19
Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall construction

Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall construction

Page 2: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

1930s build

Single skin brick wall

No insulation

Cold……draughty….

Decided to insulate

before moving in

External wall?

Internal wall?

Page 3: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Internal wall insulation

Pros:

Cheap(er), depending on

product used

Doesn’t affect the ‘look’ of the

house

Cons:

Less efficient insulation (more

thermal bridging)

Lose space internally

Disruptive/dusty

Additional work needed?

Move radiators & pipes

New (deeper) window sills

New/move skirting boards

Plug sockets

External wall insulation

Pros:

Don’t lose space internally

Better insulation

Less disruption

Cons:

Cost – more expensive

‘Step’ between adjoining

houses

Rendered finish, may require

planning permission (brick

house)

Additional work needed?

Extend gas flue; move satellite

dish, power cables, alarm box

etc

Retain brick detail e.g. through

brick slips

Page 4: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Before – Back bedroom

& stairs

Page 5: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

~ 100mm depth total

• Incl. ~80mm Kingspan

insulation

• 10mm of plasterboard

• 10mm gap/wood batons

for fixing

• Plaster

Page 6: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Baton

Gap

Kingspan

Plasterboard

Page 7: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Also had to insulate underside of the roof which formed part of ceiling

Page 8: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Before

After

Page 9: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

During

After

Page 10: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Before After

Page 11: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

All post insulation

Our house Neighbours

Page 12: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Suspended floor

Extension

Page 13: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Loft insulation

Note – pipe insulation

Additional ‘green’ improvements

Page 14: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Insulate under suspended floors

(drafts through floor boards & heat loss)

Kingspan

Page 15: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Increase the specification

of the double glazing

Page 16: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

New condensing boiler (this is the old one…)

Page 17: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

Green (sedum) roof on extension

Page 18: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal

- Slows down rain/water flow (reducing flooding) – esp if to soak-away

- Insulates and protects roof

- Intensive as you want – ours Seedum – just pull out saplings / feed 1/yr

- Looks good (textures, colours & flowers)

Page 19: Typical 1930’s housing stock, solid wall constructioncambridgecarbonfootprint.org/production/.../03/Kevin-Smith-Househo… · house Cons: Less efficient insulation (more thermal