Top British Climate Scientist Acknowledges Ongoing Geoengineering Interventions

7/24/2019 Top British Climate Scientist Acknowledges Ongoing Geoengineering Interventions

1/6

Top British Climate Scientist Acknowledges OngoingGeoengineering InterventionsBy James Hodgskiss

Global Research, October 31, 2015Chemtrails Project UK17 October 2015

Url of this article:http://www.globalresearch.ca/top-british-climate-scientist-acknowledges-ongoing-geoengineering-interventions/5485739

Professor Tim Lenton (Chair in Climate Change/Earth Systems ScienceUniversity of Exeter) provided one of the many positive outcomes of thisummers climate change conference in Paris.You may have missed this major admission from Professor Lenton which woriginally broke in our Paris Report, so we revisit it here and round off with little more discussion.His revelations occurred on day 2 of the climate change conference in Parithat ran from 7th to 10th July, 2015.

As you will see from the transcript and video excerpts, below, ProfessoLenton initially denied that geoengineering activities were already occurrinbut, when pressed further, he threw in the towel and conceded that thgeoengineering of our skies was indeed already happening.


2/6

For any newcomers to this topic, we are officially told by Her Majestys Government that geoengineering which includes releasing vast amounts of toxic substances into the sky from aircraft in a supposed bid to blockout the sun and reduce global warming is just a proposal, and that any current geoengineering experimentsare being performed only on a small scale.Transcript of Geoengineering-related DiscussionsOlga Raffa, Chemtrails Project UK:My names Olga Raffa, fromClimateChangeSense.org. I represent a large group of people who are wondering

why programmes such as weather modification and ongoing geoengineeringprogrammes throughout the World have not been taken into consideration with a lotof the research done. And we notice, on a daily basis, that our environment is beingtipped through the aerosols being dumped into the atmosphere blocking our sun. Andthere seems to be a lot of aluminium in the environment within the bees now havealuminium, and its destroying their, well, theres a bee collapse obviously with theinsects and the biodiversity. Aluminium found in whales. So we recognise this is amilitary programme. And the EMFs so youve got your cell towers, your HAARPwhich is putting heat into the atmosphere, into the ionosphere and seems to bemoving the jet streams. Have you done any research and published on the tipping points that this is doing anwill cause in the future. Thank you.

Prof. Tim Lenton, University of Exeter:Not precisely on those interventions, butam someone whos obviously worked on tipping points and also on trying to evaluat

these well, I would think of them more as proposed, existing proposals fogeoengineering inverventions either in the camp of sunlight reflection methods olarge-scale carbon removal methods. Ive been on my own journey with my thinkinabout that but, as Ive said publicly and in the literature, Im now of a view that thrisks posed by large-scale attempts to reflect sunlight back to space far outweigthe potential benefits in terms of reducing risk of higher temperatures and associatetipping points. So I still feel that theres a space for and theres a need, in fact, to looat the options for carbon removal as I think we may need that later this century. Buthats not what youre most concerned about.

The next Q&A covers another subject raised by another attendee, before the geoengineering topic is rekindleby Dr. Colin Pritchard.Dr. Colin Pritchard, University of Edinburgh:My question is again for Tim. ColinPritchard, Edinburgh University. Hi, Tim. Thank you very much for your very cogentexplanation. I would basically agree with you on geoengineering except, may I inferthat you prefer an enormous global-scale uncontrolled experiment in geoenginerringas opposed to a small-scale uncontrolled [sic] one. At the moment we are in theformer. And it seems to be a little bizarre to prefer the former to the latter.

Prof. Tim Lenton, University of Exeter: Im certainly notpreferring carrying on with our current uncontrolledexperiment. And Im not whats the right word Im notmonolithically set against things that are being discussedunder the banner of geoengineering. So its quite anuance I think thats quite a nuance discussion to have, perhaps over lunchbecause it really depends on the options youre considering. So youve got somthings which would be reflective roofs and road surfaces that are very practical, loca

adaptation options against urban heat islands that, if you did on a large enough scalecould have some measurable effect on regional climate and I think are very sensibleSo we have to just be I think we have to be nuanced on specific proposals, specifi

technologies. But I think we can perhaps all agree that certainly none of us want to continue the currenuncontrolled experiment.I guess, knowing the numbers, we realise that we would like the strongest mitigatioefforts possible but we now know that additional things including carbon removal from the atmosphere maywe may want to develop that capability because we may need it as part of the risk management portfolio.Video ExcerptLasting 4 minutes 24 seconds (if you cut out the interjecting question/answer by skipping from 1:26:16 to1:29:59), here are the above exchanges from the official footage:


3/6

Object 1

The original, full videofrom this session last 1 hour 39 minutes 43 seconds.ConclusionIts HappeningProfessor Lentons U-turn on whether geoengineering activities are alreadyunderway, although spectacular, is actually quite understandable.

Geoengineers proposing to spray aerosols from aircraft to block out the sun when the

same effects, were told, are already being achieved with ordinary condensationtrails is the ludicrous scenario currently being served up by Her MajestysGovernment (HMG) one that does not merit the vast amounts of taxpayers moneythat has already been invested in geoengineering.

It appears the fine line being walked by Professor Lenton and company is that, onone hand, they must not be seen emboldening ridiculous claims such as the ordinarycondensation trails one made by HMG but, on the other hand, trying not to bite that same hand that is feedinthem financially. I believe it is this dilemma that we witness Professor Lenton struggle with as it best explains hiinitial denial then later admission that geoengineering is already occurring.

It is reasonable, therefore, to conclude that the money received by these establishments is adversely affectingthe quality of their work. They are compromised.So too the media, creating their nonsensical pro-environmental fanfare for the IPCC as they set abou

hammering the final few nails into our New World Order coffin, with virtually no mention of the real scientists anthe real campaignerswho, with no financial incentive, continue to spread the truth about the underlyinphenomenon of global warming.Such individuals those with the intelligence, independence and decency to stand against the mainstreamdeception are ensuring that the cracks of Agenda 21and the NWO continue to progress


4/6

Object 2

until the whole system is inevitably exploited for what it is.

Its Being IgnoredThe second major issue that is confirmed for us by Professor Lenton (and aconfirmed elsewhere) is that these geoengineering activities that we now agreexist have not been taken into account in the IPCCs climate models or in othemainstream climate research.

With the warming effects that persistent aircraft trails can have on surfactemperatures already acknowledged by the IPCC but not included in their climatmodels, scientists such as Professor Lenton must realise that the geoengineerinelephant in the room must now be addressed if these scientists and their work ito emerge with any credibility whatsoever.

The question we witnessed Dr Pritchard raising was especially helpful as it ultimatelcaused Professor Lenton to concede, but one is left wondering to what extent other institutions are benefitinfrom adopting the flawed stance that the climate is changing due to human activity, but lets ignore the climatieffects of years of geoengineering.

More specifically, if UK universities are being rewarded with vast amounts of research money to facilitate thnonsense of geoengineering, then how lucrative must be the benefits of upholding the underlying globawarming alarmism that we already know to be flawed? To look at it another way, how many millions would it cos

them if they allowed the wheels to come off the global warming bandwagon? Ethics aside, it is clear why themain incentive is to promote the paired issues of global warming and geoengineering. Money talks.By way of contrast, consider the 30,000 independent US scientists (of which 9,000 had PhDs) that signed theOregon Petition:

We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that waswritten in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposedlimits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science andtechnology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or


5/6

other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophicheating of the Earths atmosphere and disruption of the Earths climate. Moreover, there issubstantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce manybeneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

With no financial motivation for these scientists, what prevailed was the opportunity for truth and transparencyNo threat required. No spotlight required.

Learn more about the global warming deception that is facilitating the geoengineering crime at our sistesite, Climate Change Sense.Theres No Way ForwardFor Professor Lenton himself, now that he has conceded geoengineering iscontributing to climate change, is he going to continue his absurdly flawed promotionof geoengineering also being a solutionto climate change?! Or will he find thenecessary resources to investigate geoengineering and chemtrailsas a causalfactorof climate change and maybe even reconsider his stance on global warming? Withno financial incentive, such a change in direction may appear unlikely but, given hisown admission, how else can his work be taken seriously?The same questions, of course, apply to all mainstream climate scientists and theIPCC, because what Professor Lentons words have done is invalidatehiswork, hisdepartments work and that of the IPCC. This is because we now have officialacceptance that geoengineering is happening and its effects are not being taken intoaccount, which is rendering the whole anthropogenic global warming claim an utter shambles.For Professor Lenton and every other climate scientist now unable to plead ignorance, without the necessarchange in direction, will their work eventually be subject to charges of fraud?We know we live in a World rife in corruption and there is no reason to presume the scientists, politicians and

journalists involved in the global warming and geoengineering scandals should be any exception to the ruleShamefully, the only sacrifice they appear willing to make is to permit the current, growing threat to their owchildren and grandchildrens physical health.

Such sacrifice appears to be made for the purpose of simply securing their own personal salaries anlivelihoods. In todays climate of financial hardship and debt, it can be understood how simply gettinthemselves over the line may be a priority for the me generation, but any assumption that their offspring maenjoy a net benefit seems especially shortsighted.

Sadly, all too often, cash isking. But if their ultimate motive does boil down to financial security, you wouldexpect these intelligent people to engage their foresight and acknowledge the imminent ramifications of beinso closely associated with and facilitating what may deservedly go down as the greatest crime of moderhistory. A crime that, by their own admission, is now unfolding before us.May this article serve as a call for these scientists to turn their attentions to the bigger picture and to changetheir course of action accordingly, so they are no longer:

Damaging the health of themselves and their own families.

Risking prosecution for accepting the known-fraudulent offerings of the IPCCwhilst laying the foundationfor and/or promoting geoengineering crimes.

Paving the way for the One World Government / New World Order that permeatesUnited Nations Agend21and as promoted by the Pope.

Standing by and watching the destruction of our wildlife, plant life, human life, our food, our water, ourland and our oceans. Facilitating the attempted destruction of Mother Nature.

This article has been written to urge these scientists and others in positions of influence to make properesponsible use of their opportunity to no longer stand aside and facilitate but to stand strong, to break thhush and to do what they can to bring these disastrous geoengineering crimes to an end. Be the change thWorld so desperately needs.

To read more:http://www.chemtrailsprojectuk.com/cracked-top-climate-scientist-admits-to-ongoing-geoengineering/

Disclaimer:The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will no


6/6

be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article.

Documents

Top British Climate Scientist Acknowledges Ongoing Geoengineering Interventions