Upload
dulcie-davidson
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TRINNODD
TRansfer of INNOvation on Dual Diagnosis
Training module Reus 22-24 March
Trainees
Number: 24 out of 100 selected according to registration order, 10 Men 14 Women
Occupation: Auxiliary care givers.
Units: Marinada (Severe cases), Pirineos (Dual Diagnosis) , UHEDI (Long Term Care Unit for DD)
Seniority: people up to 20 years
Trainers
Mar Maduell- Psychologist, F. Villablanca- “The Role of the Care giver”
Daniel Gallo- Psychologist, F. Villablanca- “Rehabilitation Interventions with PWDD”
Rafael Martinez- Psychologist, F. Villablanca- “Behaviour Problems And DD”
Mencía Ruiz- Psychologist. AEECRM- “Stress and QoL”
Objectives
Pilot module with future applications
Evaluation of Knowledge
Increase theoretical/practical knowledge of frontline care givers
Certify the course
Training
A total of 12 attending hours plus 5 extra non attending hours for the analysis of a case history dued the following week
22 March: “The Role of the care giver” Mar Maduell. 4h
-Behabiour change techniques
-Intervention in specific situations
-Psychopathology
-Practical exercises
Training
23 March: “Rehabilitation interventions in DI” Daniel Gallo. 4h
-Dual Diagnosis
-Psychological Models
-Practical exercises
Training
24 March: “Behaviour Problems and DD” Rafael Martinez. 2h
-Phenotypes-The Brain
24 March: “Stress and Quality of Life” Mencía Ruiz. 2h
-Stress implications in QoL-Burnout -Practical exercises
CD documents
FEAPS
-Dual Diagnosis
-Mental health disorders in DI
-Mental Health and ID. Practice guidelines for care givers
WPA- DOWN
-Diagnostic, Treatment and related support Services for Persons with Developmental disabilities and severe Behavioural Problems
-Using medication to manage Behaviour Problems Among Adults with Intellectual Disability
COMMUNITY OF MADRID
-Practice guidelines on ID and Mental Health
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Form 1: to be completed at the begining of the course
Please tell us how important you think that the following topics are to your
work with people with intellectual disabilities. Please rate the importance
on the scale from 1 to 6: 1 = not important, 6 = very important. Please
circle the number on the scale that indicates how important you think that
it is. If you do not know at the moment, then please tick the box the box
at the end.
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Not Highly important important
Don`t know
1 2 3 4 5 6
BASIC KNOWLEDGE ABOUT INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY AND MENTAL HEALTH
1 3 21
HOW WE DECIDE WHAT IS NORMAL AND WHAT IS ABNORMAL
3 9 12
HOW MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS CAN START AND DEVELOP IN PEOPLE WITH ID
1 8 15
THE KIND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS THAT PEOPLE WITH ID HAVE
1 5 18
HOW TO COMMUNICATE BETTER IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE’S PROBLEMS
3 21
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Not Highly important important
Don`t know
1 2 3 4 5 6
THE RANGE OF INTERVENTIONS FOR HELPING PEOPLE WITH ID AND MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS
1 23
PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENTS 1 2 7 13 1
TALKING TREATMENTS (COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY)
1 8 15
DRUG TREATMENTS 1 1 12 8 2
MULTIDISCIPLINARY WORKING AND ROLES
1 2 5 16
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Not Highlyimportant important
Don`tknow
1 2 3 4 5 6
EVALUATING QUALITY OF LIFE 1 5 16
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DUAL DIAGNOSIS AND CHALLENGING BEHAVIOUR
1 1 5 17
ASSESSING AND MANAGING RISK 2 3 20
LOOKING AFTER YOUR OWN MENTAL HEALTH
1 20
MANAGING STRESS 2 3 19
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Form 2: to be completed at the end of the course
Please tell us how satisfied you were with the teaching of the
following topics on the course. Please rate the importance on the
scale from 1 to 6: 1 = not important, 6 = very important. Please
circle the number on the scale that indicates how satisfied you think
that it is. If you do not know at the moment, then please tick the
box the box at the end.
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Not Highlyimportant important
Don t know
1 2 3 4 5 6
BASIC KNOWLEDGE ABOUT INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY AND MENTAL HEALTH
2 6 16
HOW WE DECIDE WHAT IS NORMAL AND WHAT IS ABNORMAL
1 3 8 12
HOW MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS CAN START AND DEVELOP IN PEOPLE WITH ID
3 7 14
THE KIND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS THAT PEOPLE WITH ID HAVE
3 6 15
HOW TO COMMUNICATE BETTER IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE’S PROBLEMS
1 4 19
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Not Highly important important
Don`t know
1 2 3 4 5 6
THE RANGE OF INTERVENTIONS FOR HELPING PEOPLE WITH ID AND MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS
2 8 14
PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENTS 1 2 9 11 1
TALKING TREATMENTS (COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY)
1 3 8 12
DRUG TREATMENTS 1 6 9 6
MULTIDISCIPLINARY WORKING AND ROLES
1 8 14 1
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Not Highlyimportant important
Don`tknow
1 2 3 4 5 6
EVALUATING QUALITY OF LIFE 1 6 17
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DUAL DIAGNOSIS AND CHALLENGING BEHAVIOUR
1 1 6 13 3
ASSESSING AND MANAGING RISK 1 1 8 14
LOOKING AFTER YOUR OWN MENTAL HEALTH
2 6 16
MANAGING STRESS 1 4 19
Evaluation of the Course Overall
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Disagree Disagreeslightly
Agreeslightly
Agree Don`tknow
THIS COURSE WAS RELEVANT TO MY WORK / ROLE
2 22
THE COURSE COVERED MOST OF THE THINGS THAT I EXPECTED
5 20
I HAVE LEARNED A LOT FROM THIS COURSE
1 3 20
THE COURSE DID NOT TELL ME ANYTHING NEW
24
I HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE MENTAL HEALTH OF PEOPLE WITH ID
2 22
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Disagree Disagreeslightly
Agreeslightly
Agree Don`tknow
I HAVE A BETTER IDEA OF HOW TO HELP PEOPLE WITH ID WHO HAVE MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS
1 23
THE COURSE DID NOT TELL ME ENOUGH ABOUT THE MENTAL HEALTH OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
19 2 2 1
THE IDEAS AND FACTS PRESENTED WERE EASILY UNDERSTOOD
4 20
I WILL FEEL MORE SUPPORTED IN MY WORK AFTER THIS COURSE
8 15 1
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Evaluation of the Organization of the Course
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
ORGANISATION OF THE COURSE Disagree Disagreeslightly
Agree slightly
Agree
THE COURSE WAS WELL ORGANISED 24
THE TEACHING WAS PRESENTED IN AN EASILY UNDERSTOOD FORM
2 22
THERE WAS ENOUGH TIME FOR QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION
4 6 14
THE COURSE MATERIALS PROVIDED WERE USEFUL
4 20
THERE WAS A GOOD BALANCE OF TOPICS PRESENTED IN THE COURSE
3 21
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
Disagree Disagreeslightly
Agreeslightly
Agree
I WAS HELPED IF THERE WAS ANYTHING I DID NOT UNDERSTAND
2 22
I KNOW WHERE TO LOOK FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
1 4 19
I KNOW WHERE TO LOOK FOR FURTHER SUPPORT
3 21
I FELT INVOLVED IN THE TRAINING 5 19
I FOUND THE TRAINING INSPIRING 5 19
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU THINK WAS PARTICULARILY GOOD ABOUT THE TRAINING?-6 people would extend the lenght of the course
-18 blank
Participant EvaluationQuestionnaire
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU THINK WAS PARTICULARILY GOOD ABOUT THE TRAINING?-2 Trainees highlight the importance of dynamics and examples to understand concepts and increase empathy
-1 Person highlights the exchange of different opinions
-1 Person was specially pleased with the stress presentation
-13 Trainees are pleased with most of the contents of the course
-2 People state having acquired a better understanding of DD
-2 Trainees highlight the professionalism of trainers
Participant Evaluation Questionnaire
IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE US TO KNOW?
- 6 Trainees point out the lack of time to deep in some concepts.
- 1 Person requires more dynamics
- 1 Person states that the course should be compulsory for all care givers.
-2 Trainees would like to repeat the course in a couple of months