Click here to load reader
Upload
baoilleach
View
439
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
COST D19 International Workshop on Nanochemistry, Sept 26-28 2002, Vienna, Austria
Citation preview
The National Centre for Sensor Research
Figure 2
ResultsThe emission spectrum and absorption spectra (both steady-state and
transient) of [Ru(bpy)2(dcb)2-] are shown in Figure 3 while the emission
lifetimes obtained for the partially deuteriated complexes are shown in the
Table A. Deuteriation reduces the rate of non-radiative deactivation of the
excited state. This leads to increased emission lifetimes provided the
excited state is based on the deuteriated ligand.
Figure 3
Excited-state resonance Raman measurements (Figure 4) clearly show
that the excited state is localised on the dcb2-. Resonances due to the
dcb3–• anion radical are observed at 1312 and 1212 cm-1.
Figure 4
IntroductionRuthenium polypyridyl complexes have been widely used as covalently
bound dyes in solar energy devices based on nanocrystalline TiO2. In
addition it has been shown that nanocrystalline TiO2 surfaces modified
with dinuclear RuOs polypyridyl complexes respond in a uniform
manner to irradiation as shown below in Figure 1.
Figure 1
In most cases the molecular components have been covalently attached
via 4,4’-dicarboxy-2,2’-bipyridine (H2dcb) type ligands. It is generally
assumed that in these assemblies injection into the TiO2 surface is
enhanced by the fact that the excited state is based on the dcb2- ligand.
This assumption is tested here for the model compound
[Ru(bpy)2(dcb)2-] (see Figure 2) by the use of deuteriation in
combination with emission lifetime measurements and resonance
Raman spectroscopy.
Deuteriation
Scheme 1
Table A
Towards Practical Molecular Devices:
the Incorporation of a Solid Substrate as an
Active Component in Molecular Assemblies
Noel M. O’Boyle,a Wesley R. Browne,a Steve Welter,b Ron T.F. Jukes,b Luisa De Cola,b Colin G. Coates,c
John J. McGarvey,c Johannes G. Vosa
a National Centre for Sensor Research, School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Irelandb Molecular Photonics Group, IMC, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
c Queens University Belfast, School of Chemistry, Belfast BT9 5AG, Northern Ireland
ConclusionsBoth the variation in emission lifetime as well as the rR spectra observed confirm that the excited state in bpy/dcb2- complexes is dcb2- based. The
results clearly indicate that deuteriation is a powerful method for the study of the nature of the excited state in complexes of ruthenium.
AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by Enterprise Ireland and COST D19.
Ru
N
NN
N
N N
COOHHOOC
N N N N
CD3
D
D
D D
D
D
D3C
D2O
N N
D
D
D D
D
D
HOOC COOH
[O]
NaOD
(ns)
Ru(bpy)2(dcb2-) 562
Ru(bpy)2(d6-dcb2-) 633
Ru(d8-bpy)2(dcb2-) 573
Ru(d8-bpy)2(d6-dcb2-) 679
e-
e-
e-
Ru Os Ru Os
400 500 600 700 800
0.0
0.2
0.4
Ru(bpy)3
2+
Ru(bpy)2(dcb)
Ab
so
rba
nce
Wavelength (nm)
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
Co
un
ts p
er s
eco
nd
1600 1500 1400 1300 1200
dcb*3-
dcb*3-
dcb*3-bpy
16
04
cm
-1
14
50
cm
-1
14
91
cm
-1
12
12
cm
-1
bpy
13
12
cm
-1
Wavenumber in cm-1
[Ru([H8]-bpy)
2([H
6]-dcb
2-)]
[Ru([H8]-bpy)
2([D
6]-dcb
2-)]
[Ru([D8]-bpy)
2([H
6]-dcb
2-)]
[Ru([D8]-bpy)
2([D
6]-dcb
2-)]
Ru(bpy)2(H2dcb)
d6-H2dcb