Upload
schoone2626
View
112
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Zur Rolle und zum Selbstverständnis von Bergarbeiterfrauen im Nordosten Englands im und nach dem Bergarbeiterstreik 1984/85The text of this document was originally published in 1988 as an examination paper at Oldenburg University, Germany.
Citation preview
GLOSSARY 1
Glossary
ACAS Advisory, Concilation and Arbitration Service
Area The subdivision of the National Coal Board. "For seven years the pits in Northumberland and Durham were grouped as three Area formations but in 1974 they were merged into the present single North East Area." (G.L.Atkinson: 19)
ASLEF Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen
bait An expression of the North East miners for the food they take underground. Dave Douglass: "I suppose the only equivalent in standard English is 'lunch', but workers don't eat lunch (a petty bourgeois concept), and bait is hardly the same as dinner." (D.Douglass, 1975: 304) It usually consists of sandwiches with jam, or just butter.
CEGB Central Electricity Generating Board
CND Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
Cook, Arthur James (1885-1931) General Secretary of the Miners Federation of Great Britain during the miners' lock-out of 1926
DHSS Department of Health and Social Security
face or coal-face The place in the mine where the coal is hewn in a coal seam; the very extremity of a coal-mine
gasey In coal-mines methane often pours into the passages and seams and the mine is in danger of explosion
ISTC Iron and Steel Trades Confederation
Lodge The local branch of the NUM
MacGregor, Ian Kinloch (b.1912) After spending 40 years in the USA where he headed several companies and became infamous for his anti-union policy he became non-executive director of British Leyland in 1975, in 1980 he became chief executive of the British Steel Corporation and in 1983 chairman of the NCB
GLOSSARY 2MFGB Miners Federation of Great Britain
MMC Monopolies and Mergers Commission
MORI Market and Opinion Research Institute
NACODS National Association of Colliery Overmen, Deputies and Shotfirers
NCB National Coal Board. Renamed British Coal in 1985
NEEB North East Electricity Board
NUM National Union of Mineworkers
NUR National Union of Railwaymen
NWAPC National Women Against Pit Closures, a national organisation "bringing together all the support groups.- In August 1985, about 1,000 women gathered in Sheffield for its first conference." (A.John, 1986: 93)
Pit-head The overground area of a colliery
Scargill, Arthur (b.1938) He was the son of a miner and became a miner himself at 15. In 1969 member of the Yorkshire NUM executive, since 1981 president of the NUM
SEAM Save Easington Area Mines
Spencer,George After the 1926 miners' lock-out Spencer, Labour MP, set up a breakaway union, the Nottinghamshire and District Miners' Industrial Union, which rejoined the MFGB in 1937
Surface The overground area of a colliery
TGWU Transport and General Workers Union
Thatcher, Margaret Hilda,MP At the time Leader of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister since 1979 (re-elected in 1983 and in 1987)
TUC Trades Union Congress
GLOSSARY 3UDM Union of Democratic Mineworkers. The breakaway union formed in 1985
in Nottinghamshire
WAPC Women Against Pit Closures
Working Men's Club "The central leisure institution of the Durham mining community [...][,] a co-operative society for the sale and consumption of beer [...]. In some respects it resembles a pub [...]. Clubs are owned and controlled by their own members, and the facilities are exclusive to those who are members and their guests." (M.Bulmer, 1978 c: 31)
WSG Women's Support Group.
Introduction 4
1. Introduction
"'We've made independent women, much to the horror of the
independent man!'" (B.Campbell, 1986: 282) said Ann Suddick about the effect
the Miners' Strike 1984/85 had on the women in mining-communities. In the
socialist or in the feminist press many similar statements can be found about
the women1.
Did the women really change? If they did - how and why did they change
and were these changes lasting? The aim of this study is to examine the
extent and the quality of change in roles of women in mining-communities
during and after the strike and what effect this had on the way women see
themselves.
The term role is used here meaning people's observable behaviour in
certain functions (e.g. as mother or wife or member of a community) and in
certain situations (e.g. at home, on a picket line, in a soup kitchen or in a pub)
taking into account other people's expectations concerning this behaviour
(e.g. what do men or what does the state expect of the women?) as well as
their own demands and moral concepts (e.g. women's ideas of self-realization,
of a meaningful life or marriage) (c.f. H.Drechsler / et.al.:464-466).
People's reflections on their roles determine the way they see themselves
and there may be - as will be seen - considerable deviations between what is
visible on the outside and how the women see themselves.
It will be necessary to look at the factors which in the past shaped
women's roles and how both changed in the course of time, the factors mainly
being the collieries and the mining-communities. In order to evaluate women's
roles in the 1984/85 miners' strike their roles in former disputes need to be
looked at, also the strike itself - its background, the course it took - and
women's activities during as well as after the strike.
This study will mainly concentrate on the North-East of England2 or what
was Northumberland and Durham before local government reorganisation.
Most of the primary sources used for this study are from that area and a great
1 In this thesis 'women' or 'the women' means those women who in some way or other are connected with coal-mining, either as daughter, wife, mother or widow of a miner or simply as a member of a mining-community. NOT included are those women who supported the strike in support groups outside the mining-communities.2 Maps of the North East are printed in the appendix.
Introduction 5part of the secondary material is about the North East. Where material was not
available - often historical studies - material on other coalfields in Great Britain
have been consulted which is legitimate insofar as the coalfields developed
similarly in their essential characteristics.
As far as possible people from the coalfield(s) will be quoted to obtain a
vivid and authentic image of their situations and thoughts. In addition to this
there will be more primary material printed in the appendix, e.g. poems, a
letter, part of a diary and more3.
Many books and articles were written about the miners' strike. Those
books written or published by women from the coalfields are often available
only locally, usually through the authors, and are rarely to be found in libraries
and hardly ever in bookshops. This does not make it easy to obtain a complete
picture of what was written by these women during or after the strike. Most of
the other books or articles mention women's activities or women's roles in the
strike but only a small number - preferably those by feminist authors - deal
explicitly with this topic (e.g. Jean Stead: Never The Same Again). There are
also no long-term studies of women's roles for the time after the strike. Such a
study should be desirable for the established feminist movement which had
always tried to put up a working-class women's movement but never
succeeded. The feminist movement could learn for the future from the
experiences of the Miners' Strike 1984/85.
3 Spelling mistakes occur frequently in these primary sources and will therefore not be marked explicitly.
The evolution of women's roles 6
2. The Evolution of Women's Roles in the Coalfields
2.1 Introduction
This chapter will try to illustrate the evolution of the roles women in the
coalfields have played until the Miners' Strike 1984/85. It will try to find the
material and social basis for these roles. For a deeper understanding "it is
necessary to interpret how divisions between women and men in mining
communities exist materially at home, in the workplace and in the community.
For these divisions reproduce ideologies, which in turn reinforce the existing
divisions." (S.Miller: 357). The home (and family ), the workplace and the
community are the cornerstones of this chapter, the colliery, as will be shown,
determining their character completely. It also shaped women's roles, the
reasons will be explained.
2.2 Coal-mining and the pit-village
2.2.1. Mining - male or female ?"Today all Britain's coal-miners are men. The only women to be seen at a
colliery are the canteen staff, office cleaners and secretaries.[...] No woman
can be employed as a miner underground. The ban does not include work
done above ground but no women now work with coal on the surface [...]
either. This has not always been so." (A.John, 1984: 1). In the early drift mines
in Britain, mere holes dug into hills or river banks, as well as in the later shafts,
sunk from the fifteenth century onward, families worked together, men as well
as women and children. Almost from the beginning of coal-mining men and
women had different tasks in the mines with the men usually cutting the coal
and the women transporting it. Britain's demand for coal inreased from the
Elizabethan age when people began to burn coal in their home fires instead of
wood, until production reached its peak in 1913. Coal, or 'King Coal' as it is
often called, was Britain's largest and most important industry. New industries,
such as glassmaking, smelting of iron, etc. used coal. "The introduction of
steam machinery, the development of the railways and inventions such as gas
street-lighting all pointed towards coal-mining being one of the biggest growth
industries of the nineteenth century." (A.John, 1984: 4).In Victorian times
Britain supplied about 80% of the world's coal! In its peak year 1913 Britain's
coal industry produced a quarter of the world's coal supplies at more than
The evolution of women's roles 73,000 pits. One and a quarter million men formed the workforce of the
industry when there was a total working population of about 19 million. "In
mining areas the proportion was, of course, much higher. In Northumberland
in 1911 one in five of the working population was a miner, and in Durham
almost one in three." (Pollard: 18). These numbers give an impression of the
position coal-mining had in Britain and also illustrate the coal industry's
influence on the culture and on local and national politics.
It is a commonly held view today that coal-mining is, and always was, a
completely male industry. Only recently have historians and social scientists
illuminated women's roles in the industry (cf.: A.John, 1976, 1980, 1982,
1984). According to them the history of coal-mining in Britain is as much the
history of men as it is of women. Women were unlucky insofar as the image of
mining and miners was already distorted when historians began to examine
the history of coal-mining. It was distorted mainly because women had been
excluded from the industry early in the nineteenth century. This not only put
the women out of sight but it also was the basis for the roles women in the
coalfields played and still play.
It was mechanisation which started the process of excluding women from
the industry. "'Earlier English Commonwealth did actually embrace
men/women as a whole, because families were self-contained and necessary
to the state, but the mechanical state which replaced it, and where
development has accompanied the extension of capitalism, has regarded the
individual as the unit not the family'." (A.Clark: 14; quoted in: Holderness: 13).
This was bound "to exite struggle on two fronts - between capital and labour
and between men and women - for control over the new labour
process."(B.Campbell, 1986: 257). The men were aided in their struggle by the
capitalists whose long-term interest, apart from the short-term interest of
extracting as much surplus value from the individual as possible, was to
secure the labour capacity for the future. "Thus not only protective legislation
against the exhaustion of human body and mind at work, but public health
measures, national education, and various efforts to protect small children
from neglect were introduced." (S.Rowbotham: 59). In this situation criticism
of the female mineworkers developed: Women's work underground was
criticised on three major grounds:
The work the women did was dangerous and physically injurious:
Angela John points out (A.John, 1976: 2) that the middle class
The evolution of women's roles 8commentators probably knew little about the actual working and
living conditions of the women. It is interesting to note that the same
working conditions led to different conclusions: men were admired
and glorified because they resisted danger, fought against nature,
etc. but the women were to be banned from the mines.
Working underground was immoral:
Women's place was in the home, not working was respectable,
working would lead to a loss of self-respect "but also caused their
husband's downfall." (A.John, 1976: 3).
Women were cheap labour:
Men feared that the employers would prefer women as employees.
But instead of raising women's wages they were replaced by men, as
was to be expected in the view of the aim to exclude women from
the industry.
With the Children's Employment Commission which was appointed
in 1841 to investigate the working conditions for children in factories and
mines, this criticism came into public view. The Commissioners found the
working conditions underground appalling and therefore "they decided to
include adult women in their reports." (A.John, 1984: 9). Working conditions
were very bad indeed and the replacement of women and children, who
usually did haulage work, by pit ponies indicate this. Women actually did not
like to work in the mines but as they needed some kind of employment and
the mining village offered no other they usually had no alternative. The
Commission, and with them most middle- and upper-class people did not see
this. They blamed the women for neglecting their children and "for being bad
housekeepers, not asking how women could keep a house when they worked
sixteen hours and earned so little money they had nothing to keep it with."
(S.Rowbotham: 58). The result of the commission's work was the Mines and
Collieries Act, passed on 10 August 1842, which banned "all children under 10
and females of any age from working underground" (A.John,1984: 41). Women
continued, however, to work on the surface on coal preparation4 but colliery
closures, further mechanisation and replacement by men drove out pit
women. "The last two women screen workers were made redundant at
Whitehaven [Cumbria] in 1972, 130 years after females had been forbidden to
work below ground." (A.John, 1976: 14).
4 In the North-Eastern coalfield, which was comparatively prosperous, women were employed below ground only until the 1780s. "the tradition had died out completely by the 19th century." (S.Alexander / et.al.: 175)
The evolution of women's roles 92.2.2 The pit-village
In his study "Sociological Models of the Mining Community" (M.Bulmer,
1975) Martin Bulmer argues that mining communities all over the world
generally have several main characteristics. These characteristics are:
1.Physical isolation of the community
2.Economic predominance of mining in the community
3.The nature of work in the pit
4.A special kind of leisure activities
5.The family
All of these characteristics are more or less interrelated but the overall
factor which shaped the whole community is the colliery itself, as will become
clear in the following description of the ideal-type of a British mining
community of after 1842.
2.2.2.1 Physical IsolationCoal-mining necessitates the location of the pit "at the point of extraction
in the mineral field." (M.Bulmer, 1975: 85). The coalfields were often situated
in remote and underdeveloped parts of the country which led to a minimal
contact with the outside world. This meant almost complete physical and
social isolation, reinforced by the fact that the work itself was literally hidden
from view as it was carried out below ground. Despite the great importance of
coal and coal-mining for the nation's wealth and power, the miners and their
work was usually ignored. Their "exclusiveness and remoteness made colliers
a source of terror, though not wonder, to the 'respectable' population"
(M.Pollard: 15). The report of a government inspector about the north-east of
England is very revealing:
"'The erection of long rows of unpicturesque cottages, the arrival of
wagons piled with ill-assorted furniture, the immediate importation of
the very scum and offscouring of a peculiar, mischievous and
unlettered race, the novelties introduced with almost fabled rapidity
into the external features of the country, dense clouds of rolling
smoke, the endless clatter of endless strings of coal wagons, the
baleful colour imparted to the district, are surely sufficient to
untenant the seats of the wealthy, and untenanted do they speedily
become. The arrival of the pitmen is the sign for the departure of the
gentry, and henceforward few indeed visit that district but they who
traffic with the coals or the colliers.'" (M.Pollard: 19).
The evolution of women's roles 10Isolated communities "have their own codes , myths, heroes, and social
standards. There are few neutrals in them to mediate the conflicts and dilute
the mass." (C.Kerr / A.Siegel: 191). Martin Bulmer proposes to replace the term
'isolated mass', which is usually used in this context, by the term 'occupational
community'. In his opinion "the 'isolated mass' hypothesis [is] [...] an
oversimplified view of the social structure of mining communities." (M.Bulmer,
1975: 71). Unlike the term 'isolated mass' 'occupational community' includes a
certain degree of voluntarity. "The three defining characteristics of an
occupational community [in this view] are that its members see themselves in
terms of their occupational roles; members of occupational communities share
a reference group composed of the occupational community; and members
associate with, and make friends of, other members, and so carry work
activities and interests into their non-work lives. The development of an
occupational self-image is important because the value systems held by
members of an occupation are frequently relevant not only to the worlds of
work but to many other aspects of members' lives." (M.Bulmer, 1975: 80).
As has been shown half of the members of these communities is excluded
from the work that determined their lives for about 150 years. "Yet although
employment prospects for women in mining areas have never been good, they
are nevertheless better than in the past (although much work is part-time).
Since 1945, improved communications have helped to break down both the
isolation and community spirit for which mining areas have been so
renowned." (A.John, 1986: 93). This isolation of the mining-communities had
far-reaching consequences for their members: A strong feeling of being
connected with the community developed. "So there was this insularity and
isolation and one became terrible attached to one's village and there was little
marrying out - I've noticed that.[...] husbands and wives generally came from
the same village, if not, from not very far away. There was very little cross-
breeding." (S.Chaplin, 1972: 6). Mining-communities developed their own
customs, "'they have thus acquired habits and ideas peculiar to themselves;
even their amusements are hereditary and peculiar (J.R.Leifchild: 197; quoted
in L.Fish, Vol.I: 10). The isolation as well as close family ties confirmed and
strengthened the culture and the ideologies of the mining-communities.
2.2.2.2 Economic predominance of miningThe colliery determined life in the community: it was its economic basis.
"Mining jobs represented a community resource; they were the basis of
community life in the Easington District. The jobs were, in a sense,
The evolution of women's roles 11'everyone's' as were the pits; nationalised 'on behalf of the people'."
(H.Beynon, 1984: 108).
In County Durham were employed in coal-mining:
Year % of the male population
1911 46.9
1921 49.5
1931 45.1
1961 24.9
1971 10.6
(Numbers from M.Bulmer, 1978 c: 22)
These numbers, however, include all communities in County Durham
which were not mining-communities, for example the administrative and
University town of Durham City. Typically more than 2/3 of the male
population in mining areas were miners - even in 1984: "In the Easington
District fifty per cent of all male jobs are in the pits." (H.Beynon, 1984: 105).
The mine owners not only provided the jobs but also a conciderable number of
houses for the miners - in 1925 for example they provided 49,000 houses in
the Durham coalfield (with a total workforce of 147,000 miners there), the rent
was regarded as part of the miners' wages. Providing these colliery houses
was not just humanitarian - it offered considerable advantages to the
mine owners:
"Such settlements were a great inducement to recruitment and
represented a considerable improvement on previous housing e.g.
farm labourers cottages. Also colliery villages created a ready supply
of labour when extra people were needed - villages were isolated by
nature and occupation so people often had no other choice than try
to obtain work at the pit. Another advantage (for the colliery owners)
that such proximity enabled men to be worked longer hours and
ensured punctual attendance. The colliery company truly controlled
access to work housing and retail credit all of which depended on
having a job and working hard enough to keep it." (K.Armstrong /
D.F.Wilson: 3).
2.2.2.3 The nature of workCoal-mining and quarrying were, after deep-sea diving, the industries in
Great Britain with the highest accident rates and with most fatal accidents.
The evolution of women's roles 12The danger of the job is one of the outstanding characteristics of coal-mining
and despite numerous safety precautions this is true even today! The process
of extracting coal under most adverse conditions (in great depths, in low and
often wet seams, with the permanent danger of explosions or roof-falls, etc.)
was at the same time dangerous and physically as well as mentally
extraordinarily exerting, mechanisation only gradually setting in because of
the geological conditions underground.
Geological and ecomomic conditions determined the working conditions in
the mines, therefore regional differences existed: "In Yorkshire, the North-East,
Lancashire and South Wales a combination of adverse geological conditions
and rapid industrial expansion combined at different periods to increase the
number of major disasters far above the national average. There were the
'gasey' seams in Northumberland, Durham and Lancashire" (J.Benson: 41).
Physical strength, courage and skill were necessary for mine-work,
qualities which evoked admiration for the mineworkers. In 1911
Winston Churchill told the British Parliament his opinion of the miners:
"A large modern colliery, with its intensive and carefully elaborated
equipment, including the various appliances for getting the coal and
bringing it to the surface of the ground, or transmitting power
through long distances underground, or causing great volumes of air
to flow through confined passages many miles in length, or draining
wide areas underground and raising water to the surface, or sorting
the coal into various sizes, separating it from the intermingled dirt;
that spectacle, as has been said, is one of the most remarkable
specimens of human activitiy in its struggle with and over
matter.'" (quoted in G.L.Atkinson: 19).
Beatrice Campbell gives this explanation for the admiration of miners:
"Miners are men's love object. They bring together all the necessary elements
of romance. Life itself is endangered, their enemy is the elements, their
tragedy derives from forces greater than they, forces of nature and vengeful
acts of God. That makes them victim and hero at the same time, which makes
them irresistable - they command both protection and admiration."
(B.Campbell, 1984(2): 97). The mineworker, meanwhile exclusively of the male
sex, was glorified, his life and work were equally idealized (cf. some of the
novels of D.H.Lawrence or George Orwell). Praise, admiration and glorification
were very effective means to appreciate the work of the miners on the one
The evolution of women's roles 13hand (after all Great Britain's power and wealth was based essentially on
coal!) and on the other hand to dissociate oneself from it because nobody else
really wanted to do this dirty and dangerous job or expected their children to
do it. The dangers of the pit and the admiration the miners experienced could
not remain without consequences on the miners themselves and their families.
In the narrow and often remote seams the miners worked in small groups,
usually responsible for themselves and little controlled by supervisors or
employers. Work, wages and even the survival of the individual depended very
much on a good cooperation with the work mates, more than in any other
industry. "The miner is always dependent on others, and the workers
underground must function as an efficient team. Cooperation is essential, not
only for productivity, but often also for survival.[...] This cooperation is also
found above ground; the mining community learned through a long series of
strikes and lockouts that it must be united to survive." (L.Fish, Vol.I: 19).
Solidarity, cooperation and group-orientation as well as occupational and
physical skills were therefore indispensible for the mining-communities.
Although these characteristics were seen as relating exclusively to the male
members of the mining-communities the women knew of the importance these
characteristics had on their own existence and future. Therefore they did not
openly oppose the obvious overrating of the men. The working conditions
having remained more or less the same until some decades ago hardly
anything changed in this field: "Despite great acceleration in production, the
opening of new pits and the deepening of existing shafts, the work of the man
on the coal-face remained very much the same as it had been for centuries,
and it is only in very recent years that machinery has replaced the pick and
shovel." (L.Fish, Vol.I: 16).
The evolution of women's roles 14
2.2.2.4 The leisure activitiesThe three characteristics talked about so far of the mining-communities
had a strong influence on the leisure activities of miners and their families.
Men's domination was reflected in the leisure: "Recreation has largely been
defined in terms of male expectations and opportunities which have meant
that women's use of their free time has been dismissed as frivolous or
unimportant." (A.John, 1982: 18). Frequently miners working together also
spent their free time together which again reinforced the influence pit-work
had on the miners' values. "Since the social relationships of work overlap with
those of residence and leisure, pit work carries over into leisure time."
(M.Bulmer, 1978 c: 26). Even the kind of leisure activities was determined by
the character of work: "The pattern of leisure in mining is dominated by
insecurity, which stems in part from the dangers of death, disablement or
injury in the work of a miner." (M.Bulmer, 1978 c: 31). Miners preferred sports
and other competitive activities (leek-growing for instance was very popular in
the North East of England and there were prizes given for the products). The
elements of strength, staying power and skill at work may have had an
influence on these kinds of leisure activities.
The most important leisure activity probably was to go to a pub or to a
Working Men's Club. Here the element of danger and insecurity may have had
a strong influence: Always to live in danger of injury or even death must have
fostered a leisure time organization which was oriented at "enjoying oneself in
the present". (M.Bulmer, 1978 c: 31). The importance drinking, sports or the
'Club' had shows that the offers the community made for the leisure time of its
members were exclusively oriented at the men.
In the North East of England the Working Men's Club often was the centre
of community life. It was a meeting place for workmates, neighbours, relatives
or friends. But: "The Club is primarily a male preserve - in some, women
cannot be members, only guests - and in most the attendance of wives would
be limited to the weekend concert." (M.Bulmer, 1978 c: 32). Mrs. Whitehall
said about the Club: "'My husband was a club man, you see, he liked to go to
the club, but most women didn't like that. I would never go, it wasn't nice.'"
(Whitehall: 11).
Most of the other facilities (such as pubs, institutes, reading rooms,
libraries, brass bands, the allotments, theatres, cinemas or playing fields
(cf. J.Benson: 142-163)) were almost exclusively used by men - if they were
The evolution of women's roles 15available at all! F.H.Smith from the Rhondda Valley said: "In our village we
have nothing for recreation, except a picture palace, the British Legion (men's
and women's sections), and unfinished playing fields." (F.H.Smith: 71).
Available and, which was very important, accessible to women were
facilities of Church and Chapel. "Our only relaxation was on Sunday where we
all turned out to Chapel and Sunday School. It was a pleasure to see the
miners and their families in their Sunday best." (E.Andrews: 3-4). The church
presented itself as a centre for women's activities and it was used as such.
Especially the social aspect meant much to the women: "Faith was
undoubtedly important to them, but so was the social side of the Chapel and
for many of them, their only sources of entertainment were penny readings,
Sunday school anniversaries or [...] singing festivals" (R.Crook: 40).
2.2.2.5 The familyIn hardly any other industry the character of work determined family life
as much as in coal-mining. It was not only the large number of accidents which
in single-industry communities (which the mining-communities in
Northumberland and Durham frequently were) left "'a company of aged men,
weak women, and helpless children'." (G.Parkinson: 42) but daily routine which
influenced families most. "The pit intruded everywhere. Even if he should be
lucky enough to avoid serious injury and crippling disease, the miner and
those around him had to learn to live with his tiredness, his aches and pains,
his ruptures and his rheumatism." (J.Benson: 113). Especially shift work had
very serious concequences for the families: Regardless of the shift the miner
worked on he always expected his breakfast and his bait prepared and a hot
meal at the end of his shift as well as a hot bath. In a mining family with not
just the father being a miner but also the sons and maybe even a lodger the
women of this family had to do these jobs at all times of the day. "The
economic and work organisation of the pit imposed a corresponding cycle of
cooking, washing and household demands." (A.John, 1982: 18).
Apart from caring for the miners, family had another function directly
connected with mine-work: In the long run it provided a sufficient number of
workers for the industry. On behalf of the risks and hardness of mine-work it
certainly was to the coal-industry's advantage if the children in
mining-communities were socialized in its way. "Relatively few men who are
strangers to mining want to endure its risks voluntarily. Only those who grow
up in the environment of mining, for whom the costs are an everyday feature,
The evolution of women's roles 16become immune to them. The mining family, therefore, serves to perpetuate
the mining industry. Anything then which destroys mining families is creating
problems for the future of the industry." (V.Allen, 1981: 84). It is not surprising
then, that women were kept as the centre of the families: Even if there had
been jobs for women in mining-communities, to work would have been morally
offensive: "The working-class wife was not supposed to work, at least outside
the home. To do so would offend her husband's manhood, for it would
demonstrate his inability to provide for her. It was firmly established in
working-class culture that only the sick or the depraved sent their wives out to
work, and indeed outside the textile towns only women whose husbands were
ill or injured or drunkards or otherwise unemployable normally worked."
(P.N.Stearns: 113).
The employers also tried to strengthen women's position in the family:
Single miners were not entitled to colliery houses. The status of marriage and
family was raised and for a long time miners married earlier than any other
occupational group!
The family was seen as the basic social and economic unit "and the
distinctive economic role of the wife was to service the existing work force and
produce the next generation of workers. In return for this 'vital work' husbands
had a moral and legal duty to provide their wives with the means of
subsistence." (H.Land: 109-110).
2.2.3 ConclusionsAs should be clear by now the mining-communities as well as the people
living in them were shaped by the collieries. Apart from the features of
mining-communities mentioned so far there are some more which shaped
women's roles. The communal sense in mining-communities, produced by
isolation and reinforced by the dangers of work led the miners to organise.
Therefore the mining unions (the MFGB and later the NUM) for many decades
were the strongest unions in Great Britain.
"Under these cicumstances, working people in the colliery villages
developed their own political and social institutions and relationships
to try to cushion the worst effects of living there and to counter the
power of the colliery owners. Politically, development centered
around the emergence of trade unions and the emerging Labour
Party.[...] Socially the villagers developed a system of mutual help
The evolution of women's roles 17since for working people in the colliery village there was no option
but to help themselves. In this sense, then, the necessary co-
operation of miners working underground and the close ties of
friendship and trust that this engendered spilled over into life outside
the pit." (K.Armstrong/ D.Wilson: 4).
Solidarity and mutual help not only existed among the miners but in the
entire community. A voice from South Hetton: "'People, if they didn't help each
other, it was a bad job, they had to help each other because they depended
upon help themselves sometime.'" (D.Wilson: 47). After all women were
isolated as well and an accident in the pit could always deprive them of their
husbands, their maintenance and even of their homes (for a long time widows
were not entitled to living in colliery-owned houses!). "Women live with the
drama and danger of the pits, they live their solidarity with the pitmen."
(B.Campbell, 1984: 102). "In that visceral fight for survival [against employers
and against geological forces] the miners had their community wrapped
around them. Throughout the nineteenth century the history of the industry
was also the history of the communities." (B.Campbell, 1986: 256).
This community spirit and solidarity are alive even today (despite
numerous opposite voices (cf. F.Atkinson: 96)) as the recent miners' stike has
shown very vividly.
2.3 Women's roles in mining - communities before 1984/85
2.3.1 IntroductionAs already indicated the collieries and the work therein influenced the
roles of the people in mining-communities, men as well as women. It is not
easy to separate the aspects to be dealt with in this chapter and overlaps can
hardly be avoided. The following statement by Sid Chaplin, a former
mineworker from the North East, touches on a number of these aspects: "For
some - amongst whom must be included the women - being born in a pit
village must have meant lifelong suffering and frustration. It must have
seemed a prison. For many it offered most of the things men seek - identity,
the recognition of their peers (what else is there to seek?), a place, carefully
defined boundaries, richness in work and leisure." (S.Chaplin, 1972: 27). The
prison character of the mining-community points at the isolation of the
community but also at the isolation from social and economic resources, at
missing possibilities for self-realization. (e.g.'frustration' and 'suffering'). The
The evolution of women's roles 18mining-community offered the men what it denied the women: Identity,
appreciation (e.g. in political organisations), taking part in community life
(women were bound to the home), fulfilment in work and in leisure. The
following chapters will try to verify these statements.
2.3.2 Excluding womenSince 1842 women were not allowed to work underground and by and by
they were banned form surface work as well5. Beatrice Campbell thinks that
"...the movement against the 'pit brow lasses' was about the regulation of
women, it was about the social definition of a feminine role." (B.Campbell,
1986: 256). The concequences of this exclusion were manyfold and lasting:
Women were bound to the home, they no longer took part in community life
which, as has been shown, was closely connected with pit-work. "Feminism
faded, women were domesticated" (B.Campbell, 1984 b: 101). They
disappeared from public life into a private sphere and became almost invisible
to the outside world. The community from then on took care only of the
miners, the men. "Mining communities have a very male character. The social
and cultural life is geared to those who toil beneath the soil. Between shifts
many communities appear like ghost towns, the men at work, the women at
home." (S.Taylor: 84).
2.3.3 Jobs for womenThere was hardly a way out of their situation for the women until only
recently because there were no jobs for them. Mrs.Hanlon described the
situation of the early twentieth century: "'We used to have to go down to the
council school to do cookery, we got cookery and housewifery down in the big
school in Fifth Street Horden. There were no jobs in Blackhall and the girls that
had left school before me all had to go to service in Hartlepool.'" (Hanlon: 14).
There were two more problems the women had to deal with: On the one hand
it was against Victorian values to work as a woman. On the other for a married
woman having a job meant twice the work: "In working-class families taking a
job did not mean the substitution of one form of menial labour for another. It
meant rather that the housewife would be expected to do her new job as well
as performing all her usual domestic duties." (J.Benson: 130). The situation has
not improved very much. In many mining-communities the colliery canteen
offered the only employment for women and payment for work the women
5 In the North East women no longer worked in coal-mines in 1842.
The evolution of women's roles 19had always done.
2.3.4 Women and leisureThe communities' leisure facilities were oriented at men's needs. Women
could seldomly use these facilities. They were tied to the home because of the
children and because men were not prepared to do part of the housework
which would have given women time for their own use. This had many
consequences: Women in mining-communities were traditionally housewives.
Unlike the men they did therefore not have a chance "of finding satisfaction in
gregarious patterns of communal socialability." (M.Bulmer, 1975: 86). Neither
could they organize and so break out of their isolation.
2.3.5 The union and the womenUnions played a very important role in mining-communities. This was also
true for "An area such as Northumberland and Durham, which by the 1890s
was the most strongly unionised in the whole of the country, with over 11 per
cent of the entire population belonging to some union or other," (M.Bulmer,
1978 b: 91). Because they did not work at the pit women were excluded from
this important element of the community6.
Another barrier was that "social activities and politics were so closely
related for miners" (A.John, 1982: 19) which kept women away from politics.
The union itself helped to keep women from their ranks7. Its solidarity
hardly ever applied to the women and to the women's interests. "The labour
movement has been used by and for men to the almost total exclusion of
women's interests; it is a movement effectively hijacked by the men's
movement." (B.Campbell, 1986: 251). In her book 'Wigan Pier Revisited' which
was written before the miners' strike of 1984/85 Beatrice Campbell reports the
following event: "A woman in the Northeast involved in a campaign to improve
colliery houses arrived at a lodge meeting with material on the houses of its
members 'They told me "we've never let a woman on before and we're not
going to now" and they didn't.'" (B.Campbell, 1984 b: 110).
6 Today women who work in the colliery's canteen or in the administration are NUM members.7 Here the question arises why women should have the right to a say in the union at all: Unlike any other industry coal-mining determines women's lives very drastically, which is the reason for their wish to have some influence on the industry.
The evolution of women's roles 202.3.6 Masculinity and muscularity
Coal-mining was essentially based on physical strength and after women's
exclusion from the industry men alone were praised: "The male culture, or the
cult of masculinity as some authors have called it, arises from and is
constantly reproduced and re-created by, the dangerous nature of work in the
pit" (S.Miller: 357). Their fight against nature, against powerful geological
forces, made them heroes not only in the eyes of outsiders but for the women
in mining-communities as well. This cult of masculinity brought some
advantages and admiration for the miners but it could only be kept up as long
as women remained excluded - not just from minework but from all the other
male-dominated areas of the community as well. "So it is that the fetish of
masculinity is fashioned in men-only milieus" (B.Campbell, 1984 b: 98).
Therefore men were not prepared to support attempts to improve women's
situation. On the contrary: miners often developed beliefs and customs which
counteracted these attempts. It is quite revealing that miners thought women
brought bad luck and were therefore not allowed to enter the mines. Some
miners even returned home if they met a woman on their way to work!
Sometimes they did not go at all: "Men generally won't go to work if their bait
isn't made for them. They very, very rarely prepare it themselves"
(D.Douglass, 1975: 304).
The miners took it for granted that women stayed at home and took care
of the house, children and of the men. They expected a clean home, a hot
bath and a meal when they returned from work. Men's work was finished at
the end of their shift - women's work was not. Some examples show men's
attitudes: "In between I'd say [there] was a sizeable majority who split the
responsibility, she the running of the home and the family, he the pit and his
own leisure, meeting all reasonable demands." (S.Chaplin, 1978: 30). The split
responsibility might have looked like this: "'The married men among us who
had small babies used to bring the babies there [to the cricket ground] while
the wives did the housework.'" (B.L.Coombes; quoted in J.Benson: 164). There
seems to have been a different understanding of equality in
mining-communities which becomes clear again in G.L.Atkinson's statement:
"Amazingly, women are now working underground - in the USA as a result of
"sex equality" legislation. So much for progress!" (G.L.Atkinson: 7-8). It is not
surprising that women approved of or shared men's attitudes. After all the
miners risked their lives for the women and families. Mrs.Whitehall about her
husband: "He was the type who liked me here in the home. If he'd been to the
club he liked me here waiting when he got back." (Whitehall: 12). She never
The evolution of women's roles 21questions her husband's attitude in the interview.
The miners' demands had become a tradition in the mining-communities
and like most traditions were difficult to be changed. "Precisely because
mining communities are close and supportive, several generations of families
live in close proximity and the traditions of family life are observed and
repeated. Because one's father did little around the house one does not
expect one's own husband to do much." (S.Taylor: 85).
2.3.7 FamilyThrough men's work the pit determined women's lives and families.
Women's work was almost exclusively for the miners: "'It was the job of the
girls of the family to ease the lives of the miners by having hot water ready to
fill the tin bath, and after the bath we had to wash out the flappers and socks
and put them to dry.'" (A.Hodges: 19; quoted in J.Benson: 129).
Kellogg Durland said it even more drastically: "'The men were looked upon as
the wage earners, and the lives of the women were given up to making them
comfortable.'" (K.Durland: 118; quoted in J.Benson: 128).
For a better understanding of women's roles some aspects of family life
shall be looked at here. On the one hand shift work at the pit prevented
women form pursuing their own interests and from organizing. They were tied
to the home because they had to look after the miners. "You'd get up and see
their tin bottles filled with water and put up their bait. Jam and bread or sugar
in those days, that's all they'd take." (Nichols: 9). Or:
"'Me father went to work at 4 o'clock. He'd probably get up at 3. The women
would get up and make the breakfast and have it ready for him. Now she
might have me brothers going down the pit at 4.00. She'd stay up for them get
their breakfasts. It would be quarter to four at the earliest when she got back
to bed again. Then she'd get back up at half past seven or eight to set us off to
school. The one that went out at 4, he would come back in at 11.00 in the
morning she'd have a meal on for him have a meal on for the lads comin in, a
meal on for us comin from school. Then in the meantime she'd have a big
metal pan on the fire filled with water, that plus the boiler that was attached to
the fire to get the bath water. A zinc bath stood on the floor. They took turns in
washing in that. The women were the 'heroes' they worked harder, and helped
each other too, I think all in all they worked longer, harder shifts than the
The evolution of women's roles 22men.'" (D.F.Wilson: 48).
Women not only had no time to organize they were also isolated by the
housework. "Housework is also very isolating - it is something carried out in
private and on an individual basis" (J.Coulter / et.al: 204).
Another aspect was that housework was not regarded as 'real work'. Only
work which was subject to the forces of the market was valued - in
mining-communities only men's work. But women had no choice. They had to
work at home and, hardly astonishing, they tried to raise their work's value:
"Cleanliness, constant scrubbing and diligence in household tasks was as
important to the wife (for many years the whitest doorstep was a very
important status symbol and source of pride) as hewing the coal was to her
husband." (M.Holderness: 27)8. This pride in housework reinforced the existing
conditions - the husband earned the money and the wife looked after the
home and the children - and it would have been difficult to break out of these
conditions. Difficult because it would have been against tradition AND against
one's socialisation: "Sons are destined to be miners, and daughters the wives
of miners. This is reinforced by occupational homogeneity, and social and
geographical isolation from the rest of society." (M.Bulmer, 1978 c: 33).
Therefore women remained economically and politically powerless.
2.3.8 Identity
The three aspects had to have an effect on women and on their identity. It
also had to influence the picture others had of them.
"In mining communities women rarely have an identity that can be
called their own, they are either miners' wives or miners' daughters.
You are always introduced to new people by reference to that
relationship and always have to live with the fact that it is assumed
that your opinions are identical to those of your menfolk. In my
experience this definition of women by your relationship to men
undermines your self-confidence and sense of identity. Always to
define yourself as relating to an industry which offers no role for
women, or recognition of your value outside of the home, means that
it is difficult to have an image of yourself or your future, except
8 Cleanliness was important because it was seen as a victory over the dirt and insecurity of the pit and its attendant circumstances: poverty, hard work and a cheerless environment. "'The women work very hard - too hard - trying to cheat the greyness that is outside by a clean and cheerful show within.'" (B.L.Coombes: 21; quoted in J.Benson: 129).
The evolution of women's roles 23through a man. At one level it means that you always view yourself
as of secondary importance." (S.Taylor: 85)
Without identity, without own opinions and in the end without self-
confidence women could not effectively and powerfully fight for their interests.
They usually accepted their fate: "Most miners' wives accept the fact that their
first responsibility is to make sure their husbands' food is ready when he
returns and that he comes into a comfortable home." (M.Pitt: 76). The
following statements by some miners' wives have the same tenor:
"I think that if a woman's got a home, she should stay in and look after the
children. There's some of them that are just left to run wild. I liked to know
where she was, my daughter, even when she was 19." (Dixon: 5)
Or: "You always had to have a hot meal ready for your husband. The girls were
brought up to it in a way. That's just the way it was." (Nichols: 9).
Or: "I had a nice, happy childhood. I went to school in Brandon and when I left
school I learned shorthand and typing. I got my first post at the Miners Hall,
Redhills, Durham and was there until the end of the 1918 war. I enjoyed it, but
of course we had to give up when the men came back" (Gee: 13).
'A woman should stay in', 'That's just the way it was', 'of course we had to
give up': Obviously women did not rebel against the existing role structure,
they more or less kept in the background. There are hardly any publications by
women from mining-communities from the time before the miners' strike
1984/85, miners' autobiographies rarely mention women and even historians
started only about twenty years ago to research their roles in the past "and so
half the population disappears off the historical map." (WCCPL: 25).
2.3.9 And today...Mining-communities hardly changed until the second world war. Like
mining, its work methods and working conditions, the communities remained
in their essential characteristics as they had been for centuries. Only with the
rapid development of mass media and of communications new ideas and
values entered the mining-communities and partly ended the isolation which
in turn had to influence men's and women's roles. "It was in the 1960s that
younger miners started to drink somewhere less rough and ready where they
weren't ashamed to take their wives or girlfriends." (M.Pollard: 25). A better
The evolution of women's roles 24economic and social situation also helped considerably to change the
mining-communities: "Part of all this can be explained simply by greater
affluence and by Britain's national surrender to the consumer philosophy. But
it would not have been possible if conditions underground had not altered the
colliers' perception of themselves. This change can be put down largely to
mechanisation. [...] It would be surprising if this change had not been reflected
in the collier's surface life." (M.Pollard: 25-26). Pollard describes this effect in
more detail:
"At Grimethorpe, near Barnsley, one of the centres of the British
macho-collier tradition, it was said in 1982 that about half the
married men were owner occupiers. With owner-occupation went a
different way of life: landscaped gardens, fitted kitchens, pedigree
dogs, holidays in the States or Hawaii, even dreams of private
education for the children. Face-workers whose fathers wouldn't even
bring the coal in from the shed were to be found hoovering, changing
nappies, seeing the children off to school. One in six of Grimethorpe's
men played golf regularly, some shift workers turning up for a round
at dawn. There were still twelve-pint-a-night men to be found, but
many others opted for a video in the lounge and a drop of homebrew
or even a glass of wine made up from a Boots' kit." (M.Pollard: 25)
Despite all the changes of the last two decades traditional values and
beliefs stayed alive even in those mining-communities whose colliery had long
been closed: "'...the social patterns and attitudes of a single-occupation
community have outlasted the extinction of coal mining (in the town) since the
war; this is evidenced in the more localised kinship and friendship network, the
communication of local information relatively more through conversation than
through newspapers, and in the continuing importance and popularity of the
Working Men's Clubs.'"9 (C.C.Taylor / A.R.Townsend: 141; quoted in M.Bulmer,
1978 c: 41).
Women's roles had hardly changed until 1984/85. Many women worked
then but most of them only part-time, their wages were usually lower than
men's. In the collieries the highest paid women earned less than the lowest
paid man! And there were other kinds of discrimination as well: "men and
women do not receive identical treatment under our present social security
system, for a woman's rights to benefit are determined by her marital status
to an extent to which a man's entitlement is not." (H.Land: 108). Women, not
9 The author talks about Spennymoor.
The evolution of women's roles 25only those in mining-communities, were still rather dependent on their
husbands and the supportive character of their roles hardly changed.
In her studies Margaret Holderness found out that "All the women
I interviewed agreed that support for the husband was important and
necessary." (M.Holderness: 35)10. The conservative government under prime
minister Margaret Thatcher helped to strengthen women's traditional roles:
"Thatcher and her all-male cabinet have pursued policies which are
designed to make life worse for most women. They do not hide their aims.
Back in 1983 the Tory Family Policy Group outlined its plans for women. It
aimed:'...to encourage families to resume responsibilities taken on by the
state, for example, responsibility for the disabled, the elderly and unemployed
16 years old'. In other words they were saying that a woman's place is in the
home doing free of charge, work previously done by the welfare state.[...] The
March 1985 budget confirmed this plan with proposals that a married man's
tax allowances should be raised to the same level as it would be if both
partners were working, to make it 'economically attractive' for the wife to stay
at home." (Workers Power, 1985: 2).
10 M.Holderness interviewed 18 women who as daughters or wives of miners were connected with coal-mining. Because of the small number of interviewees and even more because of her method of selecting them M.Holderness' study is not representative: She chose women who were very independent, self-confident and politically committed. This, however, makes the quotation even more interesting!
Women in industrial disputes before 1984/85 26
3. Women in industrial disputes of the coal industry before 1984/85
3.1 Introduction The image of the women in mining-communities given so far (the
oppressed, passive, and submissive housewife) could lead to the assumption
that women never took part in industrial disputes. Only in recent years
historians proved this widely spread assumption wrong: Women always took
part, either actively or in support of their husbands. "The actions of male
workers to get better pay or conditions, or just to keep their jobs, have always
been made possible by women taking care of everything else whilst the men
were out organising." (Lambeth Women's ...: 32). Publicly, however, their
activities were hardly noticed and only a small number of documents is
available. Angela V.John studied some of them. Here are some examples:
"In 1844, women resisted evictions and scabs in the north-east.
Disputes in the 1860s saw Lancashire women addressing public
meetings and collecting funds. Whilst in Wales they attacked
'blacklegs' with stones, saucepans and frying pans - many were
arrested. In 1904, during a stoppage at Maesteg, Glamorgan, over
the employment of non-unionists, women exerted pressure on
landladies, issuing eviction notices to all non-Federation lodgers."
(A.John, 1986: 89).
Women not only supported the miners, they also fought for
themselves - and with good reasons: "'Nearly every convenience which the
nature of the miners' occupation demanded had to be furnished and
maintained by the drudgery of the womenfolk.'" (R.Page Arnot; quoted in
B.Campbell, 1984 b: 103).
An example is the dispute in South Wales in 1909-10:
"A new eight-hour-day law had prompted mine owners to set up
multiple work shifts. One of the leading causes of the strike was that
housewives had to prepare meals at all hours of the day, because
sons and husbands rarely managed to work the same shift. Women
took an unusually prominent role in the strike, stoning shops and
policemen." (M.Vincinus: 107).
Women in industrial disputes before 1984/85 27Two out of many of womens's activities before 1984/85 will be described
below.
3.2 The Miners' Lock-Out of 1926 After the end of the 1926 General Strike the miners stayed out for
another seven months. Women in mining-communities became active on a
local as well as on a national and international scale.
"Women's sections, and a national Women's Committee, operated
throughout the strike, and their main efforts were devoted to fund-
raising and distribution of food and clothing. An account of their work
was published in 1927 called 'Women and the Miners' Lockout', which
summarises their role as that of 'an industrial Red Cross'. Fund-
raising appeals were published in the press, and money was raised
by demonstrations. Selling miners' lamps was a key-method of fund-
raising, and this was done on an international scale.[...] There were
specific arrangements for providing food for pregnant and nursing
mothers, and a number of miners' children were sent on 'pilgrimages'
to stay with sympathisers elsewhere during the strike."11 (Women
fight for pits: 30).
Bella Jolly was one of the women who were active in 1926 in Stanley,
County Durham. She reported of money and clothes collections, free meals for
the children, etc. "'To help all relief cases we used to have bands parading and
have collections [...]. We used to meet twice a week and dole out these little
bits of collection.'" (M.Callcott, 1985: 41).
Elizabeth Andrews remembers the activities of the women's organisation
in Wales: "During all these months our people never lost hope. They kept busy
with soup kitchens, concerts, jazz bands, competitive meetings, and many
other activities." (E.Andrews: 25-26). The women formed sewing committees
and altered old clothes, food was distributed to people in need. Parcels came
from all over the world. Women even organized public relations: "Mrs.Beatrice
Green, of Abertillery, [...] Mrs.Johnna James, Tonypandy, and Mrs.Herman,
Pentre, also addressed meetings in London. The three were miner's wives and
good speakers." (E.Andrews: 25). It was the aim of these activities to support
the miners in their fight or as Mrs Andrews put it: "the women stood loyally by
11 The account of women's work in 1926 is: Marion Phillips: Women and the Miners' Lock-out (M.Phillips).
Women in industrial disputes before 1984/85 28their menfolk in their struggle for higher pay, shorter hours and better
conditions." (E.Andrews: 4). Mrs Jolly saw herself and the women's support
movement as the heart of the entire labour movement: "'If the Labour
movement has to go down in history, one of its finest achievements is how the
women stood by their men in 1926, and I really believe that.'" (M.Callcott,
1985: 42).
3.3 Women's fight for pit-head baths One of coal-mining's main characteristics is the dirt it produces. At the
end of their shifts the miners are covered with coal dust, their clothes are dirty
and often wet. Daily the women had to prepare a hot bath for the miners
which could be rather difficult in times when there were no bathrooms in
people's houses. At the beginning of the twentieth century the demand for pit-
head baths came up and the Coal Mines Act from 1911 made the mine owners
build them - IF two third of the miners voted for them! This they rarely did
despite the great advantages pit-head baths would have brought them. The
miners' lack of commitment for the women's cause "can be treated as a classic
case of patriarchal priorities in class struggle." (B.Campbell, 1984 b: 106). The
miners wanted to keep their influence and power over the women, they
wanted to further control women's labour and time.
Although women were successful in the end it took a long time until pit-
head baths were built at every colliery: In the North East less than half of the
collieries had pit-head baths when the coal industry was nationalized in 1947.
Clubs and institutes however existed almost in every mining-community
(cf. G.L.Atkinson: 15 / B.Campbell, 1984 b: 104).
A Durham guildswoman explained the improvements by the pit-head
baths: "My home life has been greatly improved by the inception of the baths,
a cleanliness which is very noticeable as compared with the time prior to the
building of the baths." (Pit-Head Baths: 139). Less work and more spare time
were the consequences but women did not always use this time for
themselves: "More attention can be paid by the housewife in preparing the
table for meals for the workers after coming home from the baths." (Pit-Head
Baths: 139).
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 29
4. The 1984/85 Miners' Strike and women's roles
4.1 Introduction This chapter will attempt to show if and how the roles of women in
mining-communities changed in the Miners' Strike 1984/85. A short
introduction to the strike - its origins and the course it took - opens the
chapter, followed by a description of women's activities during the strike and
by a comparison of their activities with women's activities in former disputes.
In order to obtain a more complete picture of women's roles during and after
the strike and of the way they see themselves publications by the women will
be examined from this point of view. The chapter closes with an assessment of
women's roles during and after the strike.
4.2 The background to the Miners' Strike 1984/85
4.2.1 The run-down of the industry 1947-1984Having reached its peak of production in 1913 the British coal industry
continuously contracted, the two world wars brought only short-term recovery.
Collieries had always been closed when the seams were exhausted or when no
more coal could be mined because of adverse geological conditions. The
miners had known this for centuries. After 1913, however, more pits were
closed than sunk.
For the British coal industry the year 1947 was a very important year: The
Nationalisation Act of the year before nationalised the industry on
January 1, 1947. The miners thought a new era had begun with workers'
control of the industry and with an end to exploitation. Their hopes came only
partly true.
In 1947 the National Coal Board not only took over the coal industry but
also debts of about 358 million pounds which had been paid to the former
mine owners in compensation. At the same time the demand for coal
increased in the post-war years. Therefore the industry had to produce as
much coal as it could. There was no money for large-scale modernisation
which could have made the mines more efficient and would have delayed pit
closures.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 30Although the 'Plan For Coal' from 1950 predicted increases in production
the conservative governments of the 1950s pursued a different energy policy:
Nuclear energy and oil should replace coal as soon as possible. Some years
later, in 1957, the government tried to keep the coal price as low as possible
in the home market, the NCB bore the losses. Cheap oil from the Middle East
weakened coal's market position even further. The NUM about this: "'In our
opinion it is clear that imported oil is being given a priority over coal because
of the political and economic power wielded by the oil interests.'" (quoted in
T.Hall: 79).
Pit closures on a large scale followed in the 1960s. Between 1956
and 1974 the workforce was reduced by two-thirds, 3/4 of the collieres were
closed and production sank to about 1/2. Nuclear energy also added to the
coal industry's decline. The nuclear power station at Hartlepool alone cost
about 5,000 jobs in the Durham coalfield (cf.North East Trade Union Studies
Information Unit: 6).
Here are some numbers:12
1. Great Britain:
Year Number Number of Outputof pits employed (million tons)
1860 - - 83.3
1900 - - 228.8
1913 >3000 ca.1,250,000 292.0
1947 980 ca.750,000 197.0
1957 - ca.711,000 224
1967/8 317 380,000 ca.170
1970/1 292 350,000 151.3
1982/3 ca.200 194,000 ca.120
1983/4 176 181,000 105.3
1985 - 172,363 -
1987 - 115,000 -
12 Numbers are taken from: V.Allen: 38-41; G.L.Atkinson: 10; A.Glyn: 15-17; G.Goodman: 35, 64-65; A.L.Morton: 496; The National Coal Board; North East Trade Union Studies Information Unit: 7; M.Pollard: 24-25; J.Stead: 1.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 312. North East Area
Year Number Number of Outputof pits employed (million tons)
1873 - ca.77,000 ca.29.5
1900 - 153,000 46.3
1911/3 - 227,000 56.4
1947 201 148,000 -
1967/8 - ca.62,000 -
1982/3 - - 15.7
1983/4 15 23,000 12
1985 13 20,000 -
1987 8 17,000 9
In the 46 years between 1926 and 1972 the National Union of
Mineworkers hardly fought against these pit closures. "The rundown of the
industry in the 1950s and 1960s was accepted with relative acquiescence by
the National Union of Mineworkers and their successive communist general
secretaries Horner and Paynter." (K.O.Morgan: 283). Full employment and a
policy of 'social consensus' probably were the reasons for the NUM's
passiveness.
Two national miners' strikes in 1972 and in 1974 made the importance of
coal aware to the public: The oil crisis of the early 1970s brought up the price
of oil enormously. Between 1970 and 1973 it rose by about 600%! This
strengthened the miners' position in their fight for pay rises.
A new Labour government13 drew up a new 'Plan For Coal'. "The Plan for
Coal, agreed in 1974, signalled the turn-around. The industry was to be
expanded through a huge investment programme. Deep-mined output would
be 120 million tonnes by 1985." (D.Thomas: 31-32). Production was to be
increased mainly by developing coal reserves which had been unmineable
before. "A new mood of optimism entered the industry with Plan for Coal. But,
in the event, the government and the NCB failed to keep their side of the
bargain. Less coal was mined last year [1983] than when Plan for Coal was
signed and coal's share of the energy market has fallen." (D.Thomas: 32). But
the Labour government concentrated on nuclear energy as well. In 1975/6
51.4% of the Department of Energy's budget went into research of nuclear
13 Edward Heath had called general elections in February 1974 to get a decision on who governed the country - he or the miners. The majority of the people, however, was tired of the disputes which meant short time work for many and Heath was defeated.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 32energy but only 7.4% went into the development of coal technology, even
less, 4.3%, into alternative energy sources (numbers from North East Trade
Union Studies Information Unit: 7).
The election of a conservative government in 1979 forwarded nuclear
energy even more. 'Plan For Coal' no longer was the guideline for the
government's energy policy. On the contrary: It powerfully pursued a policy
away from coal. There are several reason for this:
The government under prime minister Margaret Thatcher pursued a
monetarist policy: Private ownership and free market economy, as little state
intervention as possible. The coal industry was not privately owned and it was
heavily subsidised. Therefore the government took it in their hands to
privatise the coal industry. First steps towards this were the Coal Industry Act
from 1980 which replaced production targets (which the 'Plan For Coal' laid
down in 1974) by financial targets. These financial targets were set so high
that they could only be met by closing so-called uneconomic pits. This policy
was strengthened by the MMC's advice to reorganise the NCB into "area units
of accounting" (North East Trade Union Studies Information Unit: 8) which
made it impossible to compensate losses in some areas with gains in others.
All of these measures were to make the coal industry more attractive for
private investors. Another important step was to rename the NCB 'British Coal'
in 1985.
The conservative government showed a hostility to the labour movement
in general and to the miners in particular. The miners were still seen as the
archetypal proletarians (despite their comparatively small number) and
Edward Heath's defeat in 1974 was still ascribed to the miners.
Margaret Thatcher who had been member of the cabinet of Edward Heath
wanted to avoid such a defeat: She prepared very carefully for a dispute with
the miners. In 1981 she avoided a strike by yielding to the miners' demands.
"The truth is that the government was not ready to sit out a prolonged strike
with the miners." (G.Goodman: 23). The Coal Industry Act was taken back too.
4.2.2 The state preparesThe Ridley Report from 1978 became the government's guideline for its
energy policy. In the appendix to this report, which examined the future of the
national industries and their privatisation, a number of measures was
proposed for a preparation of the state for a dispute with the miners - as the
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 33most probable among the national industries:
* coal stocks were to be increased
* as soon as possible power stations should turn from
coal firing to oil firing
* coal imports were to be increased
* transport companies should employ non-union drivers
* welfare benefits were to be cut for strikers and
their families
* a special mobile squad of police should be set up
"to deal with any social disorder arising from
picketing and industrial violence." (G.Goodman: 29).
The government kept close to the recommendations of the Ridley Report.
At the end of 1981 NCB directors and CEGB regional chairmen were instructed
to begin stockpiling of coal. At the same time the Department of Energy was
ordered by the cabinet to increase the use of oil in power stations, a hard blow
to the coal industry which in 1983/84 sold approximately 70% of its produce to
the CEGB. Coal imports were encouraged. "In May 1980 the Social Security
(no 2) Bill was introduced giving the DHSS power to assume that workers on
strike are receiving strike pay and reduce benefits on this basis." (North East
Trade Union Studies Information Unit: 8).
Very far-reaching were the measures concerning the police:
"During 1982 Scotland Yard and the Home Office made plans to
change police training methods with industrial unrest very much in
mind. Mobile riot-squad police had already been introduced to some
of the major cities: they were very much in evidence in London,
especially in zones of racial tension. And under cover of special
training, ostensibly designed to deal with operative IRA cells, police
training was substantially changed between 1981 and 1984. Police
were also singled out for pay increases well beyond the general
industrial norm." (G.Goodman: 33).
On September 1, 1983 Ian MacGregor, who in the USA and later at the
BSC had proved his anti-union position, became chairman of the NCB. For
Margaret Thatcher he seemed to be "an ideal figure to take on Scargill and the
miners." (G.Goodman: 27).
At the end of winter, when preparations were almost finished and the
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 34trade union and labour movement seemed to be little inclined for a fight, the
National Coal Board announced the closure of Cortonwood colliery as well as
further cuts in production with a loss of 20,000 jobs.
Yorkshire miners came out on strike on March 6, a date generally
regarded as the beginning of the Miners' Strike 1984/85.
4.2.3 A short chronology of the strikeTo examine women's roles in the strike it is not necessary to know the
exact course of events which can be read about in the respective
publications14. Here only a short outline of the events will be given (mostly
following G.Goodman: 1-12):
March 1984
* Yorkshire miners went on strike (March 6), miners in Durham and Kent
followed (March 9). On March 12 the strike started nationally.
* Twenty-four year old David Jones was killed while on picket duty at Ollerton
colliery, Yorkshire (March 15).
* Power unions advised their members to cross NUM picket lines (March 22)
* NUR, ASLEF, Transport Salaried Staffs' Association, TGWU and ISTC agreed
upon a blockage of coal in support of the NUM (March 29)
April 1984
* Nottinghamshire miners voted against a strike and decided to work. (April 5)
* The NUM executive changed its rules: A simple majority was sufficient to call
a strike (before 55% had been necessary).
* A MORI poll showed a majority of 68% in favour of the strike.
May 1984
* Clashes with the police at Raivenscraig steelworks ended with three men
injured and 65 arrested when police broke up a picket line (May 8).
14 E.g.: M.Adeney/J.Lloyd; H.Beynon, 1985; A.Callinicos/ M.Simons; G.Goodman; J.Lloyd; I.MacGregor; R.Ottey; P.Scraton/P.Thomas; L.Sutcliffe/B.Hill; M.Walker; P.Wilsher/et.al.; D.Reed/O.Adamson; B.Fine/R.Millar; Blood Sweat & Tears; etc.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 35* Barnsley Women Against Pit Closures organised a women's march. Women
from all over Britain took part (May 12)
* Anne Scargill was arrested for 'wilful obstruction' at Silverhill colliery
(May 16).
* First meeting of NUM and NCB since the strike began lasted less than thirty
minutes (May 23).
* About 5,000 people picketed the Orgreave coking plant. 82 were arrested,
among them Arthur Scargill, and 62 people injured (May 29/30).
June 1984
* The Daily Mirror revealed how the government weakened the rail workers'
support for the miners by giving in to their demands (June 5).
* 12,000 people demonstrated in London on the occasion of a House of
Commons debate on the strike. 100 people were arrested (June 7).
* Talks of NCB and NUM taken up again in Edinburgh (June 8).
* The miner Joe Green was killed at Ferrybridge power station by a lorry
(June 15).
* About 3,000 police and 10,000 miners fought the heaviest battle of the
strike. 93 arrests. Arthur Scargill injured (June 18).
* In the Sunday Times Jean McCrindle proposed associate membership for
miners' wives in the NUM.
July 1984
* Home Secretary William Whitelaw allowed the application of the criminal law
instead of the civil law against the miners.
* NUM and NCB enter into new negotiations. There was a chance of bringing
their positions into line (July 5-9).
* A national dock strike was called because workers who were not members of
the TGWU unloaded coal.
* The government kept about £6.8 million tax repayments from the miners.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 36* The national dock strike was called off (July 21).
* The first conference of National Women Against Pit Closures was held at
Northern College, Barnsley (July 22).
* Chancellor Nigel Lawson announced the strike had cost already £300-
350 million. "'Even in narrow financial terms it represents a worthwhile
investment for the good of the nation'." (quoted in G.Goodman: 6) (July 31)
August 1984
* NWAPC organised a rally in London. The women handed over a petition to
the Queen (August 11).
* Miners slowly began to drift back to work.
* For the first time the TUC discussed the Miners' Strike (August 22).
* A second dock strike was called when British Steel- workers unloaded coal in
Hunterston (August 23).
* Striking miners visited the peace camp in Greenham.
September 1984
* After three weeks the second dock strike was called off.
* The Bishop of Durham, David Edward Jenkins, demanded MacGregor's
resignation.
October 1984
* Meanwhile the strike had cost £600 million.
* The unemployment rate climbed to 13.6% (3,284,000) (October 5).
* ACAS took up negotiations with NUM and NCB (October 6).
* Greenham Common women donated food to the support groups.
* Talks with ACAS ended without positive result (October 15).
* The pit deputies' union NACODS announced a national strike (October 16).
* NACODS called off the strike after the NCB had made concessions to them
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 37(October 23).
* NUM funds were seized by a court decision (the NUM had failed to pay a
£200,000 fine) (October 25).
* Talks with ACAS were stopped.
* The NCB tried to lure miners back to work with Christmas bonuses.
* The Christmas Appeal 1984 was launched.
November 1984
* A Mines Not Missiles rally was held in York (November 3).
* A national conference of the Women's Action Groups took place in
Chesterfield (November 10-11).
* About 1,900 miners had returned to work (November 12).
* Taxidriver David Wilkie was killed by a concrete block thrown from a bridge
through the roof of his taxi. Wilkie took a working miner to a colliery in
South Wales.
December 1984
* Toys for miners' children came from all over the world.
* The Christmas Appeal was published in the press.
* Nottinghamshire miners decided to make their area more independent
(December 11).
January 1985
* Return to work continued slowly
* 620 miners had been sacked since March 1984 and only 38 had been
reinstated.
February 1985
* South Wales and Durham wanted to end the strike (February 26).
* According to NCB figures 50% of the miners had returned to work.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 38March 1985
* The NCB announced the end of the strike without settlement (March 3).
* The miners march back to their collieries together with women and children
(March 5).
4.2.4 What was the Miners' Strike about?Unlike all former national miners' strikes the Miners' Strike 1984/85 was
not about pay rises, shorter work hours or improved working conditions. It was
about something far more basic: miners' jobs and consequently the mining-
communities.
4.2.4.1 JobsIt seems to be paradoxical that miners defended what they had, almost
traditionally, condemned: The jobs in the pits.
Almost every miner did NOT want his son to work in the pit. He knew the
dangers and risks of working there and he knew of the price many miners and
their families had to pay. But there were hardly ever any other jobs in
mining-communities and most men and youths ended working in the pit.
Another aspect was that the pit always offered a job in case someone was not
qualified for another.
Job prospect had steadily worsened until 1984: Unemployment rose
from 2% in 1955 to almost 20% in 1985 (c.f.North East Trade Union Studies
Information Unit: 14). And still the collieries often were the largest and only
employers in mining-communities:
"'Coalfield communities have a distinctive employment structure.
In 1981, the most recent date for which local statistics are available,
coal provided just under 30 per cent of the jobs for men - 214,000
out of three quarters of a million... The dependence on coal and
manufacturing poses tremendous problems for coalfield
communities. It is not merely that they lack diversity and are
vulnerable to job losses in their main industries: structural changes in
the national economy also disadvantage them.'" (S.Fothergill /
G.Gudgin; quoted in G.Goodman: 15).
So the jobs in the pits were as important to the community as they had
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 39been for centuries.
4.2.4.2 The community"When a works closes down, the community dies. I have experienced this,
as I come from Esh Winning, just outside Durham. It's a ghost town now, the
nearest pit is about 24 miles away." (P.Clarney: 27)15. This statement makes
clear what the existing mining-communities will undergo when their pits are
closed. In the past many communities had been spared this fate because
miners whose pit had been closed had been transferred to other pits or other
industries. In 1984 this possibility was no longer open because of a high
unemployment rate and the general contraction of the mining industry. The
concequences for the communities are higher unemployment, less spending
power, moving away of small businesses and of young people who try to find a
job elsewhere. The people in mining-communities did not want to face these
prospects and just stand by - they tried to save their communities in 1984.
"What the miners, like most of us, mean by their communities is the places
where they have lived and want to go on living, where generations not only of
economic but of social effort and human care have been invested, and which
new generations will inherit. Without that kind of strong whole attachment,
there can be no meaningful community." (R.Williams, 1985: 8). This the miners
and their families set out to defend. Raphael Samuel talked of the spirit of the
strike as a "radical conservatism [...][,] it was a defence of the known against
the unknown, the familiar against the alien, the local against the anonymous
and the gigantesque." (R.Samuel, 1986 b: 22). "Job security, personal dignity
were, on the miners' side, the issues at stake in the strike; family, hearth and
home the most potent of its mobilising appeals; 'old-fashioned' values its
continual point of reference." (R.Samuel, 1986 b: 23).
It were mainly these aspects which mobilised the women in the
mining-communities.
4.3 Women's activities in the Miners' Strike 1985/85 "The scale of the miners' wives organisation and participation is
unprecedented. 'In 1974 the strike was about money. It wasn't the
end of the world if we didn't win. This one is much more important.
We're fighting for ourselves, our children and our communities.' It is
15 Esh Winning closed in 1968
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 40in this that the women have subtly challenged the character, indeed
purpose, of the strike." (J.Head: 13).
What made women's participation so special? What did women actually
do in the strike? What motivated them? Which aims did they have and which
consequences did their participation have for themselves? These and other
questions will be looked into in this chapter.
4.3.1 The origins of women's participation"Das neue "Phänomen" [the women's activities during the strike] gehört
in die obersten Zeilen der Geschichte dieses Bergarbeiterstreiks. Ohne die
Frauen wäre er nicht so lange durchzuhalten gewesen." (H.Dirkes /
S.Engert: 19)16.
But why were women so committed to the miners' cause? The Miners'
Strike 1984/85 was a fight for a number of basic rights: The right of work, the
right to live in a community of one's choice, the right for a future for oneself
and one's children. "These issues are not 'owned' merely by miners, they
effect us all, and women in mining communities were quick to identify with
them." (S.Taylor: 81). Only in some cases women had been organised before
the strike and therefore it is amazing how quickly they took the initiative. Or
maybe it was just BECAUSE they were not organised: "...instead of wasting
time passing resolutions calling on the leadership to do the things that will
never materialise, people in the localities have, on the whole, just got on with
it. This has not only been on a local basis but also nationally." (D.Massey /
H.Wainwright, 1985 a: 167). This 'just got on with it' (another keyword here is
'necessity') seems to characterise the beginning of a women's support
movement especially well. As has already been said a strike of these
dimensions is only possible if the organisation of daily life is done for the
strikers who then can concentrate on the dispute. This is the starting point for
women's involvement: "Necessity, not choice, drove them" (H.Rose: 328), very
"direct and immediate needs" (L.Loach, 1985: 169) motivated them to become
active - but not only to provide for their families but also "to defend their
livelihoods and their communities" (L.Loach, 1985: 169).
It is certain that this women's movement did not originate in the
established feminist movement which still was urban and mostly middle-class
16 For a translation see Appendix
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 41oriented: Too many of the women dissociated themselves from it - before AND
after the strike. It must be taken for granted, however, that women in
mining-communities knew of the ideas and positions of the women's liberation
movement and were to some degree influenced by them - just as any other
person. There were of course other influences, for example the women at the
Greenham Common cruise missile base who had successfully and
independently organised as women. But what was true for the feminist
movement was true for Greenham as well: The women's attitude was sceptical
if not disapproving.
The phrase 'people just got on with it' could lead to the false impression
no further motivation had been necessary to activate the women. This was not
always the case. Usually women needed 'a little push' to become active which
often came from women who in some way or other had been active before the
strike. In Easington this was Heather Wood, County Durham's youngest County
Councillor. She organised the first Women's Support Group in the Easington
District:
"And when the strike started - I mean, I felt a bit frustrated because
my husband isn't a miner - then I thought: well, those people are
goin' out and fightin' a fight for me - really, because they were
fightin' the Tories - I should be able to do something and the only
thing I thought was: organise the women because the men were
already, partly, organised - very disorganised I think, but they had
somewhere to go, they had a group to meet with." (H.Wood).
Later, when the women had already taken up support work, they
sometimes needed to be pressed on as well:
"So I said 'Look! It's either you all take part or I'll just give up and
we'll not be successful.' And that was the point when they said 'Right,
we'll go. We'll take it in turns.'" (H.Wood). Or: "Sometimes it's
difficult, I mean, during the strike I can remember Tyne Tees asked
round me and said 'Would Easington Women Support Group go into a
television programme - Nightline - and would they speak about
women's activities in the strike?' And I said 'Ah yes. They'll come.'
And I didn't tell them. I just said 'We've been invited to sit in the
audience.'[...] So when they got on the bus I said 'By the way, you're
taking part in the programme. You have to speak, you know, and
answer questions.'[...] And they did it. And once they'd done it they
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 42went out and they did it again, you see" (H.Wood).
4.3.2 Women's activities and what they meant for them"In view of the rationalisation of industry and the extension of women
labour it is of particular importance to draw women workers into strikes. We
have learned by experience that women workers and working men's wives
play a very important role in strikes and lock-outs." (National Minority
Movement: 218). This statement is not from the 1980s but was published
in 1932 after the experiences of the 1926 General Strike and other strikes in
Europe. These were to be the consequences: "During the strike women
workers and working men's wives are to be drawn into active collaboration
and entrusted with various functions in regard to agitation, organization and
auxiliary service." (National Minority Movement: 218). Until 1984 these
experiences had hardly been utilised. On the contrary. Margaret Thatcher's
government trusted in women's restraint. "The gutter press heaped enormous
praise on a tiny number of 'petticoat' pickets at Ollerton. They hoped that
women's domestic isolation, lack of political experience and traditional
involvement in the Labour movement would set them against the NUM." (The
Red Miner, April 1985: 6).
The NUM did not try to draw women into the strike either. To support the
miners the women had to rely entirely on their own initiative. Usually they
began with the most obvious support work: The provision of the families with
food.
4.3.2.1 The soup kitchensHeather Wood described how The Women's Support Groups began to
work in the Easington District:
"I think it was in about the third week, the third week in the strike, we
decided we would do that. We wrote out and within the next fortnight
we had the main public meetin'. And the night after the public
meetin' there was a man came with some food, so I got a group of
women in Easington to say, 'Well, we'll start a kitchen tomorrow', and
we sat with little, with big bags of sugar and split them up into little
tiny bags, you know, and a box with cornflakes and split them up into
about six different bags and so we served six families. And then the
next week, when the man brought the food, we said, well, you know,
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 43it's no good just Easington not going hungry. We've gotta keep all the
mines out and keep the strike strong. And so we phoned somebody
in Murton that we'd made contact with and said 'Will you have the
food this week to start your support group?' and it went on like that
week after week until there were sixteen support groups in the same
organisation." (H.Wood).
The first but most important step had been done: Setting up the soup
kitchens (in Easington called 'The Cafe') had a number of very positive effects
for the women.
Soup kitchens were unsuspicious:
The soup kitchens' primary function was to provide the miners'
families with food. Women were not deterred by feminist ideologies,
political agitation or even by a male dominated organisation. At first
women's work in the kitchens was simply an extension of their role
as housewives.
Soup kitchens ended women's domestic isolation:
Organising the soup kitchens gave women the chance to meet other
people. How important this was in some cases is made clear by
Heather Wood: "We had one woman in our support group that would
actually never go out to the shops herself. Her husband had to do the
shopping because she was such a nervous person. She came to our
support group, helped out, she's never been the same since. She'll go
anywhere, talk to anybody" (H.Wood).
Women's isolation not only ended within the support group, they
suddenly became the centre of community life. Heather Wood: "...our
kitchen was the only meeting place that the mining families had."
(H.Wood). Running a kitchen also made it necessary to organise the
work. "It has meant going round local shops and businesses
appealing for food, finding the premises and the equipment and
collecting the finances to keep the canteens running."
(M.Douglas: 11).
Women learned to organise:
Setting-up and running the soup kitchens were organisational
masterpieces. With most primitive means, with little money and little
support from the union hundreds of meals (in Easington about 500!)
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 44had to be prepared and given out daily. Sometimes the women did
not believe themselves that they could do it. A woman from
Easington recorded her doubts in a diary. Heather Wood said:
"...she's got in her diary 'Our Heather', that's 'cause she's me cousin,
'Our Heather says we can start kitchens to provide meals for the
miners. I think she's crackers. We'll never do it.' That was how the
women felt, they never felt they could organise to do something, you
know: 'Weak, little creatures like us, we can't do something like
that'." (H.Wood). But they did it very successfully for the families and
for themselves. Once "they saw they could serve, provide meals,
three, four, five hundred people a day, they just said: 'Oh well, we
can do this as well. We can progress. We can go on the next step all
the way'. It was great to see, you know." (H.Wood).
Soup kitchens were predominantly female dominated:
In the Miners' Strike of 1984/85, quite unlike former national miners'
strikes, the soup kitchens were set up and run almost exclusively by
women. This "did not require the difficult process of being accepted
by and working within a ready-made male structure."
(J.Coulter / et.al.: 216). Suddenly the women had an organisation and
a forum of their own in the male dominated communities.
Housework was brought into public view:
Though the soup kitchens in the beginning were a mere extension of
women's role as housewives they led the women to think about just
this: "Bringing the servicing of individual men in the home out into
the public arena has made women understand more clearly their own
roles as housewives and how women's lives are privatized"
(J.Coulter / et.al.: 211).
The soup kitchens were women's first step out of insignificance. "Food
distribution may be a traditional feminine task, but where women have
organised it from the beginning it has given them the strength and aspiration
to become involved in other aspects of the strike." (S.Jackson: 9). Especially
younger women quickly turned to other activities, picketing for instance.
4.3.2.2 PicketingSoon after the strike began women also went picketing, again to give
practical support to the miners. Their interest had often been aroused in the
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 45soup kitchens: "Then they decided that, because of what was going on the
picket line - they were hearing all, you know, stories from the men of what was
was going on the picket line - and they wanted to see for themselves."
(H.Wood). What women saw and experienced there had consequences for
them:
Women met with violence:
One of the strike's main characteristics was the police violence. The
"government is far better prepared than ever in the past to face a
major confrontation with key industrial workers.[...] The will to
repress totally was there. What was absent, even in 1972 and 1974,
was the means to do so. The new coordination and power of the
police in confronting mass picketing and industrial disruption mark a
profound historical change.[...] Historically, every British
administration since that of Lloyd George has tried to operate on the
basis of some form of consensus, reformist legislation and social
peace. Even Neville Chamberlain was a wettish Tory at home. The
Thatcher government, by contrast, is openly committed to reversing
long-held bipartisan social and economic policies." (K.Morgan: 284).
At first the police was reluctant to treat women as they treated men
but they soon grew accustomed with women's presence on picket
lines and no longer restrained themselves. Sexually abusive
language, arrests, strip searches and physical force against women
became the women pickets' everyday experience. Patricia Heron in
the introduction to her diary: "I myself was a victim at the hands of
the police on a women's picket line. I was pulled out the picket line
and punched and thrown to the ground. I lost consciousness, when
I came round there was policeman on top of me, a friend of mine
tried to pull him of me she was thrown to the ground too."
(P.Heron: 3)17. This was a completely new experience for the women.
Unlike the men they had been brought up to be non-violent, to be
weak and depend on men's strength "and indeed this is an important
way of controlling women, both inside and outside the home: we
must keep off the streets at night; we mustn't go out alone and so
on. This threat is a way of confining women to the home and
preventing us from carrying out an independent existence"
(J.Coulter / et.al.: 207).
17 See appendix for the introduction to Mrs.Heron's diary.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 46Violence on the picket lines helped women to see these problems.
The mass media:
For weeks and months the mass media published reports and
pictures of violent miners and beaten police. They hardly showed
what really went on on the picket lines or what the women
experienced. After the women's rally in Barnsley, for instance, "all we
received from the media were shots of women kissing Arthur
[Scargill]: They didn't show the hall packed solid with women singing
and chanting, women in action. It was too threatening, working class
women getting organised, when we are brought up to be passive and
think we have one role in life." (K.Mackay; quoted in V.Seddon,
1986 a: 55). This made the women angry but it also showed them
how the media could distort reality. Women who had always believed
the media became more doubtful about reports of the strike but also
about other topics, e.g. CND, the inner city riots, Ireland, and so on.
They gradually developed a political awareness.
Women experienced sexism:
In some ways women on picket duty were treated like men. In other
respects, however, they felt that their sex had an influence on the
way they were treated. Sexually suggestive remarks from the police
became routine for the women: "All the women who picketed tell
graphic stories of abuse by the police. In Hucknall [Nottinghamshire]
women were told, 'If you need money for your kids, go on the streets,
you'd make good whores. You're all cows, all of you.'" (J.Witham: 64).
The women were also discriminated against by the miners: "Miners
going to work have exposed themselves in front of the women and
have not been arrested." (J.Witham: 64). Less spectacular but just as
sexist was the miners' opinion of women going on picket duty. They
often thought women should not do picket duty at all. Women were
helped sometimes by bail conditions which often forbade miners to
picket again. The sexism of the strike sharpened women's sensitivity
for sexism elsewhere in society and it made contact with the feminist
movement easier. It was only natural that women wanted to be
treated as equals.
4.3.2.3 Fund-raising and public speakingThe miners' bad financial situation during the strike - the state deducted
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 47£15 (later even £16) strike pay which the miners never got from their
allowance - made it necessary to financially and materially support them. The
support groups, especially the Women's Support Groups, made this their
task - a task for which sufficient funds were necessary. Women quickly learned
that a lot of public relations work had to be done. Usually they started
collecting money, food, clothes or other things in their own villages but soon
invitations came from sympathising groups from all over the country and from
radio and television stations which not just wanted to materially support the
miners but also wanted first-hand information about the situation in the
mining-communities. This put new tasks to the women.
Public speaking:
"Frauen, die bisher kaum über ihre Dörfer herausgekommen waren,
reisten im Land umher [...], sprachen vor Massenversammlungen -
auch im Ausland." (H.Dirkes / S.Engert: 24)18. It must have been the
necessity of this task which gave them enough courage to do so.
"I didn't know what I were doing. [...] I just stood up and said we were
dead hungry and wanted all the support we could get. I said we had a
Centre set up and that we needed money and food. [...] You know
when I was speaking I was ever so nervous but after I finished I felt
quite good, in fact I felt exhilarating. I was fair pleased with myself."
(L.Beaton: 97-98). After women had been quite afraid of speaking
publicly they soon became more confident: "You know, I remember
one woman, she - we asked her to speak at a big rally in
Middlesborough - and she's as quiet as a mouse, she was really
terrified, and she got up and she, she only said four words. That was
her speech. She said: 'I am a member of the NUM, me and my
husband have twelve pound a week to live on, we have two children.
Please help us.' That was all she said, but it was sincere what she
said and it was the truth and, I mean, she got a standing ovation.
People could tell she'd never spoken before. She was on radio, the
lot. Now, to her, she was a different person after that." (H.Wood).
Making contacts:
To raise funds women had to travel all over the country and even
abroad. They met other people and groups and ended their isolation
in the mining-communities. The women were supported and invited
by Labour Party groups, CND groups, unemployed people, lesbians,
18 For a translation see appendix.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 48gays, the peace movement, or other women's organisations. These
contacts brought new experiences - women learned about other
people's problems, their opinions, beliefs or lifestyles - and opened
new horizons for the women who began to see clearly how their own
situation was linked to the situation of the people they made contact
with. They also became interested in problems far more distant:
nuclear arms, Ireland, Chile, South Africa, pollution, or the
Third World. Shirley James from South Wales: "'Before the Strike
I never thought about CND or nuclear weapons. But now I have been
to Greenham Common and we've had people from France and Japan
staying with us. Before the strike I believed what the papers said
about the union and about the Greenham women. Things have
changed.'" (G.Goodman: 91).
4.3.2.4 Strength from GreenhamClose co-operation and connections developed from the contacts with
support groups outside the mining-communities. Women's Support
Groups organised twinnings with cities or universities and planned
joint activities like the 'Mines Not Missiles' marches from nuclear
power stations to collieries. They supported each other in their fight
against common enemies and for common aims.
Contacts with the women from Greenham Common were especially
important. Greenham women did not support the miners' strike from
the beginning: coal was seen as being unecological, working
underground as inhuman and only when the Greenham women saw
that the miners were being injured and arrested wrongfully by the
police and that the communities suffered they began to support
them. For the Greenham women contacts with the mining-
communities meant they could spread their ideas and beliefs, but it
meant that these - usually middle-class - women could extend their
range of experience.
For the women in mining-communities the contacts with Greenham
were even more important: On the one hand they gained practically
from them. The Greenham women could draw on a large amount of
experience as far as dealing with the police or the media, fund-
raising, keeping out of the cold or surviving the lack of food were
concerned.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 49Most important, however, was the confidence the Greenham women
gave the miners' wives: these women had already run their camp at
the Cruise Missile base for about three years and they still seemed to
be in good spirits despite constant reprisals against them.
On the other hand women underwent a learning process which
should prove invaluable to them: The nuclear threat became very
real for them, they met feminists and realised "that they were not
alone in their conflicts with men and they saw more clearly the
problems of other women in organising politically and the wider
aspects of women's oppression which link them together"
(S.Miller: 361).
Ann Suddick from Durham about the newly made contacts and
experiences: "'This is the emergence of a new socialism. We've been working
with lesbians and gays and black people. The Indians in the Midlands were
powerful! It's the only way forward, this.'" (B.Campbell, 1986: 282). Even if the
links should not prove lasting, "the memory of them will survive both in
individual and collective memory, to be used again in future struggles."
(H.Britten: 10).
4.3.2.5 WritingWomen did not want to leave it to the individual to remember the strike
and women's activities in the strike. They produced written records of their
impressions of the strike and also of their feelings, their worries, fears,
problems, and hopes. "The strike opened up a whole new theatre of self-
expression" (R.Samuel, 1986 b: 29): poetry and prose, bulletins and
newsletters, broadsheets and graffiti, comics and cartoons, stories, songs, and
diaries were produced during and after the strike.
Write to share the crisis:
Heather Wood once told the women of the Easington Women's
Support Group: "'When you're away from the meeting, if you feel bad
or you feel good, write down your feelings and bring them to the
meetings on the Thursday'."(H.Wood). Writing was meant to - and
did - relieve the enormous pressure which rested on the women and
thus helped to keep up the morale. It also reaffirmed the women in
their aims, encouraged them to go on with their work and gave them
hope for victory: "The public language of the strike was one of hope,
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 50encouragement and reassurance. People said what needed to be
said. They refused to give voice to doubt, or to admit to signs of
weakening." (R.Samuel, 1986 b: 31). Writing also was and is a means
of communication. Bulletins or newsletters, which were produced by
a number of Women's Support Groups, "keep people in the group
informed and can be used to present the arguments for the strike"
(Solidarity with the miners: 22). Like the meetings of the Women's
Support Groups they could also bring individual women's problems
into public view or even offer solutions for these problems, spread
ideas about sexism and feminism, and present arguments for
women's equality.
Publications:
By far not all which was written during and after the strike was
published or written to be published. Of those works which were
published usually only a small number of copies was produced and
often they were available only locally or even through the authors.
Yet the publication of their works gave the women self-confidence: it
confirmed the importance of their problems and feelings and gave
them permanence as well. It also was a kind of pioneering work:
women in mining-communities had hardly ever published anything
before!19. In the North East of England a wide range of different
publications was produced by the women: there have been
collections of poetry (e.g. R.Forbes / D.Smithson), broadsheets
(e.g. The Girls From S.E.A.M.), collections of stories and poems
(e.g. The Last Coals of Spring), records with some of the women's
songs (e.g. Heroes; Which Side Are You On), even a play (M.Pine).
Very important for the women themselves were those publications
which recorded the history of the strike and of the women's activities
(e.g. S.Graham; G.Newton)20. The women did not share Bella Jolly's
opinion that the women's movement would go down in history as the
labour movements' finest achievement, and rightly so: "...women on
picket lines, women defying authority, women saying no is not a new
phenomenon. It has always occured but - and this may be the most
significant 'but' known to the modern historical research - whilst
19 Lydia Fish set out to investigate the folklore of the mining-communities, but she does not mention a single song or narrative written by a woman! (L.Fish)20 History was also recorded in many of the poems, in diaries, etc. (cf. P.Heron; see Appendix)
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 51those who have been the source of the oppression that women
fought against also wrote the histories, formed political parties, ruled
nations of headed households, that fight could never be given
recognition, let alone status." (WCCPL: 25). The experiences of the
1984/85 miners' strike only confirmed this fact. The work of the
Women's Support Groups was almost completely ignored outside the
left press21. And "even socialist journals have described women's role
in terms of the 'community' response in mining areas - women as
part of the 'wives and family' category." (J.Grayson: 4). Therefore the
women took writing the history of the strike and of their own
activities in hand, mainly 'For the Children'. Pat Heron: "...you will be
reading about the 1984-85 N.U.M. Stike in your history books in
school. You will not however read all the facts, and what realy
happend.[...] It is for this reason I have kept a diary so you will be
able to show your children what realy did happen." (P.Heron: 1; see
appendix). For the women writing their own history appeared to be
the only chance of their work being recorded and documented and
not to be neglected in "the mighty volumes of formal miners'
histories." (D.Douglass, 1981: 67). And for this it was "an important
step in consolidating what has been learnt." (D.Massey /
H.Wainwright, 1985 b: 8-9).
4.3.2.6 Other activitiesPart of the support work of the Women's Support Groups was to meet
regularly. But apart from talking business, the meetings often were "a forum
for discussing each other's problems, for sharing fears and hopes"
(WCCPL: 47). They also served as a kind of outlet for the women: "We were at
the kitchens,[...] out fund-raising, attending meetings and rallies, so they more
or less lived together. So obviously tempers were strained and there used to
be arguments and that. I remember saying: 'We cannot argue! We've got a
fight here. So what we've gotta do is, at our meetings on a Thursday night, say
what you feel in the meeting. Argue like mad if you want but once you go out
of the meeting, we're friends, we're together.'" (H.Wood). Women learned to
discuss and to argue politically. "The women exchange stories about the men's
reaction to what they are doing." (L.Loach, 1984: 7). New topics like
chauvinism, sexism, or the equality of women were talked about.
21 A look at the bibliographies makes this very clear. E.g. A.Green; the bibliography issued by The Library, Bessacarr Site, Doncaster; or the bibliography to this thesis.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 52All in all the meetings of the Women's Support Groups like all the other
activities helped the women "to find their own place in the political struggle,
instead of hibernating, lonely and hungry at home." (B.Campbell, 1984 a: 10).
Very important for the women in mining-communities was the foundation
of Women Against Pit Closure -groups which are nationally organised as
National Women Against Pit Closures (NWAPC).
The aims of this organisation are
- to promote and develop education for working-class women- to become active on issues which effect the mining-communities (unemployment, health service, education, peace, nuclear power, etc.)- to enhance the relationship between the organisation and the National Union of Mineworkers- to support the miners in their struggle against pit closures.
National Women Against Pit Closures still exists and regularly produces
newsletters (Coalfield Woman)22.
4.3.2.7 Concluding remarksWomen who - up to the strike - saw themselves as nothing but
housewives and mothers organised activities which could potentially alter their
roles in their marriages, at home, in the community, and in society.
"For the women of the village action groups the strike was a huge
learning process, a chance to exercise new skills, an introduction to
public life. Wives and mothers stepped out of the kitchen to become
organisers and entrepreneurs, almoners and welfare officers,
clothiers and catering managers. The strike was a school of writing, a
training in administration, an apprenticeship in political skills. It
initiated them into the mysteries of committee work, it gave them
the confidence to speak on public platforms; it opened up a whole
range of male preserves." (R.Samuel, 1986 b: 29-30).
Women entered areas from which they traditionally had been excluded,
but instead of working within men's organisations they founded their own,
which fitted to their aims and tasks. Women's activities were not long
restricted to "merely servicing those 'actively' involved" but they widened
their fields of activity and "developed a political style whereby active
involvement and positive education go hand-in-hand to develop and support
22 See appendix.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 53each other. This process has led to a positive evaluation by miner's wives of
their value as women." (S.Taylor: 80).
They often had to fight, however, against men's resistance: Suddenly the
women dominated the community, they organised pickets (up to then a male
domain in the mining-communities) or the men had to do the housework while
their wives were out organising. Thus women's activities represented a
"challenge to the dominance of men in working class culture." (J.Coulter: 205).
In the public of the support group, the community, and the wider support
movement the women realised how they were oppressed and exploited and so
this women's movement became a struggle for their equality, became a real
working-class women's movement and as it encouraged women outside the
mining-communities it could have an influence on or even include those
women who had not become active during the strike because "the women who
were collectively active in supporting the miners' strike have been a minority
of the women in the coalfields." (V.Seddon, 1986 b: 12).
4.3.3 A re-run of the past ?Much has been written about the similarities and the differences of this
miners' strike with former strikes, especially with the miners' lock-out of 1926:
Economic and political similarities, similarities in the course of the two
disputes, similarities between Arthur Scargill and Arthur J.Cook or in the
opposition from Nottinghamshire have been found. Differences in the position
of coal in Britain's economy, in the solidarity of the labour movement and in
other aspects were detected as well23. Differences and similarities of women's
involvement and activities are seldomly mentioned.
In 1984/85 it was not for the first time that women in mining-communities
organised support for their menfolk and their communities. There had been
soup kitchens before as well as conflicts between women and the police, but
that was about all: "Auch damals [1974] hatten wir Frauen unsere eigenen
Komitees. Die Suppenküchen sind traditionell üblich. Aber mehr wußten wir
damals nicht anzufangen. Deswegen gab es nach dem Streik für die Komitees
keine Perspektive, und wir lösten sie auf." (H.Dirkes / S.Engert: 27)24.
23 cf. e.g. M.Kettle: 24; G.Goodman: 13; K.O.Morgan: 283-284
24 For a translation see Appendix
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 54It was new, however, that women's involvement went far beyond the level
of practical support: they organised as women, they stood up and fought for
themselves. The women's support movement was the first real mass
movement of working-class women in Britain. The fact that the women
organised neither in a pre-existing structure, such as a trade union or a
political party, nor that they were dominated by middle-class people like
in 1926, was also a new feature of the Miners' Strike 1984/85. Also for the first
time the women challenged their oppression in the male dominated
mining-communities publicly and on a large scale. Whether or not women's
new position during the strike has had an effect on their role after the strike is
a different question: too often in the past women had to go back to what they
were before a revolution, a strike or a war.
4.4 Women's roles during and after the Miners' Strike 1984/85 In order to assess women's roles and the way women see themselves
during and after the strike it is necessary to find criteria which help to judge
whether there have been lasting changes at all and of what kind and extent
those changes are. Because of the short time since the strike it is not easy to
get enough objective data like statistical material or even primary documents.
Therefore mostly statements by people involved will be analysed. Statements
by other people will only additionally be considered.
Roles people play in their respective surroundings (here the miners'
families and the mining-communities) are not entirely observable and
describable - they are also manifest in people's attitudes, values, opinions, and
beliefs. These can be recorded only through long-term studies or in personal
documents. Personal documents' crucial advantage is "that it provides an
interpretation of life as lived in a setting very different from that of a
university (and indeed very different from that within the experience of {too}
many people within universities)." (M.Bulmer, 1972 ??: iii). Robert E.Park
described the value of personal documents even more vividly. He talked of a
"blindness each of us is likely to have for the meaning of other people's lives.
At any rate what sociologists most need to know is what goes on behind the
faces of men, what it is that makes life for each of us full or thrilling...
Otherwise we do not know the world in which we actually live." (R.E.Park: vi-
vii; quoted in M.Bulmer, 1972 ??: iii). Personal documents allow insight into
areas of human life which otherwise remain inaccessible to outsiders.
According to Martin Bulmer one has to obtain reliable data in order to meet
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 55scientific requirements. Bulmer: "...there is some evidence that people do
recall fairly clearly the main events in which they themselves were personally
involved, and which are part of their own biography." (M.Bulmer, 1972 ??: v).
Secondly the representativeness of the data has to be guaranteed. "This is
unlikely to be satisfied in any single personal document, and the best
safeguard is the comparison of several documents from different points of
view on the same problem." (M.Bulmer, 1972 ??: v).
Similar documents and additional statements from outsiders have to be
used as well in order to qualify the interpretations of individual people:
personal opinions, values, and beliefs can thus be assumed to be generally
valid for the mining-communities.
4.4.1 What the men thought...Looking at the mining-communities it should be clear that women's roles
are umbilically linked with men: their position in the home, in the community,
or in political organisations. Therefore it is not insignificant to know if and to
what extent men were able and willing to tolerate or even to make women's
changes possible and support them. After all men had to give up part of their
power - at home and in the community.
This chapter will look at how men saw women's activities and women's
roles in the strike. Their attitudes become visible in these areas: The union's
and the Labour Party's attitudes towards the women and at home.
The union and the women
With the emergence of the Women's Support Groups and the
extension of their activities to other areas than providing food, the
miners' union had to accept that the women were taking over
responsibilities and tasks previously handled by the union.
Ann Suddick remarked that "'it was initially difficult to get the men to
accept that we were part of the strike.'" (B.Campbell, 1986: 269). So
there was opposition against the women and therefore they had to
fight on two fronts: To fight for their communities they had to fight
the men as well. The NUM's25 resistance took various forms. On the
one hand it tried to hinder the women's work: The women often met
with opposition when they attempted to co-operate with the union.
25 If the NUM or the union is mentioned here it means the union officials and not necessarily its rank and file!
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 56Florence Anderson reported of such an attempt: "'You're not allowed
in the union meeting. Stand by the door; we're not ready for you
yet.'" (J.Stead: 115). Another woman: "'They told us we couldn't do
this and we couldn't do that [...]. And they'd say "How dare you
interfere in our area! We don't want you in our area; you're all right
in the kitchen".'" (J.Stead: 116). The women from Easington made
similar experiences: "I mean, the first union meetin' we went to to
say 'We're startin' a support group. This is what we're gonna do.',
they made us wait outside. The second one they allowed us in and I
remember standin' at the door and lookin' down the table at the
chairman of the committee and saying to him 'Have you had a vote?'
'No.' 'Because once you've taken this decision, mind, to let us in,
there's no goin' back. We're not going back after the strike's over.'
And they were just laughing." (H.Wood). Or: "There were times when
the unions came in and said 'You can't do this' or 'You can't do that.'
And we said 'Who says like?' you know, 'this is our committee, you're
in the union - we run what we're doing'." (H.Wood).
On the other hand there were attempts from the union to take
command of the Women's Support Groups and to take on certain of
the women's tasks. "During this strike, in the north east, the men
were careful to remain in charge. In Hetton during the strike, 'The
orders just came from above. There were no joint meetings. They
didn't say "We're doing this, we need your support." If they had
anything on they wanted organised it was like the tablets of stone
coming down. And that grieved us a wee bit, because we felt the men
weren't regarding us as equals.'" (J.Stead: 115). Heather Wood about
the Christmas Appeal: "on the morning we were cooking the
Christmas dinner and supposed to be giving the turkeys out the
union landed - we'd raised the money, we'd bought the turkeys - the
union came and said 'Our men are sitting and giving the turkeys out!
Not because we're concerned that everything was fair.' But the union
had to be seen to be doing its bit [...]. So we said, I remember I put
me pen down, I says 'Right! You wanna organise that? You organise
the rest! You can find the food, you ought to find the people to cook
it, and do the lot!'[...] Sure enough, after five minutes the union came
over and said 'We're going and we let you go on with it.'" (H.Wood).
As they did in this case women usually had their way against the
union, they had the upper hand: "they knew they had to keep us
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 57happy. They had to give us what we wanted. Otherwise, you know,
the strike would have failed.[...] And, I mean I know, in the back of
their minds, 'cause I'm knowin' them all, they've been saying 'When
the strike's over it'll just go back to normal', you know, 'we'll be
dominant again'." (H.Wood). This attitude could be traced all through
the union's hierarchy. On the International Women's Day rally at
Chesterfield Stadium on 9 March, 1985, only four days after the end
of the strike, Arthur Scargill announced in front of
about 25,000 women that the NUM would "commemorate their
contribution with a plaque in the lobby of the union's new
headquarters. But he did not endorse the women's movement as
such, or that dynamic sexual revolution." (B.Campbell, 1986: 250).
The women's efforts to gain associate membership in the NUM were
also turned down26 despite Scargill's approval.
There have, however, been signs of improvements in the relationship
with the union: In October 1984 the editor of the NUM paper 'The
Miner' agreed to putting a women's page in 'The Miner'. Freda Dean
from Philadelphia and Pat Curry from Murton, both canteen workers
and NUM members, were elected lodge committee members
in 1986 - the first in the country! (cf. The Durham Miner: 3). It
probably needs a lot of such tiny steps but it mostly needs a younger
generation of NUM leaders before women get associate membership
and before women NUM members are treated like their male
colleagues.
Women and the Labour Party
Before the strike 88% of the women who were active in support
groups in the Easington District voted at general elections. Out of
these almost 98% voted Labour! (cf.M.Metcalf: 26). After the strike,
however, the percentage of women who would vote for Labour fell
to 84%. Mark Metcalf quotes some of the reasons the women gave
for this phenomenon: "'The Labour Party hasn't helped us, both
locally and nationally, 'no interest', 'no help either locally or
nationally', 'not convinced of Labour Parties support'" (M.Metcalf: 27).
Women were supported by Labour Party groups outside the mining-
communities but to assess the attitudes of men in mining-
communities it is necessary to look at the Labour Party's attitudes
26 Except in Scotland.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 58there: In the coalfields the Labour Party was reluctant to support the
miners and the Women's Support Groups. The women saw this quite
clearly. Heather Wood: "I wasn't getting permission from the Labour
Party to do the things I was doing. But it goes back to what I said to
you before, I don't like red tape and I don't think we should have to
go and ask. You should be able to do things on the spur of the
moment. And I wasn't hurting the Party. In fact I did good for the
Party, we got more votes [...]. But [...] I used to get flak from Labour
Party members, especially the men" (H.Wood). In Hetton the
situation was hardly different. Florence Anderson: "'In fact, we got no
help from the Labour Party in Hetton at all. All we had from the
Hetton Labour Party, in a mining community, was half the proceeds
of a dance held in November, and we contributed to that because we
all went along there and sat at the back and were never even
mentioned. I think the Labour Party wasn't more involved because
the miners' wives got together and took the lead from the start.'"
(J.Stead: 29).
And Edith from Horden said that "'the strike has opened my eyes to
some of the local Labour Councillors. Even the one's on strike have
done nothing for us'." (M.Metcalf: 28).
Neither union nor the Labour Party - both male dominated - tried to
politically represent women and their problems and they thus missed the
chance to attract new members on a large scale from the ranks of the women.
It will now take a long time and a lot of commitment from the women to gain
some influence in the Labour Party or in the union.
Equality at home?
In many households the strike had severe consequences: While the
women were out organising the men had to do the housework. "They
learned about solitude and the self-discipline and domestic skills
needed for running a home, and they also, for the first time, learnt to
enjoy their children." (J.Stead: 31). Many men did not accept the role
changes and quite a number of marriages broke up. Others, however,
were strengthened. Although it seemed to be hard for him
Patricia Heron's husband had to get used to his wife becoming more
self-confident and independent. Patricia: "got to know about a
Women's Rally down London. I would love to go. It's in August, but
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 59I don't know if Alby will let me go, I don't think he realy likes the idea
of me realy getting involved. He can't get used to the idea of him
watching the bairns, while I go out to meetings and going to the
kitchen as well. He is just not used to sitting in while I am out. 2 yrs
ago I would not of dreamed of saying I'm of to London for a couple of
days, pet!!! I Like It For once he relises I am not just his little wife
who cooks and cleans up after him, I am Pat, who can hold a
conversation with other people." (P.Heron: 11).
Men were forced to assume new roles, they just had to accept it.
Many did and saw the positive effects for themselves and for their
marriages. A miner from Maerdy: "I should say about 90 per cent of
the women changed since the strike started. Before, you felt you
were just the person who went home on a Friday night with the pay
packet. There was just nothing to look forward to, nothing to talk
about.[...] Now we read the newspapers, think a lot about world
affairs we see on television, and think maybe we can change things."
(J.Stead: 39).
Many of the men treated the women with a new respect. For the first
time they saw more in them than just the housewives or mothers.
Others did not: "I was in Welfare Hall one night selling raffle tickets
and I went up to this table and a man was saying 'Bloody women!
They're all stupid!' And he turned round, he saw me, he says 'Except
you!' Now, that 'except me' is because I am doing something
different to his wife. His wife stays at home, looks after the family,
doesn't speak up for herself, takes notice of everything he says"
(H.Wood). Far less men thought of women's change of roles as
positively as they thought of their support work. Often the women
were only tolerated for the time of the strike which the much used
phrase 'going back to normal after the strike' proves. In the
Easington Support Group there were some women "whose husbands
quite regularly said 'Oh, we'll be going back to normal after the
strike, mind. She's only doing this now!' And that did happen in some
cases." (H.Wood). Heather felt men's disapproving attitude herself:
"I mean, sometimes when you meet some men they'll say 'Ah, here
she comes', you know, Women's Lib and all this and you'll know that
they dislike you because you're not just going out yourself, you're
pushing them, their wives and their girlfriends, to do exactly the
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 60same as you're doing. So they see you as the badie. Some men who
don't care but some see you, you know, to be the influence, the bad
influence, you know." (H.Wood).
As should be clear by now men's attitudes were very diverse. Equality has
not often been achieved until today but that is only natural: the miners have
been brought up to be dominant, to be the bread-winners and to see women
as being inferior. But the women are aware of this problem and they handle it
their way. Susan Petney: "'We are sort of re-educating them slowly. They are
not liking it a lot. [...] But slowly they are coming round to it. They don't call us
'ladies' any more. They call us women. That's a start.'" (J.Stead: 40). A lot
remains to be done to change men's attitudes.
4.4.2 Women's words and women's rolesIn the preceding chapter all the quotations but one were by women. This
is not a coincidence! It reflects quite well the proportion of men's accounts of
the strike. Women produced a lot more. In this chapter women's own accounts
of the strike and their roles before and during the strike as well as their plans
and outlooks for the future shall be analysed in order to find out more about
women's roles and about the way they see themselves. The importance of
using personal accounts has already been explained; the following quotation
only confirms this.
Jean Heaton27, a miner's wife, said: "Now I'm thirty-two I suppose I'm
just a housewife still to look at me from the outside. But inside I'm a
very angry person, and I shall stay angry until we've got rid of this
rotten Government and the rotten system it makes us live under."
(T.Parker: 128).
This quotation shows very vividly the importance of looking beneath the
surface.
Two main types of accounts are of importance here:
1. Accounts which have been exclusively made by the women themselves or
for which the idea came from them. These were mainly those accounts already
mentioned: poetry and prose, bulletins and newsletters, posters and graffiti,
27 This is not her real name. In his book Red Hill Tony Parker did not use people's or places' real names in order to obscure their identity. Red Hill probably stands for Horden, Co.Durham.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 61comics and cartoons, stories, songs, letters, diaries, and histories. They show
what the women consider most important for themselves or for others to know
or notice. It has to be kept in mind that these accounts have come almost
exclusively from that minority of women in the coalfields who were active
during the strike.
2. The second type of accounts are those the women produced in co-operation
with people from outside the mining-communities, the idea not coming from
the women. These were mostly interviews. Apart from being able to convey
the women's opinions, attitudes, etc. they offer the advantage that the
interviewer could direct the women's attention purposely to aspects the
women might not have thought of themselves. It was also possible to
interview those women who not actively supported the strike28. It must not be
forgotten, however, that, when published the interviews may not come out
quite the way they were intended by the interviewees!
4.4.2.1 Topics. or What they had to sayDuring and after the Miners' Strike 1984/85 women in
mining-communities have written about a wide range of topics. Some,
however, have been especially well covered.
In women's poems and stories these were:29
1. Margaret Thatcher and Tory policy2. The police3. The children's and the communities' future4. The legitimacy of the miners' cause and the miners' bravery
At first sight these topics do not reveal a new way of seeing oneself and
even less a change of roles. It should not be forgotten, however, that women
from mining-communities for the first time considered their opinions and
problems important enough to be written down and even to be published. This
has to be regarded as a new self-confidence and as an essential step towards
emancipation.
It has also to be kept in mind that poems were often read out in support
group meetings or at public rallies in order to confirm their aims and to make
them more determined in their daily work. Here the poems served as an outlet
28 However, although these women formed the majority of the women in mining-communities they were seldomly interviewed.29 Examples are printed in the Appendix.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 62for women's problems, their anger and their fears.
Other kinds of publications cover a different range of topics. Diaries for
instance deal more with personal problems, positive and negative experiences
in the support groups, with politics, the writers' future, and a lot more. All in all
diaries provide a picture of their writers which is quite authentic30.
For the assessment of women's roles and of the way they see themselves
it is most interesting to look at statements which directly comment on this.
Patricia Heron wrote in her diary: "I don't know if it is the strike but suddenly
I find myself thinking very militant also for once in my 15 yrs of mariage I am
not just 'our lass'. I am Pat" (P.Heron: 9). Or: "I am sure of one thing I will not
go back to them days again" (P.Heron: 11). Women's stronger self-confidence
becomes visible in 'Not By Bread Alone' as well. Scene five of the first act
shows that they knew quite well of their pioneering role: "JOAN [...] Mind you,
we've made history. Must be the first women to have actually got into the
union room." (M.Pine: 14). In scene ten of the first act it becomes clear that
the women will not give up what they had achieved:
"LIZ Never take a back seat again, will we! It's dead funny at
home. I come in and say where's my clean blouse and there it is.
SANDRA I don't know where anything is now in my house.
LIZ My silly bugger didn't like it at first. Hasn't made him any less
of a man.
JOAN Done a lot for us though, hasn't it?" (M.Pine: 47)
Women's wish to keep the newly gained equality, the newly gained self-
confidence and the newly gained position in the community becomes obvious
in the following: Shortly after the strike was over the women in 'Not By Bread
Alone' planned several activities for the time after the strike.
"JOANDon't forget, lasses, there's the trip to Greenham at the
end of the month... Very important - shut down coal,
develop nuclear power, by-products for the military. It's
all linked.
30 This may have induced Margaret Pine to chose Lorna Ruddell's diary as the basis for 'Not By Bread Alone'.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 63LIZ I'm ashamed to admit it, I once thought they were the
lunatic fringe.
EDNA Was that before or after we became lunatics.
JOAN And there's our book. We've got two meetings next week
with the Arts people. Is there anyone who still hasn't
given in their work." (M.Pine: 79)31.
Sheila Graham, Secretary of Brenkley Miners' Support Group, said her
group also had plans for the future: "We have a busy summer programme
[1985] ahead of us. After speaking at a local meeting of the National Assembly
of Women we are hoping to affiliate our group to this organisation. We have
rallies against pit closures to attend, fund-raising to continue, speeches to
make. Our fight goes on and on." (S.Graham: 31). She concludes her booklet
as follows: "THE END (No, it isn't!)" (S.Graham: 31)32.
Looking at the number of publications by women from mining-
communities it is surprising how little the women said about themselves, all
the more as the left or feminist press emphasised just this aspect of women's
involvement - women's new roles, their new equality, their new voice, etc. In
interviews with women from mining-communities, however, probably after the
interviewer directed the interviewee's attention towards this topic, the women
often said they would live a different life after the strike: "Most of us are not
prepared to fit neatly back into domestic life and fade into the background."
(Women fight for pits: 26). Annie Brooks said: "The whole business made me
much more of a thinking person: I could never go back to being like I was
before." (T.Parker: 113). And another woman: "'One thing is sure: we will not
be the same women we were before the strike.'" (Lambeth Women's Miners
Support Group: 33). This attitude was widely spread in the support groups.
Betty Heathfield, one of the support movement's central figures, summarised
women's opinions like this: "'Wir werden nicht zu dem zurückkehren, was wir
vorher getan haben, und nur im Haus bleiben und für die Kinder sorgen [...].
Wir werden andere Dinge tun und andere Dinge lernen.'" (H.Dirkes /
S.Engert: 25)33.
There also were more concrete statements. The women knew quite well
31 The book is 'The Last Coals of Spring'.
32 The final chapter of 'For the Children' is printed in the appendix.33 For a translation see appendix.
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 64about their roles before and during the strike. Jean Heaton for instance judged
herself thus: "You wouldn't think it to hear me now but I was a very quiet
person before. I looked after the house and my husband and my children,
some days I went to the shops, then I came back and did the housework and
cooked for them and kept the house neat and tidy and clean. [...] Just a
housewife, that's all I ever was was a housewife, right from when I left school
when I was fifteen." (T.Parker: 127-128). Pauline Street had led a similar life:
"Oh nothing like the strike time had ever happened to me before in the whole
of my life. It changed me completely. I was very quiet before, I wouldn't say
boo to a goose. I'd scarcely talked to anybody, I certainly wouldn't have been
able to sit here like this and talk to you, but I'd let you do all the talking,
I wouldn't be saying anything. The strike changed it all. It made me stronger
and have a lot more confidence in myself and my own opinions."
(T.Parker: 117). She also had clear plans for her future: "It made me that from
now on I wasn't just going to go along behind Alf through life, leaving
everything to him. I've got a contribution to make to life too, my own opinions
and my strength to add in with his." (T.Parker: 124).
Annie Brooks planned to educate herself: "Before the strike I was just for
my husband and the kiddies and my home, I never read a book, I never went
in to the library, and all I ever watched on the television was all those silly quiz
games and what do they call them, chat shows. I mean imagine a woman
who's got to my age [she was forty-five then] and if you'd asked her what
books she'd read in the last few years, about the only one she'd have been
able to think of was a book of mostly pictures of the Royal Wedding. That was
as far as my interest went in what went on in the world. [...] Now I feel I'm
much better informed about these things it helps me enjoy life more."
(T.Parker: 108, 113).
The question why women from mining-communities obviously did not lay
the stress on the emancipatory aspect of their involvement in the strike
remains to be answered. It may have been that they did not like to theorise
about feminist topics and like supporting the strike they 'just got on with'
emancipation. It may also have been that, in order to be able to theorise or -
to name another example - to work in a political party, women would have had
to learn the respective jargons. This accounts for the following statements: "I
don't call myself a political person, I've never understood the ins and outs of it
all" (T.Parker: 133). Or: "I'm not political because I've got no ideas about it and
I don't understand it." (T.Parker: 124). In the interviews these quotations are
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 65taken from both women incessantly talk about politics. And when
Pauline Street said she had no ideas about it and did not understand it, all she
probably meant was that she did not know the political jargon!
Maybe the established feminist movement expected too much of the
women in mining-communities: a radical change of the women's attitudes.
Pauline Street changed quite moderately: "I'm not a women's libber or
anything though: I'd say I'm sort of in the middle. But I am reading about
women's rights and all things like that, and taking a big interest in the subject.
[...] before the strike I'd never have given it a thought." (T.Parker: 122-123).
For Pauline Street's next statement another explanation must be found.
Pauline: "I always got back here in time for the bairns coming home from
school, then I was ready to give them their teas and do the washing and get
Alf's meal for when he came in." (T.Parker: 117). At first sight this attitude - on
the one side emancipation and on the other the husband comes first - is
incomprehensible. A look at the past, however, shows that in mining-
communities not only the women were exploited and "In their bones they had
always known they were exploited but they knew that at least their
exploitation paralleled that of the men they shared their lives with. That is why
miners' wives don't, on the whole, take their resentment of the past out on the
miners of the present. They complain about their husbands' prejudices but
they are setting out to change them - in between looking after the kids and
getting the meals ready for the end of the shift." (J.Stead: 28), and thus the
special quality of mining and of mining-communities found its expression in
the special quality of the women's emancipation.
4.4.3 Was it all over - when it was over ?It may be a long way from the intention to permanently change one's
situation to its realisation, especially if there are various obstacles to be
overcome. In the case of the women in mining-communities those obstacles
were the men whose hopes the women would return to the kitchen sink once
the strike was over have already been mentioned. Another obstacle were the
women themselves! Mark Metcalf found out that
"Exactly half of the women when asked; 'When the dispute is over
will you be returning to the way you lived before?' gave answers
which indicated that continuing to be involved in Community
organisations and activities was not likely to be important in their
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 66lives once the dispute had ended. 48% of this group want to return to
the way they lived before the dispute began, 12% did not know what
would happen and for 40% the major change in their lives would be
concerned with how they handled and spent their income. These
answers indicate that half of the women involved in S.E.A.M.
remained basically the same people as they were prior to the
dispute." (M.Metcalf: 32).
Only an insignificantly small number of women who were active during
the strike wanted to remain active.
A third and equally important obstacle for permanent change of roles was
the families' material position: During the strike many families had run into
debt which after the strike was a heavy burden for them. For the miners it
meant more overtime work and for the women to be bound to the house even
more.
There seems to be little hope for positive and permanent changes of
women's roles. What remained after the strike was over? How much did the
women, at least the active ones, keep of their freedom, their equality, and of
their power and how much did they lose again? Documents and statements
concerning these questions are very thin on the ground. Heather Wood
reported about Easington: According to her some of the women returned to
the same kind of life they led before the strike. "The men forced the wives to
go back to what they were. [...] I would say the vast majority of the women are
still out. We've got women, more women members of the Labour Party. In my
village - you know, I can only speak for mine now - we've got more women
who are standin' for a councillor at the local elections in May, you know, who
were members of the support group. So it has, it's achieved a lot I think.
They've realised they can organise, you know, that they have got a voice,
what they're sayin' isn't rubbish, you know, they can speak sense. They're
keepin' it up, it's great." (H.Wood). Heather's cousin Lorna Ruddell joined the
Labour Party: "I joined the Labour Party when the strike ended, but we moved
house during the strike + as you can well imagine it's been an uphill struggle
starting from scratch, so I haven't been as involved as I should + could have
been, but as I said to my mam, I was there when they needed me, I rallied to
the call, I still want rid of Thatcher, so who knows what's next for me to do?"
(L.Ruddell).
Heather again: "We're on all sorts of committees now within the
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 67community. We've got women who are on school government bodies
now. The last one I nominated, I says 'I'm gonna nominate you for a
parent representative on the school governors.' 'Hee, no, I cannot do
that!' I says 'Look at all the things you did in the strike. And
everything you said "I cannot do it!" and you did it. So don't tell me
you cannot go and sit on a school governors. You know what you
want out of the school as much as I know what I want.'[...] And now
they're sitting there and making contributions." (H.Wood).
Apart from such local activities there have been and still are regional and
national activities organised by women who were active in the mining-
communities. Some examples: "In Northumberland, members of the Women's
Support Group are joining the campaign against the Druridge Bay Power
Station." (D.Massey / H.Wainwright, 1985 b: 9). The political learning process
and the experiences with Greenham have borne fruit: The women not only
understood the links between nuclear power and pit closures, they translated
their knowledge into action.
In Durham something similar happened. There an organisation called
LINKS was founded:
"LINKS is a mixed group of women and men originating in women's
initiative in the Miners Support Groups in Durham. [...] The purpose
of LINKS is to enhance existing campaigns rather than to undermine
or mould any other group into a rigid format. Involvement in LINKS is
not commitment to a new bureaucracy but empowerment to take co-
ordinated action. Divided we fall - United we'll win." (LINKS: 5).
LINKS tries to connect the nation's and the world's major problems:
Starvation, unemployment, lost communities, coal, energy politics, nuclear
power, waste, South Africa, apartheid, the law, nuclear weapons, war, health,
or education.
"The aims of the Anti-Apartheid movement are directly linked with
the aims of the Peace movement which in turn are linked with the
anti-nuclear movement and groups striving to protect their
communities from mass unemployment or the dangers of pollution
and radiation from the transporting and dumping of poisonous waste.
These issues are locally and internationally linked with the way in
which society is economically and militarily dominated by
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 68multinationals and the interests of capital." (LINKS: 4)
This organisation arose from the experience that together women can
achieve a lot but on their own have little chance in their struggles "which we
know to be part of the same iceberg of exploitation, male violence and
capitalism." (LINKS: 2). For the Women's International Day for Disarmament on
May 23/24, 1987 LINKS, or WOMEN'S LINKS as it is also called, prepared a
number of activities "to demonstrate our power to defend ourselves and our
families." (WOMEN'S LINKS). The LINKS campaign also published a leaflet
about the dangers of the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 (LINKS Campaign), which
again shows their commitment in the field of nuclear power.
Women from mining-communities in the Northeast drew up a petition to
the European Parliament "over the EEC's withdrawal of subsidy. 'It's a
women's initiative, a women's coalfield petition. We took the initiative, we'll do
the lobbying, because we can mobilise. Don't underestimate these women.
The government did. The union did and they nearly got trampled on'", said
Ann Suddick. (B.Campbell, 1986: 287).
These were only some of the outstanding activities after the strike. Most
of the Women's Support Groups still meet regularly and "in many places [...]
they are just as busy with politics as they were during the strike." (B.Campbell,
1986: 297).
4.4.4 The future - Back into oblivion ?In both world wars women did - had to do - men's jobs in the families, in
the industry, in the administration, or in the arts. When at the end of the wars
most men returned home the women usually did the same. As has been shown
this did not in all cases happen after the 1984/85 Miners' Strike. Will the
changes the women underwent, however, be lasting? There are a number of
arguments for this assumption.
First of all, at the beginning of the strike the women were emotionally
ready to become active, to liberate themselves. All they needed was a push -
which the strike provided. Therefore the chances for them to remain active
long after the strike were and are good.
With the Women's Support Groups and with Women Against Pit Closures
the women created organisations which existed beyond the strike and offered
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 69the necessary backing for the support and extension of women's
achievements. Women furthermore made contacts with other women's
organisations which will "give confidence and solidarity to all women in
struggle" (Workers Power: 14) and secure this mass women's movements
existence beyond the struggles of individual groups.
"Hope for the future [also] lies in the sheer quantity and variety of forms
of expression used by, with and for the women, during and after the strike."
(A.John, 1986: 93). They also wrote their own history which can be judged as a
sign that women did not want their experiences and achievements to be
forgotten or distorted. "One may ask: 'aren't women's protests likely to be
submerged and forgotten once again? Much, of course, depends on who
provides the history and with what degree of sensitivity. There are some
encouraging signs. In 1984-85 women not only made speeches, they rejected
the principle of being spoken for" (A.John, 1986: 93).
The greatest hope for the future, however, lies in the children:
"It was the children under 12, particularly the girls, who threw
themselves into supporting the strike, eager to go on as many
marches as they could, collecting and exchanging badges and
stickers. One nine-year-old girl had at least 100 badges all over her
leather jacket. Small girls became extremely knowledgeable about
the NUM and about the pits. If you asked a girl's mother a question,
the odds were that the answer would come from the daughter before
the mother got a chance to say a word. Not only the miners' wives,
but also a whole generation of young women had been politicised."
(J.Stead: 87-88).
The daughters showed some pride in their mothers: "My daughter Jan felt
neglected. She was used to me looking after her, and with me being out all the
time some conflict was coming up. On the other hand I feel she was proud of
what I was doing for the Miners' cause." (M.Graveson: 2). P.Heron had a similar
impression: "...my daughter Louise, who is used to me being in the house
24hrs a day is very surprised but I think she is a tiny bit proud of her mam."
(P.Heron: 9). Suddenly the children saw their mothers organise, speak to large
audiences, travel all over the country and beyond, fight on picket lines, and so
on. They also saw their fathers, perhaps for the first time, do the housework34.
For once the traditional way of socialising the children has been interrupted
34 They may have beeen proud of them too, but nobody has written anything about that!
THE 1984/85 MINERS' STRIKE AND WOMEN'S ROLES 70and it may, at least in some families, never be taken up again.
CONCLUSIONS 71
5. Conclusions
Heather Wood summarised the strike's effect on the women in mining-
communities like this: "It was, I think the whole thing is, for women:
confidence. You know, you could sum it up in one word: confidence. It gave,
that's what it gave them. To me that was the most important thing." (H.Wood).
Women's activities and the roles they played in the Miners' Strike of 1984/85
gave confidence not only to those women who actively supported the strike
but also to those who were not active during the strike. Those who were active
- very very few indeed compared with the number of those who were not -
often changed considerably. They see themselves quite different than before
the strike, which became clear at a meeting at the Easington Miners' Welfare
where the Vice-President of the NUM, Mick McGahey, "addressed an audience
which contained a large number of women. He swept his arm across the front
row and referred to the 'housewives in the County who understand the
problems.' The first question was asked by one of these women. She made the
situation plain: `we no longer regard ourselves as "housewives"; we are
soldiers in the struggle.'" (H.Beynon, 1984: 109). Not only were the traditional
roles of women as housewives or mothers challenged on a large scale, the
strike also changed women's lives and consciousness. "It has shown them their
strengths and capabilities; it has extended their lives beyond the house where
traditionally women were confined" (J.Coulter / et.al.: 214), it has made them -
through struggle - political beings and has given them an identity which
previously had been denied them (women in mining-communities have always
been identified in relation to men and to the industry - as daughters, wives,
mothers, or widows of miners!).
New ideas and "insights into the world have been gained" (J.Coulter /
et.al.: 200), women built relationships with other women both within and
outside the mining-communities and they formed "the forefront of labour and
trade union struggles in a mass movement of women throughout Britain"
(S.Miller: 362) and, one may add, of a new kind of feminism - a feminism which
"was real enough [...], but it is not one which can be easily aligned to
metropolitan versions of it, and it took place within an exceptionally strong
system of family and kin solidarities." (R.Samuel, 1986 b: 28-29).
The Women's Support Groups not only influenced the women who were
active in the strike but also those who were not. To what extent this happened
is very difficult to say. It is not a question, however, that the Support Groups
CONCLUSIONS 72created a new atmosphere in the mining-communities - an atmosphere of
more equality and more respect for the women, of a higher sensitivity for
sexism and chauvinism. One can not expect male dominance to have
disappeared from the mining-communities altogether. The strike has,
however, "changed irrevocably women's consciousness of themselves,
challenged male working class culture and gender relations" (S.Miller: 363).
APPENDIX 73
6. Appendix
6.1 Diary of Mrs.Patricia Heron
My dear Christopher
by the time you read this diary, you will be old enough to have your own
opinions and principles and you will be reading about the 1984-85 N.U.M.Strike
in your history books in school. You will not however read all the facts, and
what realy happend. Louise my love you are 11yrs old now, and you may be
able to remember some things, but Christopher you are only 4yrs old, so you
will know nothing, it is for this reason I have kept a diary so you will be able to
show your children what realy did happen.
It started in March-84, the strike, but even before that we all knew in the
mining comunities that somthing would happen, when the Tory Government
led by MAGARET THATCHER (The iron lady) made Ian McGregger chairman of
the N.C.B. This man had already butchered the steel industry. Hence his
nickname by Mr Scargill (The Butcher).
Mr Scargill was President of the N.U.M. a powerful union, to be feared by
the Tory government. We got them out of power in 1974, led by Joe Gormley
and they always hated us for that. Magaret Thatcher was only a member of
that cabinet then, and she wanted Mr.Ted Heath, to fight us. I think it was
then, that she made her mind up to be prime minister one day, and to make
the miners suffer.
I have always tried to be honest with you and told you, to never be scared
of asking questions. I hope you will never forget that piece of advice. Your dad
was a `picket' he went on the picket lines, the day the strike started. I was left
at home, sitting worrying about how we we could get through this fight. We
had a `giro' for £16-30 pence from suplementy benifit and £13-70 pence
family allowence. This was all we had to live on £30 out of that I was putting
£1-50 per day into my electric meter, as I could not afford to pay my elevtric
bill of £83 and the N.E.E.B. were going to disconect our supply. So I had to
have a meter installed. So I usually spent about £9 per week on the meter.
That left about £21 out of that I had to buy food for the four of us, your clothes
and shoes, which you seemed to go through very quickly also I had to pay my
insurence, you must keep those up. I also had to give Louise money for school
APPENDIX 74every day, bus-fares and a few extra coppers in case she went over her
allotted 45p free meal ticket at school. I have told you your dad was on the
picket line, well you will have probably read about the vicious savage pickets,
and the damage they did and also about, the pickets intimidating the scabs.
But I wonder if you have read about the terrible beatens, and the intimidating
the pickets suffered at the hands of our great police force. I hope one day you
will read the true facts, about allgrove, where our brave young pickets were
kicked to the ground and ripped apart by the police dogs. The mounted police
charged in to the crowds of pickets and trampled our lads to the ground, the
police also used there trunchens they were beating our lads over the heads
and yet they were not stopped. These my dears are the true facts. I myself
was a victim at the hands of the police on a women's picket line. I was pulled
out the picket line and punched and thrown to the ground. I lost conciousness,
when I came round there was policeman on top of me, a friend of mine tried to
pull him of me she was thrown to the ground too. I tried to make a complaint
about his behaviour, but lucky for him he had no number on his jacket. So
I could not as you had to have a number. So after you have read the fairy-tales
in your books, spend a few minutes reading this diary and make your own
conclusions. I was also a chairperson of a miner's wives group Houghton-
Newbottle Fenchouses. I and a grand group of ladies, [here six names follow,
also a list of four women whose husbands were strikebreakers].
There were some other women, who worked with us, but I don't want to
say much about them as they went back to work. And they were
N.U.M.members, and I did feel a bitterness to-wards them. But there names
are wrote down as they were there when we started our kitchen up Newbottle-
Church hall. I suppose they had there own reasons for going back.It is them
who must live with there concious. Our next door neighbours were scabs, [...]
[they] had a lot of harrasment rom there youngest daughter D[...] but I told
L[...] it was her who could hold her head up high, and one day I don't know
when that may be, D[...] will be made to remember her father was a scab. If
this diary sounds bitter to you I am sorry my son, but you must remember, we
were fighting a hard fight, and our union was split down the middle by the
Nottingham Scabs. They did not support us. From the very beginning thy
made it clear they would not help us. I must be fair also and say there were
some very brave Notts miners who did come out on strike with us. And they
suffered terrible and we coud only stand by and do nothing as we were
fighting our own battle up here. It is now January 1985 and we have been on
strike nearly 11 long cold months and I fear the end may be at hand. The
APPENDIX 75government has just sat back and watch the miners drift back to work and I
fear there waiting game has paid off, already there is half the workforce in
Herrington pit where your dad is a striking miner. I don't know how this strike
will end but I do know this if you believe in a principle, then you must always
stand by it, never be afraid to stand up and say what you think always be true
to yourself. If you turn out to be half the man your dad is I know you will be a
good and fine person. Louise my sweet one, you went through this strike while
you were a young girl of 11yrs, you went with-out a lot of things, new clothes,
money in your little purse, and yet you hardly complained, because you knew
how we were struggling. I can only say I thank you from the bottom of heart
for being so understanding. You have grew up a lot in those 11mths. I have
wrote about. I will close this letter to you now. I don't think I will be writing any
more in my diary as I think the strike is nearly at an end. I think we have been
beaten by this uncaring government.
I love you, my dear children, always remember that. And remember we
tried to make a better future for you.
From your everloving mother.
Patricia Heron. `Mrs'
APPENDIX 76
6.2 Letter from Mrs McG. to W.S.Howard
Dear Sir,
To me the miners are among the Bravest and toughest men in the
country. I am now nearing sixty years of age I am the daughter, wife, and
mother of miners. My first recolection of my father was a big jolival man with a
small stump sticking out from his right shoulder I used to say when small
`dad? where is your arm.'he used to laugh and say I dropped it down the sink,
his workmates who went to hospital with him after he had been trapped down
the pit said he carried his right arm in his left hand hanging on by soft flesh,
the bone had been severed right through he did'nt make any fuss. he lived
until he was sixty two. My husband and his brother left school at fourteen went
straight into Pit House right on a hill at the top of our village it is'nt there now,
it was a large Pit in those days miners travelled miles to work there. The pit
was privately owned by a firm called Straker and Love the work was
dangerous and frightning for young lads my husband was ordered to do a job
one day underground he did'nt want to do it so was sent to the managers
office, You do it he was told or we sack you father what could he do his father
was the breadwinner. When my husband was nearly eighteen war broke out
he left the pit with his brother who was a year older his brother went into the
R-A-F, he joined the army. his brother died of war wounds aged twenty three
his war grave is in our local cemetery. My husband fought abroad he was
wounded in the arm and hand, he was in a big assualt on an island which was
occupied by the Japs the war ended ten months later our lads still held the
island. He came home and went back to Pit house. We were married and lived
in a colliery house with one bedroom, he used to work a shift where he came
in from work two in the morning I would have the tin bath on the floor water
hot in the set-pot a Jam pudding ready for him, I always washed his back all
you could see was the whites of his eyes his whole body even his eyelids and
eyelashes was covered in thick black dust he used to nearly always fall asleep
in that little bath-tin he ached from top to toe some nights I used to help him
upstairs to bed he was that exhausted as he was on what they called Piece
Work he finished the Pits as a deputy he is now nearly sixty five. My son has
jaust been moved from Epleton to Murton as his pit has closed. He stayed out
all through the strike and marched back behind his banner. He went picketing
all through the strike (peacefully). Iwill tell you about an incident, my son and
his mates set off at day-light one morning in the Picket van my lad Mick is Six
foot two sixteen stone, Charlie is a six footer heavier still, the there was Mushy
APPENDIX 77Tucker - Ken - Ray. they were on decent terms with our local bobbies, they al
had a bit push and used to laugh about it police as well this particular
morning they were driving along on their way to an open-cast. two Police cars
waved them down out stepped Police no numbers on their shoulers they all
had southern accents, out they shouted, line up along this pavement and don't
even move your eye-balls. They then stripped the van, cushions thrown out
flasks thrown across to other side of road with there sawndwishes. Now then
this little copper said to his men any of you want a piss and pointed into the
van before I let these F------- back in they all walked back to their cars
laughing. My son and his mates could have had them for breakfast, but what
would the headlines have been, Miners attack Police; Police only doing their
duty. that to me was another kind of bravery by not letting these Metropolitan
Police Provoke them. When Thatcher and McGregor call the miners the enemy
within I fill with hate. I am proud to have known my three miners. God Bless All
Miners this country is a better place by having men like them in times of stress
and times of peace.
Yours Truly
D.McG.
PS My men don't know I have written to you they would not approve.
APPENDIX 78
6.3 Final chapter of 'For the Children' We like rallies best. On March 23rd we marched in pouring rain through
the streets of Newcastle in protest at Margaret Thatcher's visit to Tyneside.
This day we will truly never forget; we have a beautiful little girl to remind us
always. Elaine Elliott was born, bringing with her so much love it makes us
almost, and I stress almost, envious.
We went along to Blyth recently to help fight the proposed closure of
Bates Colliery. Sadly it was discovered that morning that we wouldn't be able
to use our banner again. I'd had it standing upright in the garage beside the
door and until then hadn't known that the rain we'd been having had actually
soaked it. This had made the ink run and it was really shabby. So Bates really
was the last rally for our original banner.
With great determination we set about making a new banner; do we
sound like a group giving up or giving in? We had our photograph taken
making the banner and it was about to have its first proud airing at the
Northumberland Miners' Picnic in Bedlington on June 8th. We had our
photographs taken at this rally not only with our new banner, but alongside
the Brenkley N.U.M. banner.
We have a busy summer programme ahead of us. After speaking at a
local meeting of the National Assembly of Women we are hoping to affiliate
our group to this organisation. We have rallies against pit closures to attend,
fund-raising to continue, speeches to make. Our fight goes on and on.
It is 25th June, 1985 and it is ironic that I am concluding my story today
because today the N.C.B. have announced the proposed closure of Brenkley
Colliery in the summer of 1986 (at the rate the N.C.B. are closing pits we
cannot see it even lasting that long).
We are realistic; if there is no coal, and there isn't at Brenkley, our men
cannot dig it. One thing is certain. Whenever
APPENDIX 79Brenkley Colliery closes and the Brenkley N.U.M. banner is marched for
the last time to Burt Hall, our banners and our story of achievement will
proudly accompany it.
T H E E N D (No, it isn't!)
(S.Graham: 30-31)
APPENDIX 80
6.3 Poems The poems printed here will give an impression of the range of topics the
women wrote about. They wrote about the police, about Thatcher, the media,
nuclear arms, about men, children and about themselves.
Here is a selection of poems from the North East.
NUM strike 84/85
The fire's gone out and I'm feeling the coldI'll help saw the logs for I'm not that oldThe fire burns bright and I'm back full of fightBut we need some, coal, I'll go back down the hole.I fill the bag and sit with the riddleFor I've learned all the tricks of how to fiddleThe bitch in No. 10 will not getme downFor I've also learned how to play the clown.My heart is full of love and prideBut not when I heard Davy Jones had died.The hate simmered inside of meOh! why can't that bloody woman seeShe's tearing our hearts out by the rootsShe's even using the copper's bootsThe newsmen. the papers, and even the judgesWon't get our spirits down, wewon't let them budge us.
by Lily Ross (R.Forbes /D.Smithson)
APPENDIX 81
Atomic Reactors
It wasn't long since the big bombs had fallenWhen up popped our Maggie P.M.She'd come from her own little bunker,No room for the common men.
Well, Norman, she said, We've done it,Shame about the rest of the folkGo down and get my handbagWhilst you're there give the cabinet a poke.
To Reagan she said start rebuildingAnother great empire for me,Then we'll have to think about breedingBut you can get your hand off my knee.
I believe the month is SeptemberBy the end of the year I'll be QueenThere's no one left to remember,My enemy no more to be seen.
Come with me we'll get some workersThere'll be mutants left from the war,Make sure they know I'm their leader,I want them to bow to the floor.
I see some running towards us,Go welcome my subjects to court,I see they've got NCB coats onThis is better than I thought.
They seem to be singing my praisesLooks like my fame has spreadLike a Phoenix rose up from the ashes,They've come to put a crown on my head.
Can you see some chaps have slogans,They've raised them for me to see how high...Leon! That one on the left looks familiar,Oh no! Tell me it's a lie!
Why Maggie, tell me, said Ronnie,The reason you've gone so white,Are these rowdy lot your admirers,Not a welcome sight?
Then the crowd stood and faced Maggie,
APPENDIX 82Her last words were "Strike 84"The mutants marched over her body,Laughing as they sang "Here we go".35
Anonymous (R.Forbes / D.Smithson)
The Longest Strike
As weeks drag on we wonder whyThey are going to let our mines dieWe are only fighting for our rightsFight we say with all our mightDo we want to live in a finished communityNo we shout as we're all in unityDaughters and sons we all have nowFor a chance in life we fight and howWe must fight for them the chance to workFor you never meet a parent who's going to shirkFor why should children move and go awayThe choice should be theirs if they want to stay.
So the strike drags on for one and allWe'll go down in history they tell us allWe would rather be remembered for the way we foughtTo show our grandchildren we wouldn't be boughtFor we heard last night on TelevisionAll about the big incision!How many pits are going to be leftAlong our coastline to the right and leftOnly fifteen years and there will be only fiveIt's not very long so how can we surviveSo the strike goes on and on and onIt's what our livelihood depends uponHowever much it hurts we must keep goingTill everything's settled and we get what's owing.
Audrey Sillito(The Last Coals of Spring: 51)
35 "Here we go" was the women's hymn derived from a football song.
APPENDIX 83Women
We, as women, wanted to helpWe, as women, helped
We, as women, wanted to MarchWe, as women, marched
We, as women, wanted to tellWe, as women, told
We, as women, wanted equalityWe, as women, equalled
We, as women, wanted directionWe, as women, directed
Anne Suddick (R.Forbes / D.Smithson)
APPENDIX 84
6.4 Titlepage of 'Coalfield Woman'
APPENDIX 85
.v.6.5 Map of England with the North East coalfield
APPENDIX 86
.v.6.6 Map of the North East coalfield
APPENDIX 87
.v.6.7 Translations
H.Dirkes / S.Engert: 19
"The new 'phenomenon' has to be put down in the history of this
miners' strike in an oustanding position. Without the women it
couldn't have lasted so long."
H.Dirkes / S.Engert: 24
"Women who had hardly ever been beyond the boundaries of their
villages travelled all over the country [...] and spoke in front of mass
meetings - abroad as well."
H.Dirkes / S.Engert: 21
"We had our own committees then [1974] as well. Soup kitchens are
a tradition. But we didn't know what else to do. Therefore the
committees didn't have any prospects for the time after the strike
and so we broke up."
H.Dirkes / S.Engert: 25
"We will not return to what we did before and just stay at home and
look after the children [...]. We will do different things and learn
different things." (Betty Heathfield)
BIBLIOGRAPHY 88
7. Bibliography
Adeney,Martin / Lloyd,John (1986)The Miners' Strike 1984-5Loss without limitLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Allen,Victor L. (1981)The Militancy of British MinersShipley: The Moor Press
Andrews,ElizabethA Woman's Work is Never DoneYstrad Rhondda: The Cymric Democrat Publishing Society
Armstrong,Keith / Wilson,David F. (1985)Save Easington! Easington Colliery Past and Presentin the words of local people, young and oldEasington: East Durham Community Arts
Armstrong,Keith / Wilson,Susan (eds.) (1984)Miners' WivesPeterlee: East Durham Community Arts
Atkinson,Frank (1977)Life & Tradition in Northumberland and DurhamLondon: J.M.Dent & Sons Ltd.
Atkinson,G.L. (1980)A New Look at the Collieries in Northumberland and DurhamGateshead: National Coal Board
Barker,Diana Leonard / Allen,Sheila (eds.) (1976)Sexual Divisions and Society: Process and ChangeLondon: Tavistock Publications
Beaton,Lynn (1985)Shifting HorizonsLondon: Canary Press
Benson,John (1980)British Coalminers in the Nineteenth CenturyA Social HistoryNew York: Holmes & Meier Publishers
Beynon,Huw (ed.) (1985)Digging DeeperIssues in the miners' strikeLondon: Verso
BIBLIOGRAPHY 89Beynon,Huw (1984)
The Miners' Strike in Easingtonin: New Left Review
no.148, Nov./Dec. 1984 pp.104/115
Blood Sweat & Tears (1985)Photographs from the Great Miners Strike 1984/1985London: Artworker Books
Boston,Sarah (1980)Trade Union and the Woman WorkerLondon
Britten,Hilary (1985)Looking back - and forward on the miners' strikein: Spare Rib
no.153, April 1985 pp.9-10
Bulmer,Martin (1972 ??)IntroductionPersonal documents as sociological datain: Chaplin,Sid (1972 ??)
Durham Mining VillagesUniversity of Durham pp.i-x
Bulmer,Martin (ed.) (1978 a)Mining And Social ChangeDurham County in the Twentieth CenturyLondon: Croom Helm
Bulmer,Martin (1978 b)Politics in County DurhamIntroductionin: Bulmer,Martin (ed.) (1978 a)
Mining And Social ChangeLondon: Croom Helm pp.91-94
Bulmer,Martin (1978 c)Social Structure And Social Change in the Twentieth Centuryin: Bulmer,Martin (ed.) (1978 a)
Mining And Social ChangeLondon: Croom Helm pp.15-48
Bulmer,M.I.A. (1975)Sociological Models of the Mining Communityin: Sociological Review
23/1 February 1975 pp.61-92
Callcott,Maureen (1985)1926 - Women support the Minersin: North East Labour History
BIBLIOGRAPHY 90Bulletin of the North East Labour History SocietyNo.19, 1985 pp.40-42
Callinicos,Alex / Simons,Mike (1985)The Great StrikeThe miners' strike of 1984-5 and its lessonsLondon: Socialist Worker
Campbell,Beatrix (1986)Proletarian Patriarchs and the Real Radicalsin: Seddon,Vicky (ed.) (1986)
The Cutting EdgeLondon: Lawrence & Wishart pp.249-282
Campbell,Beatrix (1984 b)Wigan Pier RevisitedPoverty and Politics in the EightiesLondon: Virago Press
Chaplin,Sid (1972 ??)Durham Mining VillagesWorking Papers in Sociology No.3Durham: University of Durham, Department of Sociology and Social Administration
Chaplin,Sid (1978)Durham Mining Villagesin: Bulmer,Martin (ed.) (1978 a)
Mining And Social ChangeLondon: Croom Helm pp.59-82
Clark,Alice (1980)The Working Life of Women in the 17th Centuryin: Boston,Sarah (1980)
Trade Union and the Woman WorkerLondon
Clarney,Peter (1984)Mineworkers' StrikeThe personal diary of: Peter Clarneyin: New Socialist
no.19, Sept.1984 p.27
Coalfield Woman (1987)Women Against Pit Closures NewsletterSheffieldNo.5, January 1987
Coombes,B.L. (1939)These Poor HandsThe autobiography of a miner working in South Wales
BIBLIOGRAPHY 91London
Coulter,Jim / Miller,Susan / Walker,Martin (1984)State of SiegePolitics and policing of the coalfields: Miners' Strike 1984London: Canary Press
Crook,Rosemary (1982)`Tidy Women': Women in the Rhondda between the warsin: Oral History Journal
Vol.10, No.2, Autumn 1982 pp.40-46
Dirkes,Hermann / Engert,Steffi (Hrsg.) (1985)Britische Kumpel und ihre Frauen im KampfBergarbeiterstreik 1984/85Frankfurt am Main: Internationale sozialistische Publikationen
Dixon,Mrs. (1984)"No doubt she was a slave"in: Armstrong,K. / Wilson,S. (eds.) (1984)
Miners' WivesPeterlee: EDCA p.5
Douglass,Dave (1975)Pit talk in county Durhamin: Samuel,R. (ed.) (1975)
Miners, Quarrymen and SaltworkersLondon, Boston & Henley: RKP pp.299-348
Douglass,Dave (1981)`Worms of the Earth': The miners' own storyin: Samuel,R. (ed.) (1981)
People's History and Socialist TheoryLondon, Boston, Henley: RKP pp.61-67
Douglass,Maureen (1984)Mining For Changein: Spare Rib
No.144, July 1984 p.11
Drechsler,Hanno / Hilligen,Wolfgang / Neumann,Franz (1979)Gesellschaft und StaatLexikon der PolitikBaden-Baden: Signal Verlag
The Durham MinerJoint Newspaper of Durham Miners & MechanicsNovember 1986
Durland,Kellogg (1904)Among the Fife Miners
BIBLIOGRAPHY 92London
Fine,Bob / Millar,Robert (eds.) (1985)Policing the Miners' StrikeLondon: Lawrence & Wishart
Fish,Lydia M. (1977)The Folklore of the Coal Miners of the Northeast of EnglandVolume IVolume IINorwood,Pa.: Norwood Editions
Forbes,Ross / Smithson,D. (eds.) (1985)Feelings Alive '84/85Poems of the Miners Strike in DurhamHetton-le-Hole: Eppleton Miners' Wives Support Group
Fothergill,Stephen / Gudgin,Graham (1985)Job Prospects in the CoalfieldsCambridge
Frow,R. / Frow,E. / Katanka,Michael (1971)StrikesA documentary historyLondon: Charles Knight
Gee,Mrs. (1984)"Female labour"in: Armstrong,K. / Wilson,S. (eds.) (1984)
Miners' WivesPeterlee: EDCA p.13
The Girls From S.E.A.M.An East Durham Community Arts "People's Broadsheet" (No.2)Peterlee: EDCA, December 1984
Glyn,Andrew (1984)The Economic Case Against Pit ClosuresSheffield: National Union of Mineworkers
Goodman,Geoffrey (1985)The Miners' StrikeLondon and Sydney: Pluto Press
Graham,Sheila For the ChildrenA personal account of how the Brenkley Miners' Wives Support Group was formed, their experiences and achievements during the Miners' Strike, 1984-1985
Graveson,Margaret
BIBLIOGRAPHY 93Miners' Wives 1984/85 - Short Biography(in possession of B.Frost, Oldenburg)
Grayson,John (1984)Sexism struggle down the pitin: New Socialist
no.21, Nov,1984 p.4
Green,Andrew (1985)Research Bibliography of Published Materials Relating to the Coal Dispute 1984-85in: Scraton,P. / Thomas,P. (eds.) (1985)
The State v. The PeopleOxford: Basil Blackwell
Hall,Tony (1981)King CoalMiners, Coal and Britains's Industrial FutureHarmondsworth: Penguin Books
Hanlon,Mrs. (1984)"Home with your family"in: Armstrong,K. / Wilson,S. (eds.) (1984)
Miners' WivesPeterlee: EDCA pp.14-15
Head,Joanna (1984)From the heartin: New Statesman
15 June 1984 p.13
Heroes (1985)Lp(P) 1985 Rock 'n' Dole Records(C) 1985 Northumberland and Durham Miners' Support Groupproduced by Consett Music Projects, Consett, Co.Durham
Heron,Patricia DiaryP.Heron, 10 Hawthorn St., Houghton-le-Spring,Tyne & Wear, Great Britain
Hodges,A. `I remember'Durham Record Office
Holderness,Margaret (1983)The Changing Role of Women in South Yorkshire 1960-1980Barnsley: M.Holderness
Jackson,Stevie (1984)
BIBLIOGRAPHY 94Behind Men? Not Quite!in: Spare Rib
no.146, Sept.1984 p.9
Jedrzejczyk,Izabela / et.al. (1986)Striking WomenCommunities & CoalPhotographs by Izabela Jedrzejczyk, Raissa Page, Brenda Prince, Imogen YoungLondon, Sydney, Dover (New Hampshire): Pluto Press
John,Angela V. (1980)By the Sweat of Their BrowWomen Workers at Victorian Coal MinesLondon: Croom Helm
John,Angela V. (1984)Coalmining WomenVictorian Lives and CampaignsCambridge, London, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney: Cambridge University Press
John,Angela V. (1976)The Lancashire Pit Brow Lasses and the campaign to remove women from surface labourin: Bulletin of the North West Group for the
Study of Labour History Vol.3, 1976 pp.1-5
John,Angela V. (1986)Postscriptin: Jedrzejczyk,I. (1986)
Striking WomenLondon, etc.: Pluto Press pp.89-94
John,Angela V. (1982)Scratching the Surface.Women, Work And Coalmining in England and Walesin: Oral History Journal
Vol.10, No.2, Autumn 1982 pp.13-26
Kerr,Clark / Siegel,Abraham (1977)The Interindustry Propensity to Strike - An International Comparisonin: Kornhauser,A. / et.al. (1977)
Industrial ConflictNew York: Arno Press pp.189-212
Kettle,Martin (1985)1926 and NOW: if the miners lose againin: New Socialist
no.24, Febr.1985 pp.24-27
BIBLIOGRAPHY 95Kornhauser,Arthur / Dubin,Robert / Ross,Arthur M. (eds.) (1977)
Industrial ConflictNew York: Arno Press (New York Times Co.)[Reprint of the edition published in 1954 by McGraw-Hill]
Lambeth Women's Miners Support Group (1985)Striking new connectionsin: Spare Rib
no.153, April 1985 pp.32-33
Land,Hilary (1976)Women: Supporters or Supported?in: Barker,D.L. / Allen,S. (eds.) (1976)
Sexual Divisions and Society: Process and ChangeLondon: Tavistock pp.108-132
The Last Coals of Spring (1985)Poems, Stories & Songs by the Women of Easington CollieryPeterlee: Durham Voices
Leifchild,J.R. (1968)Our Coal and Our PitsLondon: Frank Cass and Co.
LINKS (1987)LINKS - A Philosophy for ActionPamphlet for the LINKS conference on 14 February 1987 in Durham(sub-edited version)
LINKS Campaign (1986)After ChernobylHow Safe Is "Safe"?Originally written by Janice Owen of ALARM(Alert Londoners Against the Radiation Menace)
Llewelyn Davies,M. (ed.) (1975)Life As We Have Known ItNew York: Hogarth Press
Lloyd,John (1985)Understanding The Miners' StrikeFabian Society Tract No.504London: Fabian Society
Loach,Loretta (1984)We'll Be Here Right To The End. And After.in: Spare Rib
no.147, Oct.1984 pp.6-8,26
Loach,Loretta (1985)We'll Be Here Right To The End...And After
BIBLIOGRAPHY 96Women in the Miners' Strikein: Beynon,H. (ed.) (1985)
Digging DeeperLondon: Verso pp.169-179
MacGregor,Ian (with Rodney Tyler) (1987)The Enemies WithinThe Story of the Miners' Strike, 1984-5Glasgow: Fontana Paperbacks
Mackay,KathWomen Against Pit ClosuresFrom Local Group to National Organisation
Massey,Doreen / Wainwright,Hilary (1985 a)Beyond the CoalfieldsThe Work of the Miners' Support Groupsin: Beynon,H. (ed.) (1985)
Digging DeeperLondon: Verso pp.149-168
Massey,Doreen / Wainwright,Hilary (1985 b)Keep Moving On...in: New Socialist
no.26, April 1985 pp.8-9
McGarry,Doris Letter to W.S.Howard(in possession of W.S.Howard, Sunderland Polytechnic)
Metcalf,Mark `What happened to you in the strike, Mum?'The Women of the S.E.A.M. (Save Easington Area Mines)Relief Cafes (Script)
Miller,Susan (1985)"The best thing that ever happened to us":Women's Role in the Coal Disputein: Scraton,P. / Thomas,P. (eds.) (1985)
The State V. The PeopleOxford: Basil Blackwell pp.355-364
Morgan,Kenneth O. (1985)A Time For Miners To Forget Historyin: New Society
21 February 1985 pp.283-285
Morton,A.L. (1979)A People's History of EnglandLondon: Lawrence & Wishart
BIBLIOGRAPHY 97The National Coal Board
facts and figuresBritain's Coal IndustryLondon: NCB (probably 1984)
National Minority MovementStrike Strategy and Tactics(The Lessons of the Industrial Struggles)1932in: Frow,R. / et.al. (1971)
StrikesLondon: Charles Knight pp.195-222
Newton,Gwen (ed.)We Are Women, We Are StrongThe Stories of Northumberland Miner's WivesCollected by Gwen Newton
Nichols,Mrs. (1984)"Just the way it was"in: Armstrong,K. / Wilson,S. (eds.) (1984)
Miners' WivesPeterlee: EDCA p.9
North East Trade Union Studies Information Unit (N.E.T.U.S.I.U.) (1985)The Case For CoalThe Future of the Durham and Northumberland CoalfieldA pamphlet prepared by the North East Trade Union Studies Information Unit on behalf of Tyne and Wear County Council and Durham County Council
Orwell,George (1986)The Road to Wigan PierHarmondsworth: Penguin Books
Ottey,Roy (1985)The StrikeAn Insider's StoryLondon: Sidgwick & Jackson
Page Arnot,Robin (1950)The MinersYears of Struggle
Park,Robert E. (1950)Race and CultureGlencoe
Parker,Tony (1986)Red HillA Mining Community
BIBLIOGRAPHY 98London, Melbourne, Johannesburg, Auckland: William Heinemann
Parkinson,George (1912)True Stories of Durham Pit-LifeLondon
Phillips,Marion (1927)Women And The Miners' Lock-OutThe Story of the Women's Commitee for the Relief of the Miners' Wives and ChildrenLondon: The Labour Publishing Company
Pine,MargaretNot By Bread AlonePlay by the women of "Save Easington Area Mines"Sample Scenes, first draft
Pit Head Baths (1975)(from a Mid-Lancashire Guildswoman)in: Llewelyn Davies,M. (ed.) (1975)
Life As We Have Known ItNew York: Hogarth Press pp.136-140
Pitt,Malcolm (1979)The World On Our BacksThe Kent Miners and the 1972 Miners' StrikeLondon: Lawrence & Wishart
Pollard,Michael (1984)The Hardest Work Under HeavenThe life and death of the British coal minerLondon, Melbourne, Sydney, Auckland, Johannesburg: Hutchinson
The Red Miner (1985 a)Bulletin for miners and their familiesNo.1, April 1985London: Workers Power
Reed,David / Adamson,Olivia (1985)Miners Strike 1984-1985: People versus State London: Larkin Publications
Rose,Hilary (1984)The Miners' Wives of Uptonin: New Society
29 November 1984 pp.326-329
Rowbotham,Sheila (1974)Hidden From History300 Years of Women's Oppression and the Fight Against ItLondon: Pluto Press
BIBLIOGRAPHY 99Ruddell,Lorna
(a short biography)(in possession of B.Frost, Oldenburg)
Samuel,Raphael (ed.) (1975)Miners, Quarrymen and SaltworkersHistory Workshop SeriesLondon, Boston & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Samuel,Raphael (ed.) (1981)People's History and Socialist TheoryHistory Workshop SeriesLondon, Boston & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Samuel,Raphael / Bloomfield,Barbara / Boanas,Guy (eds.) (1986)The Enemy WithinPit villages and the miners' strike of 1984-5History Workshop SeriesLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Samuel,Raphael (1986 b)Introductionin: Samuel,R. / et.al. (eds.) (1986)
The Enemy WithinLondon: RKP pp.1-39
Scraton,Phil / Thomas,Phil (1985)The State V.The PeopleLessons from the Coal DisputeOxford: Basil Blackwellor:Journal of Law and SocietyVolume 12, No.3, Winter 1985Basil Blackwell
Seddon,Vicky (ed.) (1986 a)The Cutting EdgeWomen and the Pit StrikeLondon: Lawrence & Wishart
Seddon,Vicky (1986 b)Introductionin: Seddon,V. (ed.) (1986 a)
The Cutting EdgeLondon: Lawrence & Wishart pp.11-15
Smith,F.H. (1975)In A Mining VillageIn: Llewelyn Davies,M. (ed.) (1975)
Life As We Have Known ItNew York: Hogarth Press pp.67-72
BIBLIOGRAPHY 100Solidarity With The Miners (1985)
London: Labour Research Department
Stead,Jean (1987)Never The Same AgainWomen and the miners' strike 1984-85London: Women's Press
Stearns,Peter N. (1972)Working-Class Women in Britain, 1890-1914in: Vincinus,M. (ed.) (1972)
Suffer And Be StillBloomington, London: Indiana UP pp.100-120
Sutcliffe,Lesly / Hill,Brian (1985)Let Them Eat CoalThe Political Use of Social Security During the Miners' StrikeLondon: Canary Press
Taylor,C.C. / Townsend,A.R. (1976)The Local "Sense of Place" as evidenced in the North-East of Englandin: Urban Studies
13, 1976
Taylor,Sandra (1986)Grub Up for the Miners!Women's Contradictory Role in the 1984-85 Miners' Strikein: Seddon,V. (ed.) (1986)
The Cutting EdgeLondon: Lawrence & Wishart pp.76-96
Thomas,David (1984)The secret war against coalin: New Socialist
no.19, Sept.1984 pp.31-32
Vincinus,Martha (ed.) (1972)Suffer And Be StillWomen in the Victorian AgeBloomington, London: Indiana University Press
Walker,Martin (1985)A Turn of the ScrewThe aftermath of the 1984-85 Miners' strikeLondon: Canary Press
WCCPL & NUM (South Wales) (1985)Striking BackLlandybie: WCCPL & NUM (South Wales Area)
Which Side Are You On
BIBLIOGRAPHY 101Music for the miners made in supportof the Miners Strike 1984-85(c)(p) Which Side Records 1985WSR 1
Whitehall,Mrs. (1984)"Never bothered with politics"in: Armstrong,K. / Wilson,S. (eds.) (1984)
Miners' WivesPeterlee: EDCA pp.11-12
Williams,Raymond (1985)Mining the MeaningKey words in the miners' strikein: New Socialist
no.25, 1985 pp.6-9
Wilsher,Peter / Macintyre,Donald / Jones,Michael (eds.) (1985)StrikeThatcher, Scargill and the MinersLondon: Andre Deutsch
Wilson,David F. (ed.) (1986)South HettonThe eight rows and other stories. A unique chronicleEasington: East Durham Community Arts
Witham,Joan (1986)Hearts and MindsThe story of the women of Nottinghamshire in the Miners' Strike, 1984-1985London: Canary Press
Women fight for pits (1984)in: Community Action
No.68, Dec.1984 pp.22-30
Women's Links (1987)"Women's International Day For Disarmament"pamphletManchester
Wood,Heather (1987)Interview with Heather Wood, chairperson of the Easington Women's Support Group4 February 1987(in possession of G.Schoone, Oldenburg)
Workers PowerWomen's Oppression, Women's Liberation and SocialismWhy we need a working class women's movement
BIBLIOGRAPHY 102London: Workers Power
Content
Glossary 1
1. Introduction 4
2. The Evolution of Women's Roles in the Coalfields 62.1 Introduction 62.2 Coal-mining and the pit-village 6
2.2.1. Mining - male or female ? 62.2.2 The pit-village 9
2.2.2.1 Physical Isolation 92.2.2.2 Economic predominance of mining 112.2.2.3 The nature of work 122.2.2.4 The leisure activities 152.2.2.5 The family 16
2.2.3 Conclusions 182.3 Women's roles in mining-communities before 1984/85 19
2.3.1 Introduction 192.3.2 Excluding women 192.3.3 Jobs for women 202.3.4 Women and leisure 202.3.5 The union and the women 212.3.6 Masculinity and muscularity 212.3.7 Family 232.3.8 Identity 252.3.9 And today... 26
3. Women in industrial disputes of the coal industry before 1984/85 29
3.1 Introduction 293.2 The Miners' Lock-Out of 1926 303.3 Women's fight for pit-head baths 31
4. The 1984/85 Miners' Strike and women's roles 334.1 Introduction 334.2 The background to the Miners' Strike 1984/85 33
4.2.1 The run-down of the industry1947-1984 33
4.2.2 The state prepares 374.2.3 A short chronology of the strike 384.2.4 What was the Miners' Strike about? 42
4.2.4.1 Jobs 434.2.4.2 The community 43
4.3 Women's activities in the Miners' Strike 1985/85 444.3.1 The origins of women's participation 454.3.2 Women's activities and what they meant for
them 47
4.3.2.1 The soup kitchens 474.3.2.2 Picketing 504.3.2.3 Fund-raising and public speaking 524.3.2.4 Strength from Greenham 544.3.2.5 Writing 554.3.2.6 Other activities 574.3.2.7 Concluding remarks 58
4.3.3 A re-run of the past ? 594.4 Women's roles during and after the
Miners' Strike 1984/85 604.4.1 What the men thought... 624.4.2 Women's words and women's roles 67
4.4.2.1 Topics. orWhat they had to say 68
4.4.3 Was it all over - when it was over ? 734.4.4 The future - Back into oblivion ? 76
5. Conclusions 79
6. Appendix 816.1 Diary of Mrs.Patricia Heron 816.2 Letter from Mrs McG. to W.S.Howard 846.3 Final chapter of 'For the Children' 866.3 Poems 886.4 Titlepage of 'Coalfield Woman' 916.5 Map of England with the North East coalfield 926.6 Map of the North East coalfield 936.7 Translations 94
7. Bibliography 95