JT-60U

Toroidal rotation dynamics in pedestal and core across ELMs in JT-60U

ITPA T&C TG meeting, 2008/10/20-23

Y. Kamada, M. Yoshida, Y. Sakamoto, N. Oyama, K. Kamiya and the JT-60 Team

Japan Atomic Energy Agency

JT-60U

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

-6 104 -3 104 0

1.5 MA, 6.4MW, L-mode1.2 MA, 6.0 MW, H-mode1.5 MA, 7.9 MW, H-mode1.8 MA, 7.8 MW, H-mode

gradPi ( / )Pa m

-CTR rotatingCO

CTRCTR

0

5

10

15

20

0 2 4 6 8 10χi (m

2/ )s

( )B

( )A

( )C -20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

0 5 10 15 20χφ (m

2/ )s

Characteristics of the momentum transport and the intrinsic rotation

Ip/BT=1.2 MA/2.5 T, PABS=5.6-9.1 MW, ne=2.0-3.0x1019 m-3

(a) χ increases with χi, χ/χi~1-3 at r/a=0.5.

(b) χ/χi increases with Ti.

(c) -Vconv increases with χ, -Vconv/χ~0.5-2 (m-1).

(d) Intrinsic rotation (Vt) grows with increasing gradPi. This tendency is almost the same in L-, H-mode, CO-, CTR-rotating plasmas, even in the different Ip, over a wide range of χ. -> Local gradPi causes the local

value of intrinsic rotation.

-Vconv/χ

~0.5-2 (m-1)

r/a=0.5(c)

(d)

0.3<r/a<0.6

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5Ti ( )keV

( )B

( )A

( )C

χ/χi

~1-3

(a)

(b)

r/a=0.5

IAEA EX/3-1, M. Yoshida

JT-60U

Motivation: Boundary Condition for Vt(r) ?

External torque (NB)

Toroidal rotation velocity (Vt) profile

Ripple loss of fast ions

intrinsic rotation

χ Vconv

Pressureprofile

Momentum Transport0

50

100

150

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1r/a

External torque

ion lossχ

Vconv

Intrinsic rotation

M.Yoshida et al. IAEA

Boundary Condition? ELM, Pedstal Structure (transition) etc.

JT-60U

-20-10

01020

outward

inward1.2 MA

1.5 MA1.8 MA

0.1

1

10

102

χφ (m2/ )s

1.2 MA1.5 MA1.8 MA

0.1

1

10

102

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

χi (m2/ )s

/r a

1.2 MA 1.5 MA

1.8 MA

JT-60U

Change in rotation and temperature profiles by ELM

Type I ELM : degrades momentum conf. (or CTR drive) > Thermal energy conf.

016.45.65.866.2Time(s)024681012r/a=0.98r/a=0.87r/a=0.76-1.5-1-0.50Ti(keV)Vt(105m/s)Dα- .( . .)div a u/ =0.76r a/ =0.87r a/ =0.98r a01020304050-2-1012( )a17110E00.20.40.60.815.8 s L6.05 s ELMfree6.17 s ELMing/r a( )bITB

Vol. integral (r/a=0.76-1.0) ( ELMy - L ) / ( H -L )=

nT = 79%nV = 46%

High-p ELMy-H 2.0MA, 4.4T, 28MW, 2CO+2CTR

This may cause degradation of ITB ?

JT-60U

Ti(r), Vt(r), and Ti/Ti and Vt/Vt across ELM (-2.5ms and + 5ms) for a CO- and PERP-NB injected discahrge. Change in Vt at 0.5<r/a<0.8 is not due to loss of the intrinsic rotation.

Ip=0.85MA, Bt=2.4T, =0.38, =1.40, q95=4.49, Pinj=9.5MW with 4.2MW of CO and 0.8MW of CTR)

The ELM affected area for Vt is wider than that for Ti, and can exceed the ITB-foot radius, and Vt/Vt > Ti/Ti

JT-60U

2.3

2.8

0

2

4

6

-160

-120

-80

-40

0

0

40

80

120

160

5.955.70 5.55 5.80time (s) time (s)0 0

3 1-20

20

0.88

0.94

0.98

0.790.700.610.530.450.31

r/a 0.99

0.95

0.890.800.710.620.540.46

0.32

r/a

0

2

4

6

0.940.98

0.790.700.610.530.45

0.31r/a

0.88

0.32

0.460.540.620.710.800.89

0.95

0.99

r/a

E49228: CO + PERP E49228: CTR + PERP

2.3

2.8(a) (b)

The ELM affected area is deeper for CO rotating plasmas than CTR rotating ones

Ip=1.6MA. Bt=3.95T, =0.36, =1.46, q95=4.3.

CO+PERP ： Pinj=9.3MW (4.1MW CO +0.8MW CTR)

CTR+PERP: Pinj=10.5MW (4.0MW CTR)

Wdia/Wdia~6%

Wdia/Wdia~2%

CO-injection case: the pedestal rotation (r/a=0.94) is counter directed, and Vt changes to Vt=0 ( in other words, shift in the CO-direction ) after the ELM crash.

JT-60U

0

2

4

6

8-50

0

50

100

150

Vt (km/s)

before ELM

5ms after ELM

Ti (keV)

5ms after ELM

before ELM

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1r/a

/ Ti Ti

/ Vt Vt

-150

-100

-50

0

( / )Vt km s

before ELM

5 ms after ELM

( )Ti keV

before ELM

5 ms after ELM

0

2

4

6

8

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1/r a

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

/ Ti Ti

/ Vt Vt

49228: + E CO PERP 49228: + E CTR PERP(a) (b)

ΔTe / TeΔTe / Te

The evaluation of Vt/Vt and Ti/Ti in this paper does not mean the ELM-eigenfunction distribution itself from the view point of MHD instability. However, the change within 5ms is much faster than the typical radial propagation time of momentum transport (which is a few 10 ms from r/a=0.8 to r/a=0.3. )

The ELM affected area is deeper in the order of Vt (r), Ti(r) and then Te (r)

JT-60U

00.20.40.60.8101234567WELM/ (%)W ELM Penetration radius( / >4%)A AVtTiTe

The ELM affected area is deeper in the order of Vt (r), Ti(r) and then Te (r)

The deeper ELM affected area for Vt(r) may be related to the momentum pinch

JT-60U

Change in rotation and temperature profiles by L-H Transition

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

-200

-100

0

100

5.5 5.9

r/a=0.73

0.83

0.94

E26939

0

5

10

15

0

1 D α - d i v

( )time s

- L H transition

( )Ti keV

( / )Vt km s

0.94

0.83

/ =0.73r a

=5.80t s

H-phase

t=5.65s

L-phase

-200

-150

-100

0

50

-50

t=5.80s

H-phase

t=5.65s

L-phase

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1r/a

Vt(km/s)

Ti (keV)

E26939

(a)

(b)

(c)

(Ip=2.4MA, Bt=4.32T, =0.08, =1.74, q95=2.93, Pinj=32.7MW with 4.5MW of CO-tangential and 5.2MW of CTR-tangential NBs

JT-60 reported a sudden (within ms) edge-core connection appearing as change in the electron diffusion coefficient at ITB across L-H and H-L transitions [S.V.Neudatchin,2002].==> How about Ion system ?

Ip=2.4MA, BAL-injITB softens by L-H transition

JT-60U

0

1

5.75 5.9time(s)

-40

0

-40

00

1

2

D α - d i v

48732E

- L H transition ELM & ELM

- H L transition

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

-60

-40

-20

0

20

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1r/a

t=5.76s L

r/a=0.90

r/a=0.81

r/a=0.90

r/a=0.81Vt(km/s)

Vt(km/s)

Ti (keV)

t=5.78s

t=5.82s H

after H trans.

Vt(km/s)

Ti (keV)

E48732

(a)

(b)

(c)

Ip=1.0MA, Bt=3.04T, =0.19, =1.49, q95=5.41, Pinj=11.3MW with 3.8MW of CO-tangential and 3.8MW of CTR-tangential

Ip=1MA, BAL-inj

In this case, the ITB structure is not so much affected by the H-transition, and the double-notch profile of Vt(r) with small Vt and Vt-shear at 0.5<r/a<0.7is kept in the H-phase.

After H-transition, the edge Vt at r/a=0.90 shifts to the CTR direction promptly, then Vt in the inner region incl. ITB gradually moves to CTR direction with the time scale similar to Ti

JT-60U

At r/a=0.9, Vt suddenly shifts to the CTR direction while Ti is constant, then Vt

moves more CTR with increase in Ti at that location.

In the inner region, r/a=0.80, the initial sudden change in Vt does not appear, and Vt and Ti moves with the same time scale.

Just after the ELM crash, t=5.83s in above Figure, the recovery of the edge CTR rotation is much faster than Ti. At the H-L back transition, t=8.62s, the edge CTR rotation is promptly lost. This edge Vt dynamics is almost the same as reported in [M.Yoshida,2006]

Sudden CTR shift of Vt-edge at H-transition

JT-60U

The type I ELM expels/decreases edge toroidal momentum larger than ion thermal energy.

The ELM penetration radius for toroidal rotation tends to be deeper than that for ion temperature, and can exceeds the ITB radius.

The ELM affected area is deeper for CO rotating plasmas than CTR rotating ones. In both cases, the ELM affected area is deeper in the order of Vt, Ti, and then Te.

The L-H transition also changes the Vt-profile more significantly than the Ti-profile. After the L-H transition, in the ELM-free phase, the pedestal Vt sifts into the CTR direction deeply and suddenly, and after that the pedestal Vt and Ti evolves in the similar timescale.

•Evaluation of Momentum Transport for ELMing H-mode needs to consider effects of ELMs

summary

JT-60U

ITB radius and ELM penetration

With increasing Wped, the ELM penetration depth expands more inward and finally reaches the ITB-foot radius

At this situation, the ITB radius cannot move outward and the ITB strength becomes weak. Then the fractions of WITB and Wpe

d to Wth becomes almost constant.

@ ITB-foot

seems to barrier the ELM crash (5.8-5.95s,6.25-6.49s),

shrinks after a few ELM attack (5.95s-6.0s, 6.49s-6.6s).

ELM crash depth follows ITB-foot.

JT-60U

ITB shrinks by ELM crash9.511r/a=0.085910.5r/a=0.1777.29.2r/a=0.26468r/a=0.35057r/a=0.438r/a=0.5264.26.73.54.7r/a=0.6153.34.52.64.16.46.456.56.556.6r/a=0.706r/a=0.798Time (s)6.87.27.6E39713

At t=6.492s,ITB was broken at the original ITB-foot radius.Te decreases in the inner region (transport: blue line).Te in the outer region increases and ELM period shortens.

ITB foot at 6.492s

[Y.Kamada 2006]

JT-60U

LinkagesFor both ETB and ITB, their radial structure and evolution have been studied significantly. However, the correlation between these two transport barriers remains still as an open issue. The correlation, if it exists, determines the whole radial profiles and then determines the dynamics of the advanced tok

amak plasma system. Boundary Conditionfor Core

CurrentProfilePressureProfileRotation ProfilePressureProfileCurrentProfileRotation ProfileDiffusionPinch :p stabilityELM H transition fast ionITBETBneutralsSOL