Upload
kaushik-desai
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/4/2019 Tort Buy This File From Http
1/6
Buy this file from http://www.download-it.org/learning-
resources.php?promoCode=&partnerID=&content=story&storyID=647
The word tort derives from the Latin tortus, meaning crooked or twisted,
and the Norman-French tort, meaning wrong. In English law we use the
word tort to denote certain civil wrongs as distinct from criminal wrongs.
The early Anglo-Saxon did not distinguish between civil wrongs and criminal wrongs. In the Middle
Ages, however, the idea sprang up that certain
wrongs of an anti-social king, e.g. treason, murder, theft, arson, and the like,
were offences against the King or the State. The Kings peace, as it was called,
extended to every corner of the land, and all crimes were at the same time
breaches of the peace. Certain other wrongs, done by one person to another,
were disregarded by the King and the State. These were left to be enforced by
the person claiming to be injured or wronged. The injured claimant decided
whether to take action or not. The claim, if any, was for damages, i.e. money
compensation or reparation for the injury inflicted by the defendant.
Whether or not a claimant had a right of action against another for an
alleged wrong depended on the existence of a writ wherewith to begin the
action. The rights available depended in practice on the writs available. The
Forms of Action, as these were called, enshrined the rights. If there was no
writ there was no remedy available in the courts of law.
The most important all-purpose writ which covered the common civil
wrongs in medieval society was trespass. This was available for all direct
injuries to the person, goods, or lands. Thus a personal injury to another, e.g.
assault and battery, damage to personal goods, to gates, hedges, lands, or
mere entry on lands or cattle trespass, fell within the ambit of trespass.
The writ of trespass was aptly called the fertile mother of actions. After
the Statute of Westminster II, 1285, there grew up offshoots of trespass,
named trespass on the case. Whereas the writ of trespass was available for all
8/4/2019 Tort Buy This File From Http
2/6
direct and forcible injuries, the writs of trespass on the case were used for all
injuries which were indirect.
For example, where A walks across Bs land, or lifts Bs gate off its hinges,
or punches B on the nose, there is a direct and forcible injury to the property
or person of another: the writ of trespass lay.
But where A lights a fire on his or her own property which spreads to a
neighbours house and burns it, or where A digs a hole into which B falls, or
A leaves a log in the road and B trips over it and is injured, As action is not
direct and forcible: the writ of trespass did not lie. The claimant proceeded
by trespass on the case.
First, we must examine the distinctions between (a) a tort and a crime, (b) a
tort and a breach of contract, and (c) a tort and a breach of trust.
The object of criminal proceedings is primarily punishment. The police are
the principal agents to enforce the criminal law, though a private person may
also prosecute a criminal offence. If the defendant is found guilty the court
8 The law of torts
1 The nature of
a tort
(a) A crime
Buy this file from http://www.download-it.org/learning-
resources.php?promoCode=&partnerID=&content=story&storyID=647Buy this file from
http://www.download-it.org/learning-
resources.php?promoCode=&partnerID=&content=story&storyID=647
may award the proper punishment. The object of proceedings in tort is not
punishment, but compensation or reparation to the claimant, previously designated as the plaintiff
for the loss or injury caused by the defendant, i.e. damages.
The same facts may disclose a crime and a tort. Thus, if A steals Bs coat,
there is (i) a crime of theft, and (ii) trespass to goods (a tort) and conversion
(also a tort). If X assaults Y, there is both a crime and a tort.
8/4/2019 Tort Buy This File From Http
3/6
In contract the duties are fixed by the parties themselves. They impose terms
and conditions themselves by their agreement. In tort, on the other hand, the
duties are fixed by law (common law or statute) and arise by the operation of
the law itself.
Here, too, the same circumstances may give rise to a breach of contract
and a tort. Thus, if A hires a taxi-cab driven by B, and B by dangerous driving injures the passenger,
(A), the latter will have a cause of action for
(i) breach of the contractual duty of care, and (ii) the tort of negligence.
So, too, where A employs privately a surgeon, B, to operate on As son, B
owes A a contractual duty of care. If B fails in that duty there will also be
liability in tort to the child.
As we have seen (p. 15) a breach of trust fell within the jurisdiction of the
Chancery Courts, and although compensation may be awarded for damage
suffered by reason of the breach of trust, the real distinction is due to the history of equity and
common law rather than to logical reasons and development.
The province of tort is to allocate responsibility for injurious conduct
(Lord Denning). Such is the area of the law with which we are concerned.
A tort has been defined as a civil wrong for which the remedy is a common
law action for unliquidated damages, and which is not exclusively the breach
of a contract or the breach of trust or other merely equitable obligation
(Salmond: Law of Torts).
Prof. P.H. Winfield, another important authority in this field, asserts that
tortious liability arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by law; such
duty is towards persons generally, and its breach is redressible by an action for
unliquidated damages (Law of Tort).
What is the essential difference between these two writers? One school
maintains there is a general principle of liability in tort, and that all harm is
actionable in the absence of just cause or excuse: i.e. there is a law of tort (not
8/4/2019 Tort Buy This File From Http
4/6
torts). The other school maintains that there are a number of specific torts,
and that unless the damage or injury suffered can be brought within the
scope of one or more of these torts there is no remedy.
As a general rule, where one person suffers unlawful harm or damage at the
hands of another, an action in tort for that damage or injury arises. An action
in tort lies, for example, in the situation where A negligently collides with Bs
stationary car on a road and causes damage to it.
Sometimes we find instances where harm is done by one person to another
yet the law does not provide a remedy: this is described as damnum sine
injuria (damage without legal wrong). Ordinary trade competition is the
most common example. Let us suppose that a giant supermarket sets up
adjacent to, and in competition with, a small family grocer, selling all goods
cheaper. The result could well be that the family grocer, unable to compete, is
180 Law Made Simple
(b) A breach of
contract
(c) Breach of a trust
Definition of a tort
Damage and liability
Buy this file from http://www.download-it.org/learning-
resources.php?promoCode=&partnerID=&content=story&storyID=647Buy this file from
http://www.download-it.org/learning-
resources.php?promoCode=&partnerID=&content=story&storyID=647
forced out of business. Harm is done to the grocer and his or her family in
that they lose their livelihood, yet the law offers no remedy to them.
The law of torts 181
Mogul Steamship Co. v. McGregor, Gow & Co. (1892)
8/4/2019 Tort Buy This File From Http
5/6
The X company and the Y company were rival traders in China tea. The Y company persuaded
merchants in China not to act as the X companys agents, otherwise the Y company would withdraw
their agency. Held: that the Y company
acted with the lawful object of protecting and extending their trade and the
means used were not unlawful.
In contrast to the above, we can imagine a situation where there is a legal
wrong but no loss or damage. This is described as injuria sine damno, and is
an exception to the general rule that there must be damage or injury before
action may be brought. Certain torts are actionable per se (i.e. actionable in
themselves). Examples are trespass and libel: in either of these cases no loss
need be alleged or proved.
If A trespasses on Bs land, or if A removes Bs goods without lawful
authority, A may be sued in trespass; the mere entry on the land or the mere
removal of the article constitutes in each case a trespass. Similarly in libel, as
we shall see, the mere publication of the libel constitutes the wrong even
though the party defamed may have suffered no loss whatsoever.
In torts not actionable per se, the claimant will succeed only if it can be
proved that the defendant has infringed a legal right and that thereby the
claimant has suffered damage.
Malice in its popular and narrow sense means spite and ill-will. In law the
term has two distinct meanings which should be understood. Malice in its
legal sense means:
(i) The doing of a wrongful act intentionally, without just cause or excuse.
In other words wilful and conscious wrongdoing.
(ii) The doing of an act from some improper motive, i.e. a motive of which
the law disapproves for the act in question.
To act maliciously means, therefore, to do the act from some wrong and
improper motive, or merely to do the act intentionally.
8/4/2019 Tort Buy This File From Http
6/6
In tort, the intention or motive for an action is generally irrelevant.
Malice
Bradford Corporation v. Pickles (1895)
P, with a view to including Bradford Corporation to buy his land at a high
price, sank a shaft on his land which interfered with the water flowing in
undefined channels into the corporation reservoir. The corporation applied for
an injunction to restrain P from collecting the underground water. Held: that an
injunction would not lie. P was entitled as owner to draw from his land the
underground water. His malice, if any, in trying to force the purchase of the
land, was irrelevant. No use of property which would be legal if done with a
proper motive can be illegal if done with an improper motive.
Buy this file from http://www.download-it.org/learning-
resources.php?promoCode=&partnerID=&content=story&storyID=647The publisher detailed in the
title page holds the copyright for this document
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted,
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recorded or otherwise, without
the written
permission of Spenford IT Ltd who are licensed to reproduce this document by the
publisher
All requests should by sent in the first instance to
Please ensure you have book-marked our website.
www.download-it.org
Chapter extract
To buy the full chapter, and for copyright
information, click here
http://www.download-it.org/learning-
resources.php?promoCode=&partnerID=&content=story&storyID=647