Upload
dewitt
View
47
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
TRITON ENGINEERING SERVICES COMPANY. CLIENT SERVICES AND COMPANY OVERVIEW. Triton is a subsidiary of Noble Corporation. BUSINESS VISION. WE. HIGHER RETURN ON “INVESTMENT ”. REACH. PROFIT. ACHIEVE. KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCES. TRANSFER. ESTABLISH. COOPERATION. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Triton is a subsidiary of Noble Corporation
BUSINESS VISIONBUSINESS VISION
COOPERATIONCOOPERATION
TRANSFERTRANSFER
PROFITPROFIT
ESTABLISH
REACH
ACHIEVE
HIGHER HIGHER RETURN ON RETURN ON
““INVESTMENTINVESTMENT””
WORKING ENVIRONMENT WORKING ENVIRONMENT FOR UNDERSTANDING FOR UNDERSTANDING AND COMMON GOALSAND COMMON GOALS
KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE AND AND
EXPERIENCESEXPERIENCES
WEWE
The Reduction of Lost Time andThe Reduction of Lost Time and Non Productive TimeNon Productive Time
To Implement a Cost Effective Drilling
and Completion Operation
The Reduction of Production CostThe Reduction of Production Cost
Implementation of an Educational ProcessImplementation of an Educational Process
OBJECTIVEOBJECTIVE
GOALGOAL
• Provide a full range of services to the oil and gas industry for their exploratory and development program
– from responsive help to existing resources – to full comprehensive project management
• Preparation and execution of comprehensive: Well design and well construction programs
Workover programs
Well abandonment programs
• Preparation of budgets, detailed costs• Field Supervision of logistics and well operations• Review of drilling data and drilling optimization
studies• End of well reporting and reconciliation
PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICESSERVICES
PROJECT MANAGEMENTPROJECT MANAGEMENTSERVICESSERVICES
• Preparation of operating procedures• Pre-operational Audits:
• Drilling Unit - Service Providers - Vendors• Project - Proposal / Program - Operation
• Preparation and evaluation of tenders:• The provision of services• The procurement of equipment and material
EXPERIENCE
• Completed over 500 well construction projects in 40+ countries:
• High pressure and temperature wells:
• Exploration and development wells
• Directional wells with multiple targets
• 23,000'+ total depth wells
• Complex geological areas
• Salt, sub-salt and rafted shale wells
• Water depths in excess of 7,200’
• Developed client base of major E&P Operators, National Oil
Companies and Independent operators worldwide
COMPANY HIGHLIGHTSCOMPANY HIGHLIGHTS
U.S. GOM
Mexico
Venezuela
Brazil
Canada
EuropeUK,IRL,NLDK, NOR, DL, FR, SPItaly, Black Sea
WORLDWIDE RIG OPERATION ANDWORLDWIDE RIG OPERATION ANDDRILLING ENGINEERING EXPERIENCEDRILLING ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE
WC AfricaMarroco,SenegalGuinea, Ivory CoastGhana, NigeriaGabon,CongoAngola, Namibia
Argentina
Aruba
Peru
OffshoreOnshore
Land AfricaAlgeria, ChadNigeria, Tunisia
EC AfricaMozambique
Middle EastQatar,OmanYemen,Azerbaijan
Far EastChina, VietnamMalaysia, KoreaIndonesia, India
Australia &New Zealand
Wells Internationally 1 Well program - Lukoil; Caspian Sea 2 Well program - El Paso; Brazil 1 Well program - Devon; O/S Ghana 2 Well program - El Paso; O/S Brazil14 Well program - Pemex; O/S Mexico 1 Well program - Devon; O/S Gabon
4 Well program - Brass; O/S Nigeria 2 Well program - RWE; Dutch North Sea17 Well program - PDVSA; Venezuela 8 Well program - Trinmar; O/S Trinidad 8 Well program - Pedco; O/S Korea 2 Well Program - El Paso; O/S Australia 2 Well Program - EOG Resources; O/S Trinidad
PROJECT MANAGEMENTPROJECT MANAGEMENT
MULTIWELL PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION
PERFORMANCE DRIVENBA 2249BA 2157
BA 2148
BA 2150 BA 2167
Incentive Curve
BACHAQUERO FIELD PDVSA VENEZUELA
7.3 15.5 6.5 12.9 6.0 12.0 5.56 11.60
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Efiat -5700' Cross River-5900' Abana-6150 Obio-6250'
Rotating Hours x10
Bid Days
BRASS PETROLEUM NIGERIA
Days vs. DepthGOM Sub Salt Well
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
DAYS
ME
AS
UR
ED
DE
PTH
, 100
0 FT
Ideal
Actual
AFE
WELL CONSTRUCTION WELL CONSTRUCTION SCEMATICSCEMATIC
EVALUATIONand
PLANNING
EXECUTE
CONTROL
ASSESSMENTand
BENCHMARKING
PROJECTMANAGEMENT
Define & align well and geological objectives• Conduct risk assessment
- Risk impact / Probabilities
- Identify, Quantify, Manage
- Mitigation measures / contingency plans
- Lessons Learned ~ inclusion in well plan• Benchmark development
- Rig performance ~ upgrades or improvements
- Operations ~ vendor selection criteria
- Engineering ~ well location specific
- Logistics
ENGINEERING AND PRE-PLANNING
DESIGN & PLANNINGCritical Path Plan Development
• Feasibility studies / life cycle
• Process Control, Risk vs. Success probabilities
• “Front End” engineering - rotating, flat spot times, non- productive time
• Regulatory Assistance ~ if applicable
• Knowledge management: - Average running speeds of casing - Average trip speeds open / cased hole - Average PU / LD time for BHA’s - ROP analyses for rotating / motors
• Marked-up offset well logs w/ hole problems, mud weights, casing depths, L.O.T. test data
DATA COLLECTION DATA COLLECTION KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
BENCHMARKINGBENCHMARKING
• Provide real time evaluation of performance
• Post well operations review
• End of well report ~ corporate memory
• Produce “best of the best” drilling benchmarks
• Updating of statistical benchmarks
• Capture of efficiencies & lessons learned
• Update planning process with lessons learned
COST MANAGEMENTCOST MANAGEMENT
• Accurate pre-planning AFE costs
• Accurate tracking of costs during project execution
• End of well review and reconciliation of projected costs / vs. actual costs
• Evaluation of drilling contractor, vendors and
service companies
• Evaluation of variances
• Retention of cost data for corporate memory
• Distribute results
COMPREHENSIVE PROJECTPLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
DRILLING PERFORMANCE DRILLING PERFORMANCE SYSTEMSSYSTEMS
Engineeringand
PlanningOperations
I.D.E.A.SI.D.E.A.S
NDSSNDSS
WITSWITS
OptiDrillOptiDrill
Noble Drill Smart System
Improve Drilling Efficiency Accountability System
Well Information Tracking System
EFFICIENCY DRIVEREFFICIENCY DRIVER
WELL # 1
WELL # 2
WELL # 3
NPV$
REVENUE$ PRODUCTIVITY
OPERATING PROBLEMS
DEVELOPMENT PHASEPAY BACK
EXPLORATION PHASEINVESTMENT
+
TOMORROWTOMORROW
COST$
++
TODAYTODAY
TIME-
TRUE EFFICIENCYTRUE EFFICIENCY
Well # 1
TIME
COST
$
VALUE $VALUE $Well # 2
Well # 3
Well # 4
0
12
34
5
67
8
910
Well # 1 Well # 2 Well # 3 Well # 4
AFE
Total Actual
Total Non Productive
CONFORMISTIC PLANNINGCONFORMISTIC PLANNINGMISMANAGEMENTMISMANAGEMENT
PERFORMANCE PLANNINGPERFORMANCE PLANNING EFFICIENT MANAGEMENTEFFICIENT MANAGEMENT
0
12
34
5
67
8
910
Well # 1 Well # 2 Well # 3 Well # 4
AFE
Total Actual
Total Non Productive
THE DIFFERENCETHE DIFFERENCE
• Proper Allocation of Funds• Increase number of wells drilled
• Increase Production
• Increase Profit and Return on Capital
Plan and Manage for Continuous ImprovementPlan and Manage for Continuous Improvement
• Well plan : Prognosis vs Actual
OPERATION EFFICIENCY OPERATION EFFICIENCY VALUATIONVALUATION
• Drilling Unit : Performance & Down Time
• Drilling practices: Methodology & Technology
• Drilling fluids: Formation Damage
• Logistics : Response Time & Bottle neck
• Third parties : System Performance & Down Time
• Cost : AFE vs Actual Cost
PRODUCTIVITY EFFICIENCY PRODUCTIVITY EFFICIENCY VALUATIONVALUATION
• Reservoir Management
• Completion Design
• Formation Damage
PROCESS
Management Information Technology
Knowledge Management
Data Management
PEOPLE
TECHNOLOGY
EFFICIENCY REQUISITEEFFICIENCY REQUISITE
RISK ASSESSMENT
Synthesize datato generate a subsurface
geologic model
Gather information of offset wells
Apply lessonslearned
Evaluate pore pressure for casing picksIntegrate geologic model
Learning Organization=
People+
Process+
Technology
• Professional independent project team
• Team not “tied” to any product or service company
• Objective evaluation and recommendations
• Critical path drilling program generation
• Integration of drilling efficiency systems
• Execution of program based on Cost effectiveness
• Proven track record
CONCLUSION