Tucson Streetcar Project...SOP’s to be used during testing and commissioning of the Sun Link system. Sun Link staff will use the information gained during the testing to develop

Tucson Streetcar ProjectTucson Streetcar Project

FTA Quarterly ReviewFTA Quarterly ReviewDecember 19, 2013 • Tucson, ArizonA

iFTA Quarterly Review • December 2013

T able of contents

MEETING AGENDA ..............................................................................ii

Vehicle Production .................................................................................. 1

Operational Readiness .............................................................................3

Project Organization Update ....................................................................7

Master Program Schedule ........................................................................8

Safety and Security ................................................................................ 12

PMP/Sub-Plans Status ........................................................................... 18

Line Segment Construction ..................................................................... 20

Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) Construction ................................. 22

Luis G. Gutierrez Bridge Rail Construction ................................................. 23

Project Budget ...................................................................................... 24

Third Party Coordination/Agreements ....................................................... 29

Other Updates ...................................................................................... 30

Public Involvement ................................................................................ 31

Appendix ............................................................................................. 35

iiFTA Quarterly Review • December 2013

Agenda

Grantee: City of Tucson

Project: Tucson Modern Streetcar Project

Subject: Quarterly Review Meeting No. 16

Date: December 19, 2013

Time: 8:00 am – Noon

Location: 1125 N. Vine

Call in No: 1-866-994-6437 Passcode: 79113985

Participants: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Project Management Oversight Contractor (PMOC), Atkins City of Tucson (COT) Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) The University of Arizona (UA)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

8:00 am Introductions

Opening Remarks

n FTA ........................................................................Leslie Rogers

n City of Tucson ...........................................................Andrew Quigley

n RTA ........................................................................Jeremy Papuga

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

9:00 am Project Status

n Vehicle Production ...................................................Kevin Faulkner

• Schedule, Budget and issues

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

iiiFTA Quarterly Review • December 2013

9:15 am Operational Readiness ...................................................Steve Bethel

n Responsibility Matrix Status

n Integrated Test Schedule and Progress

n Standard Operating/Maintenance Procedures

n Hiring of Operations and Maintenance Staff

n Manuals and Training

n Emergency Drills

n Public Awareness

n Marketing/Promotion

Project Organization Update ..........................................Mike Barton

n Updated Organizational Charts

n O & M Staffing

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

9:30 am Project Master Schedule ................................................Mike Barton

n Status and Issues

n Revenue Service Date

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

9:45 am Safety and Security ......................................................Marwan Al-Muhktar

n SSPP, & SEPP—Plan Development and Implementation Status

n Accident Prevention Procedure Outline

n Coordination with SSO

n Certification Status and Issues

n CIL’s Status and Issues

n Design and Construction Verification Status and Issues

n Preparation for FTA Safety and Security Readiness Review

n mplementation of ADOT’s SSO Program

n PHA and TVA Mitigation

n Construction Safety and Security Plan – Implementation Status – Comparisons to National Averages

ivFTA Quarterly Review • December 2013

9:45 cont’d. State Safety Oversight ..................................................Herman Bernal

n ADOT SSO – Submissions

n ADOT SSO Training 4th Quarter

n ADOT SSO Conferences

n Tucson Meetings and Committees ADOT/SSO Attends

n Tucson Sun Link – Submissions

n System Safety Program Standard and roadmap

n Other Items

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

10:30 am PMP/Sub-Plans Status .......................................... Mike Barton/Steve Bethel

n Plan Submittal Matrix

n PMP – Status and Implementation

n Integrated Systems Test Plan – Status and Implementation

n Rail Activation Plan - Status and Implementation

n Operations and Maintenance Plan – Status and Implementation

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

10:45 am Line Segment/MSF/LGM Bridge Rail Construction ...............Joe Chase

n Scope, Schedule, Budget and issues

n Open Items/Punchlist

n Technical Support for Operations Readiness

Project Budget ............................................................Mike Barton

n SCC Cost Expenditures and Forecasts

n Financial Plan to Support COPs

n Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Funding

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

11:00 am Third Party Coordination/Agreements ..............................Mike Barton

n UA Maintenance and Operation Agreement

n ADOT/COT IGA for O&M

n RTA Operations IGA

Other Updates

n Procurement ............................................................ Victoria Cortinas

n MSF Buy America

n Public Involvement ..................................................... Joan Beckim

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

vFTA Quarterly Review • December 2013

11:15 am Previous & New Action Items ..........................................Tom Kuimjian

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

11:30 am Lunch will be served

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

12:00 noon Adjourn

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

1FTA Quarterly Review • December 2013

Vehicle Production

Status Report ➤ Vehicle

n Design Status

• Design is complete.

• All contract-required drawings have been conditionally approved and the process is moving along well for final approval of all drawings.

• OIW is incorporating all Engineering Change Notifications (ECN’s) into the final drawings.

n Production Status

• Production is approximately 40% complete. All Tucson vehicles are in a state of delivery or production.

• Vehicle 101 arrived in Tucson on August 30, 2013 and vehicle 102 arrived in Tucson October 16, 2013.

• Vehicles 103, 104, 105, 106, 107 and 108 are in final production.

• All manuals have been printed and delivered to Sun Link.

• Operator training was conducted by OIW and Maintenance training is ongoing.

• Vehicle 104 is progressing well and moving into HVAC design conformance testing.

• Due to realignment of the production line, vehicles 103 and 104 will shift delivery times.

• Vehicle 103 is in state 5 and will be in static testing soon; vehicles 106 and 107 are in stage 3. Vehicles 105 and 108 are in state 2.

n Risks

• OIW is currently in production of 3 vehicles for Washington DC. OIW has provided a very aggressive schedule to DC that may not be able to be met. OIW is currently allocating resources to try to mitigate this issue; however, it will impact delivery of the Tucson vehicles.

• Due to the delays in the schedule, the COT has requested and received a letter of assurance from OIW. This letter was discussed in detail on March 6, 2013 with OIW and COT. This discussion will continue as the contract progresses.

• Vehicle 102 has experienced a fault in the surge arrestor in the auxiliary power supply; this may be due to it being undersized. OIW is working very aggressively with Siemens to resolve this issue.


n Contract Activities

• There have been five no-cost change orders processed. No change orders are pending.

• An amendment was completed in July 2012 to add 8th vehicle to the Tucson contract. Orders for propulsion and other major components have been placed with the suppliers. The vehicle is expected to be produced in line with the current production.

• Payment milestones completed in this period included completion of all rooftop equipment, completion of wiring and piping and the shipping release for vehicle 102, and car shell completion for vehicle 107.

• Payment milestones expected to be submitted in the next period are completion of all rooftop equipment, completion of wiring and piping and the shipping release for vehicle 104, and car shell completion for vehicle 108.

Tucson’s history and future came together on October 10, 2013 with Sun Link streetcar 101 being field tested at the base of Sentinel Peak, Tucson’s birthplace.


Status Report ➤ Responsibility Matrix Status

n The final draft of the Responsibility Matrix was issued for release to the PMOC for review on May 24, 2013. The plan was developed to give an overall approach to the schedule and has been developed to fit together with the Rail Activation Plan (RAP) and the System Integrated Test Plan (SITP).

n Sun Link completed 30 of 38 Responsibility Matrix activities in the fourth quarter 2013.

n Sun Link completed 3 of 38 RAP activities in November 2013 for a total of 34 items complete, 5 items are in progress and 4 items ongoing.

n Budget – An Operations and Maintenance budget was developed and submitted to the PMOC on June 14, 2013. There have been no changes to this document.

➤ Integrated Test Schedule and Progress

n The integrated testing schedule is updated weekly on the RAOC agenda.

• Percent of tests complete (# of tests) 64.00%

• Percent of tests complete (original durations) 88.82%

➤ Standard Operating /Maintenance Procedures

n Sun Link is developing draft-testing standard operating procedures (SOPs) during testing and commissioning of the Sun Link system and will provide completed SOPs and the Sun Link Rulebook prior to system readiness testing.

n The following SOPs have been developed and submitted to the PMOC:

operational readiness

101.01 Standard Operating Procedure Manual101.02 Development of Standard Operating Procedures101.03 Document Control and Sign-Off Concurrence 101.04 Emergency Call List101.05 State and Federal Accident Reporting Requirements106.04 Towing Light Rail Vehicle107.01 Handling Disasters and Emergency Occurrences107.02 Medical Emergency Injured or Ill Passenger(s) on Sun Link Property107.03 Coordination with Emergency Response Agencies107.04 Emergency Evacuation


➤ Hiring of Operations and Maintenance Staff

n Sun Link hired the following employees:

• Admin Staff: • 1AdministrativeAssistant• 1Accountant

• Maintenance Staff: • 1Right-of-WayWorker• 1TractionPowerTechnician• 3StreetcarTechnicians

• Operations Staff: • 2OperationsandMaintenance

Supervisors• 2VehicleOperators

➤ Manuals and Training

n Sun Link completed the System Integrated Test Plan (SITP) Volume 1 Rev 2 and submitted to the PMOC on August 23, 2013. Sun Link submitted the SITP Volume 2 Testing Schedule to COT on September 6, 2013. Sun Link started the development of SITP Volume 3 that will contain specific testing and training required for operational readiness. The draft SITP Volume 3 will be completed in December 2013.

n Training continued through the 4th quarter of 2013:

• Training for DLW (MSF) items are the following: • OCSTraining(continuedfrom

August) September 6 & 9, 2013• Re-RailTraining(onedayintheAM)

September 10, 2013• PortableJackLiftTraining(onedayin

the AM) September 11, 2013• CarWashTestandTraining(oneday

in the AM) September 12, 2013• ForkliftTraining–September17,2013• PowerTrackSwitchTraining–

September 30, 2013• CarWashTraining(Maintenance)

September 25, 2013• OperatorVehicleTraining

(Maintenance) September 25, 2013• TractionPowerSubstationTraining

(four days) October 21-27, 2013• UnitedStreetcarVehicleElectrical

Training–October30,2013• PantographTraining–October31,

2013• VehicleHVACTraining(oneandhalf

days) November 19-20, 2013

107.05 Emergency Response Vehicles at Grade Crossing 107.06 Fatality107.07 Accident Investigations107.08 Firearms Onboard a Train, Station or on Sun Link Property107.09 Bomb Threat Aboard a Train or in a Station 107.10 Fire or Smoke (LRV / ROW)107.11 Hijacking or Hostage Situation Aboard a Train107.12 Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) S107.13 Operations & Maintenance Facility Fire Alarm107.14 HAZMAT Spill Response / O&M Facility107.15 Civil Disturbance Procedure107.16 LRV Derailment107.17 SevereWeather–SpecialResponseProcedure


➤ Emergency Drills

n Emergency drills are currently in draft form and are not anticipated to be completed until February 2014. Sun Link staff will work with emergency respondents in the development of these drills.

➤ Public Awareness

n Sun Link staff continues to work with the University of Arizona and the stakeholders and businesses along route to promote safety and education of the Sun Link system. Sun Link has been aggressive with the track access program during this quarter and has trained more than 250 individuals from the city, state and local businesses.

➤ Marketing/Promotion

n Sun Link continues to work with the COT to promote public awareness of the newly constructed streetcar system. Sun Link staff participates in weekly meetings with the COT regarding public outreach and attend special event meetings as requested.

Next Steps ➤ Responsibility Matrix Status

n The Responsibility Matrix is updated in conjunction with the vehicle delivery schedule and construction completion dates. Staffing, training, and the hiring schedule will be adjusted accordingly. The matrix will be monitored to ensure that items in the RAP and SITP master schedule can be adjusted or rescheduled to ensure that the simulated service date is not impacted.

➤ Standard Operating/Maintenance Procedures

n Sun Link has completed the draft Testing SOP’s to be used during testing and commissioning of the Sun Link system. Sun Link staff will use the information gained during the testing to develop the final SOPs to be used by Sun Link employees and will incorporate the changes into the Sun Link Rulebook.


➤ Hiring of Operations and Maintenance Staff

n The Sun Link cleaner position will be filled in December 2013

n The next hiring for O&M supervisors will be in January 2014

n The next hiring for 7 operators will be in March 2014

n The next hiring for 9 operators will be in April 2014

➤ Manuals and Training

n Sun Link has developed a master training schedule as per the mobilization matrix. The master schedule includes information obtained from the manufacturer’s manuals and training documents obtained from the equipment suppliers as required. This information will be used to develop a training syllabus for each discipline. The training schedule is directly impacted by the completion, acceptance and delivery of systems manuals. A copy of the training manual, a copy of the operations training requirements, and a copy of the training documentation was submitted to the PMOC in October 2013.


Organization Update

➤ Updated organization charts are included as appendices.

n Proram Projectn Line Segments and Systemsn Technical/Safety/Securityn Sun Link Operations

➤ O&M Staffing

Project organization update

Below: Secretary of Transportation, Anthony Foxx, visited Tucson on September 11, 2013 to tour the Operations & Maintenance facility and the newly delivered Sun Link streetcar 101.

Lower Left: Installation of public art created by artist, Joe Tyler, at the Broadway and Church Avenue stop.

Bottom: Streetcar 101 traveling to the west side through downtown during daytime testing.


master Program schedule

Status Report

➤ Revenue Service Date

n Revenue operations are unofficially projected for July 16, 2014. This date is dependent on timely delivery of vehicles and completion of acceptance testing.

➤ Status and Issues

n With the exception of the streetcar vehicles, construction and manufacturing contracts are substantially complete, including completion of the Luis Gutierrez Bridge, special trackwork, traction power substations, civil work, line segments, and the maintenance and storage facility. Remaining work primarily includes signage adjustments and punchlist items, as well as remaining testing, documentation and drills that are contingent upon delivery of vehicles.

➤ Project Critical Path

n Vehicle delivery continues to drive the critical path. Vehicles 101 and 102, critical for system integration testing, were delivered on 8/30/13 and 10/16/13, respectively. Timely delivery of remaining vehicles (103 - 108) is needed for final testing, pre-revenue service simulation, and revenue operations. Also considered critical is the two-week minimum for the City of Tucson to test and accept the vehicles after they arrive before streetcars are available for final systems integration testing.

➤ Schedule Revisions

n Due to slippage in vehicle delivery dates, the schedule was analyzed for opportunities to mitigate. According to estimates by Sun Link, vehicle acceptance testing periods were reduced from four weeks to two weeks. The acceptance periods were logically tied so that testing would not inadvertently occur at the same time. Additionally, the preparation period for pre revenue service simulation was reduced from two weeks to one week.

➤ List of Schedule Exhibits (please see appendix)

n Sun Link Tucson Streetcar – Schedule Overview: This exhibit provides an overview of the master program schedule. Timelines presented show the progress of each contractor, concluding with OIW vehicle arrivals and Sun Link system integration testing, pre-revenue simulation, and revenue operations.

n Critical Vehicle Delivery, Acceptance, and Testing: This exhibit shows the critical interaction between vehicle deliveries, City of Tucson vehicle acceptance, and subsequent systems integration testing through pre-revenue service simulation and revenue operations.


Early Milestones

☑ USACE 404 Permit Received November 14, 2010

☑ Tiger Grant Awarded December 27, 2010

☑ FONSI Issued by FTA January 25, 2011

Contractor Notice to Proceed Dates

☑ OIW, Vehicle Manufacturer June 4, 2010

☑ Ashton, Cushing Street Bridge June 20, 2011

☑ Nortrak, Special Trackwork July 7, 2011

☑ BBRI, Traction Power Substations (TPSS) July 12, 2011

☑ OPTW, Civil and Line March 20, 2012

☑ DLW, Maintenance Storage Facility (MSF) April 30, 2012

Crew members unload Sun Link streetcar 102 during the early morning hours of October 16, 2013.


Project Milestones

☑ Luis G. Gutierrez (Cushing Street) Bridge Substantial Completion July 26, 2012

☑ DLW, MSF A3 Pad Complete August 14, 2012

☑ Nortrak, Special Trackwork Deliveries Complete November 15, 2012

☑ BBRI, TPSS Deliveries Complete January 24, 2013

☑ DLW, MSF Partial Substantial Completion (Building) March 28, 2013

☑ Luis G. Gutierrez (Cushing Street) Bridge, Bridge Modifications May 17, 2013 Complete

☑ OPTW, Commissioning of Segment 3 (Milestone 3) June 20, 2013

☑ DLW, Substantial Completion August 14, 2013

☑ OIW, Vehicle 101 Arrives in Tucson August 30, 2013

☑ OIW, Vehicle 102 Arrives in Tucson October 16, 2013

☑ OPTW, Substantial Completion October 21, 2013

☑ OPTW, Line Segment 4 Complete October 25, 2013



☑ OPTW, Line Segment 1 Complete November 8, 2013

☐ Systems Integration - MSF Tests (1 vehicle) August 27, 2013 - December 9, 2013

☐ Full Alignment Tests (1 vehicle) August 26, 2013 - December 30, 2013

☐ Full Alignment Tests (2 vehicles) October 21, 2013 - December 31, 2013

☐ OIW, Vehicle 104 Arrives in Tucson January 10, 2014

☐ OIW, Vehicle 103 Arrives in Tucson January 30, 2014

☐ OIW, Vehicle 106 Arrives in Tucson March 10, 2014


☐ OIW, Vehicle 107 Arrives in Tucson April 4, 2014

☐ OIW, Vehicle 105 Arrives in Tucson April 16, 2014

☐ OIW, Vehicle 108 Arrives in Tucson May 5, 2014

☐ Full Alignment Tests (all vehicles) May 20, 2014 - June 15, 2014

☐ System Integration Drills May 20, 2014 - May 28, 2014

☐ Pre-Revenue Simulation June 15, 2014 - July 15, 2014

☐ Revenue Operations (unofficial projection) July 16, 2014

Left: Sun Link streetcar 101 exits the Operation and Maintenance facility for nighttime testing.

Right: Technicians inside streetcar 101 monitor the vehicle and system during nighttime high speed testing on University Boulevard.


safety and security

Status Report ➤ SSPP and SEPP – Plan Development and

Implementation Status

n The SSPP and SEPP were presented to the PMOC and SSRC at the December 16, 2013 SSRC meeting. The SSPP was submitted to ADOT for review on December 4, 2013 and the SEPP was submitted to ADOT December 11, 2013.

➤ Accident Prevention Procedure Outline

n Sun Link is preparing the document with planned submission to COT, PMOC, and SSRC in February 2014.

➤ Coordination with SSO

n Coordination of plan delivery dates

n Provided courtesy notification and completed investigation report for November 21, 2013 incident.

➤ Certification Status and Issues

n Design Certification

• Complete except for 13 additional MSF items that are still outstanding.

n Construction Certification

• Ongoing

• Cushing Street Bridge - complete

• Alignment, MSF, OCS, TPSS - in progress

n Operations CIL

• A working group has been created to compile the Operations CIL using operations-related items from the following lists:

• PHA• VehicleCIL• ADOTPlans• TVA• DesignCIL• TriennialReviewList

➤ CIL’s Status and Issues

n Alignment

• 91% with 121 of the 133 items reported complete by Construction Administration and 75% verified by Safety and Security Officer.

n MSF

• 100% with 56 of 56 items reported complete by Construction Administration and 96% verified by Safety and Security Officer.

n TPSS

• CIL has been created; items will be certified as information is available.

n OCS

• CIL compilation is in progress.

n Vehicle

• 26% with 259 of 1004 items completed and verified by LTK.


➤ Preparation for FTA Safety and Security Readiness Review

➤ Implementation of ADOT’s SSO Program

n Sun Link & COT met with ADOT and Dovetail Consulting to review new program standard on October 4, 2013.

n Documents (SSPP and SEPP) written according to Program Standard checklist.

➤ PHA and TVA Mitigation

n 9 of 13 open PHA items were addressed at the December 16, 2013 SSRC meeting.

➤ Construction Safety and Security Plan – Implementation Status – Comparisons to National Averages

n Construction safety reports continue to be generated and distributed daily for the Alignment and the MSF construction projects. These are reviewed by the Safety and Security Officer who reports to the SSRC about these activities. The reports provided a cumulative total of events through the end of August 2013.

• 497,726.3 hours worked

• 24 lost workdays due to injury

• 20 restricted workdays due to injury

• 0 workman’s compensation claims (no update)

• 3,640 Safety Meetings

• 6,039 Safety Inspections

• 2 City of Tucson employees reported minor incidents, with no lost time or claims (no updates)

• 15 security incidents, with no financial claims submitted for same

• 68 3rd party incidents, some of which were resident’s rejected claims or claims of no damage

• 0 fatalities

n Fatal occupational injuries, by major event (2012).

• 4% - National Fatality Entries Average (2012)

• 25% Roadway work

• 11% Slip and trip

• 15% Struck by object or equipment

State Safety Oversight ➤ ADOT SSO – Submissions

n Submitted to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Office of Safety and Security: Secondary comments to ADOT SSO Pre-Certification Self Assessment. This document supports the initial certification process for Arizona to receive funding for the SSO Program.

n Developed and submitted to Sun Link: A roadmap of program activities, coordination meetings and required submittals due to ADOT with target dates of completion by Sun Link from year 2013 to 2017.

n Developed and submitted to Sun Link: a roadmap of program activities, coordination meetings and required submittals due to Sun Link from ADOT with target dates of completion from year 2013 to 2017.


➤ ADOT SSO Training 4th Quarter:

n Advanced Rail Incident Investigation.

n National Transit Institute (NTI) All-Hazards Awareness and Preparedness for Transit Employees.

n National Transit Institute (NTI) System Security Awareness for Transit Employees.

n Transit Emergency Response Application (TERA).

➤ ADOT SSO Conferences:

n Arizona’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHP) Safety Summit

n AzTA’s Passenger Rail Conference

➤ Tucson Meetings and Committees ADOT/SSO Attends:

n Four-day working session with Sun Link staff to review Revision 4 of the Arizona Department of Transportation System Safety Program Standard.

n Regular progress meetings with Tucson Modern Streetcar PMOC.

n Attended the Tucson Streetcar familiarization training with Sun Link Staff and Tucson Fire Department.

n Monthly Tucson Modern Streetcar Safety and Security Review Committee Meeting.

➤ Tucson Sun Link – Submissions:

n Sun Link’s first submission of the SSPP IAPP, HMP, AIP, and CAPP - received on December 4, 2013

n Sun Link’s first submissions of the SSEPP - received on December 11, 2013.

➤ System Safety Program Standard and Roadmap

n Minutes from four-day working session with Sun Link staff to review Revision 4 of the Arizona Department of Transportation System Safety Program Standard and roadmap submitted to Sun Link and FTA PMOC for Tucson Streetcar Project.

➤ Other Items:

n Conference call with the FTA Office of Safety and Security, ADOT SSOA and legal department to review Pre-Certification Self-Assessment.

n ADOT hosted Safety and Security Training for Sun Link, Sun Tran and other transit employees on November 13, 2013. Training consisted of All-Hazard Awareness and Preparedness for Transit Employees and System Security

Awareness for Transit Employees.

n The ADOT SSO was added to the Operation Lifesaver board on November 14, 2013.

A view from behind the driver’s seat of streetcar 101.


Documents Version / Submittal

Date

Status Next Steps

Safety and Security Certifica-tion

Design–wassubmitted to the PMOC on February 28, 2013.

Overall design certification completion achieved through this quarter is 100% complete of the 1009 item list. An additional 13 items were added for communication elements, of which three are complete. Design certification was submitted to the PMOC.The construction certification checklist for the Cushing Street Bridge element is 100% complete with 139 items completed. The Certification is in the review and signature stage.The design safety certification checklist for the TPSS is 100% complete. The Design Criteria Conformance Checklist has been signed by the TDOT Director and submitted to the PMOC.Certifiable Items List has been completed for the alignment construction and the MSF construction. The Construction Certification Checklist for the alignments is 23% with 30 of the 133 items reported and the Construction Certification Checklist for MSF is 82% with 46 of 56 items reported, and 75% verified.A Certifiable items list has been created for the TPSS and will be updated as documentation is available.

Design Certification of the 13 additional MSF items is ongoing.Construction Certification continues on the Alignment and MSF projects.

PHA Status

Final PHA draft was submitted to the SSRC and PMOC on September 26, 2013 and was submitted to ADOT for review.

The PHA was reviewed by the Sun Link Safety and Security Officer and was re-submitted to the PMOC.Rev D of the Vehicle PHA was submittedbyUSCandisunderreview.Operational PHA was developed through a working session of the Fire, Life, and Safety subcommittee and is under review by the SSRC.

The PHA is a living document and continues to be reviewed, with mitigations being tracked and updates and additions to be undertaken as they develop.Sun Link Safety and Security Officer continues to follow up with SSRC on clarification on items requested by some members.



Date

Status Next Steps

Threat and Vulnerabil-ity Assess-ment

Rev 2 was submitted which addressed previous PMOC comments in May 2012.

TVA, Rev 2 was accepted by the PMOC.TVA continually reviewed toward ensuring that all vehicle security elements are included.

The TVA is a living document and continues to be reviewed, with mitigations being tracked and updates and additions to be undertaken as they develop. An MSF specific TVA was conducted with Tucson Police, SWAT, and Fire on May 7, 2013. The report has not yet been received.

Construc-tion Safety Implemen-tation

The City of Tucson Construction Safety and Security Plan for the alignment and MSF construction was submitted in March 2012.

The revised Construction Safety and Security Plan was determined by the PMOC to be acceptable.Contractor safety and security plans were accepted by the SSO.Construction safety audits were initiated.Construction certification for the alignment, MSF, OCS, and TPSS are underway.Construction safety and security reports are reviewed monthly.

Construction Safety Activities will continue until construction is complete for all elements. Construction certification will continue until complete. Ongoing participation in construction meetings, construction safety and security sessions, audits and inspections will continue.Inspections and audits will continue.

Vehicle Safety Documents

First draft of Vehicle FMECA was submitted and reviewed for informational purposes in July 2012. Rev B, Vehicle Safety Plan was received, reviewed and accepted by the vehicle technical consultant in June 2013.

Rev B of the Vehicle FMECA was conditionally approved by the vehicle technical consultant in November 2012 and distributed to the SSRC.Rev B of the Vehicle FEMCA was revised per COE-680 and resubmitted for approval on May 17, 2013.Construction Safety CILs for the vehicle are 26% complete with 259 of 1004 items completed.

The SSO, safety and security technical team and the vehicle technical consultant continue to work with OIW and ongoing review of all RAMS will continue until complete.



Date

Status Next Steps

System Safety Program Plan

Sun Link has provided a bulleted outline of the document in a slide show presented during the PMOC visit on May 22 and 23, 2013.

Sun Link is preparing the document with planned final submission on December 31, 2013. The SSPP will be presented to the SSRC members at the December meeting.

Security and Emergency Prepared-ness Plan

Sun Link has provided a bulleted outline of the document in a slide show presented during the PMOC visit on May 22 and 23, 213.

Sun Link is preparing the document with planned final submission on December 20, 2013. The SEPP will be presented to the SSRC members at the December meeting.

Accident Prevention Plan

Sun Link has provided a bulleted outline of the document in a slide show presented during the PMOC visit on May 22 and 23, 2013. A sample section will be presented at the December Quarterly.

Sun Link is preparing the document with planned submission to COT, PMOC, and SSRC in February 2014.

Operations CIL

A working group has been formed to compile the CIL.

The group will continue to compile Operations CIL items, then review the list and begin verification of items. The Operations CIL is expected to be completed by April 2014.

Streetcar 101 traveling through downtown for the first time during daytime hours.


PmP/sub-Plans status

Status Report ➤ Plan Submittal Matrix

➤ PMP – Status and Implementation

n The PMP was updated to include detailed development of the systems startup, testing and operations plan. Rev 10 of the PMP was submitted to the PMOC on August 16, 2013 for review.

➤ Integrated Systems Test Plan Status and Implementation

n Sun Link completed the System Integrated Test Plan Volume 1, Rev 2 on August 22, 2013 and submitted the document to PMOC for review on August 23, 2013. Volume 2 was submitted on August 30, 2013. Sun Link started the development of SITP Volume 3 that will contain specific testing and training required for Operational Readiness. It is expected that the draft SITP Volume 3 will be completed in December 2013.

n Sun Link continues to review the testing requirements for Systems Integrated Testing that includes sequencing of scheduled tests, duration of each test and tests that are missing or need to be modified.

➤ Rail Activation Plan – Status and Implementation

n The Rail Activation and Operations Committee (RAOC) continues to review and approve documents, responses to the PMOC and schedule.

n Sun Link continues to hold RAOC meetings on a weekly basis to ensure that all parties involved understand the integration testing process. Meeting attendees include Sun Link Operations and Maintenance, Engineering and Construction, Safety, Security and Quality Assurance Departments, other Sun Link consultants, and the contractors at all levels.

n Substantial completion for construction was received on October 21, 2013.

n Sun Link completed 2 of 85 RAP activities in December for a total of 34 of 83 items complete. In addition, Sun Link has 4 ongoing RAP activities and 5 in progress.

n The Rail Activation Plan draft review was completed on May 1, 2013. The draft RAP was submitted to the PMOC on May 22, 2013.


➤ Operations and Maintenance Plan – Status and Implementation

n Sun Link received the current Operations and Maintenance Plan, Rail Activation Plan, Systems Integrated Test Plan and Systems Integrated Test Procedures documents and completed the initial review of them on March 12, 2013.

n The Operations and Maintenance Plan will be revised as soon as all manuals, training deliverables and streetcar vehicles have been delivered. It is expected that the plan will be completed in March 2014.

Right: Public art created and installed by artist Joe Tyler celebrating Arizona’s centennial birthday.

Below: Streetcar 101 exiting the 4th Avenue Underpass during daytime testing.


L ine segment construction

Status Report ➤ Line Segment Progress

n Percent complete – 105% (Monthly pay estimate through October)

n Conditional Substantial Completion issued as of October 21, 2013

➤ Construction Administration (CA) Activities:

n CA team is coordinating construction safety and security checklist status with operations team on a monthly basis. Checklist is approximately 77% complete.

n CA team (RE/Construction Safety Representative) attends weekly Rail Activation and Safety and Security meetings.

n Electrification pre-activity meetings are as needed.

n Safety briefings held prior to testing activities.

➤ Segment No. 1

n Minor punch-list items are being completed.

n JOC to install “skateboard” cleats on Luis G. Gutierrez (Cushing Street) Bridge in December 2013.

➤ Segment No. 2

n Minor punch-list items being completed.

n Signage adjustments on-going.

n JOC work completed (catch basin modifications, ramps).

➤ Segment No. 3

n Minor punch-list items being completed.

➤ Segment No. 4

n The Warren Avenue Underpass, which was closed to public use pending the installation of a security fence through the underpass, opened the last week of November 2013. Final adjustments to the security fence will be completed in December 2013.

n Minor punch-list items on-going throughout.

n Minor signage adjustments on-going.

n Train signage adjustments on-going.

➤ Technical Support for Operations Readiness


Next Steps

➤ Line Segment Progress

n Line Segment 1:

• Complete minor punch-list items.

• JOC contractor to install “skateboard” cleats to concrete benches and barrier walls.

n Line Segment 2:


• Provide adjustments to street signs.

n Line Segment 3:


n Line Segment 4:

• Conduct final acceptance testing of test signals at Warren Avenue and 2nd Street.

• Complete final bracing for the new security fence at the Warren Avenue Underpass.

• Install additional LED warning signs at theWarrenAvenueUnderpass.

• Begin Landscape Establishment for landscape work at Warren Avenue and Helen Street.


Streetcar 101 passes the historic Hotel Congress for the first time during nighttime testing.


Status Report

100% Complete

➤ MSF Progress

n Current Activities

➤ Contracts

n Total completed to date, up to and including Change Order No. 7: $8,196,256.07

n Anticipated future change orders total approx. $101,502.

n Potential claims for Buy America equipment and Extended General Conditions total $409,999.

➤ Open Items/Punch-list

n Portable Lift Acceptance

➤ Technical Support for Operations Readiness

maintenance and storage Facility (msF) construction

Right: Streetcar 102 was successfully delivered during the early morning hours of October 16, 2013.

Below: Streetcar 101 in the Operations & Maintenance Facility yard.


Luis G. Gutierrez (LGG) bridge rail construction

Status Report ➤ City negotiating final change order and

quantities. Final pay estimate in process.

➤ JOC contractor to add preventative “skateboard” cleats to existing benches and barrier wall in December.

Streetcar 101 travels over the Luis Gutierrez Bridge.


Project budget

Status Report

➤ SCC Cost Expenditures and Forecasted Schedule

n To estimate the forecasted cost at completion, each line item was updated to reflect any corresponding change order, potential or executed, and cost pressures to the associated cost category by WBS and SCC code.

n Line items are tracked for variance between the forecast values and COT Program Budget.

➤ Financial Plan to Support COPs

n The Cash Flow Projection, by Contract and SCC code, was updated to forecast when alternative funding may be needed.

➤ Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Funding

n The City of Tucson has developed a five-year Transit Plan and is in the process of identifying other potential funding sources.

Next Steps

➤ Data will continue to be analyzed to identify trends and other potential cost pressures as we continue to work on closing out contracts.

Right: Inside the streetcar

101 during high speed testing.

Below: Streetcar on-track testing

in the Warren Avenue

underpass.


Rev.

12/1

1/13

Versi

on 1Co

st P

er M

ajor

Con

tract

Pack

age

All B

udge

ted D

ollar

Value

s Bas

ed on

Mon

th En

ding O

ctobe

r 31,

2013

Work

in P

rogr

ess

$ 0

$ 10,

000,

000

$ 20,

000,

000

$ 30,

000,

000

$ 40,

000,

000

$ 50,

000,

000

$ 60,

000,

000

= Ex

pend

iture

to D

ate

= Bu

dget

Rem

aini

ng

Proj

ect B

udge

t – $

196,

531,

000

Tota

ls

= M

ajor

Con

trac

t Pac

kage

Com

plet

ed

$ 70,

000,

000

$ 40,6

36,67

1$ 37

,389

,211

$ 62,2

45,95

5$ 1,

626,

681

$ 8,55

2,24

5$ 6,

471,9

13$ 1,

361,2

00$ 3,

880,

003

$ 8,75

1,681

$ 23,8

09,98

5$ 1,

805,

455

$ 1,62

6,68

1

$ 59,7

75,2

33

$ 2,4

70,7

22

Line

Seg

men

tCo

nstr

uctio

n

$ 8,64

3,48

5

Luis

G.

Gut

ierr

ez(C

ushi

ng S

t.)Br

idge

$ 0H2O MainRelocation

$ 8,3

28,7

64

$ 223

,481MSF

$ 1,80

5,45

5

Spec

ial

Trac

k

Vehi

cles

Engi

neer

ing

$ 14,93

7,267

Com

mun

icat

ion

Syst

ems:

TPSS

,O

verh

ead

$ 1,24

8,205

$ 22,4

51,94

4

Publ

icAr

t/RO

W

$ 469

,157

$ 2,63

1,798

$ 3,23

4,997

EGR

Serv

ices

(Des

ign,

PM, C

A)

$ 37,4

01,67

4

Cont

inge

ncy/

Ow

ners

Rese

rve

$ 4,6

52,7

50

Star

t Up

& Te

stin

g

$ 0

$ 23,8

09,98

5$ 10

8,196

$ 892,

043

$ 1,81

9,163


Rev. 12/10/13Version 1

$0

$20,000,000

$40,000,000

$60,000,000

$80,000,000

$100,000,000

$120,000,000

$140,000,000

$160,000,000

$180,000,000

$200,000,000

$19,627,000 – Local$3,000,000Local TIP(Secured)

$8,379,000 – Tucson Water

$14,155,000 – Luis G. Gutierrez Bridge

$5,980,000 – FTA NS

$63,000,000 – FTA TIGER Grant

$75,000,000 – RTA

$190,000Pima Sewer

$3,200,000 – Gadsden Contribution

$57,499,430 – RTA

$2,342,226 – Local TIP

LocalLocal (Secured)COT WaterPima Sewer

GadsdenContribution

Luis G. GutierrezBridge

FTAFTA TIGER GrantRTA

Original Funding Amount Expenditures to Date

$63,000,000 – FTA TIGER

$2,715,789 – Local

$5,980,000 – FTA NS

$12,506,163 – LGG Bridge

$7,975,704 – TW

$73,006 – Pima Sewer

$4,000,000 – FTA HPP Funds

$3,774,035 – FTA HPP

FTA HPP Funds

Funding Sources vs. Expenditures to DateSource Document FTA-Approved Finance Plan October 31, 2013Work in Progress


Rev.1

2/10

/13

Versi

on 1

Cost

Per

Maj

or S

CC C

ontra

ct Pa

ckag

eAl

l Bud

geted

Doll

ar Va

lues B

ased

on M

onth

Endin

g Octo

ber 3

1, 20

13Wo

rk in

Pro

gres

s

$ 0

$ 10,

000,

000

$ 20,

000,

000

$ 30,

000,

000

$ 40,

000,

000

$ 50,

000,

000

$ 60,

000,

000

SCC

20St

atio

ns,

Stop

s &

Term

inal

s

SCC

10G

uide

way

& T

rack

Elem

ents

SCC

40Si

tew

ork

& S

peci

alCo

nditi

ons

SCC

30Su

ppor

tFa

cilit

ies

SCC

50Sy

stem

s

SCC 60ROW, Land,Existing Improvements

SCC

70Ve

hicl

es

SCC

80Pr

ofes

sion

alSe

rvic

es

SCC

90Co

ntin

genc

y/O

wne

r'sRe

serv

e

SCC

100

Fina

nce

Char

ges

Tota

ls$ 47

,958,

584

$ 37,3

89,2

11$ 18

,776

,433

$ 9,64

8,80

2$ 39

,296

,684

$ 16,8

62,62

2$ 23

,809

,985

$ 511,2

00$ 2,

277,4

79$ 0

$ 342,

753

$ 1,25

6,81

7

$ 1,02

0,66

2$ 87

8,66

7

$ 39,2

96,6

84 $ 0$ 1,

808,

478

$ 153,2

00$ 35

8,00

0

$ 22,4

51,94

4

$ 14,93

7,267

$ 39,95

9,680

$ 7,99

8,904

$ 23,8

09,98

5

$ 0

= Ex

pend

iture

to D

ate

= Bu

dget

Rem

aini

ng

Proj

ect B

udge

t – $ 19

6,53

1,00

0

$ 18,4

33,6

80

$ 8,77

0,135

$ 15,0

54,14

4


Cash

Flow

Pro

jectio

nAl

l Bud

geted

and P

rojec

ted D

ollar

Value

s Bas

ed on

Mon

th En

ding O

ctobe

r 31,

2013

Work

in P

rogr

ess

Rev.

12/1

2/13

Versi

on 1

$ 0

$ 50

Mil

$ 100

Mil

$ 150

Mil

$ 200

Mil

$ 250

Mil

Janu

ary 2

013

July

2012

April

2013

April

2012

Octo

ber 2

013

Octo

ber 2

012

July

2013

Janu

ary 2

014

April

2014

July

2014

= Lo

cal

= RT

A=

ARRA

/Fed

eral

= Ex

pend

iture

to D

ate

= Fu

ndin

g M

axes

out

at t

his

poin

t

$ 137

,184,

534

$ 140

,925

,736

$ 145

,376

,240

Ap

ril

2013

( FTA

TIG

ER)

Feb

ruar

y 20

14( R

TA)

$ 56,1

59,13

2$ 4

2,20

0,90

3$ 4

3,32

2,152

$ 75,

566,

849

$ 71,

869,

569

$ 56,

790,

729

$ 66,

501,

681

*

$ 106

,572

,496

$ 98,

211,

224

$ 92,

987,3

99$ 8

4,23

7,951

$ 110

,294

,695

$ 118

,503

,129

$ 135

,835

,235

$ 129

,320

,333

$ 121

,268

,462

* Es

tim

ated

Rev

enue

Ser

vice

Jul

y 20

14

° T o

tals

exc

lud

e co

sts

incu

rred

in

adva

nce

of P

relim

inar

y En

gin

eeri

ng


Third Party coordination/Agreements

Status Report ➤ UA Maintenance and Operation Agreement

n Essentially complete; Approval at Mayor and Council is planned for December 17, 2013.

➤ADOT/COT IGA for Maintenance and Operations

n Essentially complete; the revised document has been provided to ADOT for approval.

➤RTA Operations IGA

n RTA is evaluating the O&M IGA based on their current cash flow and policies. This IGA is still being evaluated by RTA.

Above: Public art created and installed by artist Joe Tyler, celebrating Arizona’s 5 C’s (cactus, copper, cattle, citrus and cotton).

Left: Technicians measure the gap between the bridge plate and curb of a stop to ensure it is has appropriate clearance.


other updates

Status Report ➤ Procurement

n Solicitations

• Transit Advertising awarded to Lamar Transit Advertising on October 15, 2013

• NamingRightsRFP–DuedateDecember 30, 2013

• Sanding Cart

n Vehicles

• Monitoring vehicle delivery and LD’s

n Line Segment Construction

• Cathodic Protection Claim

• Davis Bacon

• SingleAccountAudit

n MSF

• Change order for time extension

n Contract Close-Out

• Luis G. Gutierrez Bridge (Cushing Street), TPSS and Special Track

➤ MSF Buy America

n Specified as an acceptable alternate; Railquip equipment did not meet the Buy America requirement. Contractor has submitted a claim for reimbursement of added cost to procure Macton equipment. This includes Portable Lifts (not yet accepted) and rail turntables (installed).

Vehicle turntables inside the

Operations and Maintenance Facility


Public involvement

Status Report ➤ Planned, coordinated with project

team, wrote talking points for speakers, produced materials and held a public event on September 6, 2013 to dedicate the Operations & Maintenance Facility and showcase streetcar 101. More than 350 members of the public, dignitaries and elected officials were in attendance.

➤ Documented September 6, 2013 public event with video and still photos. Posted to website and social media group pages.

➤ Facilitated media coverage of September 6, 2013 public event.

➤ Coordinated tour of Operations & Maintenance Facility for dignitaries and elected officials prior to September 6, 2013 public event.

➤ Coordinated materials and tour of Sun Link streetcar route and Operations & Maintenance Facility for U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Anthony Foxx, on September 11, 2013.

➤ Coordinated with Oregon Iron Works/United Streetcar to promote arrival of streetcar 102 through social media.

➤ Facilitated media coverage of the arrival of the streetcar– October 16, 2013.

➤ Documented streetcar 102 arrival with video and still photos and posted to social media group pages.

➤ Coordinated with locally based research firm to develop and launch online expanded “Operations Preferences Poll” to businesses along the route.

n 464 email surveys sent with 130 responses, 51 in person surveys administered, select groups forwarded to their electronic distribution lists: 28% response rate.

➤ Coordinated with MainStreet Business Assistance Program to administer expanded “Operations Preferences Poll” in-person to businesses and organizations along the route.

➤ Provided graphics, images, brochures and other materials for information booth at Tucson Meet Yourself festival (October 11-13, 2013). More than 1500 people visited the booth during the festival.

➤ Coordinated streetcar 101 static display for November 15, 2013 and November 22, 2013 University of Arizona (UA)” Bear Down Friday” community pep rallies.

➤ Provided information and public outreach for vehicle testing activities.

➤ Developed testing infographic and fact sheet on streetcar.

➤ Photographed testing activities to document project progress, post to Facebook, and refresh website content.

➤ Produced short videos of streetcar testing to post to project YouTube and social media group pages.


➤ Distributed and promoted multimodal, bilingual “Streetcar Street-Smart” public safety education campaign materials, including, posters, brochures, videos, and website content.

➤ Partnered with University of Arizona (UA) Parking and Transportation Department to promote Streetcar Street-Smart Public Safety Education Campaign to on-campus groups.

➤ Provided talking points, images and graphics, and organized tour of route for Vegas 7 magazine representatives for upcoming article featuring Sun Link Streetcar.

➤ Provided article and fact sheet highlighting Sun Link for Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities monthly newsletter.

➤ Provided Streetcar Street-Smart public safety education materials and image with embedded link to Sun Link website for City of Tucson Bicycle and Pedestrian Program monthly newsletter.

➤ Provided talking points and information for pre-recorded radio spot featuring Sun Link that aired on local radio.

➤ Researched nationwide best practices and compiled information to begin planning Sun Link How to Ride campaign.

➤ Developed informational materials displayed at Arizona Transit Association Conference (November 14-15, 2013).

➤ Participated in Urban Land Institute downtown Tucson planning charrette (November 17-22, 2013).

➤ Developed informational materials and graphics for 2014 Tucson Gem, Mineral and Fossil Showcase.

➤ Established Revenue Service Kick-off Event Committee to plan Sun Link opening ceremonies and public event.

➤ Routinely posted updates and pictures on Twitter and Facebook group page.

➤ Added 248 new Facebook “fans,” and 233 new Twitter “followers,” during the months of September, October and November 2013.

➤ Coordinated with local freelance journalist to highlight positive benefits of the Sun Link system.

➤ Coordinated with residences and businesses via one-on-one contact, informational materials, and e-blasts to prepare them for construction activities and construction-related traffic impacts.

➤ Emailed weekly update e-blasts to approximately 2475 contacts including the Community Liaison Group, public officials and interested parties.

➤ Responded to inquiries from other cities building similar projects.

➤ Responded to public and media inquiries about the project.

➤ Updated PIP documentation.

➤ Produced PowerPoint and coordinated project team member involvement for the following presentations:

n September 5, 2013 Ward 6 Special Event Discussion

n September 11, 2013 Old Pueblo Business Alliance

n September 11, 2013 Fourth Avenue Merchants Association

n September 18, 2013 University of Arizona Bicycle and Pedestrian Council


n September 19, 2013 Institute of Management Accountants

n September 23, 2013 UA Housing Board Corporation

n September 24, 2013 Tucson Sunset Rotary

n October 1, 2013 UA Dean of Students Office

n October 8, 2013 UA Campus Community Relations

n October 10, 2013 Rincon Rotary Club

n October 11, 2013 Tucson Meet Yourself

n October 22, 2013 Railvolution Conference

n October 28, 2013 NACTO Conference

n October 30, 2013 UA Project Management Class

n November 6, 2013 HUD Sustainable Communities Roundtable

n November 8, 2013 UA College of Pharmacy Homecoming (information booth)

n November 14, 2013 Blenman Elm Neighborhood Association

n November 15, 2013 UA Institute of Electric and Electronics Engineers Student Chapter

n December 4, 2013 UA Geography 371 Class

n December 5, 2013 Visit Tucson

➤ Coordination, Outreach and Meetings with Interested Parties

n Best Practices Committee meeting

n Sun Link Revenue Service Kick-off Event Committee meetings

n Sun Link Streetcar project schedule coordination meetings

n Safety and Security and Rail Activation

Oversight Committee meetings

n Coordination with UA to develop outreach campaign for students, faculty, and associated entities – Arizona Health Sciences Center, Greek Life Organizations, and Research Facilities

n Regular communication meetings with public information officers regarding outreach needs and opportunities

n Outreach to Downtown Partnership, Fourth Avenue Merchants Association, Main Gate Square, advocacy groups, key business leaders and decision makers supporting the Sun Link project and its benefits

Streetcar 101 travels down Congress Street during nighttime testing.


➤ Schedule Status

n Public involvement activities remain on schedule in tandem with the project schedule.

n Upcoming activities include:

• Promote arrival of streetcar 103 and 104.

• Schedule media and photo opportunities.

• Analyze Operations Preferences Poll to provide recommendations for operations and service. Follow-up contact with respondents who requested further information.

• Facilitate business outreach focus groups.

• Promote public art and artists.

• Announcement of project milestones and public celebrations.

• Outreach to businesses and residents affected by testing-related activities.

• Document and photograph testing activities.

• Preparation of testing information materials.

• Develop “How to Ride” campaign materials.

• Continued planning of Revenue Service Kick-off events.

• Presentations and Speaker Bureaus

• December10,2013Sun Tran Board

Next Steps ➤ Public Education

n Develop traditional and ‘non-traditional’ collateral project materials to reach a diverse audience.

n Develop a visual campaign, customized to our community’s multi-cultural audiences: brochures, fact sheets, project updates, maps/displays, YouTube/streaming videos, Facebook Group page and Twitter posts, simulations, tours, and Public Service Announcements.

➤ Advocacy and Grassroots Outreach

n Continue to coordinate with project advocates and area stakeholders to build positive community buzz about the streetcar.

➤ Media Communications

n Media coordination to support milestone events, testing activities, and public safety education campaign.

Streetcar display at University of Arizona “Bear Down Friday”

community pep rally.


Appendix

Route Map

Org Charts

Schedule Overview Exhibit

Critical Vehicle Delivery and Testing

Budget Charts

5 Year Transit Plan

MR Submittal Schedule

2012 National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries

ADOT Rollout Minutes and Road Map


TUCSON MODERN STREETCARRoute with Stops

Broadway

Eucl

id A

ve.

Park

Ave

.

Downtown

4th AvenueBusiness District

The University of Arizona

Arizona Health Sciences

Center

Main GateSquare

Congress St.Congress St.

Broadway Blvd.

Ave

nida

del

Conv

ento

Linda Ave.

9th St.

7th St.

5th St.

2nd St.

University Blvd.

Helen St.

Chur

ch A

ve.

Ston

e Ave

.6t

h Av

e.

War

ren

Ave

.

▲

N▲

Mercado

Cushing St.

▲

210Ca

mpb

ell A

ve.

University Blvd.

6th St.

Speedway Blvd.

6th

Ave.

4th

Ave.

Ston

e Av

e.

Sant

a Cr

uz R

iver

5th

Ave.

8th St.

6th St.

4th St.

MAP LEGENDSun Link Streetcar Route

Stop

Maintenance & Storage Facility

Luis G. Gutierrez Bridge10


LTina GoodacreAdministration

Support

Shellie GinnProgram Manager

Mike BartonPMC Project Manager

See Technical/Safety/SecurityOrganization Chart

JoAnn WilliamsControls Manager

Nate MeddingsSchedule/Cost Control

Victoria CortinasMatt Hausman

Design &Construction

Marcheta GillespieDirector

Britton DornquastRTA MainStreet

Media & Community

RelationsSafety and

Security Procurement

Ricardo PargasDeputy Project

Manager

Matthew TauntonEnvironmental

Manager

Frank PiersonSystems

Laura JestingsVictoria Cortinas

Vehicle & Commodity

Program ControlsFTA Coordination& Environmental

Monitoring

Joan BeckimPublic Involvement

Joshua WeaverPublic Involvement

Joe ChaseConstruction

Manager

Bob BartonDavis BaconCompliance

Lianna PerezDirector

Rachel SchmidDocument Control

Glen CarterSchedule Control

Rich FoitikTDOT/Admin Support

Roy CuaronTDOT Finance

Manager

Financial/ContractAdministration

Blanca EspinoContract

Administration

Tim MurphyReal Estate Manager

Hector MartinezDirector

Real Estate

Jeanette FreyCost Control

Jim RossiReal Estate Manager

Paul LoomisRTA

Andrew McGovernEngineering Manager

Design Oversight

Rob GarciaUtilities

Terry NashEngineering

Manager

Paul LoomisRTA

Kevin FaulknerContract

Representative

Vehicle Oversight

Werner UttingerOversight

Meron (Mark) BarbarashOversight

See ConstructionOrganization Chart

Construction Administration

DESIGN CONSULTANTS

URS (Civil/Track)AMEC (Cushing Street Bridge)

LTK (Systems)GLHN (MSF)

HDR Architecture (Stops)

Bobby LallQA Auditor

O�ce ofEqual Opportunity

Programs

Jonathan MabryHistorical

Preservation Officer

Mike GrahamPublic Information

Officer

L E G E N D

COT StaffRTA StaffPMC StaffConsultantSun Link

Rail Activation CommitteeCarlos de Leon – Deputy Director TDOT

Shellie Ginn – City of Tucson DOTJohn Zukas – City of Tucson DOT

Kevin Faulkner – Sun TranMike Barton – HDR/PMC

Rail Activation

Cleve ClevelandRail Activation

Committee Manager

Michele JosephSun Tran Marketing

Sheila StormRTA Marketing

Tiffany HochardARRA Reporting

Jorge SalgadoDBE Compliance

John ZukasTDOT Contract/

Compliance Oversight

Ricardo PargasDeputy Project Manager

Tucson Modern StreetcarExecutive Management Team

Daryl Cole – TDOT

Andrew Quigley – COTJeremy Papuga – PAG

Carlos de Leon – TDOT

TUCSON MODERN STREETCARProgram Project Organization Chart

December 2013Project Organization Update


L E G E N D

COT StaffConsultant StaffSun Link

Michael Graham(COT)

KaneenCOT Public Relations


Manuel Tapia(AECOM)

Luis G. Gutierrez(Cushing St.) BridgeResident Engineer

Doaa Aboul-Hosn(SGI)

LS 1-4Resident Engineer

Joe Foster(DEIH)

Engineer Associate

Joe ChaseConstruction Manager

Mike Barton(HDR)

PMC Project Manager

JoAnn WilliamsGlenn Carter

Nathaniel MeddingsJeanette Frey

(HDR)Schedule Review/

Cost Control

Rich FoitikTina Goodacre

Sally SalicaConstruction

Administration

Project Support

John RuggSurvey Monitor

Art VillegasMSF Construction

Coordinator

Bruce WoodruffMSF Resident

Architect

Maria Ruedinger(GLHN)

ArchitectureConstruction Support

Greg Orsini(AECOM)

Traffic Control Inspector

Manuel Tapia(AECOM)

Assistant Resident Engineer

Mike Loo (HDR)

Deputy Construction Manager;Daniel Hinojos

Project Coordinator

Marwan Al-MukhtarSafety and Security Office

Daniel HinojosConstruction Safety

Compliance

Bobby Lall(Horrocks Engineers)

QA Auditor

Design SupportLS 1-4URSLTKKHA

StantecHDR Architecture

Design SupportMSF

GLHNURS

Design SupportLuis G. Gutierrez

(Cushing St.) BridgeAMEC

Structural GraceDavid Chase

(AECOM)QA/QC Manager

Materials Lab

Project Support


Sally SalicaConstruction

Administration

Michael Graham(COT)

KaneenCOT Public Relations



Schedule Review/Cost Control

(HDR)


Project Support


Sally SalicaConstruction Administration

Michael GrahamKaneen

COT Public Relations

Hollis Goldtooth(PSOMAS)

Admin Support


Santiago Lozano(COT) Civil Inspector

Daryl Cole – TDOT

Ricardo Pargas(HDR)

PMC Deputy Project Manager



(HDR)Schedule Review/Cost Control


Daryl Cole – TDOT



TUCSON MODERN STREETCARLS 1-4 & Systems Organization Chart

December 2013


L E G E N D

COT StaffPMC StaffADOT StaffSun Link Staff

Saretta TillmaandAdministrative

Support

Marwan Al-MukhtarSafety & Security

Officer

Daniel HinojosConstruction

Safety Compliance



Joe ChaseConstruction Manager


Mike BartonPMC Project Manager

Herman BernalADOT Safety & Security

Oversight Program Manager


Daryl Cole – TDOT



Tucson, Risk ManagementTucson, Police DepartmentTucson, Fire DepartmentRegional Transportation Authority, Transit DirectorRegional Transportation Authority, Mainstreet ProgramProject Consultants, Public Outreach

Safety & Security Review Committee

Transportation Security Administration, Surface Transportation InspectorProject Management ConsultantProject Consultants, EngineeringProject Management Oversight ConsultantsUniversity of Arizona, Parking and TransportationUniversity of Arizona, Risk ManagementSun Link, Safety and Security

Project Safety and Security OfficerState Safety Oversight Program RepresentativeTucson DOT, Project ManagementTucson DOT, MISTucson DOT, Traffic EngineeringTucson DOT, Safety OversightTucson DOT, Construction Safety Compliance

TUCSON MODERN STREETCARTechnical/Safety/Security

Organization ChartDecember 2013


Maintenance Manager

John KortekaasManager

Safety & Security

Marwan Al-MukhtarManager

Operations

Cleve Cleveland

AdministrationSaretta Tillmaand

AccountantDebra Carroll

General ManagerSun Link

Steve Bethel

Vehicle Maintenance

Technicians (3)ArrellinAsaro

Giarnieri

TPSS/OCS Technicians (1)

Marchant

ROWTechnicians (1)

Bethel

Cleaners

FieldSupervisors (2)

NegreteStockett

ControlSupervisors

Operators (2)Hall

Landry




TUCSON MODERN STREETCARSun Link Operations Organization Chart

December 2013


Abbreviations: A: Actual Date BL: Baseline COT: City of Tucson MS: Milestone NTP: Notice to Proceed December 2013 Quarterly Report

Status based on schedule data through November 2013 and field updates through December 2013

* Projected dates subject to change based on progress of work.

Critical interface points

Actual work later than baseline planProjected work later than baseline plan

Black text: Dates for NTP, SCBrown text: Dates for BL

Delivery Dates or Milestones

Status through December 2013

Lines, periods of non-work % Percent complete estimates based on assessment of schedules and progress observed in the field.

RAP: Rail Activation Plan SC: Substantial Completion Final

Jun Jul AugMar Apr May2011 2012

Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan FebJan Sep Oct Nov Dec2014

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec2013

Jun Jul AugMar Apr May2011 2012

Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan FebJan Sep Oct Nov Dec2014

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec2013

Punchlist or final testingBaseline Dates or Milestones

Open to traffic:8th St (MS2): 9/7/12 A4th Ave: 12/5/12 A

Sun Link Tucson Streetcar Schedule Overview

9/13/2013BL Vehicle Delivery

Complete

5/5/2014*Vehicle Delivery

Complete

Oregon Iron Works (OIW) – Streetcar Manufacturer

2 31 56 7

7/12/2011NTP

BBRI – Traction Power Substations 1/24/2013Delivery

Complete

4/30/2012NTP

D.L. Withers (DLW) – Maint. & Storage Facility 2/1/2013Baseline SC

5/15/2012Begin Work

Old Pueblo Trackworks (OPTW) – Civil & Systems3/20/2012

NTP

7/3/2013Baseline SC

Sun Link – System Integration Testing(a) MSF Tests (1 vehicle): 8/27/13 A – 12/9/13(b) System Integration Tests (1 vehicle): 8/27/13 A – 12/30/13(c) System Integration Tests (2 vehicles): 10/21/13 A – 12/31/13(d) System Integration Tests (all vehicles): 5/20/14 – 6/15/14(e) System Integration Drills: 5/20/14 – 5/28/14(RevSim) Pre-Revenue Simulation: 6/15/14 – 7/15/14

As-Built Schedule

All vehicle deliveries and subsequent testing sequences are considered critical. Vehicles #1 and #2, critical for system integration testing, were delivered on 8/30/13 and 10/16/13, respectively. Delivery of remaining vehicles (#3 - #8) is needed for final testing, Pre Revenue Service, and Revenue Operations.

10/23/2013BL Revenue Ops

Nortrak – Special Trackwork632WB: 4/12/12 A304EB: 6/6/12 A305EB(2): 8/24/12 A334EB: 10/19/12 A

7/7/2011NTP

Ashton – Luis Gutierrez Bridge (Cushing Street)6/20/2011

NTP

Bridge Deck Modifications

6/20/2012Baseline SC

5/17/2013Bridge Deck Mods

Complete

RevSim

12/19/2012BL Delivery

12/3/2012Award

8th

7/16/2014*Projected

Revenue Operations

632WB 304EB 305EB305EB/MANG: 10/20/12 A433EB: 10/26/12 A111EB: 11/15/12 A232EB: 11/19/12 A

334EB305EB

111EB232EB

433EB

11/15/2012BL & Actual

Delivery Complete

A1 S1A4

7/26/2012SC Awarded

MSF Switchgear: 9/12/12 ATPSS A3: 9/12/12 ATPSS A4: 10/17/12 ATPSS A1: 11/7/12 A

TPSS S1: 12/5/12 ATPSS A5: 12/19/12 ATPSS A2: 1/24/13 A M

A3A2A5

2 out of 8 vehicles delivered

6/4/2010NTP#1: 8/30/13 A

#2: 10/16/13 A #3: 1/30/14 #4: 1/10/14

#5: 4/16/14 #6: 3/10/14 #7: 4/4/14 #8: 5/5/14

Vehicle Arrival Dates:

10/21/2013SubstantialCompletion

7/16/2014*Projected

Revenue Operations

MS 3

5/19/2014*All Vehicle Acceptance

a d

Note: After vehicles are delivered additional time is required for COT vehicle acceptance (approximately 2 weeks per vehicle)

321

3/28/2013MSF Substantial

Completion

8/14/2013Final Substantial

Completion

Construction complete

6/19/2013*Field AcceptanceTesting Complete

Line Segments

2nd St: 3/13/13 ACongress: 5/20/13 A

Testing

Projected

100% Rail

Commissioning Segment 3 (MS3): 6/20/13 A100% Rail Placed: 7/25/13 ALine Segments #2-#4: 10/25/13 ALine Segment #1: 11/8/13 A 4th 2nd Congress

Percent Complete Projections:Rail Activation Documentation 100%

Work Remaining

Work Complete

Summary

c

8/26/2013Final

Punchlist

9/5/2013Certificate of Occupancy

12/6/2013Final Testing &

Punchlist

11/16/2013Final

Punchlist

10/21/2013Revised SC

b

84



Delivery complete

Delivery/testing complete

4 5 6 7

e

37%20% 51% 60% 78%


Activity ID Activity Name OrigDur

Start Finish

Critical Vehicle Critical Vehicle Delivery & TestingCritical Vehicle Delivery & TestingCritical Vehicle Delivery & TestingCritical Vehicle Delivery & TestingTMS-OIW-1380 Vehicle #1 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 30-Aug-13 A

TMS-OIW-1430 Vehicle #1 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 28 31-Aug-13 A 20-Dec-13

TMS-OIW-1390 Vehicle #2 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 16-Oct-13 A

TMS-OIW-1440 Vehicle #2 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 20 17-Oct-13 A 30-Dec-13

TMS-OIW-1410 Vehicle #4 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 10-Jan-14

TMS-OIW-1460 Vehicle #4 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 13-Jan-14 24-Jan-14


TMS-OIW-1450 Vehicle #3 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 31-Jan-14 13-Feb-14

TMS-OIW-1550 Vehicle #6 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 10-Mar-14

TMS-OIW-1580 Vehicle #6 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 11-Mar-14 24-Mar-14

TMS-OIW-1590 Vehicle #7 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 04-Apr-14

TMS-OIW-1620 Vehicle #7 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 07-Apr-14 18-Apr-14


TMS-OIW-1540 Vehicle #5 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 21-Apr-14 02-May-14

TMS-OIW-1630 Vehicle #8 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 05-May-14

TMS-OIW-1650 Vehicle #8 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 06-May-14 19-May-14

TMS-TEST-1500 #601 Drill - Derailment in the MSF - No Injuries 1 20-May-14 20-May-14

TMS-TEST-1260 Test #305 - Rail / Earth / Isolation / Detection - Entire Alig... 16 20-May-14 10-Jun-14

TMS-TEST-1510 #602 Drill - Collision of Streetcar and Automobile - Injuries 1 21-May-14 21-May-14

TMS-TEST-1520 #603 Drill - Hazardous Material Spill Adjacent to Station 1 22-May-14 22-May-14

TMS-TEST-1530 #604 Drill - Bomb Threat on a Streetcar 1 23-May-14 23-May-14

TMS-TEST-1540 #605 Drill - Person Hit by Streetcar - Accident or Suicide 1 26-May-14 26-May-14

TMS-TEST-1550 #606 Drill - Fire Adjacent to Right-of-Way 1 27-May-14 27-May-14

TMS-TEST-1560 #607 Drill - Derailment on the Alignment - Injuries 1 28-May-14 28-May-14

TMS-COT-3000 Preparation for Pre-Revenue Simulation 5 11-Jun-14 15-Jun-14

TMS-REVSIM Pre-Revenue Simulation 22 16-Jun-14 15-Jul-14

TMS-REVOPS Revenue Operations 0 16-Jul-14

ug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug2014

Vehicle #1 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track

Vehicle #1 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing






Vehicle #3 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Tes

Vehicle #6 - Arrival at Tucson Custom

Vehicle #6 - Tucson Track/Accepta

Vehicle #7 - Arrival at Tucson C

Vehicle #7 - Tucson Track/A

Vehicle #5 - Arrival at Tucson

Vehicle #5 - Tucson Trac

Vehicle #8 - Arrival at Tu

Vehicle #8 - Tucson T

#601 Drill - Derailmen

Test #305 - Rail

#602 Drill - Collision o

#603 Drill - Hazardou

#604 Drill - Bomb Th

#605 Drill - Person H

#606 Drill - Fire Adja

#607 Drill - Derailm

Preparation for

Pre-Rev

Revenue

Update: TMS Master Construction Schedule 2013-11for Dec 2013 Quarterly Meeting

Sun Link Tucson StreetcarCritical Vehicle Delivery, Acceptance, and Testing

TASK filter: TMS Critical Bars - Vehicles

TMS CriticalActual Work

Remaining WorkCritical Path

Milestone Page 1 of 1 Data Date: 01-Dec-13

Activity ID Activity Name OrigDur

Start Finish

Critical Vehicle Critical Vehicle Delivery & TestingCritical Vehicle Delivery & TestingCritical Vehicle Delivery & TestingCritical Vehicle Delivery & TestingTMS-OIW-1380 Vehicle #1 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 30-Aug-13 A

TMS-OIW-1430 Vehicle #1 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 28 31-Aug-13 A 20-Dec-13

TMS-OIW-1390 Vehicle #2 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 16-Oct-13 A

TMS-OIW-1440 Vehicle #2 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 20 17-Oct-13 A 30-Dec-13


TMS-OIW-1460 Vehicle #4 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 13-Jan-14 24-Jan-14


TMS-OIW-1450 Vehicle #3 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 31-Jan-14 13-Feb-14

TMS-OIW-1550 Vehicle #6 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 10-Mar-14

TMS-OIW-1580 Vehicle #6 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 11-Mar-14 24-Mar-14


TMS-OIW-1620 Vehicle #7 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 07-Apr-14 18-Apr-14


TMS-OIW-1540 Vehicle #5 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 21-Apr-14 02-May-14

TMS-OIW-1630 Vehicle #8 - Arrival at Tucson Customer Track 0 05-May-14

TMS-OIW-1650 Vehicle #8 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Testing 10 06-May-14 19-May-14

TMS-TEST-1500 #601 Drill - Derailment in the MSF - No Injuries 1 20-May-14 20-May-14

TMS-TEST-1260 Test #305 - Rail / Earth / Isolation / Detection - Entire Alig... 16 20-May-14 10-Jun-14

TMS-TEST-1510 #602 Drill - Collision of Streetcar and Automobile - Injuries 1 21-May-14 21-May-14

TMS-TEST-1520 #603 Drill - Hazardous Material Spill Adjacent to Station 1 22-May-14 22-May-14

TMS-TEST-1530 #604 Drill - Bomb Threat on a Streetcar 1 23-May-14 23-May-14

TMS-TEST-1540 #605 Drill - Person Hit by Streetcar - Accident or Suicide 1 26-May-14 26-May-14

TMS-TEST-1550 #606 Drill - Fire Adjacent to Right-of-Way 1 27-May-14 27-May-14

TMS-TEST-1560 #607 Drill - Derailment on the Alignment - Injuries 1 28-May-14 28-May-14

TMS-COT-3000 Preparation for Pre-Revenue Simulation 5 11-Jun-14 15-Jun-14

TMS-REVSIM Pre-Revenue Simulation 22 16-Jun-14 15-Jul-14

TMS-REVOPS Revenue Operations 0 16-Jul-14

ug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug2014








Vehicle #3 - Tucson Track/Acceptance Tes

Vehicle #6 - Arrival at Tucson Custom

Vehicle #6 - Tucson Track/Accepta

Vehicle #7 - Arrival at Tucson C

Vehicle #7 - Tucson Track/A

Vehicle #5 - Arrival at Tucson

Vehicle #5 - Tucson Trac

Vehicle #8 - Arrival at Tu

Vehicle #8 - Tucson T

#601 Drill - Derailmen

Test #305 - Rail

#602 Drill - Collision o

#603 Drill - Hazardou

#604 Drill - Bomb Th

#605 Drill - Person H

#606 Drill - Fire Adja

#607 Drill - Derailm

Preparation for

Pre-Rev

Revenue

Update: TMS Master Construction Schedule 2013-11for Dec 2013 Quarterly Meeting

Sun Link Tucson StreetcarCritical Vehicle Delivery, Acceptance, and Testing

TASK filter: TMS Critical Bars - Vehicles

TMS CriticalActual Work

Remaining WorkCritical Path

Milestone Page 1 of 1 Data Date: 01-Dec-13


Budget Chart Tucson StreetcarCash Flow Projection

Line Segment Construction

MSF Construction

OIW (From Pay Schedule) BBRI Nortrack

Remaining Contracts

Estimated Cash Flow Projection Contingency

Cumulative Cash Flow

ProjectionsFebruary-12 $89,058 $7,945,364 $29,786,545 $37,820,967 $37,820,967

March-12 $0 $100 $1,315,732 $1,315,832 $39,136,798April-12 $2,355,633 $0 $708,472 $3,064,105 $42,200,903May-12 $46,000 $110,908 $964,340 $1,121,249 $43,322,152

June-12 $5,922,867 $2,269,547 $236,346 $4,408,220 $12,836,981 $56,159,132July-12 $516,272 $0 $115,325 $631,597 $56,790,729

August-12 $5,799,905 $1,623,027 $0 $17,800 $2,270,220 $9,710,952 $66,501,681September-12 $3,681,618 $0 $333,735 $1,352,534 $5,367,888 $71,869,569

October-12 $2,984,421 $193,670 $0 $364,489 $154,700 $3,697,280 $75,566,849November-12 $4,028,680 $608,853 $1,621,106 $909,757 $119,799 $1,382,907 $8,671,102 $84,237,951December-12 $5,382,500 $796,863 $0 $422,387 $622,378 $1,525,320 $8,749,448 $92,987,399

January-13 $2,689,357 $1,082,322 $486,332 $0 $965,815 $5,223,826 $98,211,224February-13 $6,517,328 $926,773 $520,003 $0 $0 $397,167 $8,361,271 $106,572,496

March-13 $0 $1,105,670 $972,664 $0 $0 $1,643,866 $3,722,200 $110,294,695April-13 $6,487,658 $778,918 $0 $259,931 $0 $681,927 $8,208,434 $118,503,129May-13 $0 $512,374 $486,332 $0 $0 $1,766,626 $2,765,332 $121,268,462

June-13 $5,453,014 $157,513 $0 $714,809 $0 $1,726,535 $8,051,872 $129,320,333July-13 $2,479,895 $158,409 $2,796,408 $324,913 $0 $755,277 $6,514,902 $135,835,235

August-13 $0 $105,493 $0 $0 $0 $1,243,806 $1,349,299 $137,184,534September-13 $2,457,169 $74,051 $364,749 $0 $0 $845,233 $3,741,202 $140,925,736

October-13 $1,606,670 $0 $1,458,995 $0 $0 $1,384,839 $4,450,504 $145,376,240November-13 $1,100,000 $300,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $1,400,000 $3,050,000 $148,426,240December-13 $2,500,000 $350,000 $2,354,971 $250,000 $0 $1,400,000 $6,854,971 $155,281,211

January-14 $2,500,000 $293,309 $2,107,437 $250,000 $0 $1,300,000 $6,450,746 $161,731,957February-14 $2,500,000 $2,755,879 $200,000 $0 $1,200,000 $6,655,879 $255,479 $168,387,836

March-14 $1,500,000 $2,406,721 $28,975 $0 $800,000 $4,735,696 $4,735,696 $173,123,532April-14 $623,969 $1,931,614 $0 $800,000 $3,355,583 $3,355,583 $176,479,115May-14 $1,013,191 $0 $700,000 $1,713,191 $1,713,191 $178,192,306

June-14 $346,669 $0 $700,000 $1,046,669 $1,046,669 $179,238,975July-14 $1,673,525 $0 $682,575 $2,356,100 $2,356,100 $181,595,075

$0 $14,935,925 $196,531,000Total: $69,222,015 $9,067,245 $33,511,607 $3,610,773 $1,805,455 $64,377,980 $181,595,075.00 $196,531,000

Notes: 1) Feb 2012 row includes cumulative costs through Feb 2012 and costs incurred in advance of preliminary engineering2) Highlighted costs are actual expenditures as of October Financial Closing.3) Remaining costs shown are estimated projections for each contract.4) Cash flow projection totals exclude costs in advance of preliminary engineering.

Construction, Design, Vehicles, Startup

Page 1 of 1 Report Date: 10/2013

Tucson StreetcarCash Flow Projection

Line Segment Construction

MSF Construction

OIW (From Pay Schedule) BBRI Nortrack

Remaining Contracts

Estimated Cash Flow Projection Contingency

Cumulative Cash Flow

ProjectionsFebruary-12 $89,058 $7,945,364 $29,786,545 $37,820,967 $37,820,967

March-12 $0 $100 $1,315,732 $1,315,832 $39,136,798April-12 $2,355,633 $0 $708,472 $3,064,105 $42,200,903May-12 $46,000 $110,908 $964,340 $1,121,249 $43,322,152

June-12 $5,922,867 $2,269,547 $236,346 $4,408,220 $12,836,981 $56,159,132July-12 $516,272 $0 $115,325 $631,597 $56,790,729

August-12 $5,799,905 $1,623,027 $0 $17,800 $2,270,220 $9,710,952 $66,501,681September-12 $3,681,618 $0 $333,735 $1,352,534 $5,367,888 $71,869,569

October-12 $2,984,421 $193,670 $0 $364,489 $154,700 $3,697,280 $75,566,849November-12 $4,028,680 $608,853 $1,621,106 $909,757 $119,799 $1,382,907 $8,671,102 $84,237,951December-12 $5,382,500 $796,863 $0 $422,387 $622,378 $1,525,320 $8,749,448 $92,987,399

January-13 $2,689,357 $1,082,322 $486,332 $0 $965,815 $5,223,826 $98,211,224February-13 $6,517,328 $926,773 $520,003 $0 $0 $397,167 $8,361,271 $106,572,496

March-13 $0 $1,105,670 $972,664 $0 $0 $1,643,866 $3,722,200 $110,294,695April-13 $6,487,658 $778,918 $0 $259,931 $0 $681,927 $8,208,434 $118,503,129May-13 $0 $512,374 $486,332 $0 $0 $1,766,626 $2,765,332 $121,268,462

June-13 $5,453,014 $157,513 $0 $714,809 $0 $1,726,535 $8,051,872 $129,320,333July-13 $2,479,895 $158,409 $2,796,408 $324,913 $0 $755,277 $6,514,902 $135,835,235

August-13 $0 $105,493 $0 $0 $0 $1,243,806 $1,349,299 $137,184,534September-13 $2,457,169 $74,051 $364,749 $0 $0 $845,233 $3,741,202 $140,925,736

October-13 $1,606,670 $0 $1,458,995 $0 $0 $1,384,839 $4,450,504 $145,376,240November-13 $1,100,000 $300,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $1,400,000 $3,050,000 $148,426,240December-13 $2,500,000 $350,000 $2,354,971 $250,000 $0 $1,400,000 $6,854,971 $155,281,211

January-14 $2,500,000 $293,309 $2,107,437 $250,000 $0 $1,300,000 $6,450,746 $161,731,957February-14 $2,500,000 $2,755,879 $200,000 $0 $1,200,000 $6,655,879 $255,479 $168,387,836

March-14 $1,500,000 $2,406,721 $28,975 $0 $800,000 $4,735,696 $4,735,696 $173,123,532April-14 $623,969 $1,931,614 $0 $800,000 $3,355,583 $3,355,583 $176,479,115May-14 $1,013,191 $0 $700,000 $1,713,191 $1,713,191 $178,192,306

June-14 $346,669 $0 $700,000 $1,046,669 $1,046,669 $179,238,975July-14 $1,673,525 $0 $682,575 $2,356,100 $2,356,100 $181,595,075

$0 $14,935,925 $196,531,000Total: $69,222,015 $9,067,245 $33,511,607 $3,610,773 $1,805,455 $64,377,980 $181,595,075.00 $196,531,000

Notes: 1) Feb 2012 row includes cumulative costs through Feb 2012 and costs incurred in advance of preliminary engineering2) Highlighted costs are actual expenditures as of October Financial Closing.3) Remaining costs shown are estimated projections for each contract.4) Cash flow projection totals exclude costs in advance of preliminary engineering.

Construction, Design, Vehicles, Startup



Tucson StreetcarCash Flow Projection by Standard Cost Category

Current Actual $(CTD) (as of

1/31/13) February-2013 March-2013 April-2013 May-2013 June-2013 July-2013 August-2013 September-2013$10,311,844 $1,700,694 $0 $1,692,951 $0 $1,422,962 $647,127 $0 $641,197

$243,393 $410,846 $0 $408,976 $0 $343,753 $156,330 $0 $154,898

$4,852,916 $1,813,587 $1,105,670 $1,661,694 $512,374 $899,505 $495,848 $105,493 $408,398

$28,067,358 $1,780,295 $0 $1,772,191 $0 $1,489,564 $677,416 $0 $671,209

$7,185,769 $1,738,679 $0 $1,990,695 $0 $2,169,553 $986,495 $0 $655,519Construction Subtotal (10 - 50): $50,661,280 $7,444,101 $1,105,670 $7,526,507 $512,374 $6,325,336 $2,963,217 $105,493 $2,531,221

$150,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$15,185,909 $569,108 $1,175,910 $84,313 $704,756 $213,467 $2,889,790 $153,783 $469,253

$32,460,570 $348,062 $1,440,620 $597,614 $1,548,203 $1,513,068 $661,895 $1,090,023 $740,729Subtotal (10 - 80): $98,211,224 $8,361,271 $3,722,200 $8,208,434 $2,765,332 $8,051,872 $6,514,902 $1,349,299 $3,741,202

90.00 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Total Cash Flow Projection: $98,211,224 $106,572,495 $110,294,695 $118,503,129 $121,268,461 $129,320,333 $135,835,234 $137,184,533 $140,925,736

40 SITEWORK & SPECIAL CONDITIONS

50 SYSTEMS

60 ROW, LAND, EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS

70 VEHICLES

80 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

STANDARD COST CATEGORY10 GUIDEWAY & TRACK ELEMENTS

30 SUPPORT FACILITIES: YARDS, SHOPS, ADMIN. BLDGS

20 STATIONS, STOPS, TERMINALS, INTERMODAL



Current Actual $(CTD) (as of

1/31/13) February-2013 March-2013 April-2013 May-2013 June-2013 July-2013 August-2013 September-2013$10,311,844 $1,700,694 $0 $1,692,951 $0 $1,422,962 $647,127 $0 $641,197

$243,393 $410,846 $0 $408,976 $0 $343,753 $156,330 $0 $154,898

$4,852,916 $1,813,587 $1,105,670 $1,661,694 $512,374 $899,505 $495,848 $105,493 $408,398

$28,067,358 $1,780,295 $0 $1,772,191 $0 $1,489,564 $677,416 $0 $671,209

$7,185,769 $1,738,679 $0 $1,990,695 $0 $2,169,553 $986,495 $0 $655,519Construction Subtotal (10 - 50): $50,661,280 $7,444,101 $1,105,670 $7,526,507 $512,374 $6,325,336 $2,963,217 $105,493 $2,531,221

$150,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$15,185,909 $569,108 $1,175,910 $84,313 $704,756 $213,467 $2,889,790 $153,783 $469,253

$32,460,570 $348,062 $1,440,620 $597,614 $1,548,203 $1,513,068 $661,895 $1,090,023 $740,729Subtotal (10 - 80): $98,211,224 $8,361,271 $3,722,200 $8,208,434 $2,765,332 $8,051,872 $6,514,902 $1,349,299 $3,741,202

90.00 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Total Cash Flow Projection: $98,211,224 $106,572,495 $110,294,695 $118,503,129 $121,268,461 $129,320,333 $135,835,234 $137,184,533 $140,925,736


50 SYSTEMS


70 VEHICLES








Construction Subtotal (10 - 50):

Subtotal (10 - 80):90.00 Contingency

Total Cash Flow Projection:


50 SYSTEMS


70 VEHICLES





October-2013 November-2013 December-2013 January-2014 February-2014 March-2014 April-2014 May-2014 June-2014 July-2014Total Per SCC

Code$419,260 $287,045 $652,374 $652,374 $652,374 $391,424 $162,824 $0 $0 $0 $19,634,450

$101,283 $69,343 $157,598 $157,598 $157,598 $94,559 $39,334 $0 $0 $0 $2,495,508

$218,620 $449,677 $690,175 $633,484 $340,175 $204,105 $84,903 $0 $0 $0 $14,476,626

$438,883 $300,480 $682,908 $682,908 $682,908 $409,745 $170,445 $0 $0 $0 $37,826,311

$428,624 $543,456 $916,945 $916,945 $866,945 $429,142 $166,461 $0 $0 $0 $18,995,228$1,606,670 $1,650,000 $3,100,000 $3,043,309 $2,700,000 $1,528,975 $623,969 $0 $0 $0 $93,428,123

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,200

$1,630,215 $173,094 $2,528,065 $2,268,167 $2,904,246 $2,505,632 $2,030,525 $1,099,738 $433,216 $1,757,918 $38,777,103

$1,213,619 $1,226,906 $1,226,906 $1,139,270 $1,051,633 $701,089 $701,089 $613,453 $613,453 $598,182 $49,486,384$4,450,504 $3,050,000 $6,854,971 $6,450,746 $6,655,879 $4,735,696 $3,355,583 $1,713,191 $1,046,669 $2,356,100 $181,595,075

$0 $0 $0 $0 $255,479 $4,735,696 $3,355,583 $1,713,191 $1,046,669 $2,356,100 $14,935,925$145,376,239 $148,426,239 $155,281,210 $161,731,956 $168,387,835 $173,123,531 $176,479,114 $178,192,305 $179,238,974 $181,595,074 $196,531,000



Construction Subtotal (10 - 50):

Subtotal (10 - 80):90.00 Contingency

Total Cash Flow Projection:


50 SYSTEMS


70 VEHICLES





October-2013 November-2013 December-2013 January-2014 February-2014 March-2014 April-2014 May-2014 June-2014 July-2014Total Per SCC

Code$419,260 $287,045 $652,374 $652,374 $652,374 $391,424 $162,824 $0 $0 $0 $19,634,450

$101,283 $69,343 $157,598 $157,598 $157,598 $94,559 $39,334 $0 $0 $0 $2,495,508

$218,620 $449,677 $690,175 $633,484 $340,175 $204,105 $84,903 $0 $0 $0 $14,476,626

$438,883 $300,480 $682,908 $682,908 $682,908 $409,745 $170,445 $0 $0 $0 $37,826,311

$428,624 $543,456 $916,945 $916,945 $866,945 $429,142 $166,461 $0 $0 $0 $18,995,228$1,606,670 $1,650,000 $3,100,000 $3,043,309 $2,700,000 $1,528,975 $623,969 $0 $0 $0 $93,428,123

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,200

$1,630,215 $173,094 $2,528,065 $2,268,167 $2,904,246 $2,505,632 $2,030,525 $1,099,738 $433,216 $1,757,918 $38,777,103

$1,213,619 $1,226,906 $1,226,906 $1,139,270 $1,051,633 $701,089 $701,089 $613,453 $613,453 $598,182 $49,486,384$4,450,504 $3,050,000 $6,854,971 $6,450,746 $6,655,879 $4,735,696 $3,355,583 $1,713,191 $1,046,669 $2,356,100 $181,595,075

$0 $0 $0 $0 $255,479 $4,735,696 $3,355,583 $1,713,191 $1,046,669 $2,356,100 $14,935,925$145,376,239 $148,426,239 $155,281,210 $161,731,956 $168,387,835 $173,123,531 $176,479,114 $178,192,305 $179,238,974 $181,595,074 $196,531,000


46FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

5 Year Transit Plan

47FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

48FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

49FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

50FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

51FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

52FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

53FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

54FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

55FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013

56FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013


MR Submittal Schedule 20131205

Updated 12-5-13SUBMITTAL MATRIXAssumptions: Pre-Revenue Service Begins - 6-1-2014Assumptions: Revenue Service Begins - 7-1-2014 Dates in RED have been submitted.

ELEMENT DOC IDRESPONSIBILITY

SUN LINK, UNLESS OTHERWISE

Individual Responsibilit

yDESCRIPTION TASK

Draft DueSubmittal to

PMOCRAP RAP Rail Activation PlanRAP Cleve Develop Rail Activation Plan 4/15/2013RAP 3.2 TrainingTRAINING Cleve Operator Rule Book Training 7/31/2013 9/17/2013TRAINING Marwan Track Access Training / Employee 8/12/2013 9/6/2013MANUAL Marwan Emergency Responder Manual (107 SOPs) 8/12/2013 10/17/2013RAP 3.3 Operations Planning / Approach / PhilosophyPLAN 3.6.3 Cleve SITP Volume I: Project Management 7/3/2013 8/27/2013PLAN 3.6.3 Cleve SITP Volume II: Procedures 7/15/2013 8/22/2013PLAN 3.6.3 Cleve SITP Volume III: Schedule and Drills 11/15/2013 12/13/2013SOP's SOP's Section 107 - Emergency Operating SituationsSOP 107.01 Marwan Handling Disasters and Emergency Occurrences 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.02 Marwan Medical Emergency Injured or Ill Passenger(s) on Sun Link Property 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.03 Marwan Coordination with Emergency Response Agencies 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.04 Marwan Emergency Evacuation 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.05 Marwan Emergency Response Vehicles at Grade Crossing 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.06 Marwan Fatality 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.07 Marwan Accident Investigations 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.08 Marwan Firearms Onboard a Train, Station or on Sun Link Property 8/12/2013 10/17/2013SOP 107.09 Marwan Bomb Threat Aboard a Train or in a Station 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.10 Marwan Fire or Smoke (LRV / ROW) 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.11 Marwan Hijacking or Hostage Situation Aboard a Train 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.12 Marwan Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) S 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.13 Marwan Operations & Maintenance Facility Fire Alarm 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.14 Marwan HAZMAT Spill Response / O&M Facility 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.15 Marwan Civil Disturbance Procedure 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.16 Marwan Derailment 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.17 Marwan Severe Weather – Special Response Procedure 8/12/2013 8/30/2013RAP 3.5 Safety and SecurityRAP 3.5.1 Marwan Develop Safety Certification Program (SSCP) 9/26/2013RAP 3.5.2 Marwan Safety Certification Program Schedule 11/1/2013 12/5/2013RAP 3.5.3 Marwan Develop Operational /System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) 11/15/2013 12/4/2013 to ADOTRAP 3.5.5 Marwan Develop and Manage Fire/Life Safety & Security Program 11/30/2013 1/4/2014RAP 3.5.6 Marwan Develop Occupational Health and Safety (AWAIR) 3/19/2014 4/30/2014RAP 3.5.7 Marwan Develop Accident Investigation SOP 107.07 8/12/2013 8/30/2013RAP 3.5.8 Marwan Develop Accident Reporting (FTA, OSHA, SSO, NTSB) SOP 101.05 8/12/2013 8/30/2013RAP 3.5.9 Marwan Develop Accident Investigation Procedures and Forms 11/30/2013 1/10/2014RAP 3.5.10 Marwan Develop Hazard Tracking and Management Procedure 11/27/2013 12/31/2013RAP 3.5.12 Marwan Develop Security Program Plan (SSEPP) 11/27/2013 12/31/2013PLAN Marwan Safety and Security Certification Plan (SSCP) 8/22/2013PLAN Marwan Safety and Security Management Plan (SSMP) 8/22/2013POLICY Cleve/Shellie Fare Collection Policy and Procedures 5/19/2014 6/30/2014PLAN RFMP Cleve/John Rail Fleet Management Plan 12/31/2014 2/11/2014PLAN OMP Cleve/John Operations & Maintenance Plan 1/31/2014 3/14/2014

Revenue Service Begins7/1/2014

Page 1 of 1

Updated 12-5-13SUBMITTAL MATRIXAssumptions: Pre-Revenue Service Begins - 6-1-2014Assumptions: Revenue Service Begins - 7-1-2014 Dates in RED have been submitted.

ELEMENT DOC IDRESPONSIBILITY

SUN LINK, UNLESS OTHERWISE

Individual Responsibilit

yDESCRIPTION TASK

Draft DueSubmittal to

PMOCRAP RAP Rail Activation PlanRAP Cleve Develop Rail Activation Plan 4/15/2013RAP 3.2 TrainingTRAINING Cleve Operator Rule Book Training 7/31/2013 9/17/2013TRAINING Marwan Track Access Training / Employee 8/12/2013 9/6/2013MANUAL Marwan Emergency Responder Manual (107 SOPs) 8/12/2013 10/17/2013RAP 3.3 Operations Planning / Approach / PhilosophyPLAN 3.6.3 Cleve SITP Volume I: Project Management 7/3/2013 8/27/2013PLAN 3.6.3 Cleve SITP Volume II: Procedures 7/15/2013 8/22/2013PLAN 3.6.3 Cleve SITP Volume III: Schedule and Drills 11/15/2013 12/13/2013SOP's SOP's Section 107 - Emergency Operating SituationsSOP 107.01 Marwan Handling Disasters and Emergency Occurrences 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.02 Marwan Medical Emergency Injured or Ill Passenger(s) on Sun Link Property 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.03 Marwan Coordination with Emergency Response Agencies 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.04 Marwan Emergency Evacuation 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.05 Marwan Emergency Response Vehicles at Grade Crossing 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.06 Marwan Fatality 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.07 Marwan Accident Investigations 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.08 Marwan Firearms Onboard a Train, Station or on Sun Link Property 8/12/2013 10/17/2013SOP 107.09 Marwan Bomb Threat Aboard a Train or in a Station 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.10 Marwan Fire or Smoke (LRV / ROW) 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.11 Marwan Hijacking or Hostage Situation Aboard a Train 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.12 Marwan Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) S 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.13 Marwan Operations & Maintenance Facility Fire Alarm 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.14 Marwan HAZMAT Spill Response / O&M Facility 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.15 Marwan Civil Disturbance Procedure 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.16 Marwan Derailment 8/12/2013 8/30/2013SOP 107.17 Marwan Severe Weather – Special Response Procedure 8/12/2013 8/30/2013RAP 3.5 Safety and SecurityRAP 3.5.1 Marwan Develop Safety Certification Program (SSCP) 9/26/2013RAP 3.5.2 Marwan Safety Certification Program Schedule 11/1/2013 12/5/2013RAP 3.5.3 Marwan Develop Operational /System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) 11/15/2013 12/4/2013 to ADOTRAP 3.5.5 Marwan Develop and Manage Fire/Life Safety & Security Program 11/30/2013 1/4/2014RAP 3.5.6 Marwan Develop Occupational Health and Safety (AWAIR) 3/19/2014 4/30/2014RAP 3.5.7 Marwan Develop Accident Investigation SOP 107.07 8/12/2013 8/30/2013RAP 3.5.8 Marwan Develop Accident Reporting (FTA, OSHA, SSO, NTSB) SOP 101.05 8/12/2013 8/30/2013RAP 3.5.9 Marwan Develop Accident Investigation Procedures and Forms 11/30/2013 1/10/2014RAP 3.5.10 Marwan Develop Hazard Tracking and Management Procedure 11/27/2013 12/31/2013RAP 3.5.12 Marwan Develop Security Program Plan (SSEPP) 11/27/2013 12/31/2013PLAN Marwan Safety and Security Certification Plan (SSCP) 8/22/2013PLAN Marwan Safety and Security Management Plan (SSMP) 8/22/2013POLICY Cleve/Shellie Fare Collection Policy and Procedures 5/19/2014 6/30/2014PLAN RFMP Cleve/John Rail Fleet Management Plan 12/31/2014 2/11/2014PLAN OMP Cleve/John Operations & Maintenance Plan 1/31/2014 3/14/2014

Revenue Service Begins7/1/2014

Page 1 of 1


2012 National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries

For release 10:00 a.m. (EDT) Thursday, August 22, 2013 USDL-13-1699 Technical information: (202) 691-6170 • [email protected] • www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm Media contact: (202) 691-5902 • [email protected]

NATIONAL CENSUS OF FATAL OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES IN 2012(PRELIMINARY RESULTS)

A preliminary total of 4,383 fatal work injuries were recorded in the United States in 2012, down from a revised count of 4,693 fatal work injuries in 2011, according to results from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The 2012 total represents the second lowest preliminary total since CFOI was first conducted in 1992. The rate of fatal work injury for U.S. workers in 2012 was 3.2 per 100,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers, down from a rate of 3.5 per 100,000 in 2011.

Over the last 5 years, net increases to the preliminary count have ranged from 84 in 2011 to 211 in 2009.The revised 2011 figure represented a 2 percent increase over the preliminary total, while the 2009 figure was a 5 percent increase. Revised 2012 data from CFOI will be released in the late Springof 2014.

Key preliminary findings of the 2012 Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries:

• Fatal work injuries in the private construction sector increased 5 percent to 775 in 2012 from 738 in 2011. Total hours worked in the private construction industry increased one percent in 2012. The increase in fatal occupational injuries in 2012 follows five consecutive years of declining fatal injury counts in the construction sector. Fatal construction injuries are down 37 percent since 2006.

• Since 2011, CFOI has identified whether fatally-injured workers were working as contractors at the time of the fatal incident. In 2012, 708 decedents were identified as contractors, many of whom worked in construction and transportation occupations.

• Fatal work injuries declined among non-Hispanic white workers (down 10 percent) and Hispanic or Latino workers (down 5 percent) in 2012. Fatal work injuries were higher among non-Hispanic black or African-American workers and non-Hispanic Asian workers.

• Fatal work injuries involving workers under 16 years of age nearly doubled, rising from 10 in 2011 to 19 in 2012—the highest total since 2005. Fatal work injuries in the other age groups declined in 2012. Fatal work injuries among workers 55 years of age and older declined for the second straight year.

• Work-related suicides declined 10 percent from 2011 totals, but violence accounted for about 17 percent of all fatal work injuries in 2012.

• Fatal work injuries in the private mining sector rose in 2012, led by an increase in fatal injuries to workers in oil and gas extraction industries. Fatal work injuries in oil and gas extraction industries rose 23 percent to 138 in 2012, reaching a new high for the series.


2

Worker characteristics

The number of fatal work injuries involving non-Hispanic white workers declined 10 percent in 2012, but rose by 13 percent for non-Hispanic Asian workers. Despite the increase, Asian workers stillrecorded a lower rate of fatal injury than the rate for workers overall (1.8 per 100,000 FTE workers for non-Hispanic Asians versus 3.2 per 100,000 FTE workers for workers overall).

Fatal work injuries among Hispanic or Latino workers dropped to 708 in 2012 from 749 in 2011, a decrease of 5 percent. Of the 708 fatal work injuries incurred by Hispanic or Latino workers, 454 (or 64 percent) involved foreign-born workers. Overall, there were 777 fatal work injuries involving foreign-born workers in 2012, of which the greatest share (299 or 38 percent) were born in Mexico.

Fatal work injuries increased for workers under 16 years of age, rising to 19 in 2012 from 10 in 2011, reaching its highest level since 2005. Fourteen of these young decedents were employed as agricultural workers. Fatal work injuries involving men fell from 4,308 in 2011 to 4,045 in 2012—the lowest total since the inception of the fatality census in 1992.

Fatal injuries to both wage and salary workers and self-employed workers declined in 2012.

For more detailed information on fatal injuries by worker characteristics, see the 2012 tables at www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.

Type of incident

Transportation incidents accounted for more than 2 out of every 5 fatal work injuries in 2012. (See chart 1.) Of the 1,789 transportation-related fatal injuries, about 58 percent (1,044 cases) were roadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles. Nonroadway incidents, such as a tractor overturn in a farm field, accounted for another 13 percent of the transportation-related fatal injuries. About 16 percent of fatal transportation incidents in 2012 involved pedestrians who were struck by vehicles. Of the 283 fatal work injuries involving pedestrians struck by vehicles, 65 occurred in work zones. (Note that transportation counts presented in this release are expected to rise when updated 2012 data are released in Spring 2014 because key source documentation detailing specific transportation-related incidents has not yet been received.)

Fatal work injuries among those fatally injured in aircraft incidents in 2012 declined by 14 percent from 2011, accounting for 125 fatalities or about 7 percent of the transportation total.

Overall, 767 workers were killed as a result of violence and other injuries by persons or animals, including 463 homicides and 225 suicides. The work-related suicide total for 2012 declined 10 percent from the 2011 total and the homicide total was also slightly lower. Shootings were the most frequent manner of death in both homicides (81 percent) and suicides (48 percent). Of the 338 fatal work injuries involving female workers, 29 percent involved homicides.

Fatal falls, slips, or trips took the lives of 668 workers in 2012, down slightly from 2011. Falls to a lower level accounted for 544 or about 81 percent of those fatalities. In 2012, the height of the fall was reported in 437 of the fatal falls to a lower level. Of those cases, about one in four occurred after a fall of 10 feet or less. Another one-fourth of the fatal fall cases occurred from falls of over 30 feet.


3

While the total number of fatal work injuries involving contact with objects and equipment in 2012 remained about the same as in 2011, the number of workers fatally injured after being struck by objects or equipment increased by 7 percent (to 509 fatal work injuries in 2012 from 476 in 2011). This total includes 233 workers struck by falling objects or equipment and 199 struck by powered vehicles or mobile equipment not in normal operation.

Chart 1. Fatal occupational injuries, by major event, 2012*

Total = 4,383

SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, 2013.Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.NOTE: Reference year 2011 constitutes a series break from earlier years for event data. For more information, see http://www.bls.gov/iif/osh_notice11.htm.*Data for 2012 are preliminary.

Transportation incidents41%Roadway incidents

24%

Homicides11%

Struck by object or equipment

12%

Falls, slips, trips

15%

Falls to lower level12%

7%

Fires and explosions 3%

Violence and other injuries by persons or animals 17%

Contact with objectsand equipment 16%

Exposure to harmful substances or environments

Other transportationincidents17%

There were 142 multiple-fatality incidents in 2012 (incidents in which more than one worker was killed) in which 341 workers died.

For more detailed information on fatal injuries by incident, see the 2012 tables at www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.

Industry

In the private sector, there were 3,945 fatal work injuries in 2012, down 6 percent to a new series low. Both goods-producing industries and service-providing industries showed declines.

Among goods-producing sectors, the number of fatal work injuries in the private construction sector increased 5 percent in 2012. Total hours worked were higher by one percent in 2012. The increase in 2012 was the first in construction fatalities since 2006. Construction fatalities are down 37 percent over that time. Construction accounted for the highest number of fatal work injuries of any industry sector in 2012. (See chart 2.)

Fatal work injuries in the private mining sector increased 14 percent to 177 in 2012 from 155 in 2011—the highest level since 2007. The number of fatal work injury cases in oil and gas extraction industries rose to 138 in 2012 from 112 in 2011; the 2012 figure represents a series high. Fatal work injuries in coal mining increased slightly, and fatal work injuries in support activities for mining increased 9 percent. CFOI has used the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) to define industry since 2003, and data on oil and gas extraction industries in CFOI comprise NAICS 21111 Oil


4

and gas extraction, NAICS 213111 Drilling oil and gas wells, and NAICS 213112 Support activities for oil and gas operations.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting fatalities decreased 16 percent to 475 in 2012 from 566 in 2011. This follows a 9 percent drop in agriculture fatalities in 2011. Fatal injuries in the crop production, animal production, forestry and logging, and fishing sectors were all lower in 2012. Despite the declines in fatal work injuries in this sector over the last two years, agriculture recorded the highest fatal injury rate of any industry sector at 21.2 fatal injuries per 100,000 FTE workers in 2012.

*Data for 2012 are preliminary. NOTE: All industries shown are private with the exception of government, which includes fatal injuries to workers employed by governmental organizations regardless of industry. Fatal injury rates exclude workers under the age of 16 years, volunteers, and resident military. The number of fatal work injuries represents total published fatal injuries before the exclusions. For additional information on the fatal work injury rate methodology, please see http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshnotice10.htm.SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, 2013.

Chart 2. Number and rate of fatal occupational injuries, by industry sector, 2012*

Total fatal work injuries = 4,383

All-worker fatal injury rate = 3.2

10 20200400Fatal work injury rate

(per 100,000 full-time equivalent workers)Number of fatal work injuries

Utilities

Information

Financial activities

Educational and health services

Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction

Other services (exc. public admin.)Wholesale trade

Leisure and hospitality

Retail trade

Manufacturing

Professional and business services

Government

Agriculture, forestry, fishingand hunting

Transportation and warehousing

Construction

600 0 30

0.7

0.9

1.4

1.9

2.0

2.1

2.1

2.5

2.5

2.6

5.0

9.5

13.3

15.6

21.2

677

475

438

388

314

262

220

191

183

177

139

81

38

22

775

800

Among service-providing industries in the private sector, fatal work injuries in transportation and warehousing accounted for 677 fatal work injuries in 2012, a decrease of 10 percent over the revised2011 count (749 fatalities). The number of fatal injuries in truck transportation, the largest subsector within transportation and warehousing in terms of employment, decreased 6 percent in 2012. (As noted, transportation counts presented in this release are expected to rise when updated 2012 data are releasedin Spring 2014.) Among other transportation subsectors, fatal work injuries in air transportation were slightly higher, but fatalities in water and rail transportation were lower in 2012.

Fatal work injuries in the financial activities sector declined 17 percent in 2012 to 81. The professional and business services sector also reported lower numbers of fatal injuries in 2012, down 10 percent from 2011.

Fatal occupational injuries among government workers decreased 13 percent from 2011 to 438 fatal work injuries, the lowest fatal work injury total since the start of the fatality census. Both state government and local government showed declines (19 percent and 16 percent, respectively), though fatal injuries among federal government workers remained about the same.

For more detailed information on fatal injuries by industry, see the 2012 tables at www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.


5

Occupation

Fatal work injuries in construction and extraction occupations rose for the second year in a row to 838—a 5 percent increase from 2011. Hours worked increased one percent in this occupation group during that period. Fatal injuries among construction trades workers rose in 2012 to 577 after 5 years of decline. This marked an 8 percent increase over the series low of 533 in 2011, but a 41 percent drop from the high of 977 reported in 2006. Fatal work injuries to construction laborers, the subgroup in this category with the highest number of fatalities, increased 10 percent to 210 in 2012, following a series low of 191 in 2011. Fatal injuries to roofers, another subgroup within construction trades workers, rose to 70 in 2012, a 17 percent rise from 2011 marking the highest count in 5 years.

Chart 3. Occupations with high fatal work injury rates, 2012*

*Data for 2012 are preliminary.NOTE: Fatal injury rates exclude workers under the age of 16 years, volunteers, and resident military. The number of fatal work injuries represents total published fatal injuries before the exclusions. For additional information on the fatal work injury rate methodology, please see http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshnotice10.htm.SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, 2013.

Fatal work injury rate(per 100,000 full-time equivalent workers)

50100 400200

Number of fatal work injuries

Construction laborers

Farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural managers

Driver/sales workers and truck drivers

Electrical power-line installersand repairers

Refuse and recyclable material collectors

Structural iron and steel workers

Roofers

Aircraft pilots and flight engineers

Fishers and related fishing workers

Logging workers

150 0 800

127.8

117.0

53.4

40.5

37.0

27.1

23.0

22.1

21.3

17.4

22

26

26

32

62

70

71

210

216

741

600

Total fatal work injuries = 4,383

All-worker fatal injury rate = 3.2

Fatal work injuries in transportation and material moving occupations were down 7 percent to 1,150 in 2012. Fatal work injuries in this occupational group accounted for about one quarter of all fatal occupational injuries. Drivers/sales workers and truck drivers was the subgroup within transportation and material moving occupations with the highest number of fatal injuries. Dropping 4 percent, this subgroup recorded 741 fatalities in 2012. Fatal injuries to taxi drivers and chauffeurs were down 28 percent to a series low of 46. (As noted, transportation and material moving counts presented in this release are expected to rise when updated 2012 data are released in Spring 2014.)

The number of fatal work injuries among protective service occupations decreased 21 percent in 2012 to 224 fatalities–reaching the lowest count since the occupational series began in 2003. The decline was led by lower numbers of fatal injuries to police and sheriff’s patrol officers, which dropped 20 percent to 104 in 2012 to continue a two-year downward trend. Fatal injuries to both security guards and firefighters reached series lows with 48 and 17 fatalities, respectively.

Fatal work injuries to workers in management occupations declined 8 percent to 429 in 2012—the lowest level in the series. This decrease was driven primarily by the 19 percent decline in fatal injuries to farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural managers from 268 in 2011 to 216 in 2012.


6

Fatalities among farming, fishing, and forestry occupations declined 6 percent to 245 in 2012. This was led by the 24 percent drop in fatalities to fishers and related fishing workers from 42 in 2011 to a series low of 32 in 2012. Fatal injuries to logging workers have remained somewhat level for the last three years, decreasing slightly to 62 in 2012.

Fatal injuries to resident military personnel reached a series low in 2012, dropping 25 percent from 57 fatalities in 2011 to 43.

For more detailed information on fatal injuries by occupation, see the 2012 tables at www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.

Contract workers

In addition to identifying the industry in which a decedent was employed, CFOI began in 2011 to identify whether a worker was a contractor. A contractor is defined as a worker employed by one firm but working at the behest of another firm that exercises overall responsibility for the operations at the site where the decedent was fatally injured. This information helps to identify the location and type of work being performed when the fatal work injury occurred.

In 2012, the number of fatal occupational injuries incurred by contractors was 708, or 16 percent of all fatal injuries, compared to 542 reported in 2011. Falls to a lower level accounted for 30 percent of contractor deaths while struck by object or equipment (18 percent) and pedestrian vehicular (11 percent) incidents also were frequent events among contractors.

Fatally-injured contractors were most often contracted by a government entity (151 or 21 percent of all contractors) and by firms in the private construction (133 or 19 percent); mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction (68 or 10 percent); and manufacturing (67 or 9 percent) industry sectors.

The majority of contractors (381 or 54 percent) were working in construction and extraction occupations when fatally injured. Decedents in this occupation group were most often employed as construction laborers (101), first-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers (42), electricians (39), and roofers (32). Among contractors who were employed outside the construction and extraction occupations group, the largest number of fatal occupational injuries was incurred by heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers (50); tree trimmers and pruners (16); security guards (15); landscaping and groundskeeping workers (14); welders, cutters, solderers, and brazers (14); and athletes and sports competitors (13).

For more detailed information on fatal injuries incurred by contract workers, see the 2012 charts at www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.

State and metropolitan statistical area (MSA)

Sixteen states and the District of Columbia reported higher numbers of fatal work injuries in 2012 than in 2011, while 32 states reported lower numbers. Two states reported the same number as in 2011. For more detailed state results, contact the individual state agency responsible for the collection of CFOI data in that state. Although data for Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam are not included in the national totals for this release, results for these jurisdictions are available. Participating agencies and their telephone numbers are listed in Table 6.


7

Counts for over 300 MSAs are also available for 2012 from CFOI and detailed data are available formore than 50 MSAs. The MSAs with the most fatal occupational injuries in 2012 were New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island (NY-NJ-PA) with 178, Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown (TX) with 90, Chicago-Joliet-Naperville (IL-IN-WI) with 81, and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana (CA) with 81.

For more detailed information on fatal injuries by state and MSA, see the 2012 tables at www.bls.gov/iif/oshcfoi1.htm.

Background of the program

The Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI), part of the BLS Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (OSHS) program, compiles a count of all fatal work injuries occurring in the U.S. during the calendar year. The CFOI program uses diverse state, federal, and independent data sources to identify, verify, and describe fatal work injuries. This assures counts are as complete and accurate as possible.For the 2012 data, over 19,000 unique source documents were reviewed as part of the data collection process.

The Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII), another component of the OSHS program, presents frequency counts and incidence rates by industry and also by detailed case circumstances and worker characteristics for nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses for cases that result in days away from work. Incidence rates for 2012 by industry and case type will be published in October 2013, and information on 2012 case circumstances and worker characteristics will be available in November 2013.For additional data, access the BLS Internet site: www.bls.gov/iif/. For technical information and definitions for the CFOI program, please go to the BLS Handbook of Methods on the BLS website at www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/homch9.pdf.


Table 1. Fatal occupational injuries by event or exposure, 2011-2012

Event or exposure120112 2012p

Number Percent

Total ................................................................................................................... 4,693 4,383 100

Violence and other injuries by persons or animals .......................................... 791 767 17Homicides - intentional injury by other person ................................................... 468 463 11

Shooting by other person - intentional ........................................................... 365 375 9Stabbing, cutting, slashing, piercing ............................................................... 42 32 1

Self-inflicted injury - intentional .......................................................................... 250 225 5

Transportation incidents ..................................................................................... 1,937 1,789 41Roadway incidents involving motorized land vehicle ......................................... 1,103 1,044 24

Roadway collision with other vehicle .............................................................. 525 512 12Roadway collision - moving in same direction ........................................... 150 110 3Roadway collision - moving in opposite directions, oncoming ................... 172 186 4Roadway collision - moving perpendicularly .............................................. 111 124 3

Roadway collision with object other than vehicle ........................................... 313 300 7Vehicle struck object or animal on side of roadway ................................... 292 282 6

Roadway noncollision incident ....................................................................... 262 228 5Jack-knifed or overturned, roadway ........................................................... 208 187 4

Nonroadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles .................................. 222 227 5Jack-knifed or overturned, nonroadway ..................................................... 113 111 3

Pedestrian vehicular incident ............................................................................. 316 283 6Pedestrian struck by vehicle in work zone ..................................................... 63 65 1

Rail vehicle incidents .......................................................................................... 50 33 1Water vehicle incidents ...................................................................................... 72 64 1Aircraft incidents ................................................................................................. 145 125 3

Fires and explosions ........................................................................................... 144 116 3

Falls, slips, trips ................................................................................................... 681 668 15Falls to lower level .............................................................................................. 553 544 12

Fall from collapsing structure or equipment ................................................... 38 35 1Fall through surface or existing opening ........................................................ 60 71 2

Fall on same level .............................................................................................. 111 108 2

Exposure to harmful substances or environments .......................................... 419 320 7Exposure to electricity ........................................................................................ 174 156 4Exposure to temperature extremes .................................................................... 63 40 1Exposure to other harmful substances ............................................................... 144 94 2

Inhalation of harmful substance ..................................................................... 57 40 1

Contact with objects and equipment ................................................................. 710 712 16Struck by object or equipment ............................................................................ 476 509 12

Struck by falling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle ............... 219 233 5Struck by discharged or flying object ............................................................. 24 27 1

Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects ............................................ 145 122 3Caught in running equipment or machinery ................................................... 118 92 2

Struck, caught, or crushed in collapsing structure, equipment, or material ........ 84 74 2

1 Based on the BLS Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) 2.01 implemented for 2011 dataforward.

2 Totals for 2011 are revised and final. The BLS news release issued September 20, 2012, reported a total of4,609 fatal work injuries for calendar year 2011. Since then, an additional 84 job-related fatal injuries were identified,bringing the total job-related fatal injury count for 2011 to 4,693.

p Data for 2012 are preliminary. Revised and final 2012 data are scheduled to be released in Spring 2014.NOTE: Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. Percentages may not add to

totals because of rounding. CFOI fatality counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injury event.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, in cooperation with State, New York City, District

of Columbia, and Federal agencies, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries

8


Table 2. Fatal occupational injuries by industry and selected event or exposure, 2012p

Industry1Fatal injuries Selected event or exposure2

(percent of total for industry)

Number Percent Homicides Roadway3 Falls, slips, trips Struck by objector equipment

Total ............................................................................................. 4,383 100 11 24 15 12

Private industry ............................................................................... 3,945 90 10 24 16 12

Goods producing ........................................................................... 1,741 40 1 15 21 17

Natural resources and mining .................................................... 652 15 – 17 8 23Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting ..................................... 475 11 – 12 7 25

Crop production ....................................................................... 204 5 – 13 5 23Animal production .................................................................... 141 3 – 16 9 16Forestry and logging ................................................................ 62 1 – – 5 74

Mining4 ........................................................................................ 177 4 – 30 13 18Mining, except oil and gas ....................................................... 38 1 – 8 13 24Support activities for mining .................................................... 114 3 – 38 11 16

Construction ................................................................................ 775 18 1 14 36 10Construction ................................................................................ 775 18 1 14 36 10

Construction of buildings ......................................................... 133 3 2 9 50 8Heavy and civil engineering construction ................................ 169 4 – 25 11 15Specialty trade contractors ...................................................... 456 10 5( ) 11 41 9

Manufacturing .............................................................................. 314 7 6 15 12 19Manufacturing .............................................................................. 314 7 6 15 12 19

Food manufacturing ................................................................. 41 1 10 24 17 10Fabricated metal product manufacturing ................................. 43 1 2 – 7 33

Service providing .......................................................................... 2,204 50 16 30 12 9

Trade, transportation, and utilities ............................................ 1,152 26 14 42 9 8Wholesale trade ........................................................................... 191 4 6 34 15 17

Merchant wholesalers, durable goods ..................................... 103 2 8 32 13 22Merchant wholesalers, nondurable goods ............................... 83 2 – 35 18 11

Retail trade .................................................................................. 262 6 40 18 15 7Motor vehicle and parts dealers .............................................. 43 1 23 23 – 12Food and beverage stores ....................................................... 63 1 65 6 11 2

Transportation and warehousing ................................................. 677 15 7 54 5 6Truck transportation ................................................................. 456 10 1 71 4 6Transit and ground passenger transportation .......................... 54 1 63 26 – –

Utilities ......................................................................................... 22 1 – 23 – 18Information ................................................................................... 38 1 13 47 – –Financial activities ....................................................................... 81 2 23 16 25 7

Finance and insurance ................................................................ 20 5( ) – – 30 –Real estate and rental and leasing .............................................. 61 1 26 18 23 8

Professional and business services .......................................... 388 9 7 18 19 16Professional and technical services ............................................ 54 1 – 28 17 –Administrative and waste services .............................................. 332 8 8 17 19 19

Educational and health services ................................................ 139 3 15 22 14 2Educational services .................................................................... 33 1 – – 18 –Health care and social assistance ............................................... 106 2 18 28 13 3

Leisure and hospitality ............................................................... 220 5 35 12 11 4Arts, entertainment, and recreation ............................................. 78 2 8 9 14 8Accommodation and food services .............................................. 142 3 50 13 10 –

Other services, except public administration ........................... 183 4 26 13 7 15

Government6 ................................................................................... 438 10 17 26 10 4

Federal government ........................................................................ 97 2 7 16 7 –State government ............................................................................ 87 2 15 29 11 3Local government ............................................................................ 250 6 22 30 10 5

1 Industry data are based on the North American Industry Classification System, 2007.2 Based on the BLS Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) 2.01 implemented for 2011 data forward. The figure shown is the percent of the total

fatal injuries for that industry group.3 "Roadway" includes deaths to vehicle occupants resulting from traffic incidents that occur on the public roadway, shoulder, or surrounding area. It excludes incidents

occurring entirely off the roadway, such as in parking lots and on farms; incidents involving trains; and deaths to pedestrians or other nonpassengers.4 Includes fatal injuries at all establishments categorized as Mining (Sector 21) in the North American Industry Classification System, 2007, including establishments not

governed by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) rules and reporting, such as those in Oil and Gas Extraction.5 Less than or equal to 0.5 percent.6 Includes fatal injuries to workers employed by governmental organizations regardless of industry.p Data for 2012 are preliminary. Revised and final 2012 data are scheduled to be released in Spring 2014.NOTE: Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. Percentages may not add to totals because of rounding. Dashes indicate no data

reported or data that do not meet publication criteria. CFOI fatality counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injury event. There were three fatal injuriesfor which there was insufficient information to determine a specific industry classification.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, in cooperation with State, New York City, District of Columbia, and Federal agencies, Census of FatalOccupational Injuries

9


Table 3. Fatal occupational injuries by occupation and selected event or exposure, 2012p

Occupation1

Fatal injuries Selected event or exposure2(percent of total for occupation)

Number Percent Homicides Roadway3 Falls, slips,trips

Struck byobject or

equipment

Total ................................................................................................................... 4,383 100 11 24 15 12

Management occupations ................................................................................... 429 10 13 13 11 13Top executives ................................................................................................... 30 1 10 33 – –Operations specialties managers ....................................................................... 23 1 13 26 – –Other management occupations ........................................................................ 365 8 13 10 12 15

Business and financial operations occupations ............................................... 22 1 18 45 14 –Computer and mathematical occupations ......................................................... 8 4( ) 12 – – –Architecture and engineering occupations ....................................................... 33 1 – 33 12 9

Engineers ........................................................................................................... 22 1 – 32 – –Life, physical, and social science occupations ................................................ 19 4( ) 11 32 – –Community and social services occupations ................................................... 37 1 38 22 – –Legal occupations ................................................................................................ 8 4( ) – – – –Education, training, and library occupations .................................................... 24 1 – – 25 –Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media occupations .......................... 44 1 11 7 16 –

Entertainers and performers, sports and related workers .................................. 27 1 – – – –Healthcare practitioners and technical occupations ........................................ 49 1 – 31 14 –

Health diagnosing and treating practitioners ...................................................... 29 1 – 17 14 –Health technologists and technicians ................................................................. 17 4( ) – 59 – –

Healthcare support occupations ........................................................................ 10 4( ) – 40 30 –Protective service occupations .......................................................................... 224 5 40 22 4 3

Fire fighting and prevention workers .................................................................. 18 4( ) 11 33 6 –Law enforcement workers .................................................................................. 119 3 41 29 3 –Other protective service workers ........................................................................ 68 2 49 6 7 –

Food preparation and serving related occupations ......................................... 53 1 34 13 19 –Supervisors, food preparation and serving workers ........................................... 14 4( ) 50 – – –

Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance occupations ...................... 245 6 4 10 27 22Building cleaning and pest control workers ........................................................ 49 1 16 16 29 –Grounds maintenance workers .......................................................................... 156 4 – 8 28 29

Personal care and service occupations ............................................................. 64 1 33 14 8 –Sales and related occupations ........................................................................... 216 5 51 12 11 2

Supervisors, sales workers ................................................................................ 106 2 57 6 7 3Retail sales workers ........................................................................................... 63 1 63 5 16 –Sales representatives, services ......................................................................... 10 4( ) – 30 30 –Sales representatives, wholesale and manufacturing ........................................ 15 4( ) – 60 – –

Office and administrative support occupations ................................................ 82 2 23 24 16 5Material recording, scheduling, dispatching, and distributing workers ............... 47 1 11 30 15 6

Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations ...................................................... 245 6 – 12 5 31Agricultural workers ............................................................................................ 139 3 – 18 6 17Fishing and hunting workers .............................................................................. 34 1 – 3 6 –Forest, conservation, and logging workers ........................................................ 64 1 – – 5 75

Construction and extraction occupations ......................................................... 838 19 1 13 35 10Supervisors, construction and extraction workers .............................................. 117 3 1 18 33 12Construction trades workers .............................................................................. 577 13 1 10 40 8Extraction workers .............................................................................................. 86 2 – 26 15 22

Installation, maintenance, and repair occupations ........................................... 326 7 5 16 13 24Vehicle and mobile equipment mechanics, installers, and repairers ................. 104 2 6 12 3 46Other installation, maintenance, and repair occupations ................................... 179 4 3 15 18 13

Production occupations ...................................................................................... 211 5 6 8 14 16Supervisors, production workers ........................................................................ 22 1 – – – –Metal workers and plastic workers ..................................................................... 82 2 4 11 12 18

Transportation and material moving occupations ............................................ 1,150 26 6 50 6 9Air transportation workers .................................................................................. 71 2 – – – –Motor vehicle operators ...................................................................................... 817 19 7 67 5 6Water transportation workers ............................................................................. 13 4( ) – – – –Material moving workers .................................................................................... 207 5 4 12 14 21

Military occupations5 .......................................................................................... 43 1 7 7 – –

1 Occupation data are based on the Standard Occupational Classification system, 2010.2 Based on the BLS Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) 2.01 implemented for 2011 data forward. The figure shown is the percent of the total

fatal injuries for that occupation group.3 "Roadway" includes deaths to vehicle occupants resulting from traffic incidents that occur on the public roadway, shoulder, or surrounding area. It excludes incidents

occurring entirely off the roadway, such as in parking lots and on farms; incidents involving trains; and deaths to pedestrians or other non passengers.4 Less than or equal to 0.5 percent.5 Includes fatal injuries to persons identified as resident armed forces regardless of individual occupation listed.p Data for 2012 are preliminary. Revised and final 2012 data are scheduled to be released in Spring 2014.NOTE: Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. Percentages may not add to totals because of rounding. Dashes indicate no data

reported or data that do not meet publication criteria. CFOI fatality counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injury event. There were three fatalinjuries for which there was insufficient information to determine a specific occupation classification.


10


Table 4. Fatal occupational injuries by selected worker characteristics and selected event or exposure, 2012p

Characteristic

Fatal injuries Selected event or exposure1(percent of total for characteristic category)

Number Percent Homicides Roadway2 Falls, slips,trips

Struck byobject or

equipment

Total ..................................................................................................... 4,383 100 11 24 15 12

Employee status

Wage and salary3 ................................................................................ 3,396 77 10 27 15 11Self-employed4 .................................................................................... 987 23 14 13 16 15

Gender

Men ...................................................................................................... 4,045 92 9 24 15 12Women ................................................................................................ 338 8 29 21 16 4

Age5

Under 16 years .................................................................................... 19 6( ) – 5 – 1616-17 years .......................................................................................... 9 6( ) – 33 11 –18-19 years .......................................................................................... 58 1 12 24 12 1220-24 years .......................................................................................... 275 6 11 25 7 1125-34 years .......................................................................................... 703 16 14 23 11 935-44 years .......................................................................................... 792 18 12 25 13 1145-54 years .......................................................................................... 1,102 25 10 25 17 1055-64 years .......................................................................................... 869 20 9 23 17 1365 years and over ................................................................................ 552 13 6 22 23 16

Race or ethnic origin7

White, non-Hispanic ............................................................................ 3,002 68 8 25 15 12Black or African-American, non-Hispanic ............................................ 446 10 22 26 9 9Hispanic or Latino ................................................................................ 708 16 9 22 21 14American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic ................................ 34 1 – 15 9 15Asian, non-Hispanic ............................................................................. 137 3 36 12 18 5Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic .............................. 7 6( ) – – – –Multiple races, non-Hispanic ............................................................... 5 6( ) 20 – – –Other or not reported, non-Hispanic .................................................... 44 1 20 23 14 –

1 Based on the BLS Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) 2.01 implemented for 2011 data forward. The figure shown is thepercent of the total fatal injuries for that demographic characteristic.

2 "Roadway" includes deaths to vehicle occupants resulting from traffic incidents that occur on the public roadway, shoulder, or surrounding area. Itexcludes incidents occurring entirely off the roadway, such as in parking lots and on farms; incidents involving trains; and deaths to pedestrians or othernonpassengers.

3 May include volunteers and workers receiving other types of compensation. 4 Includes self-employed workers, owners of unincorporated businesses and farms, paid and unpaid family workers, and may include some owners of

incorporated businesses or members of partnerships.5 There were four fatal injuries for which there was insufficient information to determine the age of the decedent. 6 Less than or equal to 0.5 percent.7 Persons identified as Hispanic or Latino may be of any race. The race categories shown exclude Hispanic and Latino workers.p Data for 2012 are preliminary. Revised and final 2012 data are scheduled to be released in Spring 2014.NOTE: Totals for major categories may include subcategories not shown separately. Percentages may not add to totals because of rounding. Dashes

indicate no data reported or data that do not meet publication criteria. CFOI fatality counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injuryevent.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, in cooperation with State, New York City, District of Columbia, and Federal agencies,Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries

11


Table 5. Fatal occupational injuries by state and event or exposure, 2011-2012

State of injury

Total fatal injuries1 Event or exposure42012

20112(revised) 20123,p

Violenceand otherinjuries bypersons oranimals5

Transpor-tation

incidents6Fires andexplosions

Falls, slips,trips

Exposure toharmful sub-stances orenviron-ments

Contact withobjects andequipment

Total .................................................................................... 4,693 4,383 767 1,789 116 668 320 712

Alabama .................................................................................. 75 81 20 28 – 8 4 20Alaska ...................................................................................... 39 30 9 16 – – – 4Arizona .................................................................................... 69 37 11 14 – – – 7Arkansas ................................................................................. 93 63 13 23 5 5 8 9California ................................................................................. 390 339 67 129 6 54 22 60Colorado .................................................................................. 92 80 15 32 4 15 3 10Connecticut ............................................................................. 37 36 13 9 1 7 – 5Delaware ................................................................................. 10 14 4 6 – – – –District of Columbia ................................................................. 9 11 5 – – 4 – –Florida ..................................................................................... 226 209 44 65 6 42 23 28Georgia .................................................................................... 111 76 19 24 3 15 6 9Hawaii ...................................................................................... 26 19 3 3 – 8 – 4Idaho ....................................................................................... 37 18 – 11 – – – 4Illinois ...................................................................................... 177 145 32 52 8 24 10 17Indiana ..................................................................................... 125 113 13 56 – 15 6 21Iowa ......................................................................................... 93 84 5 44 – 9 4 19Kansas .................................................................................... 78 75 7 49 3 2 – 13Kentucky .................................................................................. 93 84 16 40 – 8 3 15Louisiana ................................................................................. 111 106 16 47 5 13 11 14Maine ....................................................................................... 26 19 – 8 – 4 3 4Maryland .................................................................................. 71 70 14 23 – 14 8 11Massachusetts ........................................................................ 68 33 7 13 – 7 1 5Michigan .................................................................................. 141 127 40 42 – 21 4 17Minnesota ................................................................................ 60 70 11 28 3 8 6 14Mississippi ............................................................................... 63 60 13 22 – 7 3 13Missouri ................................................................................... 132 83 10 42 – 15 7 8Montana .................................................................................. 49 34 2 13 – 7 3 7Nebraska ................................................................................. 39 48 – 25 – 6 5 10Nevada .................................................................................... 38 42 15 15 – 6 – 6New Hampshire ....................................................................... 9 13 – 3 1 – – 4New Jersey .............................................................................. 99 90 22 34 1 11 8 14New Mexico ............................................................................. 52 35 3 16 – 6 5 4New York (including N.Y.C.) .................................................... 206 196 40 61 5 47 11 32

New York City ...................................................................... 72 75 26 13 – 21 6 7North Carolina ......................................................................... 148 138 32 52 – 18 13 22North Dakota ........................................................................... 44 64 3 39 5 7 – 8Ohio ......................................................................................... 155 154 22 52 3 32 10 35Oklahoma ................................................................................ 86 94 7 51 4 9 11 12Oregon .................................................................................... 58 43 11 20 – 6 – 5Pennsylvania ........................................................................... 186 163 22 63 6 23 14 35Rhode Island ........................................................................... 7 8 – 3 – – – –South Carolina ......................................................................... 81 62 12 28 – 8 8 6South Dakota ........................................................................... 31 31 3 17 – 4 2 5Tennessee ............................................................................... 120 100 24 34 – 18 5 16Texas ....................................................................................... 433 531 66 258 22 75 44 65Utah ......................................................................................... 39 39 7 16 – 4 3 7Vermont ................................................................................... 8 10 1 3 – – 4 –Virginia .................................................................................... 127 146 18 62 – 28 8 29Washington ............................................................................. 60 64 6 26 – 14 7 11West Virginia ........................................................................... 43 47 6 18 1 3 7 12Wisconsin ................................................................................ 89 114 27 37 3 16 5 26Wyoming ................................................................................. 32 35 5 17 – 4 – 7

1 State totals include other events and exposures, such as bodily reaction, in addition to those shown separately.2 Totals for 2011 are revised and final. Preliminary 2011 data issued September 20, 2012, reported a total of 4,609 fatal work injuries for calendar year 2011. Since then,

an additional 84 job-related fatal injuries were identified, bringing the total job-related fatal injury count for 2011 to 4,693. Includes two fatal injuries that occurred within theterritorial boundaries of the United States, but a State of incident could not be determined.

3 Includes zero fatal injuries that occurred within the territorial boundaries of the United States, but a State of incident could not be determined.4 Based on the BLS Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) 2.01 implemented for 2011 data forward.5 Includes violence by persons, self-inflicted injuries, and attacks by animals.6 Includes roadway, nonroadway, air, water, and rail fatal injuries, and fatal injuries resulting from being struck by a vehicle.p Data for 2012 are preliminary. Revised and final 2012 data are scheduled to be released in Spring 2014.

NOTE: Dashes indicate no data reported or data that do not meet publication criteria. CFOI fatality counts exclude illness-related deaths unless precipitated by an injuryevent.


12


13

Table 6. CFOI participating agencies and telephone numbers

State Agency Telephone numberAlabama Department of Labor (334) 242-3463 Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development (907) 465-4539 Arizona Industrial Commission (602) 542-3737 Arkansas Department of Labor (501) 682-4542 California Department of Industrial Relations (626) 472-0446 ext. 5443 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (303) 691-4938 Connecticut Department of Labor (860) 263-6933 Delaware Department of Labor (302) 761-8219 Dist. of Columbia Department of Health (202) 442-9010 Florida Bureau of Labor Statistics - Atlanta Region (404) 893-8339 Georgia Office of Insurance and Safety Fire Commissioner (404) 463-0737 Hawaii Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (808) 586-9002 Idaho Department of Labor (208) 332-3570 ext. 3220 Illinois Department of Public Health (312) 814-8194 Indiana Department of Labor (317) 232-2668 Iowa Division of Labor Services (515) 281-5151 Kansas Department of Labor (785) 296-5000 ext. 2595 Kentucky Labor Cabinet (502) 564-4136 Louisiana Workforce Commission (225) 342-3126 Maine Bureau of Labor Standards (207) 623-7905 Maryland Division of Labor and Industry (410) 527-4463 Massachusetts Department of Public Health (617) 624-5679 Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (517) 322-1851 Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (651) 284-5568 Mississippi Department of Health (601) 576-7186 Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (573) 751-0807 Montana Department of Labor and Industry (406) 444-3297 Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court (402) 471-3547 Nevada Division of Industrial Relations (702) 486-9197 New Hampshire Division of Vital Records Administration (603) 271-4647 New Jersey Department of Health (609) 826-4984 New Mexico Occupational Health and Safety Bureau (505) 476-8740 New York State Department of Health and Injury Prevention (518) 402-7900 New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (646) 632-6729 North Carolina Department of Labor (919) 733-0337 North Dakota Bureau of Labor Statistics - Chicago Region (312) 353-7253 Ohio Department of Health (614) 644-0135 Oklahoma Department of Labor (405) 521-6858 Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services (503) 947-7364 Pennsylvania Department of Health (717) 783-2548 Rhode Island Department of Health (401) 222-8051 South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (803) 896-7673 South Dakota Bureau of Labor Statistics - Chicago Region (312) 353-7253 Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development (615) 741-1749 Texas Dept. of Insurance, Div. of Workers' Compensation (512) 804-4658 Utah Labor Commission, Statistics Program (801) 530-6823 Vermont Department of Labor (802) 828-5985 Virginia Department of Labor and Industry (804) 786-1035 Washington Department of Labor and Industries (360) 902-5510 West Virginia Bureau of Labor Statistics - Philadelphia Region (215) 861-5637 Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (608) 221-6293 Wyoming Department of Workforce Services (307) 473-3810 Guam Department of Labor (671) 475-7056 Puerto Rico Negociado de Estadisticas (787) 754-5300 ext. 3056 U.S. Virgin Islands Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (340) 776-3700 ext. 2019


14

TECHNICAL NOTES

Identification and verification of work-related fatalities

In 2012, there were 12 cases included for which work relationship could not be independently verified; however, the information on the initiating source document for these cases was sufficient to determine that the incident was likely to be job-related. Data for these fatalities are included in the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) counts. An additional 69 fatalities submitted by states were not included because the source documents had insufficient information to determine work relationship and could not be verified by either an independent source document or a follow-up questionnaire.

States may identify additional fatal work injuries after data collection closeout for a reference year. In addition, other fatalities excluded from the published count because of insufficient information to determine work relationship may subsequently be verified as work related. States have up to 7 months from this release to update their initial published state counts. This procedure ensures that fatality data are disseminated as quickly as possible and that legitimate cases are not excluded from the revisedcounts. Thus, each year's initial release of data should be considered preliminary. Revised data are released in the Spring of the following year; revised counts for 2012 will be available in 2014.

Over the last 3 years, increases in the published counts based on additional information have averaged 146 fatalities per year or about 3 percent of the revised total. The BLS news release issued September 20, 2012, reported a total of 4,609 fatal work injuries for 2011. With the April 2013 release of reviseddata, an additional 84 net fatal work injuries were added, bringing the total for 2011 to 4,693.

Federal/State agency coverage

The Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries includes data for all fatal work injuries, whether the decedent was working in a job covered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) or other federal or state agencies or was outside the scope of regulatory coverage. Thus, any comparison between the BLS fatality census counts and those released by other agencies should take into account the different coverage requirements and definitions being used by each agency.

Acknowledgements

BLS thanks the participating states, New York City, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam for their efforts in collecting accurate, comprehensive, and useful data on fatal work injuries. BLS also appreciates the efforts of all federal, state, local, and private sector entities that submitted source documents used to identify fatal work injuries. Among these agencies are the Occupational Safety and Health Administration; the National Transportation Safety Board; the U.S. Coast Guard; the Mine Safety and Health Administration; the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (Federal Employees’ Compensation and Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation divisions); the Federal Railroad Administration; the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; state vital statistics registrars, coroners, and medical examiners; state departments of health, labor and industries, and workers’ compensation agencies; state and local police departments; and state farm bureaus.

Information in this release is available to sensory-impaired individuals. Voice phone: (202) 606-7828; TDD phone: (202) 606-5897; TDD message referral phone: 1-800-326-2577.


ADOT Program Standard Roll Out Minutes and Roadmap 11.08.13

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

State Safety Oversight Program ADOT and City of Tucson / Sun Link Streetcar Meeting

MINUTES

ADOT: State Safety Oversight Program Page 1 of 1

Date/Time: Friday, October 4, 2013, 8 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Location: Sun Link Offices in Tuscon, AZ Attendees: Arizona Department of Transportation:

Herman Ray Bernal, ADOT, State Safety Oversight Manager Mignon Allen, Dovetail Consulting, ADOT SSO Contractor Fred Mead, Dovetail Consulting, ADOT SSO Contractor

City of Tucson:

Shellie Ginn, Project Manager City of Tucson Mike Barton, Project Manager, HDR John Zukas, Transit Coordinator, City of Tucson Joan Beckim, Public Outreach Mary McLain, Assistant General Manager, Safety Program

Sun Link:

Steve Bethel, General Manager, Sun Link Cleve Cleveland, Operations Manager, Sun Link Marwan Al-Mukhtar, Chief Safety and Security, Sun Link John Kortekaas, Maintenance Manager, Sun Link

Federal Transit Administration – Project Management Oversight Consultant:

Tom Kuimjian Tom Luglio

Handouts: Agenda, Program Standard (Revision 4) Discussion: 1. Herman Bernal opened the meeting and thanked the City of Tucson and Sun Link staff for agreeing to meet

with ADOT to discuss the state safety oversight program. 2. After introductions, Mr. Bernal reviewed the meeting objectives, which included the following:

a. To review and discuss the adopted ADOT Program Standard with appropriate City of Tucson/Sun Link stakeholders that have rail system safety and/or rail system security program responsibilities.

b. To respond to any questions raised by City of Tucson/Sun Link stakeholders regarding their implementation of the requirements of the State Safety Oversight program.

c. To establish a specific schedule for the City of Tucson/Sun Link’s submittal of the Initial Submissions to ADOT.

d. To establish a regular meeting schedule between ADOT and Sun Link to ensure compliance with the SSO program requirements.

3. Mr. Bernal requested that Mignon Allen discuss the Program Standard and Initial Submission requirements. 4. Following a brief overview of the document, Ms. Allen walked through each of the thirteen sections of the

Program Standard and responded to questions regarding Sun Link’s implementation requirements. Highlights of the discussion included the following:

a. Program Management – ADOT mentioned the current comment period for the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Section 5329 of MAP-21 and encouraged City of Tucson and Sun Link to respond. Mr. Zukas confirmed that the City is actively reviewing and responding to the questions.

b. Program Standard – ADOT noted that the Program Standard is now on an annual review cycle. c. System Safety Program Plan – ADOT discussed FTA’s Safety Management System and SSPP

outline. d. System Security Plan – ADOT clarified with Sun Link that Sun Link intends to submit a Security

and Emergency Preparedness Plan. e. Internal Audit – ADOT clarified the requirements for conducting internal audits and when the first

annual report would be due for submittal to ADOT.




MINUTES


Date/Time: Friday, October 4, 2013, 8 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Location: Sun Link Offices in Tuscon, AZ Attendees: Arizona Department of Transportation:

Herman Ray Bernal, ADOT, State Safety Oversight Manager Mignon Allen, Dovetail Consulting, ADOT SSO Contractor Fred Mead, Dovetail Consulting, ADOT SSO Contractor

City of Tucson:

Shellie Ginn, Project Manager City of Tucson Mike Barton, Project Manager, HDR John Zukas, Transit Coordinator, City of Tucson Joan Beckim, Public Outreach Mary McLain, Assistant General Manager, Safety Program

Sun Link:

Steve Bethel, General Manager, Sun Link Cleve Cleveland, Operations Manager, Sun Link Marwan Al-Mukhtar, Chief Safety and Security, Sun Link John Kortekaas, Maintenance Manager, Sun Link

Federal Transit Administration – Project Management Oversight Consultant:

Tom Kuimjian Tom Luglio

Handouts: Agenda, Program Standard (Revision 4) Discussion: 1. Herman Bernal opened the meeting and thanked the City of Tucson and Sun Link staff for agreeing to meet

with ADOT to discuss the state safety oversight program. 2. After introductions, Mr. Bernal reviewed the meeting objectives, which included the following:

a. To review and discuss the adopted ADOT Program Standard with appropriate City of Tucson/Sun Link stakeholders that have rail system safety and/or rail system security program responsibilities.

b. To respond to any questions raised by City of Tucson/Sun Link stakeholders regarding their implementation of the requirements of the State Safety Oversight program.

c. To establish a specific schedule for the City of Tucson/Sun Link’s submittal of the Initial Submissions to ADOT.

d. To establish a regular meeting schedule between ADOT and Sun Link to ensure compliance with the SSO program requirements.

3. Mr. Bernal requested that Mignon Allen discuss the Program Standard and Initial Submission requirements. 4. Following a brief overview of the document, Ms. Allen walked through each of the thirteen sections of the

Program Standard and responded to questions regarding Sun Link’s implementation requirements. Highlights of the discussion included the following:

a. Program Management – ADOT mentioned the current comment period for the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Section 5329 of MAP-21 and encouraged City of Tucson and Sun Link to respond. Mr. Zukas confirmed that the City is actively reviewing and responding to the questions.

b. Program Standard – ADOT noted that the Program Standard is now on an annual review cycle. c. System Safety Program Plan – ADOT discussed FTA’s Safety Management System and SSPP

outline. d. System Security Plan – ADOT clarified with Sun Link that Sun Link intends to submit a Security

and Emergency Preparedness Plan. e. Internal Audit – ADOT clarified the requirements for conducting internal audits and when the first

annual report would be due for submittal to ADOT.




MINUTES


f. Hazard Management – ADOT explained the quarterly hazard management meeting requirements, the annual calendar of activities, unacceptable hazards, hazard tracking log, and annual on-site monitoring exercises.

g. Accident/Incident Investigation – ADOT reviewed the requirements for courtesy and ADOT-reportable notifications and investigations, including notification requirements during the engineering/construction phase.

h. SSO Reviews – ADOT discussed the date of the first three-year review of Sun Link scheduled for 2017. ADOT also acknowledged the upcoming FTA Safety and Security Readiness Review of Sun Link scheduled for January 2014.

i. Corrective Action Plans – ADOT went over the requirements for CAP sources/identification, the CAP log, and the CAP Review Checklist.

j. FTA Reporting and Certification – ADOT advised Sun Link of the annual reporting requirements and SSO certification process.

k. Safety and Security Certification Plan – ADOT reviewed this new section of the Standard. ADOT and Sun Link agreed that given the fact that the project has completed construction, is actively testing, and well past the Final design phase, ADOT should revisit the requirements for review the SSCP and develop a more appropriate course of action regarding the SSCP that fits the stage of the project.

l. Training – ADOT indicated this was a new, placeholder section of the Standard until the rulemaking process was complete for MAP-21, Section 5329.

m. Transit Asset Management Plan – ADOT explained that this was also a new, placeholder section of the Standard until the rulemaking process was complete for MAP-21, Section 5329.

n. Engineering and Construction – ADOT reviewed this new section of the Standard and discussed the oversight responsibilities during each phase of project development – the design criteria conformance, construction/specification conformance, testing, pre-revenue operations, and project turn over phases.

5. Ms. Allen explained that in order to develop an agreed upon schedule for the Sun Link’s submittal of the

Initial Submissions to ADOT, that ADOT must be aware of the official Revenue Operations Date (ROD) for Sun Link. Mr. Bethel replied that the ROD is July 2014.

6. Ms. Allen advised the Sun Link that FTA requires that ADOT provide certification that it has reviewed and

approved the Sun Link’s Initial Submissions no later than sixty (60) days prior to the initiation of revenue service. With an ROD of June 2014, ADOT must approve Sun Link’s plans no later than May 2014.

7. Given the timeframes established above, Ms. Allen requested Sun Link advise ADOT when to expect the

submittal of the Initial Submissions. Mr. Zukas and Mr. Bethel responded all plans required by the Program Standard will be submitted by end of November 2013.

8. Ms. Allen reviewed the list of plans that Sun Link committed to provide to ADOT for review and approval

by end of November 2013:

a. System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) b. Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan (SEPP)

ADOT and Sun Link agreed to schedule a follow up discussion to determine when the remaining documents would be submitted to ADOT for review:

c. Internal Audit Program Plan (IAPP), including the Internal Audit Findings Tracking Log d. Hazard Management Plan (HMP), including the Hazard Tracking Log e. Accident/Incident Investigation Plan (AIP), including the Accident/Incident Tracking Log f. Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Program, including the CAP Log

9. At the end of the meeting, ADOT and Sun Link developed and agreed to the following schedule for

coordination meetings and required submittals:



MINUTES


f. Hazard Management – ADOT explained the quarterly hazard management meeting requirements, the annual calendar of activities, unacceptable hazards, hazard tracking log, and annual on-site monitoring exercises.

g. Accident/Incident Investigation – ADOT reviewed the requirements for courtesy and ADOT-reportable notifications and investigations, including notification requirements during the engineering/construction phase.

h. SSO Reviews – ADOT discussed the date of the first three-year review of Sun Link scheduled for 2017. ADOT also acknowledged the upcoming FTA Safety and Security Readiness Review of Sun Link scheduled for January 2014.

i. Corrective Action Plans – ADOT went over the requirements for CAP sources/identification, the CAP log, and the CAP Review Checklist.

j. FTA Reporting and Certification – ADOT advised Sun Link of the annual reporting requirements and SSO certification process.

k. Safety and Security Certification Plan – ADOT reviewed this new section of the Standard. ADOT and Sun Link agreed that given the fact that the project has completed construction, is actively testing, and well past the Final design phase, ADOT should revisit the requirements for review the SSCP and develop a more appropriate course of action regarding the SSCP that fits the stage of the project.

l. Training – ADOT indicated this was a new, placeholder section of the Standard until the rulemaking process was complete for MAP-21, Section 5329.

m. Transit Asset Management Plan – ADOT explained that this was also a new, placeholder section of the Standard until the rulemaking process was complete for MAP-21, Section 5329.

n. Engineering and Construction – ADOT reviewed this new section of the Standard and discussed the oversight responsibilities during each phase of project development – the design criteria conformance, construction/specification conformance, testing, pre-revenue operations, and project turn over phases.

5. Ms. Allen explained that in order to develop an agreed upon schedule for the Sun Link’s submittal of the

Initial Submissions to ADOT, that ADOT must be aware of the official Revenue Operations Date (ROD) for Sun Link. Mr. Bethel replied that the ROD is July 2014.

6. Ms. Allen advised the Sun Link that FTA requires that ADOT provide certification that it has reviewed and

approved the Sun Link’s Initial Submissions no later than sixty (60) days prior to the initiation of revenue service. With an ROD of June 2014, ADOT must approve Sun Link’s plans no later than May 2014.

7. Given the timeframes established above, Ms. Allen requested Sun Link advise ADOT when to expect the

submittal of the Initial Submissions. Mr. Zukas and Mr. Bethel responded all plans required by the Program Standard will be submitted by end of November 2013.

8. Ms. Allen reviewed the list of plans that Sun Link committed to provide to ADOT for review and approval

by end of November 2013:

a. System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) b. Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan (SEPP)

ADOT and Sun Link agreed to schedule a follow up discussion to determine when the remaining documents would be submitted to ADOT for review:

c. Internal Audit Program Plan (IAPP), including the Internal Audit Findings Tracking Log d. Hazard Management Plan (HMP), including the Hazard Tracking Log e. Accident/Incident Investigation Plan (AIP), including the Accident/Incident Tracking Log f. Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Program, including the CAP Log

9. At the end of the meeting, ADOT and Sun Link developed and agreed to the following schedule for

coordination meetings and required submittals:




MINUTES


Activity Who When Status

1. Adopt the Program Standard, Revision 4 ADOT August 2013 COMPLETE

2. Distribute the Program Standard, Revision 4 to Sun Link

ADOT August 2013 COMPLETE

3. Hold ADOT and Sun Link Coordination Meeting: To review adopted Program Standard To respond to questions To establish a specific schedule for submittal of

Initial Submissions to ADOT To establish a regular meeting schedule

between ADOT and Sun Link

ADOT Sun Link

October 4, 2013 COMPLETE

4. Submit the Initial Submissions (SSPP, SEPP) to ADOT for review.

5. Determine the submittal date for remaining Initial Submissions (IAPP, HMP, AIP, CAP).

Sun Link End of November 2013

PENDING

6. Hold ADOT and Sun Link Coordination Meeting: To discuss progress of Sun Link’s development

of remaining Initial Submissions To establish a specific schedule for submittal of

the remaining Initial Submissions to ADOT

ADOT Sun Link

December 2013 PENDING

7. Review Initial Submissions and complete Review Checklists, update as required.

8. Obtain responses to comments and revised plans from Sun Link.

ADOT December 2013-May 2014

PENDING

9. Complete the Initial Submission process and submit supporting documentation to FTA.

ADOT May 2014 PENDING

10. Revenue Operations Date Sun Link July 2014 PENDING



MINUTES


Activity Who When Status

1. Adopt the Program Standard, Revision 4 ADOT August 2013 COMPLETE

2. Distribute the Program Standard, Revision 4 to Sun Link

ADOT August 2013 COMPLETE

3. Hold ADOT and Sun Link Coordination Meeting: To review adopted Program Standard To respond to questions To establish a specific schedule for submittal of

Initial Submissions to ADOT To establish a regular meeting schedule

between ADOT and Sun Link

ADOT Sun Link

October 4, 2013 COMPLETE

4. Submit the Initial Submissions (SSPP, SEPP) to ADOT for review.

5. Determine the submittal date for remaining Initial Submissions (IAPP, HMP, AIP, CAP).

Sun Link End of November 2013

PENDING

6. Hold ADOT and Sun Link Coordination Meeting: To discuss progress of Sun Link’s development

of remaining Initial Submissions To establish a specific schedule for submittal of

the remaining Initial Submissions to ADOT

ADOT Sun Link

December 2013 PENDING

7. Review Initial Submissions and complete Review Checklists, update as required.

8. Obtain responses to comments and revised plans from Sun Link.

ADOT December 2013-May 2014

PENDING

9. Complete the Initial Submission process and submit supporting documentation to FTA.

ADOT May 2014 PENDING

10. Revenue Operations Date Sun Link July 2014 PENDING

76FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013



MINUTES


According to Table 1.6.1 of the Program Standard, a four-year look schedule of ADOT SSO program activities appears below:

SCHEDULE OF ADOT SSO PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

Program Area Plan / Document ADOT Activity Target Date of Completion by ADOT

Sun Link Activity

Target Date of Completion by Sun Link

2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

1. Program Standard Program Standard Prepares January 1 Comments January 31

2. System Safety Program Plan System Safety Program Plan

Approves or requests add’l info March 1 Submits January 31

Reviews and approves May 31 Provides add’l info April 30

3. System Security Plan Security and Emergency

Preparedness Plan



4. Internal Safety and Security Audits

Internal Audit Schedule Reviews and approves March 1 Submits February 1

Internal Audit Notification Reviews According to Sun Link three-year audit schedule Submits 30 days prior to audit date, according

to Sun Link three-year audit schedule

Internal Audit Procedures Approves or requests add’l info March 1 Submits January 31


Internal Audit Checklists Reviews According to Sun Link three-year audit schedule

At time of audit notification, according to Sun Link three-year

audit schedule

Internal Safety and Security Audit Findings Log Reviews Quarterly Submits Quarterly

77FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013



MINUTES




Sun Link Activity


2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

Internal Safety and Security Audit Annual Reports

Reviews and approves

March 1 Submits February 1

Internal Safety and Security Audit Letter of Certification

Reviews and approves

March 1 Submits February 1

Internal Safety and Security Audit Corrective Action Plans Reviews and approves Quarterly Submits Quarterly

5. Hazard Management Process Hazard Management Plan



Hazard Tracking Log Reviews and approves Quarterly Submits Quarterly

Hazard Management Meetings Plans and attends Quarterly Attends Quarterly

Unacceptable Hazard Notification Reviews As reported by Sun Link Submits Within 24 hours or by 5:00 p.m. the

next working day

Hazard Initial Investigation Report Reviews Within 30 calendar days of receipt Submits Within 7 calendar days

Hazard Status Investigation Report Reviews Within 30 calendar days of receipt Submits

Monthly

until investigation is complete

78FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013



MINUTES




Sun Link Activity


2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

Hazard Final Investigation Report Reviews and approves Within 30 calendar days of receipt Submits At completion of investigation

Hazard Corrective Action Plan Reviews and approves Within 30 calendar days of receipt Submits At completion of investigation, if applicable

Hazard Investigation Notification

(ADOT Independent) Notifies Within 7 calendar days of receipt of

Hazard Initial Investigation Report N/A N/A

Hazard Investigation Final Report

(ADOT Independent) Transmits Within 30 days after completion of

investigation N/A N/A

Hazard Investigation Correction Action Plan (ADOT Independent)

Reviews and approves Within 30 days after completion of investigation Comments Within 15 days after receipt of

ADOT Final Report

6. Accident/Incident Notification, Investigation, and Reporting

Accident Incident Investigation Plan



Authorization to Conduct Accident/Incident

Investigation

Blanket Authorization in Program Standard for Sun Link to

investigate all accidents/incidents on behalf of ADOT SSO

N/A N/A N/A

Accident/Incident Initial Reviews As reported Submits Within 2 hours of reportable event

79FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013



MINUTES




Sun Link Activity


2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

Telephone Notification

Accident/Incident Investigation Preliminary

Report Reviews Within 30 calendar days of receipt Submits Within 48 hours of reportable event

Accident/Incident Investigation Status Report Reviews Within 30 calendar days of receipt Submits Monthly

Accident/Incident Final Investigation Final Report Reviews and approves Within 30 calendar days of receipt Submits Within 30 calendar days of

completion of investigation

Accident/Incident Investigation Notification

(ADOT Independent) Notifies Within 7 calendar days of receipt of

Accident/Incident Fact Report N/A N/A

Accident/Incident Investigation Draft Report

(ADOT Independent) Submits Within 30 calendar days of completion

of investigation Comments Within 14 calendar days of receipt of draft report

Accident/Incident Investigation Final Report

(ADOT Independent) Submits Within 30 business days of receipt of

Sun Link’s comments Concurs Within 14 calendar days of receipt or alternative corrective action plan

Accident/Incident Correction Action Plan or Alternative

Corrective Action Plan Reviews and approves Within 10 calendar days of receipt Submits Within 10 days of receipt of ADOT

Final Report

80FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013



MINUTES




Sun Link Activity


2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

7. Three-Year On-Site Safety Review; Three Year On-Site Security Review

On-Site Review Notification Notifies N/A N/A N/A January

(180 days prior to on-site)

N/A N/A

On-Site Review Pre-Meeting and Request for Documentation

Plans and attends N/A N/A N/A May

(30 days prior review)

N/A N/A

Three-Year On-Site Safety Review; Three Year On-Site

Security Review Conducts N/A N/A N/A June N/A N/A

Three-Year On-Site Safety Review Draft Report; Three

Year On-Site Security Review Draft Report

Prepares N/A N/A N/A

September

(within 90 working days of

conclusion of review)

Comments N/A N/A N/A

Within 30 days of

receipt of draft report

Three-Year On-Site Safety Review CAPs; Three Year On-Site Security Review

CAPs

Reviews and approves N/A N/A N/A October Submits N/A N/A N/A

Within 30 days of

receipt of draft report

Three-Year On-Site Safety Review Final Report; Three

Year On-Site Security Review Final Report

Incorporate CAPs, revise and issue at conclusion of review N/A N/A N/A November N/A N/A

81FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013



MINUTES




Sun Link Activity


2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

Three Year On-Site Safety and Security Review Final Reports; FTA Annual

Submission

Submits to FTA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

8. Corrective Action Plans Corrective Action Program

Plan



Corrective Action Plan Reviews, approves, or rejects within 10 calendar days of receipt Submits Within 10 calendar days after need is identified

Corrective Action Plan (Revised) Reviews and approves within 10 calendar days of receipt Submits Within 30 calendar days of rejection

Corrective Action Monitoring Log Reviews Quarterly Submits Quarterly

9. FTA Reporting Annual Submission Submits to FTA March 15

Submit supporting documentation, if

required As requested by ADOT

Annual Certification (Electronic and Signed) Submits to FTA March 15 N/A N/A

Periodic Submissions of Accident/Incident, Hazard,

Correction Action Plans Submits to FTA As agreed with FTA N/A As requested by ADOT

82FTA

Quarterly R

eview • D

ecember 2013



MINUTES




Sun Link Activity


2014 2015 2016 2017 2014 2015 2016 2017

10. Safety and Security Certification Program

Safety and Security Certification Plan

(Project-Specific) Reviews and accepts N/A

As defined by the Project Master

Schedule N/A

Safety and Security Certification Verification Report (Project-Specific)

Reviews N/A Prior to initiation of project into revenue

service N/A

11. Training and Certification Program Staff Training Plan Reviews TBD As defined by

MAP-21 TBD

12. Transit Asset Management Plan

Transit Asset Management Plan Reviews and approves TBD As defined by

MAP-21 TBD

13. Engineering and Construction Phase Various Project Plans Reviews, approves or accepts, as

required As agreed with Sun Link Submits various project plans

As defined by the Project Master Schedule