Upload
trinhnhan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 | P a g e
UCPO Strategy for successRising to the Challenge
ABSTRACTThe University Collaboration and Partnership Office is implementing an integrated strategy to enable the “best minds” to partner to achieve the Agency’s Mission
Vernon, Lynn R.
TABLE OF CONTENTSMission and vision............................................................................................3Principles and Values.......................................................................................4Strategic goals.................................................................................................5Strategy Metrics...............................................................................................8Strategy Challenges.........................................................................................9Partnership Engagement tools.......................................................................10Implementation Plan | Portfolio Management of actions................................11UCPO Strategy one pager..............................................................................17UCPO Alignment.............................................................................................18
2 | P a g e
MISSION AND VISIONMISSION
The University Collaboration and Partnership Office’s (UCPO) Mission is to be Lean, Agile, and Adaptive in enabling University partnerships for mission success.
VISION
The UCPO is to provide JSC a resource/path for accessing additional state-of-the-art knowledge, expertise, and resources provided by Universities partnerships and collaborations.
FOCUS
With a mission and vision focus the UCPO will help to enable the JSC 2.0 strategy by being agile, adaptive, and lean. The UCPO’s focus is to utilize University expertise helping to maximize resources available and planting the seed for a future need. The UCPO will work to provide opportunities and engagements that provide benefit in all phases of the Agency’s missions including research and development, pre-flight analysis and testing, and in-flight operations and problem analysis.
3 | P a g e
PRINCIPLES AND VALUESMISSION-ENABLING
We provide opportunities and strategies that bring the “best minds” together to enable problem solving and solutions development to enable the Agency mission.
PURPOSEFUL
We will support having a clear aim or purpose with actions and activities that are determined to provide the best customer support.
RESPONSIVE
We hold ourselves accountable for our actions. We strive to be responsive, to conduct ourselves with trustworthiness and respect for all.
PARTNER
We are great partners. We focus on adding value and creating mutually beneficial partnerships. The solutions to today’s great challenges require agile collaboration, teamwork and engagement with our stakeholders, both at JSC and in the national and international University research communities.
INTEGRATED
We will strive to integrate our activities and actions with the Agency Strategic Plan, the JSC Implementation Plan, and customer needs. We will work to provide insight into opportunities and methods that could be utilized/influenced to achieve the required goal.
4 | P a g e
STRATEGIC GOALSStrategic Goal 1: Research Capabilities
Strategic Goal 2: University Partnerships
5 | P a g e
The UCPO will provide research capabilities to meet unique Center needs while supporting the Agency’s Mission.
Performance Outcomes1. JSC Directorates are
utilizing Universities as partners for research and capabilities development and are a key part of the integrated roadmap discussions and focused on technologies at TRL 1 to 3
3-5 Year Objectives1. Implement seamless
approach to leverage University research capabilities
2. Promote partnerships to develop research opportunities that support JSC’s mission
3. Establish an University Consortium focused on Space Technology
4. Establish a University Advisory Council for JSC Research and Technology
Enable University Partnerships that provide access to the “best-minds” to support JSC’s mission.
Performance Outcomes1. Universities partnered
with on current technology challenges in operations similar to JPL’s utilization of UT Austin for spacecraft operations
3-5 Year Objectives
1. Utilize Advisory Council for access to technical experts, as required
Strategic Goal 3: Sustainability
Strategic Goal 4: Education Alignment
6 | P a g e
2. Capture and maintain an inventory of key technical experts aligned to JSC’s mission needs
Establish a fully integrated University engagement methodology and process.
Performance Outcomes1. The University engagement is
standardized, consolidated, cost effective, sustainable, and scalable providing services and capabilities to meet mission needs. University partnerships and collaboration are highly leveraged where additional resources are required.
3-5 Year Objectives1. Define and document clear
processes for University Research and Technology engagement
2. Integrate processes and communications with Universities, key stakeholders, functions, missions, and programs
3. Develop and implement key performance indicators and metrics for University engagements
Establish integration with Education program to provide alignment for JSC research needs
Performance Outcomes1. ,mThe University
engagement by JSC for Education and UCPO are integrated enabling cooperative and aligned activities that help to enable the goals of both strategies
3-5 Year Objectives
1. Provide Education communications and
7 | P a g e
information that is consistent with Center research needs
2. Utilize Education tools and processes to enable skills and resources’ to support JSC’s research and technology needs
8 | P a g e
STRATEGY CHALLENGES
This long-term strategy is faced with several challenges to achieve the overall goal. As part of the strategy the UCPO recognizes the challenges and will work to ensure the challenges are properly considered and addressed as part of the overall implementation of plan. These challenges may result in a change of process, goal, or success of this plan. Some of the identified challenges included, but are not limited to, the following with initial activities, communications, or methodologies to mitigate the challenge:
Culture – The NASA JSC culture for many years has been predominantly focused on operations. Utilization of current technology capabilities and direct contracts have been the primary methods of achieving the mission. Now with the shut-down of the Space Shuttle Program and the changing focus to farther reaching missions and the push for emerging technologies the NASA JSC culture needs to embrace more of a “research” focus and needs to evaluate new methods of accomplishing is goal.
Funding – The NASA budget is currently a flat budget, with minor increases, and with continuing inflation the budget is in fact declining as the cost of items and services increase. Limited funding is currently identified for research partnerships with Universities. NASA JSC needs to evaluate how to maximize its return on investment in areas identified in Partnerships Engagement Tools to align to the long-term technology needs resolving key gaps and challenges of the future.
Awareness – The variety of methods that can be utilized to engage with a University are extensive. Awareness of the methods, some or all, is very limited and typically only to those that have utilized them at one time or another. In addition, most professors are unaware of the various opportunities to engage with NASA. In addition many are overloaded with communications and will not typically pay attention to a communication unless it can directly impact them today. In order to improve this communications strategies need to be continuous and through. Integrating University Partnerships into the road map planning is an example of identifying the opportunities that is exist in research partnerships.
Resources – The University Collaboration and Partnership Office has very limited resources to fully engage the NASA JSC in a University Partnership program. Utilizing the resources within the organizations and within the groups that manage the various partnerships engagement tools is critical to success. However, this requires top level management to emphasis the need for alignment and integration.
10 | P a g e
PARTNERSHIP ENGAGEMENT TOOLSFollowing are some of the tools that can be utilized for partnership engagements with Universities. Each of these will either be through awareness, influence, discussions/partnership, or contracting. All can be utilized to help align to the Agency and Center needs and goals. The engagement tools include, but are not limited to:
Agreementso Space Act Agreements o CRADAo National Laboratory Agreements
International Agreementso SIERA
Flying Experiments on ISSo CASISo ISS University Program
Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA)o University to JSC
NASA pays salaryo JSC to University
Grants and Awardso Space Grants o Federal Government Awards and Grantso Space Technology Research Grants
NASA Space Technology Research Fellowships (NSTRF)
Early Career Faculty (ECF) Early Stage Innovations (ESI)
Game Changing Development Strategic University Research Partnerships (JPL) Innovative Partnerships Program Minority University Research and Education Program (MUREP) Unsolicited Proposals
o To NASAo NASA with Univ. to another Agency
Contractso UARC contract o GSFCo NAIS
NSBRI NASA Challenges (SOLVE)
11 | P a g e
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN | PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT OF ACTIONS
Goal 1: Research CapabilitiesObjective 1.1: Implement seamless approach to leverage University research capabilities
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
1.1.1:
Objective 1.2: Promote partnerships to develop research opportunities that support JSC’s mission
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
1.2.1: Benchmark current University partnerships utilized by JSC. Gather lesson’s learned, best practices, and strategies
FY15 3/16/15 2 months
Deputy UCPO No current reference model
1.2.2: Present overview of UCPO and how it can help organizations. (e.g SDP, EA, FOD, EISD, HH&P)
FY15 2/29/15 3 months
Director UCPO, Deputy UCPO
1.2.3: Facilitation of Org. (e.g. EA) visit/engagement with
FY15 3/1/15 4 months
Director UCPO
12 | P a g e
Universities
Objective 1.3: Establish an University Consortium focused on Space Technology
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
1.3.1: Benchmark current University Consortiums utilized by NASA. Gather lesson’s learned, best practices, and strategies. (HHP, JPL, ARC)
FY16 Deputy UCPO No current reference model
Objective 1.4: Establish a University Advisory Council for JSC Research and Technology
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
1.4.1:
13 | P a g e
Goal 2: University PartnershipsObjective 2.1: Utilize Advisory Council for access to technical experts, as required
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
2.1.1:
Objective 2.2: Capture and maintain an inventory of key technical experts aligned to JSC’s Mission Needs
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
2.2.1:
14 | P a g e
Goal 3: SustainabilityObjective 3.1: Define and document clear processes for University Research and Technology engagement
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
3.1.1: Perform benchmarking of existing engagement processes and gather lessons learned and tool info (e.g. HH&P, EA, JPL)
FY15 2/26/15 3 months
Deputy UCPO No current reference model
3.1.2: Establish a process for clearly identifying Center top priority needs for research that is utilized for guidance/coordination with Universities (e.g. CT Road Map integration)
FY15 2/1/15 2 months
Deputy UCPO, JSC Chief Technologist
3.1.3: Establish a process for capturing current research focus areas of US Universities and incorporate into a searchable dB (Supports Obj. 2.2.1)
FY15 6/1/15 4 months
Deputy UCPO
3.1.4: Develop an integrated process flow for UCPO engagements ensuring utilization of all potential engagement
FY15 6/1/15 5 months
Deputy UCPO Process and form implemented for UCPO engagement requests
15 | P a g e
tools. (Supports Obj. 1.1.1)
Objective 3.2: Integrate processes and communications with Universities, key stakeholders, functions, missions, and programs
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
3.2.1: Align yearly "challenge" categories for Texas Space Grant and EPSCoR to JSC primary gaps and needs
FY16 1 month
Objective 3.3: Develop and implement key performance indicators and metrics for University engagements
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
3.3.1: Develop document of historical utilization and benefit of JSC University engagements
FY15 3 months
16 | P a g e
Goal 4: Education AlignmentObjective 4.1: Provide Education communications and information that is consistent with Center research needs
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
4.1.1: Identify current education tools utilized that provide potential benefit from UCPO influence (e.g. Space Grants, etc.)
FY15 2/26/15 3 months
Deputy UCPO No current reference
4.1.2: Establish integration and process to provide recommendations for categories/projects.
FY15 2/26/15 5 months
Deputy UCPO One Space Grant project clearly aligned to a JSC Top priority goal
Objective 4.2: Utilize Education tools and processes to enable skills and resources to support JSC’s research and technology needs
Prioritized Actions Incorporated into Plan
Action Start Date
Duration
Owner(s) Baseline Key Metric to Track
4.2.1: Identify projects for interns to assist JSC's mission
FY15 4/1/15 5 months
Deputy UCPO Intern’s project success
18 | P a g e
22 | P a g e
Strategy 1.1: Exploit the ISS as a cornerstone of human
exploration
Strategy 1.2: Enable the commercialization of LEO
Strategy 1.3: Extend human exploration beyond LEO
Strategy 2.1: Lead int'l community participation in human space exploration
Strategy 2.2: Guide the development of Agency Global
Exploration Roadmap
Strategy 2.3: Champion int'l participation in development of
exploration capabilities
Strategy 3.1: Lead through innovative technical and business
management practices
Strategy 3.2: Lead by fully engaging the Human Spaceflight
team
Strategy 4.1: Intertwine JSC w/ partners to maximize economic
and societal impact
Strategy 4.2: Inform, educate, and engage all generations to advance human exploration
Strategy 4.3: Strategically communicate JSC’s relevance to
our stakeholders
Fund
ing
Sour
ce
Re
imbu
rsab
le
/ Non
-Re
imbu
rsab
le
SAA
Funding Gap: FY15 Partner Funding Amount
Funding Gap: FY16 -FY19 Partner Funding Amount
Prod
uct
Line
s (if
appl
icab
le)
De
scrip
tion
of T
echn
ical
W
ork
for
Part
ners
hip
Supp
ortin
g ta
sks /
acti
vitie
s / p
roje
cts
Exis
ting
Part
ners
hips
Part
ners
hip
Purs
uits
Esta
blish
inte
grati
on w
ith E
duca
tion
prog
ram
to p
rovi
de a
lignm
ent f
or JS
C Re
sear
ch n
eeds
Goa
l #1:
Lea
d Hu
man
Exp
lora
tion
Uni
vers
ity P
artn
ersh
ips
Sust
aina
bilit
y
Esta
blis
h an
Uni
veris
ty C
onso
rtium
focu
sed
on S
pace
Tec
hnol
ogy
Esta
blis
h a
Univ
ersi
ty A
dvis
ory
Coun
cil f
or JS
C Re
sear
ch a
nd
Tech
nolo
gy
Defin
e an
d do
cum
ent c
lear
pro
cess
es fo
r Uni
vers
ity R
esea
rch
and
Tech
nolo
gy e
ngag
emen
t
Prov
ide
Educ
ation
com
mun
icati
ons a
nd in
form
ation
that
is
cons
iste
nt w
ith C
ente
r res
earc
h ne
eds
Utiliz
e Ed
ucati
on to
ols a
nd p
roce
sses
to e
nabl
e sk
ills a
nd re
souc
ess
to su
ppor
t JSC
’s re
sear
ch a
nd te
chno
logy
nee
ds
Educ
ation
Alig
nmen
t
UCP
O Inte
grat
e pr
oces
ses a
nd co
mm
unic
ation
s with
Uni
vers
ities
, key
st
akeh
olde
rs, f
uncti
ons,
mis
sion
s, a
nd p
rogr
ams
Deve
lop
and
impl
emen
t key
per
form
ance
indi
cato
rs a
nd m
etric
s for
Un
iver
sity
eng
agem
ents
Goa
l #2:
Lea
d In
tern
ation
ally
Goa
l #3:
Exc
el in
Le
ader
ship
& M
gmt
G
oal #
4: E
xpan
d Re
leva
nce
to
Life
on
Eart
h
Rese
arch
Cap
abili
ties
Prov
ide
rese
arch
capa
biliti
es to
mee
t uni
que
Cent
er n
eeds
whi
le su
ppor
ting
Agen
cy M
issio
n
Enab
le U
nive
rsity
Par
tner
ship
s tha
t pro
vide
acc
ess t
o th
e “b
est-
min
ds” t
o su
ppor
t Miss
ion
Ope
ratio
ns
Esta
blish
a fu
lly in
tegr
ated
Uni
vers
ity e
ngag
emen
t met
hodo
logy
/pro
cess
Impl
emen
t sea
mle
ss a
ppro
ach
to le
vera
ge U
nive
rsity
rese
arch
ca
pabi
lities
Prom
ote
part
ners
hips
to d
evel
op re
sear
ch o
ppor
tuni
ties t
hat
supp
ort J
SC’s
mis
sion
Utiliz
e Ad
viso
ry C
ounc
il fo
r acc
ess t
o te
chni
cal e
xper
ts, a
s req
uire
dCa
ptur
e an
d m
aint
ain
an in
vent
ory
of k
ey te
chni
cal e
xper
ts a
ligne
d to
JSC’
s Mis
sion
nee
ds