1
idencies. If academicians in emergency medicine are to ~chieve recognition and acceptance by the traditional specialties, then quality research (with its accompanying ~derstanding of values) needs to be demonstrated by those who are involved in emergency medicine academic programs. Including the thought processes and scientific studies of medical disciplines, involved with treating the emergency patient but outside the sphere of the pre- defined field of emergency medicine, will allow more rapid evolution toward the ultimate recognition by the academic community of this specialty. Although individuals who have committed themselves to fall-time practice of emergency medicine have given highest priority to departmental recognition of this spe- cialty and its accompanying board examination, perhaps a higher priority ought to be the commitment to subject- ing academic thought and research projects to peer re- view in a national forum. Such exposure requires courage typical of pioneers. The 8th Annual Meeting of the University Association for Emergency Medicine will be held in San Francisco at the Hyatt on Union Square May 18, 19, and 20, 1978. The call for abstracts and the abstract deadline are an- nounced on page 485. The titles of 15 excellent research projects have already been reported to the program chairman. What price commitment? Commitment requires in- volvement, involvement requires courage, courage re- quires commitment. This has been a pivotal year for UA/EM, and we are all now committed to an exciting, progressive and evolutionary future. Joseph Waeckerle, MD, of Kansas City and I will serve as program cochairmen for the 1978 scientific meeting of UA/EM. It is not too early to now send abstracts to Dr. Waeckerle, c/o the UA/EM Headquarters, 3900 Capital City Boulevard, Lansing, Michigan 48906. Kenneth L. Mattox, MD (Dr. Mattox is assistant professor of surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Cora and Webb Mading Department of Surgery, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas and UA/EM Program Committee chairman.) Trauma Service and Emergency Medicine ~VEN WITHIN THE AREAS of "classical specialty," there is a need for a service that can cross the artificial divisions within medicine established over the years for a variety of reasons, usually having little or nothing to do with care of the patient. Such a concept is the trauma service, one of which is described in "The Integrated Trauma Service," by Maull and Haynes (p 497). For years in many institutions, the emergency department has had the unenviable task of sorting out which service to involve in the care of multi- ple organ-damaged patients. How many patients have suffered from the inevitable "ping-pong? .... You're right, that's a very sick patient, but not on my service!" How easy has it been to convince the general surgeon to admit the patient with a head injury, a fractured femur and a microscopic hematuria? To have a single service capable of orchestrating the multiple superspecialty needs of the traumatized patient is indeed a luxury. How should such a service relate to emergency medicine? In a number of institutions with strong trauma services, emergency medicine has been unable to gain a foothold. Or if emergency medicine residents are trained there, they play a minor role, little advanced beyond that of a student or first postgraduate year house officer. It is significant and hardly accidental that these emergency departments have poorly organized emergency medical services (EMS) systems and very poor care of any but the most life-threatened patients. There need not be antagonism between emergency medicine and surgery. Both services will profit from a well run paramedic program with strong medical control. A well run system can deliver advance information as to what is coming and when to divert critical patients when the trauma service is completely tied up in the operating room. Furthermore, the emergency medicine resident and attending staff can direct the initial resuscitation and stabilization of the patient and assist in the pro- curement of appropriate diagnostic studies. There is no need to exclude either service. In fact, this was the pat- tern of care in World War II and the Korean War. In civilian practice, the emergency service assumes a role of the Battalion Aid Station. What about the inevitable conflict over who does the initial stabilizing procedures? There is really nothing ar- cane about starting intravenous lines, placing nasogas- tric tubes and very little concerning the more sophisti- cated procedures such as thoracostomy or thoracotomy. The trauma service can work as a team with the emer- gency personnel to insure that appropriate procedures are done in a timely fashion and in a safe and high quality manner. Improving the quality of care to all patients in the emergency department not only enables better manage- ment of the trauma patient but produces a system that can respond to even subtle injuries that would otherwise be lost in the general crush of busy hours. I can only hope that more institutions will make a commitment to the organization of a trauma service, and an emergency medical service. We shall then experience a subsequent improvement not only in service to critical patients, but also in the education of students and house officers, and research into improved care. Peter Rosen, MD "~ (Dr. Rosen is director of the Division of Emergency Medicine at Denver General Hospital and a JACEP con- tributing editor.) J~P 6:11 (Nov) 1977 . 514/sl

Trauma service and emergency medicine

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Trauma service and emergency medicine

idencies. If academic ians in emergency medicine are to ~chieve recogni t ion and acceptance by the t r a d i t i o n a l specialties, then qua l i ty research (with its accompanying ~ d e r s t a n d i n g of values) needs to be demons t ra ted by those who are involved in emergency medicine academic programs. Inc luding the thought processes and scientif ic studies of medical disciplines, involved with t r e a t i n g the emergency pa t i en t bu t outs ide the sphere of the pre- defined f ie ld of emergency medic ine , wi l l a l low more rapid evolut ion toward the u l t ima te recognit ion by the academic communi ty of th is special ty.

Although ind iv idua ls who have commit ted themse lves to fal l- t ime pract ice of emergency medicine have given highest p r io r i ty to depa r tmen ta l recognit ion of th is spe- cialty and its accompanying board examina t ion , perhaps a higher pr ior i ty ought to be the commi tmen t to subject- ing academic thought and research projects to peer re- view in a na t iona l forum. Such exposure requires courage typical of pioneers.

The 8th Annua l Meet ing of the Univers i ty Associat ion for Emergency Medicine will be held in San Francisco at the Hyat t on Union Square May 18, 19, and 20, 1978. The call for abs t rac ts and the abs t rac t deadl ine are an- nounced on page 485. The t i t les of 15 excel lent research projects have a l r e a d y been r e p o r t e d to the p r o g r a m chairman.

What pr ice commi tmen t? C o m m i t m e n t r equ i r e s in- volvement, i nvo lvemen t r equ i r e s courage, courage re- quires commi tmen t . This has been a p ivota l y e a r for UA/EM, and we are all now commit ted to an excit ing, progressive and evolu t ionary future.

Joseph Waecker le , MD, of K a n s a s City and I wil l serve as program cochai rmen for the 1978 scientific mee t ing of UA/EM. It is not too ear ly to now send abs t rac ts to Dr. Waeckerle, c/o the UA/EM Headquar te r s , 3900 Cap i t a l City Boulevard, Lansing, Michigan 48906.

Kenneth L. Mattox, MD

(Dr. Mattox is assistant professor of surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Cora and Webb Mading Department of Surgery, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas and UA/EM Program Committee chairman.)

Trauma Service and Emergency Medicine

~ V E N W I T H I N T H E A R E A S of " c l a s s i c a l s p e c i a l t y , " there is a need for a service t ha t can cross the ar t i f ic ia l divisions w i t h i n m e d i c i n e e s t a b l i s h e d over the y e a r s for a va r i e ty of reasons, usua l ly hav ing l i t t le or no th ing to do wi th care of the pat ient .

Such a concept is the t r a u m a service, one of which is described in "The In tegra ted T r a u m a Service," by Maul l

and H a y n e s (p 497). For yea r s in many ins t i tu t ions , the emergency d e p a r t m e n t has had the unenviable t a sk of sor t ing out which service to involve in the care of mul t i - ple o rgan-damaged pa t ien ts . How many pa t ien t s have suffered from the inevi tab le "ping-pong? .... You're r ight , tha t ' s a very sick pa t ien t , but not on my service!" How easy has it been to convince the genera l surgeon to admi t the pa t i en t wi th a head injury, a f ractured femur and a microscopic hema tu r i a? To have a single service capable of orches t ra t ing the mul t ip le superspecia l ty needs of the t r aumat ized pa t ien t is indeed a luxury.

How s h o u l d such a s e r v i c e r e l a t e to e m e r g e n c y m e d i c i n e ? In a n u m b e r of i n s t i t u t i o n s w i t h s t r o n g t r a u m a services, emergency medicine has been unable to gain a foothold. Or if emergency medicine res idents a r e

t r a ined there , they p lay a minor role, l i t t le advanced beyond tha t of a s tuden t or f irst pos tgraduate yea r house officer. I t is s ignif icant and ha rd ly accidental t ha t these emergency depa r tmen t s have poorly organized emergency me d ic a l s e rv i ces (EMS) s y s t e m s and very poor ca re of any but the most l i fe - th rea tened pat ients .

There need not be a n t a g o n i s m be tween e m e r g e n c y medicine and surgery. Both services will profit from a well run paramedic p rogram wi th s trong medical control. A well run sys tem can de l iver advance informat ion as to wha t is coming and when to d iver t cri t ical pa t ien ts when the t r a u m a service is complete ly t ied up in the opera t ing room. F u r t h e r m o r e , the e m e r g e n c y medic ine r e s iden t and a t t end ing s taff can direct the ini t ia l resusc i ta t ion and s tab i l i za t ion of the pa t i en t and assis t in the pro- curement of appropr ia te d iagnost ic studies. There is no need to exclude e i the r service. In fact, this was the pat- tern of care in World W a r II and the Korean War. In civi l ian practice, the emergency service assumes a role of the Ba t ta l ion Aid Stat ion.

Wha t about the inevi tab le conflict over who does the in i t ia l s tab i l iz ing procedures? There is rea l ly noth ing ar- cane about s t a r t i ng in t ravenous lines, p lacing nasogas- tric tubes and very l i t t le concerning the more sophist i- cated procedures such as thoracos tomy or thoracotomy. The t r a u m a service can work as a t eam with the emer- gency personnel to insure t h a t appropr ia te procedures are done in a t ime ly fashion and in a safe and h igh qua l i ty manner .

Improving the qua l i t y of care to all pa t i en t s in the emergency d e p a r t m e n t not only enables bet ter manage- ment of the t r a u m a pa t i en t but produces a sys tem tha t can respond to even subt le in jur ies tha t would otherwise be lost in the genera l crush of busy hours.

I can only hope t h a t more ins t i tu t ions will make a commi tment to the organ iza t ion of a t r a u m a service, and an emergency medical service. We shal l then experience a subsequent improvement not only in service to cr i t ica l pat ients , but also in the educat ion of s tudents and house officers, and research into improved c a r e .

Peter Rosen, MD

" ~ (Dr. Rosen is director of the Division of Emergency Medicine at Denver General Hospital and a JACEP con- tributing editor.)

J ~ P 6:11 (Nov) 1977 . 514/sl