Town of · PDF fileTown of Ajax Designated ... Final Project Name Doric Pickering Masonic Lodge 457 Kingston Road West, Ajax, Ontario Project Number BRM-00212250-B0

Town of Ajax

Designated Substances and Mould Survey Type of Document Final Project Name Doric Pickering Masonic Lodge 457 Kingston Road West, Ajax, Ontario Project Number BRM-00212250-B0 Prepared By:

exp Services Inc. 1595 Clark Boulevard Brampton, ON L6T 4V1 Canada Date Submitted December 2, 2014

TOWN OF AJAX

Designated Substances and Mould Survey

Type of Document:

Final

Project Name: DORIC PICKERING MASONIC LODGE 457 Kingston Road West, Ajax, Ontario

Project Number: BRM- 00212250-B0

Prepared By: exp Services Inc. 1595 Clark Blvd Brampton, ON L6T 4V1 Canada T: +1.905.793.9800 F: +1.905.793.0641 www.exp.com

_____________________________ Benjamin Samba Hazardous Materials Technologist Environmental Division

____________________________________ Manjinder Athwal, A.Sc.T. Team Leader / Senior Project Manager, Environmental Division

Date Submitted:

December 2, 2014

http://www.exp.com/

exp Services Inc.

Town of Ajax Designated Substances Survey – 457 Kingston Road West, Ajax, Ontario

BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

TOC i

Table of Contents

1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Regulatory Requirements .................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Scope of Work ..................................................................................................................... 2

1.4 Background Information on Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials ................. 2

1.4.1 Asbestos ............................................................................................................ 2

1.4.2 Lead ................................................................................................................... 2

1.4.3 Mercury .............................................................................................................. 3

1.4.4 Silica .................................................................................................................. 3

1.4.5 Vinyl Chloride ..................................................................................................... 4

1.4.6 Acrylonitrile ........................................................................................................ 4

1.4.7 Arsenic ............................................................................................................... 4

1.4.8 Benzene ............................................................................................................. 4

1.4.9 Coke Oven Emissions ....................................................................................... 4

1.4.10 Ethylene Oxide .................................................................................................. 5

1.4.11 Isocyanates ........................................................................................................ 5

1.4.12 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ..................................................................... 5

1.4.13 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) ................................................................. 5

1.4.14 Radioactive Materials ........................................................................................ 6

1.4.15 Mould ................................................................................................................. 7

2 Survey Methodology ......................................................................................................... 8

2.1 Asbestos .............................................................................................................................. 8

2.2 Lead ..................................................................................................................................... 9

2.3 Mercury ................................................................................................................................ 9

2.4 Silica .................................................................................................................................... 9

2.5 Other Designated Substances............................................................................................. 9

2.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ....................................................................................... 9

2.7 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) ................................................................................. 10

2.8 Radioactive Materials ........................................................................................................ 10

exp Services Inc.

Town of Ajax Designated Substances and Mould Survey – 457 Kingston Road West, Ajax, Ontario

BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

TOC ii

2.9 Mould ................................................................................................................................. 10

2.10 Survey Limitations ............................................................................................................. 11

3 Results and Findings ...................................................................................................... 12

3.1 Property Description .......................................................................................................... 12

3.2 Asbestos ............................................................................................................................ 12

3.2.1 Friable Asbestos .............................................................................................. 15

3.2.2 Non - Friable Asbestos .................................................................................... 15

3.2.3 Hazard Assessment of ACMs .......................................................................... 15

3.3 Lead ................................................................................................................................... 16

3.4 Mercury .............................................................................................................................. 17

3.5 Silica .................................................................................................................................. 17

3.6 Vinyl Chloride..................................................................................................................... 17

3.7 Acrylonitrile ........................................................................................................................ 17

3.8 Arsenic ............................................................................................................................... 17

3.9 Benzene ............................................................................................................................. 17

3.10 Coke Oven Emissions ....................................................................................................... 17

3.11 Ethylene Oxides ................................................................................................................ 17

3.12 Isocyanates........................................................................................................................ 17

3.13 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ..................................................................................... 17

3.13.1 Light Ballasts ................................................................................................... 18

3.13.2 Transformers ................................................................................................... 18



3.16 Mould ................................................................................................................................. 18

3.16.1 Visual Assessment .......................................................................................... 18

3.16.2 Tape Lift Sampling Results .............................................................................. 19

3.16.3 Air Sampling Results ....................................................................................... 19

4 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................ 21

4.1 Asbestos ............................................................................................................................ 21

4.1.1 Friable Asbestos .............................................................................................. 21

4.1.2 Non - Friable Asbestos .................................................................................... 21

4.2 Lead ................................................................................................................................... 22

4.3 Mercury .............................................................................................................................. 23

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

TOC iii

4.4 Silica .................................................................................................................................. 23

4.5 Other Designated Substances........................................................................................... 24

4.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ..................................................................................... 24



4.9 Mould ................................................................................................................................. 24

5 General Limitations ......................................................................................................... 26

List of Appendices

Appendix A – Laboratory Results

Appendix B – Identified Asbestos Location and Quantity Table

Appendix C – Photographs

Appendix D – Hazard Ranking and Decision Tree

Appendix E – Drawings

List of Tables Page

Table 2-1: O. Reg. 278/05 s. 3(3) - Minimum Asbestos Bulk Material Sample Requirements . 8

Table 3-1: Asbestos Sampling Locations and Laboratory Results ........................................ 12

Table 3-2: Lead Sampling Locations and Laboratory Results ................................................ 16

Table 3-3: Fluorescent Light Ballasts ........................................................................................ 18

Table 3-4: Summary of Tape Lift Sampling ................................................................................ 19

Table 3-5 – Summary of Air Sampling Results .......................................................................... 20

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

1

1 Introduction

Exp Services Inc. (exp) was retained by The Town of Ajax to carry out a Designated Substances Survey (DSS) of the building located at 457 Kingston Road West in Ajax, Ontario.

It is our understanding that the DSS was required to identify designated substances or other hazardous building materials which may be present in the building to ensure compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.

1.1 Regulatory Requirements

The Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.0.1, s.30 (1) requires:

“Before beginning a project, the owner shall determine whether any Designated Substances are present at the project Site and shall prepare a list of all Designated Substances that are present at the Site”.

Designated Substances are defined as any biological, chemical, or physical agent or combination thereof prescribed as a Designated Substance to which exposure of a worker is prohibited, regulated, restricted, limited or controlled.

Section 30 of the Act requires that the list of Designated Substances be provided to prospective contractors and subcontractors working on the Site.

The Ministry of Labor Designated Substances are the following:

Acrylonitrile Isocyanates

Arsenic Lead

Asbestos Mercury

Benzene Silica

Coke Oven Emissions Vinyl Chloride

Ethylene Oxide

In addition to the Designated Substances listed above, the building was also surveyed for the presence of other Hazardous Materials such as Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS), Radioactive Materials, and Mould.

This Designated Substance survey report complies with the requirements of the Occupational Health & Safety Act.

1.2 Purpose

The purpose of the survey was to:

1. Determine the presence or absence of Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials; and,

2. Establish the type, location, condition and approximate quantities of Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

2

1.3 Scope of Work

The Designated Substance survey entailed:

Visual review of accessible areas of the subject building to identify materials which could contain Designated Substances. This assessment did not involve intrusive investigations [i.e. assessment within walls or plastered/drywall (false ) ceilings was not conducted;

Bulk sampling and analysis of representative materials suspected of containing asbestos;

Assessment of the condition of the asbestos-containing materials (Hazard Assessment);

Bulk sampling and analysis of representative paints and finishes suspected of containing lead;

Visual assessment of the accessible areas of the building to identify suspect mould growth and/or water damaged building materials including obtaining moisture measurements;

Collection of tape lift samples for the identification of mould;

Collection of air samples for the identification of mould; and,

Recommendations for appropriate corrective action where required.

1.4 Background Information on Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials

1.4.1 Asbestos

Asbestos is a generic name that has been given to a group of naturally occurring fibrous minerals. In the past, asbestos was commonly used as a component in building materials such as insulation, fireproofing, and acoustic or decorative panels. Although there are many types of asbestos, the three main forms of commercial importance in Ontario are chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite.

An Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) is defined by the Ontario Regulation 278/05, the Regulation respecting Asbestos on Construction Projects in Buildings and Repair Operations – made under the Occupation Health and Safety Act (O. Reg. 278/05) as a material that contains 0.5 % or more asbestos by dry weight. ACMs are placed into two general classes, “friable” and “non-friable” ACMs. Friable ACMs are those materials that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized and reduced to powder by hand pressure. Typical friable ACMs include acoustical or decorative texture coats, fireproofing, some ceiling tiles, and thermal insulation. Non-friable ACMs are much more durable as they are held together by a binder such as cement, vinyl or asphalt. Typical non-friable ACMs include floor tiles, fire blankets, roofing materials and cementitious products such as wallboards, pipes or siding.

It has been recognized that hazardous situations may exist in buildings where asbestos-containing materials are found. This is especially true where asbestos fibers may become airborne as a result of material aging, physical damage, water damage or air movement. Diseases associated with the inhalation of asbestos fibres include asbestosis, mesothelioma and lung cancer. In contrast, there is little reason for concern if the asbestos is in good condition, has not been damaged, and is not in a location where it is likely to be disturbed.

1.4.2 Lead

Lead is a pale, silver-grey colored material when freshly cut, but darkens, when exposed to air. Lead may be used in its pure metallic form or combined chemically with other elements. Through various manufacturing processes, lead may be distributed through lead-containing dust, fumes, mists, liquids

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

3

and as vapors of liquid organic lead compounds. Industrial uses of lead include, smelting and refining, electroplating, and various chemical manufacturing processes.

Lead may be inhaled, ingested or absorbed thought the skin. Various body functions are affected by lead. Lead may interfere with the ability to manufacture hemoglobin in the blood. It reduces the kidneys ability to filter wastes from the blood stream. In the gastro-intestinal system, lead poisoning may result in abdominal pain, loss of appetite, vomiting, nausea, constipation and diarrhea. Lead may affect the nervous system, resulting in behavioral changes, impaired vision, hearing loss, brain disorders and peripheral nerve damage causing convulsions, coma, and death.

Heavy metals including primarily lead, cadmium, and mercury were added to paint for various desirable properties such as rust prevention or as a bactericide. When major building renovation or demolition operations are proposed, painted surfaces should be extensively sampled and analyzed to confirm if abatement precautions are required. Under no circumstances should heat be used to remove paint or cutting torches be applied to painted surfaces, as hazardous levels of metals may be released in the fumes.

There is no existing governmental regulation which defines what concentration of lead in paint is

required in order to consider the paint to be lead-based. There are guidelines (i.e. United States –

Environmental Protection Agency – Housing and Urban Development Guideline) that suggest that

paint is to be considered as lead-based if the lead concentration is equal to or greater than 5,000 ppm

(0.5% by weight).

The regulation Surface Coating Materials made under the Hazardous Products Act suggest that paint

is to be considered as containing lead if the lead concentration is equal to or greater than 90 mg/kg

(0.009% by dry weight).

In addition, there are no existing governmental regulations for the control of lead on construction

projects, however, a guideline addressing lead on construction projects has been issued by the

Ministry of Labor (September 2011).

1.4.3 Mercury

Mercury is a silver-colored heavy metal that is liquid at room temperature. It exists as a pure element and as inorganic mercury compounds. Metallic mercury is used in the following products and operations; batteries, electrical equipment, fluorescent light tubes, mercury vapor arc lamps, dental offices, chlorine products, and jewelry making. Mercuric compounds are found in the following industries: dye and ink manufacturing, explosives and fireworks manufacturing, paint manufacturing, paper manufacturing, photography processing, pesticide production and use, vinyl chloride production, and urethane foam production. Mercury is used in liquid form, but may also be present as a vapor. Mercury compounds may be found in liquid or solid form including dust particles. Mercury exposure may occur when it is inhaled, ingested or absorbed. Mercury poisoning can damage the nervous system, kidneys, skin, respiratory system, reproductive system and gastro-intestinal system.

1.4.4 Silica

Silica is found as a free crystalline or amorphous material. Free crystalline silica is not bound with a metal atom. It occurs naturally as quartz and in combination with clays, feldspars and other silicates. Quartz alone constitutes 30% of the earth’s crust. Silica is used in several different industries and products such as sandblasting, molds forecasting work, manufacture of abrasives, grinding compounds, paint fillers and mastic, glass, pottery, ceramics, electronic components, fiberglass, steel industries, and quarries.

The primary exposure pathway of silica is through inhalation. A lung disease, silicosis, occurs as a result of the scaring of lung tissue from exposure to the crystalline form of silica.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

4

1.4.5 Vinyl Chloride

Vinyl chloride is a member of a group of chemicals referred to as vinyl halides. It is a gas at standard room temperature and pressure. Vinyl chloride is used extensively in the chemical industry in the production of ethylene oxide as an extraction solvent. This material may be used in its vapor form or solubilized in a liquid.

Exposure may occur through inhalation, ingestion, dermal contact, or eye contact. Short-term exposure to vinyl chloride can cause dizziness, light-headaches, nausea, dullness of visual and auditory responses, drowsiness and loss of consciousness. Irritation of the skin and eyes can also occur. Skin contact with the liquid can cause frostbite. Long term exposure to vinyl chloride can cause thickening of the skin, contact and allergic dermatitis, fatigue, coughing and sneezing, abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, nausea, vomiting, indigestion, diarrhea, jaundice, weight loss, anorexia, and a cold tingling sensation of the hands and feet.

1.4.6 Acrylonitrile

Acrylonitrile is a translucent liquid that reacts with other chemicals to produce polymers such as resin. Acrylonitrile may also be found in the vapor (gaseous) state in the workplace. It is used in the production of nitrile rubbers, plastics, acrylic fibers, coatings, and adhesives. Industries that use these products include automotive parts, clothing, carpets, plastic and gasket manufacturing.

Workers may be exposed to acrylonitrile through inhaling its vapors and through ingestion. Skin contact can cause itching and rashes. Diseases associated with acrylonitrile exposure are cancer and acute acrylonitrile poisoning (which can be fatal). Symptoms of acute acrylonitrile poisoning include headaches, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting.

1.4.7 Arsenic

Arsenic is a heavy metal found in low concentrations in the earth’s crust. It may be used in elemental form or as a chemical compound. Principal uses of or exposure to arsenic in industry include, metal workers, refiners (principally associated with copper refining), petroleum refining and herbicides. Exposure is generally via inhalation. Chronic effects of exposure to arsenic and its compounds include lung cancer, blood disorders, heart failure, bronchitis, and laryngitis. Acute effects include pulmonary neoplasms or bronchitis.

1.4.8 Benzene

Benzene is a very flammable and volatile aromatic organic hydrocarbon. Although usually used in liquid form, it may also be present in vapor (gaseous) form. Benzene is a by-product of the refining of petroleum. It is also used in the manufacture of styrene and synthetic rubber, adhesives, sealants, paints, paper coating, detergents, plastics, various organic solvents, and petrochemical products.

Exposure to benzene is primarily the result of breathing its vapors and mists. Liquid benzene can also be absorbed by the skin and ingested. This may results in eye, skin or throat irritation. Benzene exposure may result in the onset of leukemia and may affect the blood forming system, particularly in bone marrow.

1.4.9 Coke Oven Emissions

Coke oven emissions are the result of gases created by the combustion of bitumous coals. The principal industries of concern with respect to coke oven emissions include smelting and thermal electrical generating plants. Inhalation of coke oven emissions has been linked to lung cancer.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

5

1.4.10 Ethylene Oxide

Ethylene oxide is a colorless gas with an ether-like odor at room temperature and pressure. It may be used in the gaseous state or compressed as a liquid. It is a major industrial chemical used largely in the production of ethylene glycol for automotive antifreezes, in the polyester industry and for the production of detergents.

Exposure to humans can occur through inhalation, ingestion and by dermal or eye contact. Short-term exposure to ethylene oxide can cause nausea, headache, weakness, vomiting, drowsiness, un-coordination and irritation of the eyes, nose throat and lungs. Skin contact with ethylene oxide can cause blisters, edema, burns, frostbite, and severe dermatitis. Long term exposure to ethylene oxide can cause skin sensitization, numbing of the sense of smell and respiratory infection.

1.4.11 Isocyanates

Isocyanates are a class of chemicals used in the manufacture of certain plastics, coatings, foams and other products. Isocyanates contain a group of atoms (-NCO) which readily react with certain other types of molecules. They may be found in liquid form (colorless to pale yellow or dark brown and viscous) or solid form (white or yellow in colour). The following products and processes use isocyanates: foams, soft synthetic rubbers, adhesives, sealants, coatings, insulation, packaging, paint hardeners, printing inks, foundry core binders, wire varnish, and textile finishing.

Exposure to isocyanates may occur from inhalation of vapor, mist, or dust. This may cause eye, nose or throat irritation. Liquid isocyanates can damage the skin or eyes on contact; however they are not absorbed into the body through the skin. High exposure can cause chest tightness, bronchitis, bronchospasm, fluid in the lungs and asthmatic attacks. Other health risks include, skin sensitization, rashes and temporary decreases in sharpness of vision.

1.4.12 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

PCBs were commonly used as dielectric fluid in electrical equipment such as transformers and capacitors, and in the ballasts of fluorescent light fixtures and high intensity discharge (HID) lamps. Lamp ballasts are designed to maintain constant electrical current despite variations in applied voltage. The most common fluorescent lamp ballasts are the rapid start ballasts used to operate two (2) four-foot fluorescent light tubes. These ballasts are typically mounted between the tubes on the light fixture and are shielded by a metal cover to reduce heat radiation. The production of PCBs in North America started in 1929 and was banned at the beginning of 1979. After 1981, no manufacturers produced fluorescent lamps with PCB-containing ballasts.

Health effects that have been associated with exposure to PCBs include acne-like skin conditions in adults and neurobehavioral and immunological changes in children. PCBs are known to cause cancer in animals.

1.4.13 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)

Controls on the consumption of ozone depleting substances were initiated with the introduction of the Montreal Protocol in 1987. Within Ontario, the general use of ozone depleting substances is controlled through Regulation 356 of the Environmental Protection Act (EPA). Control of the use of ozone depleting substances as refrigerants is further specified in Regulation 189/94 of the Environmental Protection Act.

Presently, regulation of ozone depleting substances by the EPA is limited to the substances listed below. There is, however, provision within the EPA for the control of additional ozone depleting substances at a future date.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

6

CFC-11 Halon-1211

CFC-12 Halon-1301

CFC-113 Halon-2402

CFC-114

CFC-115

Production of ODS in the form of hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) ceased in Canada in 1993 as a result of their ozone-depleting characteristics. Importation of CFCs into Canada ceased in 1997. The use of these materials is still permitted in existing equipment, but equipment must be serviced by a licensed contractor such that CFCs are contained and not released to the environment during servicing or operation.

Use of the HCFC (R-22), commonly found in air conditioning and refrigeration equipment, is not currently regulated, however strict controls over their manufacture and supply are in place. Under the management of a licensed contractor, equipment containing R-22 does not represent a significant threat to human health or the environment; however, consideration should be given to future phase out of any equipment containing R-22.

The Environmental Protection Act specifies that, effective January 1, 2009, large refrigeration equipment (compressors with a total capacity greater than 22kW) can no longer be refilled with CFC refrigerant. Effective December 31, 2011, this equipment must be converted to an alternate refrigerant or replaced with equipment that uses an alternate refrigerant.

Chillers

Effective January 1, 2009, chillers that were filled with CFC refrigerant could no longer be refilled with CFC refrigerant upon first major overhaul. If a refill is required, the chiller must be converted to a non-CFC refrigerant chiller or replaced with a non-CFC refrigerant chiller. Beginning January 1, 2012, chillers will no longer be operated with CFC refrigerant and this practice must be discontinued.

Exemptions:

Chillers that have undergone a major overhaul may be refilled with a CFC refrigerant if prior to January 1, 2009, the owner submitted a written notice to the Director stating that by December 31, 2011 the equipment will be converted to or replaced by a system that uses a non-CFC refrigerant.

Refills will also be allowed for chillers that have undergone a major overhaul if there is an immediate threat to human health, crops, plant life or animal life foodstuffs on a farm or at a food packing, processing or storage facility. The chiller must be converted or replaced within one year of the date of refill and a notice of the date of refill must be submitted within seven days of the refill to the Director of the Ministry of Environment.

1.4.14 Radioactive Materials

Radiation is defined as energy that travels in the form of waves or high speed particles. Radioactive materials that decay spontaneously produce ionizing radiation. Any living tissue in the human body has the potential to be damaged by ionizing radiation. There are three (3) main routes of exposure to radiation. These are inhalation, ingestion, and direct exposure. Health effects associated with radiation exposure include radiation poisoning and cancer.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

7

1.4.15 Mould

Mould is found in the natural environment and is required for the breakdown of plant debris such as leaves and wood. Mould spores are found in the air in both the indoor and outdoor environments. In order for mould to grow it requires a food source (i.e. gypsum wallboard, carpets, wallpaper, wood, etc.) and moist conditions. Mould can have an impact on human health depending on the species and concentration of the mould. Health effects can include allergies and mucous membrane irritation.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

8

2 Survey Methodology

The survey included a visual assessment for the presence of asbestos, lead, mercury, other Designated Substances, and Hazardous Materials. In addition, materials suspected of containing asbestos as well as paint suspected of containing lead was sampled and sent to an accredited laboratory for testing and analysis. The Site work was carried out on November 14, 2014 by Mr. Benjamin Samba and Mr. Jason McCann. All laboratory certificates of analyses are attached in Appendix A. The following subsections present descriptions of the methodologies used.

2.1 Asbestos

The Designated Substances survey included the identification of potential friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials within the building. All accessible friable and non-friable materials suspected of containing asbestos were sampled. In addition, the condition, accessibility, friability and hazard ranking of the suspected materials were noted.

Building materials suspected of containing asbestos were identified and representative sampling and laboratory testing of these materials was conducted. O. Reg. 278/05 outlines requirements for the collection of multiple samples of each homogeneous material suspected of containing asbestos, as presented in Table 1 O. Reg. 278/05 s. 3 (3).

Table 2-1: O. Reg. 278/05 s. 3(3) - Minimum Asbestos Bulk Material Sample Requirements

Item Type of material Size of area of homogeneous

material

Minimum number of

bulk material samples to be

collected

1.

Surfacing material, including without limitation, material that is applied to surfaces by spraying, by troweling or otherwise, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing materials on structural members

Less than 90 square meters 3

90 or more square meters, but less than 450 square meters

5

450 or more square meters 7

2. Thermal insulation, except as described in item 3

any size 3

3. Thermal insulation patch Less than 2 linear meters or 0.5 square meters

1

4. Other material Any size 3

The number of bulk material samples collected from a homogeneous area were taken in accordance with Table 1 O. Reg. 278/05 s. 3 (3).

Materials suspected of containing asbestos were collected using wetting techniques and hand sampling tools. These materials (approximately one teaspoon full in quantity) were placed in sealable plastic bags and labeled for QA/QC review by exp’s Hazardous Materials Manager. Twenty nine (29) samples of seven (7) potentially asbestos-containing materials were collected from the subject building and were sent to an accredited laboratory for analysis.

A hazard assessment of identified ACMs was also carried out as part of this survey. The rankings of potential hazard range from 1-most hazardous to 4-least hazardous. A decision tree to assist in the Hazard Ranking of the ACM is attached to this report in Appendix D.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

9

All the bulk samples were analyzed by Scientific Analytical Institute (SAI) an independent industrial hygiene laboratory that participates in the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Industrial Hygiene Program (identification #173190) and the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for asbestos fibre analysis (NVLAP certificate# 200664-0).

All the bulk samples were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). The method and procedures used for establishing whether material is asbestos-containing is in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (Test Method EPA/600/R-93/116).

In accordance with the O. Reg. 278/05, if a material was found to contain 0.5% or greater than 0.5% asbestos, additional bulk material samples taken from the same homogeneous materials were not analyzed. This practice is referred to as “Positive Stop” analysis.

The specific locations from where the samples were taken are noted in Table 3-1 in Section 3.2. A chain of custody form containing relevant information accompanied all submissions.

2.2 Lead

Samples of paints suspected of containing lead were collected (one teaspoon in size) and placed in sealed plastic bags and labeled for QA/QC reviewed by our Hazardous Materials Manager. Four (4) paint samples were collected and submitted to an accredited laboratory to determine the presence of lead in the paints. The specific locations from where the samples were taken are noted in Table 3-2 in Section 3.

The samples were analyzed by SAI, an independent industrial hygiene laboratory that participates in the AIHA’s Environmental Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (Certificate #173190) for dust/wipe and paint chip sample analysis.

The specific locations from where the samples were taken are noted in Table 3-2 in Section 3.3. A chain of custody form containing relevant information accompanied all submissions.

2.3 Mercury

A visual survey of the subject building was conducted to determine whether any equipment or devices containing mercury were present. The type, quantity, and location of mercury-containing equipment was noted.

2.4 Silica

A visual survey of the subject building structural materials was made to determine if silica was present.

2.5 Other Designated Substances

A visual survey of the subject building was made to determine if other Designated Substances (acrylonitrile, arsenic, benzene, coke oven emissions, ethylene oxide, isocyanates and vinyl chloride) were present.

2.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

A visual survey of the subject building was conducted to determine if any electrical components which may contain PCBs were present. A representative number of fluorescent light fixtures were disassembled and the ballast codes and producers were then cross referenced with the Environment

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

10

Canada publication - Identification of Lamp Ballasts Containing PCBs, Report EPS 2/CC/2, August 1991, to determine if they contained or were likely to contain PCBs.

2.7 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)

Fixed equipment suspected of containing hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and/or chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) within the subject Site was reviewed. Name plate details from any potential ODS-containing equipment were recorded to determine the likelihood of ODS content.

2.8 Radioactive Materials

A visual survey of the subject building was conducted to determine if any electrical components containing radioactive materials were present.

2.9 Mould

The visual assessment consisted of a walkthrough of the subject building to identify water damaged building materials and/or mould growth. The assessment was a non-destructive evaluation (i.e. assessment above ceilings, test cuts into walls/ceilings, etc. was not conducted).

Moisture measurements gathered from gypsum board were taken with a penetrating Protimeter Moisture Meter. This meter expresses moisture content of wood as a percent (%) and other building materials are expressed as a percent Wood Moisture Equivalent (%WME). Wood is able to rot when it is wetter than 20% and is considered safe below this level. Therefore, wood is deemed wet when readings are above 20%. For building materials other than wood, readings are given as an equivalent to wood and therefore readings above 20% WME, are considered wet.

The tape-lift samples were collected using a Biotape microscope slides. The general approach to tape-lift sampling is to place the Biotape on a suspect area, removing a portion of suspect growth, and placing the Biotape on a microscope slide which is then placed in its dedicated case until opened and analyzed by the laboratory. One (1) tape-lift sample was collected to assess the type of fungal spores present on the assessed surface within the subject building. The analytical results of the tape-lift sample along with sample location are listed in Table 3-4 in Section 3.16, and the laboratory analysis report is included in Appendix A.

Air sampling was performed to assess the type and relative concentrations of fungal spores of the air space within the building. The air sampling was performed using a Zefon Biopump Sampling Pump in combination with Air-O-Cell® cassettes. The Air-O-Cell® cassettes collect a wide range of airborne aerosols including mould spores, pollen, insect parts, skin cell fragments, fibers, etc. The Air-O-Cell® cassettes collect both viable and non-viable mould spore specimens and therefore provides a total spore count. The air samples were collected at a flow rate of 15 liters per minute (L/min) for a duration of 5 minutes (min) for a total air volume of 75 liters. The analytical results of the air samples along with sample locations are listed in Table 3-5 in Section 3.16 and the laboratory analysis report is included in Appendix A.

All samples for the identification of mould were analyzed by EMC Scientific Inc., an independent environmental microbiology laboratory that participates in the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Testing (EMPAT) Program (identification #174080) and is staffed with experienced and trained mycologists. A chain of custody form containing relevant information accompanied all submissions.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

11

2.10 Survey Limitations

This report reflects only the observations, findings, and analysis of materials sampled at the time of the survey. Analytical results reflect the sampled materials at the specific sampling locations. Visually similar materials were referenced to specific analyzed samples.

Certain materials which may contain asbestos were not sampled to avoid damage and compromising the integrity of building systems. For instance, caulking materials were not sampled to ensure that the integrity of the window seals remains intact. To avoid possible damage to the roof, nullifying any roofing warranty and compromising the building envelope, the survey did not include sampling of exterior roofing materials. Cement (transite) columns supporting the entrance portico were not sampled to ensure the integrity of the column remains intact.

These materials noted are non-friable and should be considered to contain asbestos until sampling confirms otherwise.

Fibreglass pipe straight insulation was not submitted for analysis as it can be identified visually and was never manufactured with asbestos.

In general, the survey was limited to accessible areas of the subject building. An area enclosed by gypsum board, plaster, underneath multiple layers of flooring or panelling, boiler refractory, etc., where minor or major demolition is required to gain entry, is considered inaccessible and was not included as part of this assessment. Where possible, areas above false or plastered ceilings were assessed either by lifting suspended ceiling tiles or through previously made access hatches.

Intrusive sampling was not conducted during the Site visit. It is possible designated substances to be present in inaccessible areas such as behind walls, above ceilings or within bulkheads of the subject building. Exp’s survey of the subject building was based on clear, unobstructed visual identification of suspect Designated Substances and Hazardous Building Materials.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

12

3 Results and Findings

3.1 Property Description

The building located at the afore-mentioned property is a single storey church type building with a

partial basement and crawl space. The footprint area of the subject building is approximately 4,000

square feet. Based on information provided by the site representatives, the building was originally

constructed circa 1868 and is therefore over one-hundred (100) years of age.

The subject building was not occupied at the time of the Site visit.

The interior spaces within the building generally consist of a banquet hall with a kitchen on the

eastern portion, masonic hall on the western portion, main lobby, washrooms as well as

miscellaneous storage and utility spaces. The floor finishes consist of a combination of hardwood

flooring, carpeting, ceramic floor tiles as well as vinyl flooring. The ceiling finishes consist of a

combination of painted gypsum board ceilings, suspended ceiling tiles, as well as painted metal

ceilings.

The two mezzanines are located in two separate locations. One is accessed from the hall via ladder

and the second one from the meeting room via the stairs located in the north-west corner of the

meeting room. Mechanical closet is located in the basement. The attic space is accessed through a

hatch, via ladder, from the mezzanine located inside the hall.

The building was observed to be constructed with brick exterior walls. Interior walls were either

finished with plaster or gypsum board. Interior ceilings were finished with plain gypsum board,

suspended ceiling tiles or metal pan ceiling. Floors were generally covered with vinyl floor tiles, wood

or carpet.

The roofing system of the building is comprised of a sloped roof consisting of asphalt shingles. The

roof surface was reviewed from grade level.

The building is heated by a natural gas fired forced air furnaces located in the basement accessed

through the exterior. Domestic hot water is accomplished by an electric hot water heater located in a

closet. Domestic hot and cold water lines observed in the crawlspace appeared to be un-insulated.

3.2 Asbestos

The laboratory test results for the asbestos samples collected are summarized in Table 3-1 below.

Table 3-1: Asbestos Sampling Locations and Laboratory Results

Sample

ID Location Material

Asbestos Type

and Content Friability

BS 1.1 Hall Mezzanine Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A



exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

13

Sample


Asbestos Type


BS 1.4 Men's Washroom Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A

BS 1.5 Mechanical area,

Crawlspace Drywall Joint Compound None Detected N/A





BS 2.1 Hall Mezzanine Plaster – Finish and Base Layers None Detected N/A




BS 2.5 Hallway Plaster – Finish and Base Layers None Detected N/A



BS 3.1 Kitchen

Vinyl Floor Tile

(12"x12" Beige) None Detected N/A

Mastic

BS 3.2 Kitchen

Vinyl Floor Tile


Mastic

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

14

Sample


Asbestos Type


BS 3.3 Kitchen

Vinyl Floor Tile


Mastic

BS 4.1 Hallway

Suspended Ceiling Tile

(24"x48" Random medium fissures with hole and

pinholes)

2% Amosite

Non-Friable BS 4.2 Hallway



pinholes) Samples Not Analyzed due

to Positive Stop

BS 4.3 Hallway



pinholes)

BS 5.1 Attic Blown-in insulation None Detected N/A



BS 6.1 Crawlspace Plaster Debris – Finish and Base

Layers None Detected N/A





BS 7.1 Crawlspace Vinyl Floor Tile Debris 2% Chrysotile Non-Friable

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

15

Sample


Asbestos Type


BS 7.2 Crawlspace Vinyl Floor Tile Debris Samples Not Analyzed due

to Positive Stop

Non-Friable

BS 7.3 Crawlspace Vinyl Floor Tile Debris

Notes:

N/A = Not Applicable;

Sample Not Analyzed Due to Positive Stop = In accordance with the O. Reg. 278/05, if a

material was found to contain 0.5% or greater than 0.5% asbestos, additional bulk material

samples taken from the same homogeneous materials is not required to be analyzed; and,

Detailed summary tables are located in Appendix B presenting the locations, approximate

quantities and condition of the ACMs. The sample numbers in this Table are denoted as BS-

## for the material that was sampled. Materials that were visually similar to previously

sampled materials, and therefore were not re-sampled, are denoted as V-##, corresponding

to the sampled materials sample number.

3.2.1 Friable Asbestos

Friable asbestos-containing materials were not identified within the subject building at the time of the Site visit.

3.2.2 Non - Friable Asbestos

Non-friable asbestos-containing suspended ceiling tiles, measuring 24 inches x 48 inches, random

medium fissures with holes and pinholes in appearance, were identified within the subject building.

The suspended ceiling tiles were found to contain 2% Amosite asbestos. Refer to Photograph No.1 in

Appendix C.

Non-friable asbestos-containing vinyl floor tile debris was identified in the substructure (i.e.

crawlspace) of the building. The vinyl floor tile debris was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.

Refer to Photograph No. 2 in Appendix C.

Suspect non-friable asbestos-containing cement (transite) columns were observed supporting the

entrance portico. Refer to Photograph No. 3 in Appendix C.

3.2.3 Hazard Assessment of ACMs

The identified confirmed and suspect non-friable asbestos-containing materials, with the exception of

vinyl floor tile debris located in the crawlspace, were observed to be in good condition with low

potential for disturbance during everyday activities. These materials were assigned a Hazard Rank of

4 (Low Risk) and can remain in place if managed in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

The non-friable asbestos-containing vinyl floor tile debris located in the crawlspace have potential for

disturbance during maintenance activities within the crawl space and were assigned a Hazard Rank

of 2 (Moderate Risk) and should be removed.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

16

3.3 Lead

Four (4) paint samples from the subject building were analyzed for lead content. The results are as follows:

Table 3-2: Lead Sampling Locations and Laboratory Results

Sample ID

Sample Location Colour Lead

Concentration (% weight)

Pb 1 Wall, Storage Off White 0.091%

Pb 2 Storage door Blue 0.013%

Pb 3 Wall, Meeting Room Stage Aqua 0.059%

Pb 4 Wall, Hallway above ceiling tile Dark Blue 0.10%

Based on the analytical results, the off white, blue, aqua and dark blue colour paint samples collected from the subject building revealed lead concentrations above the guideline of 0.009% by weight set out by the regulation Surface Coating Materials made under the Hazardous Products Act but are below the guideline of 0.5% by dry weight set out by United States – Environmental Protection Agency – Housing and Urban Development Guideline. As such, these paints are classified lead containing. The aqua and the dark blue lead based paints were observed is some areas of the building to be peeling or flaking at the time of the Site visit.

Batteries suspected of containing lead-acid were noted in the emergency lights throughout the main

doors leading to the outside of the building. Refer to Photograph No.4 in Appendix C.

It should be noted that additional areas within the building identified to contain similar paint finishes as

those shown above shall be treated as outlined above, unless additional sampling and analytical

results determine otherwise.

Laboratory certificate of analysis for the paint samples is included in Appendix A.

Lead may also be present in the following materials in the subject building:

Solder used on domestic water lines;

Solder used in bell fittings for cast iron pipes;

Solder used in electrical equipment; and,

Lead in these additional materials is considered to be in stable form and as such, is not expected to be of concern with respect to renovation/demolition activities.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

17

3.4 Mercury

Mercury is likely to be present in vapour form in the fluorescent light tubes found within the subject buildings. Approximately twenty (20) fluorescent light tubes were observed inside the subject building.

Thermostats, throughout the subject buildings, were observed to be electrical type and as such do not contain mercury.

3.5 Silica

Silica is expected to be present in building materials such as concrete, brick, mortar and ceramic tiles.

3.6 Vinyl Chloride

Generally, vinyl chloride (monomer) is likely to be present in stable form within poly-vinyl-chloride (PVC) piping and conduits and as a component of interior finishes.

3.7 Acrylonitrile

Acrylonitrile may be present in stable form in paints and adhesives located throughout the subject building.

3.8 Arsenic

Arsenic or arsenic compounds may be present in stable form in paints and adhesives located throughout the subject building.

3.9 Benzene

Benzene may be present in stable form in roofing materials, paints, and adhesives located throughout the subject building. In addition, benzene may also be present in hydraulic oils found in machinery such as air compressors, machine gears and switches, etc.

3.10 Coke Oven Emissions

Coke oven emissions were not found and were not expected to be found in the subject building based on the Site assessment and building appearance.

3.11 Ethylene Oxides

It is not expected that ethylene oxides are of concern with respect to the subject building.

3.12 Isocyanates

Isocyanate compounds may be present in stable form in paint finishes, varnishes, polyurethane plastics, synthetic rubbers, foams and adhesives.


Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are typically found in fluorescent lamp ballasts, transformers, and other electrical equipment containing insulating fluids.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

18

3.13.1 Light Ballasts

The subject building contained approximately ten (10) fluorescent light ballasts. A representative number of the total ballasts were inspected at random. It should be noted that there is one (1) ballast in each fluorescent light fixture. The assessed ballasts indicated that they did not contain PCBs. Refer to Photographs No.5 in Appendix C.

Table 6 provides manufacturer information and PCB content for the fluorescent light ballasts assessed within the subject buildings.

Table 3-3: Fluorescent Light Ballasts

Approximate Number of Fluorescent Light Ballasts

Throughout the Subject Buildings

Assessed Ballast Manufacturer and Serial Number

Presence of PCBs

10 Ballast (throughout the subject building)

Advance

R-2S40-I-TP Non-PCB’s

3.13.2 Transformers

A review of the manufacturer’s label determined that the transformers observed within the subject buildings are dry type and as such do not contain PCBs.


A visual assessment for equipment which may contain ozone depleting substances was conducted. One (1) refrigerator and two (2) air conditioning (AC) units were noted during the site visit at the subject building. The refrigerator is located in the kitchen and the air conditioning units are located outside, on the south side of the building.

The refrigerator located in the kitchen was listed as containing refrigerant R-134a. Refrigerant R134A is not classified as ODS.

The air conditioning (AC) units located outside, on the south side of the building were listed as containing refrigerant R22. Refrigerant R22 is a hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFC) and is considered to be ozone depleting substance.


Smoke detectors suspected to contain radioactive materials were observed throughout the subject building.

3.16 Mould

3.16.1 Visual Assessment

The visual assessment consisted of a walkthrough of the subject building to identify mould and water damaged building materials and/or mould growth. The following was noted:

Crawl Space

No visible mould growth or water damage was observed on the building materials within the

crawl space or basement.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

19

Main Entrance/Corridor

No visible mould growth or water damaged building materials were observed in the corridor.

Moisture level measurements of the plaster and gypsum board walls were less the 16% WME,

which is considered to be dry.

Hall/Kitchen

No visible mould growth or water damaged building materials were observed in the hall/kitchen.

Moisture level measurements of the plaster and gypsum board walls were less the 14% WME,

which is considered to be dry.

Meeting Room

Suspect mould growth (approximately 3 ft2) was observed in the northwest corner on the plaster

wall on the mezzanine of the meeting room. A tape-lift sample (Sample ID: TL-1) was collected

for the identification and confirmation of mould growth.

Moisture level measurements of the plaster on the mezzanine were 34% WME, which is

considered to be wet.

Washrooms

No visible mould growth was observed on the building materials in the washrooms.

Water damage (i.e. staining) was noted on the gypsum wallboard underneath the sink in

women’s washroom.

Moisture level measurements of the gypsum board walls were less the 11% WME, which is

considered to be dry.

3.16.2 Tape Lift Sampling Results

The following table summarizes the sample location and presence and type of mould growth identified (if any) on the tape-lift sample taken from the sampled area:

Table 3-4: Summary of Tape Lift Sampling

Sample ID Sample Location Mould Identified Mould Growth

TL-1 Meeting Room –

Mezzanine Level – Northwest Corner

Acremonium Penicillium

Yes

The analytical results confirmed the presence of the mould growth on the sampled plaster wall on the mezzanine level of the meeting room within the building.

3.16.3 Air Sampling Results

The following table illustrates the sample locations and mould spore types and concentrations of the air samples collected from within the subject areas as well as the reference samples:

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

20

Table 3-5 – Summary of Air Sampling Results

Sample

ID Sample Location Mould Spore

Concentration

(Spores/m3)

AOC1 Outdoor Environment (Reference Sample)

Ascospores Aspergillus/Penicillium type

Basidiospores Cladosporium

Colorless Epicoccum

27 227 13 347 53 13

TOTAL 680

AOC2 Main Level - Hall


Basidiospores Chaetomium Cladosporium

Colorless

13 627 27 27 373 147

TOTAL 1,213

AOC3 Main Level – Meeting

Room



Colorless Rusts

13 1,707

13 267 320 13

TOTAL 2,333

AOC4 Outdoor Environment (Reference Sample)



Colorless Epicoccum

13 40 13 400 107 27

TOTAL 600

Currently, there are no standards or guidelines regarding mould air sample results. Typically the approach employed during the interpretation of mould air sampling results relies on comparisons of indoor spore types and concentrations to outdoor spore types and concentrations. Generally, indoor environments free of mould amplification are expected to have a similar fungal ecology (similar mould spore types and relatively similar concentrations) to the outdoor reference samples.

The analytical results indicate an elevated concentration of Aspergillus/Penicillium type spores in the air samples collected from the meeting room when compared to the outdoor reference samples. Chaetomium spores were identified in the air sample collected in the hall that was not found in the either of the outdoor reference samples. The Chaetomium fungal organism is a primary colonizer associated with water damaged building materials and are indicative of fungal growth. The presence and/or concentrations of these spores suggest the likely presence of mould amplification within the building at the time of sampling.

There are some guidelines on interpreting mould air sampling results that allow for a “background” level of indoor to outdoor spores which can be used to help interpret air sampling results (Guidelines for Interpreting Numerical Data of Non-viable (Spore Traps) and Viable Airborne Mould Samples, Mold & Bacteria Consulting Laboratories (MBL) Inc., 2004).

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

21

4 Conclusions and Recommendations

On the basis of our walk-through examination of the building, representative sampling and laboratory analysis of suspected asbestos and lead containing materials, the following conclusions and recommendations are presented.

4.1 Asbestos

4.1.1 Friable Asbestos

Friable asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were not identified within the subject building at the time of the Site visit.

4.1.2 Non - Friable Asbestos

Non-friable asbestos-containing suspended ceiling tiles, measuring 24 inches x 48 inches, random

medium fissures with holes and pinholes in appearance, were identified within the subject building.

The suspended ceiling tiles were found to contain 2% Amosite asbestos. Refer to Photograph No.1 in

Appendix C.

Non-friable asbestos-containing vinyl floor tile debris was identified in the substructure (i.e.

crawlspace) of the building. The vinyl floor tile debris was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.

Refer to Photograph No. 2 in Appendix C.

Suspect non-friable asbestos-containing cement (transite) columns were observed supporting the

entrance portico. Refer to Photograph No. 3 in Appendix C.

The identified confirmed and suspect non-friable asbestos-containing materials, with the exception of

vinyl floor tile debris located in the crawlspace, were observed to be in good condition with low

potential for disturbance during everyday activities. These materials were assigned a Hazard Rank of

4 (Low Risk) and can remain in place if managed in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

The non-friable asbestos-containing vinyl floor tile debris located in the crawlspace have potential for

disturbance during maintenance activities within the crawl space and were assigned a Hazard Rank

of 2 (Moderate Risk) and should be removed.

Vinyl floor tile debris located in the basement crawlspace should be removed following Type 1 asbestos abatement work procedures as detailed in O. Reg. 278/05. The waste generated must be disposed of as asbestos waste under O. Reg. 347;

Prior to the renovation or demolition activities which may disturb the caulking and roofing

materials of the subject building, samples of these materials must be collected and

analyzed in accordance with Ontario Regulation 278/05 to determine the presence or

absence of asbestos. If identified as ACMs, these materials must be removed following

appropriate asbestos abatement procedures (i.e. Type 1/2/3 as outlined in O. Reg.

278/05 and disposed of as asbestos waste in accordance with O. Reg. 347;

Prior to renovation/demolition activities which may disturb suspect asbestos-containing

cement (transite) column, this material must be sampled and analyzed as per O. Reg.

278/05 to confirm the asbestos content. If confirmed as ACM, this material shall be

removed following appropriate asbestos abatement work procedures (Type 1/2/3) as

detailed in O. Reg. 278/05 and disposed of as asbestos waste under O. Reg. 347;

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

22

Prior to the renovation/demolition activities which will disturb the asbestos-containing

materials, these materials must be removed following appropriate asbestos abatement

work procedures (Type 1/2/3) as detailed in O. Reg. 278/05 and disposed of as asbestos

waste under O. Reg. 347;

Any suspect asbestos-containing material uncovered during the course of

renovation/demolition activities that is not mentioned in this report shall be considered

asbestos-containing as per O. Reg. 278/05, until sampling and analysis as per O. Reg.

278/05 indicates otherwise. If identified as ACM, this material must be removed following

appropriate asbestos abatement procedures as specified in O. Reg. 278/05 and disposed

of as asbestos waste under O. Reg. 347;

Sub-trades working with or in close proximity to asbestos-containing material must be

informed of its presence, and,

Ontario Regulation 278/05, made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act,

specifies that an Asbestos Management Plan (AMP) must be implemented if any

asbestos-containing materials (friable or non-friable) are known to be present in the

building and are to remain in place. An inventory of asbestos-containing materials must

be kept on site. All materials must be routinely inspected to ensure no damage has

occurred and the inventory must be updated once in each 12-month period and as may

be required based on expected changing site conditions, abatement and/or renovation

activities.

Refer to Appendix B for the locations and approximate quantities of identified ACMs.

4.2 Lead

The off-white, blue, aqua, and dark blue paint within the subject building was identified as lead-

containing paint. The aqua and the dark blue lead based paints were observed is some areas of the

building to be peeling or flaking at the time of the Site visit.

As the concentration of lead in the sampled paints is less than 0.5% by dry weight, as such, the

disturbance of building materials where lead-containing paint (i.e. lead concentration between 0.5% -

0.009% by dry weight) is intact to substrate will not expose a construction or maintenance worker to

lead in excess of the TWA for inhalation. Provided that, general hygiene measures including but not

limited to: no smoking, eating, chewing gum or dinking occurs with the work area and washing of

hands and face prior to leaving the work area are provided and implemented. General measures to

control dust and fume generation and a basic hygiene program consistent with Ontario’s Ministry of

Labour Guideline - “Lead on Construction Projects” issued by the Ministry of Labour, dated April 2011

should be adequate to control worker exposure. It is also recommended that the contractor/employer

implement a lead monitoring/dust control program to maintain airborne concentrations of lead below

the TWA and ensure the effectiveness of the hygiene measures.

Batteries suspected of containing lead-acid were noted in the emergency lights throughout the main

doors leading to the outside of the building. Refer to Photograph No. 4 in Appendix C.

The peeling lead-containing paints shall be removed following Type 2a or Type 3 operations as described in the guideline, “Lead on Construction Projects” issued by the Ministry of Labour, dated April 2011 and disposed of as lead waste as per O. Reg. 347;

Any peeling or flaking paints uncovered during the course of renovation/demolition activities that are not mentioned in this report shall be considered to be lead-based until sampling and analysis indicates otherwise;

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

23

There is no need to remove lead-based paint that is firmly bound to the substrate. If during renovation/demolition activities, lead-based paint located in the work areas is found to be creating a potential dust hazard, the paint shall be removed by following Type 2a or Type 3 operations as described in the guideline, “Lead on Construction Projects” issued by the Ministry of Labour, dated April 2011 and disposed of as lead waste as per O. Reg. 347;

Manual demolition (i.e. striking a wall with sledge hammer or similar tools) of lead painted walls or removal of lead-based coatings/materials by scraping or sanding using non-powered hand tools should be conducted following Type 2a operations as described in the guideline, “Lead on Construction Projects” issued by the Ministry of Labour, dated April 2011 and disposed of as lead waste as per O. Reg. 347;

There is no need to remove suspect lead-based paint that is firmly bound to the substrate. If during renovation/demolition activities, suspect lead-based paint located in the work areas is found to be creating a potential dust hazard, the paint shall be tested and if found to be lead-based, be removed by following Type 2a or Type 3 operations as described in the guideline, “Lead on Construction Projects” issued by the Ministry of Labour, dated April 2011 and disposed of as lead waste as per O. Reg. 347;

Sub-trades working with or in close proximity to lead based paint should be informed of its presence;

Prior to the disposal of building materials with lead-based paint firmly bound to the substrate, a leachate test (TCLP analysis) of representative demolition debris is recommended to determine the material’s leachable concentration of lead. Potential recycling locations for demolition waste should be advised of the TCLP analytical results.

4.3 Mercury

Mercury vapours within the fluorescent light tubes, pose no risk to workers or occupants provided the

fluorescent light tubes remain intact and undisturbed. Prior to renovation activities, all mercury

containing devices which may be disturbed must be removed and stored in a safe, secure location or

disposed of following the requirements of Ontario Regulation 490/09.

Prior to renovation/demolition activities, mercury-containing equipment which may be

disturbed shall be removed and recycled by a licensed contractor.

4.4 Silica

Precautions should be taken as required during demolition projects on concrete (i.e. coring through concrete slabs, demolition of masonry, etc.) to ensure that workers’ exposure levels to silica does not exceed 0.05 mg/m

3. This can be achieved by:

o providing the workers with respiratory protection;

o wetting the surface of the materials to prevent dust emissions; and,

o Providing workers with facilities to properly wash prior to exiting the work area.

Renovation/Demolition work that is likely to impact silica-containing materials should be carried out in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Ontario Ministry of Labour document entitled “Guideline: Silica on Construction Projects”, dated April, 2011.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

24

4.5 Other Designated Substances

Other Designated Substances (acrylonitrile, arsenic, coke oven emissions, ethylene oxide, isocyanates, benzene or vinyl chloride) are either not expected to be present, in stable form, or not expected to be present in the building in sufficient quantities to cause an exceedence of Ministry of Labour exposure guidelines.


The subject building contained approximately ten (10) fluorescent light ballasts. A representative number of the total ballasts were inspected at random. It should be noted that there is one (1) ballast in each fluorescent light fixture. The assessed ballasts indicated that they did not contain PCBs. Refer to Photographs No. 5 in Appendix C.

The transformers observed within the subject buildings are dry type and do not contain PCBs.

Prior to renovation/demolition activities which may impact potential PCB-containing light

ballasts, these ballasts shall be removed from their fixtures and inspected to determine the

presence of PCBs; and,

All ballasts listed as PCB-containing or “undetermined” to contain PCBs shall be treated as

PCB-containing and disposed of as PCB waste by a licensed contractor.


Exp observed equipment (Air Conditioning Units) that were suspected to contain CFCs/HCFCs within the subject building. While the use of HCFCs found to be present is not currently regulated, amounts available for sale are strictly controlled. Maintenance of ODS-containing equipment should continue to be completed in compliance with Ontario Regulation 189/94 by a licensed refrigeration contractor.

Prior to the renovation/demolition of the building involving the noted materials, all equipment containing or suspected to contain ODS must be assessed and decommissioned by a licensed contractor such that ozone depleting substances are contained and not released to the environment.


Smoke detectors/alarms suspected of containing radioactive materials were observed within the

building.

Prior to any renovation/demolition activities which may disturb equipment containing

radioactive materials, this equipment must be removed by a qualified firm

(transportation/disposal) with the appropriate level of protection in accordance with applicable

Regulations and Guidelines, including the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act (TDGA);

and,

The materials should be returned to the manufacturer where possible.

4.9 Mould

The analytical results of the air samples indicated the likely presence of mould amplification within the

building at the time of sampling. The tape-lift sampling results confirmed the presence of mould

growth on the plaster on the mezzanine level of the meeting room within the building.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

25

It is important to note that the health risks associated with mould are largely individual dependent and

depend on many aspects including type and length of exposure, type of mould spores present, and

individual health issues such as weak immune system, asthma, allergies, etc. Based on these

individual dependent factors and the fact that there are a large number of mould species that can be

identified growing in a building, the establishment of mould exposure levels has not been possible.

Based on these factors Health Canada has recommended (for residential buildings) “to control

humidity and diligently repair any water damage in residences to prevent mould growth and to clean

thoroughly any visible or concealed mould growing in residential buildings”. Although these

guidelines are for residential buildings, they are applicable to occupied buildings.

Due to the range of reactions to various types of mould (from no effect to serious), and the fact that

there are no standards currently in place for the assessment of the risks associated with mould, this

report does not discuss the health effects of exposure to mould, nor the implications of same. The

purpose of this report is only to identify locations of mould growth and/or water damage, either

visually or confirmed by sampling, where observed within the reviewed locations of the building, and

assess the extent of such damage.

Based on the visual observations and the analytical results at the time of the Site visit, exp

recommends the following:

The removal of mould and water damaged building materials identified within the building

should be carried out following appropriate remediation work procedures (Level 1/2/3) as

outlined in the Canadian Construction Association (CCA) document “Mould Guidelines for the

Canadian Construction Industry” (CCA document 82-2004);

An intrusive mould assessment (i.e. making access cuts in to the plaster and gypsum board

walls) should be conducted to determine the extent of water and mould damaged building

materials; and,

A building science assessment should be conducted to determine the source of water

intrusions and action of repair.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

26

5 General Limitations

The services performed and outlined herein were based in part, upon visual observations of the building. Our opinion cannot be extended to portions of the building that were unavailable for direct observation by objects or coverings at the time of our Site visit.

Any of our observations relating to hazardous and toxic materials and asbestos in the environment at the building are described in this report. Where testing was performed, it was executed in accordance with our contract for these services. It should be noted that other compounds or materials not tested for may be present in the environment.

The objective of this report was to audit the environmental conditions at the building within the context of our contract with respect to existing Regulations and Guidelines within the applicable jurisdiction. Compliance of past and current owners with applicable local, provincial and federal government laws and regulations was not included in our contract for services.

The conclusions of this report are based, in part, on the information provided by others and any testing and analyses described in the report. The possibility remains that unexpected environmental conditions may be encountered at the building in locations not explored. Should such an event occur, exp should be notified in order that we may determine if modifications to our conclusions are necessary.

This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted environmental study and/or engineering practices. No other warranties, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional services provided under the terms of our contract and included in this report.

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Town of Ajax in accordance with accepted environmental study and/or engineering practices for a Designated Substances Survey. No other warranties, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional services provided under the terms of the Survey and included in this report. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any part hereof, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Exp accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.

We trust the above report meets with your approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Appendix A – Laboratory Results

Attached are copies of the original Certificates of Analysis provided by the laboratory. The data contained in these analyses is to be read only in conjunction with the report to which it is attached.

Since the laboratory data contains scientific terms and references, only trained persons familiar with sampling and laboratory methods should attempt to interpret the data contained in the Certificates of Analysis.

By Polarized Light MicroscopyEPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020

LAB #173190

1422635Lab Order ID:

BRM-00212250-B0, Doric Pickering Masonic Lodge 457 Kingston Road West, Ajax, ON

Project:

11/18/2014Date Received:

11/24/2014Date Reported:

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab NotesAsbestos Fibrous

ComponentsNon-Fibrous Components

Attributes

Treatment

Benjamin SambaJason McCann

Attn:

1422635_PLMAnalysis ID:

Customer: EXP Services Inc1595 Clark BlvdBrampton ON L6T 4V1

None DetectedBS 1.1 Drywall Joint Compound

WhiteNon FibrousHomogeneous

Crushed1422635PLM_1

Other100%



Crushed1422635PLM_2

Other100%



Crushed1422635PLM_3

Other100%



Crushed1422635PLM_4

Other100%



Crushed1422635PLM_5

Other100%



Crushed1422635PLM_6

Other100%



Crushed1422635PLM_7

Other100%

None DetectedBS 2.1 - A Plaster

finish


Crushed1422635PLM_8

Other100%

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommended that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogeneous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of “None Detected” by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Page 1 of 6

Approved SignatoryAnalyst

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Bart Huber (45)


LAB #173190



Project:



Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description



Attributes

Treatment


Attn:



None DetectedBS 2.1 - B Plaster

base

GrayNon FibrousHeterogeneous

Crushed1422635PLM_30

Hair Other2% 98%


finish


Crushed1422635PLM_9

Other100%


base



Hair Other2% 98%


finish



Other100%


base



Hair Other2% 98%


finish



Other100%


base



Hair Other2% 98%


finish



Other100%


Page 2 of 6



Bart Huber (45)


LAB #173190



Project:



Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description



Attributes

Treatment


Attn:




base



Hair Other2% 98%


finish



Other100%


base



Hair Other2% 98%


finish



Other100%


base



Hair Other2% 98%

None DetectedBS 3.1 - A

Vinyl Floor Tile, 12"x12" Beige

tile

BeigeNon FibrousHomogeneous

Dissolved1422635PLM_15

Other100%

None DetectedBS 3.1 - B


mastic

YellowNon FibrousHomogeneous


Other100%



tile



Other100%


Page 3 of 6



Bart Huber (45)


LAB #173190



Project:



Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description



Attributes

Treatment


Attn:





mastic



Other100%



tile



Other100%



mastic



Other100%

2% AmositeBS 4.1

Suspended Ceiling Tile, 24"x48" Random medium fissures with hole and pinholes

WhiteFibrousHomogeneous

Teased1422635PLM_18

Fiber Glass Cellulose

Other 70% 20%

8%

Not AnalyzedBS 4.2


1422635PLM_19

Not AnalyzedBS 4.3


1422635PLM_20

None DetectedBS 5.1 Blown-in insulation

BrownFibrousHomogeneous

Teased1422635PLM_21

Cellulose Other98% 2%



Teased1422635PLM_22



Page 4 of 6



Bart Huber (45)


LAB #173190



Project:



Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description



Attributes

Treatment


Attn:





Teased1422635PLM_23


None DetectedBS 6.1 - A Plaster Debris

finish



Other100%

None DetectedBS 6.1 - B Plaster Debris

base



Hair Other2% 98%


finish



Other100%


base



Hair Other2% 98%


finish



Other100%


base



Hair Other2% 98%

2% ChrysotileBS 7.1 - A Vinyl Floor Tile Debris

tile

GrayNon FibrousHomogeneous


Other98%


Page 5 of 6



Bart Huber (45)


LAB #173190



Project:



Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description



Attributes

Treatment


Attn:



None DetectedBS 7.1 - B Vinyl Floor Tile Debris

mastic

BlackNon FibrousHomogeneous


Other100%

Not AnalyzedBS 7.2 - A Vinyl Floor Tile Debris

tile1422635PLM_28


mastic



Other100%

Not AnalyzedBS 7.3 - A Vinyl Floor Tile Debris

tile1422635PLM_29


mastic



Other100%


Page 6 of 6



Bart Huber (45)

EXP Services Inc1595 Clark BlvdBrampton ON L6T 4V1

Customer:

Analysis ID: 1422642_PBP

Attn: Benjamin SambaJason McCann

Date Reported: 11/24/2014

Date Received: 11/18/2014

Project: BRM-00212250-B0, Doric PickeringMasonic Lodge 457 Kingston Road West,

Lab Order ID: 1422642

Lab Notes

Description

Lab Sample ID

Sample ID

Analysis for Lead Concentrationin Paint Chips

by Flame Atomic Absorption SpectroscopyEPA SW-846 3rd Ed. Method No. 3050B/Method No. 7420

Analytical Sensitivity

(% by weight)(g)

Mass Concentration

(% by weight)

1422642PBP_1

Off-whitePb 10.002%0.0751 0.091%

1422642PBP_2

BluePb 20.003%0.0497 0.013%

1422642PBP_3

AquaPb 30.002%0.0802 0.059%

1422642PBP_4

Dark bluePb 40.002%0.0780 0.10%

The quality control samples run with the samples in this report have passed all EPA required specifications unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to the samplestested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by AIHA or any

other agency of the U.S. government. (R.L. = 0.01 wt.%)

Melissa Sharps (4)


Analyst Laboratory Director

Page 1 of 1pbRpt_3.4.04/pbCalc_3.4.0

1

EMC Scientific Inc . 5800 Ambler Drive, Suite 100, Mississauga, ON L4W 4J4 Tel 905 629 9247, Fax 905 629 2607AIHA EMPAT Participant (Lab ID# 174080)

Page 1 of 1

To:Jason McCann EMC LAB REPORT NUMBER:

Job/Project Name:Job/Project No: No. of Samples: 4Sample Type: Air-O-Cell Date Received:

L6T 4V1 Analysis Method(s):Date Analyzed: Date Reported:Analyst: Weizhong Liu, Ph.D., MycologistApproved By:

raw ct. % spores/m3raw ct. % spores/m3

raw ct. % spores/m3raw ct. % spores/m3

raw ct. % spores/m3

Arthrinium

2 4 27 1 1 13 1 1 13 1 2 13 17 33 227 47 52 627 128 73 1707 3 7 40 1 2 13 2 2 27 1 1 13 1 2 13

Cercospora 2 2 27

Cladosporium 26 51 347 28 31 373 20 11 267 30 67 400 Colorless 4 8 53 11 12 147 24 14 320 8 18 107

Drechslera/Bipolaris group Epicoccum 1 2 13 2 4 27 Fusarium Nigrospora Oidium

1 1 13

51 91 175 45

1. Aspergillus/Penicillium type spores may include those of Acremonium, Paecilomyces, Trichoderma and others.

4. Unidentified spores are those lacking distinguishable characteristics for correct identification. Colorless are colorless spores lacking distinguishable characteristics.5. These results are only related to the sample(s) analyzed.

2+3+

Chaetomium

Curvularia

Fungal fragments (0-3 +) 0+2+Non-fungal material (0-3 +)

Ulocladium

0+

AOC2

Nov 14/14

hall

229350

meeting rm

0+

0.075

3. The presence of a large amount of dust debris may obscure some spores to be counted. Spore counts from samples with 3 + non-fungal material

TOTAL SPORES/M3

Note: 680

2. A scale of 0 + to 3 + (indicating increasing amount) is used to rate abundance of fungal fragments and non-fungal material, with 3+ indicating the most abundance.

1,2132+

exp. Services Inc.1595 Clark BoulevardBrampton, Ontario

Description/Location

Client's Sample ID AOC1229349EMC Lab Sample No.

Sampling Date Nov 14/14

beforeOutdoor -

6002,333

Number of spores/sample0+

Nov 14/14

Smuts, Periconia , MyxomycetesStachybotrys

Pithomyces

Fungal SporesAlternaria

Ascospores

BasidiosporesAspergillus/Penicillium type

Laboratory Analysis Report

Nov 19/14

Nov 14/14

Nov 19/14

50606

Fungal Spore Counting

457 Kingston Rd. W.

0.075after

Outdoor -

Air Volume (m3)

Nov 14/14

and/or 3 + fungal material may be treated as under-counts.

0.075

Unidentified spores

Rusts

Main level - Main level -

0.075

Fajun Chen, Ph.D., Principal Mycologist

229351 229352AOC4AOC3

EMC Scientific Inc. 5800 Ambler Drive Suite 100 Mississauga Ontario L4W 4J4 T. 905 629 9247 F. 905 629 2607 AIHA EMPAT Participant (Lab ID# 174080)

Page 1 of 1

Laboratory Analysis Report To:

Jason McCann EMC LAB REPORT NUMBER: 50607 exp. Services Inc. Job/Project Name: 457 Kingston Rd. W. 1595 Clark Boulevard Job/Project No: No. of Samples: 1 Brampton, Ontario Sample Type: Tape Lift Date Received: Nov 14/14 L6T 4V1 Analysis Method(s): Direct Microscopic Examination Date Analyzed: Nov 19/14 Date Reported: Nov 19/14 Analyst: Weizhong Liu, Ph.D., Mycologist Approved By: Fajun Chen, Ph.D., Principal Mycologist

Client’s Sample

ID

Lab Sample

No.

Date Sampled

Description/Location Mould Identified, in Rank Order Mould Growth

TL1 229353 Nov 14/14 Mezzanine level – meeting rm

Acremonium Penicillium

Abundant

Note: 1. Mould growth is subjectively assessed with description terms sparse, moderate and abundant. 2. The presence of spores (lacking other fungal structures associated) is assessed as following: a few spores (< 10 spores average per microscopic field at 400X), some spores (10 - 100 spores average per microscopic field at 400X), many spores (> 100 spores average per microscopic field at 400X). 3. The presence of a few spores generally represents settled spores on the surface of the sample rather than indicating mould growth. 4. The results are only related to the samples analyzed.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Appendix B – Identified Asbestos Location and Quantity Table

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Location Type of ACM Sample

# Asbestos Content

Approx. Quantity

Hazard Ranking

Type of Removal as per O.

Reg. 278/05

Hallway

Suspended Ceiling Tile –

Random medium fissures, holes and pinholes

BS4.1 2% Amosite 300 ft2

2 Type 2

Basement Crawlspace

Vinyl floor tile debris

BS7.1 2%

Chrysotile <50 ft

2 2 Type 1

Main Entrance Porch Columns Transite -- Assumed 30 ft 1 Type1

Note:

1. Type of removal listed above shall be based on the quantity and method of removal as per O. Reg. 278/05.

2. The ACM quantities include materials within accessible areas only. Asbestos-containing materials may be present within the bulkheads, behind walls, above concealed or plaster ceilings or underneath multiple layers of flooring.

3. The Consultant or Client will not be held responsible for, or pay any claim which may result, by reason of, any variation between the approximate quantities and the actual quantities of work done. Contractor to verify the quantities and materials to be removed during the pre-bid Site walkthrough or prior to commence with the abatement work.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Appendix C – Photographs

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Photograph No. 1: Asbestos-containing suspended ceiling tile (24”x48” – random medium

fissures, holes and pinholes)

Photograph No. 2: Asbestos-containing vinyl floor tile debris inside the basement crawlspace.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Photograph No.3: Suspect asbestos-containing cement columns (transite columns) supporting the entrance portico.

Photograph No.4: Sealed-in lead is present in emergency light batteries throughout the subject building.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Photograph No.5: View of Non-PCB’s ballast present in light fixtures within the subject building.

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Appendix D – Hazard Ranking and Decision Tree

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

CLASSIFICATION FOR ASBESTOS HAZARD POTENTIAL (DECISION TREE DISPLAY)

ACM CONDITION

DAMAGED INTACT

POTENTIAL FOR DISTURBANCE

HIGH RISK

(REMOVE/REPAIR)

SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL FOR LOW POTENTIAL POTENTIAL FOR DISTURBANCE FOR DISTURBANCE DISTURBANCE

MODERATE RISK LOW RISK

(MAY REMAIN IN PLACE IF NO RENOVATIONS/DEMOLITION

HAZARD

RANK # 1

HAZARD

RANK # 2

HAZARD

RANK # 3

HAZARD

RANK # 4

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

Appendix E – Drawings

X

BS2.7

X

BS2.5-2.6

X

BS4.2-4.3

X

BS4.1

X

BS1.4

X

BS3.2-3.3

X

BS3.1

XPB-4

X

PB-2

X

PB-1

X

AOC2

X

AOC1

AOC4

X

AOC3

TITLE AND LOCATION:

SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN

GROUND / MAIN FLOOR

DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY

DORIC PICKERING MASONIC LODGE

457 KINGSTON ROAD WEST

AJAX, ONTARIO

DWN.:PROJECT NO.:

CK:SCALE:

FIG. NO.:DATE:

t: +1.905.793.9800 | f: +1.905.793.0641

1595 Clark Boulevard

Brampton, ON L6T 4V1

Canada

www.exp.com

exp Services Inc.

BUILDINGS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT ENERGY

INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINABILITY

BRM-00212250-B0

NTS

NOVEMBER 2014

BS

MA

1

LEGEND:

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE LOCATION

LEAD SAMPLE LOCATION

MOULD AIR SAMPLE LOCATION

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING SUSPENDED

CEILING TILES

X

BS##

X

PB##

NOTE: DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE REPORT

X

AOC#

X:\D

RA

WIN

GS

\2

12

00

0\2

12

25

0\2

12

25

0B

\D

SS

\N

ov 2

5th

2

01

4\B

RM

-0

02

12

25

0-B

0.d

wg

, 1

1/2

5/2

01

4 1

1:0

9:4

6 A

M

MEZZANINE

MEZZANINE

X

PB-3

X

BS1.1-1.3

X

BS5.1

X

BS5.2-5.3

X

BS2.1-2.2

X

BS2.3-2.4

X

TL1

TITLE AND LOCATION:


MEZZANINE AND ATTIC SPACE




AJAX, ONTARIO

DWN.:PROJECT NO.:

CK:SCALE:

FIG. NO.:DATE:

t: +1.905.793.9800 | f: +1.905.793.0641



Canada

www.exp.com

exp Services Inc.



BRM-00212250-B0

NTS

NOVEMBER 2014

BS

MA

2

LEGEND:



LEAD SAMPLE LOCATION

MOULD TAPE-LIFT SAMPLE LOCATION

CONFIRMED MOULD GROWTH

X

BS##

X

PB##

X

TL##

X:\D

RA

WIN

GS

\2

12

00

0\2

12

25

0\2

12

25

0B

\D

SS

\N

ov 2

5th

2

01

4\B

RM

-0

02

12

25

0-B

0.d

wg

, 1

1/2

5/2

01

4 1

1:1

2:1

3 A

M

X

BS1.7

X

BS1.5-1.6

X

BS7.1-7.3

X

BS6.1-6.3

TITLE AND LOCATION:


CRAWLSPACE




AJAX, ONTARIO

DWN.:PROJECT NO.:

CK:SCALE:

FIG. NO.:DATE:

t: +1.905.793.9800 | f: +1.905.793.0641



Canada

www.exp.com

exp Services Inc.



BRM-00212250-B0

NTS

NOVEMBER 2014

BS

MA

3

LEGEND:

AREA WITH LIMITED ACCESS. VISUAL

ASSESSMENT ONLY


ASBESTOS-CONTAINING VINYL FLOOR

TILE DEBRIS

X

BS##


X:\D

RA

WIN

GS

\2

12

00

0\2

12

25

0\2

12

25

0B

\D

SS

\N

ov 2

8th

2

01

4\B

RM

-0

02

12

25

0-B

0.d

wg

, 1

1/2

8/2

01

4 1

2:1

6:5

4 P

M

exp Services Inc.


BRM-00212250-B0 December 2, 2014

List of Distribution

Report Distributed To:

Ms. Christy Chrus

Town of Ajax

65 Hardwood Ave. S.

Ajax, ON L1S 2H9 via e-mail: [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Documents

Town of · PDF fileTown of Ajax Designated ... Final Project Name Doric Pickering Masonic Lodge 457 Kingston Road West, Ajax, Ontario Project Number BRM-00212250-B0