Tone: Single versus Multiple Notes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/19/2019 Tone: Single versus Multiple Notes

    1/5

    Tone: Single versus Multiple Notes

     Tone is the quality of the sound; whether the sum total of all the properties of

    the sound is appropriate for the music. There is controversy over whether a

    pianist can control the "tone" of a single note on the piano. If you were to sit

    at the piano and play one note, it seems nearly impossible to alter the tone

    except for things like staccato, legato, loud, soft, etc. n the other hand,

    there is no question that di!erent pianists produce di!ering tones. Two

    pianists can play the same composition on the same piano and produce

    music with very di!erent tonal quality. ost of this apparent contradiction can

    be resolved by carefully de#ning what "tone" means. $or example, a large

    part of the tonal di!erences among pianists can be attributed to the

    particular pianos they use, and the way those pianos are regulated or tuned.

    %ontrolling the tone of a single note is probably &ust one aspect of a multi'

    faceted, complex issue. Therefore, the most important distinction we mustmake initially is whether we are talking about a single note or a group of

    notes. ost of the time, when we hear di!erent tones, we are listening to a

    group of notes. In that case, tone di!erences are easier to explain. Tone is

    mostly produced by the control of the notes relative to each other. This

    almost always comes down to precision, control and musical content.

     Therefore, tone is mainly a property of a group of notes and depends on the

    musical sensitivity of the pianist.

    (owever, it is also clear that we can control the tone of a single note inseveral ways. )e can control it by use of the soft and damper pedals. )e can

    also change the harmonic content *the number of overtones+ by playing

    louder or softer. The soft pedal changes the tone, or timbre, by reducing the

    prompt sound relative to the after sound. )hen a string is struck with a

    greater force, more harmonics are generated. Thus when we play softly, we

    tend to produce sound containing stronger fundamentals. (owever, below a

    certain loudness, there may be insucient energy to excite the fundamental

    and you might &ust excite some higher frequency traveling waves, somewhat

    similar to the -autando in the violin *the inertia of the strings acts like the

    #nger in the -autando+. Therefore, somewhere between and $$, there isan optimum strike force that maximi/es the fundamental. The damper pedal

    also changes the timbre by allowing vibrations at the non'struck strings.

     The tone or timbre can be controlled by the tuner by voicing the hammer or

    by tuning di!erently. 0 harder hammer produces a more brilliant tone *larger

  • 8/19/2019 Tone: Single versus Multiple Notes

    2/5

    harmonic content+ and a hammer with a -at striking area produces a harsher

    tone *more high frequency harmonics+. The tuner can change the stretch or

    control the amount of detuning among the unisons. 1p to a point, larger

    stretch tends to produce brighter music and insucient stretch can produce a

    piano with unexciting sound. )hen detuned within the sympathetic vibration

    frequency range, all strings of a note will be in perfect tune *vibrate at thesame frequency+, but will interact di!erently with each other. $or example,

    the note can be made to "sing" which may be an after sound whose volume

    wavers. 2o 3 strings are ever identical, so that the option of tuning identically

    simply does not exist.

    $inally, we come to the dicult question4 can you vary the tone of a single

    note by controlling the downstroke5 ost of the arguments over tone control

    center on the free -ight property of the hammer before it strikes the strings.

    pponents *of single note tone control+ argue that, because the hammer is infree -ight, only its velocity matters and therefore tone is not controllable for a

    note played at a speci#ed loudness. 6ut the assumption of free -ight has

    never been proven, as we shall now see. ne factor a!ecting tone is the -ex

    of the hammer shaft. $or a loud note, the shaft may be signi#cantly -exed as

    the hammer is launched into free -ight. In that case, the hammer can have a

    larger e!ective mass than its original mass when it hits the strings. This is

    because the force, $, of the hammer on the strings, is given by $ 7 a where

    is the mass of the hammer and a is its deceleration upon impact with the

    strings. ositive -ex adds an extra force because, as the -ex recovers after

    the &ack is released, it pushes the hammer forwards; when $ increases, it

    doesn8t matter if or a increases, the e!ect is the same. (owever, a is more

    dicult to measure than *for example you can easily simulate a larger by

    using a heavier hammer+ so we usually say, in this case, that the "e!ective

    mass" has increased, to make it easier to visuali/e the e!ect of the larger $

    on how the strings respond. In reality, however, positive -ex increases a. $or

    a note played staccato, the -ex may be negative by the time the hammer

    strikes the strings, so that the tone di!erence between "deep" playing and

    staccato may be considerable. These changes in e!ective mass will certainly

    change the distribution of overtones and a!ect the tone we hear. 9ince the

    shaft is not :< rigid, we know that there is always a #nite -ex. The only

    question is whether it is sucient to a!ect tone as we hear it. It almostcertainly is because the hammer shaft is a relatively -exible piece of wood. If

    this is true, then the tone of the lower notes, with the heavier hammers,

    should be more controllable because the heavier hammers will cause a larger

    -ex. 0lthough one might expect the -ex to be negligible because the hammer

    is so light, the knuckle is very close to the hammer -ange bushing, creating a

    tremendous leverage. The argument that the hammer is too light to induce

  • 8/19/2019 Tone: Single versus Multiple Notes

    3/5

  • 8/19/2019 Tone: Single versus Multiple Notes

    4/5

     This information is also critical for the piano technician. It means that the

    optimum hammer si/e is one which is suciently small so that -ex is /ero

    somewhere around , but suciently large so that -ex is signi#cant starting

    around mf. This is a very clever mechanical arrangement that allows the use

    of relatively small hammers that enable rapid repetitions and can still

    transmit a maximum amount of energy to the strings. It means that it is amistake to go to larger hammers to produce more sound because you will

    lose repetition speed and tone control. The existence of hammer shank -ex is

    now well known *"$ive >ectures on the 0coustics of the iano"+.

    %an the di!erence in tone of a single note be heard on the piano by playing

     &ust one note5 1sually not; most people are not sensitive enough to hear this

    di!erence with most pianos. ?ou will need a 9teinway 6 or better piano, and

    you may start to hear this di!erence *if you test this with several pianos of

    progressively higher quality+ with the lower notes. (owever, when actualmusic is played, the human ear is ama/ingly sensitive to how the hammer

    impacts the strings, and the di!erence in tone can be easily heard. This is

    similar to tuning4 most people *including most pianists+ will be hard pressed

    to hear the di!erence between a super tuning and an ordinary tuning by

    playing single notes or even testing intervals. (owever, practically any

    pianist can hear the di!erence in tuning quality by playing a piece of their

    favorite music. ?ou can demonstrate this yourself. lay an easy piece twice, in

    an identical way except for touch. $irst, play with arm weight and "pressing

    deeply" into the piano, making sure that the key drop accelerates all the way

    down *correct basic keystroke+. Then compare this to the music when you

    press shallowly so that there is complete key drop, but there is no

    acceleration at the bottom. ?ou may need to practice a little to make sure

    that the #rst time is not louder than the second. ?ou should hear an inferior

    tone quality for the second mode of play. In the hands of great pianists, this

    di!erence can be quite large. f course, we discussed above that tone is

    controlled most strongly by how you play successive notes, so that playing

    music to test the e!ect of single notes is clearly not the best way. (owever, it

    is the most sensitive test.

    ianissimo4 )e saw that for , you need an accurate basic key stroke, and

    rapid relaxation. $eeling the keys with the pads of the #ngers is important. In

    general, you should always practice with a soft touch until the passage is

    mastered, then add mf or $$ or whatever is needed, because playing with a

    soft touch is the most dicult skill to develop. There is no acceleration of the

    downstroke and no hammer shank -ex, but the backcheck must be controlled

    *key down and held+. (owever, the most important factors for are proper

  • 8/19/2019 Tone: Single versus Multiple Notes

    5/5

    regulation *especially minimum let'o!, hammer voicing, and correct hammer

    weight+. Trying to cultivate technique without proper piano maintenance

    is futile. In an emergency *during a performance with unsatisfactory piano+

    you might try the soft pedal with an upright or partial soft pedal with a grand.

    is dicult on most digitals because the key action is inferior and

    deteriorates quickly after about @ years of use. 6ut an acoustic that was notmaintained can be much worse.

    $ortissimo is a matter of transferring weight into the piano. This means body

    leaning forward so that the center of gravity is closer to the keyboard and

    playing from the shoulders. Ao not use only hands or arms for $$. 0gain,

    relaxation is important so that you do not waste energy, you enable

    maximum downstroke speed, and the proper force can be directed only

    where it is needed. $or a passage to be played $$, practice without the $$

    until the passage is mastered, then add $$.

    In summary, tone is primarily a result of uniformity and control of playing and

    depends on the musical sensitivity of the player. Tone control is a complex

    issue involving every factor that changes the nature of the sound and we

    have seen that there are many ways to change the piano sound. It all starts

    with how the piano is regulated. Bach pianist can control the tone by

    numerous means, such as by playing loudly or softly, or by varying the

    speed. $or example, by playing louder and faster, we can produce music

    consisting mainly of the prompt sound; conversely, a slower and softer playwill produce a subdued e!ect, using more after sound. 0nd there are

    innumerable ways in which to incorporate the pedal into your playing. )e

    saw that the tone of a single note can be controlled because the hammer

    shank has -ex. The large number of variables ensures that every pianist will

    produce a di!erent tone.

    http4CCwww.pianofundamentals.comCbookCenC:.III.:.:.3

    http://www.pianofundamentals.com/book/en/1.III.1.1.2http://www.pianofundamentals.com/book/en/1.III.1.1.2