Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    1/30

    Trees & Tanks in Villages:

    International experiences

    of community forestry

    have its potential in forestmanagement for India.

    Also, references are

    available on the role that

    forests and trees play and

    how to manage these

    resources in indigenous

    literature like Vedas,Upanishands,

    Mahabharata,

    Ramayana, Arthasastra,

    and Brihatsamhita etc.

    Sustainable

    production and

    utilization of

    WOOD biofuels

    in India

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    2/30

    2

    Indigenous Indic Traditions in Forestry:

    What lessons are there for Contemporary

    Sustainable Forest Management

    from adapting these?

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    3/30

    3

    Forest management systems are referred to as

    indigenous, when they are primarily based on local

    experience of their local world that is, perhaps,

    most important to them. Indigenous refers to

    knowledge and practices that have originatedlocally and are performed by a community or society

    in a specific place. This knowledge evolves and

    emerges continually over time according to peoplesperception and experience of their environment and

    is usually transmitted from generation to generation

    by word of mouth or by practice.

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    4/30

    4

    In contrast, scientific forestry utilises

    specialised knowledge for managing forest

    resources not only for local populations but

    also for wider objectives and the global

    scientific forestry community. Scientific

    knowledge on forest management is

    generally shared in formal, written, and non-

    traditional ways.

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    5/30

    5

    Forest management has been defined as the process ofmaking and implementing decisions about the use and

    maintenance of forest resources and organisation of relatedactivities. The decision-making process involves integrationand utilisation of several kinds of knowledge.

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    6/30

    6

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    7/30

    7

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    8/30

    Water harvesting and tree growing

    8 community forestry

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    9/30

    9

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    10/30

    Varahamihira in 5th century AD wrote on thetanks and trees relationship

    A total of 1.53 million village

    tanks built from 2000 BC

    onwards still survive in India

    today.These tanks vary in size (0.5

    ha to several hundred ha. of

    water harvesting area and a

    grove of few trees to verylarge groves).

    10

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    11/30

    When indigenous knowledge, indigenousinstitutions and indigenous strategies arecombined with scientific strategies andknowledge the result is far more productivethan as understood currently.

    11 Biomass availability

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    12/30

    12

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    13/30

    13

    International experience suggests that when

    communities are given greater rights to use forest

    resources along with increased responsibility and

    capacities, both rural incomes and conservation

    often improve dramatically. To lift rural incomes,

    however, forestry also needs to be coupled with

    broader rural development programs that promote

    diverse livelihoods. Farming, sericulture, and horticulture, as

    well as the collection, processing, and marketing of forest

    products like timber, medicinal plants and aromatic oils can

    help boost the rural economy.

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    14/30

    Joint Forest Management in India

    In India, community forestry is being promoted

    under Joint Forest Management. It comprises a

    partnership between local community institutions

    and state forest departments for sustainable

    management and benefits sharing.

    Although the primary objective of community

    forestry in India is that of growing timber, the

    programme deals mainly with the reforestation

    and rehabilitation of degraded forest lands.

    COMMUNITY FORESTRY14

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    15/30

    Joint Forest Management: COMMENT

    This is accomplished through the naturalregeneration of Sal (Shorea robusta) forests, which

    in many areas regenerates easily if protected from

    grazing animals.

    The prerequisite for Joint Forest Management is an agreement

    between government and local peoplethe management

    plan. Yet solely the forest department can prepare the

    management plan without adequate negotiation with local

    people. This is a limitation to community forestrys success in

    India.

    15

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    16/30

    Joint Forest Management: CRITICISMS

    The local people are requested to look after theforest but it is the government, which logs the

    timber. For example, in Bihar state, Krishnaswamy

    (1995) mentions that low participation persists

    because people do not expect to benefit from the

    forests they are supposed to protect. The

    government generally only designates poorly

    stocked, relatively unproductive and degraded

    forests for Joint Forest Management.

    16

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    17/30

    Joint Forest Management

    Revenue sharing between villagers and

    the government only reduces the

    inadequate return local communities

    receive from these forests. Ideally, the

    community needs all the benefits to have

    a reasonable chance at rural

    development.

    17

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    18/30

    Since the Rigvedic period through

    Puranic times there are numerous

    descriptions of the trees groves and tanks(talabs) in India. Varahamihira in 5th

    century AD wrote and with great detail on

    the tanks and trees relationship. These

    prescriptions were considered sacred

    and ethic demanded that the people

    should practice for the common good of

    the humanity. This phenomenon can beunderstood as a proven fact getting

    institutionalized by the cultural traditions.

    18

    19

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    19/30

    What resulted from this is amazing! A

    total of 1.53 million village tanks built

    from 2000 BC onwards still survive in

    India today. These tanks vary in size

    (0.5 ha to several hundred ha. of

    water harvesting area and a grove of

    few trees to very large groves).

    19

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    20/30

    India wants sustainable development while

    solving the water problem. It must revive

    and support the traditions that are useful

    and have stood the test of time. In fact at

    several places revival of such traditions has

    been very encouraging. Examples suggest

    that this has resulted in the sustainable

    forestry and livelihood security.

    20 Water harvest methods

    11 OLD & NEW FOREST

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    21/30

    About ethnoforestry or the indigenous knowledge onforests in India:

    On the role that forests and trees play andhow to manage these resources, older

    literature references are available in Vedas,

    Upanishands, Mahabharata, Ramayana,

    Arthasastra, and Brihatsamhita etc. On the contemporary landscape and

    indigenous management forms, data is

    available that is illustrated withassessments of the various types of

    indigenous forests, trees and landscape

    management in several parts of India.

    11 OLD & NEW FOREST

    MANAGEMENT

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    22/30

    This has a great relevance for the

    history of forest management and the

    future of sustainable forest

    management in India.

    To clarify the issue of equity of

    knowledge adopted here is theframework of empowerment, security

    and opportunity.

    22 equity of knowledge

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    23/30

    Equity of knowledge as Empowerment: This

    can be understood as making the state

    institutions pro-people and pro-people's

    knowledge, thereby reducing the socialbarriers to participation and enhancing the

    capacity of the poor to make choices to

    address the livelihood security and

    sustainability.

    23

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    24/30

    Equity of knowledge as Security: By

    making the productive use of

    collective wisdom of formal and

    traditional sciences we shall be able to

    help the poor to manage the risks they

    face because of the destruction of theresource-base and societal hindrances.

    24

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    25/30

    Equity of knowledge as Opportunity: The

    process of access, transmission, integration

    and field application of indigenous

    knowledge and Indic traditions with formalstrategies promises to enhance the

    productivity and efficiency of context

    specific developmental interventions for

    attacking the poverty and addressing the

    sustainability of natural resources.

    25

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    26/30

    26

    Basic issues that are to be explored are:1. What are the indigenous Indic traditions in forestry?

    2. What is the history of the neglect and destruction ofthese traditions?3. How are these traditions reflected in contemporarylandscape in India?

    4. How can the society benefit from Indic Traditions inorder to achieve the objectives of sustainable forestmanagement? In other words, how the equity ofknowledge can be achieved between the localcommunities possessing the indigenous

    knowledge and formal forestry scholars?5. What are the contemporary examples ofintegration of Indic traditions with modern forestry?

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    27/30

    27

    Contributions that examine the above issues may

    relate to:1. Indigenous Indic Traditions in Forestry including

    various ethnoforestry practices such as sacred

    groves, sacred gardens, home gardens, sacred

    corridors, tanks and trees, community conserved

    landscapes etc.

    2. Ecological, Economic and Societal dimensions of

    Indigenous Indic Traditions in Forestry

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    28/30

    28

    3. Indigenous Indic Traditions in Natural Resource

    Management4. Indigenous Indic Traditions in Water Management

    including Traditional Water Harvesting Systems

    5. Role of Indigenous Indic Traditions for Sustainability

    6. Case studies that demonstrate the applicability and

    integration of Indic traditions with modern science?

    7. Role of Indigenous Indic Traditions in Forestry for

    Empowerment, Opportunity and Security; Carbon

    Sequestration; Watershed Protection; etc.

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    29/30

    29

    Pressures on Indias ForestsPressure on Indias forest comes from a variety of sources,

    including:

    Increase in population, from 390 million in 1950 to 1 billion in2001 Loss of 4.5 million hectares since 1950 through agriculturalconversion and other uses High percentage (78%) of forest subject to heavy grazing

    Exposure of half the forests to fire risk Shifting cultivation, which affects almost 10 million hectares offorest Encroachment on 1.36 million hectares of forest by 2002, withevictions accounting for only 10% of affected land by 2004.

    Source: India stat (2005); Bahuguna and others (2004). 2006

  • 7/30/2019 Trees,Tanks and Livelihood-India

    30/30

    30

    The challenge now is to manage forest

    resources for multiple benefits, requiring

    communities not only to reconcile

    competing internal interests, but also to

    manage a complex interface with both the

    state (representing the public interest,

    nationally and globally) and the forest

    industry.