Upload
buinhi
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
13/07/2014
1
2014 Student Conference
Clive Beer (Savills)Michael Hooke & Mark Michael (Deloitte)
Penny Lovell (Close Brothers)Ben Thomason (Asset Leverage Consultants)
Victoria Yates (Yates Legal)
Chair: Tony Pitcher (LGL Trustees)
Sponsored by:
S S CO C
P t d b Vi t i Y t
TRUSTS IN COMMERCIAL ARRANGEMENTS AND
TRANSACTIONS
Presented by Victoria Yates10 July 2014
13/07/2014
2
Introduction
1. Key features of trusts• SegregationSegregation• Flexibility• Confidentiality
2. Classification of commercial trusts
• Investment Trusts• Finance and Security Trusts• Purpose Trusts
3. Potential issues to be aware of
Key Features of Trusts
1. Segregation• Split of legal ownership and beneficial interest in assets• Split of legal ownership and beneficial interest in assets• Trust fund neither part of trustee’s estate nor beneficiaries’ estate
• Obligations on trustee provide protection to beneficiaries
2. Flexibility• Full discretion of trustee within the terms of the trust instrument
f f h• Very few restrictions on terms of the trust instrument• Trust is a relationship, not a legal person (see article 2, TJL)
3. Confidentiality• Terms of trust not a matter of public record
13/07/2014
3
Classification of Commercial Trusts
1. Investment Trusts• To hold assets
2. Finance and Security Trusts• To facilitate financial arrangements
3 P T t3. Purpose Trusts• To achieve a specific aim
Investment Trusts - JPUTS
Unithold UnitholdS i
JPUT
er 1 er 2
0.01% of units
Security over units
L
99.9% of units
Trustee 1 as
trustee of JPUT
Trustee 2 or
Nominee
UK Commercial Real Estate
Bank
Loan
Security over rent account and
real estate
13/07/2014
4
Investment Trusts – Family Unit Trusts
Structure during Settlor’s Lifetime
Trust for Trust for son and
Trust for d ht
Trust for d
Settlor directed trust for principal
spouseson and heirs
daughter and heirs
son and heirs
Family Unit Trust
Economic Units in FUT giveholder pro rata share ofincome and capital profitsgenerated by assets held inFUT
Voting Units in FUT giveholder right to nominate oneperson to Family AdvisoryCommittee
Investment Advisory Committee (composition
determined by FAC)
Family Advisory Committee (FAC)Trustee/PTC
Investment Trusts – Family Unit Trusts
Structure following Settlor’s death
Trust for Trust for son and
Trust for d ht
Trust for d
spouseson and heirs
daughter and heirs
son and heirs
Economic Units in FUTtransfer to pre‐existing trustsfor spouse and children. Canbe structured so that maleheirs receive double the
Voting Units in FUT transferto pre‐existing trusts forspouse and children. Can bestructured so that male heirsd f l h i i
Family Unit Trust
heirs receive double theshare of female heirs
Investment Advisory Committee (composition
determined by FAC)
Family Advisory Committee (FAC)Trustee/PTC
and female heirs receiveequal numbers of units
13/07/2014
5
Finance and Security Trusts –Debenture Trusts
L d L d L dL d
Trustee of Debenture Trust
Lender Lender LenderLender
Borrower
Finance and Security Trusts –Quistclose Trusts
Lender Borrower Creditors
Loan for Specified Purpose
Loan Monies held on Trust
until applied for Specified Purpose
13/07/2014
6
Finance and Security Trusts –Turnover Trusts
Parent Company
Loan Subordination
Intragroup LoanIntragroup Loan Repayment
Borrower Subsidiar
yBank
Bank Loan
Finance and Security Trusts –Employee Benefit Trusts
Employees as
b fi i
Employees as
beneficialbeneficiaries of EBT
beneficial owners of shares
Trustee as
trustee of EBT
Trustee as
nominee
Employer Shares or £
of EBT ee
Shares in Employer
13/07/2014
7
Purpose Trusts – Voting Trusts
I t /b fi i l I t /b fi i lInvestors/beneficial owners
Trustee of Voting TrustEnforcer
Investors/beneficial owners
Company
100% of shares in Company
Purpose Trusts – Payment Trusts
I t /JV P ti I t /JV P tiInvestors/JV Parties
Trustee of Payment TrustEnforcer
Investors/JV Parties
Third Party Contractor
13/07/2014
8
Purpose Trusts – Exit TrustsInsolvent Corporate Structure
Parent Company
Holding Company
Trustee of
Purpose Trust
LenderLoanEnforcer
SecuritySPA re
shares in subsidiari
es
Subsidiaries Security
Potential issues to be aware of
1. Investment Trusts • Trustee’s exposure to risk• Dominion Corporate Trustees Limited & Dominion Trust Limited v Capmark Bank Europe Plc [2010] EWHC 1605 (Ch)
2. Finance and Security Trusts• Nominee holdingsNominee holdings
3. Purpose Trusts• Exit strategy
13/07/2014
9
Thank you
Presented by Victoria Yates
Yates Legal
victoria.yates@yates‐legal.com
01534 481 007
www.yates‐legal.com
Introducing Investment Management
For Professional Advisers Only
"Rule Number One: Never lose money.Rule Number Two: Never forget Rule Number One."
- Warren Buffett
13/07/2014
10
Close Brothers Asset Management Bespoke portfolios are individually tailored to each client. Your appointed fund manager has individual discretion over both asset allocation and individual security selection within your portfolio. The effect of this is that your portfolio and its performance will be specific to you, even when compared to a portfolio with a broadly similar mandate. You should be aware that as a result of individual fund manager discretion, you may outperform or underperform the ‘average’ client portfolio.
This material was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person who may receive it This document is intended for information purposes only It does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation
Important information and risks
receive it. This document is intended for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation or an offer or solicitation and is not the basis for any contract to purchase or sell any investment. Except in so far as liability under any statue cannot be excluded, neither Close Brothers nor any officer, employee or associate accepts any liability (whether arising in contract, in tort, negligence or otherwise) for any error or omission in this document
Issued by Close Brothers Asset Management which is a trading name of Close Asset Management Limited and is part of Close Brothers Group plc. Close Asset Management Limited is registered in England and Wales and authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered number: 01644127. Registered office: 10 Crown Place, London EC2A 4FT.
Strictly private and confidential
Investment management historyPre 1980s laissez-faire environment
1986 Big Bang: end of opaque structure
Strictly private and confidential
Over 100 DFM houses in UK
13/07/2014
11
Investment management options
Do nothing
Do it yourself
Use an investment manager
Strictly private and confidential
Quite simply, we invest for clients to create and preserve wealth. Whilst remaining in cash is often seen as the safest option, it is not going to benefit your clients over the longer term
What do investment managers do?
Manage wealth of private clients as they evolve over time
Investment Objective
Income - Live off capital
Growth - Grow capital
Risk
Lower
Medium
Higher
Unique needs
Jurisdiction
Tax
Currency
Strictly private and confidential
Personal Client Specific
“…Wealthy clients wish to be treated as individuals and not put into a basket…”
The first task of an investment manager? See where the client fits in and devise an appropriate
investment strategy to meet their needs
13/07/2014
12
Choosing an investment manager?
Strictly private and confidential
Choosing the correct manager for your clients is absolutely essential. So what should you, as Trustees, be looking for and what should you know to help you make that decision?
• The philosophy
• The process
• The people
• The product
Philosophy – Active vs. passive
ActiveActive PassivePassiveActiveActiveAims to out perform a
benchmark
Markets are not perfect. Inefficiencies can be exploitedE t l i bl
PassivePassiveAims to match benchmark
Beating the market is foolish.
Strictly private and confidential
Expert analysis enables informed decisions to beat the market Defensive positioning for falling markets
Markets are efficient Low cost optionNo fund manager interference
13/07/2014
13
Philosophy – Direct vs. multi-manager
DirectDirect Multi-managerMulti-managerDirectDirect
Holds individual bonds, equities and alternatives
Aims to take advantage of market opportunities
Multi managerMulti manager
Holds units in funds
No single investment house has a monopoly on skill. E t di if
Strictly private and confidential
Can accommodate variety of specific investment aims and restrictionsPossibility of investor input
Easy to diversify across sectors and investment stylesMulti levels of management and charges
Processes - top down vs. bottom up
Top down:big picture investing Regular
review
Trends, liquidity, currencies and risk are assessed
macro-economic forecast events
Standard frameworkf l ti
In-depthcompany analysis
Company data screening
Whites of the eyes meetings
Strictly private and confidential
for evaluation
Regular review Bottom up:
fundamental company research
13/07/2014
14
The importance of diversificationPerformance of individual asset classes (% in sterling terms)
Best2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Key
UK small cap39.71
Asia ex Japan17.14
Japan41.00
UK small cap20.59
Asia ex Japan29.39
Global Bonds51.52
UK small cap54.27
Gold32.77
Gilts15.57
UK small cap27.82
UK large capFTSE 100 Index
Europe ex UK29.74
Emerging markets bonds
15.02
Commodities36.11
Europe ex UK20.13
Gold27.74
Gold43.86
Asia ex Japan53.82
Asia ex Japan24.39
Gold10.45
Europe ex UK17.82
UK small cap FTSE Smaller Companies index
Asia ex Japan28.69
UK small cap14.00
Asia ex Japan35.60
UK large cap14.43
Emerging markets bonds
16 60
Emerging markets bonds
27 49
UK large cap27.33
Commodities20.50
Global Bonds7.13
Asia ex Japan17.72 World ex UK FTSE World ex UK
Index16.60 27.49
Japan24.67
Europe ex UK13.83
Gold31.4
Asia ex Japan12.63
Europe ex UK15.72
Gilts12.81
Europe ex UK20.09
Japan19.53
UK corporate bonds6.91
UK corporate bonds13.05
US S&P 500 Index
World ex UK20.66
UK large cap11.25
World ex UK24.85
Gold6.73
Commodities14.28
Cash3.92
World ex UK18.86
UK small cap19.52
US2.23
World ex UK11.95 Europe ex UK FTSE World Europe ex
UK Index
UK large cap17.89
Japan8.57
Europe ex UK24.08
World ex UK5.65
World ex UK9.70
Japan1.32
US11.78
Emerging markets bonds
19.07
Cash-0.4
US10.16 Japan TSE TOPIX Index
US15.1
World ex UK7.83
UK small cap22.40
Cash2.72
UK large cap7.36
UK corporate bonds-4.06
UK corporate bonds10.78
US17.97
Emerging markets bonds
-1.18
UK large cap9.97 Asia ex Japan
FTSE World Asia ex Japan Index
Commodities11.72
UK corporate bonds6.68
UK large cap20.78
US0.99
Gilts5.27
Commodities-10.91
Gold9.39
World ex UK16.69
UK large cap-2.18
Emerging markets bonds
9.93Gilts
FTSE British Government All Maturities Index
Gold7.04
Gilts6.60
US16.68
UK corporate bonds0.74
Cash4.22
US-13.39
Emerging markets bonds
7.74
UK large cap12.62
World ex UK-6.12
Japan2.82
UK corporate bonds
iBoxx Sterling Non-Gilts Index
Emerging markets bonds
6.09
US2.76
Emerging markets bonds
16.37
Gilts0.69
US3.14
World ex UK-17.12
Commodities5.87
UK corporate bonds8.38
Japan-11.85
Gilts2.70
Global BondsJP Morgan Global Government N=bond Index
Strictly private and confidential
Portfolio construction is not so simple
Worse
Source: FE, Close Brothers Asset Management as at 5 April 2013
For Professional Advisers Only
UK corporate bonds5.67
Cash2.40
Global Bonds15.94
Emerging markets bonds
-0.71
Global Bonds2.25
Europe ex UK-23.99
Cash-0.27
Global Bonds7.46
UK small cap-12.53
Gold1.42
Emerging markets bonds
JPMorgan Global Emerging Marekts Bond Composite Index
Gilts2.1
Commodities1.27
UK corporate bonds8.99
Commodities-10.47
UK corporate bonds1.81
UK large cap-28.33
Gilts-1.16
Gilts7.20
Commodities-12.68
Global Bonds-0.47 Commodities
Dow Jones UBS Commodities Index
Cash1.58
Global Bonds-2.20
Gilts7.93
Japan-10.48
Japan-6.78
Asia ex Japan-31.01
Japan-6.7
Europe ex UK5.75
Asia ex Japan-12.93
Cash-0.45 Cash FTSE Cash on Deposit
index
Global Bonds-8.07
Gold-2.24
Cash2.67
Global Bonds-11.58
UK small cap-10.55
UK small cap-43.91
Global Bonds-10.38
Cash-0.45
Europe ex UK-14.71
Commodities-5.40 Gold S&P GSCI Gold Total
Rturn
The benefits of income and compounding returns
Source: Bloomberg, 27/06/2014
Strictly private and confidential
13/07/2014
15
Understanding the risks of investing
Country Risk Inflation Risk Market Risk
Strictly private and confidential
Currency Risk Liquidity Risk Short fall Risk
• What is the investors ‘time horizon’?• What type of investments will the investor make?• How much money will the investor need to invest to reach his goals?• Does the investor have short-term financial goals?
Common questions for the client
g• Does the investor have short-term financial needs?• Will the investor need to live off the investment in later years?
Strictly private and confidential
13/07/2014
16
Challenging an investment manager?
Do you have your own money in your fund?
Who is the most important person in your team?Who is the most important person in your team?
How well do you know all your stocks?
How passionate are you about the asset class?
In what kind of market will you do well?
How do you understand risk?
Strictly private and confidential
You claim that you actively manage the portfolio by changing the asset allocation. How do you determine which asset classes aregood or bad?
How do you make investment decisions?
How have you performed throughout a complete market cycle?
Use a financial advisor/ investment managerMake sure you understand your financial circumstances, your tolerance to risk, and your
Get emotionally attached to investments that have served you well in the pastBuy at the top and sell at the bottom
Do’s and Don’ts of investment management
Do Don’t
circumstances, your tolerance to risk, and your long term needs and goals.Invest for the long termTake advantage of cost averaging by making regular investmentsMake sure you only invest in things you understand, and that you understand the basics of investing before going ahead.Review your investment strategy regularly.
Buy at the top and sell at the bottomTry to time the markets, especially equity markets, by frequent short-term tradingRush into investmentsPut all your eggs in one basketMake investments purely on the basis of their tax benefitsPay too much attention to media headlines about successful or less successful investments
Strictly private and confidential
investments
13/07/2014
17
Conclusion
Strictly private and confidential
Taxing TimesWhat Offshore Trustees need to know about UK Taxes
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Michael Hooke & Mark Michael 10 July 2014
13/07/2014
18
Taxing TimesAgenda
• Why use trusts?
• Statutory residence test
• DomicileDomicile
• Typical offshore trust structures and tax considerations
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.35
Taxing TimesWhy use trusts?
• Trusts are a separate legal entity created when an individual (the “Settlor”) transfers his or her assets (the “trust fund”) to another individual or company (the “trustee”) who holds and manages these assets for the benefit of others (the “beneficiaries”) named by the settlor. The trustees are required to act within the rules within the trust deed. A protector may also be appointed to oversee the work of the trustees and has the power to replace them if necessary.
• Trusts are confidential and flexible and carry a number of potential practical benefits:
‒ Succession Planning‒ Privacy‒ Asset Protection‒ Asset Management & Consolidation
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
• Depending on the circumstances, there can also be UK tax benefits.
36
13/07/2014
19
Statutory residence test & domicile
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.37
Taxing TimesStatutory residence test
• It is important for trustees to be able to identify whether settlors and beneficiaries are UK resident / domiciled as this dictates the tax implications which they will need to consider.
• Following approximately two years of consultation, a new statutory residence test came into force on 6 April 2013into force on 6 April 2013.
• Prior to that, residence status had been determined based on a combination of past decisions by the courts and guidelines issued by HMRC. In some circumstances, this led to uncertainty for taxpayers over their status.
• The aim of the test is to set out some more objective criteria and, whilst quite involved, does give all parties concerned more certainty over their position.
• The test has three main constituent parts• The automatic non-UK residence test
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
• The automatic residence test• The sufficient ties test
38
13/07/2014
20
Taxing TimesDomicile
• General Law concept – not defined by statute
• Different from residence
• Affects liability to inheritance tax, income tax and capital gains tax
• An individual is normally domiciled in the country in which he has his permanent or natural home or where he has a ‘settled intention to permanently reside’.
• An individual has one domicile at any one time (and one alone!)Origin - at birth - father’s (or, where illegitimate, mother’s) domicileDependency - on change of father’s (or mother’s) domicile during minority or prior to 1974 domicile of wifeChoice age 16 onwards actively shed domicile of origin/dependency
39
Choice - age 16 onwards – actively shed domicile of origin/dependency
• Domicile is ‘adhesive’ (i.e. difficult to shed).
• Shedding domicile requires severing ties with the old jurisdiction and permanently settling in a new country with the intention to remain there permanently or indefinitely.
• The burden of proof is on the person asserting the domicile status
Taxing TimesDomicile
Deemed domicile
Only relevant for Inheritance tax and is not applicable for income tax or capital gains tax
An individual is deemed domiciled in the UK for IHT if:
• They are actually UK domiciled at any time in the past 3 years; or,• They are UK resident for at least 17 out of last 20 tax years.
Section 267 IHTA 1984
40
13/07/2014
21
Taxing TimesUK resident non-UK domiciled individualsIncome tax
• Taxable on UK source income.• If the remittance basis is claimed, only taxable on non-UK source income if it is
remitted to the UKremitted to the UK.
Capital gains tax
• Taxable on UK source gains.• If the remittance basis is claimed, only taxable on non-UK source gains if proceeds are
remitted to the UK.• Capital payments from non-UK trusts are taxable on the remittance basis, regardless
of the situs of the assets sold by the trustees.
41
Inheritance tax (not deemed domiciled)
• Only liable to IHT on death on, or on transfers of, UK assets.• Transfers of “excluded property” are outside scope of IHT.• Non-UK assets held within a trust established by a non-UK domiciled individual should
be excluded property, even if the individual subsequently becomes deemed domiciled.
Typical offshore trust structuresUK tax considerations
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.42
13/07/2014
22
Taxing TimesUK Tax Considerations
We will analyse some example trust structures in the following slides which will demonstrate the UK tax considerations which it is often necessary to consider.
Th UK t d t hi h ill b d f llThe UK taxes and tax areas which will be covered are as follows:
• Capital Gains Tax (CGT), including the Section 87 regime.• Income tax, including the Non-Resident Landlord Scheme and anti-avoidance
provisions• Inheritance tax (IHT)• Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) • Capital Gains Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (CGTED)
43
Taxing TimesTypical Structure 1
• Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) will be payable by the company as the property is worth £2m+ and is occupied by the settlor (not exempt) – note the reduction in ATED thresholds. Trust
• On sale of the property CGTED will also apply. The increase in the value of the property from 6 April 2013 will attract a 28% tax charge.
• UK Res / Non Dom settlor so s87 TCGA is applicable in respect of rent free occupation. An annual capital payment equal to the annual rental value is deemed to have been paid to the settlor (benefit). The capital payments are matched to capital gains realised in the whole structure, in this case when the property is sold.
UK Res / Non Dom Settlor
Jersey Company
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
• PPR relief would not be applicable on a sale of the property as the property is not held at trust level.
• Inheritance Tax is not applicable as the trust owns shares in an offshore company. As the settlor is non UK domiciled this is ownership of a foreign asset and therefore outside the IHT net.
• The settlor is occupying the property rent free so no income tax is due by the company but note possible shadow director exposure.
44
UK Residential Property £2m+
occupied by Settlor (Rent free)
13/07/2014
23
Taxing TimesTypical Structure 2
• The Jersey company is liable to UK income tax (20%) on net rental income. The company may register to participate in the non resident landlord scheme in order to receive rents gross.
• Returns are due annually by 31 January, payments are due 31 Trust y y y p yJanuary and 31 July.
• UK source income arising in the Jersey company will also be taxable on the settlor (on the assumption they are not excluded from the trust) on an arising basis under s720 but tax credits are available in respect of tax paid by the company.
• ATED and CGTED are not applicable in this case as the property is commercially let (one of the exemptions). The property must not be let to a connected person.
• As for Structure 1 IHT is not applicable as the trustees are
UK Res / Non Dom Settlor
Jersey Company
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
As for Structure 1, IHT is not applicable as the trustees are treated as holding shares in a Jersey company, rather than a UK property.
45
UK Residential Property £2m+
Commercially Let
Taxing TimesTypical Structure 3
• The trustees are liable to UK income tax on net rental income at the rate applicable to trusts (45%).
• The trustees may register with the non resident landlord scheme in order to receive rents gross. Trust g
• The property is not ‘enveloped’ e.g. owned through a company therefore ATED and CGTED are not applicable.
• The settlor (assuming he can benefit from the trust) is taxed on UK income arising in the trust (i.e. from rent of property) but tax credits are available in respect of tax paid by the trustees.
• Inheritance Tax is applicable as the trust owns the property directly i.e. ‘relevant property’. A principal charge is due every ten years from the date of creation of the trust on the value of the property (maximum 6%)
UK Res / Non Dom Settlor
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
the property (maximum 6%)• Section 87 will apply on a distribution from the trust but the
remittance basis will be available even though the trustees will have sold a UK asset.
• CGT not currently applicable for the trustees but may be due under new rules from 6 April 2015.
46
UK Residential Property £2m+
Commercially Let
13/07/2014
24
Taxing TimesTypical Structure 4
• ATED and CGTED are not applicable in this case as the property is not owned by a company
• Inheritance Tax is applicable as the trustees own the property directly i.e. ‘relevant property’. A principal charge is due every Trust y p p y p p g yten years on the value of the property (maximum 6%)
• CGT not currently applicable for offshore trustees; however may be due under new rules from 6 April 2015. PPR relief may be available to exempt the gain provided settlor is allowed to occupy property under the terms of the settlement and it is his/her principal private residence as defined by HMRC.
• As before, s87 TCGA is applicable in respect of rent free occupation. An annual capital payment equal to the annual rental value is deemed to have been paid to the settlor
UK Res / Non Dom Settlor
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
p(benefit). The capital payments are matched to capital gains as they arise, in this case when the property is sold.
47
UK Residential Property £2m+
occupied by Settlor (Rent free)
Taxing TimesTypical Structure 5
• The Trustees will be required to complete a UK trust return and pay tax at the rate applicable to trusts on UK income arising in the portfolio.
• Income may be taxable on the settlor if he is the life tenant of th t t d 624 ITTOIA if it i di ti t t d h
Trustthe trust or under s624 ITTOIA if it is discretionary trust and he can benefit. The remittance basis should apply to non-UK income.
• It is important for the trustees to ensure that the income and gains arising in the portfolio are segregated. Separate accounts should be created, for UK income, for foreign income and for capital and gains. This is important when it comes to paying distributions to the settlor and beneficiaries.
• CGT not applicable as offshore trustees are not liable on i
UK Res / Non Dom Settlor
Portfolio of Shares (UK and Foreign
Investments)
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
gains. • However, s87 TCGA is applicable, matching capital payments
to gains – consideration may be given to timing payments to reduce the cost of the remittance basis charge.
• Inheritance tax may be applicable if the trustees own the UK shares directly i.e. ‘relevant property’. A principal charge is due every ten years on the value of the UK property (maximum 6%)
48
13/07/2014
25
Questions?
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.49
Contact details
• Michael Hooke [email protected] 01183 222521
• Mark Michael [email protected] 01534 824211
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.50
13/07/2014
26
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.co.uk/about for a detailed description of the
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
, g y p p y plegal structure of DTTL and its member firms.
Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom member firm of DTTL.
This publication has been written in general terms and therefore cannot be relied on to cover specific situations; application of the principles set out will depend upon the particular circumstances involved and we recommend that you obtain professional advice before acting or refraining from acting on any of the contents of this publication. Deloitte LLP would be pleased to advise readers on how to apply the principles set out in this publication to their specific circumstances. Deloitte LLP accepts no duty of care or liability for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication.
Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 2 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 (0) 20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7583 1198.
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
‘A T ’ A i lt l P t‘A Tax’ on Agricultural Property
Clive Beer Director
Head of UK Rural Professional Services
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
savills.com
Head of UK Rural Professional Services
13/07/2014
27
Clive Beer – Director
Head of UK Rural Professional Services
Tax Planning
Valuation
Trust Practice
Property Investment
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Land Development
Dispute Resolution / Mediation
Agenda
This talk will include discussion on:
Agricultural Property Relief (APR)
Farmhouses
Buildings & Land
APR cases
Links with Business Property Relief
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
28
APR Criteria
Are you a farmer ?
Do you have a farmhouse and agricultural land ?
Is the farmhouse occupied for the purpose of agriculture ?
Is the farmhouse character appropriate ?
Is the land farmed for agricultural
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
gpurposes ?
Benefit of APR
• 100% or 50% Inheritance Tax relief on the Agricultural Value of all eligible
Agricultural Property
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
29
Is the House a Farmhouse?
“A dwelling for the farmer from which the farm is managed” (Rosser v IRC)
“A farmer is the person who lives in the farmhouse to farm the land comprised in the farm and who farms the land on a day to day
basis” (Antrobus 2)
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Agricultural Property Relief
A typical farmhouse?A typical farmhouse?
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Accepted as a farmhouse and character appropriate on 280 acres
13/07/2014
30
Agricultural Property Relief
Cookhill Priory - the subject of the Antrobus cases
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Agricultural Value and Character Appropriate
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
31
Antrobus 2
Antrobus 1 dealt with the question of Character Appropriateness
But left open the issue of whether agricultural value of the property differed from
its open market value?
Agricultural value was subject of the Antrobus 2 case – Lands Tribunal (2004)
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Antrobus 2 - Conclusion
The Tribunal found:-
A i lt l V l f d i h th ti l k t l d h ill t bAgricultural Value found in hypothetical market – exclude anyone who will not be
farming on a day to day basis i.e. the lifestyle farmer
Hypothetical covenant is more restrictive than that of a standard agricultural
occupancy condition (AOC)
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Rule of thumb:- Agricultural value should be 30% less than market value
13/07/2014
32
Agricultural Property Relief
Rosteague House
Mckenna Case
Not character appropriate to 187 acres
Not a farmhouse due to level of occupier’s
involvement
Rosteague House
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
33
Farm Buildings
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Farm Buildings
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
34
Farm Buildings
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Outbuildings
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
35
McKenna - Conclusion
The Special Commissioners found:-
Rich Man’s Residence
Did not occupy for day to day farming purposes
Not character appropriate
D McKenna and Lady McKenna did not occupy for purposes of agriculture in two
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
years leading up to deaths
Agricultural Property Relief
Golding v HMRC
Classic Smallholding:
Small 3 bedroom farmhouse in poor
condition
Range of buildings in proximity to farmhouse
Land extending 16.29 acres
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
36
Farmhouse Interior
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Approach to Farm
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
37
Traditional Barn
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Agricultural Machinery
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
38
Land
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
39
History
1940: Mr Golding’s parents purchased Blue Gates Farm
Mr Golding worked on the farm for 65 years
- Early years: Range of farming activities
- After death of wife: reduced to some arable and egg production
- No subsidies claimed
Farm remained relatively unchanged
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Livelihood derived from farming activity - Tax returns accepted by HMRC
My Involvement
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
40
Revenue had accepted that the land and buildings qualified for APR
Revenue accepted farmhouse was occupied for agricultural purposes
Revenue’s Position
Revenue accepted farmhouse was occupied for agricultural purposes
However:
Principal reason for denying APR on farmhouse:
- House was not “of a character appropriate” to land and buildings
The area of land accompan ing the ho se as too small
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
- The area of land accompanying the house was too small
Expert Evidence
Civil Procedure Rules
RICS Practice Statement: Surveyors Acting
as Expert Witnesses 3rd edition
“Must be, Must be Seen to be, your
Independent and Unbiased Product, and fall
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
within your Expertise, Experience and
Knowledge”
13/07/2014
41
My Approach
Apply Antrobus Tests
Physical Evidence
Historical Factual Matrix
Finance Test Proved by History
Defra Data – (over 100,000 holdings in England)
Listing Evidence
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Listing Evidence
District Valuers Approach
Settled Cases
Financial
Financial
Financial
Comparable of Sales
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
42
Golding Achievements
Golding confirms that the principles of Antrobus are still alive
Golding has provided clarity and confidence
- If HMRC had won the ‘character appropriate’ test would have been
subject to farming profitability
If so farmhouses would not qualify for APR if poor accounts
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
- If so, farmhouses would not qualify for APR if poor accounts
• Settlement of case – awareness of litigation
Achievements (cont)
Golding secures APR for farmers in the futureg
- Acknowledgement that age can result in lower business turnover and
profitability does not mean a farmhouse will cease to qualify for APR
HMRC did not launch an appeal
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
43
BUSINESS PROPERTY RELIEF
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Business Property Relief
Cannot claim BPR and APR on the same elements of value
APR has priority
BPR may be available on excess market value over agricultural value for Agricultural property. Not generally
available on the farmhouse.
2 year ownership qualifying period
100% or 50% relief
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
44
Farmer v IRC [1999]
Business Property Relief
[ ]
BPR is available on the value of an interest in a business, provided that business
does not consist wholly or mainly of investments
Test requires an overall judgement of the purported business, effectively as to
h th it i ti b i i i l i i t d
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
whether it is an active business or is more passively receiving rents and
investment returns.
Business Property Relief
Balfour Case
• Whittingehame Estate, East Lothian
1907 acres, with Tower House
665 acres in hand farming
917 acres of let farms
308 acres woodland and park
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
26 houses and cottages
2 commercial premises
13/07/2014
45
Upper Tax Tribunal – Balfour Principals
• Lord Balfour carried out the management of the estate both on a day-to-day g y y
basis and in terms of strategic decision making
• Separate trust and farm accounts - consistent with good management practice
• The fact that the trust was a separate entity from Lord Balfour does not mean
that there had to be two separate businesses
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
that there had to be two separate businesses.
• The business should be looked at over a period of time (Farmer v IRC)
Balfour Matrix
IHT Tax Planning Resource
Agricultural Property Relief
Business Property Relief
Factual Matrix
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
13/07/2014
46
Conclusion
Importance of Tax Planning
Case Law Development
No two Farms or Estates are the same
Historic agricultural activity accounted for
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Relationship between APR and BPR
© 2014 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.
Clive Beer, MRICSTelephone: 01952 239511
Mobile: 07967 555654
Email: [email protected]
13/07/2014
47
Leveraging – the market, the opportunities the risks the coststhe opportunities, the risks, the costs.
13/07/2014
48
2007
THE MARKET
Rank Company Country Market cap,US$ billionUS$ billion
1 Bank Of America USA 135.271
2 Citigroup Inc. USA 119.783
3 JP Morgan Chase USA 115.79
4 HSBC UK 114.928
5 Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Japan 81.94
6 Royal Bank Of Scotland Group UK 78.73
7 ING Group Nederlands 78.088
8 Credit Agricole France 77.462
9 Wachovia Corporation USA 69.716
10 BNP Paribas France 67.378
11 Banco Santander Spain 62.072
12 Industrial & Commercial Bank of China China 58.975
13 Barclays Plc UK 53.05
14 Unicredito Italiano Spa Italy 50.726
15 Wells Fargo USA 45.814
16 Deutsche Bank AG Germany 44.142
17 Bank Of China Limited China 44.137
18 China Construction Bank China 42.294
19 Mizuho Financial Group Japan 40.724
20 UBS AG Switzerland 40.703
Rank Company Country Market cap,US$ billion
2013
THE MARKET
p y y US$ billion
1 Industrial and Commercial Bank of China China 235.23
2 China Construction Bank China 204.28
3 Wells Fargo USA 196.39
4 HSBC Holdings UK 195.72
5 JP Morgan Chase USA 185.65
6 Agricultural Bank of China China 150.48
7 Citigroup Inc. USA 136.23
8 Bank of America (BoA) USA 132.66
9 Commonwealth Bank of Australia Australia 115.26
10 Westpac Australia 99.84
11 Royal Bank of Canada Canada 87.4711 Royal Bank of Canada Canada 87.47
12 Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG) Japan 84.72
13 ANZ Banking Group Australia 81.82
14 Itau Unibanco Holding Brazil 80.32
15 Toronto-Dominion Bank Canada 76.65
16 Banco Santander Spain 71.2
17 Goldman Sachs USA 70.4
18 Sberbank of Russia Russia 68.97
19 Bank of Nova Scotia Canada 68.86
20 Banco Bradesco Brazil 68.5
13/07/2014
49
Credit
THE MARKET
NO
Risk
PolicyRegulator
Return
THE MARKET
• PRA• FCA• EBA• Concentration• Hold Limits
Regulators• Bundling
13/07/2014
50
THE MARKET
• Person• Amount• Repayment• Security• Expediency• Remuneration
Credit Risk
• Services
Property
THE OPPORTUNITIES
→ Residential→ London (Prime) / South of England / Rest of UK→ Freehold or Leasehold (sub 50 years)
→ Commercial → Prime / Sub Prime / Secondary / Tertiary / Ground Rents→ Term and Strength of Lease→ Alternative use
→ Development→ Type→ Exit→ Experience
→ Agricultural / Country / Sporting Estates→ Productivity→ Proximity to London→ Listed Property
13/07/2014
51
Stock or ‘Lombard’ / M&A
THE OPPORTUNITIES
Stock or Lombard / M&A→ Liquidity
→ Single or Portfolio→ Global / FTSE / AIM / Unlisted→ Private Equity→ Options / Futures→ Hedge Funds (carry)
→ Regulator→ Exchangeg→ Political Risk→ Capital Restrictions (India / China)
→ Holding Structure→ Legal Status
Alternatives
THE OPPORTUNITIES
Generally non Income producing, therefore who is the underlying client?
→ Metals / Minerals→ Gold→ Platinum→ Jade
→ Aircraft / Yachts / Art / Classic Cars→ Registration→ Authenticity / Provenance→ Security
→ Insurance – JUMBO Life Insurance→ 90% gearing→ Domicile→ £2m plus
13/07/2014
52
THE OPPORTUNITIES
Pensions→ Appropriateness
→ Risk profile
→ SIPPS→ 50% max gearing→ Commercial / Agricultural Property
St k→ Stock
→ SASS
Choosing a bank
THE RISKS
Choosing a bank→ Term of debt
→ Refinance risk
→ Bank Strength→ Tier One Capital→ Basel III
→ Pricing v AUM
→ Bank policyp y
→ Monitoring – covenants→ Regulator monitoring / Market caps→ Forced changes
→ Track record
13/07/2014
53
Risk of Stock or ‘Lombard’
THE RISKS
Risk of Stock or Lombard Do you fully understand the implications of leveraged stock? Could you answer the question to a compliance officer?
Returns can be enhanced, but also losses can be greatly magnified.
→ Investment risk profile
→ LTV
→ Margin Call
→ Top Up Level
→ Additional Pledge
→ Tax
→ Forced sale
→ Capital Gains
THE COSTS
CORRECT STRUCTURE
NEGOTIATE
MANAGE RELATIONSHIP
→ Consider all assets
→ AUM→ Cross products→ Margin v Fee
RELATIONSHIP
COST OF GETTING IT WRONG
→ SWAPS→ Forced Changes
13/07/2014
54
REQUIREMENTSASSETS
CASE STUDIES
Case A – Family TrustREQUIREMENTS→ Additional borrowing of £8m→ Reduction in risk of margin call→ Longer term commitment→ True Private Banking relationship
CHALLENGES→ Inability to pledge further stock→ Low liquidity of single stock
FACILITY SECURED→ 5 year term, margin reduction of 25%→ £20m borrowing facility
Interest only no early redemption penalties
ASSETS→ £80m of single stock→ £20m of mixed property stock→ PG worth in excess of £1bn
INCOME→ Dividend income 95%→ Rental income 5%
PRESENT BORROWING→ £12m→ 2 providers→ Annual revolving facility
ALC has managed the full process including:-
• Bank credit report• Detailed Trustee report
• SOW / AML documentation• Account opening process
→ Interest only, no early redemption penalties→ No PG→ Increase in LTV from 35% to 65%
SECURITY→ Limited number of single stock→ Property assets → PG
13/07/2014
55
Case B – Family Office
CASE STUDIES
REQUIREMENTS→ Borrowing of £50m→ Long term commitment→ True Private Banking relationship
CHALLENGES→ Price volatility→ Custody of asset
FACILITY SECURED→ Top Tier Private Bank→ 5 year term
ASSETS→ £280m of gold bullion→ PG worth in excess of £400m
INCOME→ Business income 80%→ Rental income 20%
PRESENT BORROWING→ Nil
SECURITY y→ Margin above overnight LIBOR with nil custody charges→ Interest only, no early redemption penalties→ No PG or property as security
→ Gold Bullion→ PG
ALC has managed the full process including:-
• Bank negotiations• Secured two offers sub 100 bps margin
• SOW documentation• Account opening process
Case C – Property Portfolio & Trading Business
CASE STUDIES
REQUIREMENTS→ Borrowing of £20m→ Commitment to fund an acquisition→ 16 year amortization profile
CHALLENGES→ Mix of trading and investment assets→ Funding the acquisition of a further trading business→ Complex structure incorporating 13 Ltd Companies
FACILITY SECURED→ 5 year term
ASSETS→ Property assets circa £38m
INCOME→ Rental income→ Trading Income
PRESENT BORROWING→ £16m
SECURITY→ Property 5 year term
→ 16 year amortization profile→ Reduced interest margin
Property→ Debentures
ALC has managed the full process including:-
• Bank negotiations• Managed legal and valuations
• AML and Account opening process
13/07/2014
56
Case D – Property Portfolio & Cash Deposits
CASE STUDIES
REQUIREMENTS→ Borrowing of £18m→ Commitment to fund further property purchases→ Reduction in net costs
CHALLENGES→ Compliance with the tax structure in place→ Agreement to a property “hunting pot”→ Use of two independent lenders
FACILITY SECURED→ 3 and 5 year term
ASSETS→ Property assets circa £17m→ Cash deposits £10m
INCOME→ Rental income
PRESENT BORROWING→ £13m
SECURITY→ Property 3 and 5 year term
→ Interest only facilities→ Reduced net costs and maximum tax benefits
→ Property→ Cash
ALC has managed the full process including:-
• Bank negotiations• Managed legal and valuations
• AML and Account opening process• Working with the Tax Planner
Thank you for your attendance
Sponsored by: