Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CMS Web Interface Kick-Off Webinar
December 11, 2019
All right. Hi, everybody and thank you for joining today's CMS Web Interface
kick Off. During this webinar CMS will provide an overview of 2019 CMS Web
Interface quality reporting for MIPS Groups and ACOs. After the webinar, CMS
will take as many questions as time allows. So, now, I'll turn it over to
Lisa Marie Gomez from CMS to begin.
Thank you and welcome everyone, and thank you for joining us today, as ACOs,
MIPS Groups, and Virtual Groups prepare to report quality data via the Web Interface. Again, my name is Lisa Marie Gomez and I'm with CMS. I'm a subject
matter expert regarding the Web Interface. Joining me on the call today are
other CMS subject matter experts and contractors who will share helpful
information regarding quality data reporting through the Web Interface. And we'll also answer any questions during the question and answer session after
today's presentation. Today's call is focused on quality reporting. You can
contact the Quality Payment Program Service Center with any other questions
regarding Promoting Interoperability, Improvement activities, MIPS or other
Quality reporting questions that you may have, that may not be covered in
today's presentation. Next slide please.
So, before we get -- begin this presentation, we just want to note that the
information presented in today's presentation is current at the time of its
publication. The Medicare policy changes frequently, so, we encourage you to
review and use the resource documents and links that are provided throughout
the presentation. And please stay tuned for any communication from the
Quality Payment Program, Medicare Shared Savings Program, or Next Generation
ACO model regarding any updated information. Next slide please.
So, today we want to go over just a few announcements. So, the resources
listed on this slide have been posted to the Quality Payment Program Resource
Library and Webinar Library. You can access the CMS Web Interface User Guide,
FAQs, Excel Template, Data Dictionary, Fact Sheet, and the CMS Web Interface
Demonstration webinar, the recording, the presentation slide, and the
transcript. Next slide please.
So, we just want to highlight a few key dates. So, the submission period for
the CMS Web Interface will align with other submission types for the 2019
Performance Year which opens on January 2nd, 2020 and it closes promptly at
8:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time on March 31st, 2020. Please note that there is
not a test period for the CMS Web Interface as the submission period is now
longer and spans a three-month timeframe, So, you will have a longer period
to submit your data as compared to previous years. So, once the submission
period closes, the CMS Web Interface will automatically accept your
submission. As a reminder, the CMS Web Interface is accessible using the
“Sign In” link on the Quality Payment Program website. Next slide please.
We want to highlight a new feature for program year 2019 which is
specifically the Other CMS Approved Reason skip requests which must be
submitted through the CMS Web Interface. So, once the submission period opens
on January 2nd, 2020, we encourage you to submit any skip requests that you
may have early in the submission period in order for us to ensure that we're
able to review and process all skip requests that are submitted. So, again we
want to make sure that you're able to submit those all in advance so we can
1
process through all of the skip requests that are submitted and get them
completed before the submission period closes. As a reminder, the 2019 CMS
Web Interface Application Programing Interface, also known as the API, is
available all year for testing in the developer preview environment. For more
information you can -- it can be found using the link provided on this slide.
Next slide please.
So, now, we want to just go over upcoming support calls that we have starting
in January of 2019. So, all weekly support calls listed below will be held on
Wednesdays from 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm Eastern Standard Time. Our first call will
be held on Wednesday, January 15th, 2020, and the topics for that support
call will include PREV-10, reporting within the CMS Web Interface, Assignment
and Sampling FAQs, frequently asked measure questions covering the following
measures: DM-2, HTN-2 and PREV-7. Additional topics maybe added prior to the
support call. Next slide please.
So, this next section we will cover the CMS Web Interface reporting
requirements. Next slide please.
So, for the reporting requirements, all organizations, regardless of size,
are required to confirm, and complete an accurate report on a minimum of 248
consecutively ranked Medicare patients for each measure. If you skip a
patient, they will be replaced with the next consecutively ranked beneficiary
until a total of 248 are reached. If the pool of eligible sampled patients is
less than 248, then your organization is required to report on all sampled
patients. Complete reporting of all 10 CMS Web Interface quality measures
will meet requirements for the Quality performance category for the 2019
performance year. MIPS groups, virtual groups, and eligible clinicians
participating in an ACO must meet MIPS reporting requirements for all
performance categories to avoid the 2021 MIPS negative payment adjustment.
Next slide please.
ACOs that fail to report all measures will not meet the Quality performance
standard and will be ineligible to share in savings, if earned. For the
Shared Savings Program ACOs participating under two-sided risk tracks,
failure to meet the Quality performance standard will result in the ACO owing
the maximum in losses, if they owe losses. MIPS eligible clinicians who are
scored under the MIPS APM scoring standard and have reassigned billing rights
to the Shared Savings Program ACO participant TIN in a Shared Savings Program
ACO that fails to satisfactorily report the CMS Web Interface measures for
ACOs will get a MIPS Quality performance score of zero unless they report
separately for the ACO, either as a group or a solo practitioner TIN. So,
right now I'm going to turn the presentation over to Chris Reinartz. Chris?
Thanks Lisa Marie. Okay. So, I'm going to give a quick overview of how you
would gain access to log on to QPP and connect to the Web Interface
application. HARP is our Identity Management System. Next slide please.
So, as in years past, anyone needing access to the CMS Web application is
going to need a HARP user ID and password. So, to create a HARP account you
would log on to QPP and click “Sign in.” If at this point you already have a user ID and password, you would just be able to enter those and you'd have
access to the system. If you don't already have your HARP credentials, then
you're going to need to click on “Register.” Once you've done that you provide your legal name, your date of birth, your address, and your Social
2
Security Number. And then you'd go through this one-time process to set up
your user ID and password. Part of the process is going to be an identity
proofing exercise where we'll lead you through a series of multiple-choice
questions where you'd provide some personal information or confirm some
personal information and this is a Federal security requirement applicable to
our Quality Payment Program. Next slide please.
So, once you have your username and password, you would also set up a multi-
factor authentication where you're just going to select whether or not you
want to receive a text or email or a phone call to give you a confirmation
code that you would use each time you log into the system. And again, that's
just a one-time process. So, this should give you the ability to log on to
QPP and from there you have to set up any of the organizations which you were
needing to access the Web Interface for, whether that be a ACO or a group
practice or virtual group.
So, this would take you to a pretty simple workflow. Once you get into QPP,
you click on the “Connect to an Organization” link in the Manage User tab or Manage Access tab, and that's going to take you to the workflow that would
lead you to selecting your organization's name against our database, and then
you would select the type of role you would need. And basically we have two
separate roles, you're either going to enroll as a Security Official or
you're going to enroll as a staff user. So, if you're the first one setting
up the organization you -- you're mandated to become a security official. The
difference between the two roles is the staff user has “Read and Submit Data
Access.” The Security Official has both “Read and Submit Data Access” as well as an additional functionality where they can approve subsequent user
requests. You can have multiple Security Officials for your organization,
that's up to you how you want to handle that.
All of this is handled or laid out in a lot more detail than what I've
provided here and you can find that on our Resource Library, on our QPP site
and specifically you're looking for the Quality Payment Program Access User
Guide. And if you have any problems during the setup of your user credentials
you can contact our service center at the telephone number listed on this
slide or the web address listed on this slide. That concludes my portion of
the demonstration. I'm going to turn this over to Ozlem and she's going to
provide a little more background on some of the system functionality.
Okay. Good afternoon everyone. I'm Ozlem Tasel. I would like to show you the
steps you will need to follow to enter the CMS Web Interface through QPP. The
orange arrows on these images are to direct your attention to the areas that
you'll need to click on or enter data. But to access the CMS Web Interface,
you're going to have to first sign in to QPP. You'll click on the Sign In on
the Quality Payment Program screen. Next slide please.
You will need to next -- need to -- you will need to enter your user ID and
password. Check the Statement of Truth checkbox to agree and then click the
Sign In button. Next slide.
QPP requires two-factor authentication to sign in. A verification code will
be sent to your selected method of two-factor authentication. You will have
to enter that code here, then click the Verify button. Next slide.
3
After signing into QPP, you can either click the Eligibility and Reporting
link on the left navigation menu or click the Start Reporting button on the
page. Next slide.
The following steps to navigate to the CMS Web Interface is slightly
different for ACOs, groups, and virtual groups. First, I'll show you the
navigation for ACOs. If you're an ACO, when you reach the Eligibility and
Reporting page, you will see a page that looks like this. Above the
Eligibility and Reporting page title, Performance Year 2019 will be selected
by default. Under the APM Entities tab, there will be a list of APM entities
that your account is associated with. Next to each entity on the list, you
will have a Start Reporting button. Once you click on the Start Reporting
button, you will enter the CMS Web Interface for the selected APM entity or
ACO. Next slide.
And here, you see the landing page for the CMS Web Interface. On the left-
hand side, there's a navigation menu where you can click to navigate to View
Progress, Report Data, View Reports, Manage Clinics, Manage Providers, and
Frequently Asked Questions. On the right-hand side, there's a Milestone
Timeline that helps you understand where you are during the submission
period. Next slide.
If you're a MIPS group then you will have a few extra steps. Next slide.
On the Eligibility and Reporting page, select the Practices tab to see a list
of practices your account is associated with. Next to each practice name, you
will see the Report As Group button. Click on the Report As Group button.
Next slide.
You will be navigated to the Reporting Overview page. In the Quality section
of this page, click on the CMS Web Interface link to access the system. Next
slide.
And here you see the same CMS Web Interface landing page that we saw for
ACOs. It has the same left navigation, the same Milestone Timeline and the
same options on the page. Next slide.
Lastly, if you're a virtual group, you will need to take the following steps
to access the CMS Web Interface. Next slide.
Again, on the Eligibility and Reporting page, you would select the Virtual
Groups tab to see a list of virtual groups your account is associated with.
Next to the Virtual group name, you will see the Start Reporting button.
Click on the spot -- Start Reporting button. Next slide.
You will be navigated to the Reporting Overview page. In the Quality section
of this page, click on the CMS Web Interface link to access the CMS Web
Interface application. Next slide.
And here you see the same CMS Web Interface landing page again that we saw
for ACOs and Groups. Again, the same left-hand navigation, the same Milestone
Timeline, and the same options available on the page. Next slide.
CMS Web Interface Submission Methods. Next slide please.
4
There are three ways you may submit data for CMS Web Interface reporting:
Manual Data Entry via the User Interface; MS Excel File Upload; and CMS Web
Interface API Application Programming Interface. These methods can be used in
any combination to complete your reporting. You can upload data using the
Excel File Uploads functionality and then in the User Interface, select the
update beneficiaries manually through the data entry pages. Similarly, you
can submit data via Web Interface API and then do an Excel File Upload or use
the Data Entry pages. The submission of data can be completed in any
combination of these methods. Next slide.
Other CMS Approved Reason Skip Request Process.
This year, Other CMS Approved skip requests can only be submitted manually
through the CMS Web Interface. Now, I'd like to show you the steps you'll
need to follow to submit a skip request. Next slide. Oh, actually, if you can
stay on this slide please. Once you identify a patient to request a skip for
Other CMS Approved Reason, you will first need to confirm the patient for
sample by selecting Yes for, “Can you locate the patient's medical records
and is this patient qualified for the sample” question. Once you've selected Yes… next slide please.
You will scroll down to the appropriate measure and under, “Is the patient
qualified for this measure?” question, click on the No - Request Other CMS
Approved Reason link. Next Slide.
Clicking on that link will bring up the skip request model. In this model,
submitter information as well as the measure name and patient rank will be
automatically filled in for you. In order to complete your request, you will
need to enter your e-mail address and a description of why the patient is not
qualified for this measure. Once all the required information is entered, you
can click Request CMS Approval button to submit your request. Next slide.
Upon submitting the request, skip request confirmation dialogue will appear.
Click on Dismiss link to close the confirmation dialogue. Next slide.
Here you see that the patient is in incomplete status and a skip request was
submitted. You can click on View Case Details link to pull up the details on
this request. Next slide.
In addition to the details submitted for the request, you can click on “Show
Case History” link to see further details on this request. While the case is in review, the patient will stay in incomplete status. If the request is
approved, the patient will be automatically marked as Skipped and Completed.
If the request is denied, the case status will be marked as Denied and the
patient will stay in incomplete status. The patient will need to be completed
in order to complete your submission for this measure. Next slide.
Now I'm going to pass it off to Kara.
Thank you and good afternoon. This is Kara Sokol, and I will provide an
overview of assignment and sampling. Next slide.
The CMS Web Interface allows groups, virtual groups, and ACOs to report data
on a pre-determined population of patients. There are several steps completed
in order to determine this population of patients.
5
First, beneficiaries are assigned to organizations based on current program
rule. For ACOs, CMS will use beneficiaries assigned using the ACO assignment
and alignment methodology. For groups and virtual groups, beneficiaries will
be assigned using the MIPS assignment methodology.
In the next step, assigned beneficiaries are assessed for their quality
reporting eligibility including measure specific denominator eligibility.
Beneficiaries who meet the following criteria will be excluded from quality
measurement eligibility. Beneficiaries with fewer than two eligible services
within the organization during the performance year will be excluded.
Beneficiaries with only part-year eligibility in Medicare Fee-For-Service
Part A and Part B will be excluded. Beneficiaries who are in hospice care,
who are deceased, or who did not reside in the United States will also be
excluded. For beneficiaries who are identified as eligible for quality
measurement, we determine if they are eligible for any of the specific
quality measures based on the denominator criteria as outlined in the 2019
CMS Web Interface Measures Specifications and supporting documents.
In the last step, eligible beneficiaries are randomly sampled into applicable
measures and loaded into the CMS Web Interface for quality reporting. Each
measure will have a sample size of 616 beneficiaries with the exception of
PREV-13, the statin therapy measure, which has a larger sample of 750. As
previously described, each organization is required to confirm and complete
data on 248 beneficiaries for each measure in order of rank with skip
beneficiaries replaced by the next in rank. If there are fewer than 248
eligible samples for a measure, the organization must report on 100% of those
included in the sample.
For more details on the sampling process including the visit codes used to
identify eligibility, please refer to the 2019 CMS Web Interface Sampling
Methodology document available online from the QPP Resource Library. We will
now move on to the measures overview. Next slide.
Hi. Angela Stevenson, can you please make sure your phone isn’t on mute?
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS team. So, I will go ahead and speak through
these slides. So, what is showing on slide 42 is a list of the 2019 CMS Web
Interface Supporting Documents that are available on the Quality Payment
Program Resource Library. This includes the 2019 Measures List,. the
Narrative Measures Specifications and Performance Calculation Flows, the
Coding Documents, as well as the Release Notes that outline changes from 2018
to 2019. Next slide, please.
This slide shows the measures that were retired in 2019 including CARE-1, DM-
7, IVD-2, PREV-8, and PREV-9. Next slide, please.
This slide shows the list of 2019 Web Interface Measures available for
reporting during this submission period. And just to remind you that you must
submit data on all 10 Web Interface Measures for 2019. Next slide, please.
This slide outlines the 2019 Web Interface Measures with Substantive Changes.
These changes were covered in the Final Rule legislation. These measures
include MH-1 and PREV-10. We also have included Measures with Guidance
Clarification. These are updates that we have either received from CMS or the
6
measure steward. And these measures include PREV-7 and PREV-12. Again, for
any – for full detailed listing of all changes to the 2019 Web Interface specifications, we would like to refer you to the 2019 CMS Web Interface
Release Notes. There are release notes for the narrative documents as well as
the coding documents. Next slide, please.
This slide outlines the Substantive Changes for MH-1. These changes include
an updated denominator, so the patient population now includes adolescent
patients from 12 to 17 years of age. It includes the PHQ-9M and the
Denominator Identification Period was updated from 11/01/2017 to 10/31/2018.
There's also updated numerator guidance expanding the measure assessment
period for 12 months plus or minus 60 days. And then additional denominator
exclusions were added. This includes patients with a diagnosis of
schizophrenia or psychotic disorder and patients with a pervasive
developmental disorder. Next slide, please.
This slide also outlines the denominator guidance that was updated. Just some
wording changes within the measure specification. And, additionally,
outlining that two rates will be reported, one for adolescent patients 12 to
17 years of age, and adult patients age 18 years and older. Next slide,
please.
This slide covers MH-1 frequently asked questions. Question one is, “Is the
PHQ-9M the same as the PHQ-9A for adolescents?” The answer is no. PHQ-9M is approved by the PHQ-9 developer and is contained within the Guidelines for
Adolescent Depression in Primary Care toolkit and the web link can be found
on the slide. The tool is found on page 63 of the toolkit. Question two: “Now
that the age range is 12 and-- 12 to 17 and 18 years and older, can we use
the PHQ-9 for all of our patients?” The answer is yes, you may use either of the PHQ-9 or PHQ-9M. Providers may elect to use either tool to meet the
intent of MH-1. Next slide, please.
This slide update-- excuse me, provides updates and substantive changes to
PREV-10. So, included here is-- excuse me, additional denominator guidance,
additional numerator guidance stating that cessation can be performed by
another healthcare provider, and the screening and cessation intervention do
not need to be performed by the same provider or clinician. The most recent
update is per the 2020 Final Rule. The requirement stating to use the
cessation intervention must occur during or after the most recent tobacco
user status is documented was removed. So, this update clarifies that
screening for tobacco use and cessation intervention do not have to occur on
the same encounter, both must occur during the 24-month look-back period.
Next slide, please.
This slide will cover some PREV-10 frequently asked questions. Number one:
“Is PREV-10 pay-for-reporting for 2019?” So, due to the mid-year change to the measure specification, CMS is reclassifying the measure as "pay-for-
reporting" in the Medicare Shared Savings Program. And the measure will be
excluded from MIPS scoring-- excuse me, provided it met with the date
completeness requirement and the measure was reported through the CMS Web
Interface. Number two: “Do we need documentation that we screened for both
smoking and smokeless tobacco to meet the screening portion of the measure?” No. For the measure steward, you did not need to document the patient was
screened for both smoking and smokeless tobacco for 2019 reporting. Question
three: “Can we just state the status as smoker, non-smoker, former smoker, et
7
cetera to pass the measure or must it read ‘Tobacco’ status?” The answer is yes. A documented status for any type of tobacco use, for example, non-
smoker, smoker, or uses smokeless tobacco, meets the screening component of
the numerator. Next slide, please.
This slide will cover PREV-7 updated guidance. So, these are changes to the
guidance within the measure specification not considered substantive. So, for
this measure, the numerator guidance was updated that influenza during the
flu season or report previous receipt may not be completed during a
telehealth-- may or may not be completed during a telehealth encounter. So,
this change just intends to clarify that a screening where patient reports
previous receipt of influenza can be completed during a telehealth encounter.
Next slide, please.
Additional guidance updates include PREV-12. So, the initial population was
updated to all patients 12 years and older at the beginning of the
measurement period. Definitions were also updated for the tools listed on the
slide. Next slide, please.
Additional guidance updates include added examples of a Follow-Up Plan such
additional evaluation or assessment, completion of a Suicide Risk Assessment,
referral to a practitioner or program for further evaluation for depression,
and other interventions designed to treat depression such as psychotherapy,
pharmacological interventions, or additional treatment options. Next slide.
Here, we have a few PREV-12 frequently asked questions. Number one: “Does a
PHQ-2 or PHQ-9 score of a zero count if there's no documentation of the
results?” The answer is no. Per page 10 of the measure specifications, the results must be reviewed and verified and documented by the eligible
professional in the medical record on the date of the encounter to meet the
screening portion of the measure.
Number two: “If a patient answered ‘no’ to both PHQ-2 Q-- PHQ-2 questions but
there is no documented score, is this acceptable as documentation of a
negative screen?” No. Per page 10 of the measure specifications, the results must be reviewed and documented by the eligible professional in the medical
record on the date of the eligible encounter to meet the screening portion of
the measure.
And number three: “If the PHQ-9 or PHQ-2 questions are built in to the EMR
but are not labeled with the name of the screening tool, is this
documentation acceptable?” The answer is no. Per page six of the measure specification, the name of the age appropriate standardized depression
screening tool must be utilized and documented in the medical record. Next
slide, please.
This brings us to the end of our measures overview. I'll now hand things back
to Lisa Marie. Thank you.
Thanks, Kayte. So, the next few slides, we will continue to outline available
CMS Web Interface resources. Next slide, please.
The items currently listed on this slide are currently available on the
Quality Payment Program Resource Library. We'll continue to communicate any
future postings and upcoming Support Calls. The Help and Support page at
8
qpp.cms.gov contain links to materials such as videos, webinars, and online
courses, as well as other items to help with reporting and development. Next
slide, please.
This slide contains links to resources available for the Medicare Shared
Savings Program ACO and for the Next Generation ACO Model. So, please check
those links or on other information for information linked to those programs.
Next slide, please.
If you need additional assistance, please refer to the contact information
listed on this slide. Again, contact help relates to the Quality Payment
Program, the Medicare Shared Savings Program for ACOs, and the Next
Generation ACO Model. Now, I'm going to turn the presentation over to Lauren
Keefer.
Great. Thank you. All right. Just a reminder you that if you'd like to help
us improve the Quality Payment Program, we are always looking for
participants to collaborate with us and provide feedback. So, please contact
the QPP Research Teams for any of our Human-Centered Design efforts. You can
do that by emailing [email protected]. Okay.
And that brings up to the question and answer session of our webinar. Just as
a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question over the phone line, please raise
your hand using the hand icon in Go To and we will unmute your line. We will
go ahead and say your name just to let you know and then you can begin to ask
your question. Otherwise, you can always submit a question to the Questions
tab on your screen and we will read it out loud. We will address as many
questions as time allows but we do just want to go ahead and let everybody
know that during this webinar, we will not be taking questions on PREV-12.
So, if you have any questions concerning PREV-12, please contact the QPP
Service Center at [email protected]. Okay. So, the first question brings us to
-- let me just bring it up. Okay. First question is, “What are the deadlines
for Web Interface and when will data be available?”
Hi, this is Lisa Marie. So, the timeframe to submit any data for Quality via
the Web Interface is from January 2nd, 2020 to May 31st, 2020*1. And the
deadline is 8:00 PM. So once the submission period closes at 8:00 PM,
whatever data and information you have been submitted to the Web Interface,
that data will automatically be accepted and that’s the information that will
be assessed and scored. And then information in regards to how well you did
or like the report -- well, actually the reports for the Web Interface in
terms of -- on like the data that you submitted and reported, those reports
are actually available in the Web Interface. So, when you're navigating it,
as Ozlem showed you on the left-hand side, there's a navigation panel, and
then that's where you're able to see, like, the reports relative to the
information that you submitted via the Web Interface.
Just to clarify, this is Sarah from the Shared Savings Program. The Web
Interface reporting closes on March the 31st, not May the 31st.
Oh, sorry, did I say May? Sorry. I thought I said March. Sorry.
1 The deadline is March 31st, 2020.
9
Great. Thank you. All right. Next question asks, “To get bonus points, can we
also submit electronic quality measures as well as the Web Interface?”
So, for bonus points relating to the Web Interface, so electronic upload of
your data using the API, using the Excel spreadsheet, those are ways in which
you're able to obtain bonus points. But if you report eCQMs, that's a
different means in terms of outside the Web Interface. But for the Web
Interface to obtain bonus points, it's, you know, doing the Excel upload,
it's, you know, using the API, using those means are ways to obtain bonus
points.
Okay. Great. Thank you. So, now we'll go to the phone line. We will go ahead
and see if Rhonda Johnson, we're going to go ahead and unmute your line, so
you may go ahead and ask your question.
All right. Moving back. Looking forward to next year’s Support Calls, can you
repeat the topics for the January 15th call please?
This is Lisa Marie. So, for the next support call on January 15th, 2020, the
topics that we will discuss will include PREV-10, reporting within the CMS
Web Interface, assigning and assembling FAQs, and frequently asked measure
questions covering the following measures: DM-2, HTN-2, and PREV-7. And there
may be other topics that we add prior to the support call but right now those
are the topics that we will be discussing on that call, on that support call.
Great. Thank you. All right. Your next question asks, they would like to get
clarification on PREV-10. “Can you please clarify that the cessation does not
have to be on or after the sedate -- sorry, tobacco user's data?”
A lot -- a lot of questions in the queue on this so I'll try to touch on
everybody's questions that are present within this slide deck. As Kayte
indicated back on slide 49 and she referenced the 2020 Final -- or QPP or
Quality Payment Program Final Rule, cessation no longer has to occur on or
after the most current screening for tobacco. You can go ahead and look
within the measurement year or the prior year to see if that cessation had
been provided to the patient. Thank you.
Okay. Great. Thanks. All right. We'll try the phone line again, so, Jason
Shropshire, you may go ahead and ask your question.
Hi, can you hear me?
Yup.
Hello?
Yeah.
Yeah. I want to clarify and make sure I got something correct because it's in
direct contradiction to what was told to us previously. So, the PREV-10
measure on the questions, since it's a measure question, it says you do not
have to ask smoking and smokeless. Well, previously, we were told you had to
do both. So, can you please clarify which is correct? Because that's a major
difference in the numerator.
10
Yeah. You're so ahead of the curve. It's also in our queue. So, I'm going to
try to cover the gamut here and by all means folks on the line if you still
have clarifications or -- I'm not quite touching on the question you had,
please feel free to go back into that queue and submit another question. But
the measure truly is only for tobacco products, so any reference to e-
cigarettes or vaping or illicit drugs, marijuana, in such case that is --
that's not covered under this particular measure. It truly just looks at the
products and you don't have to do both.
Okay. But that's not answering my -- so you're saying is -- it's in our EHR,
it says like there's a tab for smoking and a tab for smokeless as long as
they just -- the provider just addresses the smoking tab only, that will meet
the numerator requirement.
You got it, Jason. That's correct.
Okay. Great. All right. Next question asks, ”For an ACO, is it submission on
248 patients for each measure to be the grand total for the entire ACO or is
it 248 patients for each measure for each 10 in the ACO?”
Hi, this is Ozlem. I'll try to answer this question. Once you log in to the
Web Interface for your ACO and start reporting, you will be required to
report on 248 patients for each measure for the ACO. So, your reporting would
be for the ACO, not for each individual TIN under your ACO. Thank you.
Great. Thank you, Ozlem. All right. Going back to the phone line, Yvonne
Barillas, we're going to unmute your line so you may go ahead with your
question.
Thank you. It was already answered.
Perfect. All right. Next question asks, “Would a diagnosis of dementia be an
exclusion for both the MH and Depression Screening Measures?”
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS Team. So, for MH-1, no, dementia is not an
exclusion or exception for this particular measure. For PREV-12, dementia as
a standalone is not an exclusion, however, it could be considered if the
documentation is available that the patient was not screened due to their
diagnosis. Thank you.
Great. Thank you. All right. Next question is again on PREV-10. It asks,
“Within PREV-10, use of vaping and e-cigarettes is not a valid pass to
cessation. Does the use of the above vaping and e-cigarettes require a
cessation plan in place?”
So, since the -- thank you for the question. Since the PREV-10 only looks at
tobacco use, you -- and it doesn't look at e-cigarettes or vaping, you
wouldn't need a cessation plan for the measure in order to meet it, so no.
Okay. All right. Thank you. Back to the questions line, we have a question
from Linda Dodge. So, Linda Dodge, we have unmuted your line, you may go
ahead.
Can you hear me?
11
Yes, loud and clear.
Okay. In specific reference to chewing tobacco, that in our documentation is
not smokeless tobacco, does that count towards that measure? So, if you --
because we ask, "Do you smoke cigarettes? Do you chew tobacco?"
So, I'm looking at my team on this and we are trying to reach a quick
consensus, but, yeah, chewing tobacco would count since it's a tobacco
product. So, whenever you're doing that screening, it's important to look at
all routes that tobacco may be used to meet the intent of the measure. Does
that help? I'm going to take that as a yes. Thanks.
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. Next question asks, “Are the measure specs
final for Performance Year 2019?”
This is Lisa Marie. Yes, the measure specs that have been released for 2019
are the final specs.
All right. Thank you. All right. Next question from the phone line is from
Rajitha Kamshatti. So, Rajitha, you may go ahead and ask your question.
Rajitha Kamshatti, you can go ahead and ask your question. All right, never
mind. Next, we will go on to Anita Erwin. Anita Erwin, you may go ahead and
ask your question.
Hi, this is -- this question is again about the tobacco use screening and I'm
still trying to get some clarification on this. So, if we have a patient that
chews tobacco in real life, he chews tobacco, but when he comes in to -- for
-- to see his provider, if they only ask, "Do you smoke?" He's going to say,
"No." And then that's going to count that we've assessed his tobacco status,
and that will -- but we didn't ask about any other form of tobacco and he
really is a user and we've missed that. So, that doesn't make any sense to me
that that's going to be providing good care.
Yeah. This is a good question about the interaction and how the intent of the
measure sort of aligns or works within the flow of the interaction that you
have with the patient and the measure truly is intended to look at tobacco
use in all forms. And so, I know that the question can get tricky. I
understand interacting with the patients, they -- when you're -- depending on
how the question gets asked, they're going to give you a different response.
And I completely appreciate that nuance within that interaction with the
patient but I can just speak to the intent of the measure. And so the intent
truly is to look at all forms of tobacco use that you have that patient and
obviously, when abstractors are going to go back in and look to see if
screening was performed and if the patient was positive for tobacco use,
they're going to have to rely on the medical documentation that they find
within the chart. And so, you know, that's a question for the nuance of
assessment skill I would say that if the patient -- the question was, "Do you
smoke?" and the patient says, "No," but you understand that they chew, how
they would interact with the chart to document that. And so, again, that's
sort of a nuance and I can just speak to that intent that the measure is
truly looking for all types of tobacco use.
I believe it was last -- it was in 2018 and I remember on the weekly calls
early in the year when we – you know, during the time that we were actually collecting all the data, this topic was discussed ad nauseam and we were told
12
last year that if -- and the way I understood it was if we only documented
that we assessed for smoking, that it -- we could not use that. That would
not count for the numerator because we did not assess for all forms of
tobacco. So, we spent a whole lot of time this year redesigning our EHR to
ensure that we captured both forms of tobacco. But now this year, you're
saying, as long as you just ask for smoking, you're good.
So, no, I want to just clarify that that is a piece of it, but that's not
completely what I said. And so, what I'm saying is the intent of the measure
truly looks at all forms of tobacco use, non-specific question. And how you
framed that question as a clinician to the patient in that interaction can
get a little bit tricky in the way that you're getting or procuring that
information from your patient and then transcribing it into the
documentation. So, I am not saying that you should ask a specific question or
that the question of "Do you smoke?" is irrelevant, that's a relevant
question. But I'm saying that it could be broader, and I'm saying that the
intent of the measure is truly to assess for all forms of tobacco use
regardless of route, so inhalation, chewing, like, that's what I'm trying to
say. And I do appreciate that, you know, this has been a really -- it's been
hard to sort of translate into clinical flow, and I appreciate your feedback.
I will say that we do take these questions back to the measure steward and
this is how we get to this point of its clarification and guidance from the
steward. We do interact with them on these questions. Is that helpful? Or do
you -- should we open a help desk ticket to discuss further, would that be
helpful?
Okay. Great, thank you. We will let you know if another question from the
same line comes in. All right, your next question asks, “Can we do full
screening over the phone?”
Hi, this is Olga from the PIMMS team. So, the setting of the screening is not
restricted to an office setting and, yes, it can be completed during a
telehealth encounter.
Great, thank you. All right. Next, “What is the reporting period for
Promoting Interoperability?”
So, this is Lisa Marie. So similar to Quality reporting via the Web
Interface, it's from January 2nd to March 31st. So, that's also for
Improvement Activities and Promoting Interoperability. So, it’s all
performance categories that you’re required to submit data on, the submission
period is the same timeframe. There was another question with regards to the
test period. So, as we said earlier in the presentation, for this year, there
is not a test period for the Web Interface. So, the Web Interface will just
open promptly on January 2nd. And because you have a longer timeframe to
submit data, which is actually three months compared to previous years which
was eight weeks, we no longer have a test period since you have a longer time
frame to actually submit data. So again, there is no test period.
Great, thank you. All right. We’ve had a few more questions come in over the
phone line. So, Martin Genz, we are unmuting your line, you may go ahead.
All right, thank you. I'm going to go back to the PREV-10 question again. I'm
looking at a screenshot of slide 50 of the frequently asked questions. The
question is, “Do we need documentation that we screen for both smoking and
13
smokeless tobacco to meet the screening portion of the measure?” And the answer goes on to say, "No, per the measure steward, you do not need to
document the patient was screened for both smoking and smokeless tobacco for
the 2019 report." So, from what I hear, everything seems to be, you know,
it's talking in circles here. So, which is it -- do we need tobacco or just
smoking? And I think everybody has the same question. Thank you.
Yeah. I appreciate that. The queue has blown up a little bit for questions.
And again, it's -- the intent is, it's going to be for all types of tobacco,
so I guess if we're considering turning tobacco smokeless, the answer would
be -- that would be included, yes, so tobacco use in the form of -- I guess,
however you guys are interpreting as smoking and non-smoking tobacco. I'm
looking at my team here. Do you guys have any other thoughts on this,
additions?
This is Deb. I'm not sure if this is going to be very helpful or not. We
understand that in previous years, the guidance was, you needed to ensure you
were screening and asking the question, "Do you smoke?" And question number
two, "Do you use smokeless tobacco?" What the measure developer has provided
us for clarification is the intent of the measure is that you are screening
for tobacco use. But if you happen to ask, "Do you chew tobacco?" And the
patient says, "Yes, I do." And you documented, "Yes, you're a tobacco user,"
and you provide cessation intervention, you've met the measure. Let's say the
patient was always a smoker and so the provider happen to just ask, "Do you
smoke, are you still smoking?" And the patient says, "No, I don't." And you
have that documented in the medical record, you've met the intent of the
measure. The nuance that's changed is that you no longer have to show
specifically that you asked those questions. Clinically, you're probably
asking, or you may find it's most important to ask, "Are you a tobacco user?"
And that's covering both smoking and smokeless tobacco. But if your questions
are phrased in such a way that you only happen to be asking about one form of
tobacco use and you have that documented in the medical records then you pass
the measure. Does that help?
Possibly, I think this one's going to be discussed on a few more of these
calls, thanks.
Oh, sure. I'm sure it will be. Thank you.
Great, thank you. All right. We've gotten a few questions on the sample file,
so please can you clarify when the list of sample patients will be available
and how can you find it?
Hi, this is Ozlem. On January 2nd at 10:00 AM when submission period starts
for Web Interface, you will be able to access the Web Interface and download
your beneficiary sample file. Thank you.
And this is Kristin, just to clarify -- for ACOs, the patient ranking files
will be sent prior to the opening of the Web Interface. And the release of
the patient ranking files will be announced in upcoming ACO Spotlight
Newsletters with details on how to access it. Thank you.
Okay. Thank you. All right. Next--
Lauren, I know that--
14
Yup?
-- We're at 2:00. But I saw some other questions with regard to Web Interface
FAQs so I just want to address that. Yesterday, we released a direct
communication to all groups registered to the Web Interface with the link to
the posting of the Web Interface FAQs. Also, so that you're -- so you're able
to access them on the Resource Library, and if you received your email from
us that was sent out yesterday, the link to the document is there. Also, in
the Web Interface, as Ozlem show the -- you know, the navigation panel on the
left-hand side of the Web Interface, there is a listing for the FAQs. So,
you'll be able to access them actually in the Web Interface also. So, we just
want to highlight what those resources are.
Great. Thank you, Lisa Marie. All right. And just for clarification, this
webinar is scheduled until 2:30, so please stay on the line if you have a few
more questions.
Oh.
The next question does ask, "How do we know if a clinician meets a threshold
for Web Interface reporting versus MIPS reporting?"
Can you repeat that question?
Of course. It asks, "How do we know if a clinician meets a threshold for Web
Interface reporting versus MIPS reporting?"
So, the Web Interface requires that all measures are reported on and you have
to report on at least 248 consecutively ranked beneficiaries. If your pool or
sample is less than 248 for each measure, then you report on your total of
beneficiaries. So, the reporting requirements for the CMS Web Interface is
different for other submission types through Web Interface, so there's not a
threshold. So, as I noted, for Web Interface you report on all measures, and
report on at least 248 consecutively ranked beneficiaries, or if you have
less, you can report on all of them.
Hi, Lisa Marie. If I can add on to that, when you are reporting in the Web
Interface, there are indicators, various indicators to show your reporting
progress as you complete measures, or as you meet the minimum reporting
requirement for each measure, that measure will be indicated as a requirement
met and complete. So, the -- in additionally, you can also go to the report
section and you can see your progress and your status on completion in
various reports available within the Web Interface.
All right. Great. Thank you. Next question, we'll go back to the phone line.
So, Olivia Tucker, we'll go ahead and unmute your line and you may ask your
question.
Hi, thank you. My question is, when is the next webinar that will include us
to be able to ask questions about the hypertension measure? I think you had
stated that earlier but I missed it.
So, for -- that will be January 15th.
15
Okay. Thanks.
Okay. Great. Thank you. Next question is also from the phone line. It's from
Dominique Buhl. Dominique Buhl, we've unmuted your line. You can go ahead.
Oh, mine's already been answered. Thank you.
Great. Thanks for letting us know. All right. Next question asks, “Can you
get bonus points if you answer more than the required 248 consecutive
measures?”
This is Lisa Marie. So, if you report more than 248 consecutively ranked
beneficiaries, you do not get bonus points or it does not necessarily
increase your score. If you report more, you're welcome to, but you're not
required to. And if you do so, it doesn't provide bonus points. And it may
not necessarily increase your score.
Great. Thank you. All right. Just as a reminder, if you would like to ask
your question over the phone, please make sure that you are connected to
audio. And you may have to input your unique audio pin in order to ask a
question. Right. So next question asks, “What is the average turnaround time
to hear from QPP whether your skip reason is accepted or not?”
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS Team. So that question is really dependent
on a couple of things. The first is how much information is provided
regarding the skip request when it's submitted. We shoot to have them
reviewed and resolved within three days, but there might be cases where we
need more additional information, or your specific case requires further
investigation. So, we anticipate about three days but just keep in mind there
may be situations where your response takes a bit longer.
All right. Great. Thank you. We'll go back to the phone line. So, we have a -
- a question from Amy Poteat. Amy, you may go ahead and ask the question.
Hi, I have a question regarding the bonus for uploading information. I would
like some additional information. If you're an ACO, is there an opportunity
to get those bonus points? I have not heard any information around that.
Hi, if you--
If you are referring—
Go ahead.
--to the end-to-end bonus points, you can earn them by using the Excel upload
functionality or the API functionality in Web Interface. Those are for the
end-to-end electronic reporting bonus points.
And that does apply to the ACOs and it applies to groups and virtual groups.
In regard to high priority bonus points, in the 2019 Final Rule it was
determined that those points would no longer be applied to groups and virtual
groups. But it is still applicable to ACOs.
16
Okay. All right. Great. Thank you for that. We have few more questions from
the phone lines so we will turn it to Michael Leivant. Michael, you may go
ahead and ask your question.
Hi. So last year there was a new function or report in QPP that showed data
irregularities. My question was, is that still available for this year? Is
that report downloadable like many of the other reports? And, are those
irregularities still optional in terms of us fixing them?
The data irregularities report is still available this year. That
functionality has not changed, and it will be available and will function as
it did last year.
And is it still optional that we fix it or is it requirement that all those
irregularities be fixed?
Correct. Data irregularities are not errors, so it is optional. It is just to
bring any data irregularity to your attention. It is at your discretion,
whether or not, you would like to fix that.
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. Next question asks, “Regarding the HTN-2
measure, is the denominator including only patients who have had a visit
within the measurement period, and then those who have had blood pressure
controlled? Or is it any patient who had a -- sorry, diagnosis with HTN would
have to visit?”
Hi, so this is Kayte from the PIMMS Team. So, it would be patients with a
denominator eligible visit with the appropriate diagnosis. And then you would
use their most recent blood pressure during the measurement period. And I
believe RTI can speak more to the sampling process and criteria for that
measure.
Okay. We can go back to that as well. We have a question from the phone line
from Amanda Ballinger. So, Amanda, you may go ahead and ask your question.
Is it talking, or --
Amanda--
Hi, this is -- this -- sorry. This is obviously not Amanda, but same phone
line. A question with regards to the end-to-end reporting bonus. If we upload
information out of our EMR into the populated Excel file, and then also make
corrections via the Interface afterwards, is that still qualified for bonus
points?
Can you repeat your question?
Sure. So, with regards to the end-to-end reporting and bonus points
associated with that, if we are taking the sample file and then populating it
with EMR data out of our EMR directly, and then uploading that into the
Interface, and then also making corrections via the Interface to the sample
file, does that qualify for end-to-end reporting bonus points?
17
Once you use the Excel upload functionality to submit your data, you earn
bonus points. Later on, going back to the Web Interface and using the data,
Manual Data Entry functionality will not impact the bonus points you already
earned. So, you will still earn the--
Oh. Perfect. Thank you.
--Excel upload.
Great. Thank you. All right. Next question asks, “Are there only” -- oh. I
just lost it. Hang on just a moment. “Are there only specific CPT codes for
telehealth for false screening and influenza that can be reviewed with
beneficiary? Or is it basically any kind of -- sorry, conversation with
beneficiary where the information captured and documented in the EMR count?”
Hi, this is Angie from the PIMMS Team. Telehealth is not narrowly defined for
the purpose of collecting information to the numerator for the Web Interface
measures. The measures that do allow telehealth can be obtained over the
phone, email, et cetera. The medical record documentation is required to
support what is reported. But no, it isn't particular codes. It's just a
method by which it is obtained. Thank you.
Great. Thank you. All right. Next question is from the phone line. It's from
Mark Smith. So, Mark Smith, you may go ahead and ask your question. Mark
Smith, you may go ahead and ask your question. All right. So, we'll move
back. Another question asks, “If our ACO uses the Excel upload for some but
not all of the reporting, are we still eligible to earn the end-to-end bonus
points?”
That is correct. You can do partial Excel upload. And you will earn bonus
points for that Excel upload that was completed. It does not require full
file or it does not -- in order to earn bonus points, you can use combination
of these methods. It does not require that a hundred percent of your
submission was completed through Excel. So, you will still earn bonus points
for using the Excel upload functionality.
Great. Thank you. Going back to a previous question we have, “What is the
definition of a telehealth encounter, and is it a certain codes only?”
Hi, this is Angie from PIMMS. I think we just answered that. And I -- what
was the last part of the question regarding telehealth?
Does it pertain to certain codes only?
Okay. The answer is no. Again, it's -- certain measures do allow obtaining
the information during a telehealth encounter. But it does not have to be
billable, a Medicare covered billable encounter code, just a method by which
the information is obtained. And it must be documented in the medical record
to support what's reported for a measure. Thank you.
Great. Thank you. All right. I think we have Mark Smith back on the line. So,
Mark, you may go ahead and ask your question. All right. Nevermind. We'll try
from Lisa Tranausky. Lisa, I've unmuted your line. You may go ahead.
My question was already answered.
18
All right. Great. Thank you. All right. Next question asks, “Does a PHQ-9 not
count for adolescents?”
Hi, this is the PIMMS Team. So -- okay. So yeah, the PHQ-9 can be used. It's
a modified PHQ-9 that's specifically for children.
All right. Great. Thank you. All right. One more question from Michael
Leivant. Michael, you may go ahead and ask your question.
Thanks. So, regarding all these kind of measure updates that have been
discussed today and will be discussed in the future. Have those changes been
made to the measure logic that CMS releases to EMR systems? So, for instance,
our EMR system has work with and received files from CMS. It really explains
the logic behind these measures so that they can build necessary reports for
us. Have those been updated to reflect the things that we've just talked
about today and others?
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS Team. So, the coding document Release Notes
do outline all of the coding changes and that would impact subsequent logic
changes to the measure. So those are available in that Supporting Documents,
zip file on the Quality Payment Program Resource Library, along with the
Release Notes to the narrative specifications. Thank you.
Great. Thank you. All right. We have another question on the HTN-2 question.
Can you please clarify the sampling criteria?
Hi, this is Kristin from RTI, and I think this goes back to a previous
question. And just to clarify, in order for beneficiaries to be eligible for
any measure in the sample they need to have had two visits within the ACO or
group within the measurement period. And then we look for a diagnosis of
hypertension within the first six months in the year prior to the measurement
period, and then the encounter codes for the hypertension measure in --
within the same timeframe.
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. One more question from the phone line from
Renee McCord. Renee, we've unmuted your line. You may go ahead.
Hi, there. You had mentioned one of the slides for measure MH-1 that there
was a difference between the PHQ-A and the PHQ-M. Can you clarify if either
can be used for the measure reporting?
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS Team. So, for 2019 reporting, the PHQ-9 or
PHQ-9M may be used for the measure. The PHQ -- excuse me. Although the PHQ-9
is used and endorsed by several societies, this modification of the PHQ-9M
has not been formally validated. So, for 2019, the tool has not reached --
excuse me. The measure steward decided to allow both tools, PHQ-9 and PHQ-9M
for adolescents. And do not district tool use by age. Thank you.
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. Next questions asks, “Can you please
elaborate on the depression screening measure?” All right. Just to re-ask. Can you please elaborate on the depression screening measure?
Hi, this is Kayte--
19
Kayte -- okay, sorry. Go ahead, Kayte.
I was going to say, I think whoever submitted that question, we might need a
little bit more information on what your specific inquiry is regarding that
question. So, if we could just get a little bit of clarification, we can
address your question in more detail. Or, if you would like to, you can
submit a help desk ticket. Thank you.
Okay. Looks like they're calling into the phone line. So Rajitha Kamshatti,
you may go ahead.
Hi, can you hear me?
Yes, loud and clear.
Yeah. Hi, this is Rajitha, so I have a question that is regarding the
depression screening. In one of the slides you mentioned we need to look for
the tools that we used, the screening tools, the names of those and it should
be documented in the EHR. So, do we have to look for those? If they're, like,
they're not documented, can we still consider them or not? Or could we just
score, like, looking at the scores?
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS team. So, the direction for 2019 PREV-12, in
regards to required documentation, is aligned with what is in the measure
specifications. So, per page six of the specification, the name of the
appropriate standardized depression screening tool must be utilized and
documented in the medical record. So, if just the questions are available in
the EMR, that's not sufficient. It must have the name of the screening tool
utilized. Thank you.
Okay, thanks.
Great. Thank you. All right. Your next question asks, “Are there any changes
to Excel templates for 2019? And if so, is there a document that outlines
them?”
There are several changes to the template. There are obviously measure
changes and few other changes that you can easily identify by comparing the
file from last year to this year. Excel template has been published on the
QPP Resource Library. So, you could go to the QPP Resource Library and
download a copy of the Excel template. But at this time, we do not have a
document that outlines the changes compared to the last year. Thank you.
All right. Great, thank you. All right. We have another question from the
phone line from Debby Smith. So Debby, you may go ahead.
Yeah. Hi, can you hear me?
Yup. You may go ahead.
Oh. I just wanted to clarify the skip process. I’m reading through the
questions chat and I'm a little -- I just want to make sure I have it
correct. The skip process for Other CMS Approved Reasons, that's only needed
for reasons outside of a standard exclusions exemptions process would be or
is that for all skips?
20
Hi, this is Laura. That is correct. It is only for no Other CMS Approved
Reasons. All the other skip request reasons such as denominator exclusion,
those are standard as we've recorded before.
And they're submitted right to the spreadsheet uploaded through QPP?
Correct. You can select denominator exclusion as an answer for if the patient
qualified for the measure in the Excel template and upload.
Great. Thanks.
No Other CMS Approved Reason is reserved for unique cases that do not go with
other skip reasons.
Great. Thank you.
All right. Thank you. Next question asks, “If we are in our first year, pay
for reporting, do we submit MIPS as planned or do we have to submit to the
Interface?”
From the Shared Savings Program. If this is an ACO, which I'm presuming it
probably is because of the question about case reporting, then the
requirements for submitting for the Shared Savings Program, you'd have to
submit your measures through the CMS Web Interface. But it would actually be
good if you could actually give us a little bit more information on that
question, please.
Okay, if you're able to raise your hand, we'll go ahead and unmute you. And
in the meantime, we have a question from Melissa Reed, I believe on flu and
telehealth encounter. So—yeah, so, can you please just clarify to her
correctly that you cannot take flu in a telehealth encounter.
Hi, this is Jamie with PIMMS. You can go ahead and take an assessment of flu
on -- during a telehealth encounter. Thanks.
Thank you, Jamie.
All right. So, going back to the previous question. Brittany, we've unmuted
your line so you can elaborate.
Can you guys hear me?
Yes, you may go ahead.
Okay. So, we were approved as an ACO on July 1. And we have our providers
reporting MIPS for 2000 -- well, year 2018. But for the rest of this year, we
were just making sure that we don't have to submit for the previous year on
the Interface. So that will be all for 2019. It's not going to be for 2018,
correct?
This is Sarah from the Shared Savings Program. So, for the -- your ACO in
2020, you would be reporting for -- it's going to be a 2019 through the CMS
Web Interface through your ACO participants.
21
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. So, we got about five minutes left. So,
we'll take a few more questions. We have one more in the phone line from Sean
Shillinger. So, Sean, you may go ahead.
Hi. I just wanted to clarify the question that was asked about a PHQ-2or PHQ-
9 resembling a PHQ-2 or 9 without being named. And the answer was, it must be
named. This contradicts a QPP response I got last year saying as long as it
resembles it exactly, per the wording, that it would count.
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS Team. So, yes, the updated items for 2019
recording the lines with the measure specifications, and again states that
the name of the tool must be documented in the medical record, and that can
be -- that reference can be found on page 6 of the measure specification.
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. Next question asks, so “Please confirm
that there's no document this year that compared to 2018 measurements --
measures, sorry, to 2019 measures and/or any updates for measure.”
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS team again. So, there are documents out
there that do outline the changes within the narrative specifications and as
well as the coding documents. So those are found on the Quality Payment
Resource Library within the 2019 CMS Web Interface Supporting Documents. And
again, there are Release Notes outlining changes from 2018 to 2019 for the
narrative specs as well as the coding documents.
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. We'll take one more phone question from
Christina Tomaselli. So, Christina, you may go ahead.
Hi. I just had a question about the depression measure clarification. I was
looking in the specification, and it looks like for follow-up on a positive
screening that they do not take a negative PHQ-9. So, if you do a PHQ-2 and
it's positive, in previous years, we were given guidance that you could
accept a PHQ-9 done on the same day that was then negative. But it looks like
that was taken away, that option.
Hi, this is Kayte from the PIMMS Team. So, we're currently reviewing this
issue. And we would just ask that any PREV-12 questions be directed to
[email protected]. Thank you. Hopefully, that was the right email address.
[ Laughing ]
Great. Thank you. So, next question asks, “Can you please clarify if the PHQ-
M and the PHQ-A be used for the MH-1 measure or are you stating that it has
to be PHQ-M?”
Can you please repeat the question?
Of course. It asks, “Can you please clarify if the PHQ-M and the PHQ-A be
used for the MH-1 measure or are you stating that it has to be PHQ-M?”
So, either the PHQ-9 or PHQ-9M may be used for the 2019 MH-1 measure.
Okay. Great. Thank you. All right. Looks like that's all the time we have
today for questions. So, thank you very much. And Lisa Marie, we'll turn it
back to you to conclude the webinar.
22
Great. Thank you. Again, I want to thank everyone for your participation in
answering your questions. Unfortunately, we weren't able to get to all of the
questions. But if you have any questions remaining, please submit your
questions to the Quality Payment Program Service Center, and we'll address
those questions. Again, our next webinar will begin on January 1st*2. And we
look forward to having you all join us. Again, thank you for joining us today
and have a great day. Thank you everyone.
2 The next webinar will be held on January 15th.
23