic software packages have been widely accepted as a
research tool for jet interaction simulation. Sandeep yerapotina[4] studied the jet interaction between single and twin jet and their
acoustics characteristics K.M. Pandey et al[5] conducted simulation for multiple jet intraction in 2D using CFD softwareLater
2016 Justin D. Valentiet al[6] done simulation of dual jet flow using CFD software (StarCCM+ by CDAdapco).In this simulation
adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) approach was used. andVarious turbulence model were studied, compared with experimental
results. The twin jet CFD 2D simulation is done to compare the jet structure, turbulence quantities of twinjets and the effect of
canted angle in turbulence mixing in supersonic twinjet.
NOZZLE GEOMETRY AND COMPUTATIONAL DOMAIN
The CFD simulation of twinjet is carried out in axisymmetric converging diverging with exit diameter (d) of 21.3 mm. the exit
to throat area ratio for all the nozzle was 1.4, yielding a design
FIGURE 1:Schematic diagram of straight (left) and canted (right) twinjet
© 2018 JETIR June 2018, Volume 5, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIRC006021 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research(JETIR)www.jetir.org 115
mach number of 1.76. the spacing(s) between the twin nozzle is 37.3 mm or 1.75d. the converging angle is 350 and diverging
angle 50. The inlet pressure and temperature is 370000 Pa and 350F. The symmetry conditions where taken on opposite side of
the domain.
FIGURE 2:Computational domain
NUMERICAL METHODOLOGY
The fluent software employs finite volume based numerical method to solve the physics laws governing the flow through
nozzle. The mathematical equation that represent the physical laws, namely continuity equation, momentum equation, energy
equation and turbulence equation, are solved numerically along with appropriate constitute relation.
Continuity Equation 𝜕𝜌
𝜕𝑡+ 𝛻 ∙ (𝜌𝑢) = 0
Momentum Equation
𝜌𝜕𝑢
𝜕𝑡+ 𝜌𝑢. ∇𝑢 = −∇𝑝 + ∇ ∙ 𝜏 + 𝜌𝑓𝑥
Energy Equation
𝜌𝜕𝑒
𝜕𝑡+ 𝜌𝑢. ∇𝑒 = −𝑝∇ ∙ 𝑢 − ∇ ∙ 𝑞 + 𝜏: ∇𝑢 + 𝜌�̇�
In the above equations [8], ρ is the mass density; u is the velocity vector; p is the pressure; fk is the body force. In this study,
the turbulence is modeled using the k-ω sst turbulence model and the transport equations of turbulent kinetic energy, k and its
dissipation rate, ε are also solved along with aforementioned governing equations. The transport equations of k and ω are not
shown here for brevity.
COMPUTATIONAL MESH AND MESH STUDIES
A 2D computational mesh generated by ANSYS ICEM CFD applied to the axisymmetric converging-diverging nozzle. In
order to get mesh independent results a grid independency study is done are given in table 1
TABLE 1:Grid independency
Mesh No. Cell Velocity at exit
1 922600 434.6
2 752800 434.2
3 567895 430
Richardson Extrapolation methodused for grid independency study and Grid Convergence Index is 0.0001387589. the mesh
number 2 is used for study.
VALIDATION
Axis symmetric convergent divergent twinjet nozzle is validated [1] and found percentage error of
© 2018 JETIR June 2018, Volume 5, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIRC006021 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research(JETIR)www.jetir.org 116
FIGURE 3:Validation of twin nozzle
6.04.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
(a) Velocity Distributions
The centre line velocity for axis symmetric twinjet and canted twinjet is shown in figure 4. Twinjet with canted angle
6,08,0100is plotted from results we can find canting of angle decreases the turbulence level. The turbulence level in the inter
region of the twin jets (canted) was significantly reduced due to increased jet interaction.
FIGURE 4:Center line velocity
the contour plot ofcenter line velocityshows the mean axial velocity. While canting thre twin jet the potential core of the exit
of the nozzle decreases. Shock cell structure is clearly seen. The structure of the jet exit is now elliptical. In twin jet we can see
that the separate single jet exit is now converging into simple jet.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 5 10 15 20 25
u/U
j
x/d
Center Line velocity
Numerical
experimental
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 5 10 15 20 25
u/U
j
x/d
Center line velocity
TWIN JET
CANTED ANGLE 8
CANTED ANGLE 10
CANTED TWINJET 6
© 2018 JETIR June 2018, Volume 5, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIRC006021 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research(JETIR)www.jetir.org 117
FIGURE5: Velocity contour
(b) Turbulence Quantities
FIGURE6: Turbulence intensity
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0 5 10 15 20
u/U
j
x/d
Trbulence Intencity
CANTED ANGLE 6
TWINJET
CANTED ANGLE 8
CANTED ANGLE10
© 2018 JETIR June 2018, Volume 5, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162)
JETIRC006021 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research(JETIR)www.jetir.org 118
FIGURE7: Turbulence intensity contour
Axial fluctuating velocity, u′/Uj vs diameter length Dis plotted in figure 6 were the turbulence intensity is seen decreasing as
the angle of canting is increased. Spacing ratio decreased between jets. The figure 7 shows contour of turbulence intensity were
lower turbulence level were found due to canting.
CONCLUSION
As the canting of twinjet is done the potential core length decreased between the jet. As the turbulence level lowers which
leads to lower noise levels due to acoustics shielding. the jet structure, turbulence quantities of twinjets and the effect of canted
angle in turbulence mixing in supersonic twinjet is studied. As canting of the jet in a practical case is much to be studied but
implementation can be more helpful for maintaining the regulation done by the various international bodies.
REFERENCES [1] Ganesh Raman, Praveen Panickar, Kanthasamychelliah“ Aeroacoustics of twin supersonic jets: a review” (2012), pp 957-
984.
[2] R. W. Wlezien, “Nozzle Geometry Effects on Supersonic Jet Interaction” ,AIAA Journal vol 27, (1989), pp 1361-1367.
[3] Yin Zhao-qin, “Experimental Study on the Flow Field Characteristics in the Mixing Region of Twin Jets” Science Direct
journal of hydrodynamics ,(2007) pp. 309-313.
[4] Sandeep Yerapotina, “Aeroacoustic Characteristics of Supersonic Twin Jets” Florida state university (2005), pp 1-72.
[5] K. M. Pandey, Virendra Kumar, Prateek Srivastava, “CFD Analysis of Twin Jet Supersonic Flow With Fluent Software”
Current Trends in Technology and Sciences, (2012), pp 84-91.
[6] Justin D. Valenti, Melissa Fronzeo “A Validation Effort of Dual Jet Flow Simulations” AIAA (2016) pp 1-15.