Upload
bertha-garrett
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Udviklingsøkonomi - grundfag
Lecture 09
Two-sector dual-economy models
Lewis model with extensions by Ranis and Fei
Interplay between agriculture and industry
1
Basic premises here
Accepting the’modern’ capitalist society as the end goal
Development taken to = economic growth
Developemnt is tehrefore transformation from traditional to modern
Capital accumulation and savings the key to growth
Focus on the class of capitalist and entrepreneurs that invest and create the modern society
Clear rationale for development aid
2
Lewis 2-sector model of development with unlimited supply of labour
Capitalist-sector
”Modern sector, industry”
Use capital
Employes workers
Profit oriented (wage=MP)
W. Arthur Lewis, 1958
Subsistence-sector
”traditional sector, agriculture”
Does not use capital
Use family labour
Wage not equal to MP
Surplus labour
Due to rural surplus labour the capitalists can hire (unlimited) amount of labour at a wage equal to the subsistence wage plus a markup
3
Surplus production of food
Two central assumptions:
1. Traditional sector has surplus labour
2. Traditional sector pays the average product (income sharing)
Capitalists invest their profits. This increases the amount of capital in the formal sector and pushes upwards the marginal product curve
MP of rural labourAs surplus labour disappears,
the rural marginal product will increase
The Lewis model in Basu’s extensionAn alternative representation of
the Lewis modellen
w
Løn
og m
argi
nal p
rodu
kt
A1
L1
At the end (to the right of LT) , wages in both sectors increase together
LT0M 0R
MP of urban labour
Total labour force
Critique:
Is the entire profit invested?
Rural wages may stay low for a long time!
Neglect of agriculture – can it deliver the required food???
A2
B1 B2
L2
n
4
Labour force in traditionel/modern sector
Lewis model and policy
• Savings and investment – strengthen the capitalists
• Wage / income policy – modesty required
• Price policy – avoid interventions that damage industry
• Agricultural policy – neglect agriculture as long as there is surplus labour
• Industrial policy - provide support, for example through subsidies and trade protection
5
Discussion:
Distributional implications?
Who will demand indstrial goods?
Is labour really in ”surplus”?
6
Ranis-Fei
Lewis model overlooks the importance of agriculture
There is a risk of neglecting agriculture, becauseFalling agricultural
surplus: too little production
Terms of trade may change to the benefit of agriculture
(there are also distribution and poverty arguments for a rural focus)
3 phases
A surplus labour (MPL=0)
B Disguised unemployment, underemployment (MPL< W)
C Commercialisation of the ”traditional sector” (MPL= wage)
8
Intuition behind the Ranis-Fei model
After a while, as labour leaves agriculture: Food production will fall For a given food demand, and
assuming away imports, this will lead to
Declining terms of trade for industry
Rise in modern sector wage (w*) This slows down industrial growth
9
Ranis-Fei – discussion
When labour leaves agriculture, the rural average product (AVPL) will rise, so then why does the rural wage, w not increase?
Weakness of the model If the rural wage were to rise, this would be a problem for the
industrialisation scenario; would put upwards pressure on the industrial wage (w*) (also in phase A with surplus labour)
Solutions: either
1. Tax agriculture to reduce agricultural surplus and avoid rise in w, w*, or
2. Invest in agriculture, expand production to avoid the terms of trade go against industry
10
Policy discussion – rural versus urban
Example Rural growth in China Constant agricultural
problems in the Soviet
Is heavy taxation of the agricultural surplus a good idea?
Short run – it is good for industry
Long run Reduced investment in
agriculture Rural stagnation Industrial terms of trade is
worsened Worse prospects for
industrialisation
Conclusion: Stimulation of agriculture is required
How?
•Decent prices
•Investment
•Infrastructure
•New technologies