33
Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy

Mesoscopic Group MeetingNovember 29, 2007

Page 2: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Scanning Probe Schematic

Page 3: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Scanning Probe Schematic

Scanner

Page 4: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Scanner

What makes the SPM work is the scanner, which is made out of a piezoelectric element

A piezoelectric is a material that extends or contracts when a voltage is applied to it

The reverse also applies: when a piezoelectric is deformed, a voltage is developed (this is the way a gas lighter works)

Page 5: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Piezoelectric materials and scanners

The extension or contraction of a piezoelectric element is small

For example, for a 5 cm long piezoelectric element, a voltage of 100 V will result in an extension of 1 micron

Since voltages can be controlled on the level of at least 10 mV, this gives a resolution of 0.1 nm or 1 Angstrom

One can put three of them together to form a scanner in three dimensions

Page 6: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Tube scanners

Another favorite design of the scanner is the tube scanner. In this geometry, the electrodes on the scanner are cut into four quadrants

Applying opposite voltages on two X or Y electrodes with to the inner electrode will bend the tube one way or the other. Applying the same voltage to all the 4 electrodes will extend or contract the tube in the Z direction Either tip or sample is attached to scanner

Page 7: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Scanning Probe Schematic

Coarse approach mechanism

Page 8: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Coarse Approach MechanismSince the scanner can move either tip or sample only by a few microns, we need a mechanism to bring the tip and sample within “striking distance” of each other.

The simplest coarse approach mechanism is a threaded mechanism of some type driven by a stepper motor

How small a step size can we achieve with this?

The smallest typical screw that one can buy readily has an 0-80 thread=80 threads per inch. A typical stepper motor will have about 200 steps per revolution

Resolution: 25.4 mm / 80 / 200 = 1.5 microns

With a finer resolution stepper (500 steps per revolution)

=0.6 microns

Page 9: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Coarse Approach Mechanism

Scan tube

Support Piezo Contact

Slowly extend piezo

Rapidly contract piezo

Apply a sawtooth waveform voltage to the piezo

Volt

age

time

slip

Can move in small steps (50 nm) and very rapidly

For finer control, one can use a “slip-stick” mechanism

Page 10: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Slip-stick Coarse Approach MechanismSome examples from the Mesoscopic Physics Lab

Page 11: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Coarse Approach Mechanism

Scan tube

Slip-stick mechanism can be very fickle--depends on frictionWalker mechanism (Pan design)

Scan tube

Scan tube

Scan tubeScan tube

Scan tube

Typically use 6 shear piezos--high voltage pulses need to be precisely timed

Page 12: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Coarse Approach MechanismModified Pan design (Anjan Gupta)Use a slotted scan tube

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 13: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Coarse Approach ProcedureIt is clear that one does not want to crash the tip into the sample, so we need to establish a procedure to get within “striking distance” of the sample. This is done as in the following flow diagram:

Use Z piezo to check for feedback

In feedback?

Yes

No Advance one step

Start scanning

Page 14: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Scanning Probe Schematic

Tip-sample interaction

Page 15: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Tip-sample interaction: TunnelingThe first scanning probe microscope to be invented was the scanning tunneling microscope, or STM. This depends on a tip-sample interaction that involves tunneling of electrons from the metallic tip to the substrate.

The tunneling current depends exponentially on the tip-substrate distance, making it a very sensitive instrument. It gives information not only about topography, but also about the spatial variation of the density of electrons. It can be used to image atoms and electron orbits.

However, a major drawback is that the sample substrate must be conducting, restricting its use.

I

Page 16: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Tip-sample interaction: Force microscopyThe force microscope was invented after the scanning tunneling microscope. The simplest force microscope depends on the van der Waal’s (or fluctuating dipole) attractive interaction between the tip and the sample

Force

distance

van der Waal’s interaction

Coulomb repulsion

Page 17: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Force microscopy: optical detectionIn a conventional cantilever AFM, the interaction between the tip and the surface results in a deflection of the cantilever holding the tip, or a change in the resonant frequency of the cantilever. This can be detected by many techniques, the most widely used in commercial systems being optical detection:

Lasermirror

4-quadrantphotodetector

The signal in the detector is used to keep the deflection or the resonant frequency of the cantilever constant by moving the z piezo

Page 18: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Contact mode AFMThe simplest mode of operation is contact mode AFM. In this mode, the tip is essentially placed in contact with the surface, and either the deflection of the cantilever or the movement in the z piezo required to keep the deflection is recorded as a function of the x-y displacement

Force

distance

van der Waal’s interaction

Coulomb repulsionForce constants of commercial cantilevers are typically 0.1 N/m. Hence a displacement of 1 nm corresponds to a force 0.1 nN

Page 19: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Non-contact mode AFMA more complicated technique of using AFM is non-contact AFM. In this mode, the cantilever is set into oscillation at its natural frequency, usually with another piezo. As the tip approaches the surface, the attractive force tip-sample force changes the frequency, amplitude and phase of oscillation. Any of these parameters can be used in the feedback circuit. Force

distance

van der Waal’s interaction

Coulomb repulsion

Page 20: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Tapping mode AFMContact mode AFM has high resolution, but wears out the tip, and may modify the surface especially if it is soft. Non contact mode does not have as good resolution. Intermittent contact or tapping mode AFM, where the tip touches the surface each half-cycle of an oscillation, has advantages of both.

Force

distance

van der Waal’s interaction

Coulomb repulsion

Page 21: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Force microscopy: tuning-fork transducersAnother favorite force transducer is a watch crystal, which is in the form of a quartz tuning fork. This has the advantage of being self-actuated and self-detected. The actuation is provided by applying a voltage (usually at a frequency corresponding to the resonant frequency of the tuning fork) and detection is accomplished by measuring the resulting current, which is proportional to the deflection.

V

I

Page 22: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

- Self actuating- Self sensing- No light- No alignment

- optical deflection - laser diode - photo diode - optical alignment- addition actuator

Quartz Crystal Tuning fork

Quartz Tuning Fork as a Force Sensor

Micro-machined Cantilever

Page 23: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Force sensitivity (Qf/k) 1/2

f ~ 10 - 100 kHzk ~ 0.01 - 100 N/mQ ~ 102 ~ 10 nm dithering

f ~ 32 - 100 kHzk ~ 103 - 105 N/mQ ~ 104 (106 in vacuum)< 1 nm dithering

Cantilever Tuning Fork

Force Sensitivity of Quartz Tuning Fork

• Low force sensitivity• Low thermal noise due to high stiffness• High resolution by small dithering amplitude

Page 24: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Force Sensitivity of Quartz Tuning Fork

Spring constant is given by

Where the Young’s modulus for quartz is given by E=7.87 x 1010 N/m^2

Force sensitivity is proportional to

Page 25: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Putting a tip on a tuning forkMost groups use thin etched wire tips

Todorovic and Schultz (1998)

Problem is that mass of wire loads tuning fork--changes quality factor and frequency

Page 26: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Putting a tip on a tuning forkOur group--use commercial cantilever tips

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Rozhok et al.

Page 27: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Putting a tip on a tuning forkOur group--use commercial cantilever tips

Rozhok et al.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 28: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Putting a tip on a tuning forkOur group--use commercial cantilever tips

Rozhok et al.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Surface of HOPGgraphite

Page 29: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Measurements using a tuning forkAs the tip is brought close to the surface, the amplitude, phase and frequency of the tuning force changes as a consequence of the force interaction with the surface

f = 32.768 KHz

k = 1300 N/m

Q = 1300

f = 32.768 KHz

k = 1300 N/m

Q = 1300

L = 2.2 mm, t = 190 m, w = 100 m

Page 30: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Damped forced harmonic oscillator

0

5

10

15

20

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

0/ω ω0/ω ω

( ) /A fω( )δ ω

10

2

2

0

Q

Q

Q

=

==

10

2

2

0

Q

Q

Q

=

==

/ 2π

π

On resonance, the response of the tuning fork is 90 degrees out of phase with the drive

Exploit this to self-excite the tuning fork

Page 31: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Lift-mode MFM

However, at short distances, it is difficult to separate the magnetic interactions from van der Waal’s interactions. Taking advantage of the fact that van der Waal’s interactions are short range while magnetic interactions are long range, one uses the “lift-mode” technique: take an image of the sample at short distances to obtain primarily topographic information, then use this information to keep the tip a fixed height above the sample, following the topography, and thereby obtain a (almost) purely magnetic image.

AFM and MFM images of an array of elliptical permalloy (ferromagnetic) particles

Page 32: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Other microscopies (a partial list)

Electrostatic force microscopy (EFM)Lateral force microscopy (LFM)Kelvin force microscopyScanning capacitance microscopy (SCM)Scanning gate microscopy Scanning SET microscopyScanning SQUID microscopyScanning thermal microscopyMagnetic resonance force microscopy (MRFM)Scanning Hall probe microscopyNear field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM)

Page 33: Tuning Fork Scanning Probe Microscopy Mesoscopic Group Meeting November 29, 2007

Other uses of scanned probe techniques

Lithography (electric field, DPN, atom-by-atom)Local voltage probesBiomolecular force detectionNanomanipulation……………………………….