7
Stability of Sheet Pile Walls HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering Typically, sheet pile walls are cantilevered, anchored or braced. Cantileve red Anchored Braced Common forms of failure are: (i) rotation of wall, (ii) forward movement of wall, (iii) failure of piles (sheet piles) due to bending, and (iv) failure of anchors or bracing.

Unit1 Wall Stability

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

lecture

Citation preview

Page 1: Unit1 Wall Stability

Stability of Sheet Pile Walls

HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering

Typically, sheet pile walls are cantilevered, anchored or braced.

Cantilevered Anchored Braced

Common forms of failure are: (i) rotation of wall, (ii) forward movement of wall, (iii) failure of piles (sheet piles) due to bending, and (iv) failure of anchors or bracing.

Page 2: Unit1 Wall Stability

Failure of Cantilevered Sheet Pile Wall by Rotation

HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering

To calculate the minimum embedment depth of a cantilevered sheet pile wall, we first need to determine where the “point of rotation” is located.

Therefore, we need a simple model:

Active

Passive

Passive

Note: Wall depends on passive pressure for stabilityAssumed point of rotation

Actual Case (net)

Wall is assumed to rotate about some point producing active and passive pressures as shown on the right.

Page 3: Unit1 Wall Stability

Failure of Cantilevered Sheet Pile Wall by Rotation – Simple Model

HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering

This can be further simplified to:

Hint: You can sum moments about different points to obtain equations, then solve to find the location of rotation.

Point of rotation

H

d

Active

Passive

Passive

Does this active pressure zone exist ?

Page 4: Unit1 Wall Stability

Failure of Cantilevered Sheet Pile Wall by Rotation – Simple Model

HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering

Therefore,

H

d

Pactive

Ppassive

2/3 (H+d)

2d/3 P2 , which represents the sum of passive pressure below the point of rotation. This is not correct. However, by rule of thumb, we can assume this to simplify our calculations as long as we increase the final embedment depth by about 20%.

FS

Point of rotation

dHP aa 2

1 dHdHK soila 2

1 2

2

1dHK soila

And, dP pp 2

1ddK soilp

2

1 2

2

1dK soilp

Page 5: Unit1 Wall Stability

Approximate Method for Calculating Embedment Depth of Sheet Pile Walls

HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering

Then summing the moments about the point of rotation to solve for d (Since H should be known),

H

d

Pactive

Ppassive

2/3 (H+d)

2d/3 P2 , which represents the sum of passive pressure below the point of rotation. This is not correct. However, by rule of thumb, we can assume this to simplify our calculations as long as we increase the final embedment depth by about 20%.

FS

Point of rotation

0033 2

Pd

FS

PdHP pa

M rotation point = 0 +

This simplifies to: 3

3

d

dHFS

K

K

a

p Now solve for d – then add 20%

Page 6: Unit1 Wall Stability

Failure of Anchored Sheet Piling

HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering

To reduce sheet pile wall driving depth, or if the wall is too high, sheet piles maybe anchored near the top. Thus, the force produced by the anchor supplements the lost passive force

Assuming no passive failure to the toe occurs, we can simplify the lateral soil pressures.

or

Anchor Point

ActiveActive

PassivePassive failure at toe ?

Deflected Shapes

Page 7: Unit1 Wall Stability

Anchored Sheet Piling – Simplified Lateral Earth Pressures

HES3150 Geotechnical Engineering

H

d

a

Point of rotation

Total passive force, Pp

Total active force, Pa

FS

Anchor Force

Knowing, 2

2

1dHKP soilaa and 2

2

1dKP soilpp

M anchor = 0 + 03

2

3

2

daH

FS

PadHP p

a

Then F horizontal = 0 a

p PFS

P ForceAnchor Should provide the required anchor force.

And solving for d.