10
Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data Transmission TI Precision Labs Ethernet Prepared by Rodrigo Natal Presented by Nicholaus Malone 1

Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data Transmission TI Precision Labs – Ethernet

Prepared by Rodrigo Natal

Presented by Nicholaus Malone

1

Page 2: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

25-Gbps retimer Tx output equalization

2

Pre-cursor ratio (in dB) = Rpre = 20 x log10 (v3 ⁄v2 )

Post-cursor ratio (in dB) = Rpst = 20 x log10 (v1 ⁄v2 )

Pre-cursor Post-cursor

Page 3: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

25-Gbps retimer Tx output equalization

3

FIR block diagram

• Three-tap finite impulse response (FIR)

filter, in line with IEEE 802.3

• Allows for both pre-cursor and post-

cursor equalization

• Output consists of a weighted sum of

three consecutive retimed bits, each

affecting the output amplitude

• Used to pre-distort the Tx waveform, to

compensate for frequency-dependent

loss in the output channel

Page 4: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

25-Gbps operation requires transmitter optimization

• Blue trace: 10G SFP system design top port

• Light blue trace: SFP system design bottom port

• Green trace: 28G SFP system design top port

• Red trace: 28G SFP system design bottom port

SFP Module Compliance Board

Cage/Connector

Electrical Lo

op

pack

Mo

du

le

Network Analyzer

Port 1 Port 3

TD+ TD- RD+ RD-

Port 2 Port 4

Test setup

SFP -> Small-form factor pluggable

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_form-factor_pluggable_transceiver

Frequency (GHz)

Sd

d1

2 (

dB

)

4

Page 5: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

• PCB channels behave less ideally at higher frequency, due to parasitic effects

• Parasitics (inductive or capacitive) lead to:

o Impedance mismatch (Z ≠ RL)

o Coupling between adjacent data channels (crosstalk impedance parameters ZXTALK1 and ZXTALK2)

• These effects result in signal reflections and crosstalk

Major impairments: reflection and cross talk

5

Page 6: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

• Impedance mismatch appears as ripple on insertion loss plot

• Ripple is greater at ~12.5GHz and above

Major impairments: reflection and cross talk

6

Page 7: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

Normalized pulse response for 25-Gbps rate -8 dB channel loss Normalized pulse response for 10-Gbps rate -8 dB channel loss

No pre-cursor ISI Post-cursor ISI

• Post-cursor inter-symbol interference (ISI) equates to the transmission channel’s insertion loss

• Pre-cursor ISI is a second order dispersion effect not from loss. It is typically near zero for most

10-Gbps PCB channels

• Pre-cursor ISI is significant for 25-Gbps applications and must be compensated for in most

25-Gbps links to ensure adequate bit error rate margin

Post-cursor ISI Pre-cursor ISI

More pre-cursor dispersion at 25G versus 10G

7

Page 8: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

Eye diagrams comparison after ~6-dB loss media

8

No FIR pre- or post-applied FIR pre- and post-applied

Eye height = 331.8 mV Eye height = 457.2mV

Page 9: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data

Short quiz

9

• Which FIR tap best helps to compensate for insertion loss?

– Pre-cursor

– Post-cursor

– Both

• Pre-cursor dispersion is higher at lower data rates

– True

– False

• Which signal impairment(s) is usually worse at 25Gbps than 10Gbps for a given channel?

– Insertion loss

– Crosstalk

– Reflections

– All of the above

Page 10: Transmitter Optimization for 25-Gbps Ethernet Data