Upload
mckayla-dykes
View
216
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
WP7 IntegratedTransition Strategies
TURAS External ReviewBrussels 24 July 2013
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
ITS Context Setting
Professional Culture Disciplinary Approach Thematical focus
Explicit objectives Implicit objectives
Strategic objectives/key terms Planning strategy on urban-regional scale
: Architecture and urban-regional Planning: Spatial Planning and Development: Planning Theory and Methodology
: WP Synergies, Project Synthesis: Integrated Planning, Knowledge Transfer
: transition, urban, resilience, sustainability, integration
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
objectives
prepare integrated transition approach for combining the outcomes of one or more of the WP 2-6• framework / Matrix: problem definitions, data needed, actors etc.• methodology for integrationprepare integrated transition strategy (ITS) for each participating TURaS city• further aspects of urban resilience developed and tested in other TURaS cities• demonstration and assessment in terms of impact and transferabilityprepare transferable final ITS framework / methodology for non-TURAS cities• modular structure based on TURaS outcomes• user-friendliness, accessibility
milestones & deliverables
• Trans. Strategy Workshop
• Circulation of (city) ITSIntegrated Transition Report
• Publication of (city) ITS
Final Transition Guidelines
task
7.1
7.2
7.3
…
36373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Year
4Y
ear
5…
WP7 content & objectives
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
milestones & deliverables
• Transition Strategy Workshop• Circulation of (city) ITSIntegrated Transition Report
• Publication of (city) ITS
Final Transition Guidelines
◦ Draft of integrated (≙ urban) transition strategy
task
7.1
7.2
7.3
◦ Project Stakeholder Analysis
objectives
◦ Methodology for „common terminology“
◦ Literature review & contribution to „urban resilience theory“
010203040506070809101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
Year
1Y
ear
2Y
ear
3Y
ear
4Y
ear
5
7.0
◦ Methodology for „integration“
◦ WP 7 Risk Analysis assess status and risks of WP7 within project
• knowledge gaps vs. holistic approach• project terminology• capacities for WP7 (per partner / WP)
conceptualise “urban resilience” as a strategic objective for WP7 (planning)• resilience vs. sustainability• different sectorial conceptualisations vs. integration in “overall” urban strategy • operationalisability vs. uncertainty/complexity
conceptualise “transition strategy” in context of “urban resilience”• strategic planning vs. bottom-up & flexibility• transition management towards urban resilience
Key steps
„black box“
WP7 content adaptation
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Capacity Inventory in Excel
Uneven distribution of ressources
WP7 status & risk analysis
WP7 working paper on websiteWP7 part of Project Periodic Report M1-18
Topical (sectorial) selection vs. holistic (urban) overall project goalLack of „time framing“ of transitions aimed for in WP 2-6 Very heterogeneous, wide & flexible use of „resilience“ through all WPsSectorial professional language vs. Common terminologyLack of examples of operationalisable definitions/conceptualisations of „urban resilience“ (literature & practice)Lack of indicators for/of resilience (literature & project‘s research capacity)Tension between need/expectation for „ready-to-use“ working definitions and evolutionary bottom-up structure of project
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
WP7 status & risk analysis
WP2
WP3WP4
WP 5
WP6
L
R
SRNLR
DR
S
S
source: EM Stumpp
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Common Terminology
Methodology – Key Terms to Glossary
Collection of potential key terms: Kick-off working sheets, DoW, SCMeetingsPre-selection (and reduction) of key terms on people level: partner (individual) survey (questionnaire) TURAS Operational VocabularySelection of key terms on WP level: WP leader survey (questionnaire) in collaboration with task leaders WP key termsCollocation of working groups (lead by WPs) & allocation of key termsDefinition (& differentiation) of key terms: (interdisciplinary) dialogues Turas expert groups (Wiki)Edition & publication for partners TURAS Glossary (ready for public site)
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Common Terminology
WP7 key terms on TURAS Wiki
Example for Wiki use
Conceptual frame to substantiate & detail the terms for WP context
Open to discussion
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
What means resilience in the disciplinary context of planning (vs. sustainability)?
What means URBAN resilience (versus e.g. ecological or psychological resilience)?
How can urban resilience be operationalised (integration, evaluation etc.)?
Conceptualising Urban Resilience
What means resilience in the disciplinary context of planning (vs. sustainability)?
What means URBAN resilience (versus e.g. ecological or psychological resilience)?
How can urban resilience be operationalised (integration, evaluation etc.)?
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
De-composing Urban Resilience
RESILIENCE = System property (neutral) ability (positive)
Type: [speak] general physics ecology psychology engineer. …
SCOPE„ of “ system material ecosystem creatures network
MECHANISM
„ to “ resileabsorb, release
persistsustain,recover,improve
maintain,provide
MODULUS
„ up to“constant change
of statusplastic
deformationdestinction of
populationadjustment
disorder
insufficient level of service
CONDITION
internal„in face
of “ disturbance stresschange of
stable statesstress faults
external
[caused by] pressure
adverse circumstances
misconfi-guration,
attack
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Framing Urban Resilience
RESILIENCE
SYSTEMIC DIMENSION ecological psycholog. technical social econom. organis. …
MODES
political concept: Resilience
Metaphor
x x x
paradigm of action: Resilience
Approach
x x x x
analytical framework: Resilience
Thinking
x x x x x
system property: Resilience
x x
desc
riptiv
e
nor
mati
ve
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Conceptualising Urban Resilience
What means resilience in the disciplinary context of planning (vs. sustainability)?
What means URBAN resilience (versus e.g. ecological or psychological resilience)?
How can urban resilience be operationalised (integration, evaluation etc.)?
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
ITS combined approaches
Elements
Transdisiplinary (sustainability)
research
Transition Management
Strategic Planning …
Resilience Assessment
TURAS
target To attend complex societal problems by combining knowledge of various scientific disciplines with societal expertise
To enable transitions towards sustainability by overcoming persisting problems
To provide orienta-tion & give a long term dimension to urban-regional development by new & intensive interlinks
To assess and resolve specific ressource questions by taking into account social & ecological influences & continuous change
To transition towards urban sustainability and resilience by collaboration and innovation
scope society Sectorial context (e.g. transport)
multi-sectorial: economic, ecologic, social (, technical)
Social-ecological systems
(Multi-)sectorial,Urban system
scale Multi-scale (local, urban, regional, national
local (community), urban (cluster of municipalities)
Multi-scale (local, urban, regional, national
local, system boundary (multiple scales)
local (community), urban-regional
principles Inter- & trans-disciplinary integration, coordination of knowledge
social learning, accommodating complexity & uncertainty, steer- ing & dynamics
goal-orientation, discursive methodo-logy, multi-stage procedures
Complex adaptive systems theory, change & uncertain-ty, adaptive cycle, panarchy …
Twinning approach for collaboration (researchers-local enterprises-urban communities)
format Inter-disciplinary research teams, practice partners, iterative processes
Series of participatory workshops
Formal and informal planning instruments
Discussion groups/workshops with system‘s stakeholders
Classic research (sectorial work packages), demonstration sites
Methods/ tools, actors, process, etc.
Knowledge objects, common termino-logy, theor. framing
…
transition arena, experiments (urban labs)
…
Pilot projects, imple-mentation concepts, monitoring
…
…Resilience Assess-ment method: system context, scenario
…
new visionsspatial scenariosfeasibility strategiesguidance tools
…
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Strategic Integration
Organisational Dimension
Level I-IIIContent & ProcessScope: research
Methodological Dimension
Level I-III (-IV)Content & ProcessScope: strategic planning
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Strategic Integration
Organisational Dimension
Integration I-IIIEvaluation
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Strategic Integration
Methodological Dimension
TURAS Core ElementsStakeholder groups Integration IIntegration II: Context for decision making Mechanism for coordination Mechanism for delivery Mechanism for controlIntegration III: NavigationIntegration IV: Dissemination
Methodological Dimension
TURAS Core ElementsStakeholder groups Integration IIntegration II: Context for decision making Mechanism for coordination Mechanism for delivery Mechanism for controlIntegration III: NavigationIntegration IV: Dissemination
Methodological Dimension
TURAS Core ElementsStakeholder groups Integration IIntegration II: Context for decision making Mechanism for coordination Mechanism for delivery Mechanism for controlIntegration III: NavigationIntegration IV: Dissemination
Methodological Dimension
TURAS Core ElementsStakeholder groups Integration IIntegration II: Context for decision making Mechanism for coordination Mechanism for delivery Mechanism for controlIntegration III: NavigationIntegration IV: Dissemination
Methodological Dimension
TURAS Core ElementsStakeholder groups Integration IIntegration II: Context for decision making Mechanism for coordination Mechanism for delivery Mechanism for controlIntegration III: NavigationIntegration IV: Dissemination
TRANSITIONING TOWARD URBAN RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Outlook
Evaluation of key term survey (part I - individual level)
Distribution of WP leader questionnaire(including key term survey part II)
Publication of „contribution to resilience theory“
Furthering the „integrated (≙ urban) transition strategy approach“:draft of academic paper for discussion
Preparation of WP7 Kick-Off for local authorities / urban regionsat annual meeting (Nov, Rome)