Translocation guide for community groups › ... › translocation › guide-for-community-gro… · The guide also applies to some translocations of indigenous land plants (refer

Translocation guide for community groups The translocation process—from the idea to reporting

Version 1: Approved 12 April 2011 Last updated: August 2012

Last printed 10/04/2014 15:25:00 Page 2 of 39 docDM-363788 - Translocation guide for community groups

C O N T E N T S

1. Purpose 4

1.1 Purpose 4 1.2 What is translocation? 4 1.3 Why the Translocation Guide is needed 5 1.4 When is an approved translocation proposal required? 5 1.5 Which translocations do not require an approved translocation proposal? 6 1.6 What the Translocation Guide does not cover 8 1.7 Do I need an approved translocation proposal? 9

2. The translocation process 11 2.1 Overview of the Process 11 2.2 Detailed translocation process 12

3. About this document 13

4. Getting started 15 4.1 The process to follow 15 4.2 Useful resources 15

5. Making the commitment to carry on and prepare a translocation proposal 16 5.1 The process to follow 16 5.2 Useful resources 17

6. Preparing the translocation proposal and planning the translocation 18 6.1 The process to follow 18 6.2 Key resources 19

7. Submit the translocation proposal for processing 20 7.1 The process to follow 20

8. Carrying out the transfer 22 8.1 The process to follow 22

9. Research, monitoring and post-release management 23 9.1 After the transfer 23 9.2 Post-release assessment for a one-off transfer 23 9.3 Review outcomes for multiple transfers 23

10. Reporting 25 10.1 Types of report 25 10.2 The process to follow 26 10.3 Key resources 27


11. Acknowledgements 28

12. References 29

Appendix 1 30 Terminology and definitions 30

Appendix 2 35 Useful websites when planning a translocation 35

Appendix 3 38 Paperwork and information to use when preparing a translocation proposal 38


1. Purpose

1 . 1 P U R P O S E

This Guide is for community groups, other organisations and individuals when they are planning and carrying out translocations of New Zealand’s indigenous plants and animals (as specified in section 1.4). It covers the entire translocation process, from the initial idea, to planning and preparation of a translocation proposal, approval of the translocation, granting of permits, carrying out the translocation and final reporting.

The purpose of this Guide is to:

1. Assist people to achieve good decision making on translocation projects from planning through to implementation

2. Encourage learning from translocations and continual improvement by recording what happens, analysing the results and making them available to others

3. Assist the preparation and processing of translocation proposals in an efficient and effective way for both community groups and the Department of Conservation (DOC)

Key users:

• Community groups / other organisations / individuals planning translocations

• Contractors writing translocation proposals

1 . 2 W H A T I S T R A N S L O C A T I O N ?

Translocation is defined in this Guide as the managed movement of live plants or animals (taonga) from one location to another. Translocation covers the entire process, including planning, the transfer, release, monitoring and post-release management (up to some predetermined end point). A translocation can consist of one or more transfers.

Transfer is the part of the translocation that involves the physical movement of the plants or animals from one location to another and their release or planting at the new site.

Translocation may occur:

• As short- or long-term measure to secure or recover threatened species. A translocation enables new populations to be established, existing populations to be enhanced, or locally extinct species to be re-established.

• As part of a restoration programme.

• To establish a species at a new location for a specific purpose such as advocacy, education, or scientific study.

There are three types of translocation into the wild:


• Supplementation—where the species already exists at the release site

• Re-introduction—where the species no longer exists at the release site but is still within its previous range

• Introduction—where the release site is outside the previous range of the species (i.e. release to a site the species has never been before)

1 . 3 W H Y T H E T R A N S L O C A T I O N G U I D E I S N E E D E D

The aim of this Translocation Guide is to ensure that translocations are undertaken for the right reasons, avoid unintended consequences, and have the best chance of success; also, that we learn from them to improve the chance of success of future translocations.

This Guide also ensures that translocations approved by DOC are consistent with the legislation under which DOC works.

The Guide follows the IUCN world practice for translocations (IUCN 1995) (refer to Appendix 1 terminology and definitions).

The Department of Conservation recognised the need for guidance on translocations early on, producing its first guidelines in 1990. Translocation can have important, long-lasting effects—not just on the animal or plant being moved, but often on its whole environment. It is important that these aspects have been thought through carefully by people who want to carry out translocations and by those who approve them.

Consultation with iwi affected by the proposal and stakeholders is important to ensure ongoing support and to maintain strong working relationships. Failure to engage with all stakeholders can put future translocations at risk.

Translocation is often a complex, lengthy and expensive process.

1 . 4 W H E N I S A N A P P R O V E D T R A N S L O C A T I O N P R O P O S A L R E Q U I R E D ?

The Department requires community groups and others to have an approved translocation proposal (in addition to permits) before carrying out some types of translocation; most commonly, translocations of protected indigenous native animals and unprotected threatened invertebrates, with a number of exceptions (explained in Section 1.5). The guide also applies to some translocations of indigenous land plants (refer to flow diagram 1). This guide explains how to prepare a translocation proposal.

A permit gives legal permission to carry out an activity (such as entry, capture of wildlife etc.) in accordance with the piece of legislation the permit is granted under (e.g. Wildlife Act 1953, Reserves Act 1977). It includes conditions that must be complied with. Note: activities relating to the translocation of plants and animals are covered by several pieces of legislation, and are not described in detail in this document.

A translocation proposal provides in-depth information about the reasons for the translocation, the possible effects it may have, the proposed plan of action and what consultation has been carried out. When DOC approves your translocation proposal, it will also issue you with permits that allow you to carry out the translocation activities you require (such as capture of wildlife) using the methods described in your approved translocation proposal.

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1953/0031/latest/DLM276814.html?search=ts_act_wildlife+act_resel&p=1&sr=1�


To simplify the application process, the Translocation Proposal Form acts as an application form for the translocation and for most of the permits required from DOC. Note: permits for banding/marking animals and entry to non-DOC land, and approvals from the Animal Ethics Committee need to be applied for separately.

Even if you do not need an approved translocation proposal for your translocation, you are still likely to need permits. Permits are required for:

• Translocations of wildlife covered by the Wildlife Act 1953. This includes marine species listed as absolutely protected under the Wildlife Act 1953, plus translocations of wildlife from or onto land owned or managed by people other than DOC (i.e. permits are needed to move protected wildlife wherever they are found).

• Translocation of freshwater species defined as aquatic life (refer to Appendix 1 terminology and definitions).

• Translocation of marine mammals.

• Collecting or releasing animals or plants on land managed by DOC.

To find out whether you will need an approved translocation proposal for your translocation, read together Section 1.5—Which translocations do not require an approved translocation proposal in addition to a permit and Section 1.7—Do I need an approved translocation proposal? You should also seek further advice from staff in your local DOC Area Office.

1 . 5 W H I C H T R A N S L O C A T I O N S D O N O T R E Q U I R E A N A P P R O V E D T R A N S L O C A T I O N P R O P O S A L ?

Permits are required for most translocations; however, the following do not require an approved translocation proposal in addition to a permit:

—Captive to captive transfers

Captive facilities must:

• Have a permit from DOC to hold wildlife.

• Meet the requirements of DOC’s Captive Management Policy (DOC 2003) and the Captive Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)(DOC 2008). Contact your local DOC office to find out more.

The permit to hold will state the conditions for transfer.

—Injured or sick wildlife

For native animals that are injured or sick and treated under Wildlife Act 1953 permits ‘to temporarily hold sick and injured wildlife’, the permit gives the conditions for transfer.

—Aquatic life





Aquatic life is defined in Appendix 1: Terminology and definitions. The Aquatic Life Transfers SOP sets out the process for applications to DOC to transfer and release live aquatic life to freshwater under several pieces of legislation. There are different approval requirements for translocation of aquatic life; contact DOC Area Office staff for information. Note: the definition of ‘aquatic life’ includes indigenous and exotic freshwater animals and plants, including freshwater invertebrates listed on Schedule 7 of the Wildlife Act (terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates declared to be animals).

—Marine plants and animals (except for birds)

Translocations of marine birds need an approved translocation proposal.

Permits are required to collect or release marine species declared to be animals and listed on Schedule 7A of the Wildlife Act (e.g. various coral species, spotted and giant grouper, various shark species and various ray species). Holding marine mammals in captivity is covered by the Marine Mammals Protection Act 1978. Contact DOC marine staff for more information.

—Relocation of wildlife where this is proposed under Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) consents

Where the purpose is to save individual animals (i.e. rescue of individuals affected by development where establishment of a viable population is a secondary purpose) and the distance between the source site and the release site is small (i.e. within a specified maximum distance appropriate to the species; e.g, 500 m for lizards). In addition to the resource consent, Wildlife Act 1953 permits are required to collect and release the animals.

—Exotic animal species

Animal species that are not indigenous to New Zealand are not covered in this SOP. Where these are covered by the Wildlife Act, permits may be required to capture, hold or release them. Permits are required to collect them from or release them on land managed by DOC. For more information contact DOC Area Office staff.

—Indigenous animals listed on

• Schedule 1 Wildlife Act 1953 (wildlife declared to be game)—contact DOC Area staff for information on translocating game

• Schedule 5 Wildlife Act 1953 (wildlife not protected)—permits are required to collect from or release onto land managed by DOC

—Exotic plant species

Plant species that are not indigenous to New Zealand are not covered in this guide.

—Revegetation/restoration planting projects that have a restoration plan

Translocations of multiple species of locally sourced plants for revegetation/restoration purposes should have an approved restoration plan or equivalent that addresses the main risks associated with moving plants. Refer to Appendix 1: Terminology and definitions for what a restoration plan should cover. If the project involves the collection or planting out of plants on land managed by DOC, permits are required to carry out the activity under the Act the land is managed under.

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1953/0031/latest/DLM278598.html?search=ts_act_wildlife+act_resel&p=1�

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1978/0080/latest/DLM25111.html?search=ts_act_marine+mammals_resel&p=1&sr=1�


1 . 6 W H A T T H E T R A N S L O C A T I O N G U I D E D O E S N O T C O V E R

Technical guidance and methods for translocations are not covered by this guide.

Various people will have experience and/or expertise in transferring the targeted species and can be contacted to provide advice. DOC staff will provide you with contact details for Recovery Group leaders and staff with relevant experience/knowledge. Information on potential contacts for technical guidance on translocating the target species can also be found in the document ‘Explanatory Notes for the Translocation Proposal Form’ (DOCDM-774881), which contains a section on ‘Specialist Advice’. You can find others yourself by referring to Appendix 2 Useful websites when planning a translocation.

Information on current agreed best practice techniques for translocating some commonly translocated species is being prepared. Ask your ‘Assigned Contact Person’ if there is a best practice for the species you plan to translocate.

Return to table of contents.


1 . 7 D O I N E E D A N A P P R O V E D T R A N S L O C A T I O N P R O P O S A L ?

Start here

Flow diagram 1. Do I need an approved translocation proposal for my plant translocation?

Is the release site outside the species’

previous range1?

Is the release site

of high ecological integrity1?

Land plant

Yes

No No

Yes

Is the plant being moved to a

different ecological region1, or a site outside its known

varietal provenance1 ?

Freshwater plant

Marine plant Does not require an approved translocation proposal—however, other DOC approvals and/or permits may be needed

Is the source or release

site on DOC-managed

land?

Yes

No

Translocation proposal not needed—but landowner permission is required

Approved translocation proposal and permits required

Yes

No

Are the release site and plant species

covered by a DOC-approved

restoration plan1?

No

YesAquatic Life Transfers SOP applies

Note 1: Refer to Appendix 1: Terminology and definitions for defining criteria


Note 1: Animal includes mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and invertebrates.Note 2: Includes freshwater invertebrates listed on Schedule 7 of the Wildlife Act 1953 (terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates declared to be animals). Freshwater species defined as aquatic

life are covered by the Aquatic Life Transfers SOP.Note 3: Animal species that are not indigenous to New Zealand. Note 4: The purpose is to save individual animals (i.e. rescue individuals affected by the

development. Establishment of viable population is a secondary purpose)Note 5: Small distance—within a specified maximum distance appropriate to the species; e.g. 500 m

for lizards.Note 6: NZ Threat Classification Lists can be found on the DOC website:

http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/conservation/nz-threat-classification-system/(Viewed 18 April 2012)

Find which column your species is represented in

Approved translocation proposal and DOC permits required for:• Bats• Absolutely protected native birds• Native birds listed in the Wildlife Act 1953 Schedules

2 (partially protected) or 3 (wildlife that may be hunted or killed subject to the Minister’s notification)

• Native frogs• Native lizards• Tuatara• Land invertebrates listed in Schedule 7 of the Wildlife

Act 1953• Land invertebrates listed as Threatened or At Risk or

Data Deficient in NZ Threat Classification System Lists6—if collected from or released onto land managed by DOC

Is it a:• Wild to wild translocation?• Wild to captive translocation?• Captive to wild translocation?

Start here

No translocation proposal required—other DOC approvals and/or permits may be needed

No

Does it involve the treatment of sick or injured wildlife?

No

Yes

If the species is not listed above, and you are collecting it from or releasing it onto land managed by DOC, then DOC permits are required.

Yes

Flow diagram 2. Do I need an approved translocation proposal for my animal1 translocation?

Does not require an approved translocation proposal—other DOC approvals and/or permits may be needed:• Freshwater2 or marine species

(except birds)• Exotic animals3 • Indigenous animals listed on:

-Schedule 1 Wildlife Act 1953 (wildlife declared to be game)

-Schedule 5 Wildlife Act 1953 (wildlife not protected)

• Proposed relocation of animals4 a small distance5 as part of an RMA consent



2. The translocation process

2 . 1 O V E R V I E W O F T H E P R O C E S S

Flow diagram 3. Overview of the translocation process

Outline → Talk to DOC and get feedback

Plan translocation and prepare translocation proposal—carry out consultation

Submit proposal to DOC

ApprovalNo

Carry out transfer

Manage,monitor and

report

Inform DOC, iwi and key

stakeholders

No

Yes

Idea

Obtain other approvals and/or permits

Do

not c

arry

out

tran

sloc

atio

n

No

Yes

Yes

If there are

multiple transfers

Decide to carry on


2 . 2 D E T A I L E D T R A N S L O C A T I O N P R O C E S S

Flow diagram 4. The detailed translocation process

You have an idea for a translocation

Talk to DOC

You decide not to carry on

You decide to carry on and find out what is required—talk to DOC

Key:

DOC’s Appointed Processor

Applicant

DOC gets feedback on the outline and gives you feedback

Is the idea feasible? Do an outline of a proposal

DOC processes the proposal and may need additional information from you

Submit your translocation proposal application to DOC for processing

Is a permit or proposal needed? See flow diagrams 1 and 2. Unsure? Check with DOC

Seek landowner approval; and if required Animal Ethics Committee approvals and marking permits

Keep stakeholders involved and informed

Provide information within 15 working days

DOC drafts report and permit conditions and sends to you for comment

Proposal approved and permits issued

Yes

No Do not go ahead with the translocation

Carry out transfer

Obtain other approvals and/or

permits

Do monitoring, research, post-

release management

Evaluate and report

Assess transfer

If required, request approval for next transfer and amendments

to translocation proposal

Next transfer approved

If there are multiple transfers

Yes

No

Inform iwi and key stakeholders

of the results

DOC processes request for next transfer and amendments to translocation proposal

(same timeframe as above)

Inform DOC; DOC

provides feedback

Comment within10 working days

Timeframe for DOC

processing phase:

minimum 70 days

maximum 90 days

Plan your translocation and prepare your translocation proposal

Design your translocation andseek resources

Consult iwi affected by the proposal and other key stakeholders



3. About this document

Document coordinator

Pam Cromarty

Threatened Species Development Section, Ecosystem and Species Unit, Research and Development Group

Document owner

Shaun O’Connor

Manager Threatened Species Development Section, Ecosystem and Species Unit, Research and Development Group

Approved for use

Deputy Director-General Operations, Sue Tucker

Signed

Date 12th April 2011

General Manager Operations Southern, John Cumberpatch

Signed

Date 24th December 2010

Deputy Director-General Research and Development (formerly General Manager Research and Development), Kevin O'Connor

Signed

Date 23rd December 2010

Amendments

This guide may be amended at any stage:


• Search for the electronic version of this document on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/. Then check the version number on the front page of your printed copy against the version number on the electronic copy. You will be able to tell whether from this whether the Guide or the section/appendix you are referring to been amended since your copy was printed.

• To find out which section has been amended refer to the amendments table below.

If you do not have access to the Internet, contact your local DOC office to check whether your copy is the most recent version.

Amendment

date

Amendment details

DOCDM reference

Amended by

December 2010

Translocation Guide for Community Groups

One of 3 documents replacing the 2002 Translocation SOP.

DOCDM -363788

Pam Cromarty

3 May 2002 Standard Operating Procedure for the Translocation of New Zealand’s indigenous terrestrial flora and fauna (Translocation SOP).

Replaced the Transfer Guidelines.

DOCDM -251982 QD-NH1042

Pam Cromarty


http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/�

dme://DOCDM-251982/�

dme://DOCDM-251982/�


4. Getting started

You have an idea for a translocation and want to find out what is involved before you make the commitment to carry on.

4 . 1 T H E P R O C E S S T O F O L L O W

1. Contact your local DOC Area Office and find out whether you have to prepare a translocation proposal and apply for permits before you carry out your translocation.

2. If you need an approved translocation proposal, get a copy of The Information Sheet: Getting the go-ahead for a translocation.

3. Think through the questions in the ‘outline’ at the back of the Information Sheet, prepare a ‘basic outline’ of your translocation idea and present it to DOC Area Office staff.

DOC will appoint an ‘Assigned Contact Person’ for you. DOC staff will seek feedback on your idea (basic outline). The Assigned Contact Person will be with you throughout the proposal process and will arrange to inform you of:

• DOC’s assessment of the likely practicability of your basic outline

• Any aspects of the proposal DOC would look at closely if you decided to proceed

• Initial feedback from iwi affected by the outline and key stakeholders

4 . 2 U S E F U L R E S O U R C E S

1. You can find the address of your local DOC Area Office in the telephone book or on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz

2. Information on DOC’s requirements for translocations is available on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/

3. ‘The Information Sheet: Getting the Go-ahead for a Translocation’ is available from DOC Offices (DOC system document reference: DOCDM-652465) and on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/

4. ‘Assigned Contact Person’ is defined in Appendix 1: Terminology and definitions.


http://www.doc.govt.nz/�




5. Making the commitment to carry on and prepare a translocation proposal

You have let DOC staff know what you want to do and DOC has provided initial feedback on your translocation idea (basic outline). If you decide you want to continue with your translocation idea, you let DOC know and find out more about what is involved.


1. Let your Assigned Contact Person know if you want to carry on with your translocation idea.

2. Arrange with your Assigned Contact Person to be briefed on:

• The likely level of support DOC will provide for the project and to discuss your expectations

• Whether DOC will support you in carrying out consultation with iwi affected by the proposal

• Which iwi groups to consult with and how, and who to inform

• The Treaty Settlement Legislation and Protocols affecting your proposal

• Contact information for key stakeholders that are to be contacted at various stages of the processes (e.g. DOC Area Managers and Area Offices for the source and release sites, your Assigned Contact Person, Recovery Group Leader and community groups that participate in management of the source and release sites

• Land status of the source and release areas

• Whether your basic outline meets the legal requirements

• The types of approvals and/or permits required—which are covered by your translocation proposal and which must be applied for separately

• The processing cost and time for your proposal and associated approvals and/or permits. Information on how to apply for a waiver or reduction of fees

• Information you will be required to provide and how your application will be processed

DOC will also provide copies of the paperwork, other relevant information and contact information for specialist advice. The paperwork and information you will need is listed in Appendix 3 Paperwork and information to use when preparing a translocation proposal.

Note:

1. A single translocation proposal can cover:


• Multiple transfers over time

• Multiple source sites

• Multiple release sites

• Multiple species

5 . 2 U S E F U L R E S O U R C E S

Various people will have experience and/or expertise in transferring your target species and can be contacted to provide advice:

• Your Assigned Contact Person will have provided you with contact details for Recovery Group leaders and DOC staff with relevant experience/knowledge.

• You can find others yourself, refer to Appendix 2 Useful websites when planning a translocation.



6. Preparing the translocation proposal and planning the translocation

You plan the translocation and prepare a translocation proposal.

Note:

The translocation proposal must be approved and permits issued before the plants or animals are transferred.


1. Use the questions and prompts in the Translocation Proposal Form and its Explanatory Notes, to plan your translocation.

2. Prepare a translocation proposal using the Translocation Proposal Form.

3. Provide justification for the translocation if significant adverse issues are identified or it appears ecologically unsound.

4. Apply for permits and Animal Ethics Committee approval if applicable (ask your Assigned Contact Person about what is required).

5. Prepare your application for waiver or reduction of the cost recovery fees.

Planning a translocation involves:

• Project management.

• Developing a budget and securing resources for all phases of the translocation from planning through to post-release monitoring and management.

• Having clear objectives and outcomes in mind.

• Finding an appropriate source population of your target species.

• Finding an appropriate release site, identifying impacts at the release site and deciding on post-release management.

• Checking the proposal is consistent with legal requirements.

• Designing a disease management protocol.

• Planning the transfer design.

• Developing a monitoring programme.

• Consulting with iwi of the source and release sites.

• Consulting with key stakeholders (e.g. landowners, community groups that participate in management of the source and release sites, Recovery Groups). This is very important and needs to begin early in the process.

• Involving the wider community/media.

• Finding out about approvals/permits and how to get them.


All of these parts of planning and preparing for a translocation can be carried out at the same time.

Level of assistance:

1. The level of assistance that DOC staff will give you during preparation of your proposal and planning for the translocation will depend on the level of support DOC indicated it would be likely to provide (see section 5).

2. The assistance provided by DOC during this stage would usually be considered a contribution in kind and would not be charged for.

3. To be sure of the level of support DOC can provide, keep in touch with your Assigned Contact Person.

6 . 2 K E Y R E S O U R C E S

1. The Translocation Proposal Form and Explanatory Notes are available from DOC Offices (DOC system document reference: DOCDM-59825 and DOCDM-774881) and on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/

2. The Explanatory Notes for the Translocation Proposal Form offers guidance on consultation and planning your translocation, and explains the information needed to complete the proposal form.

3. Worked examples of translocation proposals are available from DOC Offices (DOC system document reference: DOCDM-162939; DOCDM-176538 and DOCDM-399715) and on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/

4. Information on translocations relevant to your species/source location/release location is available on request from DOC’s Translocation Spreadsheet (DOC system document reference: DOCDM-33810). The database contains lists of translocations approved since 2002 and the reports about them. Ask your Assigned Contact Person to look them up for you.





7. Submit the translocation proposal for processing

You have prepared your translocation proposal and lodged it with DOC for processing. DOC will appoint an ‘Appointed Processor’ (see below) who will be responsible for processing your application. DOC has specified processing timeframes for this part of the process - a minimum of 70 days and a maximum of 90 days (refer to flow diagram 4 above) to aid effective and efficient processing of applications.


1. Submit your completed translocation proposal to your ‘Assigned Contact Person’ in DOC who will pass on to the person appointed to process your application (‘Appointed Processor’) for processing. Provide DOC with a paper copy and an electronic copy (if possible) of your translocation proposal.

2. Apply for a waiver or reduction of the cost recovery fees. You may be required to pay a deposit when submitting your proposal for processing.

3. Provide additional information if requested by your Appointed Processor. You have 15 working days to provide the information—unless you request an extension. Otherwise, DOC will continue the process without the information and decisions will be made on that basis.

4. Comment on the draft report and draft permits when they are sent to you by your Appointed Processor. You have 10 working days to respond—unless you request an extension. Otherwise, DOC will continue the process without your feedback and decisions will be made on that basis. You do not have to comment.

5. If your proposal is approved you will be issued with permits that you need to sign and return to your Appointed Processor within 20 working days (the permits are not valid until DOC receives signed copies). You will be sent a copy for your own records; these should be kept in a secure place.

6. Let the key stakeholders you consulted in Section 11.3 of your Translocation Proposal know whether your proposal was approved or declined. Your Appointed Processor will inform iwi affected by the proposal.

7. You may withdraw your application at any time; however, any processing fees will not be reimbursed.

Appointed Processor:

1. ‘Appointed Processor’ is defined in Appendix 1: Terminology and definitions.

2. Your Appointed Processor arranges for your translocation proposal to be checked for completeness and to ensure it has the required level of detail, within 10 working days. The Appointed Processor will let you know if any further information is required before processing can begin.


3. Your Appointed Processor sends your translocation proposal out to relevant parties, including iwi affected by the proposal, for comments and input into permit conditions. This person will also seek the concurrence of Area Managers of the source and release sites and Conservator(s) of other Conservancies affected by the translocation. 20 workings days is allowed for this stage, with an extension of 20 working days also provided for.

4. Your Appointed Processor may request additional information from you on behalf of the DOC staff assessing your translocation proposal. There is a pause in the processing time allowed for DOC staff while you provide that information (up to 15 days or more if you have requested an extension).

5. Your Appointed Processor has 25 working days to prepare a draft report and draft permits. You will be given an opportunity to comment on these. There is a pause in the processing time allowed for DOC staff while you provide feedback on the drafts (up to 10 days or more if you have requested an extension).

6. Your Appointed Processor has 10 working days to finalise the draft report and permits before sending them to the Decision Maker. The Decision Maker has 5 working days to make a decision.

A total of 70 days minimum or 90 days maximum is allowed for steps 1 – 4 above.

7. Your Appointed Processor will inform you of the Decision Maker’s decision to either approve or decline your translocation proposal.

8. If your proposal is approved, your Appointed Processor will complete the issuing of permits (which give legal permission to carry out the activities of your translocation). Processing will be complete once you have signed and returned the permits.

Notes:

1. Your Appointed Processor will discuss reporting requirements with you. This is the time to discuss and agree on:

• Timeframes

• Format

• Who you will keep informed about the results of the transfer(s) and translocation

These will be included in your permit conditions.

2. Refund policy: If DOC fails to meet the total processing timeframe, you will be refunded a percentage of your processing fee depending on the length of the delay. DOC’s refund policy is the same as councils use for resource consents: 1% per day late after the deadline, up to a maximum of 50% of the total processing fee. However, this will not apply if you have delayed the process.



8. Carrying out the transfer

Your planning and preparation are complete and you are ready to carry out the transfer. Your translocation proposal has been approved and you have obtained all the permits and approvals you need to carry out the transfer.


1. Inform iwi and key stakeholders (e.g. Area Managers of the source and release sites, your Assigned Contact Person, Recovery Group Leader, Conservation Groups involved in managing islands, etc.) at least 2 months prior to the transfer that a transfer is about to take place. This is to occur before every transfer.

2. Carry out the collection, transport and release:

• As set out in the approved translocation proposal

• In accordance with permit conditions

• In accordance with Animal Ethic Committee conditions

Unless adjustments are required while the transfer is underway to minimise stress to the target species or to respond to circumstances beyond your control.

3. Implement your disease management regime during the translocation.

4. If animals are found freshly dead or die during the transfers, follow the instructions on necropsy in your permit conditions.

5. Keep in touch with your Assigned Contact Person in DOC and work through any issues that come up during the transfer/translocation.

Iwi and community involvement:

1. Implement any iwi and community involvement, communication and media actions identified in section 11 of the approved proposal.

2. Take the necessary precautions to reduce stress on the target species during iwi and community involvement, and media events.

Note:

1. A translocation can consist of one or more transfers.

2. It is important to inform iwi and key stakeholders of transfers before you carry them out—courteous behaviour helps to maintain productive working relationships.

3. Reasons for any adjustments to the collection, transport, or release/planting of the species described in the approved translocation proposal must be sound and transparent. Keep a note of them and include them in your transfer and monitoring reports.

Return to table of contents .


9. Research, monitoring and post-release management

9 . 1 A F T E R T H E T R A N S F E R

The process to follow:

1. Carry out research, monitoring and post-release management as agreed and set out in:

• The approved proposal

• Any permits

• Animal Ethics Committee conditions

Note:

1. You will need to decide when post-release management ends and ‘routine’ management at the site begins, so that the reporting timeframes can be set. Do this when planning your translocation and post-release management.

9 . 2 P O S T - R E L E A S E A S S E S S M E N T F O R A O N E - O F F T R A N S F E R

You want to incorporate improvements or changes to monitoring or post-release management in response to the results of the transfer.


1. Evaluate the results of the transfer.

2. Request amendments to the translocation proposal and variations in permits. Send the request to your Appointed Processor in DOC.

3. Attach any approved amendments/permit variations to the approved translocation proposal.

4. Implement any approved changes.

9 . 3 R E V I E W O U T C O M E S F O R M U L T I P L E T R A N S F E R S

When a translocation proposal involves multiple transfers, after each transfer you review how the transfer went and prepare your transfer report.

If your proposal/permit requires each transfer to be approved separately, you apply to DOC for approval to carry out the next transfer. DOC decides whether the next transfer should:

• Proceed as planned


• Proceed with modified transfer design and/or targets, monitoring or post-release management

• Not proceed

If all transfers were approved at the start you only need to apply to DOC if the operational targets were not met or there are major problems. Refer below to Note 1.


1. Prepare a transfer and/or monitoring report and send it to your Appointed Processor in DOC (covered in more detail below in Section 10: Reporting); if appropriate, request amendments to the transfer design and/or targets, monitoring or post-release management and seek approval from DOC to carry out the next transfer. If the changes you are requesting significantly alter the approved proposal (e.g. change of source site), there may be a need for further consultation with iwi and other stakeholders.

2. Attach any approved amendments/permits to the approved translocation proposal.

3. Implement any approved changes.

Note:

1. In some cases where the translocation techniques for the species are well established and there are no uncertainties about the release site or the experience of the team undertaking the translocation, the Decision Maker may have approved all of the transfers from the start. However, if operational targets are not met or there are major problems with any of the transfers, approval must be obtained for subsequent transfers and any amendments.

For example, if 20 lizards were transferred and 10 died during the transfer, the transfer methods would obviously need to be reviewed. Changes to the methods, and the next transfer, would have to be approved.

2. One year of poor success might not mean that methods should be changed—any changes will depend on the causes of failure.

For example, if a target of ‘90% of transferred birds survive the first month after transfer’ is not reached because an unpredicted and severe storm hits the release site a week after the transfer, and only 60% of the birds survive, there might not be any practical changes that need to be made to future transfer methods because the storm was considered an unseasonal event.



10. Reporting

You put together a report on how the transfer went and how the overall translocation is going. You pass on this information to DOC and other relevant people including iwi affected by the proposal.

Reporting assists you to:

• Review how the transfer(s) went

• Build up a good picture over time of the results and outcomes of the translocation

• Share the results and outcomes of the transfers/translocation—so others can learn from your experience and improve the chance of success of future translocations

• Identify information gaps that could be attended to in future translocations

1 0 . 1 T Y P E S O F R E P O R T

Two types of reports need to be prepared:

• Transfer report

• Monitoring report

1. A transfer report provides an account of:

• The collection, holding, transport and release of the species

• Lessons learnt during the transfer

• Recommendations for future transfers

The transfer report is usually due within 2 months after the transfer is completed, unless otherwise negotiated when the translocation proposal was approved.

2. A monitoring report provides a full account of

• Results of the post-release monitoring undertaken

• Evaluation of the results

• Lessons learnt from the translocation

• Recommendations for adjustments to the management regime

• Information gaps that could be attended to in future translocations

• Recommendations for future translocations

Monitoring reports must be produced annually where the monitoring programme is ongoing. A monitoring report is usually due within 2 months of the monitoring programme coming to an end, unless otherwise negotiated when the translocation proposal was approved.


When setting the timeframes for completing the reports at the time the permits were issued, the Appointed Processor will have checked with you what dates and timeframes are realistic for you.

Sometimes it will be logical to combine the transfer and monitoring reports into one report—this is usually when the monitoring is done immediately after the transfer.

1 0 . 2 T H E P R O C E S S T O F O L L O W

1. Prepare transfer and monitoring reports by the dates provided in section 17 of your approved proposal, and send to your Appointed Processor in DOC.

2. Get in touch with your Appointed Processor in DOC if you find you cannot meet the due dates.

3. Use the current version of the reporting instructions (refer below to key resources).

• If you want to do the report in a different format, (e.g. the report is part of a post-graduate research project or a published paper), get agreement for that at the time your translocation is approved. The report must cover the topics described in the reporting instructions (summary, methods, results, discussion).

4. Complete all sections of the report, covering all the information required in the instructions:

• In the transfer report, explain any adjustments made in carrying out the collection, transport, and release; where these are different to what is described in the approved translocation proposal.

• Provide DOC with a paper copy and an electronic copy (if possible) of your report.

• The reports are recorded in the Translocation Spreadsheet, which is a DOC database of all translocations approved since 2002. The information in the spreadsheet is available to people on request, and is a useful tool to help DOC staff and others learn about and plan translocations.

5. As well as sending the report to your Appointed Processor, you need to communicate the results of the transfers/translocation to those you agreed you would keep informed. This is likely to include:

• DOC officers involved in the translocation

• Your Assigned Contact Person

• The Recovery Group for the species—where one exists

• Iwi of the source and release sites

• Community groups involved at the source and release sites

Note: use your reports to make summaries of how things went to keep iwi and others informed.

6. Send summary information on your transfers/translocation to the NZ Reintroductions Database manager 1

1 NZ Reintroductions Database manager. Find at:

:

http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/nz/ (Viewed 3 June 2010).

http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/nz/�


• Information in the NZ Reintroductions Database1 is available to community groups and others.

• You need to send the information yourself, as you will be listed as the contact person for the translocation when it is included on the website for this database.

• Send the following sections from the transfer/monitoring reports:

• The information table at the start of the report

• Section 1. Summary.

7. Send the results of any disease testing you did to the DOC Wildlife Health Coordinator for inclusion in the National Wildlife Health Database. For the address and further information about the database, visit the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/conservation/threats-and-impacts/wildlife-health/national-wildlife-health-database-project/.

1 0 . 3 K E Y R E S O U R C E S

1. The Reporting Instructions are available from DOC Offices (DOC system document reference: DOCDM-166659) and on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/

2. Worked examples of reports are available from DOC Offices (DOC system document references: DOCDM-165359; DOCDM-632593; DOCDM-629927) and on the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/


http://www.doc.govt.nz/conservation/threats-and-impacts/wildlife-health/national-wildlife-health-database-project/�

http://www.doc.govt.nz/conservation/threats-and-impacts/wildlife-health/national-wildlife-health-database-project/�




11. Acknowledgements

Pam Cromarty and Rose Collen prepared these guidelines and supporting documents with the help of many people.

Special thanks to:

• Representatives from community groups and other organisations, including: Doug Armstrong, Gay Blunden, Kevin Evans, Sandra Jack, Ian Jamieson, Tim Lovegrove, Chris Rance, Jo Ritchie, Pauline Stephinson, who provided feedback on the original SOP and input into the draft documents

• Annie Wheeler (Community Outreach Officer, Marketing and Communications Group) for re-writing the consultation, communications and community involvement section

• Pam Crisp (Education Advisor, Education and Community Outreach, Marketing Unit), Lynn Adams (Biodiversity Technical Support Officer Wellington), Oliver Overdyck (Biodiversity Technical Support Officer Waikato), Andrea Booth (Biodiversity Technical Support Officer Northland) for input into criteria for waiver/reduction of cost recovery fees

• Evaan Aramakutu (Kaihautu Kahui Kura Taiao), Kara Edwards (Pou Kura Taiao West Coast), Wendy Evans (Senior Policy Analyst, Policy Negotiations) and Rachel Puentener (Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu) for input into the sections on working with iwi.

• All those who have provided input and feedback into the material that make up the guide and its supporting documents, including Technical Support Officers Biodiversity, Ian Flux (Scientific Officer, Threats Science Group), Rod Hitchmough (Scientific Officer (Threatened Species), Ecosystems and Species Unit), Jorge Santos (Technical Support Supervisor Motukarara Nursery)

• Briony Dyson (Senior Technical Support Officer – Concessions) and Andrew MacPherson (Solicitor, Legal Services Section) for suggesting major re-ordering of material

• Jenn Falconer for design work on the Information Sheet: Getting the go-ahead for a translocation

• For user testing the Guide: Community group representatives Chris Smuts-Kennedy (Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust), Paula Williams (Project Kiwi Trust), Hester Cooper (Supporters of Tiritiri Matangi Island), Viv Shaw (Pomona Island Trust); and iwi for northern and southern regions Clive Stone (Ngati Wai) and Pachel Peutener (Te Runanga O Ngai Tahu), plus Paula Wilson (Community Relations Officer Iwi Relationships Northland)

The translocation proposal worked examples were based on information provided by the original proposal writers: Shaun O’Connor, Rose Collen (shore plover example), James Reardon (grand and Otago skink proposal) and Judy Gilbert, Tim Lovegrove (NI robin example).



12. References

DOC (Department of Conservation) 2003: Captive Management Policy. Department of Conservation. 12 p. (DOC system document reference OLDDM-781413) http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/MultiPageDocumentTOC.aspx?id=41512 (Viewed 28 June 2010)

DOC (Department of Conservation) 2008: Captive Management Standard Operating Procedure. Research and Development Group, Wellington. 54 p. (DOC system document reference DOCDM-266180)

DOC (Department of Conservation) 2010: Wildlife Health Management Standard Operating Procedure. Banding and Wildlife Health Section, Department of Conservation. (DOC system document reference DOCDM-442078)

IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) 1987: IUCN Position Statement on Translocation of Living Organisms. http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/transe.htm (viewed 28 March 2012).

IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) 1995: IUCN/SSC Guidelines For Re-Introductions. Prepared by the SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Approved by the 41st Meeting of the IUCN Council, Gland Switzerland, May 1995. http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/reinte.htm (viewed 28 March 2012).

Jakob-Hoff, R. 2000: Translocation Health Management Workbook. Revised January 2004. Prepared for Department of Conservation, Wellington. (DOC system document reference DOCDM-54393)

Lee, W.; McGlone, M.; Wright, E. (Comps) 2005: Biodiversity inventory and monitoring: a review of national and international systems and a proposed framework for future biodiversity monitoring by the Department of Conservation. Lincoln, New Zealand. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0405/122, prepared for the Department of Conservation. 213 p.

NZ Reintroductions Database http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/nz/ (Viewed 3 June 2010).

Townsend, A.J.; de Lange, P.J.; Duffy, C.A.J.; Miskelly, C.M.; Molloy, J.; Norton, D.A. 2008: New Zealand Threat Classification System manual. Department of Conservation, Wellington. http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-technical/sap244.pdf (Viewed 28 March 2012).

Wildlife Act 1953 http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1953/0031/latest/DLM276814.html (viewed 12 March 2012).


http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/about-doc/role/policies-and-plans/captive-management-policy/�

http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/MultiPageDocumentTOC.aspx?id=41512�

http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/transe.htm�

http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/reinte.htm�


http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-technical/sap244.pdf�


http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1953/0031/latest/DLM276814.html�


Appendix 1

T E R M I N O L O G Y A N D D E F I N I T I O N S

AnimalIncludes mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and invertebrates.

Animal Ethics Committee (AEC)The AEC’s role is to consider and approve applications for use of animals in research, testing and teaching; monitor compliance with project approvals; and ensure that appropriate welfare standards are established and maintained. AECs are established by organisations and individuals that use animals for research, testing and teaching.

ApplicantThe community group, individual or other organisation applying to DOC for approval to carry out a translocation.

Applicationincludes the translocation proposal, processing fee and/or request for waiver or reduction of cost recovery fees.

Appointed Processorthe DOC staff member responsible for processing a translocation application from the time it is lodged by the Applicant for processing, through the decision making and post-release reporting phases. Note this is a different person to the ‘Assigned Contact Person’.

Aquatic lifeAny species of plant or animal life (except birds) that must, at any time of the life history of the species, inhabit freshwater; including any part of such plant or animal. (Definition from Conservation Act 1987.)

Areais described in the section below on Department of Conservation.

Area ManagerThis position in DOC is responsible for leading the Area and supporting the Conservator to deliver conservation outcomes that increase the value of conservation to New Zealanders.

Assigned Contact Persona DOC staff member assigned to:

• Be a consistent contact person for each Applicant throughout development of the translocation proposal and beyond

• Guide the Applicant through the process of developing a translocation proposal to the point where it is lodged for processing

• Help the Applicant contact and engage with specialist staff in DOC staff e.g. Recovery Group leaders

Note this is a different person to the ‘Appointed Processor’.

CaptivityAny situation where wildlife is or is potentially prevented from escape, and where regular and frequent management intervention (e.g. feeding, animal health maintenance) is required to maintain animal health and welfare.

ConcurrenceAgreement in opinion.

Conservancyis described in the section below on Department of Conservation.


Data deficient 2

Decision Makerthe DOC manager who has the delegation to grant or decline the permits for the translocation proposal being considered (this varies and is listed in DOC’s Instrument of Delegations).

Certain criteria and/or definitions must be met for a taxon to be listed in a threat category. Where information is so lacking that an assessment is not possible, the taxon is assigned to the ‘Data Deficient’ category (Townsend et al. 2008).

Department of Conservation (DOC)DOC is a decentralised organisation with its National Office in Wellington and 11 conservancy offices located throughout New Zealand. DOC's responsibilities are captured in its Māori name Te Papa Atawhai. Te papa signifies a box or container (for taonga/treasures) and atawhai is the act of caring, nurturing or preserving. DOC has a leading role in conservation work that contributes to our prosperity. The conservancy office's main role is to ensure quality conservation management in the conservancy (or region) it manages. For management purposes each conservancy is divided into several areas (each of which has an area office) that deliver conservation outputs for the region.

Ecological regionsThese have been described and mapped, and the records are held in DOC libraries. For further information ask your DOC Assigned Contact Person.

Ecological integritya measure of ‘healthy functioning state’. Ecosystems and communities have high ecological integrity when all the indigenous plants and animals typical of a place are present, together with the key ecosystem processes and features that sustain functional relationships between all these components (Lee et al. 2005).

Criteria for high ecological integrity:

Assess whether the release site meets criteria 1–3 or 4 in Lee et al. 2005.

1. Ecosystem Structure

Ecosystem structure is intact when:

• All plant size classes of known or expected native dominant species are represented for the ecosystem type, i.e. what should be there is there and in the expected abundance, including palatable species

2. Ecosystem function

Natural biotic processes which are fundamental for the ecosystem’s persistence are currently occurring, e.g. indigenous seed pollinators and dispersers are present in sufficient numbers to ensure species maintenance

3. Nativeness and native dominance

• The ecosystem has a high proportion of native vascular plants; native species are dominant.

• The cover of native plant species is greater than 95%.

• Exotic species are benign or having a low impact.

• The site is intentionally being managed towards high ecological integrity.

2 Threat categories as described in the NZ Threat Classification System Manual (Townshend et al 2008: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/conservation/nz-threat-classification-system/nz-threat-classification-system-manual-2008/ (Viewed 26 March 2012). The Manual and the NZ Threat Classification Lists can all be found on the DOC intranet: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/conservation/nz-threat-classification-system/ (Viewed 28 March 2012).



http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/conservation/nz-threat-classification-system/nz-threat-classification-system-manual-2008/�

http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/conservation/nz-threat-classification-system/nz-threat-classification-system-manual-2008/�

http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/conservation/nz-threat-classification-system/�


• All introduced threats have been removed (or are being mitigated to desirable levels) or are naturally diminishing as a result of successional processes.

E.g. Southeast Island (Rangatira) in the Chatham Islands: the island has been managed in recent times (10-20 years) as if it were had high ecological integrity, even though there was significant removal of vegetation and it was farmed in the past.

Return to

ExoticUsed to refer to species of plants or animals introduced from another country.

Section 1.7 Do I need an approved translocation proposal flow diagrams

IntroductionThe intentional release or accidental dispersal by human agency of a living organism outside its known range, i.e. release to a site that the species has never been before. The intentional release for the purpose of conservation is also known as conservation introduction (based on the definition in the 1987 IUCN position statement on translocations. 3

IUCNInternational Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Also referred to as the World Conservation Union. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental network, helping the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges.

)

Iwito deonte the groupings in English, the iwi had been termed tribe and the hapü as sub-tribe. Iwi like tangata whenua, can be used in a generic sense to mean people generally ……… more specifically, however, and in the context of iwi/hapü/whänau, it refers to the tribe. The interpretation of iwi depends on the context in which the term is used (DOC 2000).

Nationally criticalError! Bookmark not defined.

• Very small population; or

• Small population with a high ongoing or predicted decline; or

• Population with a very high ongoing or predicted decline.

Nationally endangeredError! Bookmark not defined.

• Small population that has a low to high ongoing or predicted decline; or

• Small stable population (unnatural); or

• Moderate population with high ongoing or predicted decline.

Nationally vulnerableError! Bookmark not defined.

• Small, increasing population (unnatural); or

• Moderate, stable population (unnatural); or

• Moderate population with population trend that is declining; or

• Moderate to large population & moderate to high ongoing or predicted decline; or

• Large population and high ongoing or predicted decline.

Operational targetsTargets are stepping stones to achieving the conservation outcome. Setting targets allows the success of the project to be measured. They are usually set annually and they are the intermediate results the project is aiming to achieve each year.

3 IUCN 1987: IUCN Position Statement on Translocation of Living Organisms. http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/transe.htm (viewed 28 March 2012).

http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/transe.htm�


Previous rangeThe previous distribution of a species including:

• The documented distribution of a species from historically recorded sources.

• The inferred post-glacial range of a species prior to documented recording. This may include archaeological and sub-fossil evidence.

Re-introductionThe intentional movement of an organism into part of its known historic or prehistoric range from which it has disappeared or become locally extinct. Also referred to as re-establishment (based on the definition in the 1987 IUCN position statement on translocations.3)

Release siteThe release site is the spatial area where the transfer population is to be released (i.e. the transfer destination).

Restoration planA ‘Restoration Plan’ addesses the following issues:

• The restoration objective/goal for the site

• Threats that are likely to limit the success of the restoration project

• How the restoration will be planned to avoid restriction of future options

• Ecological appropriateness and eco-sourcing (to avoid disrupting natural vegetation patterns and genetic integrity of local varieties)

• Risk of overharvesting the source population (if threatened)

• How biosecurity risks are managed (e.g. associated with moving soil on plants)

Return to Section 1.5 Which translocations do not require a translocation proposal

Source populationThe source population is the group of individuals that includes the transfer population prior to the transfer.

SpeciesThe term ‘species’ is used in a descriptive sense in this guide and has been defined to include any taxonomic unit at or below species level.

SOPStandard Operating Procedure

SupplementationAddition of individuals where the species already exists at the release site. Also referred to as enhancement, re-enforcement, re-stocking, enrichment or augmentation (based on the definition in the 1995 IUCN guidelines on re-introductions 4

TaongaTreasure, a cherished belonging.

).

TaxonFor the purposes of the New Zealand Manual (Townsend et al. 2008), a taxon (plural taxa) comprises not only any formally named rank below Family but also any biological entity as yet without a formal name.

ThreatenedError! Bookmark not defined.Any taxa classed as ‘threatened’ according to the New Zealand Threat Classification System (Townsend et al. 2008). Threatened taxa are grouped into three categories: Nationally Critical, Nationally Endangered and Nationally Vulnerable.

TransferThe part of the translocation that is physically moving the plant or animal from one location to another, and its subsequent release or planting at the new site.

Transfer populationThe group of individuals (of a species) transferred to the release site.

4 IUCN 1995: IUCN/SSC Guidelines For Re-Introductions. Prepared by the SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Approved by the 41st Meeting of the IUCN Council, Gland Switzerland, May 1995. http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/reinte.htm (viewed 28 March 2012).


http://iucnsscrsg.org/pages/1/index.htm�

http://iucnsscrsg.org/pages/1/index.htm�

http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/reinte.htm�


TranslocationTranslocation is defined in this guide as the managed movement of live plants or animals (taonga) from one location to another. Translocation covers the entire process including planning, the transfer, release, monitoring and post-release management (up to some predetermined end point). A translocation can consist of one or more transfers. (Note that this definition varies from that used in the 1987 IUCN position statement on translocations3, and the 1995 IUCN guidelines on re-introductions.4)

Translocation Proposal FormThe form used in conjunction with this guide. It acts as an application form for the translocation and most of the permits required by DOC.

Varietal provenanceRefers to when a species’ genetic profile is known across its full range, allowing local races to be described (taxonomically) and their distribution defined (measured and mapped).

Return to

WildlifeDefined in the

Section 1.7 Do I need an approved translocation proposal flow diagrams

Wildlife Act 1953 as ‘Any animal that is living in a wild state; and includes any such animal or egg or offspring of any such animal held or hatched or born in captivity, whether pursuant to an authority granted under this Act or otherwise; but does not include any species specified in the Sixth Schedule to this Act (being animals that are wild animals subject to the Wild Animal Control Act 1977)’.




Appendix 2

U S E F U L W E B S I T E S W H E N P L A N N I N G A T R A N S L O C A T I O N

Last updated 25 July 2012

Website Link Comments

Department of Conservation

http://www.doc.govt.nz

Information on the Department http://www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/

Office addresses http://www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/structure/offices/

DOC science publications http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/

Captive management policy http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/about-doc/role/policies-and-plans/captive-management-policy/

Applying to hold protected wildlife in captivity http://www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/concessions-and-permits/protected-wildlife-in-captivity/

Translocation information—will shortly be available under ‘Publications’on the website

Journal of Ecology

http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/

The New Zealand (NZ) Journal of Ecology is a biannual peer-reviewed journal publishing ecological research relevant to NZ/Aotearoa and the South Pacific.

Nature Space Ecological Restoration in Aotearoa

http://www.naturespace.org.nz/

Nature Space is a website for groups, individuals and landowners undertaking ecological restoration in NZ

New Zealand Plant Conservation Network

http://www.nzpcn.org.nz/

Network members collaborate to protect and restore NZ’s indigenous plant life and their natural habitats and associated species

Another way to find contact people for threatened plant translocations

Information and guidelines for plant restoration projects



http://www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/�

http://www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/structure/offices/�




http://www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/concessions-and-permits/protected-wildlife-in-captivity/�

http://www.doc.govt.nz/about-doc/concessions-and-permits/protected-wildlife-in-captivity/�

http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/�

http://www.nzes.org.nz/nzje/�

http://www.naturespace.org.nz/�



http://www.nzpcn.org.nz/�




New Zealand Bird Resources−Ornithological Society of New Zealand

http://www.bird.org.nz/

Provides information on the Ornithological Society of New Zealand's recently completed Atlas Scheme, as well as the NZ Recognised Bird Names (NZRBN) database.

Notornis−Ornithology of the Southern Pacific

http://www.notornis.org.nz/

Notornis is a peer-reviewed journal publishing ornithological research relevant to NZ and the South Pacific. The journal is published by the Ornithological Society of NZ (OSNZ).

Reintroduction specialist group Oceania section

http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/

Home page for The Reintroduction Specialist Group (RSG), which is part of the Species Survival Commission (SSC), which is in turn part of The World Conservation Union (IUCN). The site has extensive information on reintroductions in Oceania including NZ, Australia and South Pacific.

Has links to the reintroduction projects in NZ and reintroduction contact people – refer to the next two rows.

Reintroduction projects in New Zealand

http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/nz

Database of re-introduction projects in NZ

Database coordinators: Stuart Parsons (Auckland University), Doug Armstrong (Massey University)

Reintroduction contact people in Oceania

http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/advice/

Information on people to contact for information on reintroductions in Oceania.

Sanctuaries of New Zealand network

http://www.sanctuariesnz.org/

Website provides information to those engaged in managing biodiversity sanctuaries in NZ, and promotes these sanctuaries to those interested in learning how they are contributing to NZ biodiversity restoration, or those who may wish to visit them

The Sanctuaries of New Zealand is an informal network of biodiversity sanctuaries that share common goals and approaches in their efforts to restore NZ’s special biodiversity

Sources of funding

Funding Information Service http://www.fis.org.nz

Information on a range of funding sources.

http://www.bird.org.nz/�

http://www.bird.org.nz/�

http://www.notornis.org.nz/�

http://www.notornis.org.nz/�

http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/�






mailto:[email protected]�

mailto:[email protected]�

http://rsg-oceania.squarespace.com/advice/�



http://www.sanctuariesnz.org/�

http://www.sanctuariesnz.org/�

http://www.fis.org.nz/�

http://www.fis.org.nz/�



Ministry for the Environment−sources of funding for projects and participation

http://www.mfe.govt.nz/withyou/funding/index.html

Information about funds that the Ministry for the Environment manage, and funding from other government departments.

New Zealand Plant Conservation Network−sources of funding

http://www.nzpcn.org.nz - click on Conservation > Funding

Information on sources of funding available to people involved in plant conservation

The information provided on the website includes international, national and regional funding agencies and trusts


http://www.mfe.govt.nz/withyou/funding/index.html�






Appendix 3

P A P E R W O R K A N D I N F O R M A T I O N T O U S E W H E N P R E P A R I N G A T R A N S L O C A T I O N P R O P O S A L

The following documents are available:

• From your local DOC office. You may want to ask for electronic copies of them.

• On the DOC website: http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/.

The DOC system document reference number for each document is in brackets.

Outline, Translocation Proposal Form, Explanatory Notes and worked examples

1. Outline of a translocation proposal:

• Can be provided as part of the Information Sheet: Getting the Go-ahead for a Translocation (DOCDM-652465), or as a Word version (DOCDM-382549)

• Two worked examples of an outline (DOCDM-158349)

2. Translocation Proposal Form (DOCDM-59825)

3. Explanatory Notes for the Translocation Proposal Form (DOCDM-774881)

4. Worked examples of a translocation proposal:

• Worked example 1−shore plovers translocation proposal from captivity to wild (a Department of Conservation (DOC) proposal) (DOCDM-162939)

• Worked example 2−grand and Otago skinks from wild to captivity (a Department of Conservation (DOC) proposal) (DOCDM-176538)

• Worked example 3−North Island robins translocation proposal from wild to wild (a community group proposal) (DOCDM-399715)

Other information

1. Wildlife Health Management Standard Operating Procedure (DOC 2010)(DOCDM-442078)

2. Translocation Disease Management Process (comprises two parts):

• Disease Risk Assessment Tool (DOCDM-655538)

• Translocation Health Management Workbook (DOCDM-54393)

3. Translocation Spreadsheet (DOCDM-33810):

• Contains information on approved translocation proposals and reports relating to translocations.

• Ask your Assigned Contact Person in DOC to look up translocations relevant to your species/source location/release location on the spreadsheet.



4. Contact information for people who could provide technical advice, such as Recovery Group leaders, other community groups that have done translocations.

5. Extracts from DOC Management Plans, Species Recovery Plans and Captive Management Plans relevant to your translocation.

Reporting instructions and example reports

1. Reporting instructions for 2011 Translocation SOPs/Guide (DOCDM-166659)

2. Reporting example 1—Shore plover transfer and monitoring report (DOCDM-165359)

3. Reporting example 2—North Island robin transfer report (DOCDM-632593)

4. Reporting example 3—North Island robin monitoring report (DOCDM-629927)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Documents

Translocation guide for community groups › ... › translocation › guide-for-community-gro… · The guide also applies to some translocations of indigenous land plants (refer