20
Health Care Strategy - the Simplot Journey Idaho State Employee Group Insurance and Benefits Committee- October 7, 2016 Aleasha Eberly J.R. Simplot Company, Compensation and Benefits Specialist

Today‟s agenda - Idaho Legislature · • All plan sponsors should evaluate implications of ACA – Compliance requirements and potential pitfalls – Strategic opportunities –

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Health Care Strategy - the

Simplot Journey

Idaho State Employee Group Insurance and Benefits Committee- October 7, 2016

Aleasha Eberly – J.R. Simplot Company, Compensation and Benefits

Specialist

2 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Today‟s agenda

• Why Simplot made changes?

• How did we go about it?

• What has been the outcome of the change?

• What lessons did we learn?

• What else can we share with you from our journey?

3 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Why changes for Simplot?

• Grandfathered status could no longer be affordably maintained

• Non-grandfathered status would bring additional cost to the plan

• The Company desire to maintain a 70/30 cost balance was

unbalanced; achieving that balance within the existing plan design

would cause significant cost increase to employees

• Needed an approach that would lower the overall employee and

Simplot cost long-term

• Wanted to position ourselves for future health care industry changes

The time was right for fundamental change.

4 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

How did we go about it?

• Executive involvement

– Guiding principles

– Periodic updates

– Review of two alternative approaches

• Project team

– Included a cross-section of HR representatives

• Support from external consultant

– Bring us new thinking

– Industry

– Expertise in analysis

5 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

What did we want to accomplish?

6 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Why a high deductible health plan

(HDHP)? (aka „Account Based‟ ABHP or „Consumer Driven‟

CDHP)

• HDHP’s are becoming more common

• Affordable entry

• Consumption behavior is reevaluated

When designing the plan, consideration was given to

• Deductible, and

• OOP max

7 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Why go full replacement?

• Resistance to change

• Consistent with administrative strategy

• Consistent with industry trend

• Willingness to help employees with the change

8 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

What did the design look like?

9 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

What was employee reaction?

10 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

What has been the impact of the change?

11 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

What has been the impact of the change?

12 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

What were our top seven learnings?

1) Communication – early, often and in a variety of ways

2) Strong vendor partnerships and new tools

3) Generous HSA contribution important to transition

4) Expect lots of noise from pharmacy

5) Aggregate family deductible is hard

6) Plan for the transition of your FSA to an HSA

7) Recognize that it is complex and will take time

13 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

What else can we share with

you from our journey?

14 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Appendix

15 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

The “cost squeeze” of Health Care

Reform

40% Excise Tax Cap Ceiling ($10,200/$27,500)

Minimum plan of 60% actuarial value and

affordable to employees

Manage cost trend

Improve workforce health

Reduce risk factors

Optimize vendor performance

Manage high-cost claim risk

Minimize non-core benefits

2014

2018

Plan design needs to

be high enough to

avoid penalties

Plan value needs to be

low enough to avoid

the excise tax

Plan costs need to be

minimized, while still

attracting and

retaining employees

16 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Reasons to revisit health care

strategy • Health care delivery and the employer role in providing coverage is

undergoing significant change — Nearly 50% of employers expect to

make significant or transformative change to their health care

strategy by 2018(1)

• All plan sponsors should evaluate implications of ACA

– Compliance requirements and potential pitfalls

– Strategic opportunities

– Short-term and long-term financial implications

• ACA is only part of the story

– Health care delivery system transformation is underway, but progress varies

widely in markets around the U.S.

– Public and private benefit exchanges are emerging

• Unrealized opportunity to engage employees in their health

(1) Source: 2013 Towers Watson/National Business Group on Health Employer Survey on Purchasing Value in Health Care

17 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Plan to change health and pharmacy plan design as

most important priority in the next 3 years

Anticipate adopting spousal surcharge, compared to

27% today

Structure employee contributions based on employees

taking specific actions

Currently use defined contribution strategies,

expected to double by 2018

#1 Priority is to evaluate health and pharmacy plan design strategy

Employers take aggressive action

80%

60%

40%

20%

Source: 2015 Towers Watson/NBGH Best Practices in Health Care Employer Survey

18 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Adoption of ABHP nears universal use

And full-replacement ABHP continues to grow

8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 15.0% 20.0%

25.0% 26.0%

34.0%

43.0%

4.9% 5.4% 5.0% 5.4% 7.6%

10.7% 12.5% 15.4%

21.3% 23.9%

33%

39%

47% 51%

54% 53% 59%

66%

73%

82%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Median ABHP enrollment Percentage with 100% enrollment

Percentage offer an ABHP

Note: Enrollment rates are based on companies that offer an ABHP in various years. 2006 is based on the 12th Annual Towers

Watson/National Business Group on Health survey; 2007 is based on the 13th annual survey, etc.

86% by 2016

Source: 2015 Towers Watson/NBGH Best Practices in Health Care Employer Survey

19 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Project approach: “Six views” to evaluate

strategy

Employer View

Simplot’s objectives?

Financial View

Simplot’s current and future projected

program costs? How costs are shared?

Workforce View

Current and future characteristics of

Simplot’s workforce?

Competitive Market View

How competitive are Simplot’s

programs? How is market changing?

Health View

Are there important health/risk

characteristics of Simplot’s population?

Employee View

What do employees know, need and

value?

Employee View

Financial View Employer View

Health View

Workforce View

Competitive

Market View

20 HEALTHIER TOGETHER © 2015 J.R. Simplot

Company

Introducing the new plan

• HR and Leader toolkits and meetings

• Home mailers and postcards

• Workplace posters, table tents, and brochures

• Emails

• Employee meetings

• FAQs

• Weekly blog (The Spill)

• webinars

• Internet microsite (no firewall)

• Intranet articles and resources (behind firewall)

• Vendor websites, materials, and meetings