3
Fw: MUST READ! re U.S. District Court Central District of CALIFORNIA- Case No. CV10-08185 ODW (FFMx) (JAVAHERI v. JP MORGAN) Dennis Dvorin ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Dennis Gray <[email protected]> To: Dennis gray <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 4:12 PM Subject: MUST READ! re U.S. District Court Central District of CALIFORNIA- Case No. CV10- 08185 ODW (FFMx) (JAVAHER To Me Jun 24, 2012 ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Dennis Gray <[email protected]> To: Dennis gray <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 4:12 PM Subject: MUST READ! re U.S. District Court Central District of CALIFORNIA- Case No. CV10-08185 ODW (FFMx) (JAVAHERI v. JP MORGAN) To All, See attached re U.S. District Court Case No. CV10-08185 ODW (FFMx): JAVAHERI v. JP MORGAN et al. From the decision: "JP MORGAN CHASE BANK's assertion that the P&A Agreement suffices to establish their ownership of the Note is no longer viable. Indeed, the P&A Agreement does not specifically identify Plaintiff's Note. The Court finds that Plaintiff has now sufficiently alleged that JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA did not own his Note and therefore did not have the right to foreclose." I downloaded some of the case filings from pacer.gov . The decision cites case law from the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Court, and CA state courts.

u s Bank Psa Does Not Provethey Own the Loan Chase California Case Javaheri Email From Dennis Gray

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

mortgage fraud psa does not create ownership of note

Citation preview

Fw: MUST READ! re U.S. District Court Central District of CALIFORNIA- Case No. CV10-08185 ODW (FFMx) (JAVAHERI v. JP MORGAN) Dennis Dvorin ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Dennis Gray To: Dennis gray Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 4:12 PM Subject: MUST READ! re U.S. District Court Central District of CALIFORNIA- Case No. CV10-08185 ODW (FFMx) (JAVAHER To Me Jun 24, 2012

----- Forwarded Message -----From: Dennis Gray To: Dennis gray Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 4:12 PMSubject: MUST READ! re U.S. District Court Central District of CALIFORNIA- Case No. CV10-08185 ODW (FFMx) (JAVAHERI v. JP MORGAN)

To All,See attached re U.S. District Court Case No. CV10-08185 ODW (FFMx): JAVAHERI v. JP MORGAN et al.

From the decision:"JP MORGAN CHASE BANK's assertion that the P&A Agreement suffices to establish their ownership of the Note is no longer viable. Indeed, the P&A Agreement does not specifically identify Plaintiff's Note. The Court finds that Plaintiff has now sufficiently alleged that JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA did not own his Note and therefore did not have the right to foreclose."

I downloaded some of the case filings from pacer.gov.The decision cites case law from the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Court, and CA state courts.

There are also a number of quotable statements/arguments included in the Plaintiff's memorandum of law.

FYI and reference.Be Blessed and do not let the Banksters intimidate you. Your note is your surety. and you are the one that gave it value. Also remember [17 CFR 240.15c 1-2] Fraud and misrepresentation and [18 USC 1957 ] Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity -- Blessings always

Dennis Gray(619) 571-7011 - (Cell)(760) 462-3806 - (Fax)

PUBLIC NOTICE

PRIVATE: This is Not A Public Communication!

This private email message, and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential information. To all public servants, including but not limited to Federal, State, or Local corporate government(s) : I accept your oath of office as your firm and binding contract between you and me, one of the People, whereby you have promised to serve, protect, and defend me, guarantee all of my unalienable rights, and defend the Constitution for the united States of America. Any/all political, private, or public entities, International, Federal, State, or Local corporate government(s) , private International Organization( s), Municipality( ies), Corporate agent(s), informant(s) , investigator( s) et. al., and/or third party(ies) working in collusion by monitoring My (this email) email(s), and any other means of communication without My express written permission are barred from any review, use, disclosure, or distribution. With explicit reservation of all My rights, without prejudice and without recourse to any of My rights. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or all intellectual property rights or reserved rights.