TRAFFIC SIGNAL STUDY - Laredo, · PDF fileAny available traffic volume, turning movement, ... measures) within and surrounding the study area that affect traffic patterns and intersection

  • Upload
    vutram

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study October 2008

    Final Report

    Prepared for:

    In Cooperation With:

    Prepared by:

    Firm Registration No. F-2214

    September 2010 E0350601

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study Laredo MPO (Laredo Urban Transportation Study)

  • McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study October 2008

    - 2 -

    We Make A Difference

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study September 2010 Laredo Urban Transportation Study (LUTS)

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study

    Laredo, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INDEX OF FIGURES 4 INDEX OF TABLES 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 9 3.0 PRE-STUDY 10 3.1 Study Corridor Access Identification 10 3.2 Traffic Generator and Corridor Identification 10 3.3 Stakeholder/Public Outreach Meeting 12 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 20 4.1 Traffic Data and Corridor Data 20 4.2 Review and Analysis of Existing Traffic Volumes 20 4.3 Traffic Congestion Impacts on Economy, Commerce, and

    Environment 20

    5.0 FUTURE PROJECTIONS 32 5.1 Current and Future Construction Projects 32 5.2 Expansion Plans by Significant Traffic Generators 36 5.3 Projected Traffic Volumes 41 5.3.1 2035 No-Build Scenario 41 5.3.2 2035 Build Scenario 41 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

  • McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study October 2008

    - 3 -

    We Make A Difference

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study September 2010 Laredo Urban Transportation Study (LUTS)

    Page 6.0 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 46 6.1 Analysis of Traffic Conditions 47 6.2 Analysis Results Existing Conditions 48 6.3 Corridor Improvements 54 6.3.1 Traffic Signal Improvements 54 6.3.2 Intersection Geometric Improvements 55 6.3.3 Access Management 57 6.3.4 One-Way Couplets 70 6.3.5 Parallel Relief Routes 70 6.3.6 Additional Capacity 71 6.4 Analysis Results Proposed Improvements 74 6.5 Transit Operations 79 6.6 Costs & Benefits of Recommended Improvements 82 6.7 Implementation Plan 86 7.0 CONCLUSION 88 7.1 Traffic Signal Optimization 88 7.2 Access Management 89 7.3 Alternative Parallel Traffic Routes 92 7.4 One-Way Side Street Pairing 93 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 96 8.1 Traffic Signal Optimization 96 8.2 Access Management 96 8.3 Alternative Traffic Routes Intersection Improvements 96 8.4 One-Way Street Pairing 97 8.5 Implementation Plan 97 8.6 Other Recommendation 98

  • McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study October 2008

    - 4 -

    We Make A Difference

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study September 2010 Laredo Urban Transportation Study (LUTS)

    INDEX OF FIGURES Title Page Figure 3.1 Significant Traffic Generators 11 Figure 4.1 Level of Service Concept 21 Figure 4.2 Potential Neighborhood Diversion Routes 27 Figure 4.3 CO Emissions Characteristics 28 Figure 4.4 VOC and NOx Emissions Characteristics 29 Figure 5.1 Traffic Analysis Zones McPherson Road Corridor 33 Figure 5.2 2035 MTP Projects McPherson Road Corridor 34 Figure 5.3 Future MTP Street Construction Projects 35 Figure 5.4 Special Generators McPherson Road Corridor 37 Figure 5.5 Population and Employment Data by TAZ 2008 and 2035 38 Figure 5.6 Employment Change (Percent) 2008-2035 39 Figure 5.7 Employment Change (No. of Employees) 2008-2035 40 Figure 5.8 2008 Volumes and Level of Service 43 Figure 5.9 2035 Volumes and Level of Service (No Build) 44 Figure 5.10 2035 Volumes and Level of Service (Build) 45 Figure 6.1 Flexible Median Delineator on McPherson Road at Andrew Lane 59 Figure 6.2 Medians Between Loop 20 and Monarch Drive 61 Figure 6.3 Medians at San Isidro Parkway 62 Figure 6.4 Medians at Sterling and Tiara Trail 63 Figure 6.5 Medians at International Boulevard 64 Figure 6.6 Medians at University/Fenwick and Jacaman 65 Figure 6.7 Medians at Calle del Norte and Gale Street 66 Figure 6.8 El Metro Transit Bus Headways 80 Figure 6.9 McPherson Road El Metro Routes 81

  • McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study October 2008

    - 5 -

    We Make A Difference

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study September 2010 Laredo Urban Transportation Study (LUTS)

    INDEX OF TABLES Title Page

    Table 4.1 Mobility Data, Laredo, Texas 2000-2005 24

    Table 4-2 2005 Mobility Data for Laredo and Other Regions Analyzed 25

    Table 6-1 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections

    48

    Table 6-2 Analysis Summary for McPherson Rod 2008 Existing Conditions 49

    Table 6-3 Existing Travel Times 53

    Table 6-4 Lengths of Median Turn Lanes from Table 3-13 of TxDOT Roadway Design Manual

    60

    Table 6-5 TxDOT Driveway Spacing Requirements 67

    Table 6-6 TxDOT Commercial Driveway Design Criteria 68

    Table 6-7 Potential Improvements for Intersections along McPherson Road 73

    Table 6-8 Analysis Summary for McPherson Road Proposed Improvements 74

    Table 6-9 Proposed Travel Times 78

    Table 6-10 Travel Time Along McPherson Road, Saunders Loop 20 82

    Table 6-11 Air Pollutants 82

    Table 6-12 Cost of Police Reported Crashes 85

    Table 6-13 Intersection Median Costs and Benefits 86

    Table 7-1 Intersection Delay/Level of Service Two-Way Street Operation Gale Street & Calle del Norte

    94

    Table 7-2 Intersection Delay/Level of Service One-Way Street Operation Gale Street & Calle del Norte

    94

  • McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study October 2008

    - 6 -

    We Make A Difference

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study September 2010 Laredo Urban Transportation Study (LUTS)

    1.0 INTRODUCTION As defined by the Laredo Urban Transportation Study (LUTS), the objective of this study is to evaluate existing and projected traffic conditions on McPherson Road between Loop 20 and US Highway 59 (Saunders Street) to develop recommendations for mobility improvements, which may include, but would not be limited to the following: Traffic Signal System Synchronization

    Access Management (Reduce Conflict Points)

    Alternative Parallel Traffic Routes

    One-Way Side Street Pairing The corridor evaluation included traffic operations, roadway function, trip projections, crash analysis, and needs along the McPherson Road study corridor. The study includes recommendations such as capital improvements, cost-benefit ratios, an implementation plan with short and long-term strategies, cost estimates, and o rder of implementation for infrastructure improvements. The Scope of Work for the study was as follows: SCOPE OF WORK Task I: Project Management Sub-task 1.1 Conduct a project kick-off meeting to identify project goals and objectives, discuss the

    proposed scope of work, review proposed project schedule, define study limits, and identify key stakeholders.

    Sub-task 1.2 Coordinate tasks with sub-consultants and determine critical paths. Sub-task 1.3 Prepare monthly progress reports and invoices. Deliverable Revised scope of work and project schedule as developed by the study team and the

    Technical Committee. Task II: Pre-Study Sub-task 2.1 Identify (on a map) vehicular access routes to the study area, signalized intersections, and all streets. Sub-task 2.2 Identify significant traffic generators along McPherson Road and within identified corridors

    and their related access points on a GIS map. Sub-task 2.3 Conduct a stakeholder / public outreach meeting to identify public perceived corridor deficiencies. Sub-task 2.4 Submit the map to the Technical Committee to review relevance and completeness as well as to discuss objectives and methodologies of the other phases Deliverable Prepare a Phase I Technical Memorandum and submit to the Technical Committee. LUTS to provide: a. All available GIS geo database maps b. All pertinent past studies and data

  • McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study October 2008

    - 7 -

    We Make A Difference

    McPherson Road Mobility and Capacity Study September 2010 Laredo Urban Transportation Study (LUTS)

    Task III: Existing Conditions Sub-task 3.1 Obtain and/or collect traffic data (while school is in session) to include intersection

    geometry, average daily traffic volume, intersection turning movements, vehicle classification, and travel time runs.

    Sub-task 3.2 Review and analyze current vehicular traffic volumes and travel patterns. Sub-task 3.3 Determine the adverse impact that congestion has on area residents, the natural environment, the local economy and the movement of commerce through and within Laredo. Deliverable Prepare a Phase II Technical Memorandum and present Phases I and II to the Technical Committee. LUTS to provide: a. Any available traffic volume, turning movement, and classification data

    b. Traffic signal timings for all signalized intersections along McPherson Road c. Crash data records for McPherson Road

    Phase IV: Future Projections Subtask 4.1 Identify current and future street construction projects (including access management

    measures) within and surrounding the study area that affect traffic patterns and intersection movements along McPherson Road (e.g., widening of McPherson Road near United High School, extension of Bartlett Ave, Springfield Ave, Shiloh Dr, etc.).

    Sub-task 4.2 Identify expansion plans by significant traffic generators. Sub-task 4.3 Project future vehicular traffic volumes and identify potential locations for conflict. Sub-task 4.4 Prepare a map depicting the projected construction and land development. Deliverable Prepare a Phase III T