Trouteville Case Analysis - MIP MBA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Trouteville Case Analysis - MIP MBA

    1/2

    1

    MIPMBA32OrganizationalBehaviourCourse

    TroutevillePoliceDepartmentCase

    1. Basedonthelimitedinformationpresented,identifyandbrieflydescribethemajorcharacteristics

    oftheTroutevillePoliceDepartmentundertheleadershipofJohnStage

    ChiefStagewashighlyrespecteddespitehisdrinkingproblemsandhisshorttemper.Hegavegreat

    importancetothelevelofhispeople,andherequiredqualifiedpersonnelonhisstaff.Duringhis

    tenuretheDepartmentdidnotexperiencenomajorproblems.

    ChiefStagewasacharismaticleader,intunewiththecharacteristicsofasmallruralcommunity.

    His style implied a low level of formalization of tasks and specific duties: delegation of

    responsibilitieswashigh,aswellastheflexibilityintasksdivision.

    Duringhistenure,theDepartmentwasaflatorganization,withveryfewhierarchicallevels

    Asaconsequenceofthisleadershipstyle,theDepartmentwasanagileandflexibleorganization.

    2. IdentifyanddescribethemajorcharacteristicsoftheDepartmentafterLarryGaftsappointmentasChiefofPolice

    Chief Gaft brought to Trouteville his experience as Captain in a large metropolitan Police

    Department.

    ThefirstdecisionhetookafterhisappointmenthasbeentoreorganizetheDepartmentaccordingtotheteampolicingmanagementphilosophy.Underthisneworganizationaldesign,thestaffis

    dividedintocommitteesandteamsaccordingtospecificproblemsthatneedtobeaddressed.Clear

    targets are set and deadlines are established. In particular, the traffic teams, report writing

    committeeandthereservepoliceofficerscommitteehavebeencreated.

    Anotherdecision is theone related to the increase of hierarchical levels: the lieutenantswere

    placed incommandof divisions,the oldsergeantswerepromoted toSergeant IIlevel (with the

    responsibility of commanding a shift), and the patrolmen were promoted to Sergeant I level

    (responsibleforfieldsupervisionofacitysector,andinchargeofsubmittingamonthlyreport)

    However,noextra-salaryfortheseadditionalresponsibilitieswasrecognized,despitethefactthat

    thenewdutiesimpliednotonlyandextraresponsibility,butalsoextratimeforperformingthem.

    Chief Gafts leadership style was based on control, and is probably related to his previous

    experienceinleadinghugeteamsinabigcity.Thesamecanbesaidabouthischoiceofintroducing

    a high level of formalization of tasks and duties, including the decision of distributing a

    reorganizationmanualtopersonnel.

    During his tenure the Department became much more rigid, as roles were no more

    interchangeable. Theformalizationofrolesbroughtahigh levelofbureaucracy:the staffhad to

    spendaconsiderableportionoftheirtimeinpreparingreportsanddoingpaperwork.

  • 8/3/2019 Trouteville Case Analysis - MIP MBA

    2/2

    2

    3. HastheTroutevillePoliceDepartmentchanged?(ifyes,how?Ifnot,whydidntit?)Yes,theDepartmenthaschangedasaresultoftheorganizationalrearrangementandofthenewstyle

    ofleadership.

    The command and control approach introduced by Chief Gaft has had the undesired result ofloweringmorale,asa consequenceoftheabsenceofincentivesandofperceivedlackoftrust inthe

    personnel. Theexcessive division of tasks and responsibilities hasgreatly reduced the interchanges

    betweendifferentdivisionandteams,leadingtofrictionsandtotheloweringoftheperformances.

    Moreover,thehugeincreaseinbureaucracyhasobligedmanypolicementoabandonthefield,creating

    frustrationandlackofsharedknowledgeofthepracticalproblemsofday-by-dayactivity.

    Furtherdiscontenthascreatedbythefactthat,regardlessofthehugechangeintheorganizationthe

    activities of the Department, no training has been provided to the personnel, whichhas not been

    involvedinthereorganizationactivity.

    Inconclusion,wecanaffirmthatChiefGafthasusedawrongapproach,consideringthenewcontextin

    whichhewas going to operate. Lack of involvement of the personnel has furtherexacerbated the

    situation,leadingtoconflictsandpoorperformance.