Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2/27/2015
1
Page 1
Understanding and Communicating Key Budget Variables
WASBO Accounting Conference March 12, 201512:45PM – 1:45PM
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated is providing this information to you for discussion purposes. The materials do not contemplate or relate to a future issuance of municipal securities. Baird is not recommending that you take any action, and this information is not intended to be regarded as “advice”’ within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the rules thereunder.
Page 2
Presenters
• 608‐562‐3700 (office)
New Lisbon School DistrictDennis Birr
Superintendent
• 608‐886‐8572 (cell)
Robert W. Baird & Co.Public FinanceDiane Pertzborn
School Business Specialist
• 715‐552‐3567 (office)
Robert W. Baird & Co.Public Finance
Debby SchufletowskiSchool Business Specialist
2/27/2015
2
Page 3
How to Communicate Key Variables
Know your material
Lay the foundation
Educate throughout the year
Adjust content and level of
detail to target audience
Flight Tower Passengers
Ground Control
Airplane Pilot
Page 4
Focus on Three Key Elements
Community Member
• What is the issue?
• Why it is important?
• How does it impact me?
Board Member
• What is the issue?
• Why is it important?
• How does it impact the district?
Administrative Team
• What is the issue?
• Why is it important?
• How does it impact the district and the district stakeholders?
2/27/2015
3
Page 5
Page 6
Revenue Limit
2/27/2015
4
Page 7
Revenue Limit—Why is it Important?
80.0%
20.0%
General Fund Operating Revenue
Revenue Limit Revenue All other operating revenue
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
The revenue limit is important as it generally comprises 85% ‐ 95% of a district’s general fund operating revenue.
Page 8
Revenue Limit
• Identifies how much revenue a district can generate through the sources of state equalization aid and the local tax levy for funds:
• Fund 10 (General Fund)
• Fund 38 (Non‐Referendum Debt)
• Fund 41 (Capital Expansion)
District Membership
Per Pupil $ (set in state
budget)Exemptions
Revenue Limit
Authority
Note: Fund 46 is funded through a transfer from the General Fund. Therefore, it is under the revenue limit, but, since it is not funded through a levy, it is not included in the list above.
2/27/2015
5
Page 9
Revenue Limit Per Member
$293$257
$297 $281
$213 $203
‐$544
$50$75 $75
$0 $0
‐$600
‐$500
‐$400
‐$300
‐$200
‐$100
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$7,500
$8,000
$8,500
$9,000
$9,500
$10,000
$10,500
2004‐05 2006‐07 2008‐09 2010‐11 2012‐13 2014‐15 2016‐17
Annual In
crease / Decrease
Maxim
um reven
ue / pupil
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
Current revenue limit per pupil increases are much lower than historical trends. For many districts, per‐pupil authority in 2014‐15 is below the 2010‐11 level. The final state biennial budget will determine the actual increase/decrease in 2015‐16 and 2016‐17.
Page 10
2014-15 Revenue Limit Max Revenue / Member
$9,262
$9,498
$9,797
$9,277
$9,712
$9,533
$9,228
$9,879
$9,227
$8,800 $9,000 $9,200 $9,400 $9,600 $9,800 $10,000
Baraboo
Reedsburg
Wisconsin Dells
Portage Community
Sauk Prairie
Lodi
Poynette
Mauston
Tomah Area
Max Revenue / Member
Each district has a unique maximum revenue / member amount based. Spending in 1993 and annual recurring exemptions impact districts’ maximum revenue/member figure.
Baird Budget Model GraphSource: Department of Public Instruction
2/27/2015
6
Page 11
Non-Revenue Limit Revenue
Page 12
Non-Revenue Limit Revenue
• Non‐Revenue Limit Revenue
• Open Enrollment
• Grant Revenue
• Categorical Aids
• Common School Fund Aid (Library Aid)
• SAGE (Student Achievement Guarantee in Education)
• Transportation Aid
• High Cost Transportation
• Sparsity Aid
• Other
2/27/2015
7
Page 13
Equalization Aid
Page 14
Revenue Limit Composition
56% 56%
5%
53%
45%
36%
53%
62% 61%
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Baraboo Reedsburg Wisconsin Dells PortageCommunity
Sauk Prairie Lodi Poynette Mauston Tomah Area
Millions
Revenue Limit Composition/ Aid as a % of Revenue Limit $
Equalization Aid Allowable Limited Revenue (Levy) Aid as a % of Rev. Limit Authority
Baird Budget Model GraphSource: Department of Public Instruction
District’s property wealth and shared costs per member will determine the % of revenue limit authority funded through state equalization aid.
2/27/2015
8
Page 15
Equalization Aid Components Local Variables
Property Wealth / FTE = Wealth per Member
Shared Costs / FTE = Shared Costs per Member
More Aid
• Property Poorer
Less Aid
• Property Richer
Page 16
Communicating Equalization Aid Local Variables
• Ongoing throughout the year
• Example:
• Decrease in Membership
• Decrease in Property Value
• Increase in Spending
• Positively Aided
• Negatively Aided
• Very high level for non‐board/admin
• State allocation will affect dollars available for all districts
• Other districts’ position in the aid formula can impact your district
2/27/2015
9
Page 17
Tax Levy
Page 18
Calculating the Revenue Limit Tax Levy
2/27/2015
10
Page 19
Total School Tax Levy
Page 20
Calculating the Tax Levy
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.Baird Budget Model Output
2/27/2015
11
Page 21
Communicating the Tax Levy
• Know the composition of your levy
• Research which fund is causing a change in the levy over the previous year
• Anticipate fluctuations, communicate and strategize
Page 22
Property Value
2/27/2015
12
Page 23
Importance and Interrelatedness Equalized Property Value
Page 24
Fluctuations in Valuations
Equalized Property Value
Municipality '12-'13 '13-'14 % change '14-'15 % change
T. Caledonia $1,104,114 $1,034,980 -6.26% $1,080,680 4.42%
% of district 0.07% 0.07% 0.07%
C. Baraboo $721,175,200 $716,398,200 -0.66% $722,958,100 0.92%
% of district 47.66% 47.60% 48.02%
T. Baraboo $186,939,800 $183,680,600 -1.74% $181,392,100 -1.25%
% of district 12.35% 12.21% 12.05%
T. Delton $198,192,288 $199,865,328 0.84% $198,078,982 -0.89%
% of district 13.10% 13.28% 13.16%
T. Excelsior $33,848,269 $31,497,859 -6.94% $31,469,213 -0.09%
% of district 2.24% 2.09% 2.09%
T. Fairfield $100,162,300 $101,183,700 1.02% $97,438,500 -3.70%
% of district 6.62% 6.72% 6.47%
T. Freedom $21,421,624 $21,310,053 -0.52% $21,097,231 -1.00%
% of district 1.42% 1.42% 1.40%
T. Greenfield $102,196,582 $103,137,588 0.92% $99,292,500 -3.73%
% of district 6.75% 6.85% 6.60%
T. Merrimac $26,379,351 $24,823,024 -5.90% $27,736,471 11.74%
% of district 1.74% 1.65% 1.84%
T. Sumpter $3,129,038 $2,851,301 -8.88% $2,794,120 -2.01%
% of district 0.21% 0.19% 0.19%
V. Lake Delton $1,545,829 $1,507,092 -2.51% $1,478,444 -1.90%
% of district 0.10% 0.10% 0.10%
V. North Freedom $22,018,300 $22,631,600 2.79% $22,037,800 -2.62%
% of district 1.46% 1.50% 1.46%
V. West Baraboo $95,117,400 $95,012,600 -0.11% $98,634,300 3.81%
% of district 6.29% 6.31% 6.55%
Total EQ Property Value $1,513,230,095 $1,504,933,925 -0.55% $1,505,488,441 0.04%
Baird Budget Model Output
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
2/27/2015
13
Page 25
Mill Rate
Page 26
What is the Mill Rate?
Total School‐Based Tax Levy
Equalized Property Value
(TIF OUT)1,000 Mill Rate
2/27/2015
14
Page 27
Communicating the Mill Rate
• Equalized Property Value not
Assessed Value
• Calculate district‐specific home
value ranges
• Changes in the Tax Levy and
Equalized Value will impact the
Mill Rate
$10.22 M
ill Rate
$10.22 M
ill Rate
$1,022$100,000 Home
$1,022$100,000 Home
$1,533
$150,000 Home
$1,533
$150,000 Home
$2,044
$200,000 Home
$2,044
$200,000 Home
Page 28
Mill Rate Comparison
$8.92
$10.29
$8.28
$9.98$10.49
$11.95
$9.39
$12.15
$8.51
$0.00
$2.00
$4.00
$6.00
$8.00
$10.00
$12.00
$14.00
Baraboo Reedsburg WisconsinDells
PortageCommunity
Sauk Prairie Lodi Poynette Mauston Tomah Area
Mill Rate
Baird Budget Model GraphSource: Department of Public Instruction
2/27/2015
15
Page 29
Property Values, Taxes and Mill Rate Trends
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
Page 30
Expenditure budgets
2/27/2015
16
Page 31
Why are Salary and Fringe Benefits Important?
71.4%
28.6%
General Fund Operating Expenditures
Salary/Fringe Benefit Budget All other operating expenditures
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
Salary and Fringe budgets are important as they typically comprise 70% ‐ 85% of a district’s general fund operating expenditures.
Page 32
Know your Data
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
Visual from Baird COMP Module
2/27/2015
17
Page 33
Non-Salary/Fringe Expenditures
• Non‐Salary/Fringe Expenditures
• Open Enrollment
• Utilities
• District Insurance
• Transfer to Fund 27 (which includes reimbursement for S/F benefits)
• Technology
• Curriculum
• Other
71.4%
28.6%
General Fund Operating Expenditures
Salary/Fringe Benefit Budget
All other operating expenditures
Page 34
Debt Service
2/27/2015
18
Page 35
Referendum vs. Non-Referendum Debt
• Fund 38• Inside Revenue Limit calculation• Debt issued without referendum approval• $1,000,000 maximum; additional borrowing authority possible
through petition process
Non-Referendum Debt
• Fund 39• Outside Revenue Limit Calculation• Debt issued with referendum approval
Referendum Approved Debt
• 10% of TID-IN Equalized Property Value for aided K-12 districts; 5% of TID-IN EQ Value for K-8, UHS and non-aided districts
Maximum Authority for Total District Debt
Page 36
• Included in
Equalization Aid
shared cost calculation
• Fund 38 and 39
impact the total
district tax levy
differently
• Provide opportunities
to manage the levy
• Energy
efficiency
exemption
Communicating Debt Service
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
Baird Budget Model Graph
'12‐ '13 '13‐ '14 '14‐ '15 '15‐ '16 '16‐ '17 '17‐ '18 '18‐ '19 '19‐ '20
NEW FUND 39 LEVY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FUND 39 LEVY $0 $0 $672,430 $671,975 $674,075 $671,025 $672,825 $354,256
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
Fund 39 CY Levy
2/27/2015
19
Page 37
Fund Balance
Page 38
Fund Balance
Liabilities Equity
PayablesST
Borrowing
Cash
Receivables
Fund Balance
Assets
2/27/2015
20
Page 39
Fund Balance ≠ Cash
The hypothetical example is for illustrative purposes only.
Page 40
2/27/2015
21
Page 41
Questions?