Upload
lucine
View
25
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Torsion in buildings the Mexican research experience after the 1985 earthquake Gustavo Ayala. TORSI O N. Caus e s No coincidence of acting and resisting forces in structures with asymmetric plan distibutions of masses, stiffnesses and/or strengths. Kinematic e f f ects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Torsion in buildings the Mexican research experience after the 1985 earthquake
Gustavo Ayala
TORSION
Causes No coincidence of acting and resisting forces in structures with asymmetric plan distibutions of masses, stiffnesses and/or strengths.
Kinematic effectsCoupling between lateral and rotational displacements of the levels.
Consequences Non-contemplated damage in asymmetric structures subjected intense earthquakes.
DAMAGE STATISTICS
19th SEPTEMBER 1985, MEXICO EARTHQUAKE
DESIGN PHYLOSOPHYTorsion DesignElastic models of single storey shear buildings. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TORSIONIt is formally accepted that under intense seismic events structural damage (non-linear behaviour) may occur.
SPATIAL VARIATION OF THE TORSION CENTRE IN MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS WITH IN-PLAN AND ELEVATION ASYMMETRY ( SHEAR AND BENDING MODELS)
CENTRE OF TORSION The Centre of Torsion of a buuilding is defined as the loci on its levels or inter-storeys at which the seismic force or shear must be applied to produce only translations with no rotations
PARAMETERS WHICH DEFINE THE LOCATION OF THE CENTRE OF TORSION. Stiffness Location of the elements Distribution of lateral loads The CENTRE OF TORSION is not an INVARIANT
SHEAR MODELS
EXACT .
Infinite stiffnesses of beams Plane frames
TRADITIONAL.
Bending on beams Inter-storey stiffnesses of plane frames
THREE DIMENSIONAL MATRIX FORMULATION
LOCATION OF THE CENTRE OF TORSION
BUILDING MODELS 4 levels
BUILDING MODELS 15 levels
BUILDING MODELS 4 levels
Model
L ( m )
Cols. in black ( cm )
Cols. in white ( cm )
W( Ton / m2 )
I
5.0
60 x 60
40 x 40
0.8
II
5.0
40 x 40
60 x 60
1.0
III
5.0
40 x 40
40 x 40
0.8
Model
Cols. ( cm )
Wall
W ( Ton / m2 )
IV
60 x 60
Concrete, fc =200 kg/cm2, 8 cm thick
1.304 y 1.152
V
60 x 60
Masonry, f*m = 15 kg/cm2, 10 cm thick
1.304 y 1.152
BUILDING MODELS 15 levels
Model
Brick wall, f*m = 15 kg/cm2, 15cm thick
Level 1to 14
Level 15
I
Entre Eje 1 - 2 y A B
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
II
Entre Eje 1 - 3 y A C
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
III
Entre Eje 1 - 5 y A E
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
IV
Entre Eje 1 - 7 y A G
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
Model
Concrete wall, fc = 250 kg/cm2, 15 cm thick
Level 1 to 14
Level 15
V
Entre Eje 1 - 2 y A B
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
VI
Entre Eje 1 - 3 y A C
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
VII
Entre Eje 1 - 4 y A D
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
VIII
Entre Eje 1 - 5 y A E
690 kg/m2
450 kg/m2
Location of the torsion centre4 levelsModel IModel II
Location of the torsion centre4 levelsModel IIIModel IV
Location of the torsion centre15 levels4 levelsModel VModel I
Location of the torsion centre15 levelsModel IIModel III
Location of the torsion centre15 levelsModel IVModel V
Location of the torsion centre15 levelsModel VIModel VII
Location of the torsion centre15 levelsModel VIII
INELASTIC TORSION
Parametric studies based on single storey models
Distribucin en planta de las rigideces y resistencias. Excentricidad esttica Relacin de aspecto de la planta Cociente Rr/ Rn Periodo fundamental de vibrar ( T ) Relacin de frecuencias desacopladas ( W ) Evaluacin del criterio de diseo por Torsin del RCDF BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND1 ) Gmez, Ayala and Jaramillo, 19872) Barrn, Ayala and Zapata, 1991
BACKGROUND3) Garca and Ayala, 19914) Zapata and Ayala,1993
Relationships of Maximum Ductility Ratios vs. Strength Distribution in shear models with resisting elements in two orthogonal directions.
SOME RESULTS OBTAINED FROMSINGLE STOREY MODELS
Relationships of Maximum Ductility Ratios vs. Strength DistributionSOME RESULTS OBTAINED FROMSINGLE STOREY MODELS
STUDY OF THE RESPONSE OF 3D BUILDING MODELS TORSIONALLY COUPLED
INVESTIGATED MODEL
CONSIDERED PARAMETERSMASS AND STIFFNESS ASYMMETRIC.DYNAMICA AMPLIFICATION FACTOR. FAdin = Mt Me
Design Eccentricity : ed1 = a es + b b ed2 = d es - b b
TYPES AND LEVELS OF STRUCTURAL ASYMMETRYMASS ASYMMETRIC MODELSSTIFFNESS ASYMMETRIC MODELSmean values
Eccentricity
Model I
Model II
Model III
Mass
0.10 b
0.15 b
0.20 b
Eccentricity
Model I
Model II
Model III
Stiffness
0.106 b
0.176 b
0.224 b
Symmetric ModelINSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF SEISMIC SHEAR (CICS)Model I Mass AsymmetricInterstorey 01
Symmetric ModelModel I Mass AsymmetricInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF SEISMIC SHEAR (CICS)
Model III Mass AsymmetricModel II Mass AsymmetricInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF SEISMIC SHEAR (CICS)
Modelo II Asimtrico en RigidezModelo I Asimtrico en RigidezInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF SEISMIC SHEAR (CICS)
Model III Stiffness AsymmetricInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF SEISMIC SHEAR (CICS)
SYMMETRIC MODELINSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF STIFFNESS (CIR)Interstorey 01
MODEL I MASS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF STIFFNESS (CIR)
MODEL II MASS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF STIFFNESS (CIR)
MODEL III MASS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF STIFFNESS (CIR)
MODEL I STIFFNESS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF STIFFNESS (CIR)
MODEL II STIFFNESS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF STIFFNESS (CIR)
MODEL III STIFFNESS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01INSTANTANEOUS CENTRE OF STIFFNESS (CIR)
SYMMETRIC MODELInterstorey 01SHEAR - TORSIONAL MOMENT HISTORY SUPERPOSED ON THE SUCT
MODEL I MASS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01SHEAR - TORSIONAL MOMENT HISTORY SUPERPOSED ON THE SUCT
Interstorey 01MODEL II MASS ASYMMETRICSHEAR - TORSIONAL MOMENT HISTORY SUPERPOSED ON THE SUCT
Interstorey 01MODEL III MASS ASYMMETRICSHEAR - TORSIONAL MOMENT HISTORY SUPERPOSED ON THE SUCT
MODEL I STIFFNESS ASYMMETRICInterstorey 01SHEAR - TORSIONAL MOMENT HISTORY SUPERPOSED ON THE SUCT
Interstorey 01MODEL II STIFFNESS ASYMMETRICSHEAR - TORSIONAL MOMENT HISTORY SUPERPOSED ON THE SUCT
SHEAR - TORSIONAL MOMENT HISTORY SUPERPOSED ON THE SUCTInterstorey 01MODEL III STIFFNESS ASYMMETRIC
DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTOR
Inelastic Dynamic Eccentricity ( e din )
MODEL
Interstorey
1
5
15
Symmetric
0.050 - 0.093b
0.036 - 0.067b
0.076 - 0.141b
Inelastic DynamicAmplification Factor ( FA din )
Mass asymmetric
Model I
2.09 - 3.89
1.38 - 2.56
1.25 - 2.33
Model II
1.02 - 1.89
0.99 - 1.83
0.87 - 1.62
Model III
1.06 - 1.97
0.82- 1.53
0.83 - 1.54
Siffness asymmetric
Model I
2.16 - 4.02
1.23 - 2.28
0.52 - 0.97
Model II
1.54 - 2.86
0.87 - 1.61
0.13 - 0.24
Model III
1.19 - 2.21
0.70 - 1.30
0.13 - 0.23
EEFECT OF FUNDAMENTAL PERIOD
STRUCTURAL MODELS Group 1 (Models 4 levels) Group 2 (Models 8 levels) Group 3 (Models 15 levels)
SIMTRICOS Y ASIMTRICOS EN MASAS
ASIMTRICOS EN RIGIDECES
STIFFNESS ASYMMETRIC
CONSIDERACIONES PARA EL ANLISIS NO LINEAL Se asume que los modelos poseen base rgidaSe desprecian los efectos P-DeltaSe asume que el sistema de piso es indeformable en su planoLas uniones viga-columna se suponen rgidasLa masa del nivel se supone concentrada en un punto (CM)La estructura no pierde su geometra inicial durante el anlisis y hasta antes del colapso Excitacin ssmica
BEHAVIOUR PARAMETERS
CIR (Instantaneous Stiffness Centre)
Centro instantneo de torsin de entrepiso obtenido en cada paso de anlisis
CICS (Instantaneous Sismic Shear Centre)
Es un punto que define la ubicacin en planta de la demanda de fuerza cortante en cada paso de anlisis.
SUCT (ltimate Shear - Torsion Surface)
Locus de las combinaciones de fuerza cortante y momento torsionante de entrepiso, que aplicadas estticamente a la estructura, producen su colapso.
RESULTSInterstorey 014 levelsMEM411MEM402CICSCIR
RESULTSInterstorey 014 levelsMEM402MEM411
RESULTSInterstorey 018 levelsMEM802MEM822CICSCIR
RESULTSInterstorey 018 levelsMEM802MEM822
RESULTSInterstorey 0115 levelsMEM1502MEM1522CICSCIR
RESULTSInterstorey 0115 levelsMEM1522MEM1502
Universidad Nacional Autnoma de MxicoPOR MI RAZA HABLARA EL ESPIRITU