Upload
kumarecit
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
1/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 1
TREES
Consider a scenario where you are required to represent the directory structure of your
operating system.
The directory structure contains various folders and files. A folder may further contain
any number of sub folders and files.
In such a case, it is not possible to represent the structure linearly because all the items
have a hierarchical relationship among themselves.
In such a case, it would be good if you have a data structure that enables you to store
your data in a nonlinear fashion.
DEFINITION:
A tree is a nonlinear data structure that represent a hierarchical relationship among
the various data elements
Trees are used in applications in which the relation between data elements needs to
be represented in a hierarchy.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
2/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 2
Each element in a tree is referred to as a node.
The topmost node in a tree is called root.
Each node in a tree can further have subtrees below its hierarchy.
Let us discuss various terms that are most frequently used with trees.
Leaf node: It refers to a node with no children.
Nodes E, F, G, H, I, J, L, and M are leaf nodes.
Subtree: A portion of a tree, which can be viewed as a separate tree in itself is called a
subtree.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
3/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 3
A subtree can also contain just one node called the leaf node.
Tree with root B, containing nodes E, F, G, and H is a subtree of node A.
Children of a node: The roots of the subtrees of a node are called the children of the
node.o F, G, and H are children of node B. B is the parent of these nodes.
Degree of a node: It refers to the number of subtrees of a node in a tree.
Degree of node C is 1
Degree of node D is 2
Degree of node A is 3
Degree of node B is 4
Edge: A link from the parent to a child node is referred to as an edge.
Siblings/Brothers: It refers to the children of the same node.
Nodes B, C, and D are siblings of each other.
Nodes E, F, G, and H are siblings of each other.
Level of a node: It refers to the distance (in number of nodes) of a node from the root.
Root always lies at level 0.
As you move down the tree, the level increases by one.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
4/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 4
Depth of a tree: Refers to the total number of levels in the tree.
The depth of the following tree is 4.
Internal node: It refers to any node between the root and a leaf node.
Nodes B, C, D, and K are internal nodes.
Example:
Consider the above tree and answer the questions that follow:
a. What is the depth of the tree?
b. Which nodes are children of node B?
c. Which node is the parent of node F?
d. What is the level of node E?
e. Which nodes are the siblings of node H?
f. Which nodes are the siblings of node D?
g. Which nodes are leaf nodes?
Answer:
a. 4
b. D and E
c. C
d. 2
e. H does not have any siblings
f. The only sibling of D is E
g. F, G, H, and I
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
5/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 5
Strictly binary tree:
A binary tree in which every node, except for the leaf nodes, has non-empty left
and right children.
Binary tree is a specific type of tree in which each node can have at most two childrennamely left child and right child.
There are various types of binary trees:
Strictly binary tree
Full binary tree
Complete binary tree
Full binary tree:
A binary tree of depth d that contains exactly 2d 1 nodes.
Depth d = 3
Total number of nodes = 2d 1 = 23 1 = 7
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
6/36
Complete binary tree:
A binary tree with
numbered from 0 to
Binary tree can be represente
Linked representation of a bin
It uses a linked list to
Each node in the link
Data
Referenc Referenc
If a node does not ha
right child fields of th
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU
nodes and depth d whose nodes correspon
n 1 in the full binary tree ofdepth k.
by Array and linked list.
ary tree:
implement a binary tree.
d representation holds the following infor
to the left childto the right child
e a left child or a right child or both, the res
at node point to NULL.
Unit III - Tree
6
to the nodes
ation:
pective left or
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
7/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 7
Traversing a Binary Tree:
You can implement various operations on a binary tree.
A common operation on a binary tree is traversal.
Traversal refers to the process of visiting all the nodes of a binary tree once.
There are three ways for traversing a binary tree:
Inorder traversal
Preorder traversal
Postorder traversal
InOrder Traversal:
In this traversal, the tree is visited starting from the root node. At a particular
node, the traversal is continued with its left node, recursively, until no further left node
is found. Then the data at the current node (the left most node in the sub tree) is visited,
and the procedure shifts to the right of the current node, and the procedure is continued.
This can be explained as:
1. Traverse the left subtree
2. Visit root
3. Traverse the right subtree (Left Data Right)
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
8/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 8
Let us consider an example.
The left subtree of node A is not NULL.
Therefore, move to node B to traverse the left
subtree of A.
1
The left subtree of node B is not NULL.
Therefore, move to node D to traverse the
left subtree of B.
The left subtree of node D is NULL.
Therefore, visit node D.
3
Left subtree of H is empty.
Therefore, visit node H.
4
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
9/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 9
Right subtree of H is empty.
Therefore, move to node B.
5
The left subtree of B has been visited.
Therefore, visit node B.
6
Right subtree of B is not empty.
Therefore, move to the right subtree of B.
Left subtree of E is empty.
Therefore, visit node E.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
10/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 10
Right subtree of E is empty.
Therefore, move to node A.
7
Left subtree of A has been visited.
Therefore, visit node A.
8
Right subtree of A is not empty.
Therefore, move to the right subtree of A.
9
Left subtree of C is not empty.
Therefore, move to the left subtree of C.
10
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
11/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 11
Left subtree of F is empty.
Therefore, visit node F.
11
Right subtree of F is empty.
Therefore, move to node C.
12
The left subtree of node C has been visited.
Therefore, visit node C.
13
Right subtree of C is not empty.
Therefore, move to the right subtree of
node C.
14
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
12/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 12
Left subtree of G is not empty.
Therefore, move to the left subtree of node G.
15
Left subtree of I is empty.
Therefore, visit I.
16
Right subtree of I is empty.
Therefore, move to node G.
17
Visit node G.
18
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
13/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 13
Right subtree of G is empty.
19
Preorder Traversal
In this traversal, the tree is visited starting from the root node. At a particular node,
the data is read (visited), then the traversal continues with its left node, recursively,
until no further left node is found. Then the right node of the recent left node is set as the
current node, and the procedure is continued. This can be explained as:
1. Visit root
2. Traverse the left subtree
3. Traverse the right subtree
PostOrder Traversal:
In this traversal, the tree is visited starting from the root node. At a particular node,
the traversal is continued with its left node, recursively, until no further left node isfound. Then the right node of the current node (the left most node in the sub tree) is
visited, and the procedure shifts to the right of the current node, and the procedure
is continued. This can be explained as:
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
14/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 14
1. Traverse the left subtree
2. Traverse the right subtree
3. Visit the root
BINARY SEARCH TREE
An important application of binary trees is their use in searching. Let us assume that
each node in the tree is assigned a key value.
The property that makes a binary tree into a binary search tree is that for every node,
X, in the tree, the values of all the keys in the left subtree are smaller than the key value in
X, and the values of all the keys in the right subtree are larger than the key value in X.
Notice that this implies that all the elements in the tree can be ordered in some consistent
manner. In Figure 4.15, the tree on the left is a binary search tree, but the tree on the right is
not. The tree on the right has a node with key 7 in the left subtree of a node with key 6
(which happens to be the root).
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
15/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 15
FIND AN ELEMENT IN A TREE:
To find an element in a Tree we check if the Tree structure T is exist or not. If it does not exist it
returns NULL.
If T is exist, then we can just return. Otherwise, if the key stored at T is x, we can return T.
Otherwise, we make a recursive call on a subtree of T, either left or right, depending on the
relationship of x to the key stored in T.
The code is an implementation of this strategy.
ypedef
tree_ptr
find( element_type x, SEARCH_TREE T )
{
if( T == NULL )
return NULL;
if( x < T->element )
return( find( x, T->left ) );else
if( x > T->element )
return( find( x, T->right ) );
else
return T;
}
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
16/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 16
Find_min and find_max:
These routines return the position of the smallest and largest elements in the tree,
respectively.
To perform a find_min, start at the root and go left as long as there is a left child.
Finally the left most node is the minimum element of the tree.
The stopping point is the smallest element.
The find_max routine is the same, except that branching is to the right child.
The right most element is the maximum value.
Findmin:
tree_ptr
find_min( SEARCH_TREE T )
{
if( T == NULL )
return NULL;
else
if( T->left == NULL )
return( T );
else
return( find_min ( T->left ) );
}
Findmax:
tree_ptr
find_max( SEARCH_TREE T )
{
if( T != NULL )
while( T->right != NULL )
T = T->right;
return T;
}
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
17/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 17
Insert:
The insertion routine is conceptually simple. To insert x into tree T, proceed down the
tree as you would with a find.
If x is found, do nothing (or "update" something). Otherwise, insert x at the last spot on
the path traversed.
To insert 5, we traverse the tree as though a find were occurring. At the node with key
4, we need to go right, but there is no subtree, so 5 is not in the tree, and this is the
correct spot.
Duplicates can be handled by keeping an extra field in the node record indicating the
frequency of occurrence. This adds some extra space to the entire tree, but is better than
putting duplicates in the tree (which tends to make the tree very deep). Of course this
strategy does not work if the key is only part of a larger record.
If that is the case, then we can keep all of the records that have the same key in an
auxiliary data structure, such as a list or another search tree.
Since T points to the root of the tree and the root changes on the first insertion, insert
is written as a function that returns a pointer to the root of the new tree. Lines 8 and 10
recursively insert and attach x into the appropriate subtree.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
18/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 18
Type Declarations:
Struct treeNode
{
Int element:
Struct TreeNode *left, *right;}
Typedef struct treeNode *node;
Typedef int ElementType;
Node insert(ElementType, node)
Node delete(Elementtype, node)
void Findmin(node)
void Findmax(node)
void display(node, int);
Syntax: Insertion
insert( element_type x, SEARCH_TREE T )
{
if( T == NULL )
{
/* Create and return a one-node tree */
T = (SEARCH_TREE) malloc ( sizeof (struct tree)
if( T == NULL )
printf( " tree does not exist!!!" );
else
{
T->element = x;
T->left = T->right = NULL;
}
}
else
if( x < T->element )
T->left = insert( x, T->left );
else
if( x > T->element )
T->right = insert( x, T->right );
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
19/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 19
/* else x is in the tree already. We'll do nothing
*/
return T; /* Don't forget this line!! */
}
Delete:
As is common with many data structures, the hardest operation is deletion. Once we
have found the node to be deleted, we need to consider three possibilities.
Case I: Node to be deleted is the leaf node
Case II: Node to be deleted has one child (left or right)
Case III: Node to be deleted has two children
If the node is a leaf, it can be deleted immediately.
If the node has one child, the node can be deleted after its parent adjusts a pointer to
bypass the node (we will draw the pointer directions explicitly for clarity).
Notice that the deleted node is now unreferenced and can be disposed of only if a pointer
to it has been saved.
The complicated case deals with a node with two children.
The general strategy is to replace the key of this node with the smallest key of the right
subtree (which is easily found) and recursively delete that node (which is now empty).
Because the smallest node in the right subtree cannot have a left child, the second delete
is an easy one. Figure 4.24 shows an initial tree and the result of a deletion.
The node to be deleted is the left child of the root; the key value is 2. It is replaced with
the smallest key in its right subtree (3), and then that node is deleted as before.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
20/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 20
The code performs deletion. It is inefficient, because it makes two passes down the
tree to find and delete the smallest node in the right subtree when this is appropriate. It is
easy to remove this inefficiency, by writing a special delete_min function, and we have left
it in only for simplicity.
If the number of deletions is expected to be small, then a popular strategy to use is
lazy deletion: When an element is to be deleted, it is left in the tree and merely marked asbeing deleted. This is especially popular if duplicate keys are present, because then the field
that keeps count of the frequency of appearance can be decremented. If the number of real
nodes in the tree is the same as the number of "deleted" nodes, then the depth of the tree is
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
21/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 21
only expected to go up by a small constant (why?), so there is a very small time penalty
associated with lazy deletion.
delete( element_type x, SEARCH_TREE T ){
tree_ptr tmp_cell, child;
if( T == NULL )
error("Element not found");
else
if( x < T->element ) /* Go left */
T->left = delete( x, T->left );
else
if( x > T->element ) /* Go right */
T->right = delete( x, T->right );
else /* Found element to be deleted */
if( T->left && T->right ) /* Two children */
{ /* Replace with smallest in right subtree */
tmp_cell = find_min( T->right );
T->element = tmp_cell->element;
T->right = delete( T->element, T->right );
}
else /* One child */
}
tmp_cell = T;
if( T->left == NULL ) /* Only a right child */
child = T->right;
if( T->right == NULL ) /* Only a left child */
child = T->left;
free( tmp_cell );
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
22/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 22
return child;
}
return T;
}
AVL Tree
In a binary search tree, the time required to search for a particular value depends upon its
height.
The shorter the height, the faster is the search.
However, binary search trees tend to attain large heights because of continuous insert
and delete operations.
Consider an example in which you want to insert some numeric values in a binary
search tree in the following order:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
After inserting values in the specified order, the binary search tree appears as
follows:
This process can be very time consuming if the number of values stored in a binary
search tree is large.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
23/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 23
Now if you want to search for a value 14 in the given binary search tree, you will
have to traverse all its preceding nodes before you reach node 14. In this case, you
need to make 14 comparisons
Therefore, such a structure loses its property of a binary search tree in which afterevery comparison, the search operations are reduced to half.
To solve this problem, it is desirable to keep the height of the tree to a minimum.
Therefore, the following binary search tree can be modified to reduce its height.
The height of the binary search tree has now been reduced to 4
Now if you want to search for a value 14, you just need to traverse nodes 8 and 12,
before you reach node 14
In this case, the total number of comparisons to be made to search for node 14 is
three.
This approach reduces the time to search for a particular value in a binary search tree.
This can be implemented with the help of a height balanced tree.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
24/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 24
Height Balanced Tree
A height balanced tree is a binary tree in which the difference between the heights of
the left subtree and right subtree of a node is not more than one.
In a height balanced tree, each node has a Balance Factor (BF) associated with it.
For the tree to be balanced, BF can have three values:
0: A BF value of 0 indicates that the height of the left subtree of a node is
equal to the height of its right subtree.
1: A BF value of 1 indicates that the height of the left subtree is greater than
the height of the right subtree by one. A node in this state is said to be left
heavy.
1: A BF value of 1 indicates that the height of the right subtree is greater
than the height of the left subtree by one. A node in this state is said to be
right heavy.
Fig. Balanced Binary Search Trees
After inserting a new node in a height balanced tree, the balance factor of one or
more nodes may attain a value other than 1, 0, or 1.
This makes the tree unbalanced.
In such a case, you first need to locate the pivot node.
A pivot node is the nearest ancestor of the newly inserted node, which has a balance
factor other than 1, 0 or 1.
To restore the balance, you need to perform appropriate rotations around the pivot
node.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
25/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 25
Inserting Nodes in a Height Balanced Tree
Insert operation in a height balanced tree is similar to that in a simple binary search tree.
However, inserting a node can make the tree unbalanced.
To restore the balance, you need to perform appropriate rotations around the pivot node.
This involves two cases:
When the pivot node is initially right heavy and the new node is inserted in the right
subtree of the pivot node.
When the pivot node is initially left heavy and the new node is inserted in the left
subtree of the pivot node.
Let us first consider a case in which the pivot node is initially right heavy and the new
node is inserted in the right subtree of the pivot node.
In this case, after the insertion of a new element, the balance factor of pivot node
becomes 2.
Now there can be two situations in this case:
If a new node is inserted in the right subtree of the right child of the pivot node.(LL)
If the new node is inserted in the left subtree of the right child of the pivot node.(RR)
Consider the first case in which a new node is inserted in the right subtree of the right
child of the pivot node.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
26/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 26
Single Rotation:
The two trees in Figure 4.31 contain the same elements and are both binary search trees.
First of all, in both trees k 1 < k 2. Second, all elements in the subtree X are smaller
than k 1 in both trees.
Third, all elements in subtree Z are larger than k 2. Finally, all elements in subtree Y are
in between k 1 and k 2. The conversion of one of the above trees to th e other is known as
a rotation.
A rotation involves only a few pointer changes (we shall see exactly how many later),
and changes the structure of the tree while preserving the search tree property.
The rotation does not have to be done at the root of a tree; it can be done at any node in
the tree, since that node is the root of some subtree.
It can transform either tree into the other.
This gives a simple method to fix up an AVL tree if an insertion causes some node in an
AVL tree to lose the balance property: Do a rotation at that node.
The basic algorithm is to start at the node inserted and travel up the tree, updating the
balance information at every node on the path. If we get to the root without having found
any badly balanced nodes, we are done. Otherwise, we do a rotation at the first bad node
found, adjust its balance, and are done (we do not have to continue going to the root). In
many cases, this is sufficient to rebalance the tree. For instance, in Figure 4.32, after the
insertion of the in the original AVL tree on the left, node 8 becomes unbalanced. Thus,
we do a single rotation between 7 and 8, obtaining the tree on the right.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
27/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 27
Figure 4.32 AVL property destroyed by insertion of 6 1/2 , then fixed by a rotation
Let us work through a rather long example. Suppose we start with an initially empty
AVL tree and insert the keys 1 through 7 in sequential order. The first problem occurs when
it is time to insert key 3, because the AVL property is violated at the root. We perform a
single rotation between the root and its right child to fix the problem. The tree is shown in
the following figure, before and
after the rotation:
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
28/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 28
To make things clearer, a dashed line indicates the two nodes that are the subject of
the rotation. Next, we insert the key 4, which causes no problems, but the insertion of 5
creates a violation at node 3, which is fixed by a single rotation. Besides the local change
caused by the rotation, the programmer must remember that the rest of the tree must be
informed of this change. Here, this means that 2's right child must be reset to point to 4
instead of 3. This is easy to forget to do and would destroy the tree (4 would be
inaccessible).
Next, we insert 6. This causes a balance problem for the root, since its left subtree is
of height 0, and its right subtree would be height 2. Therefore, we perform a single rotation
at the root between 2 and 4.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
29/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 29
The rotation is performed by making 2 a child of 4 and making 4's original left
subtree the new right subtree of 2. Every key in this subtree must lie between 2 and 4, so
this transformation makes sense. The next key we insert is 7, which causes another rotation.
Double Rotation:
The algorithm described in the preceding paragraphs has one problem. There is a
case where the rotation does not fix the tree. Continuing our example, suppose we insert
keys 8 through 15 in reverse order. Inserting 15 is easy, since it does not destroy the balance
property, but inserting 14 causes a height imbalance at node 7.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
30/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 30
As the diagram shows, the single rotation has not fixed the height imbalance. The
problem is that the height imbalance was caused by a node inserted into the tree containing
the middle elements (tree Y in Fig. 4.31) at the same time as the other trees had identical
heights. The case is easy to check for, and the solution is called a double rotation, which is
similar to a single rotation but involves four subtrees instead of three. In Figure 4.33, the
tree on the left is converted to the tree on the right. By the way, the effect is the same as
rotating between k1 and k2 and then between k2 and k3.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
31/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 31
In our example, the double rotation is a right-left double rotation and involves 7, 15,
and 14. Here, k3 is the node with key 7, k1 is the node with key 15, and k2 is the node withkey 14. Subtrees A, B, C, and D are all empty.
Next we insert 13, which require a double rotation. Here the double rotation is again
a right-left double rotation that will involve 6, 14, and 7 and will restore the tree. In this
case, k 3 is the node with key 6, k 1 is the node with key 14, and k 2 is the node with key 7.
Subtree A is the tree rooted at the node with key 5, subtree B is the empty subtree that was
originally the left child of the node with key 7, subtree C is the tree rooted at the node with
key 13, and finally, subtree D is the tree rooted at the node with key 15.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
32/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 32
If 12 is now inserted, there is an imbalance at the root. Since 12 is not between 4 and
7, we know that the single rotation will work.
Insertion of 11 will require a single rotation:
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
33/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 33
To insert 10, a single rotation needs to be performed, and the same is true for the
subsequent insertion of 9. We insert 8 without a rotation, creating the almost perfectly
balanced tree that follows.
Finally, we insert 81/2 to show the symmetric case of the double rotation. Notice that
81/2 causes the node containing 9 to become unbalanced. Since 81/2 is between 9 and 8
(which is 9's child on the path to 81/2, a double rotation needs to be performed, yielding the
following tree.
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
34/36
Example:
Let us consider an example t
whenever required.
50 40 30 60 55
Insert 50
Insert 40
Tree is balan
Insert 30
Before rotation
Tree becomes unbalanced A si
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU
insert values in a binary search tree and restor
80 10 35 32
tree is balanced.
ced.
After rotation
gle right rotation restores the balance
Unit III - Tree
34
its balance
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
35/36
Unit III - Tree
Prepared By M.Raja, CSE, KLU 35
Tree becomes unbalanced, A single left rotation restores the balance
Before Rotation After rotation
Now the Tree is unbalanced, A double rotation restores the balance
Before Rotation After Rotation
Insert 80 (single left rotation)
7/29/2019 Trees Notes NoRestrictiona
36/36
Unit III - Tree
Insert 10 Insert 35
Insert 32 (double rotation)
Finally the Tree become balanced.
*******