Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PD15GS001
Understanding by Design 2.0:
Designing Understanding-Based Curriculum
(Two-Day Institute)
Jay McTighe
January 20-21, 2015
Singapore, Singapore
DAILY SCHEDULE
Continental Breakfast (provided) 7:30 a.m.
Session Begins 8:30 a.m.
There will be a 15-minute coffee break between 10:00 and 10:30 a.m.
Lunch (provided) 11:30 a.m.
Session Continues 1:00 p.m.
There will be a 15-minute soda break between 2:00 and 2:30 p.m. Session Adjourns 3:30 p.m.
Copyright ©2015 by Jay McTighe. All rights reserved. This handout is intended for your personal use only. Further reproduction and dissemination, in whole or part, requires the permission of the various owners as credited herein. ASCD publications present a variety of viewpoints. The views expressed or implied in this publication are not necessarily official positions of ASCD.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 2
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Key Understandings about...
-- Understanding --
• A primary goal of education is the development and deepening of student understanding of important ideas and processes within, and across, disciplines so that they can transfer their earning to new situations.
• Content needs to be “unpacked” to identify the big ideas worth understanding and the essential questions worth uncovering.
• Evidence of student understanding is revealed when students apply (transfer) their learning within authentic contexts.
• Six facets of understanding – the capacity to explain, interpret, apply, shift perspec‑tive, empathize, and self-assess – serve as indicators that students understand.
• Understanding must be “earned” by the learner. Teaching for understanding facilitates “meaning making” by the students and equips them to successfully transfer their learning.
-- Design --
• Effective curriculum development reflects a three-stage design process called “backward design.” This process helps to insure that curriculum plans are well aligned and focused on desired learnings. Backward curriculum design also helps avoid the twin problems of “textbook coverage” and “activity-oriented” teaching.
• The backward design process can be productively applied to planning a single unit, a year-long course, and an entire K-12 curriculum.
• Regular reviews of curriculum and assessment designs, based on design standards, are needed for quality control to avoid the most common design mistakes and disappointing results.
• Educators can “work smarter” in curriculum design by working collaboratively and sharing ideas via electronic networks.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 3
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
A Summary of Key Research Findings Supporting Understanding by Design
• Views of how effective learning proceeds have shifted from the benefits of diligent drill and practice to focus on students’ understanding and application of knowledge.
• Experts’ knowledge is organized... Their knowledge is not simply a list of facts and formulas that are relevant to the domain; instead, their knowledge is organized around core concepts or ‘big ideas’ that guide their thinking about the domain (e.g., Newton’s second law of motion); it is “conditionalized” to specify the contexts in which it is applicable; it supports understanding and transfer (to other contexts) rather than only the ability to remember. Novices’ knowledge is much less likely to be organized around big ideas; they are more likely to approach problems by searching for correct formulas and pat answers that fit their everyday intuitions.
• Learning must be guided by generalized principles in order to be widely applicable. Knowledge learned at the level of rote memory rarely transfers; transfer most likely occurs when the learner knows and understands underlying principles that can be applied to problems in new contexts. Learning with understanding is more likely to promote transfer than simply memoriz‑ing information from a text or a lecture.
• Skills and knowledge must be extended beyond the narrow contexts in which they are initially learned. For example, knowing how to solve a math problem in school may not trans‑fer to solving math problems in other contexts. It is essential for a learner to develop a sense of when what has been learned can be used -- the conditions of application. Failure to transfer is often due to learners’ lack of this type of conditional knowledge.
• Curricula that are a “mile wide and an inch deep” run the risk of developing disconnected rather than connected knowledge. Research on expertise suggest that a superficial coverage of many topics in the domain may be a poor way to help students develop the competencies that will prepare them for future learning and work.” • Feedback is fundamental to learning, but feedback opportunities are often scarce in classrooms. Students may receive grades on tests and essays, but these are summative assess‑ments that occur at the end of projects. What are needed are formative assessments, which pro‑vide students with opportunities to revise and improve the quality of their thinking and understanding.
• Assessments must reflect the learning goals that define various environments. If the goal is to enhance understanding and applicability of knowledge, it is not sufficient to provide assess‑ments that focus primarily on memory for facts and formulas. Many assessments measure only propositional (factual) knowledge and never ask whether students know when, where, and why to use that knowledge. Given the goal of learning with understanding, assessments and feedback must focus on understanding, and not only on memory for procedures or facts.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 4
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Stage 2 – Assessment Evidence
Stage 1 – Desired Results
Stage 3 – Learning Plan
What “real-world” tasks will reveal students’ under-standing and proficiency? What transfer performan-ces should students be able to do well if they have met this standard?
What should students come to understand if they really learn this content well?
What should students eventually be able to do on their own if they can meet the Standard?
What important ques-tions are raised by this content?What essential ques-tions will guide inquiry into it?
What instruction is needed to equip students to meet this standard?What learning experiences will help learners acquire the knowledge and skills, make meaning of the impor-tant ideas and equip them to transfer their learning?
What evidence of learning is called for by the standard (and its indicators)?What assessments are needed?
Using Understanding by Design to Plan Curriculum
What big ideas and transfer goals are embedded in this Standard?
What factual knowledge must students acquire to meet the Standard?
What specific skills are stated or implied in the Standard? What proficiencies must students attain to meet the Standard?
What Standard(s) will the unit focus on? Given your reasons for teaching the unit, which Standard(s) are most relevant?
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 5
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why did you change the UbD Template?Just as computer software programs are regularly updated to incorporate new ideas and adjustments based on user feedback, the new Template reflects the most current thinking on UbD, based on our own observations and the constant feedback we get from users throughout the world. In particular, we have seen the need to highlight transfer goals and the coding of Stages 2 and 3 because too often well-intentioned designers were not focusing on long-term transfer in their units, and the unit assess‑ments often did not closely align with the stated goals of Stage 1.
2. Do you have to follow the UbD Template order (top to bottom) when you design?No. Backward design does not demand a rigid sequence. The process of thinking through a design is inherently non-linear, with various entry points, leading eventu‑ally to a logically-organized product. Regardless of approach, designers should rou‑tinely check the emerging design against the UbD Design Standards to ensure that the process yields a desired high-quality unit design.
3. Should you use the 3-stage UbD Template for planning lessons as well as units?We do not recommend isolated lesson planning separate from unit planning. We have chosen the unit as a focus for design because the key elements of UbD – understandings, essential questions, and transfer performances – are too complex and multi-faceted to be satisfactorily addressed within a single lesson. For instance, essential questions should be revisited over time, not answered by the end of a single class period.
Nonetheless, the larger unit goals provide the context in which individual lessons are planned. Teachers often report that careful attention to Stages 1 and 2 sharpens their lesson planning, resulting in more purposeful teaching and improved learning.
Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (2011) The Understanding by Design Guide to Creating High Quality Units. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
<http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/109107.aspx>
The Understanding by Design Template 2.0
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 6
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Acq
uisit
ion
of K
now
ledg
e &
Ski
ll
Esta
blish
ed G
oals
Mea
ning
Tran
sfer
Stud
ents
will
kno
w...
Stag
e 1
– D
esir
ed R
esul
ts
UN
DER
STA
ND
ING
SSt
uden
ts w
ill u
nder
stan
d th
at...
Stud
ents
will
be
able
to in
depe
nden
tly u
se th
eir l
earn
ing
to...
ESSE
NTI
AL
QU
ESTI
ON
SSt
uden
ts w
ill k
eep
cons
ider
ing.
..
UbD
Tem
plat
e 2.
0
Stud
ents
will
be
skill
ed a
t...
T1 d
rive
cour
teou
sly
and
defe
nsiv
ely
with
out a
ccid
ents
or n
eedl
ess r
isk.
T2 a
ntic
ipat
e an
d ad
apt t
heir
know
ledg
e of
safe
and
def
ensi
ve d
rivin
g to
va
rious
traf
fic, r
oad
and
wea
ther
con
ditio
ns. Q1
Wha
t mus
t I a
ntic
ipat
e an
d do
to
min
imiz
e ris
k an
d ac
cide
nts w
hen
I driv
e?
Q2
Wha
t mak
es a
cou
rteou
s and
def
ensi
ve
driv
er?
Nat
iona
l Dri
ver
Dev
elop
men
t Sta
ndar
ds
G1
Dem
onst
rate
a w
orki
ng
know
ledg
e of
rule
s, re
gu‑
latio
ns a
nd p
roce
dure
s of
oper
atin
g an
aut
omob
ile
G2
Use
vis
ual s
earc
h sk
ills t
o ob
tain
cor
rect
info
rmat
ion
and
mak
e re
duce
d-ris
k de
‑ci
sion
s for
effe
ctiv
e sp
eed
and
posi
tion
adju
stm
ents
G3
Inte
ract
with
oth
er u
s‑er
s with
in th
e H
ighw
ay
Tran
spor
tatio
n Sy
stem
by
adju
stin
g sp
eed,
spac
e, a
nd
com
mun
icat
ions
to a
void
co
nflic
ts a
nd re
duce
risk
G4
Dem
onst
rate
bal
ance
d ve
hicl
e m
ovem
ent t
hrou
gh
stee
ring,
bra
king
, and
ac‑
cele
ratin
g in
a p
reci
se a
nd
timel
y m
anne
r thr
ough
out
a va
riety
of a
dver
se c
ondi
‑tio
ns
Sour
ce:
Amer
ican
Dri
ver &
Tr
affic
Saf
ety
Asso
ciat
ion
S1 p
roce
dure
s of s
afe
driv
ing
unde
r
varie
d tra
ffic,
road
& w
eath
er
co
nditi
ons
S2 si
gnal
ling/
com
mun
icat
ing
inte
ntio
nsS3
qui
ck re
spon
se to
surp
rises
S4 p
aral
lel p
arki
ng
U1
A m
otor
veh
icle
can
bec
ome
a le
thal
wea
pon,
an
d dr
ivin
g on
e de
man
ds c
onst
ant a
ttent
ion.
U
2 D
efen
sive
driv
ing
assu
mes
that
oth
er
dr
iver
s are
not
atte
ntiv
e an
d th
at th
ey m
ight
m
ake
sudd
en o
r ill-
advi
sed
mov
es.
U3
Effe
ctiv
e dr
iver
s con
stan
tly a
dapt
to th
e va
ri‑ou
s tra
ffic,
road
, & w
eath
er c
ondi
tions
.
K1
the
driv
ing
law
s and
“ru
les o
f the
road
” fo
r the
ir st
ate,
pro
vinc
e or
cou
ntry
K2
mea
ning
of t
raffi
c si
gns a
nd si
gnal
sK
3 ba
sic
car f
eatu
res a
nd fu
nctio
nsK
4 w
hat t
o do
in c
ase
of a
n ac
cide
nt
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 7
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Eva
luat
ive
Cri
teri
aA
sses
smen
t Evi
denc
e
OTH
ER E
VID
ENC
E
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E TA
SK(S
)Stag
e 2
– Ev
iden
ceU
bD T
empl
ate
2.0
Cod
ing
1. T
ask:
driv
e fr
om h
ome
to sc
hool
and
bac
k, w
ith p
aren
tal a
nd te
ache
r su
perv
isio
n. T
he g
oal i
s to
dem
onst
rate
skill
ful,
resp
onsi
ve, a
nd d
efen
sive
dr
ivin
g un
der r
eal-w
orld
con
ditio
ns.
2. T
ask:
Sam
e ta
sk a
s #1
but w
ith ra
iny
cond
ition
s.
3. T
ask:
Sam
e ta
sk a
s #1
but w
ith ru
sh h
our t
raffi
c.
4. B
ookl
et: W
rite
a bo
okle
t for
oth
er y
oung
driv
ers o
n th
e bi
g id
eas o
f sa
fe a
nd e
ffect
ive
driv
ing
5. S
elf-
asse
ss y
our d
rivin
g an
d pa
rkin
g in
Tas
ks 1
- 3
in te
rms o
f co
urte
ous &
def
ensi
ve. D
iscu
ss a
djus
tmen
ts m
ade.
6. O
bser
vatio
n of
stud
ent d
river
in a
driv
ing
sim
ulto
r or c
ar o
ff ro
ad.
7. W
ritte
n te
st re
quire
d fo
r get
ting
a lic
ense
.
8. R
oad
test
requ
ired
for g
ettin
g a
licen
se.
• kn
ows t
he la
w•
driv
es w
ell
enou
gh to
m
eet d
rivin
g te
st c
riter
ia
• ac
cura
te•
perc
eptiv
e
• sk
illfu
l•
cour
teou
s/
defe
nsiv
e•
antic
ipat
es
wel
l•
resp
onsi
ve
• sk
illed
Tran
sfer
go
als
Mea
ning
G
oals
Skill
&
Tran
sfer
G
oals
Know
ledg
e &
Ski
ll G
oals
; si
mpl
e tr
ansf
er
Mea
ning
G
oals
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 8
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Stag
e 3
– Le
arni
ng P
lan
UbD
Tem
plat
e 2.
0
Cod
ing
LEA
RN
ING
EV
ENTS
Prog
ress
M
onito
ring
Pre-
asse
ssm
ent
Car
Che
ckC
ircle
sA
ntic
ipat
ion
& P
lann
ing
Ahe
adSa
fety
Che
cks
Pede
stria
n C
ross
ings
Use
of S
peed
Con
trols
& In
stru
men
tsH
ighw
ays
Oth
er T
raffi
cSt
artin
g up
, Mov
ing
and
Stop
ping
Turn
sIn
ters
ectio
nsSa
fe P
ositi
onin
gR
ever
sing
Dar
knes
sM
irror
sPa
rkin
gW
eath
er C
ondi
tions
Sign
als
Emer
genc
y St
oppi
ngR
ules
& L
aws
Secu
rity
Expe
rienc
e an
d eq
uipp
ing
via
dire
ct in
stru
ctio
n an
d vi
doe
sim
ulta
ors i
s pro
vide
d in
term
s of h
ow to
ha
ndle
: Wet
Roa
ds, D
ry R
oads
, Dar
knes
s Day
light
, Hig
hway
, City
, Cou
ntry
.
Sepa
rate
skill
dev
elop
men
t and
real
-wor
ld p
ract
ice
in –
All
inst
ruct
ion
is c
arrie
d ou
t and
form
ativ
ely
asse
ssed
und
er a
5-le
vel s
yste
m o
f inc
reas
ed a
uton
omy:
•
the
skill
is in
trodu
ced
• it
can
be c
arrie
d ou
t und
er fu
ll in
stru
ctio
n•
it ca
n be
car
ried
out c
orre
ctly
whe
n pr
ompt
ed•
it se
ldom
nee
ds to
be
prom
pted
• yo
u ca
n ca
rry
it ou
t con
sist
ently
with
out a
ny p
rom
ptin
g
Expe
rt dr
ivin
g is
mod
eled
via
vid
eo a
nd th
e dr
ivin
g in
stru
ctor
; the
driv
ing
exam
is in
trodu
ced
and
stud
ied.
Refl
ectio
n an
d ge
nera
lizat
ions
pro
mot
ed v
ia d
iscu
ssio
n of
the
esse
ntia
l que
stio
ns a
fter e
ach
virtu
al
and
real
road
exp
erie
nce.
Writ
ten
self-
asse
ssm
ent r
equi
red
afte
r eac
h dr
ivin
g ex
perie
nce.
Not
e: t
his
is a
mer
ely
sugg
esti
ve o
verv
iew
of
a un
it p
lan.
A
typi
cal u
nit
sum
mar
izes
all
lear
ning
eve
nts
in m
ore
deta
il.
Pre-
asse
ssm
ent o
f driv
ing
know
ledg
e, sk
ill, u
nder
stan
ding
s, an
d at
titud
es u
sing
surv
eys a
nd si
mul
ator
s.
Form
ativ
e as
sess
men
t an
d in
form
al fe
edba
ck
by in
stru
ctor
as s
tude
nt
tries
to a
pply
skill
s le
arne
d w
hile
driv
ing
off-
road
• Lo
ok fo
r suc
h co
m‑
mon
mis
conc
eptio
ns
and
skill
defi
cits
as -
* fa
ilure
to c
heck
m
irror
s and
per
iph‑
eral
vis
ion
* no
t acc
urat
ely
resp
ondi
ng d
urin
g ch
ange
s in
road
co
nditi
ons
* no
t per
ceiv
ing
spee
d of
onc
omin
g ca
rs d
urin
g m
erge
s an
d tu
rns
T A M A, T
Code
Key
: T
= tr
ansf
er,
M =
Mea
ning
-mak
ing,
A =
Acq
uisi
tion
A, T
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 9
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Acq
uisit
ion
of K
now
ledg
e &
Ski
ll
Esta
blish
ed G
oals
Mea
ning
Tran
sfer
Stud
ents
will
kno
w...
Stag
e 1
– D
esir
ed R
esul
ts
UN
DER
STA
ND
ING
SSt
uden
ts w
ill u
nder
stan
d th
at...
Stud
ents
will
be
able
to in
depe
nden
tly u
se th
eir l
earn
ing
to...
ESSE
NTI
AL
QU
ESTI
ON
SSt
uden
ts w
ill k
eep
cons
ider
ing.
..
UbD
Tem
plat
e 2.
0
Stud
ents
will
be
skill
ed a
t...
Wha
t spe
cific
ally
do
you
wan
t st
uden
ts to
und
erst
and?
Wha
t inf
eren
ces
shou
ld th
ey m
ake?
Wha
t tho
ught
-pro
voki
ng q
uest
ions
w
ill fo
ster
inqu
iry,
mea
ning
mak
ing,
an
d tr
ansf
er?
Wha
t kin
ds o
f lon
g-te
rm, i
ndep
ende
nt a
ccom
plis
hmen
ts a
re d
esir
ed?
Wha
t Con
tent
Sta
ndar
ds,
Prog
ram
and
/or M
issi
on
rela
ted
goal
(s) w
ill th
is
unit
add
ress
?
Wha
t fac
ts a
nd b
asic
con
cept
s sh
ould
stu
dent
s kn
ow a
nd b
e ab
le
to re
call?
Wha
t dis
cret
e sk
ills
and
proc
esse
s sh
ould
stu
dent
s be
abl
e to
use
?
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 10
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Eva
luat
ive
Cri
teri
aA
sses
smen
t Evi
denc
e
OTH
ER E
VID
ENC
E
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E TA
SK(S
)Stag
e 2
– Ev
iden
ceU
bD T
empl
ate
2.0
Cod
ing
How
will
stu
dent
s de
mon
stra
te th
eir u
nder
stan
ding
(mea
ning
-m
akin
g an
d tr
ansf
er) t
hrou
gh c
ompl
ex p
erfo
rman
ce?
Wha
t cri
teri
a w
ill b
e us
ed in
ea
ch
as
sess
men
t to
eva
luat
e at
tain
men
t of
the
Des
ired
Re
sult
s?
Rega
rdle
ss
of th
e form
at
of th
e as
sess
-m
ent,
wha
t qu
alit
ies
are
mos
t im
port
ant?
Wha
t oth
er e
vide
nce
will
you
col
lect
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er S
tage
1 g
oals
wer
e ac
hiev
ed?
Are
all
of th
e D
esir
ed
Resu
lts
bein
g ap
-pr
opri
-at
ely
as-
sess
ed?
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 11
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Stag
e 3
– Le
arni
ng P
lan
UbD
Tem
plat
e 2.
0
Cod
ing
LEA
RN
ING
EV
ENTS
Prog
ress
M
onito
ring
Pre-
asse
ssm
ent
Whi
le d
etai
led
less
on p
lans
are
not
exp
ecte
d he
re,
you
shou
ld i
nclu
de
suffi
cien
t in
form
atio
n so
tha
t an
othe
r te
ache
r w
ho i
s fa
mil
iar
wit
h th
e un
it’s
con
tent
cou
ld u
nder
stan
d an
d fo
llow
the
bas
ic le
arni
ng p
lan.
Tha
t m
eans
not
jus
t st
atin
g W
HAT
lear
ners
wil
l do
but
WH
Y t
he e
vent
is
prop
osed
-
its
purp
ose
Opt
iona
l: U
se t
he c
olum
n on
the
left
to
code
you
r le
arni
ng a
ctiv
itie
s; e
.g.,
th
eir
alig
nmen
t w
ith
Stag
e 1
elem
ents
, T-
M-A
, or
W.H
.E.R
.E.T
.O.
Are
all
thre
e ty
pes
of g
oals
(acq
uisi
tion
, mea
ning
, and
tran
sfer
) ad
dres
sed
in th
e le
arni
ng p
lan?
Doe
s th
e le
arni
ng p
lan
refle
ct p
rinc
iple
s of
lear
ning
an
d be
st p
ract
ices
?
Is th
ere
tigh
t alig
nmen
t acr
oss
all t
hree
sta
ges?
Wha
t pre
-ass
essm
ents
will
you
use
to c
heck
stu
dent
s’ pr
ior
know
ledg
e, s
kill
leve
ls a
nd p
oten
tial
mis
conc
epti
ons?
How
will
you
m
onit
or s
tude
nts’
prog
ress
tow
ards
ac
quis
itio
n, m
ean-
ing-
mak
ing,
and
tr
ansf
er, d
urin
g le
sson
eve
nts?
Wha
t are
pot
enti
al
roug
h sp
ots
and
stud
ent m
isun
der-
stan
ding
s?
How
will
stu
dent
s ge
t the
feed
back
th
ey n
eed
and
oppo
rtun
itie
s to
m
ake
use
of it
?
Wha
t’s
the
goal
fo
r (or
ty
pe
of)
each
ev
ent?
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 12
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Key: 3 = meets the standard 2 = partially meets the standard 1 = does not yet meet the standard
Stage 1 3 2 1 Feedback & Guidance1. The listed Transfer Goals specify desired long-term, genuine accomplishment. (T) 2. The identified Understandings reflect important, transferable ideas. (U)3. The identified Understandings are stated as full-sentence gener‑alizations – Students will understand that.... (U)4. Essential Questions are open-ended and thought provoking. (Q)5. Relevant Standards, Mission, and/or Program Goals (G) are ad‑dressed explicitly in all 3 Stages.6. The identified knowledge (K) and skill (S) are needed to ad‑dress the established goals, achieve the targeted understanding(s), and support effective transfer.7. All the elements – T, U, Q, G, K, S – are aligned so that Stage 1 is focused and coherent. Stage 28. The specified assessments provide valid evidence of all desired results; i.e., Stage 2 aligns with Stage 1.9. The specified assessments include authentic transfer tasks based on one or more facets of understanding.10. The specified assessments provide sufficient opportunities for students to reveal their attainment of the Stage 1 goals.11. Evaluative criteria for each assessment are aligned to Desired Results. Stage 312. Appropriate learning events and instruction will help learners: a. Acquire targeted knowledge and skills. b. Make meaning of important ideas. c. Transfer their learning to new situations.13. The W.H.E.R.E.T.O. elements are included so that the unit is likely to be engaging and effective for all learners. Overall14. All 3 stages are coherent and in alignment.15. The unit design is feasible and appropriate for this situation.
UbD Unit Design Standards 2.0
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 13
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
TRANSFER GOALS
Definition Transfer Goals highlight the effective uses of understanding, knowledge, and skill that we seek in the long run; i.e., what we want students to be able to do when they confront new challenges – both in and outside of school. There are a small number of overarching, long-term transfer goals in each subject area. For example, a long-term aim in mathematics is for students to be able to solve “real world” problems on their own. For example, a long-term transfer goal in history is for students to apply the lessons of history when considering contemporary issues. In every case, the ability to transfer learning manifests itself in not just one set‑ting but in varied situations. Transfer is about independent performance in context. You can only be said to have fully understood if you can apply your learning without someone telling you what to do and when to do it. In the real world, no teacher is there to direct and remind you about which lesson to plug in here or there. Transfer is about intelligently and effectively drawing from your repertoire, independently, to handle new contexts on your own. In the real world, no teacher is there to direct and remind you about which lesson to plug in here or there: transfer is about intelligently and effectively drawing from your repertoire, independently, to handle particular contexts on your own. The goal of transfer thus requires that an instructional plan (in Stage 3) help the student to become increasingly autonomous, and the assessments (in Stage 2) need to determine the degree of student autonomy.
Transfer goals have several distinguishing characteristics: • They are long-term in nature; i.e., they develop and deepen over time. • They are performance based; i.e., require application (not simply recall). • The application occurs in new situations, not ones previously taught or encountered; i.e., the task cannot be accomplished as a result of rote learning. • The transfer requires a thoughtful assessment of which prior learning applies here; i.e., some strategic thinking is required (not simply “plugging in” skill and facts). • The learners must apply their learning autonomously on their own, without coaching or excessive hand-holding by a teacher). • Transfer calls for the use of habits of mind; i.e., good judgment, self regulation, persistence along with academic understanding, knowledge and skill.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 14
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Long Term Transfer Goalsexamples
Students will be able to independently use their learning to:
History • Use knowledge of patterns of history to better understand the present and prepare for the future.• Critically appraise historical claims and analyze contemporary issues.• Participate as an active and civil citizen in a democratic society.
Health and Physical Education • Make healthful choices and decisions regarding diet, exercise, stress management, alcohol/drug use throughout one’s life.• Play a chosen game skillfully and with good sportsmanship. Mathematics• Make sense of never-before-seen, “messy”problems and persevere in solving them.• Construct viable arguments involving mathematics and statistics and critique the reasoning of others.
Performing & Fine Arts • Find at least one arts discipline in which they develop sufficient competence to continue active involvement in creating, performing, and responding to art as an adult.• Respond by analyzing and interpreting the artistic communications of others.
Reading• Read and respond to text in various genres (literature, non-fiction, technical) for various purposes (entertainment, to be informed, to perform a task).• Comprehend text by inferring and tracing the main idea, interpreting (“between the lines”), critically appraising, and making personal connections.
Research• Locate pertinent information from varied sources (print, on-line; primary, secondary).• Critically evaluate sources and information (e.g., for accuracy, completeness, timeliness, lack of bias, properly referenced).
Science • Evaluate scientific claims and analyze current issues involving science or technology. • Conduct a sound investigation to answer an empirical question.
World Language• Effectively communicate with varied audiences and for varied purposes while displaying appropriate cultural understanding.
Writing• Write in various genres for various audiences in order to explain (expository), entertain (narrative/poem), argue (persuasive), guide (technical), and challenge (satirical).• Carefully draft, write, edit, and polish one’s own and others’ writing to make it publishable.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 15
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Transfer Goals examples from schools and districts
Science Transfer GoalsStudents will be able to independently use their learning to:
• Apply knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public discussions on relevant issues in a changing world.• Conduct investigations, individually and collaboratively, to answer questions.• Evaluate scientific claims for validity.• Think systemically.
Source: North Slope Borough School District, Barrow, Alaska (July 2012)
Visual Arts Transfer GoalsStudents will be able to independently use their learning to:
• Create engaging and purposeful artistic expressions in forms that vary in terms of media and style. • Communicate ideas, experiences, and stories through art. • Respond to the artistic expression of others through global understanding, critical stance, personal connection, and interpretation. • Respond to technical and conceptual challenges of his/her own. • Develop an independent artistic vision.
Source: Sheridan School, Washington, DC (June 2011)
World Languages Transfer Goals Students will be able to independently use their learning to:
• Communicate effectively in the target language(s) in realistic situations while displaying a sensitivity to culture and context. • Emulate native speakers.• Willingly taking risks with language, both within and outside of the classroom.
Source: The Dalton School, New York, NY (March 2012)
Special Education Students will be able to independently use their learning to:
• Function in the community while respecting social/cultural norms.• Advocate for their personal needs – academic, behavioral, emotional, and physical. • Communicate effectively based on purpose, task, and audience using appropriate vocabulary.• Explore and pursue viable options based on aspirations, interests, and experience.
Source: Prosper ISD, TX (April 2013)
© Wiggins & McTighe 2012 page 16
Unpacking Standards Worksheets
Stated/implied performances in VERBS:Stated/implied “big ideas” in NOUNS:
Unpacking Standards - “Inside Out” Method
STANDARD
Understandings
Essential Questions
Transfer Goal(s)
Performance Task(s)
ADJECTIVES and ADVERBS:
Criteria
• arguments • claims• topics or texts• evidence • reasoning
• write • support (claims)• analyze (topics/texts)• reasoning
• valid• relevant• sufficient
• relevant evidence• sufficient evidence• valid reasoning
Based on your reading of informational texts on a local or national issue, prepare a (report, letter to editor, essay) for a specific audience to convince them of your position. Your argument should follow a logical sequence with supporting evidence for your position (claim).
• What makes an argument convincing? • What is the best evidence I can use to support my argument? • How do I best organize and present my argument?
• The effectiveness of an argument is dependent upon the quality of the supporting evidence used (validity, appropriateness) and how it is con-veyed.
produce clear and coherent writing to persuade a target audience
Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
© Wiggins & McTighe 2012 page 17
Unpacking Standards Worksheets
Stated/implied performances in VERBS:Stated/implied “big ideas” in NOUNS:
Unpacking Standards - “Inside Out” Method
STANDARD
Understandings
Essential Questions
Transfer Goal(s)
Performance Task(s)
ADJECTIVES and ADVERBS:
Criteria
• Write for the same purpose to different audiences, and explain the influence of the target audience on thestyle, word choice, etc.• Write on the same content in two different genres and explain each genre’s influence on organization, style, word choice.
• A writer’s purpose (e.g., to inform, entertain, persuade, etc.) and audienceshapes the style, development and organization of the writing.• Different writing genres and purposes have unique organizational patterns.
• clear • coherent• appropriate to task, purpose, audience
• development • organization • style • task • audience • purpose (“form follows function”)
• What is my goal? For whom am I writing? • How does purpose and audience affect a writer’s style and organization? • How do effective writers hook and hold their readers in different genres (e.g., mystery, essay, poem, historical fiction)?
• clear • coherent• appropriate
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
Produce (writing)
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organiza-tion, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
Source: Common Core – College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards – Writing
© Wiggins & McTighe 2012 page 18
Unpacking Standards Worksheets
Stated/implied performances in VERBS:Stated/implied “big ideas” in NOUNS:
Unpacking Standards - “Inside Out” Method
STANDARD
Understandings
Essential Questions
Transfer Goal(s)
Performance Task(s)
ADJECTIVES and ADVERBS:
Criteria
Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze theirdevelopment; summarize the key supporting details and ideas.
• ideas • development • themes • details• text
• determine• analyze• summarize
• Authors do not always state thecentral idea or theme overtly; readers have to infer it “between the lines.”• Effective readers use specific strate-gies to help them infer the impliedmain ideas of a text.
• How can I to determine the centralidea or theme of what I read?• How can I read “between the lines”to determine the author’s meaning?• What strategies do effective read-ers use to make meaning from a text?
• Prepare a “study guide” for studentsby summarizing the central ideas orkey themes of a text.• Use the “Adding up the Facts” orga-nizer to show how supporting detailslead to an inference about main ideas.
• appropriate inference• effective summary• supported by key details
Determine central ideas or themes ofa text and analyze their develop-ment. Summarize the key supporting details
• central• key•supporting
© Wiggins & McTighe 2012 page 19
Unpacking Standards Worksheets
Stated/implied performances in VERBS:Stated/implied “big ideas” in NOUNS:
Unpacking Standards - “Inside Out” Method
STANDARD
Understandings
Essential Questions
Transfer Goal(s)
Performance Task(s)
ADJECTIVES and ADVERBS:
Criteria
• mathematical model(s)• “real life” problems• disciplines and life
• How can I best model this phenomena in this situation?• Do these results make sense?• What are the limits of this mathematical model in this context?• What do effective problem solvers do?
• Mathematical models simplify and connect phenomena to assist in under-
standing and problem solving. • Mathematical models must be viewed
critically so that they do not mislead. •Effective problem solvers always check
for the reasonableness of solutions.
• Create a mathematical model for a selected “real-world” situation (e.g., seasonal temperatures).• Critically review and improve a mathematical model for its appropri-ateness to a given situation.
• model • apply• solve
Apply the mathematics they know to develop mathematical models for solving real world problems
• appropriate modeling• accurate• reasonableness of solution
Model with Mathematics Mathematically proficient students can apply the mathematics they know to solve problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace....routinely interpret their mathemati-cal results in the context of the situation and reflect on whether the results make sense, possibly improving the model if it has not served its purpose.
• interpret • reflect on• improve
© Wiggins & McTighe 2012 page 20
Unpacking Standards Worksheets
Stated/implied performances in VERBS:Stated/implied “big ideas” in NOUNS:
Unpacking Standards - “Inside Out” Method
STANDARD
Understandings
Essential Questions
Transfer Goal(s)
Performance Task(s)
ADJECTIVES and ADVERBS:
Criteria
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 21
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
The facets of understanding provide indicators of understanding and thus can be used to select or develop assessments.
If someone really understands something, they can...
Explanation
Inte
rpre
tatio
n
Pers
pect
ive
Self-Knowledge
The Facets of Understanding
Empathy
• Explain it in their own words.•Represent it in a different form.
•Teach it to someone else.•Make and support an
inference.
• Make meaning from a text or data set.• See and describe patterns.• Make new connections.
• Use their learning effectivelyin a new situation.• Transfer.
• Get “inside” another person’s feelings and world view.• Recognize merit in the odd, unorthodox, or unfamiliar.
• Realize their strengths and weaknesses.
• Recognize the limits of their own understanding.
• Reflect on their learning and actions.
• Recognize different points of view. • See the “big picture.”• Take a critical stance.
Facets of Understanding
Application
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 22
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Performance tasks can be used as rich learning activities or as assessments. They ask students to apply knowledge and skills to a new situation, and typically yield tangible products and performances that serve as evidence of learning. Performance tasks (as distinct from long-term projects) can usually be completed within a relatively short time frame, generally between one and four class periods. Here are general characteristics of performance tasks; they: • demand thoughtful application of knowledge and skills, not just recall; • yield tangible products and performances that serve as evidence of learning; • establish authentic contexts for performance; • can integrate two or more subjects as well as 21st century skills (e.g., critical thinking, technology use, teamwork); • do not have a “single, best” answer or one, “right way” to accomplish the task; • evaluate performance with established criteria and rubrics; and • may be used as rich learning activities and/or assessments. Performance tasks may be content-specific (e.g., mathematics, science, social studies) or integrated (i.e., involving two or more subjects). One natural interdisciplinary connection is to include a reading, research and/or communication (writing, graphics, presentation) component to tasks in content areas. Such tasks encourage students to see meaningful learning as integrated, rather than something which occurs in isolated segments. Two examples of performance tasks are provided below.
Fairy Tales [grades 3‑4]
You have just finished reading three fairy tales that all have the same general pattern – characters overcoming a confrontation with an animal when the animal’s intent is to harm the character(s). Your task is to write a story that includes all the characteristics of a fairy tale and also uses this same general pattern. You will then read your story to your kindergarten reading buddy and teach him/her about the characteristics and general pattern of a fairy tale. Source: Assessing Outcomes: Performance Assessment Using Dimensions of Learning
City Park [high school physics]
Your design team has been asked by the City Park Department to construct a model for a new playground near the elementary school. The playground will have swing sets and see-saws. For the safety of the children who will be using the playground equipment, you must design your swings so that they don’t swing too fast or “loop-the-loop “ over the top of the swing set. Design and conduct an experiment to determine how the variables - length, mass, height of release - affect the rate of back-and-forth movement of a swing. Be prepared to present your find‑ings, recommendations, and a demonstration to the City Park officials. Source: A Tool Kit for Professional Developers: Alternative Assessment
Performance Tasks
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 23
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Performance Task ExamplesExamine the performance task vignettes on the following pages. What distinguishes these tasks from typical test “items”? What common features or characteristics do these share?
Painting a Schoolroom – (Mathematics, grades 7-9) When contractors give us an estimate on repairs, how can we know if the cost is reasonable? You have been asked by the Principal to review a painting contractor’s proposal to determine whether s/he is being overcharged. (Students are given room dimensions and cost figures for materials, labor, and a 20% profit. ) Examine the proposal and write a letter to the Principal providing your evaluation of the proposal. Be sure to show your calculations so that s/he will understand how you arrived at your conclusion.
Mail-Order Friend – (Language Arts, grades K-2) Imagine that you have an opportunity to “order” a friend by telephone from a mail-order catalog. Think about the qualities that you want in a friend. Before you “order” your friend over the telephone, practice asking for three characteristics that you want in a friend and give an example of each characteristic. Remember to speak clearly and loud enough so that the sales person will know exactly what to send.
From the Mountains to the Seashore – (History, Geography, Math, grades 5-8) A group of nine foreign students is visiting your school for one month as part of an international exchange program. (Don’t worry, they speak English!) The principal has asked your class to plan and budget a four-day tour of Massachusetts to help the visitors understand the state’s impact on the history and development of our nation. Plan your tour so that the visitors are shown sites that best capture the ways that MA has influenced our nation’s development. You should prepare a written tour itinerary, including an explanation of why each site was selected. Include a map tracing the route for the four-day tour and a budget for the trip.
Spot Remover – (Science, middle school) Chris wants to decide which of two spot removers is best. First, he tried Spot Remover A on a T-shirt that had fruit stains and chocolate stains. Next, he he tried Spot Remover B on jeans that had grass stains and rust stains. Then he compared the results. Explain what did Chris do wrong that will make it hard for him to know which spot remover is best. Redesign the experiment to help him determine the best spot remover.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 24
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Performance Task Examples
Hall of Recognition – (Social Studies, Language Arts, grade 4-5) The state has announced the establishment of a Hall of Recognition to honor the con‑tributions of local citizens to their community, the state or the nation. Since you are learn‑ing about famous individuals from _____, you have been asked to nominate a candidate who you believe would be worthy of admission to the Hall. Your task is to select and research the life of your chosen individual. Submit a nomi‑nation letter to the Hall’s selection committee explaining the reasons why your candidate should be included Hall of Recognition. Be sure to describe his/her accomplishments and the contributions they he/she has made.
We Salute You - (Language Arts, Social Studies, grades 1-4) Our room mother, Mrs. ________, has done many things to help us throughout the year. When people do things for you, it is important to show appreciation. We will each be writing a letter to her to thank her and let her know how she has helped our class. Your letter should include all the parts of a friendly letter. Be sure to tell Mrs. ________ at least three ways she has been helpful to our class. Include at least one thing that you especially appreciate about Mrs. ________.
Chemical Equilibrium – (Chemistry, grades 11 - 12) You are a researcher hired by a group of expert mountain climbers. Hypoxia is the set of symptoms (headache, fatigue, nausea) that comes from a lack of oxygen in body tis‑sues. It is often felt by mountain climbers as they ascend altitude quickly. Sherpas, long-time residents of high altitudes, seem to feel no hypoxic discomfort. Why might that be? Your group wants to know, and to benefit from the knowledge. Design a series of experiments that would test the difference in hypoxic symptoms between mountain climbers and sherpas. Explain, using chemical equilibrium, why high altitude causes hypoxia in the climbers. How can sherpas avoid these symptoms? How can you test for these possibilities? What would a positive test look like? What inherent errors would you have to be aware of?
Tour Director – (World Languages - Level 1) You serve on a Welcome Committee to provide tours for new students. Plan a trip to three places (e.g., school, town, mall) in the new student’s target language. Incorporate the following vocabulary: directions (left, right, near, far, next to, etc.), places (e.g., class‑rooms, cafeteria, gym, library, labs, churches, police and fire stations, schools, restau‑rants, stores) and transportation (e.g., bus, bike, stairs, escalators, taxi, train, car). Remember to include a variety of locations, directions, and forms of transportation on your “trips.” Keep sentences simple and narrate in the target language.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 25
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Performance List for Writing FictionPrimary Level
1. I have an interesting setting and characters for my story.
Terrific O.K. Needs
Work
What will you try to do better the next time you write a story?
2. The problem in my story willbe clear to my readers.
3. My story events are in order.
4. The solution will be clear to my readers.
5. I used many describing words to tell what is happening. 6. My words “paint a picture.”
7. I have a title that goes with my story.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 26
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Teaching and Learning for Understanding
Transferlearning to new
situations
Make Meaning of “big ideas”(key principles and processes)
Acquire important knowledge and skills
What does it mean to teach and learn for understanding? We have found it useful to consider this question by examining three distinct, yet interrelated, learning goals: 1) acquisition of new information and skill, 2) making meaning of that content (i.e., coming to understand), and 3) transfer of one’s knowledge (i.e., apply‑ing one’s learning to new situations). These three categories link directly to elements identified in Understanding by Design. In Stage 1 teachers specify the knowledge and skill that they intend students to acquire. They also decide upon the “big ideas” they want students to come to understand and develop essential questions to help students make meaning of those ideas. In Stage 2, teachers develop performance tasks requiring transfer as evidence that students understand and can apply their knowledge in authentic contexts.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 27
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
What is Fair?Who won this year’s 7th grade race around the campus?Every year at Birdsong Middle School, there is an all-class race. Below are the results for the 7th grade (which is made up of four different classes). But there is a problem: no one agrees on who won! One person thinks Class C should win the trophy because they had the 1st runner overall in the race. Another person thinks Class D should win because they had 3 runners come in under 10th place. A third person says: just find the average. But a 4th person said: wait a minute – Class C had more students in their class than Class D. Averages won’t be fair! A 5th person says: use the scoring system in Cross Country – just add up the place of finish of the top 5 finishers in each class and the lowest total wins. A 6th person says – unfair! Some classes did well in the first few runners but poorly in the middle! Why should they win? Now, everyone is confused and arguing.
What is the fairest way to determine the winner? Which class should win the trophy? Your group, well-known in the school as a group of expert mathematicians (and respected for your sense of fairness) is being consulted as to who should win the trophy. What will you recommend and why?
Class rank Class A Class B Class C Class D 1 4 6 1 2 2 9 7 3 5 3 11 10 14 8 4 12 13 18 15 5 20 16 19 17 6 21 22 23 31 7 25 24 28 33 8 26 27 30 36 9 29 34 32 37 10 35 39 41 38 11 43 40 44 46 12 45 42 47 51 13 49 48 50 55 14 54 52 56 57 15 61 53 60 58 16 65 62 63 59 17 69 66 64 67 18 70 72 68 19 71 73 20 74
Notes on the chart:• The numbers in the chart, from 1 to 74 represent the place of finish of that runner. So, the overall race winner was from Class C, the number two runner overall was in Class D, etc.• Class rank refers to the rank of finish place in that class, not the overall race. So, the first runner in class A was 4th overall in the race, the 2nd best runner in class A came in 9th overall, etc.• The blanks reflect the fact that each of the 4 classes has a different number of students.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 28
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
A = acquiring basic knowledge and skills M = making meaning T = transfer
Mathematics Unit on Measures of Central Tendency
Essential Question: What is fair - and how can mathematics help us answer the question?
1. Introduce and discuss the essential question, first part - What is “fair”? What is “unfair’? M
2. Introduce the 7th grade race problem. Which of the 7th-grade classes won the race? What is a fair way to decide? Small-group inquiry, followed by class discussion of answers. M
3. Teacher informs students about the mathematical connections derived from the problem analysis, and lays out the unit and its culminating transfer task. A
4. In small-group jigsaw, students share their answers to the INQUIRY sheet, then return to their team to generalize from all the small-group work. Discuss other examples related to the concept of “fairness” such as the following. M - What is a fair way to rank many teams when they do not all play each other? - What is a fair way to split up limited food among hungry people of very different sizes? - When is it ‘fair’ to use majority vote and when is it not fair? What might be fairer? - Is it fair to have apportioned Representatives based on a state’s population, yet have two Senators from each state irrespective of their size? What might be fairer? - What are fair and unfair ways of representing how much money the “average” worker earns, for purposes of making government policy?
5. Teacher connects the discussion to the next section in the textbook - measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation). A
6. Students practice calculating each type of measure. A
7. Teacher gives quiz on mean, median, mode from textbook. A
8. Teacher leads a review and discussion of the quiz results. A M
9. Group task worked on in class: What is the fairest possible grading system for schools to use? M T10. Individuals and small teams present their grading policy recommendations and reasons. M T 11. Culminating transfer task: Each student determines which measure (mean, median or mode) should be used to calculate their grade for the marking period and writes a note to the teacher show‑ing their calculations and explaining their choice. T
12. Students write a reflection on the essential question and their learnings as a result of the unit. M
Coding a Learning Plan Using A - M - T
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 29
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
AC
QU
IRE
MA
KE
MEA
NIN
GTR
AN
SFER
This
goa
l see
ks to
hel
p le
arne
rs a
cqui
re fa
ctua
l in
form
atio
n an
d ba
sic
skill
s.
This
goa
l see
ks to
hel
p st
uden
ts
cons
truc
t mea
ning
(i.e
., co
me
to a
n un
ders
tand
ing)
of i
mpo
rtant
idea
s an
d pr
oces
ses.
This
goa
l see
ks to
supp
ort
the
lear
ner’s
abi
lity
to
tran
sfer
thei
r lea
rnin
g au
tono
mou
sly
and
effe
ct-
ivel
y in
new
situ
atio
ns.
Thre
e In
terr
elat
edLe
arni
ng G
oals
→
Teac
her R
ole/
Inst
ruct
iona
l St
rate
gies
Not
e: L
ike
the
abov
e le
arni
ng g
oals
, the
se
thre
e te
achi
ng ro
les
(and
thei
r ass
ocia
ted
met
hods
) wor
k to
geth
-er
in p
ursu
it of
iden
ti-fie
d le
arni
ng re
sults
.
Dire
ct In
stru
ctio
nIn
this
role
, the
teac
her’s
pri‑
mar
y ro
le is
to in
form
the
lear
n‑er
s thr
ough
exp
licit
inst
ruct
ion
in ta
rget
ed k
now
ledg
e an
d sk
ills;
di
ffere
ntia
ting
as n
eede
d.
St
rate
gies
incl
ude:
m
dia
gnos
tic a
sses
smen
t
m
lect
ure
m
adv
ance
d or
gani
zers
m
gra
phic
org
aniz
ers
m
que
stio
ning
(con
verg
ent)
m
dem
onst
ratio
n/m
odel
ing
m
pro
cess
gui
des
m
gui
ded
prac
tice
m
feed
back
, cor
rect
ions
,
m
diff
eren
tiatio
n
Faci
litat
ive
Teac
hing
Teac
hers
in th
is ro
le e
ngag
e th
e le
arne
rs in
ac
tivel
y pr
oces
sing
info
rmat
ion
and
guid
e th
eir i
nqui
ry in
to c
ompl
ex p
robl
ems,
text
s, pr
ojec
ts, c
ases
, or s
imul
atio
ns; d
iffer
entia
ting
as n
eede
d.
Stra
tegi
es in
clud
e:
m
dia
gnos
tic a
sses
smen
t
m u
sing
ana
logi
es
m
gra
phic
org
aniz
ers
m
que
stio
ning
(div
erge
nt) &
pro
bing
m
con
cept
atta
inm
ent
m
inqu
iry-o
rient
ed a
ppro
ache
s
m P
robl
em-B
ased
Lea
rnin
g
m S
ocra
tic S
emin
ar
m R
ecip
roca
l Tea
chin
g
m fo
rmat
ive
(on-
goin
g) a
sses
smen
ts
m
und
erst
andi
ng n
oteb
ook
m
feed
back
/ cor
rect
ions
m re
thin
king
and
refle
ctio
n pr
ompt
s
m d
iffer
entia
ted
inst
ruct
ion
Coa
chin
gIn
a c
oach
ing
role
, tea
cher
s es
tabl
ish
clea
r per
form
ance
go
als,
supe
rvis
e on
-goi
ng
oppo
rtuni
ties t
o pe
rfor
m
(inde
pend
ent p
ract
ice)
in
incr
easi
ngly
com
plex
situ
atio
ns,
prov
ide
mod
els a
nd g
ive
on-
goin
g fe
edba
ck (a
s per
sona
lized
as
pos
sibl
e). T
hey
also
pro
vide
“j
ust i
n tim
e te
achi
ng”
(dire
ct
inst
ruct
ion)
whe
n ne
eded
.
Stra
tegi
es in
clud
e:
m
on-
goin
g as
sess
men
t, m
pro
vidi
ng sp
ecifi
c
f
eedb
ack
in th
e co
ntex
t
o
f aut
hent
ic a
pplic
atio
n m
con
fere
ncin
g m
pro
mpt
ing
self
asse
ss-
m
ent a
nd re
flect
ion
Lear
ning
Goa
ls an
d Te
achi
ng R
oles
Not
e: T
hese
thre
e go
als a
re o
f co
urse
inte
rrel
ated
. How
ever
, th
ere
is m
erit
in d
istin
guis
h-in
g th
em to
shar
pen
and
focu
s te
achi
ng a
nd a
sses
smen
t.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 30
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Ideas for Pre-AssessmentThe following pre-assessment techniques provide efficient diagnostic checks of student prior knowledge and misconceptions. This information guides any differentiated instruction/as‑sessment that may be needed.
K-W-L-S Prior to the introduction of a new topic or skill, ask students what they already Know (or think they know) about the topic or skill. These are recorded on a board or chart paper under the “K” column. (Sometimes, students make statements that are incorrect or reveal misconceptions.) Secondly, ask them what they Want to know (or what questions they have) about the topic/skill. These are recorded under the “W” column. (Their questions often reveal interests or “hooks” to the topic. In some cases, their questions reveal misconceptions that will need to be addressed.) As the lesson or unit proceeds, Learnings are summarized and recorded in the “L” column as they occur. (This provides an opportunity to go back and correct any misconcep‑tions that may have been initially recorded in the “K” column.)
Pre-Test (non-graded) Give students a pre-test to check their prior knowledge of key facts and concepts. Use the results to plan instruction and selection of resources. (Make sure that students know that the results will not count toward final grades.)
Skills Check (non-graded) Have students demonstrate their proficiency with a targeted skill or process. It is help‑ful to have a proficiency checklist or developmental rubric to use in assessing the degree of skill competence. Students can then use the checklist or rubric for on-going self assessment.
Web/Concept Map Ask students to create a web or concept map to show the elements or components of a topic or process. This technique is especially effective in revealing whether students have gaps in their knowledge and the extent to which they understand relationships among the elements.
Misconception Check Present students with common errors or predictable misconceptions regarding a designated topic, concept, skill or process. See if they are able to identify the error or misconception and explain why it is erroneous or flawed. The misconception check can also be presented in the form of a true-false quiz, where students must agree or disagree with statements or examples.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 31
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Formative Assessment – Whole Group
The following on-going assessment techniques can be used to obtain a quick “pulse check” of a whole class or group of students.
Hand SignalsAsk students to display a designated hand signal to indicate their understanding of a designated concept, principle, or process. For example, 1. I understand _____________ and can explain it (e.g., thumbs up) 2. I do not yet understand __________________ . (e.g., thumbs down) 3. I’m not completely sure about _____________ . (e.g., wave hand)
White BoardsHave students record a response on a white board and hold it up. For example, Prediction – What number should appear next in the sequence? Agree/Disagree – Is this an example of in the sequence?
Student Response SystemsUse SRS “clickers” to have students record a response to a question or a prompt. The results can be tabulated on the teacher’s computer to provide immediate feedback.
Misconception CheckPresent students with common or predictable misconceptions about a designated con‑cept, principle, or process. Ask them to agree or disagree. Student can respond using hand signals, white boards, SRSs, or on paper.
Anonymous Exit Card (“Ticket to Leave”)Periodically, distribute index cards and ask students to complete the cards at the conclusion of a class period, end of the week, etc. Examples of responses: • What are the most important things you learned about ____? • What do you understand about ______? • What don’t you understand yet? What questions do you have? Scan the cards, looking for patterns (e.g., areas where many students have questions).
ObservationsCarefully observe students as they work or respond to questions. Observe the work they produce. What areas of strength and weakness do you notice.
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 32
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
1. Mandate that every teacher must use UbD for all of their planning immedi‑ately (without sufficient training, on-going support, or structured planning time).
2. Assume that staff members under‑stand the need for UbD and/or will naturally welcome it. In other words, prescribe UbD as an “answer” or “so‑lution” when staff do not see or own the “problem.”
3. Introduce UbD as this year’s focus, suggesting that UbD can be fully im‑plemented in a year and that it bears no relation to last year’s initiative. (This practice can foster a “This too shall pass” attitude in staff.)
4. Attempt to implement too many initiatives simultaneously (e.g., UbD, Differentiated Instruction, Curriculum Mapping, Brain-based Learning, Pro‑fessional Learning Communities, etc.).
5. Provide one introductory presenta‑tion/workshop on UbD and assume that teachers now have the ability to implement it well.
* Think big, but start small; e.g., • Work with volunteers at first
• Ask teachers to plan just one UbD unit per semester for starters. • Encourage teachers to work w/ a colleague or team, and begin w/ a familiar unit topic. • Provide some designated planning time.
* Establish the need for a change (e.g., analysis of performance data or staff/student surveys) before proposing a pre‑scription. Make sure that staff see UbD as an appropriate response to a need that they recognize and own.
* Develop and publish a multi-year plan to show how UbD will be slowly and systematically implemented as part of a larger strategic plan, not simply this years’ “new thing.”
* Develop a 1-page graphic (e.g. limbs of a tree, pieces of a puzzle, supports of a building, etc.) showing how the vari‑ous school/district initiatives are inter‑connected. Use “backward design” to plan all major initiatives.
* Design a long-term professional development program “backward” from your goals. Then, develop a plan for the year (workshops, study groups, action research, etc.) to develop staff competence and confidence with UbD.
How to Kill UbD - by Design
How to Kill UbD - by Design Tips to Avoid Killing UbD
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 33
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
How to Kill UbD - by Design(continued)
6. Provide UbD training for teachers, but not for administrators, OR give adminis‑trators and supervisors the same training as teachers.
7. Provide minimal UbD training for a few teachers in a Train-the-Trainers program and then expect immediate and effective turn-key training of all other staff.
8. Train people in Stage 1 for the first year, Stage 2 in year 2, then Stage 3 in Year 3.
9. Announce that UbD is the official way to plan, and from now on, teachers are expected to use the UbD template to plan each and every lesson.
10. Standardize all UbD implementa‑tion. Do not permit options/alternatives/different approaches to learning and us‑ing UbD. Disregard the interests, talents, and readiness of individuals and teams.
* Establish parallel tracks of training for administrators in which they learn how to supervise and support UbD; e.g., how to conduct in-class “look-fors,” establish peer reviews of units, form PLC teams for peer review, etc.
* Invest in cultivating expertise in a team. Engage staff in “coming to un‑derstand” UbD through study groups, exploration of essential questions and data, etc. Consider using outside experts/consultants to launch UbD when necessary.
* Introduce UbD as a “whole.” Begin by working on elements in all three stages (e.g., EQs for Stage 1,Performance Tasks for Stage 2).
* Make clear that the UbD framework is designed for unit and course design, not for planning individual lessons. Encourage teacher teams to agree on Desired Results (Stage 1) and Evi‑dence (Stage 2), then allow teachers some freedom in how they develop and write lessons (Stage 3).
* Differentiate UbD implementation as appropriate; e.g.: • Allow different departments and grade- level teams some options for actions. • Permit minor modifications to the Tem- plate to highlight specific school/district --goals.
How to Kill UbD - by Design Tips to Avoid Killing UbD
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 34
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Acq
uisit
ion
of K
now
ledg
e &
Ski
ll
Esta
blish
ed G
oals
Mea
ning
Tran
sfer
Stud
ents
will
kno
w...
Stag
e 1
– D
esir
ed R
esul
ts
UN
DER
STA
ND
ING
SSt
uden
ts w
ill u
nder
stan
d th
at...
Stud
ents
will
be
able
to in
depe
nden
tly u
se th
eir l
earn
ing
to...
ESSE
NTI
AL
QU
ESTI
ON
SSt
uden
ts w
ill k
eep
cons
ider
ing.
..
UbD
Tem
plat
e 2.
0
Stud
ents
will
be
skill
ed a
t...
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 35
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Eva
luat
ive
Cri
teri
aA
sses
smen
t Evi
denc
e
OTH
ER E
VID
ENC
E
PER
FOR
MA
NC
E TA
SK(S
)Stag
e 2
– Ev
iden
ceU
bD T
empl
ate
2.0
Cod
ing
© 2012 Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins 36
Curriculum Planning for Understanding
Stag
e 3
– Le
arni
ng P
lan
UbD
Tem
plat
e 2.
0
Cod
ing
LEA
RN
ING
EV
ENTS
Prog
ress
M
onito
ring
Pre-
asse
ssm
ent
To strengthen the professional skills of ASCD members and others in the fields of
curriculum, instruction, supervision, and leader behavior.
Participants must have attended three, two or three day
ASCD Professional Development Institutes over a period of two years. Only Institutes paid for at
regular price will count toward earned professional development.
Registration fee is waived for the fourth institute attended within the same
two-year period. Participants are responsible for materials fees, if applicable.
When you are ready to register for your complimentary Institute, complete this
registration form and mail it to the ASCD Service Center.
NAME: _________________________________________________________________
JOB TITLE: _____________________________________________________________
ADDRESS: ______________________________________________________________
PHONE: ________________________________________________________________
E-MAIL: _________________________________________________________________
1. PDI CODE/TITLE: _____________________________________________________ Date: _________________
2. PDI CODE/TITLE: _____________________________________________________ Date: _________________
3. PDI CODE/TITLE: _____________________________________________________ Date: _________________
PDI CODE#: ___________________________ TITLE: __________________________________________________
Let ASCD Help Guide Your Professional Development Planning
Whether your professional development plan goals are for your school, district, region,or state, you’ll need a winning plan and the right tools and resources. That is whereASCD can help. Let ASCD support your professional development plans.
We’ll Come to Your Site
ASCD Staff and Faculty Members will work with you to match your identified need withappropriate capacity-building professional development that will build instructional andleadership expertise in your location.
Choose from the Best New Ideas for Today’s Schools:• CommonCoreStandards• ArtandScienceofTeaching• ClassroomAssessmentandGrading• TeacherEffectiveness• FormativeAssessment• TeacherLeadership• UnderstandingbyDesign®
• DifferentiatedInstruction• LeadershipandPrincipalEffectiveness• SchoolImprovement• WorkingwithEnglishLanguageLearnersintheMainstream
Plusmanymore...
Formoreinformation,contactJeanPride,[email protected].
I am interested in having an ASCD Faculty Member come to my school or district for capacity-building professional development.
Name ______________________________________________________________
School/District ______________________________________________ State __________
Contact Number ______________________________________________________________
EmailAddress ______________________________________________________________
Areas of Interest ______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
PleasegivecompletedformtotheASCDstaffmemberon-site.
Capacity-Building Professional Development
Contact Directory
ASCD Constituent Services [email protected] 1
Affective Factors in Learning Harriett Arnold Phone: 1-209-946-2807 Fax: 1-408-258-8096 [email protected] Laura Frey Phone: 1-989-774-3287 Fax: 1-408-258-8096 [email protected] African American Critical Issues Loucrecia Collins Phone: 1-205-975-1984 Fax: 1-205-975-8040 [email protected] Donald Davis Phone: 1-706-860-9686 Fax: 1-706-737-0294 [email protected] Tyrone Harris Phone: 1-501-447-5102 Fax: 1-501-447-5101 [email protected] Arts in Education Fran Meyer Phone: 1-434-395-2454 Fax: 1-434-395-2729 [email protected] John L. Ceschini Phone: 1-410-783-2367 Fax: 1-410-783-0275 [email protected]
Assessment for Learning Michael Rulon Phone: 1-401-359-6152 [email protected] Robert Hogg Phone: 1- 780-447-9420 Fax: 1-780-447-2531 [email protected] Brain-Compatible Learning Pauline Stonehouse Phone: 1-320-763-7635 [email protected] Early Childhood Education Tim Kinard Phone: 1-512-245-2157 Fax: 1-512-245-7911 [email protected] Kathleen Fite Phone: 1-512-245-3103 Fax: 1-512-245-7911 [email protected] Environmental Education Kathy McGlauflin Phone: 1-202-463-8352 Fax: 1-202-463-2461 [email protected]
Contact Directory
ASCD Constituent Services [email protected] 2
Gifted and Advanced Learners Jaime Castellano Phone: 1-928-755-1300 Fax: 1-928-755-1302 [email protected] Peter Laing Phone: 1-602-364-3842 [email protected] Global Education Anne Baker Phone: 1-202-293-7728 x12 Fax: 1-202-293-7554 [email protected] Douglas Schermer Phone: 1-319-750-4154 [email protected] Higher Education and K-12 in Service of Teaching& Learning Diane Heacox Phone: 1-651-690-6614 Fax: 1-651-690-8651 [email protected]
Hispanic/Latino American Critical Issues Hilda Baca-Fetcenko Phone: 1-310-243-1025 Fax: 1-310-217-6936 [email protected] Jaime Castellano Phone: 1-928-755-1300 Fax: 1-928-755-1302 [email protected] Margarita Pinkos [email protected] Holistic Learning & Spirituality in Education Gary Babiuk Phone: 1-204-474-7809 Fax: 1-204-474-5500 [email protected] Holocaust Education Brian Kahn Phone: 1-217-369-5039 [email protected] Cindy Wilson Phone: 1-217-206-6386 Fax: 1-217-206-6715 [email protected] Interdisciplinary Curriculum and Instruction Lois Stanciak Phone: 1- 630-942-2800 Fax: 1-630-942-2974 [email protected]
Contact Directory
ASCD Constituent Services [email protected] 3
International Alliance for Invitational Education Melissa A. Cain Phone: 1-419-424-4840 Fax: 1- 419-424-5342 [email protected] Joan R. Fretz Phone: 1-631-673-2106 EXT 2053 Fax: 1-631-425-4644 [email protected] Literacy, Language and Literature Esther Fusco Phone: 1- 516-463-7704 Fax: 1-631-751-8972 [email protected] Lenore Sandel Phone: 1-516 -764-0440 Language Varieties (Pidgins, Creoles, and Other Stigmatized Varieties) Ermile Hargrove Phone: 1-808-247-9511 [email protected] Mentoring Leadership and Resource Richard Lange Phone: 1-847-537-6029 Fax: 1-847-465-5629 [email protected] Amelia Hicks Phone: 1-630-569-1996 Fax: 1-847-426-4976 [email protected]
Middle Grades Alfred Arth Phone: 1-402-363-5697 Fax: 1-402-363-5733 [email protected] Patricia Johnson Phone: 1-575-382-4331 [email protected] Thomas Kane Phone: 1-732-223-1937 [email protected] Kathleen Wheeler Phone: 1-402-363-5696 Fax: 1-402-363-5733 [email protected] Multiple Intelligences Thomas Hoerr Phone: 1-314-361-6411 Fax: 1-314-361-1499 [email protected] Overseas and International Schools Diane Simmons-Tomczak [email protected]
Contact Directory
ASCD Constituent Services [email protected] 4
Performance Assessment for Leadership Luana Zellner Phone: 1-936-294-1155 [email protected] Genevieve Brown Phone: 1-936-294-1101 Fax: 1-936-294-1102 [email protected] Problem-Based Learning Debra Gerdes Phone: 1-630-907-5957 Fax: 1-630-907-5946 [email protected] Professional Learning Community Lori Stollar Phone: 1-717-624-6600 Fax: 1-717-624-6522 [email protected] Religion and Public Education James Uphoff Phone: 1-937-775-3651 Fax: 1-937-299-0878 [email protected]
Restructuring Schools Mamzelle Adolphine Phone: 1-718-462-7877 [email protected] Service-Learning Network Larry C. Fletch Phone: 1-360-606-4749 Fax: 1-360-694-2491 [email protected] Elizabeth Manning [email protected] Teacher Evaluation David Silverberg Phone: 1-310-968-1082 [email protected] Women’s Leadership Issues Nora Mazzone Phone: 1-914-220-3015 [email protected]