Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Towards sustainable food systems in the humid and temperate regions of Africa: insights from Nigeria,
Malawi and South Africa
by
A. Obi
and
E.O.C. Ijeoma
Outline• Introduction
• Explaining sustainable food systems
• Defining food security
• The Gap
• Tackling the problem
• Productivity issues and inequality
• Market Access issues
• Success stories and priority value chains
• Issues and responses
• Mechanism for effective change agenda – the innovation platform
• A sustainable food system is a collaborative network that integrates several components in order to enhance a community’s environmental, economic and social well-being.
• It is built on principles that further the ecological, social and economic values of a community and region.
• Characteristics of a sustainable food system are outlined below (based on Pothukuchi and Jufman, 1999):
Food Systems
• Food systems encompass all the people, institutions and processes by which agricultural products are produced, processed and brought to consumers.
• They also include the public officials, civil society organizations, researchers and development practitioners who design the policies, regulations, programmes and projects that shape food and agriculture.
• The industrial food systems started with the factory system of fast food which changed how food was produced.
• The food system is complex and involved many steps.
6
• When food security issues were first highlighted in the seventies, thequestion was whether a nation or a region could command enoughfood to meet the aggregate requirements of its people.
• Special attention was paid to fluctuations in aggregate food supply,and food security interventions were primarily concerned withproviding effective buffer mechanisms against such fluctuations.
• In this context, food security measures came to be identified withmacro-level instruments such as national and international storage offood and balance-of-payments support for countries facing temporaryfood shortages (see Valdes 1981).
7
•It was soon realized, however, that this gave a very limited view ofthe food security problem.
•A large segment of a population could be living in hunger even if thecountry had sufficient food in the aggregate during normal times.
•Likewise, a sizeable section of the population could plunge intohunger during moments of crisis, even if the nation had an adequate‘cushion’ to maintain aggregate food availability.
•Adequacy at the aggregate level does not necessarily ensureadequacy at the household or individual level.
8
•This point seems obvious enough, but it took some time to redirect the discussions on food security away from the macro level towards the household, and still further towards the individual.
•While the focus on the disaggregated has now become common, the various definitions of food security still differ.
•The following definition offered by a special committee of the United Nations seems reasonably comprehensive:
•"A household is food secure when it has access to the food needed for a healthy life for all its members (adequate in terms of quality, quantity and culturally acceptable), and when it is not at undue risk of losing such access"
Food Security
A formal definition
Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life (Committee on World Food Security, 2009).
Food Security as seen by IDAM Cohort 2
• Food security – is access to adequate nutritious food at all times.
• Food security consists of 4 dimensions:
Availability-Sufficient
Access- Physical, economical and social
Utilization- safe and nutritional
Stability- all the time
Tackling the problem
• “Governments could pursue two kinds of policy action: • they could either change the behaviour of farmers, consumers, food processors, and other
economic agents in the system through incentives, regulations, and knowledge; • or they could accept present behaviours and introduce health-specific and nutrition-specific
interventions to compensate for any nutritional damage done or improvements forgone.
• Although changing of behaviour is likely to be more cost-effective and sustainable, the second option is the most common.”
• The priority...is too heavily focused on increasing production.
• While food production needs to increase, there are many problems with this short-sighted supply-side approach.
• It encourages the expansion of industrial agriculture rather than more sustainable and affordable methods. It treats current demand trends, e.g. biofuels, meat-based diets, post-production food waste, etc., as given rather than challenging the policies that encourage them.
• Also unchallenged are the inequities in the distribution of the food we produce, which is more than enough to feed everyone.”
Tackling the problem
• Food system interventions for better nutrition
• Keeping up the momentum of growth in agricultural productivity will be key to meeting demand.
• Production interventions that are gender sensitive and combined with nutrition education are more effective.
• Agricultural research and development priorities need to have a greater emphasis on nutrient-dense foods such as vegetables and fruits.
Source: FAO “The State of Food and Agriculture 2013
A look at the gap…
State of Africa Agriculture [a decade ago...]
Some Statistics <5% suitable agricultural
land in production
Only 4% land in production is irrigated (30% in S Asia)
Low fertilizer use/high depletion of soil nutrients
Agricultural productivity was 25% of global average
Only 1% of commercial lending in Africa goes to agriculture
• Agricultural productivity was low, reflecting the failure to find, adopt and use more productive technologies
• Poor market linkages.
• Inadequate infrastructure and poor land tenure arrangements
State of Africa agriculture [a decade ago…]
Weak private sector
Underinvestment in research; leading to ineffective R&D models; weak and unaccountable institutions
Inappropriate policies
External influences [globalization etc.]
The Root Problem…
Failure to convert research outcomes into socio-economic benefits/real impact/development outcomes
NRM
Productivity
Market
Policy
Little wonder that on Dec 6th 2007…
How did we get here?Population growth Unstructured intervention
Actual investment
RequiredInvestment
Farming Behaviorgap
Technological and Institutional Barriers
Often untamed Institutional issues will prevent socio-economic benefits from the best-bet
technologies
Common institutional barriers
• Land tenure
• Access to credit
• Access to information
• Availability of seeds
• Access to inputs
• Availability of fertilizer
• Market access
• Trade policies
• Product regulations
• infrastructure etc.
Problem tree analysis
Most interventions
target the effects and
not the cause of the
problem
24
In the face of the disappearing supplies andmarkets, it was not surprising that manycountries experienced hyper-inflationarytrends at scales that had never been seenanywhere else
.
Gini coefficients and Lorenz Curve
27
Farm workers strike in South Africa in 2014
28
Market access issues
…but it is not a laughing matter
W.O. Jones (1960) presents David Livingstone’s description of a typical market scene: “theMarket is a busy scene; everyone is in dead earnest; little time is lost in friendly greetings;Vendors of fish run about potsherds full of snails or small fishes…”
Tomato Production and Marketing in the Kano-Katsina-Maradi Vegetable Innovation Platform
What would make the buyers go here instead of Fruit & Veg Town?
Road side vending & Hawking in South Africa
Table: Assessment of sub-regional socio-economic differences, 1988-1998
Indicators Southern Africa
Western Africa
Eastern Africa
Central Africa
Human resource availability ** ** * *
Infrastructure ** * * -
Policy framework ** ** **
Existence of civil society organisations
* (a) ** *** -
Sufficient entrepreneurial skills *** **** *
Availability of organised markets *** ** *
Modest agricultural finance * *
Existence of good natural endowments
** *** ** -
Dual requirements for agricultural growth: Results of a survey of pockets of sustained agricultural growth in Africa
Increased
productivity: on farm
and post-farm
Market
incentives+
Source: Haggblade 2016
Some Success stories - Setting Targets for 15 Priority Value ChainsCommodity supply demand demand improved target input total
2015 2015 2025 yield area cost investment
---------------- x 1000 t --------------- t/ha x 1000 ha $/ha $ x million
rice 17,477 26,047 34,925 4.5 7,761 500 3,881
cassava 137,765 137,937 167,873 24.0 6,995 252 1,763
sorghum 32,142 32,018 42,370 1.8 23,539 151 3,554
millet 21,323 20,877 27,179 1.6 16,987 151 2,565
cowpea 5,928 5,669 7,521 1.3 5,785 126 729
beef 7,332 7,545 11,138 na na na 2,198
maize 58,863 78,529 103,417 3.0 34,472 300 10,342
soybean 1,428 2,797 3,531 2.4 1,471 238 350
milk (dairy) 41,725 51,598 64,165 na na na 3,335
poultry 4,595 5,420 7,725 na na na 5,077
cacao 3,272 632 902 0.9 1,002 800 802
coffee 981 741 1,035 1.1 941 664 625
vegetables 44,500 48,491 68,691 35.0 1,963 1,240 2,434
wheat 23,707 24,645 32,419 4.4 7,368 191 1,407
fish 1,485 2,706 3,545 49.0 72 6,156 445
Aflasafe Development in Africa
Senegal
Burkina
FasoGhana
Nigeria
Kenya
Tanzania
Mozambique
Zambia
Rwanda
Malawi
Burundi
Uganda
The
Gambia
Strain development in
progress
Products under testing in
farmers’ fields
Product ready for registration
Product registered
Aflasafe
• The efficacy of Aflasafe to combat contamination of food crops by aflatoxins from the field up to storage has received further recognition from the Partnership for Aflatoxin Control in Africa (PACA), a flagship program on the African Union Commission
Award certificate – with (left-right) Alejandro, Victor, Abdou, and Lawrence.
Challenge to scale up Aflasafe
President making cassava bread a national policy
Promotion of Cassava bread by President Obasanjo -IITA Ambassador
IITA’s Cassava Bread supported by AfDB
Capacity Strengthening through
Training and enhanced access to improved
technology
Market Access
Improving access to inputs through
subsidization
Research and policy
priorities
Tra
de-o
ffs a
nd
syn
erg
ies
Improved environmental
benefit
Improved livelihoods of
farmers
Improved
food security priorities
Impacts
Adaptation of Lucy Holt’s framework
Dealing with Trade-Offs & Synergies
Sustainability implies consideration of health & wellbeing in “social dimension”
waste
Managing the “nexus”
Sustainability is about maintaining ecosystem services at a global and local scale appropriate to place, societal needs and ethical values
Institutions factor Implication/outcome Interventions needed
1. Policy Lack of operational policy and specific objectives
Balanced operational policy with realistic targets
2. Planning Lack of decentralized/participatory agricultural planning
Establish participatory agricultural planning systems and procedures
3. Rural infrastructure Poor water distribution, roads, communication, etc.
Planned piped water, schemes, roads, etc.
4. Inputs/services Lack of readily available inputs/services Establish rural service centers in various districts of the country
5. Marketing/prices Lack of organized marketing and price incentives
Marketing and pricing policy for major products
6. Credit Lack of credit facilities Provide selective controlled credit7. Research Lack of local agricultural research Develop suitable applied research structures.8. Extension Ineffective and inefficient extension Reorganize in-time bound Training and Visit
System. Then, balanced use of communication channels
9. Land tenure Lack of security and negotiability of land rights. Uncontrolled communal grazing
Registration and negotiability of arable land rights. Cooperative grazing schedules
10.Development coordination Uncoordinated rural development approach Decentralized control and coordination policy at District & regional level
11. Regulations and standards Lack of clarity; costly compliance requirements Farmer education programmes. Extension services providing support to producers.
12. Cooperation and collection action Absence of mechanisms for inter-household and inter-institutional cooperation
Civic education on value of cooperation and collective action; demonstration schemes
Issues and responses
A Cost-effective and Rapid Response – the innovation platform
• An Innovation Platform is a physical or virtual forum established to facilitate interactions, and learning among stakeholders selected from a commodity chain analysis.
• Their interaction leads to participatory diagnosis of problems; joint exploration of opportunities and investigation of solutions leading to the generation of agricultural innovation along the targeted commodity chain
48
Infrastructural Innovation
TechnologicalInnovation
InstitutionalInnovation
Output categories from Research Action
Innovation Platform
•Research Themes
Productivity
Market
Policy
Product
Development
Natural
Resource
management
Nutrition
•Gender
Socio-economic Benefits
49
Illustration of an Innovation platform
50
An Innovative Extension
System
1
Expanding
High-Value Markets
6
Develop Value Chains
5
Train Interested Farmers 4
Farmer-to Farmer Assess-ment
3
Organize Self-Help Groups
2
Identify Innovative
FarmersOn-farm
research on HVC/Ps (e.g.
KVKs)
Research on
HV Markets & Value Chains
Innovative extension system
Swanson (2011)
51
How to set up a functional Innovation platform
Innovation platform can be set up in different ways, but to be effective, it must have the following qualities;
• It must have cohesion
• Unite the stakeholders on the commodity where they have mutual interest.
• The platform must have potentials to meet the interest of stakeholders on board.
• All stakeholders must have a definite contribution to make and benefit to derive from the platform.
52
THANK YOU