Upload
sbajia02
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
1/43
Transmission Line model
Sanjeev Yadav
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
2/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
3/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
4/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
5/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
6/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
7/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
8/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
9/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
10/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
11/43
Transmission line model
The rectangular patch antenna is very probably the
most popular Microstrip antenna design implemented
by designers.
Fig-1 shows the geometry of this antenna type A rectangular metal patch of width W=a and length
l=b is separated by a dielectric material from a
ground plane by a distance h.
The two ends of the antenna (located at 0 and b) can
be viewed as radiating due to fringing field along
each edge of width W(=a).
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
12/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
13/43
The two radiated edges are separated by a distance
l(=b).
The two edges along the sides of length l are often
referred to as non-radiating edges. The two analysis methods for rectangular Microstrip
antennas which are most popular for CAD
implementation are transmission line model and the
cavity model.
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
14/43
The transmission line model provides a very lucid
conceptual picture of the simple implementation of
rectangular Microstrip patch antenna .
In this model the rectangular Microstrip antennas
consists of a Microstrip transmission line with a pair
of loads at either end.
As presented in fig-2-2a the resistive loads at each
end of the transmission line represent loss due to
radiation .
At resonance, the imaginary components of the inputimpedance seen at the driving point cancel, and
therefore becomes exclusively real.
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
15/43
The driving point or feed point of an antenna is the location on an
antenna is the location on an antenna where a transmission line is
attached to provide the antenna with a source of microwave power. The impedance measured at the point where the antenna is connected
to the transmission line is called the driving point impedance or input
impedance.
The driving point Zdrv at any point along the center line of a rectangular
micro strip antenna can be computed using transmission line model .
The transmission line model is most easily represented mathematically
using the transmission line equation written in term of admittances as
presented in equation.
)tan(
)tan(
LjYY
LjYYYY
Lo
oL
oin
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
16/43
Yin is the input admittance at the end of a transmission line of
length L(=b),where has a characteristic admittance of Yo ,and a
phase constant of terminated with a complex load admittance
Y.
In other words ,the Microstrip antenna is modeled as a
Microstrip transmission line of width W(=a),which determines
the characteristic admittance ,and of physical length L(=b) and
loaded at both ends by an edge admittance Ye which models
the radiation loss. This is shown in fig-2.2(a).
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
17/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
18/43
Using the eq-1, the driving point admittance Ydrv=1/Zdrv at a
driving point between two radiating edges is expressed as:
Ye is the complex admittance at each radiating edge which
consist of a edge conductance and edge susceptance Be inthe eqn given below.
Ye = Ge +j Be3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
19/43
Approximate values of Ge and Be are
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
20/43
The fringing field extension normalized to the
substrate thickness h is
)8.0/)(258.0(
)264.0/)(3.0(412.0
hW
hW
h
l
e
e
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
21/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
22/43
Fig-present four common methods used to directly feed aMicrostrip antenna.
The first method is often called coaxial probe feed fig-3(a) the outershield of a coaxial transmission line is connected to the groundplane of Microstrip antenna.
Metal is removed from the ground plane which is generally thesame radius as the inside of coaxial shield .
The coaxial center conductor then passes through the dielectricsubstrate of patch antenna and connects to patch .
Feeding the antenna in the center(i.e. at a/2) suppresses theexcitation of a mode along the width of the antenna .
This feed symmetry enforces the purest linear polarization alongthe length of patch which can be achieved with a single direct feed.
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
23/43
The second feed method shown in fig- 3(b) drives the
antenna with a Microstrip transmission line along a
non-radiating edge. This feed method is modeled in an identical manner
to the coaxial probe feed when using the transmission
line model ;in practice , it can often to excite a mode
along the width of patch when a=b and cause antennato elliptical polarization.
The advantage of this feed method is that it allows
one to use a 50 micro strip transmission line
connected directly to a 50 driving point impedance
which eliminates the need for impedance matching.
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
24/43
The third feed method of fig-3(c)is to derive the antenna at one
of its radiating edges with a Microstrip transmission line.
This disturbs the field distribution along one radiating edge
which causes slight changes in the radiation pattern. The impedance of a typical resonant rectangular (a
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
25/43
A fourth feed method illustrated in fig-2.3(d) is to cut a
narrow notch out of a radiating edge far enough into patch
to locate a 50 driving point impedance .
The removal of the notch perturbs the patch fields slightly
,but the transmission line model generally predicts a drivingpoint location which is close to measurement.
One can increase the patch width, which increases the edge
conductance ,until at resonance ,the edge impedance is 50
Microstrip line at a radiating edge.
The patch width is large enough in this case to increase the
antenna gain considerably.
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
26/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
27/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
28/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
29/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
30/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
31/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
32/43
Methods of Analysis The MSA generally has a two-dimensional radiating patch on a thin dielectric
substrate and therefore may be categorized as a two-dimensional planar
component for analysis purposes. The analysis methods for MSAs can be
broadly divided into two groups.
In the first group, the methods are based on equivalent magnetic current
distribution around the patch edges (similar to slot antennas). There are
three popular analytical techniques:
The transmission line model;
The cavity model;
The MNM.
In the second group, the methods are based on the electric current
distribution on the patch conductor and the ground plane (similar to dipole
antennas, used in conjunction with full-wave simulation/numerical analysis
methods). Some of the numerical methods for analyzing MSAs are listed as
follows:
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
33/43
The method of moments (MoM);
The finite-element method (FEM);
The spectral domain technique (SDT);
The finite-difference time domain (FDTD)
method.
This section briefly describes these methods. 1.4.1
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
34/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
35/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
36/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
37/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
38/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
39/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
40/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
41/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
42/43
3/11/2012 [email protected]
8/2/2019 Transmission Line Model Sanjeev
43/43